the business case for enterprise risk management...the business case for enterprise risk management...

41
BANK MANAGEMENT The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte Professor of Enterprise Risk Management North Carolina State University Melodye Mayes Tomlin Senior Vice President & Enterprise Risk Management Coordinator Branch Banking &Trust Company

Upload: others

Post on 15-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management

American Bankers AssociationOctober 7, 2007San Diego, CA

Mark S. BeasleyDeloitte Professor of Enterprise Risk

ManagementNorth Carolina State University

Melodye Mayes TomlinSenior Vice President & Enterprise

Risk Management CoordinatorBranch Banking &Trust Company

Page 2: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Today’s Objectives

1. Determining the Strategic Focus for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

2. Identifying First Steps of ERM Launch

3. Achieving the ERM Value Proposition

Page 4: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Risk Characteristics…Make Risk Management Difficult

Risks are…KnownUnknown, but knowableUnknown, Unknown

Despite that… Expectations for Management: 1. Shift more to the “known” status2. Have a plan for unknown, unknown

Page 5: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Emerging Risks in Financial Services

• ALLL – accounting vs. regulatory expectation

• Stock options and insider trading

• Credit card practices

• Change in legislative environment

• Pandemic planning

• Payment strategies

• Sub-prime lending and Alt A

• Tax strategies

Page 6: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Expectations for Oversight of Risk Management on the Rise

• NYSE Listing Standards:The audit committee has the duty and responsibility to “discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.”

• Rating agencies now focusing on ERM practicesStandard & PoorsMoody'sFitch

• SEC requirements to consider risk factor disclosures• Federal Sentencing Guidelines• Regulatory Expectations• Interpretations of Delaware case law

Additionally for Banks….Basel II

Page 7: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

ERM Evolution at BB&T• Enterprise risk management is not a new function (but it is a new

department).

• The proposed changes in Basel prompted us to evaluate our risk management structure.

• BB&T’s growth was largely through acquisitions ($ 10 billion in 1995 to $127 billion today).

• Expectations from the banking regulators changed as the organization became more complex.

• The development and communication of a corporate risk management policy clearly defines our approach.

• Annual reporting to the Boards of Directors began in August 2004 and ongoing reporting to the Risk Management and Executive Committee began in December 2005.

Page 8: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Many Organizations Still Use a Traditional Risk Management Approach…

Strategic Market Risks

Operations Risks

Finance Risks

IT Risks Legal Risks

Reputation Risks

Human Capital Risks

“Silo” or “Stove-Pipe” Risk Management…

Page 9: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT Reactive

-Lack of Board or senior management emphasis on risk

-No common risk lingo

-Stove-pipe risk management

-Ad hoc approach

-Missing coverage of risk areas

Aware

-Some board and senior management support

-Risk leader identified

-Periodic risk profiling

-Key risks defined in common vocabulary

-Recognized need for ERM

Strategic

-Proactive board and senior management involvement

-Risk managed and assessed across entire organization

-Common language and approach used and understood

-Real-time analysis of risk portfolio

…But are Seeking to Move Up the Risk Management Continuum

*Most companies straddle these two stages*

Page 10: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Risk Management Direction – Other Banks*

*Source: Global Risk Management Survey; 5th Edition – Deloitte & Touche LLP - 2007

Key Findings from Respondents:

• 70% - Oversight responsibility w/BOD (57% in 2002)

• 84% - A Chief Risk Officer is in place (65% in 2002)

• 80% - Believe RM is extremely or very effective for credit/market risk (47% for business continuity/IT security, 43% operational/vendor risk and 35% for geopolitical risk)

• 35% - ERM program is in place (32% in process / 18% planning)

• 75% - ERM program’s value exceeded cost (only 4% quantify)

“Most institutions have an unfinished agenda when it comes to developing sophisticated risk management capabilities.”

Page 11: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Today’s Objectives

1. Determining the Strategic Focus for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

2. Identifying First Steps of ERM Launch

3. Achieving the ERM Value Proposition

Page 12: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Many are Embracing an “Enterprise Risk Management” Approach to Oversight

ERM is a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel,

applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise,designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, manage risks to be within its risk appetite,

to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives.

-Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2004) *

* See www.coso.org for more information

Page 13: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

ERM Brings Risks TogetherValuation Creation and Preservation

Enterprise Focus on Risks

Key Message: Senior Management is facilitating the aggregation and interactions of those risk exposures

Strategic Market Risks

Operations Risks

Finance Risks

IT Risks Legal Risks

Reputation Risks

Human Capital Risks

Page 14: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

The Role of ERM (today) Within BB&T is…

• Monitoring emerging risks,

• Reviewing cross-functional risk policies,

• Working with management to identify previously undetected cross-functional risks, and

• Developing enterprise-wide risk management processes.

Also included are independent oversight functions regarding operational, market, and credit risks, with no transfer of the ownership of risk. In total, the ERM Department skill sets have been selectively combined in order to provide subject matter experts that can enhance Executive Management’s oversight of traditional risk management practices.

Page 15: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Today’s Objectives

1. Determining the Strategic Focus for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

2. Identifying First Steps of ERM Launch

3. Achieving the ERM Value Proposition

Page 16: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Defining Key Initial Steps

Step 1:Assess ERM

Culture

Page 17: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Recognizing Realities of Culture and ERM

• Embrace of ERM can threaten “organizational culture” Fear of exposing vulnerabilities –desire to hide risksERM – another fad?Correlations and aggregations of risks – easy in concept, hard in realityPressure to go from “0 to 60” overnightInadequate risk information systems for tracking and reporting risksResistance is rationalChange is disruptive – it will get worse before it gets better

• Top-down approach is critical

ERM Deployment requires “evolution” – not a flip of the switch

Page 18: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Integrating ERM with the Culture

• ERM had the support of Executive Management

• Understanding the BB&T culture was a priority

• Education of ERM possibilities was important

• ERM developed into a collaborative initiative

• Early on ERM focused on the ‘value’; the structure followed

• ERM filled identified ‘gaps’

• ERM has evolved at its own pace

Page 19: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Defining Key Initial Steps

Step 1:Assess ERM

Culture

Step 2: Identify Core People

Page 20: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Creating an ERM Culture of Accountability• CEO viewed as ultimately responsible for ERM

Practically difficult for CEO to lead detailed risk management effort

• Most CEO’s are delegating to a “Risk Champion” to facilitate risk approaches

• Some pinpoint a C-level executive to leadRise of Chief Risk OfficersOthers assign dual titles to Other Officers

– General Counsel, VP Internal Audit, VP of Strategy

• Others create an Executive CommitteeExecutive Management Committees Separate Risk Committees

Page 21: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

BB&T ERM Committee Structure

Loan PolicyCommittee

BB&T Board of Directors

Executive Management

ORMCommittee

ComplianceOversightCommittee

Market Risk &Liquidity

Committee

ERMCommittee

StrategicRisk

All Employees

Credit Risk OperationalRisk

ComplianceRisk

LiquidityRisk

ReputationRisk

LegalRisk

MarketRisk

Page 22: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

BB&T ERM Department Organization

Enterprise Risk Manager

Corporate Business Recovery

ERM-Credit Risk Review

Corporate Bank

Investigations

Operational Risk

Management

ERM-Market Risk

Amendment

ERM Operations

Page 23: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Defining Key Initial Steps

Step 1:Assess ERM

Culture

Step 2: Identify Core People

Step 3: Identify Key Risk Categories

Page 24: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

ERM Brings Risks Together

Key Message: Helpful to have some “buckets” for categorizing risks

Valuation Creation and Preservation

Enterprise Focus on Risks

Strategic Market Risks

Operations Risks

Finance Risks

IT Risks Legal Risks

Reputation Risks

Human Capital Risks

Page 25: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

ERM

Standard & Poor’s Example of Risk Categories

Page 26: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Category Definition ExamplesCredit Risks that arise from a borrower’s or counterparties’ inability or

unwillingness to repay their financial obligations as agreed. Components of credit risk can include collateral, market conditions, concentration, cash flow, credit ratings, portfolio and product issues. Credit risk extends beyond traditional lending and includes both on and off balance sheet commitments.

•Loan Default (failure to meet the terms of the obligation)•Loan Losses and non-performing assets•Electronic Payments (ACH, Wire Transfers, and On-line Banking,) •Overdrafts and return items •Investment securities•Controlled disbursement accounts•Sub-prime lending•Off balance sheet (i.e. derivatives and letters of credit)•Official checks (issued for clients)

Legal/Compliance

Risks that arise from violations or nonconformance with laws, rules and regulations (federal, state or local), or prescribed practices which govern BB&T’s business activities. It encompasses all laws as well as prudent governance and ethical standards and contractual obligations and includes the exposure to litigation from all types of financial services activities, both bank and non-bank. Legal/compliance risk also arises in situations where the laws, regulations or rules governing certain products or services we offer or activities of our clients may be ambiguous or untested. These risks could expose BB&T to fines, damages, civil penalties or prosecution.

•Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and state banking regulations•Securities & Exchange Commission, New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers regulations and rules•Major US banking laws (including but not limited to the Bank Secrecy Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Privacy Act, Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, Gramm-Leach Bliley Act, USA PATRIOT Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and Check 21)•Contract negotiations and disputes•Litigation and administrative proceedings•Fiduciary responsibilities •Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

Liquidity Risks that arise in meeting our commitments when they come due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding or the inability to offset specific exposures due to inadequate market depth or market disruptions without incurring unacceptable consequences. Factors which should be considered include regulatory requirements, accounting treatment, market conditions and potential losses.

•Incorrect matching of assets and liabilities •Daylight overdrafts•Significant or unplanned loan growth •Over reliance on brokered deposits or run on deposits•Concentration ratios (i.e. public funds, clients, etc.)•Inability to make settlement payment•Funding limitations (investment portfolio, commercial paper)

Page 27: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Category Definition ExamplesMarket Risks that arise from changes in the value of the portfolios of financial

instruments due to adverse movement in market rates or prices. Factors which should be considered include interest/exchange rate sensitive activities, accounting treatment, market conditions and potential losses.

•Portfolio (i.e. investment concentrations, durations, correlations) •Trading account or inventory risk•Hedge effectiveness (improper or lack of hedging) •Interest rate sensitive activities (i.e. BOLI, MSRs, value based fees)•Modeling errors (i.e. assumptions, values)•Foreign exchange rates (foreign letters of credit, forward contract)

Operational The risk of loss associated with inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems or external events.

•Internal Processes (i.e. financial reporting misstatements, inadequate reconcilements, errors and omissions, missing/incomplete documentation, improper safeguarding of assets, inadequate internal controls, failed processor settlement, improper markups)•People (i.e. embezzlement and asset misappropriation, authorization/approval limits, keying/input error, management override, unethical acts (real or perceived))•Systems (i.e. IT systems failure, inappropriate information security access)•External Events (i.e. external fraud (real or perceived), legal liability, outsourcing, check kiting, counterfeit transactions, natural disasters)

Reputation Risks that arise due to negative publicity or public opinion (either real or perceived) that may adversely impact the BB&T brand image. Reputation risk can impact our clients, employees, communities or shareholders and is often a secondary result of one of the other six risk categories.

•Corporate scandals (i.e. accounting irregularities, governance)•Industry related risk (i.e. insurance, mutual funds) •Inherent nature of business (i.e. payday lending, embassy accounts)•Third party relationships (i.e. clients, service providers)•Employee morale (i.e. layoffs, corporate change) •Employee activities (i.e. e-mails, rogue trading)•Regulations (i.e. fines, violations, untested regulations)•Litigation •Client Service (i.e. system availability, processing errors)

Strategic Risk that our business strategy and objectives (i.e. the Corporate Plan) do not allow BB&T to achieve our Vision, Mission and Purpose. The responsibility for managing this risk rests with the Board of Directors, Executive Management and the Senior Leadership Team. Any inability to execute the corporate plan generally is a result of one of the other six risk categories.

•Integrated Relationship Management•Decathlon•Client Service Model•Financial goals•IT plans (i.e. outsourcing, hardware and software solutions)•Business, product, delivery channel or geographic directions•Succession Plan•Organizational Structure•Community Banking Model

Page 28: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Defining Key Initial Steps

Step 4: Agree on Common Risk

Definitions

Step 1:Assess ERM

Culture

Step 2: Identify Core People

Step 3: Identify Key Risk Categories

Page 29: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Clarification of Terminology is Key• “Risk” is in the eye of the beholder

Risk averse and risk seekers both claim they manage “risk”• Need to determine – is “risk” all bad?

Each entity needs to set some basic definition of key termsEarly steps can be merely a conversation

• COSO DefinitionsRisk – possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect the achievement of

objectivesOpportunities – possibility that an event will occur and positively affect the

achievement of objectivesRisk appetite – the amount of risk, on a broad level, an entity is willing to accept in

the pursuit of valueRisk tolerance – acceptable levels of variation relative to the achievement of

objectives• Over time – may lead to more formalization

Page 30: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Common Risk Language Term

Definition

ACH Risk

The credit and/or operational risks inherent in the Automated Clearing House (ACH) Network. The ACH network is a processing and delivery system that enables the distribution and settlement of electronic batch transactions between financial institutions.

Application Controls Programmed procedures in application software, and related manual procedures, designed to help ensure the completeness and accuracy of information processing.

Automated Controls Internal controls which are built into computer systems and/or programs. Basis Risk The risk associated with changing rate relationships among different yield curves and products affecting bank

activities. Convexity The rate of change of the price/yield of a particular security relative to a general yield curve movement. Correlation Statistical measure of the degree to which the movements of two variables are related. Credit Loss The loss which results from a credit risk or the failure of lending personnel to properly execute a transaction. Credit Operational Loss A loss in the lending portfolio which results from an operational risk. Credit Risk Risks that arise from a borrower’s or counterparties’ inability or unwillingness to repay their financial obligations

as agreed. Components of credit risk can include collateral, market conditions, concentration, cash flow, credit ratings, portfolio and product issues. Credit risk extends beyond traditional lending and includes both on and off balance sheet commitments.

Common Risk Language The foundation for the discussion of risks across the BB&T organization and consists of seven risk categories and their associated definitions, relevant examples and a risk and control dictionary.

Control Activities The policies and procedures, direct or through application of technology, to help ensure that management’s risk responses are carried out.

Control Environment The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values and competence of the entity's people; management's philosophy and operating style; the way management assigns authority and responsibility, and organizes and develops its people; and the attention and direction provided by the board of directors.

Corporate Governance The framework by which the board of directors and senior management establishes and pursues objectives while providing effective separation of ownership and control. It includes processes within the organization that ensure the reliability of the system of controls to monitor compliance with adopted strategies and risk tolerance.

Management Override Management's overruling of prescribed policies or procedures for illegitimate purposes with the intent of personal gain or an enhanced presentation of an entity's financial condition or compliance status (contrast this term with Management Intervention).

Manual Controls Controls performed manually, not by a computer. Market Liquidity Risk The potential that an institution cannot easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering

market prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions. Market Risk Risks that arise from changes in the value of the portfolios of financial instruments due to adverse movement in

market rates or prices. Factors that should be considered include interest/exchange rate sensitive activities, accounting treatment, market conditions and potential losses.

Material Weakness A significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

Minimum Regulatory Capital

The minimum amount of capital imposed by the regulator.

Operational Incident One of three types of operational risk events (issue, incident, loss). The identification of circumstances, if left unattended, may lead to a future incident and/or loss.

Operational Issue One of three types of operational risk events (issue, incident, loss). The occurrence of circumstances that resulted in no loss. It may or may not lead to a future loss.

Operational Loss One of three types of operational risk events (issue, incident, loss). The occurrence of circumstances that resulted in a loss.

Operational Risk The risk of loss associated with inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems or external events. Operational Risk Event An operational event that may or may not lead to a loss. Opportunity The possibility that an event will occur and positively affect the achievement of objectives. Options Risk The risk associated with interest-related options embedded in financial products. Outsourcing The use of an independent contractor to provide services that would otherwise be performed by employees. Potential Loss The estimated loss that could occur based on current information and events. Preventive Control The processes and risk management strategies that deter an error or exception from occurring. Probable Loss The estimated loss that will likely occur based on current information and events. Probability of Default (PD)

The likelihood that a debt instrument will default within a stated timeframe.

Page 31: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Defining Key Initial Steps

Step 4: Agree on Common Risk

Definitions

Step 1:Assess ERM

Culture

Step 2: Identify Core People

Step 3: Identify Key Risk Categories

Step 5: Begin Building Risk

Inventory

Page 32: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Cash Flow•

Collateral•

Commodities•

Concentration•

Counterparty•

Credit•

Default•

Equity•

Financial Instruments•

Foreign Exchange•

Interest Rate•

Liquidity•

Modeling•

Opportunity Cost

Brand/Reputation

Business Model

Business Portfolio

Delivery Channels

Intellectual Property

Marketplace

Organization Structure

Planning

Product Life Cycle

Resource Allocation

Social Responsibility

• Capital Availability • Disease • Industry • Regulatory • Technological Innovation

• Competitor • Economy • Legal • Shareholder Relations • Terrorism

• Customer Needs • Financial Markets • Natural Hazard/Catastrophe • Sovereign/Political

•Capital Availability • Disease • Industry • Regulatory • Technological Innovation• Competitor • Economy • Legal • Shareholder Relations • Terrorism• Customer Needs • Financial Markets • Natural Hazard/Catastrophe • Sovereign/Political

StrategicStrategic OperationalOperational FinancialFinancial

Process

Alignment Business InterruptionCapacity Change ResponseCompliance Contract CommitmentCustomer SatisfactionCycle Time

Accounting Information Budgeting & Forecasting Completeness/Accuracy Investment EvaluationPension Fund Regulatory ReportingTaxation Sarbanes Oxley

Conflict of InterestEmployee FraudEthical Decision Making Illegal ActsManagement FraudThird-Party FraudUnauthorized Acts

Access AvailabilityCapacityData Integritye-CommerceInfrastructureRelevanceReliability

Often Start by Building Business Risk Inventory

•Performance Gap•Physical Security•Product Development•

Product Liability•

Product/Service Failure•

Product/Service Pricing

AccountabilityChange ReadinessCommunications Competencies/SkillsEmpowermentHiring/RetentionLeadershipOutsourcingPerformance IncentivesSuccession PlanningTraining/Development

\Turnbull 030117vb.ppt

Relationship Mgmt Strategy ImplementationSourcingSupply ChainTransactionProcessing

EfficiencyEnvironmentalHealth & SafetyKnowledge ManagementMeasurementPartnering

INTERNAL RISKSINTERNAL RISKS

EXTERNAL RISKSEXTERNAL RISKS

Human Capital Integrity TechnologyManagement Information

INDUSTRY-

SPECIFIC RISKS

Page 33: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Risk & Control Self-Assessment ProcessLibrary

ManagementAssessment

DefinitionRisk

Assignment Assessment Issue Action Plan

Assessment, Issue & Action Plan

Approval

Process Owner

ERM Facilitator

LOB Owner

Process Assessor

Create & Maintain

LOB Information

Create and Distribute

Assessment

Assign Risk

Categories

Review and Approve

Assessment and Issue(s) (if identified)

Approve Action Plan

Complete Risk & Control Assessments

Identify and Define Issues

Accept Risk(Issue closed)

Identify and Define Action

Plans

Edit/Close Action Plans

Participate with Process Assessor in Completion of Risk & Control Assessments

Page 34: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

ERM Objective

Portfolio of Risks

Stakeholder Risk Appetite

Page 35: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Some Express in Relation to a Heat Map

1 3 5 8 10Probability of Occurrence

Impa

ct of

Occu

rrenc

e

Page 36: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Today’s Objectives

1. Determining the Strategic Focus for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

2. Identifying First Steps of ERM Launch

3. Achieving the ERM Value Proposition

Page 37: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Business Case for ERM1. Better information about risks

All entities face risks and risks constantly change – a huge information need

2. Opportunities to take risk Some risks create opportunities for returnsOther risks are over-managed

3. Partnering on risk responsesCapture efficiencies of coordinated risk responses

4. Consistency in approachWork off same “score sheet”Avoid offsetting risk “gains” with inefficient risk management

5. Strategic advantageNot all strategies bear same level of risksEnsure return is commensurate with riskRisk intelligence leads to competitive advantage – beat competition in

response

Page 38: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Have to Help Connect ERM Activities to ValueIncreased Shareholder

Value

Increase in Revenues

Decrease in Overall Costs

Regulators Congress

Management

ERM ActivitiesIncreased productivity

Continuity of operations

Better work environment

Enhanced reputation

Partnering on risk solutions

Better resource allocation

Response to risks in early stage

Compliance with regulations

Decrease cost of capital

Page 39: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

The ‘Value-add’ Proposition• Qualitative vs. quantitative

• Cross-functional risk discussions

• Identification of gaps in ‘risk ownership’

• Common risk language

• Consolidated issues tracking (audit, compliance, regulatory, SOX)

• Consistent review of risk related policies

• Coordinated risk discussion related to new product/initiatives

• Integrated risk assessments

• Regulatory coordination

Page 40: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

Company Perspective:

“I think the point to risk management is not to try and operate your business in a risk-free environment. It’s

to tip the scale to your advantage. So it becomes strategic rather than just defensive.”

– Peter Cox, CFO, United Grain Growers Ltd.

Page 41: The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management...The Business Case for Enterprise Risk Management American Bankers Association October 7, 2007 San Diego, CA Mark S. Beasley Deloitte

BA

NK

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

NC State’s ERM InitiativeWeb Site ResourcesSummaries and links to ERM resources:

- ERM conceptual frameworks- Business press articles- Books- Best practice documents- Conferences and other programs

www.erm.ncsu.edu