the cerebellum and cognition: a 25-year check up rich ivry cognition and action laboratory...
TRANSCRIPT
The Cerebellum and Cognition: A The Cerebellum and Cognition: A 25-Year Check Up25-Year Check Up
Rich IvryCognition and Action LaboratoryUniversity of California, Berkeley
Where's the cerebellum?
The Power of Advertising
Where's the cerebellum?
The Power of Advertising
Aha! 50% of all neurons (note grey matter!)
“Whereas the cerebellar connections to frontal motor areas enable the cerebellum to improve motor skills, cerebellar connections to association areas of the prefrontal cortex can enable the cerebellum to improve mental skills.”
-- Leiner, Leiner, & Dow (Behav Neurosci, 1986)
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Anatomical links between cerebellum and prefrontal cortex (PFC), not just motor cortex (MC).
Polysynaptic mapping functional MRI (fMRI) of monkey brain in human brain
Strick & Fiez, 2009 Krienen & Buckner, 2009
MC inject PFC inject
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
PFC - Cerebellar loopsPolysynaptic mapping Human DTI
Pathology in psychiatric populations
Autism, ADHD, Schizophrenia, Fragile X, etc.
“Guilt by association”
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Methods developed around 1980 to observe function, not just structure.
Functional Neuroimaging: fMRI
Measure oxygen use by brain.
What part of the brain is active when you think?
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Petersen et al., 1988
Cerebellar activity when speaking.
Cerebellar activity when thinking.
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Hundreds of fMRI studies show cerebellar activation even Hundreds of fMRI studies show cerebellar activation even when movement is absent or is “equated” between when movement is absent or is “equated” between experimental and control conditions.experimental and control conditions.
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Neuropsychology: Behavior
Traditional assessment of ataxia:
Motor exam
New assessments:
Evaluate motor, cognitive, emotion
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Neuropsychology: Behavior
Deficits on range of neuropsychological assessments.
Cerebellar cognitive affective syndromeSchmahmann (1991)
Lines of Evidence
Neuroanatomy: Structure
Neuroimaging: Physiology
Neuropsychology: Behavior
Deficits on range of neuropsychological assessments.
Cerebellar cognitive affective syndromeSchmahmann (1991)
** Mixed bag of results.-- Many individuals and even group studies show no impairment.-- Bias to publish positive results.
Neuropsychological evaluation of people with acute ataxia one week after stroke.
P
erfo
rman
ce
P
oor
N
orm
al
Change in performance at re-test after 1-9 months.
1 Week 1-9 months later
P
erfo
rman
ce
Poo
r
Nor
mal
Half empty or half full? Implications of such rapid recovery?
1 Week 1-9 months later
P
erfo
rman
ce
Poo
r
Nor
mal
Most common persistent cognitive problem is with "executive function".
1 Week 1-9 months later
P
erfo
rman
ce
Poo
r
Nor
mal
Executive Function
-- working memory (short term memory)
-- planning
-- multi-tasking
Functions associated with prefrontal cortex
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
Is the relationship
-- Indirect: correlated but not causal
-- Direct: correlated and causal
1. Indirect hypotheses
a. Cortical atrophy seen in some patients.
-- Multi-system atrophy-- SCA2
Lessons from autism:
Cerebellar atrophy does not mean that cerebellar dysfunction causes autism.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
1. Indirect hypotheses
a. Cortical atrophy seen in some patients.
-- Multi-system atrophy-- SCA2
b. Loss of cerebellar tissue disrupts activity in linked parts of cortex.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
1. Indirect hypotheses
a. Cortical atrophy seen in some patients.
-- Multi-system atrophy-- SCA2
b. Loss of cerebellar tissue disrupts activity in frontal cortex.
c. Resource allocation.Everything is multi-tasking in ataxia!
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
2. Direct hypotheses:
Causal contribution of cerebellum to cognition
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
2. Direct hypotheses:
Causal contribution of cerebellum to cognition.
a. Thinking through internal movement.
** Give TEST **
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
2. Direct hypotheses:
Causal contribution of cerebellum to cognition.
a. Thinking through internal movement.
Memory list:
2 - 6 - 8 - 5 - 4 - 7 - 1
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
2. Direct hypotheses:
Causal contribution of cerebellum to cognition.
a. Thinking through internal movement.
Loss of coordinated "internal movement"(poor rehearsal)
People with ataxia are much more impaired on working memory tasks when rehearsal is emphasized.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
2. Direct hypotheses:
a. Thinking through internal movement.
b. Working memory for action.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
WM in Perception WM in Action
2. Direct hypotheses:
a. Thinking through internal movement.
b. Working memory for action.
Planning requires retrieval of required actions.
e.g., cooking dinner
Without cerebellar signals about how to produce the action, the frontal lobes have difficulty keeping the goal in mind.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
Conclusions
1. Changes in cognition can accompany ataxia.
Not true for all individuals.
But, as a group, problems with executive function.
2. Unclear if changes are an indirect or direct consequence of cerebellar atrophy.
** Could be a combination of many factors.
3. Identifying factors is important for
-- Understanding cerebellar function.
-- Designing rehabilitation/training programs.
The Plug
Cognition and Action lab at UC Berkeley is always looking for new participants!
Just google “Rich Ivry” to find our webpage.
Or stop by our table, just outside.
** Testing going on this weekend **
2. Direct hypotheses:
Cerebellar contributions to cognition.
a. Thinking through internal movement.
b. Working memory for action.
Relating executive function to cerebellar degeneration?
Go on to develop dif WM ideas
1) Secondary to other system atrophy
e.g., SCA2, MSA (cortical involvement
2) cerebellar related
a) rehearsal: motor hypo
But not sufficient
b) response prep (WM for action)
Anatomy
Traditional View: Cerebellum part of motor system.
New evidence: Cerebellum has connections to parts of cerebral cortex that are not part of primary motor pathways.
Neurological Assessment of People with Ataxia
Traditional tests: Focus on balance and coordination.
Newer emphasis: Include assessments of non-motor function.
Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (Schmahmann)
Syndrome describing wide range of cognitive and emotional problems observed in some individuals with cerebellar degeneration or other types of cerebellar injury.
Problems in memory, problem solving, expression of emotion.
Highly variable from individual to individual.
Change in performance in stroke patients:Visit 1: First week after stroke.Visit 2: After 1-9 month recovery period.
Half empty or half full? Implications of such rapid recovery?
Poo
r
Per
form
ance
Goo
d
Exploring the cause of cognitive problems in ataxia.
Three examples:
1. memory
2. attention
3. skill learning
People with ataxia have difficulty on such tasks.
Does cerebellum play a role in these cognitive processes?
Or are the these problems related to motor deficits.
Memory
Long-term memory: stored knowledge
Working memory:
Maintenance of information that is important for current task.
e.g., making a 3-course dinnerremembering a phone number
Memory
Long-term memory: stored knowledge
Working memory:
Maintenance of information that is important for current task.
e.g., making a 3-course dinnerremembering a phone number
Individuals with ataxia have problems with working memory.
Get volunteer (who looks away from screen):
Get volunteer (who looks away from screen):
1. 4 8 6 5 8 3 2 7 (immediate)
Get volunteer (who looks away from screen):
1. 4 8 6 5 8 3 2 7 (immediate)
2. 3 6 2 9 5 4 9 1 (softly)
Get volunteer (who looks away from screen):
1. 4 8 6 5 8 3 2 7 (immediate)
2. 3 6 2 9 5 4 9 1 (softly)
3. 5 1 9 3 2 6 4 6 (10 sec delay)
Get volunteer (who looks away from screen):
1. 4 8 6 5 8 3 2 7 (immediate)
2. 3 6 2 9 5 4 9 1 (softly)
3. 5 1 9 3 2 6 4 6 (10 sec delay)
2. 7 2 4 8 4 9 5 3 (while repeating “ACARM”)
Doing badly on working memory test doesn’t mean you have problem with working memory.
“softly” example.
Doing badly on working memory test doesn’t mean you have problem with working memory.
“softly” example.
Working memory problem in ataxia is with rehearsal.When rehearsal is disrupted during memory testing, people with ataxia do as well as control
participants.
Doing badly on working memory test doesn’t mean you have problem with working memory.
“softly” example.
Working memory problem in ataxia is with rehearsal.When rehearsal is disrupted during memory testing, people with ataxia do as well as control
participants.
Imagined or internal action using same parts of brain as real action.
“Ataxic” inner speech.
Regions of the cerebellum that are active during word rehearsal task and finger tapping.
Motoric regions, even if different
Exploring the cause of cognitive problems in ataxia.
Three examples:
1. working memory
2. attention
Multi-tasking.
Rapidly changing focus of attention.
Exploring the cause of cognitive problems in ataxia.
Three examples:
1. working memory
2. attention
Multi-tasking.
Rapidly changing focus of attention.
Cognitive dysmetria hypothesis:
Ataxia disrupts mental coordination, similar to how it disrupts motor coordination.
Measuring Attention ShiftingMeasuring Attention Shifting
Press button for
Low Tones (Condition 1)
Measuring Attention ShiftingMeasuring Attention Shifting
Press button for
Low Tones (Condition 1)
Red Squares (Condition 2)
Measuring Attention ShiftingMeasuring Attention Shifting
Press button for
Low Tones (Condition 1)
Red Squares (Condition 2)
Alternate responding to red squares and low tones. (Condition 3)
Problem is much more pronounced with divided attention.
50
60
70
80
90
100
Focused Divided
Attention Condition
% C
orr
ect
Res
po
nse
s
Controls Ataxics
Modified Attention Shifting: Modified Attention Shifting: Reducing Motor RequirementsReducing Motor Requirements
People with ataxia show large improvement when attention demands are held constant but motor requirements are reduced.
50556065707580859095100
1-Response 2-Responses
Controls Ataxics
People with ataxia show large improvement when attention demands are held constant but motor requirements are reduced.
Making responses requires attention!
50556065707580859095100
1-Response 2-Responses
Controls Ataxics
Exploring the cause of cognitive problems in ataxia.
Three examples:
1. memory
2. attention
3. skill learning
Problems in motor learning is classic symptom of ataxia.
But is this true for all types of motor learning?
Sequence Learning
Press key corresponding to position of asterisk. Repeat 60 times.
Sequence: Asterisks follow repeating pattern.
Random: Positions chosen at random.
Sequence Learning
Press key corresponding to position of asterisk. Repeat 60 times.
Sequence: Asterisks follow repeating pattern.
Random: Positions chosen at random.
Slower responses on Random block provides measure of learning.
People with ataxia do not show learning on this task.
Ataxic
Non-ataxic
People with ataxia do not show learning on this task.
Ataxic
Non-ataxic
Puzzle since learning is one of pattern recognition (like Michael Jordan) more than finger coordination.
People with ataxia do not show learning on this task.
Ataxic
Non-ataxic
Puzzle since learning is one of pattern recognition (like Michael Jordan) more than finger coordination.
Related to working memory problems?
Simplify working memory demands:
Respond by directly pointing to location of the filled circle.
Simplify working memory demands:
Respond by directly pointing to location of the filled circle.
People with ataxia are slower.
But show excellent learning!
Two different questions:
1. Do people with ataxia have difficulty on non-motor tasks?
Yes. Performance is below normal on wide range of tasks.
Two different questions:
1. Do people with ataxia have difficulty on non-motor tasks?
2. Are basic cognitive abilities compromised in individuals with ataxia?
A skeptic’s response: Cognitive problems may be secondary to motor
problems. Memory: Problems related to rehearsal,
internal movement
Attention and Skill Learning: Demands to attend to movements.
Two different questions:
1. Do people with ataxia have difficulty on non-motor tasks?
2. Are basic cognitive abilities compromised in individuals with ataxia?
A skeptic’s response: Cognitive problems may be secondary to motor
problems. Memory: Problems related to rehearsal,
internal movement
Attention and Skill Learning: Demands to attend to movements.
** Understanding the underlying cause can be useful for developing strategies for rehabilitation.
CognAc is always looking for new participants!
Email: [email protected]
Or just google “Rich Ivry” and you will get to the lab.
Control participant
Person with ataxia
Control participant
Person with ataxia
Variable patterns of cerebellar degeneration.
Why study cognition and action together?
Traditional view: Divide brain by task domain: Cerebellum as part of “motor” system.Other areas involved in perception, memory, etc.
Why study cognition and action together?
Traditional view: Divide brain by task domain: Cerebellum as part of “motor” system.Other areas involved in perception, memory, etc.
Ataxia: Difficulty producing coordinated actions.Difficulty learning new motor skills.But also reports of cognitive problems with language, planning, emotion…
Why study cognition and action together?
Traditional view: Divide brain by task domain: Cerebellum as part of “motor” system.Other areas involved in perception, memory, etc.
Ataxia: Difficulty producing coordinated actions.Difficulty learning new motor skills.But also reports of cognitive problems with language, planning, emotion…
Difficult to separate movement and cognition.What made Michael Jordan such a great basketball
player?
Attention Demands: More Equal More
Response Demands: More More Less
Bischoff-Grethe et al., 2002