the choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

27
Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system Professor Dr.-Ing. Rudi Karpf ete.a Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Lich (D) Waste to Energy 2019 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Upload: others

Post on 19-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

The choice of an appropriate flue

gas treatment system

Professor Dr.-Ing. Rudi Karpf

ete.a Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Lich (D)

Waste to Energy 2019

21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Page 2: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

IntroductionDesign and characteristics

Page 3: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

System matrix for the separation of different pollutants

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

() conditionally suitable or

{x} dust-carrying heavy metals1) clean dust collector

ComponentsElectrostatic

precipitator1)Fabric filter1) Sorption filter

Solid/moving bed

filterScrubber SNCR SCR

Dust x xx

(x)

HClx

(x) x

HFx

(x) x

SO2

xx x

NOXx (x) x x

Hg xx

x x

Cd, Tl {x} {x}x

x {x}

Sb - Sn {x} {x}x

x {x}

As - Cr {x} {x}x

x {x}

PCDD/PCDF {x} {x}x

x x x

NH3x x x

Page 4: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Characteristics of wet and dry air pollution control systems

Wet system Dry system

Low sorbent consumption (stoichiometry 1), resulting in

low residue volumes

Larger sorbent consumption (stoichiometry SRII 1.6 to>

2), resulting in higher residue volumes

Expensive additives (e.g. NaOH) Less expensive additives (e.g. Ca(OH)2)

High separation capacity for HCl and SO2 Good separation capacity

Selective deposition No selective deposition

Multi-stage system Single-stage system

Complex effluent treatment/disposal Simple and robust components

Usually requires dust pre-separation Requires no dust pre-separation

Greater dust/aerosol emissions Low maintenance demand

PCDD/PCDF separation in conjunction with packed

scrubbers and HOK dosage

Very good separation for heavy metals and

PCDD/PCDF using HOK

Greater space requirements No wet stack required, hence no steam plume

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Page 5: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Classification of flue gas cleaning technologies for HCl, SOx and HF control

Source: VDI 3460, 1; 2014

Page 6: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

SNCR

SNCRBoiler

Filter

Hex

NaHCO3 + AC

Residues

R

Dry system

SNCR

Recirculation

Boiler

Filter

Ca(OH)2 + AC

Residues

H2O

Cond. dry system

Source: fisia-babcock

Waste water

Boiler

Filter

AC

ResiduesRecirculation

SC1 SC2Hex

Lime Slurry

Wet system

BoilerSNCR

Filter

AC

Residues

SA

Lime slurry+H2O

Spray absorption system (semi-wet)

Recirculation

Ca(OH)2

Page 7: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Plant configurations for SCR

Boiler

ESP

Fabric filter

Fabric filter

or

stackScrubber

1 2 3 4

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

High Dust Low Dust / High SOx Low Dust / Low SOx Tail End

Page 8: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Process overviewof the used flue gas treatment systems

in EuropaBasis are data from the State-of-the-

Art-Report "Waste-to-Energy", Statistics

6th Edition August 2012 from ISWA

Page 9: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Comparison of dedusting procedures behind waste incineration plants

in European countries

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

No fabric filter

Page 10: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Comparison of denitrification processes behind waste incineration

plants in European countries

Berliner Abfallwirtschafts- und Energiekonferenz 28.-29. Januar 2013

Page 11: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Comparison of the processes for the separation of the acidic

constituents of harmful gases HCl, HF, SO2 behind waste incineration

plants in European countries

Berliner Abfallwirtschafts- und Energiekonferenz 28.-29. Januar 2013

Dominance of wet processes or hybrid processes

Page 12: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Comparison of the processes for the separation of heavy metals, dioxins /

furans behind waste incineration plants in European countries

Berliner Abfallwirtschafts- und Energiekonferenz 28.-29. Januar 2013

Page 13: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Selection criteria and procedures of

emission control systems

Page 14: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

underlying exhaust parameters for the decision matrices

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Component Unit NORMAL HIGH

TOC mg/m3 STP,dry 10 5

CO mg/m3 STP,dry 50 25

HCl mg/m3 STP,dry 10 5

HF mg/m3 STP,dry 1 0,5

SO2mg/m3

STP,dry 50 20

Dust mg/m3 STP,dry 5 3

NOXmg/m3

STP,dry 200 100

Hg mg/m3 STP,dry 0,03 0,01

Cd, Tl mg/m3 STP,dry 0,05 0,025

Sb - Sn mg/m3 STP,dry 0,5 0,25

As - Cr mg/m3 STP,dry 0,05 0,025

Dioxine/Furane ng/m3 STP,dry 0,1 0,01

Page 15: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Pollutants Normal High

HCl 1000 – 2500 mg/m³STP, dry > 2500 mg/m³STP, dry

SO2 300 – 1000 mg/m³STP, dry > 1000 mg/m³STP, dry

HF 50 – 150 mg/m³STP, dry > 150 mg/m³STP, dry

Page 16: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Characteristics for the use of lime and sodium bicarbonate( + good; 0 neutral; - unfavorable)

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Characteristics of the plant / infrastructure Ca(OH)2 NaHCO3

low additiv costs + -

high waste disposal costs - +

downstream SCR-DeNOx-system +1)/- +

maximum use of heat energy +1)/0 +

Use of dry fuel/waste +/- +

For smallest HF- und SO2-Emissions + -

Hg-removal + -

System with buffer effect (Emissionen) + -

1) using the PTU method (PTU = partial dew point underrange,

process patented by ete.a)

Page 17: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Decision matrix for selecting a process(+ good, - unfavorable; Sprayabsorption (SPA), Fabric Filter (FF))

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Low additive costs

High costs for residue disposal

No need for heat energy SCR

Highest heat recovery

Low pressure drop

No water consumption

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

SPA lime milk/ lime FF A

FF Bicar / FF Lime B

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

2-stage dry process when a wet process is not allowed

Page 18: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Decision matrix for selecting a process(+ good, - unfavorable; Sprayabsorption (SPA), Fabric Filter (FF))

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Page 19: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Challenges for flue gas treatment systems in the future

Increasing energy efficiency will continue to be another challenge for flue gas

treatment processes!

A very comprehensive and detailed study on the net emissions balance as a

function of energy expenditure shows that the energy expenditure for a multi-

stage flue gas treatment system with minimum emissions is not necessarily

higher than that of single-stage systems!

Modern-day and future know-how regarding the design of efficient

plants will not necessarily imply the development of new processes,

but rather place a focus on the intelligent combination and

configuration of proven process stages

Page 20: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Challenges for flue gas treatment systems in the future

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

One example of this is the Delfzijl waste incineration facility in the Netherlands.

Boiler

Fabric Filter t = 240°C

Residue

NaHCO3

Fabric Filter t = 120°C

Residue

Ca(OH)2 + Coke

Recirculation

Fan Stack

SCR t = 240°C

Eco

Mill

NH4OH

H2O

Page 21: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Challenges for flue gas treatment systems in the future

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

.. as regards the future selection of sites

for new plants, this implies that plants

should be built at sites where a suitable

infrastructure including energy sinks

exist!

My appeal is …

Page 22: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Hamburg

KielTornesch

Ahrenlohe Rostock

Schwedt

Berlin

Stapelfeld

Neustadt

Kamp Lintfort

Oberhausen

Krefeld

Premnitz

Magdeburg

Staßfurt

Rüdersdorf

Großräschen

LautaLeuna

Zorbau

Helmstedt

Hannover

HamelnMinden

Hamm

Iserlohn

Herten

HagenEssen

Solingen

Wuppertal

Köln-HürthKöln

Düsseldorf

Bonn

Weisweiler

Kassel

Witzenhausen

Heringen

Frankfurt.a.M

Offenbach

Biebesheim

Mainz

Mannheim

Pirmasens

Neunkirchen

Velsen

Stuttgart

BöblingenUlm

Weißenhorn

Burgau

Augsburg

Freiburg

Ingolstadt

Nürnberg

Bamberg

Coburg

Schweinfurt

Würzburg

Burgkirchen

GeisenbullachMünchen

Rosenheim

Kempten

Salzbergen

Bremerhafen

Lahr

Bremen

Göppingen

ete.a Customers

Schwarzheide/BASF

Marl

market share on wte plants

in Germany more than 50 %

Page 23: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

References in the World

Guadeloupe

Brasil

Netherlands

France

Italy

Czech Republic

Austria/

Switzerland

Belgium

Singapore

Japan

Page 24: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Summary

Page 25: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Which method or concept is ultimately the right

one depends on many plant- and location-

specific factors and is not subject to a flat rate.

Pablo Picasso's quote "If there was only one

truth, one could not paint a hundred images on

the same subject" reflects causality very well.

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic

Page 26: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

HerzLICHe Grüße

aus dem Herzen der Natur!

Ingenieurgesellschaft für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung mbH

Fürstliches Hofgut Kolnhausen 12

35423 Lich

+49 6404-658164

+49 6404-658165

[email protected]

www.ete-a.de

Page 27: The choice of an appropriate flue gas treatment system

Ingenieurbüro für Energie- und Umweltengineering & Beratung

Thank you for your attention

Waste to Energy 2019 │ 21 and 22 March 2019, Clarion Congress Hotel Prague, Czech Republic