the composition of the continental...
TRANSCRIPT
The Composition of the Continental Crust
The The Composition of Composition of the Continental the Continental CrustCrust
Roberta L. RudnickGeochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of GeologyUniversity of Maryland
Apollo 17 view of Earth
Rationale: Why is studying crust composition
important?
Total
Crust
Mantle
*Calculated assuming seismological and geochemical reference models
From Chen, 2006, Earth, Moon & Planets
Fractional geo-neutrino flux at SNO+*
Most of the geo-neutrino signal in continental-based detectors originates in the continental crust
Oceanic Crust
How is Earth’s Crust Made?
?Convergent margin processes?
Intraplate processes?
Continental
Return flow viaSubduction (sediments, subduct. erosion)?Density foundering?
What do we “know” about the continental crust?
Continental Crust, physical:
Ancient (on average 2 Ga, ≤4 Ga) ~40 km thick (20-80+ km)Low density: ~2.7 g/cm3
High standing (+800 m)
Continental Crust, chemical:
Compositionally stratifiedDiverse rock types Composition: “Andesite”
(SiO2 ~60 wt.%)
Upper Crust
Lower Crust
http://www.ub.es/ggac/research/piris
Lower velocitiesLower density“granitic”
Higher velocitiesHigher density“basaltic”
Shuttle view of granite Shuttle view of granite intruding metamorphic intruding metamorphic basement, northern basement, northern Chile.Chile.
Continental Continental crust:crust:Lots of heterogeneity!
Every rock type known on Earth occurs in continental crust
How is crust composition determined?
1. Crustal growth scenarios (Taylor & McLennan, 1985)
1. Empirical models (Christensen & Mooney, 1995; Wedepohl, 1995, Rudnick & Fountain, 1995; Rudnick & Gao, 2003, and others)
Models of Crust Composition
25% “Andesite model”75% Archean crust
Archean crust: Mixture of Archean basalt & Archean granite*Assume 50% of 40 mWm-2 surface heat flow
derives from crust: 66% basalt, 33% granite
Taylor & McLennan Recipe
*A special type of granite called tonalite, with relatively low K, Th and U
Upper crust: grid sampling, sedimentary rocks, γ-ray spectroscopy
Deep crust: determined from seismic velocities, geochemistry of high-grade metamorphic rocks, surface heat flow data
Empirical Models
Upper crust major elements: grid sampling
Space shuttle view of Thunder Bay, Ontario
Eade & Fahrig (1973): >14,000 grid samples in outcrop-weighted composites, analyzed for
major & a few trace elements
Upper crust major elements: Geological sampling
Gao et al. (1998): >11,000 samples from major geological units in eastern China, analyzed for
major and many trace elements
Upper continental crustis granitic (~67 wt.% SiO2)
Upper crustal estimates: Major elements
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4 Shaw et al.Eade & Fahrig
Taylor & McLennan
Nor
mal
ized
toU
CR
&G
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Si Al Fe Mg Ca Na K
BorodinCondieGao et al.Ronov & YaroshevskyN
orm
aliz
edto
UC
R&
G
Wt. % K2O:
2.7 to 3.4%
Rudnick & Gao: 2.8 wt.%
Upper crust trace elements (e.g., Th, U)
Inherently difficult to estimate due to•Orders of magnitude variation•Non-modal distributions
Global averages from fine-grained terrigenoussediments (e.g., shales, loess, glacial till)
Regional averages from γ-ray spectroscopy
Analyses of sedimentary rocks
Quantitative transport of insoluble elements from site of weathering to deposition.
Th: insolubleK, U: soluble
r2 = 0.15
K2O
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
La (ppm)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Th
r2 = 0.82
101.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
U
r2 = 0.48
Rudnick & Gao, 2003
Taylor & McLennan, 1985
Gao et al., 1998
Loess: samples of averaged upper crust?
La (ppm)
Equivalent U (µg/g)Data courtesy of Canadian Geological Survey
Gamma-ray spectroscopy
Upper crustal estimates: U & Th
Th ppm:8.6 to 10.8 (10.5)U ppm:1.5 to 2.8 (2.7)
Th/U = 3.8-7.2 (3.9) 0.5
1.0
1.5
Tl Pb Bi Th U
Actinides & heavy metals
ShawGao et al.Taylor & McLennan
Eade & FahrigCondie
Weathering?
U6+
Deep crustal estimates
Challenging due to•heterogeneity•orders of magnitude variation in concentrations•non-modal distributions•inaccessibility
Global averages from integrating seismic velocities, lithologies and geochemistry
Regional averages from surface heat flow data
Granulite FaciesTerrains
Granulite FaciesXenoliths
Deep Crustal Samples
Ross Taylor, KSZ, Ontario, 1983
Shukrani Manya, Univ. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
The great xenolith hunt
Profs. Gao and Wu, Shanxi, China
Bill McDonough, Queensland, Australia
102030405060708090
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
102030405060708090
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Mg#Mg#
Mg#Mg#
GranuliteGranulite FaciesFaciesTerranesTerranesArcheanArchean
PostPost--ArcheanArchean
Lower Lower crustalcrustalxenolithsxenoliths
SiOSiO22 (wt. %)(wt. %)
22..66 22..88 33..00 33..22 33..44 33..66
66..00
66..55
77..00
77..55
88..00
88..55
Mafic rocks
Felsic rocks
Eclogites
m=21
m=22
Ultramafic rocks
VVpp((m/sm/s))
Density (g/cmDensity (g/cm33))
Upper Mantle
Basalt
Granite Metapelites(meta-shales)
Rifted MarginContractional Shield & Platform
Paleozoic OrogenRift
ExtensionalArc
Forearc0
20
40
60
KmVp
6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2
Middle and Lower Crust -- Seismic evidence
From Rudnick & Fountain, 1995
Nor
mal
i zed
t oR
&G
Weaver & TarneyShaw et al.Gao et al.Rudnick & Fountain
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Si Al Fe Mg Ca Na K
Comparison of middle crustal models:Major elements
Wt. % K2O: 2.1 to 3.4%
Rudnick & Gao: 2.3 wt.%
Th ULi Rb Cs Sr Ba Pb
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Li Rb Cs Sr Ba Pb
2.6
Comparison of middle crustal models:Alkali, alkaline Earth & Actinides
Weaver & TarneyShaw et al.Gao et al.Rudnick & Fountain
Th ppm: 6.1 to 8.4 (6.5)U ppm: 0.9 to 2.2 (1.3)Th/U = 5.0
Nor
mal
i zed
t oR
&G
Nor
mal
i zed
toR
&F
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Si Al Fe Mg Ca Na K
Weaver & TarneyShaw et al.Gao et al.WedepohlTaylor & McLennan
Terrains and models
Comparison of lower crustal models:Major elements
Wt. % K2O: 0.6 to 1.8%
Rudnick & Gao: 0.6 wt.%
4.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Li Rb Cs Sr Ba Pb Th UShaw et al.Gao et al.
Taylor & McLennanWedepohl
Weaver & Tarney
Median xenolith
Comparison of lower crustal models:Trace elements
Th ppm: 0.4 to 6.6 (1.2)U ppm: 0.05 to 0.9 (0.2)Th/U = 6.0
Nor
mal
i zed
t oR
&F
Surface Heat Flow Data
Perry et al., 2006; 2009
Local heat production of upper crust @ SNO+ is ~12 mWm-2 higher than Superior Province average*, doubling the flux of upper crustal geo-neutrinos
*local heat production ~ global continental crust
Surface Heat Flow Data & Xenolith Thermobarometry
U-bearing accessory minerals lose the daughter-product (Pb*) when they reside above their “closure temperature” (Tc)
Determining the amount of Pb* in such minerals from deep-seated xenoliths allows the temperature of the Moho to be determined
TitaniteTc ~550oC
ApatiteTc ~420oC
Surface Heat Flow Data & Xenolith Thermobarometry
Example from Tanzanianlower crustal xenoliths
Apatite (Tc ~ 420oC) has no Pb*
Surface Heat Flow Data & Xenolith Thermobarometry
Example from Tanzanianlower crustal xenoliths
Titanite (Tc < 580oC) has retained Pb* since >300 Ma
Surface Heat Flow Data & Xenolith Thermobarometry
Example from Tanzanianlower crustal xenoliths
Present-day Moho temperature = 420 to 580oC
Crustal heat production≤ 0.5 µWm-3
cf. ~0.9 µWm-3 in average continental crust
Conclusions• Global models converge for K, but not Th
and U
• Largest uncertainties are for deep crust
• Geo-neutrino community needs regional models based on a variety of methods• γ-ray spectroscopy (surface)
• Seismic + geochemistry (whole crust)
• Heat-flow + thermochronology (whole crust)
Composition of the Continental Crust
Christensen Rudnick & Wedepohl Taylor & Rudnick && Mooney Fountain 1995 McLennan Gao, 2003
1995 1995 1985, 1995
SiO2 62.4 60.1 62.8 57.1 60.6Al2O3 14.9 16.1 15.4 15.9 15.9FeOT 6.9 6.7 5.7 9.1 6.7MgO 3.1 4.5 3.8 5.3 4.7CaO 5.8 6.5 5.6 7.4 6.4Na2O 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.1K2O 2.1 1.9 2.7 1.3* 1.8
Mg# 44.8 54.3 54.3 50.9 55.3
*Updated by McLennan and Taylor, 1996
Th 5.6 8.5 3.5 5.6U 1.4 1.7 0.9 1.3
Rudnick & Clarke*Gao, 2003 1889
SiO 2 60.6 60.2TiO 2 0.7 0.6Al 2O 3 15.9 15.3FeO T 6.7 7.3MnO 0.10 0.10MgO 4.7 4.6CaO 6.4 5.5Na 2O 3.1 3.3K 2O 1.8 3.0P 2O 5 0.13 0.23
Mg# 55.3 53.0
*Clarke, Frank Wigglesworth, for whom the Clarke medal is named
F.W. Clarke, 1847-1931
Composition of the Continental Crust
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5
Rud
nick
& F
ount
ain
Christensen & Mooney
Average Vp for lower crustal rock types
(0oC, 600 MPa) Eclogite
Mafic gt granulite
Felsic granulite
Felsic amphiboliteMetapelite - Amphbolite facies
Mafic granuliteAnorthosite
Amphibolite