the conservative ascendancy

53
Summary (Review) Racism has long been common in Texas, just as it has been common across the South, common throughout the nation, and common in various ways all over the world. In Texas, the struggle for civil rights was somewhat unique in that it unfolded not with the context of a black/white binary, but along far more diverse lines, particularly among the state’s Mexican-American community. The fight for civil rights and political equality accelerated in Texas during the years immediately following World War II. The first major front was fought in the realm of school desegregation, but extended to other areas during the 1960s and 1970s.

Upload: others

Post on 19-Apr-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Conservative Ascendancy

Summary (Review)

◼ Racism has long been common in Texas, just as it has been common across the South, common throughout the nation, and common in various ways all over the world.

◼ In Texas, the struggle for civil rights was somewhat unique in that it unfolded not with the context of a black/white binary, but along far more diverse lines, particularly among the state’s Mexican-American community.

◼ The fight for civil rights and political equality accelerated in Texas during the years immediately following World War II. The first major front was fought in the realm of school desegregation, but extended to other areas during the 1960s and 1970s.

Page 2: The Conservative Ascendancy

Rise of the Republican Right

© Sean P. Cunningham, Ph.D.

Page 3: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 4: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 5: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 6: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 7: The Conservative Ascendancy

Congressional Delegations◼ 1961:

◼ House: 21-1 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 1-1 (Democratic/Republican)

◼ 1981:◼ House: 19-5 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 1-1 (Democratic/Republican)

◼ 2001:◼ House: 17-13 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 2-0 (Republican)

◼ 2021:◼ House: 23-13 (Republican)◼ Senate: 2-0 (Republican)

Page 8: The Conservative Ascendancy

State Legislature◼ 1961:

◼ House: 148-2 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 31-0 (Democratic)

◼ 1981:◼ House: 113-37 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 24-7 (Democratic)

◼ 2001:◼ House: 78-72 (Democratic)◼ Senate: 16-15 (Republican)

◼ 2021:◼ House: 82-67 (Republican)◼ Senate: 18-13 (Republican)

Page 9: The Conservative Ascendancy

How did we get here?

◼ 1932-1964:◼ Democrats win White House 7/9

◼ 1968-2004:◼ Republicans win White House 7/10

◼ 1964-1984:◼ Rise of …

◼ “Modern Conservatism”

◼ “Republican Right”

◼ “Two-Party Texas”

Page 10: The Conservative Ascendancy

Overview: Conservatism

◼ reverence for the past, preference for status quo

◼ commitment to traditional values, including religious values

◼ support for free-market capitalism◼ low taxes

◼ national and international competition

◼ private property rights

◼ distrust of government intervention, regulation

◼ vigorous national defense + patriotism

*all points debatable

Page 11: The Conservative Ascendancy

Overview: Liberalism

◼ focus on the future, preference for progress

◼ commitment to individual civil liberties and political rights◼ use of the State to protect and guarantee those rights

◼ support for regulatory capitalism◼ graduated tax system

◼ government oversight to protect against corporate abuses

◼ protectionism and labor rights

◼ cynical of nationalism, exclusionary “hyper-patriotism”

*all points debatable

Page 12: The Conservative Ascendancy

Overview: Texas

◼ Basic Chronology:

◼ 1846 – c. 1938:

◼ Texas dominated by Democratic Party

◼ liberals vs. conservatives

◼ c. 1938 – 1994:

◼ transitional period

◼ 1994 – Present:

◼ Texas dominated by Republican Party

◼ How and Why?

Page 13: The Conservative Ascendancy

Overview: Texas

◼ Standard Thesis =

◼ Texas (and Southern) Democrats have always been conservative.

◼ All Democrats used to be conservative, but over time, northern Democrats became more liberal.

◼ major issue = civil rights + growth of government

◼ At some point, Texas (and Southern) Democrats “switched” parties.

Page 14: The Conservative Ascendancy

Overview: Texas

◼ In reality …

◼ Texas politics has long been multifaceted, multi-ideological, and very complicated.

◼ The importance of certain issues changed over time, as did generational perspectives about which parties represented certain “values.”

◼ (ex: 1930s = economy, 1940s = war, 1950s = communism, etc.)

◼ Beginning in the 1950s and continuing through the 1980s, the Texas Republican Party actively tried to recruit conservative Democrats.

◼ Meanwhile, liberals in the Texas Democratic Party actively recruited liberal Republicans, and also actively supported conservative Republicans in an effort to purge their party of conservatives.

◼ This “switch” took decades to complete.

Page 15: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 16: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 17: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 18: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 19: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 20: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 21: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 22: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 23: The Conservative Ascendancy

Popular Perceptions*

◼ Democratic Party:

◼ populist

◼ “for the forgotten man”

◼ “white supremacy”

◼ “God-Fearing”

◼ party of “tradition”

◼ “Solid South”

◼ generational loyalties

◼ Republican Party:

◼ elitist

◼ “Eastern Establishment”

◼ “Wall Street” / corporate

◼ “privileged extremists”

◼ anti-GOP tradition

◼ “Solid South”

◼ generational hostilities

in Texas (c. 1960)

* “popular” = majority of white voters only

Page 24: The Conservative Ascendancy

John Tower

◼ 1961: elected to U.S. Senate◼ “a fluke”

◼ liberal Democrats: “go fishing”

◼ first Texas Republican to win seat in U.S. Senate since Reconstruction

◼ 1966: re-elected◼ defeats conservative Democrat

◼ 1972: re-elected◼ wins plurality of Mexican American vote

◼ first time for a Republican in Texas history

Page 25: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 26: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 27: The Conservative Ascendancy

“The Unraveling of America”

◼ Political Assassinations◼ 1963: John F. Kennedy

◼ 1965: Malcolm X

◼ 1968: Martin Luther King, Jr.

◼ 1968: Robert F. Kennedy

◼ Civil Rights Movement(s)◼ “Black Power”

◼ Vietnam War◼ antiwar movement

◼ “counterculture”

Page 28: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 29: The Conservative Ascendancy

◼ Election of 1972:

◼ George McGovern:

◼ 37% cut to defense budget

◼ “unilateral” withdrawal from Vietnam

◼ GOP Campaign Strategy:

◼ “liberalism = extremism”

◼ “Acid, Amnesty, and Abortion”

“The Unraveling of America”

Page 30: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 31: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 32: The Conservative Ascendancy

“The Unraveling of America”

◼ John Connally◼ 1972: “Democrats for Nixon”

◼ 1973: leaves Democratic Party

◼ 1973-74: Watergate◼ “government corruption”

◼ 1976 GOP Primary:◼ Reagan vs. Gerald Ford

◼ “conservatives” vs. “establishment moderates”

◼ Reagan wins 67% of vote, 100% of delegates

◼ substantial Democratic “crossover”

Page 33: The Conservative Ascendancy

“The Unraveling of America”

◼ “Culture Wars”◼ “Okie from Muskogee”

◼ Roe v. Wade (1973)

◼ school prayer / private schools

◼ Gay Rights Movement

◼ 1976: Jimmy Carter (D-GA):◼ “peanut farmer”

◼ “born-again Christian”

◼ “Washington Outsider”

Page 34: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 35: The Conservative Ascendancy

“Malaise”

◼ Economic Recessions:◼ “energy crisis”

◼ interest rates: 20%

◼ inflation: 18%

◼ unemployment: 9%

◼ November 1979: ◼ Iran Hostage Crisis

◼ December 1979:◼ Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan

Page 36: The Conservative Ascendancy

“Malaise”

◼ Bill Clements

◼ 1978: elected Governor of Texas

◼ first Republican since Reconstruction

◼ campaign strategy:

◼ GOP “Fusion”

◼ “anti-Jimmy Carter”

Page 37: The Conservative Ascendancy

◼ Democratic Party:◼ elitist

◼ “ivory tower leftists”

◼ secular humanists

◼ party of “special interests”

◼ minorities

◼ “collectivism”

◼ “big government”

◼ “welfare”

◼ Republican Party:◼ populist

◼ the “Silent Majority”

◼ “God-Fearing”

◼ party of “American tradition”

◼ “colorblind”

◼ “individualism”

◼ “states’ rights”

◼ “merit” / hard work

* “popular” = majority of white voters only

Popular Perceptions*in Texas (c. 1980)

Page 38: The Conservative Ascendancy

1980

◼ Reagan defeats Carter◼ carries Texas 55% - 41%

◼ Vice President: George H. W. Bush

Page 39: The Conservative Ascendancy

1984

◼ Reagan defeats Walter Mondale◼ carries Texas 64% - 36%

◼ Republican National Convention (Dallas)

Page 40: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 41: The Conservative Ascendancy

Populist Conservatism

◼ Social Conservatives:◼ “evangelicals”

◼ anticommunist Catholics

◼ Libertarians:◼ distrust / oppose “big government”

◼ (mixed w/ anticommunism)

◼ “Reagan Democrats”:◼ “blue-collar” labor

◼ rural white South

◼ “Fighting …”:◼ “against elitism.”

◼ “for the forgotten man.”

Page 42: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 43: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 44: The Conservative Ascendancy

What happened?

◼ 1945-1963:◼ “The Vital Center”

◼ “The Liberal Consensus”

◼ Foundation = Trust in Government

◼ Pew Research Center:◼ “Do you trust government?”

◼ 1964: 77% = “yes”

◼ 1980: 27% = “yes”

◼ 2011: 15% = “yes”

◼ 2021: 24% = “yes”

Page 45: The Conservative Ascendancy
Page 46: The Conservative Ascendancy

Red Texas

◼ 1986: Bill Clements (elected Governor)

◼ 1988: George H. W. Bush (elected President)

◼ 1990: Ann Richards vs. Clayton Williams

◼ 1994 Midterms:◼ George W. Bush (R) – defeats Ann Richards

◼ Bob Bullock (D) – last Democrat to win statewide election in Texas

Page 47: The Conservative Ascendancy

Red Texas

◼ 1998 Midterms:

◼ Republicans win 27 of 27 statewide races

◼ (have not lost since)

◼ George W. Bush – re-elected with 68%

◼ 27% of African American vote

◼ 49% of Latino vote

◼ becomes leading candidate for GOP presidential nomination

Page 48: The Conservative Ascendancy

Texas Today

◼ 2020 Presidential Election:

◼ Trump: 52%

◼ Biden: 46%

◼ Congressional Delegation:

◼ House: 23-13 (Republican)

◼ Senate: 2-0 (Republican)

◼ State Legislature:

◼ House: 82-67 (Republican)

◼ Senate: 18-13 (Republican)

Page 49: The Conservative Ascendancy

Summary◼ Texas became a Republican state for three main reasons:

◼ 1. Texas liberals finally stopped supporting conservative Democrats and even worked to elect Republicans. Why? To create a viable second party.

◼ 2. A new generation of Texas voters broke with tradition and decided that ideological conviction was more important than partisan loyalty. This generation was motivated by a variety of things, including race and religion.

◼ 3. The Republican Party more effectively marketed itself as the anti-establishment, patriotic defender of national security, free-market economics, rugged individualism, and moral tradition.

◼ Today, Texas is a solidly Republican state; but demographics suggest a contested future.

Page 50: The Conservative Ascendancy

Additional Factors & Recommended Reading

◼ Race / Civil Rights:

◼ Dan T. Carter, The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics (LSU, 1995)

◼ Joseph Crespino, In Search of Another Country: Mississippi and the Conservative Counterrevolution (Princeton, 2007)

◼ Max Krochmal, Blue Texas: The Making of a Multiracial Democratic Coalition in the Civil Rights Era (North Carolina, 2016)

◼ Edward H. Miller, Nut Country: Right-Wing Dallas and the Birth of the Southern Strategy (Chicago, 2015)

Page 51: The Conservative Ascendancy

Additional Factors & Recommended Reading

◼ Religion / Culture:

◼ Donald T. Critchlow, Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade (Princeton, 2005)

◼ Darren Dochuk, From Bible Belt to Sunbelt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism (Norton, 2010)

◼ Kevin M. Kruse, One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America (Basic Books, 2015)

◼ Robert Wuthnow, Rough Country: How Texas Became America’s Most Powerful Bible-Belt State (Princeton, 2014)

Page 52: The Conservative Ascendancy

Additional Factors & Recommended Reading

◼ Economics / “Rustbelt to Sunbelt”:

◼ Jefferson Cowie, Stayin’ Alive: The 1970s and the Last Days of the Working Class(New Press, 2010)

◼ Sean P. Cunningham, American Politics in the Postwar Sunbelt: Conservative Growth in a Battleground Region (Cambridge, 2014)

◼ Matthew D. Lassiter, The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South(Princeton, 2006)

◼ Michelle Nickerson and Darren Dochuk, eds., Sunbelt Rising: The Politics of Space, Place, and Region (Penn, 2011)

Page 53: The Conservative Ascendancy

Additional Factors & Recommended Reading

◼ Others:

◼ Sean P. Cunningham, Cowboy Conservatism: Texas and the Rise of the Modern Right (Kentucky, 2010)

◼ Chandler Davidson, Race and Class in Texas Politics (Princeton, 1990)

◼ Thomas Byrne Edsall and Mary D. Edsall, Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics (Norton, 1991)

◼ George N. Green, The Establishment in Texas Politics: The Primitive Years, 1938-1957 (Oklahoma, 1979)

◼ Lisa McGirr, Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right (Princeton, 2001)