the death penalty

1
646 tar which will mean so much to the young spastic. It may even be an investment, reducing his subsequent calls on the National Insurance funds. Cerebral paretics the world over will always owe a debt to Dr. Winthrop Phelps and Dr. Earl R. Carlson, but the methods of attacking the problem and the estimation of its size which they have worked out for America may or may not prove apposite elsewhere. If the American figures are even approximately applicable to this country, then the eighteen-month-old British Council for the Welfare of Spastics has taken on a difficult task, for it would seem that something like two dozen battalions of children with this form of handicap are waiting to be assessed, trained, and equipped. Fortun- ately the council has an assurance of the warmest support from the Minister of Education personally and from his department, and it cannot be doubted that this is the kind of problem to attract the sympathetic interest of the new regional hospital boards. At a meeting of the section of physical medicine of the Royal Society of Medicine, held on the same day, Dr. P. R. Evans pointed out that the British Council for the Welfare of Spastics is as much concerned with athetoid as with spastic children. The term " athetoid quadri- plegia " is used by some orthopaedists though it horri- fies many neurologists, not to mention scholars. By " diplegia " one writer may mean paralysis of two limbs, while another means paralysis of four. A diplegia is more than twice a monoplegia, and a monoplegia is only half as extensive as a hemiplegia. Attainment of standard nomenclature so far as distribution of the paralysis is concerned should not be hard, but agreement will less readily be obtained in the diagnosis of conditions associated with athetosis. As Dr. Evans remarked, the names are important, for clinical classification must precede 2etiological analysis. Little’s disease is not one condition but a group. At the same meeting Dr. J. H. Crosland discussed the methods of treatment and emphasised the need for all concerned, " from the porter to the person in charge of it all," to work as a team. A bit of speech therapy here, a lesson in drinking there, and a little physiotherapy when the mother can manage to get the crippled child to the department will not produce the best results. The different techniques must be integrated appropriately for each individual patient. THE FIRST TWO YEARS PARENTS puzzled by the apparently irrational behaviour of their youngest children may turn for enlightenment to Dr. Benjamin Spock.’ In explaining early vagaries, he champions the infant with the forth- right vigour of a prophet. First, he condemns the enforced isolation of the mother from her newborn child, by which she comes to feel that " she is of little importance to her baby and that its care can be entrusted only to medical experts " ; and he commends the practice of keeping the crib in the mother’s room " so that she can become familiar with his noises, moods, movements and appetite, and so that she can feed him on the breast when he is hungry, rather than according to the clock." Babies know when they need feeding, and if given a free rein they soon work themselves into a regular routine ; but as Spock says, a less forbidding title for this practice than " the self-demand schedule " will have to be found. The commonest problems during the first year are those of feeding ; and these may be initiated soon after birth by arbitrary insistence on a prescribed formula. " The baby who, every time he falls asleep satisfied, gets the soles of his feet snapped and the nipple stirred vigorously in his mouth begins to lose his enthusiasm 1. Spock, B. J. Amer. med. Ass. March 20, p. 811. for food and to become balky and irritable"; and the end- result may be personality changes in both child and mother. The risk of feeding rebellion is greater when solid foods are first started, for most infants at first doubt the virtues of the new regime ; and the minority of babies who do not subdue this scepticism may enlarge the battle-front by refusing even liquid nourishment. Attempts at forced weaning for which the baby is not ready " often cause bad feeling." Most infants who are nursing at both breast and bottle show their ignorance of nutrition in a preference for the bottle. On the other hand, the baby who has been entirely breast-fed for the first few months is likely, if the breast supply is plentiful, to object urgently to letting a rubber nipple pass his lips. At about nine months infants commonly oppose attempts to supplant bottle by cup ; they " bat the cup away suspiciously or, pretending they have forgotten what to do, let all the milk run down the sides of the chin." This derives from a developing shrewdness which warns the child that the bottle may soon be with- drawn ; and forced withdrawal has unhappy results. Surprisingly to the uninitiated, the breast-fed baby rarely balks at weaning from breast to cup. There are two reasons for this : first, breast and cup are less similar than bottle and cup, and " it is the shift to something similar that an opinionated baby resists in weaning " ; the second reason is that at nine months the baby wants to be done with dependence. He wants to sit up for his spoon-feeding or, if bottle-fed, to take the bottle from his mother’s hand and drain the contents while sitting bolt upright. The second year calls on the parent for fresh resources. Automatic cooperation in the child gives way to a phase of intense exploration, which is assisted by new-found independent locomotion. " He senses he is a separate person, entitled to wishes and a will of his own. He early learns to say No ’ and uses it on all occasions." In becoming more independent, he also becomes aware of his dependence ; and thus he may begin to cry each time his mother leaves the room. His wilfulness is commonly expressed in choosiness at meals ; and here, Spock warns us, temporary dislikes are easily turned into permanent hates by rigid adherence to a balanced diet. Equal tact is required in dealing with a recalcitrant bowel. " It is the child who is naturally irregular whose mother is tempted to put him on too often and to insist that he stay on too long " ; resistance is keenest in those babies who have had painfully hard motions, and ill- judged insistence increases the child’s obstinancy, anxiety, and guiltiness. Training should perhaps be deferred until towards the end of the second year. To many parents Dr. Spock’s opinions will smack of dangerous heterodoxy. In the nursery tradition dies hard : whatever the rights of the case, most parents will defend to the last ditch their rigid time-table for feeding and other functions ; and they are not likely to abandon lightly a wavering authority in trying to contain their infants’ swelling ego. , THE DEATH PENALTY WE trust that the House of Lords will endorse the Commons’ decision to discontinue the death penalty for an experimental period of five years. The arguments for and against capital punishment are too familiar to need restatement, but it will always be impossible to weigh them accurately until the deterrent effect of execution has been measured against that of other penalties under the particular conditions of our own country. As a scientist the doctor will support such a test, and as a humanist he will hope that the - result may justify discontinuance of a revolting practice. Two wars have done much to make us callous, and it is heartening to see this small but significant effort to resume the task of making our society more civilised.

Upload: vankhanh

Post on 02-Jan-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE DEATH PENALTY

646

tar which will mean so much to the young spastic. It

may even be an investment, reducing his subsequentcalls on the National Insurance funds.

Cerebral paretics the world over will always owe adebt to Dr. Winthrop Phelps and Dr. Earl R. Carlson,but the methods of attacking the problem and theestimation of its size which they have worked out forAmerica may or may not prove apposite elsewhere.If the American figures are even approximately applicableto this country, then the eighteen-month-old BritishCouncil for the Welfare of Spastics has taken on a difficulttask, for it would seem that something like two dozenbattalions of children with this form of handicap arewaiting to be assessed, trained, and equipped. Fortun-ately the council has an assurance of the warmest supportfrom the Minister of Education personally and from hisdepartment, and it cannot be doubted that this is thekind of problem to attract the sympathetic interest ofthe new regional hospital boards.- At a meeting of the section of physical medicine of theRoyal Society of Medicine, held on the same day, Dr. P. R.Evans pointed out that the British Council for theWelfare of Spastics is as much concerned with athetoidas with spastic children. The term " athetoid quadri-plegia " is used by some orthopaedists though it horri-fies many neurologists, not to mention scholars. By"

diplegia " one writer may mean paralysis of two limbs,while another means paralysis of four. A diplegia ismore than twice a monoplegia, and a monoplegia isonly half as extensive as a hemiplegia. Attainment ofstandard nomenclature so far as distribution of the

paralysis is concerned should not be hard, but agreementwill less readily be obtained in the diagnosis of conditionsassociated with athetosis. As Dr. Evans remarked,the names are important, for clinical classification mustprecede 2etiological analysis. Little’s disease is not onecondition but a group.At the same meeting Dr. J. H. Crosland discussed the

methods of treatment and emphasised the need for allconcerned, " from the porter to the person in charge ofit all," to work as a team. A bit of speech therapyhere, a lesson in drinking there, and a little physiotherapywhen the mother can manage to get the crippled child tothe department will not produce the best results. Thedifferent techniques must be integrated appropriatelyfor each individual patient.

THE FIRST TWO YEARS

PARENTS puzzled by the apparently irrationalbehaviour of their youngest children may turn for

enlightenment to Dr. Benjamin Spock.’ In explainingearly vagaries, he champions the infant with the forth-right vigour of a prophet. First, he condemns theenforced isolation of the mother from her newborn child,by which she comes to feel that " she is of little importanceto her baby and that its care can be entrusted only tomedical experts " ; and he commends the practice ofkeeping the crib in the mother’s room " so that she canbecome familiar with his noises, moods, movements andappetite, and so that she can feed him on the breastwhen he is hungry, rather than according to the clock."Babies know when they need feeding, and if given afree rein they soon work themselves into a regularroutine ; but as Spock says, a less forbidding title forthis practice than " the self-demand schedule " willhave to be found.The commonest problems during the first year are

those of feeding ; and these may be initiated soon afterbirth by arbitrary insistence on a prescribed formula." The baby who, every time he falls asleep satisfied,gets the soles of his feet snapped and the nipple stirredvigorously in his mouth begins to lose his enthusiasm

1. Spock, B. J. Amer. med. Ass. March 20, p. 811.

for food and to become balky and irritable"; and the end-result may be personality changes in both child andmother. The risk of feeding rebellion is greater whensolid foods are first started, for most infants at firstdoubt the virtues of the new regime ; and the minorityof babies who do not subdue this scepticism may enlargethe battle-front by refusing even liquid nourishment.Attempts at forced weaning for which the baby is notready " often cause bad feeling." Most infants who are

nursing at both breast and bottle show their ignorance ofnutrition in a preference for the bottle. On the otherhand, the baby who has been entirely breast-fed for thefirst few months is likely, if the breast supply is plentiful,to object urgently to letting a rubber nipple pass hislips. At about nine months infants commonly opposeattempts to supplant bottle by cup ; they " bat the cupaway suspiciously or, pretending they have forgottenwhat to do, let all the milk run down the sides of thechin." This derives from a developing shrewdnesswhich warns the child that the bottle may soon be with-drawn ; and forced withdrawal has unhappy results.Surprisingly to the uninitiated, the breast-fed babyrarely balks at weaning from breast to cup. There aretwo reasons for this : first, breast and cup are less similarthan bottle and cup, and " it is the shift to somethingsimilar that an opinionated baby resists in weaning " ;the second reason is that at nine months the babywants to be done with dependence. He wants to situp for his spoon-feeding or, if bottle-fed, to take thebottle from his mother’s hand and drain the contentswhile sitting bolt upright.The second year calls on the parent for fresh resources.

Automatic cooperation in the child gives way to a phaseof intense exploration, which is assisted by new-foundindependent locomotion. " He senses he is a separateperson, entitled to wishes and a will of his own. He

early learns to say No ’ and uses it on all occasions."In becoming more independent, he also becomes awareof his dependence ; and thus he may begin to cry eachtime his mother leaves the room. His wilfulness is

commonly expressed in choosiness at meals ; and here,Spock warns us, temporary dislikes are easily turned intopermanent hates by rigid adherence to a balanced diet.Equal tact is required in dealing with a recalcitrantbowel. " It is the child who is naturally irregular whosemother is tempted to put him on too often and to insistthat he stay on too long " ; resistance is keenest in thosebabies who have had painfully hard motions, and ill-

judged insistence increases the child’s obstinancy, anxiety,and guiltiness. Training should perhaps be deferreduntil towards the end of the second year.To many parents Dr. Spock’s opinions will smack

of dangerous heterodoxy. In the nursery tradition dieshard : whatever the rights of the case, most parents willdefend to the last ditch their rigid time-table for feedingand other functions ; and they are not likely to abandonlightly a wavering authority in trying to containtheir infants’ swelling ego. ,

THE DEATH PENALTY

WE trust that the House of Lords will endorse theCommons’ decision to discontinue the death penalty foran experimental period of five years. The argumentsfor and against capital punishment are too familiar toneed restatement, but it will always be impossibleto weigh them accurately until the deterrent effect ofexecution has been measured against that of otherpenalties under the particular conditions of our own

country. As a scientist the doctor will support sucha test, and as a humanist he will hope that the

- result may justify discontinuance of a revolting practice.Two wars have done much to make us callous, and it isheartening to see this small but significant effort toresume the task of making our society more civilised.