the digital divide: access to digital technology for

43
The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for people in custody February 2018

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for people in custody

Februar y 2018www.oics.wa.gov.au

Level 5, Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street Perth, Western Australia 6000Telephone: +61 8 6551 4200 Facsimile: +61 8 6551 4216

7639 OIC A3 Review cover artwork.indd 1 12/02/2018 12:48 PM

Page 2: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

ISBN: 978-0-9942293-9-7

This report is available on the Office’s website and will be made available, upon request, in alternate formats.

7639 OIC A3 Review cover artwork.indd 2 12/02/2018 12:48 PM

Page 3: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

Contents

Inspector’soverview.........................................................................................................................................i

Executivesummary.........................................................................................................................................iii

Background...............................................................................................................................................iii

KeyFindings.............................................................................................................................................iii

Conclusion..................................................................................................................................................v

Recommendations............................................................................................................................................vi

1 Peopleincustodyhavelimitedaccesstocomputers...............................................................1

1.1 WAprovideslessaccesstocomputersthanotherstates..........................................1

1.2 Variationbetweenfacilitiescausesinequity...................................................................5

2 Educationisdrivingdigitaltechnologyaccessincustody....................................................8

2.1 Accesstodigitaltechnologyiscoordinatedinadulteducation..............................8

2.2 Youngpeopleincustodyhaveinadequateaccesstodigitaltechnology.............9

2.3 Privatelyrunfacilitiesvaryinaccess..............................................................................10

3 Accesstodigitaltechnologyforlegalpurposesisinadequate.........................................12

3.1 Legalprofessionalsfacerestrictionsinprovidingservicestoclients...............13

4 TheDepartmentismissingopportunities.................................................................................15

4.1 Videocommunicationiswidelyusedforcourtappearancesbutnotenoughforvisits....................................................................................................................................................15

4.2 Privatelyoperatedfacilitiesmakegooduseofself-servicekiosks.....................17

4.3 WAhasnotattemptedsecureinternetandintranetaccessforpeopleincustody......................................................................................................................................................19

DepartmentofJusticeresponsetorecommendations.........................................21

Accesstodigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustodybyfacility(informationprovidedbythefacilities)...........................................................................................................................25

Previousinspectionrecommendationsaboutvideocommunication...........30

Methodology...........................................................................................................................31

Bibliography...........................................................................................................................32

Page 4: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

i

Inspector’soverviewDespiteafallingcrimerate,thenumberofpeopleinprisonkeepsrising.Oneofthedriversisthehighnumberofpeoplewhoreturntoprisonafterrelease.Itislogical,therefore,tofocusonreintegratingpeoplefromcustodybackintothecommunity.

Smartuseoftechnologycanhelpachievethisinmanyways.Itcanincreasepeople’sopportunitiestostayincontactwithfamilyandfriendswhileincustody,makingreintegrationlessconfronting.Withtherighttechnology,accesstolegal,healthandgovernmentservicesincustodycanbeincreased.Webbasedsystemsandothertechnologiesofferopportunitiestoincreaseprogramandeducationservicesinthecustodialenvironment.

Unfortunately,WesternAustraliahasnottakenacoordinatedorstrategicapproachtousingdigitaltechnologytoimprovetheseservices.Wearelaggingbehindotherstatesandsomeofourregionalneighbours.

Weunderstandthefiscalpressuresfacinggovernment.Wealsounderstandthatexpandingdigitaltechnologywillhavecosts.However,smartinvestmentcanleadtoefficienciesandlongtermsavings.Inordertodothis,thereneedstobeacommitmentfromtheDepartmentofJusticetolookforopportunitiesandimplementimprovementswherepractical.Thisreviewshowsthatitislikelytobesometimebeforethereissubstantialimprovementforpeopleincustody.

TheDepartment’sresponsetothereportdrawsheavilyonitsinformationcommunicationtechnology(ICT)transformationproject.ThisprojectisunderpinnedbystategovernmentpolicyaimedatmodernisingICTtoreduceinfrastructureduplicationandtoharnesswholeofgovernmentbuyingpowerforICTservices.

However,thefocusofthisprojectislargelyonimprovingICTforstaff.TheonlymentionofICTforpeopleincustodyisinrelationtotheprisonertelephonesystemandoffendereducationservices.Whiletheseimprovementswillbewelcomeitisanarrowfocus.Theroadmapprovidedtoushasnoreferencestomatterssuchasin-celltechnology,determiningthenumberofcomputersneededfortheprisonpopulation,orincreasingvideotechnologyforvisitsforpeopleincustody–whichwereourrecommendations.

Obviously,IsupporttheDepartment’seffortstoimprovetheuseofICTforstaff,monitoring,andsurveillancepurposes.ButIamconcernedthatimprovementsinaccesstodigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustodywillbesloworsidelined.Weliveinthedigitalage,andcontrolledaccesstoICTwillbeanincreasinglynecessaryandpowerfultoolforrehabilitation.

Page 5: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

ii

IfsmartinvestmentintechnologyforpeopleincustodyistobeimprovedinWesternAustralia,planningneedstostartnow.Cleargoalsneedtobeset,andrisksandmitigationstrategiesneedtobeidentifiedanddocumented.Ihopethisreportwillgiveimpetustosuchplanning.

Oneareawhichillustratesthecurrentproblemsistheabilityofpeopleincustodytoaccesslegaldocumentsandotherrecords.Thesedays,themajorityoflegalpracticeiselectronic,notpaper-based.Peopleincustodyhavetherighttoviewsuchmaterialinordertopreparetheircaseordiscussaplea.Lawyerstoldusthat,intheirview,theDepartment’spolicyaboutlawyerstakinglaptopsintoofficialvisitsareas,toshareinformationwithclientsisbothrestrictiveandinconsistentlyapplied.Iampleasedtoreportthat,afterdiscussionswithus,theDepartmentagreedtoreassessitspolicy,andcommittedtoensuringconsistencyatdifferentprisons.

However,IwouldhaveexpectedtohavefoundevidenceofregulardiscussionsbetweentheDepartmentandthelegalprofessiononhowbesttomanagecommunicationsandrisks,andgreateruseoftechnologiessuchasSkype.Iwouldalsohaveexpectedlawyer/clientcommunicationstobepartofcomprehensiveICTplanning.Thatdoesnotappeartobethecaseontheevidenceprovidedtous.Inpart,thatmayreflectthefactthatprisonsandcourtsusedtoberunbyseparategovernmentdepartments.ThenewDepartmentofJusticeisnowresponsibleforboth.Ihopethiswillleadtoimprovedcoordinationandpolicydevelopment.

NeilMorgan

12February2018

Page 6: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

iii

Executivesummary

BackgroundSincetheearly1980stherehavebeenrapidandprofoundtechnologicalchangesinsociety.Digitaltechnologyhasbecomeanintegralpartofourlives.Weuseswipe-cardtechnologyandmobilephonestopayforitemsandservices.Weconductsocialandeconomictransactionsviaemail,web-based,orsocialmediaplatforms.Andwecontinuetoadaptourhomes,workplaces,andlearningenvironmentsastechnologyadvances.

Mostpeopleincustodyarealreadysociallyandeconomicallydisadvantaged.Oftentheyhavelowersocioeconomicstatus,poorhealth,highunemploymentandlowlevelsofeducation(Murphy,2012).Associetymovestowardsdigitisedlearningandworkingenvironments,thedigital,social,andcommunicationdividebetweenpeopleincustodyandtheoutsideworldincreases.Thisresultsinfurtherexclusionofthosewhoarealreadysociallyexcluded.

Inrecentyears,theDepartmentofJustice(formerlytheDepartmentofCorrectiveServices)hasembracedtechnologiessuchaselectronicmonitoringofoffenders,surveillanceandscanningequipment,andcomputerisedcasemanagementandreporting.Usingsuchtechnologiescanimproveefficiencyandserviceoutcomes.However,peopleincustodyhavegainedlittlefromadvancesindigitaltechnology,resultingindigitalinequalitiesandawideningdigitaldivide.

KeyFindingsAccesstodigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustodyinWesternAustraliaispoor

ComparedwithotherAustralianjurisdictionsWesternAustraliahaspooraccesstocomputersandin-celldevices.Onaveragethereisonlyonecomputeraccessibleforevery15peopleheldincustody.

Thereisconsiderablevariationbetweenfacilitiesbasedonhoweachchoosestoprioritiseaccess.Thisfailstoaccountfortheneedsoftheprisonpopulation.Forexample,facilitieswiththelargestnumbersofpeopleonremandhavethepoorestaccesstodigitaltechnologyeventhoughtheyareunconvictedandneedmoreaccesstoelectroniclegalinformationandcomputers.

TheDepartmenthasnottakenacoordinatedorstrategicapproachtoassessingthelevelofneedandrequirementsforcomputeraccessforpeopleincustody.

Page 7: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

iv

Adulteducationisdrivingdigitaltechnologyaccessbutisnotextendingintoyoutheducation

Almostallthecomputersavailabletopeopleincustodyareforeducationpurposes.Mostadultprisonsprovidesomedegreeofaccesstocomputers,e-readers,andinteractivewhiteboardsforeducationpurposes.

TheDepartment’sEducationandVocationalTrainingUnit(EVTU)providesguidanceandgovernancefortheuseofdigitaltechnologytoenhancelearninginadultprisons.Adedicatedstaffmembermaintainsandupgradesequipmentandprovidestechnicalsupportwhenneeded.

However,youngpeopleinBanksiaHilldonotbenefitfromthecoordinationprovidedthroughEVTU.TheDepartmenthasneglectedtheobviousneedforcomputersinyoutheducation.OurJuly2017inspectionfoundlittleprogress1despitetheDepartmenthaving:

• fundsallocatedtofixthesituationsince2015• documentedplanssinceearly2017• assignedresponsibilitytotheKnowledgeandInformationTechnology

directoratetoimplementtheplans(DCS,2017a;DCS,2017b).

Legalservicesarerestrictedduetopoordigitaltechnologyaccess

Peopleincustodycanonlyaccesselectroniclegalinformationandpreparefortheircourtappearancesusingcomputersinlibrariesorcommonareas,oraverylimitednumberofin-celllaptops.

Policystipulatesthatatleastonecomputeristobemadeavailableforthispurposeineachprisonlibrary.Butthereisnoguidanceonhowmanycomputersshouldbeavailablebasedontheprisonpopulation.

Thereisnocentralisedpersonorrolewhoisresponsibleformaintaining,upgrading,orsupportingthesecomputers.Thisresultsinconsiderablevariancebetweenfacilities.

Legalpractitionersreporteddifficultiesinshowingelectronicevidencetoclientsincustody.Theysaidclientsoftendonotseeelectronicmaterialuntiltheyreachcourt.Thiscanreducetheoptionsforearlypleasandextendtimeincustody.

TheDepartmentismissingopportunitiestousedigitaltechnologytoincreasesocialcontactandimprovethedigitalliteracyofpeopleincustody

TheDepartmentusesvideolinksforcourtappearances,bringingsignificantfinancialsavingsincourtcustodyandtransportcosts.Butitmakeslittleuseof

1DuringanOICSvisitinDecember2017,wefoundthecomputerswereoperational.CorrespondencefromtheDepartment,claimsthisoccurredon10July2017whichwasnotconsistentwithwhatwefoundduringourInspection.

Page 8: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

v

videocommunicationtechnologytofacilitatesocialcontactwithpeopleoutsidecustodyorinotherfacilities.

Privately-runfacilitiesuseself-servicekioskstoallowpeopleincustodytomanageappointments,accounts,andordercanteenitems.Thisreducestheadministrativeburdenoncustodialofficers,improvesthedigitalliteracyofpeopleincustody,andpromotespersonalresponsibility.Thesesystemshavebeenasuccessbuthavenotyetbeenintroducedinthestate’spublicfacilities.

ConclusionWesternAustraliahasnotgivensufficientprioritytothedevelopmentofdigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustody.

Thereisnocentralisedcoordinationorstrategy.Asaresult,progresshasbeenadhocandopportunitieshavebeenmissed.Wehavefallenbehindotherstatesandterritories.

Accesstodigitaltechnologyforeducationpurposeshasdrivensomeinnovation,butthishasbeeninconsistent.

Accesstodigitaltechnologyforlegalpurposeshasnotkeptupwithchangesinthecommunityandthecourts.Thegapiswidening,andthishasthepotentialtocauseunnecessarypressureinthejusticesystem.

Page 9: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

vi

Recommendations

Page

1 Identifyandmanagetherisksassociatedwithin-celltechnology,withtheintenttoexpandtheavailabilityofin-cellcomputeraccess.

3

2 Establishamodeltodeterminetheappropriateratioofcomputerstoprisonpopulation,whichaccountsfortheneedsoftheprisoncohort,andincreasethenumberofcomputerswhereneeded.

5

3 ImplementtheplantoupdatedigitaltechnologyatBanksiaHill. 10

4 Identifyacentralisedperson/rolewithresponsibilityformaintaining,upgrading,andsupportinglibrarycomputers.

12

5 DevelopaMemorandumofUnderstandingwithkeylegalbodiestoensureelectroniclegalmaterialcanbeviewedbypeopleincustody.

14

6 Implementawholeofdepartmentsolutiontoincreasevideocommunicationforofficial,social,andinter-prisonvisits.

17

Page 10: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

1

1 Peopleincustodyhavelimitedaccesstocomputers

1.1 WAprovideslessaccesstocomputersthanotherstatesInWesternAustralia,thereisaratioofapproximately15peopleincustodyforeachcomputerinadultprisons.NewSouthWales,Queensland,Victoria,Tasmania,andtheAustralianCapitalTerritoryallhavegreateraccess.2

Figure1ComputersavailableforpeopleincustodyinAustralia

Accesstoin-celltechnologyisparticularlylowinWesternAustralia.In-celltechnologyincludesin-cellfixeddevices,desktopcomputers,andportabledevicessuchaslaptopsortablets.Theseallowpeopleincustodytoexpandtheiraccesstoeducationalandlegalresources.Thiscanreducecompetitionwithotheractivitiesduringtheday,enablingpeopletobalanceworkandstudycommitmentsincustody.Accesstoin-celltechnologyalsomeansusersareunaffectedbyopeninghours,staffunavailability,orlockdowns.

2InformationfromtheNorthernTerritoryandSouthAustraliawasnotavailable.

1:151:12

1:12

1:7

1:7½

1:1½

FUTURE PLANS:Additional 200 preloaded laptops by late 2017800 in-cell technology screens for two new planned facilities1000 computers with intranet for education and legal purposes

26 in cell laptops for educational purposes50 computers with intranet (Rison Prison Complex) 4 computers for entertainment purposes

NOTE: No data available for N.T. and S.A.

Estimated 427 in-cell computers and laptops for education and legal 137 communal computers for vocational training120 laptops plus desktop computer in each library

65 laptops for legal purposes 1000 computers with intranetfor education and legal purposes

NEW SOUTH WALES

130 computers for legalpurposes600 in cell computers (Hopkins Correctional Centre)Estimated 250–300 computers for education

VICTORIA

TASMANIA

301 in-cell computers (Alexander Maconochie Centre)10 communal computers

A.C.T.

QUEENSLAND

WESTERN AUSTRALIA30 laptops for tertiary education program6 laptops for legal purposes402 communal computers

Page 11: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

2

Thereareonly36computerswhichcanbeusedincellsinWesternAustralia.ThirtyofthesehavebeenprovidedbytheUniversityofSouthernQueenslandtobeusedsolelyaspartofapiloteducationalprogram.

Theothersixarespeciallyconfiguredlaptopswhichcanbeissuedtopeopleincustodyforlegalpurposes.Forsecurityreasonsnoneofthesecomputersareabletoaccesstheinternet.

Accesstoin-cellcomputersfellsignificantlyinWesternAustraliain2009whentheprivilegeofowningandaccessinganin-cellcomputerwasremoved.Atthetimetherewere167computersownedbypeopleincustody,withspecificconfigurationrequirementswhichincludedpreventingthecomputerfromaccessingtheinternet.Thereasonsforthewholesaleremovalofcomputers,citedbytheDepartmentatthetime,includedsecuritybreachesandthecostofauditingandmanagingthecomputers(DCS,2009).

DespitecitingsecurityrisksasoneofthereasonsforremovingaccesstothesecomputerstheDepartmentdidnotdocumenttherisksassociatedwithhavingin-cellaccesstocomputers.Nordidtheyconsideroptionsformanagingtherisksbeyondtheblanketremovalofthecomputers.

Intheyearleadinguptothewholesaleremoval,only12computerswereconfiscatedduetosecuritybreaches.Thiswasasmallnumbercomparedtothenumberofcomputersinuse.

FabreandZymarishaveidentifiedthefollowingrisksinallowingpeopleincustodyaccesstodigitaltechnology,andhowtheseriskscouldbemanaged(Fabre&Zymaris,2016).

Table1Accesstodigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustody:riskmanagement

SecurityRisks RiskManagementImprovisedweaponsandself-harm Computersshouldbeconfiguredtoensure

minimumcablelengthsandhavelightweightornonremovableperipherals

Concealmentofcontrabandincomputerhardware

Physicalchecks,all-in-one,ortransparentcomputerchassis,tamper-evidentseals

Digitalcontraband(e.g.violentorpornographicimagesortypednotes)

Softwareandstoragerestrictions,modificationstohardwaresuchassealingUSBports

Unidentifiedprinteddocuments Allprinteddocumentsneedtoprovideuserdetailsincludingnameanddate/timeofprinting

Clandestinecommunication(e.g.unauthorisedcommunicationswithprotectedpersons,victims,witnesses,media,orcriminalassociates)

Restrictedstoragerequirements(noshareddocumentstorageareas)andemailrestrictionsincludingkeywordorkeyphrasefiltering

Page 12: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

3

Accessing,sharing,orstoringunauthorisedmaterial

Designingandmaintainingsecuresystemswhichrestrictandcontrolaccess,sharing,andstorageofinformation

Breachesofaccesstoprivate,confidential,orprivilegedmaterial

Physicalandelectronicsurveillanceandmonitoring,includingrandomandtargetedauditingofassetsandsystems,andloggingofallsystemactivity

Roguemedia/devices(e.g.anystoragedevicewhichisportableandoutsidestaffcontrolincludingCD’s,DVD’s,USB’s)

Securedata,programsandcompleteoperatingsystems(e.g.computersconfiguredtodenyuseofanyremovablestoragedeviceandtoactivelyalertstaffofsuchattempts)

Malicioussoftwareanddenialofserviceattacks

Computersystemmustpreventinstallationorrunningunapprovedsoftwareandsystemstoragequotasmustbeimplemented

Uncontrolledaccessanddatastorage Automatedandpredefinedsystemcurfews,networked,serverbasedstoragewhichcanbelockeddownandinspected

OtherjurisdictionsinAustraliaaremanagingtherisksassociatedwithaccesstocomputersbypeopleincustody.CorrectionalagenciesinNewSouthWales,Victoria,Queensland,andtheAustralianCapitalTerritoryhavecomprehensivepolicieswhichgovernaccesstocomputersbypeopleincustody.Thesepoliciesincludeinformationon:

• eligibilitycriteria• principlesofuse• approvalprocesses• systemconfigurations• penaltiesformisuse• supervision,monitoring,andauditingrequirements.

RecommendationIdentifyandmanagetherisksassociatedwithin-celltechnology,withtheintenttoexpandtheavailabilityofin-cellcomputeraccess.

Sixcomputerswereavailableforpeopleincustodytouseforlegalpurposes.Asof29May2017nonewereinuse.Thereasonforthelackofdemandisunknown,butitmaybeduetodifficultieswiththeapplicationprocess,oralackofawarenessoftheiravailability.

Inthesevenyearssincetheremovalofindividuallyownedin-cellcomputers:

• only15formalwrittenapplicationsforadepartmentallegallaptopweresubmittedbypeopleincustody

Page 13: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

4

• anadditionalthreepeoplesubmittedcorrespondencerequestingtheuseofalegallaptopbutfailedtocompleteorsubmittherequiredapplicationforms

• ofthe18peoplerequestingadepartmentallegallaptop,onlyninewereapprovedforissue

• ofthosenotapproved,securityconcernswerecitedinfourcasesandtheremainingapplicationsweredeniedduetonotmeetingthestricteligibilitycriteria.

TheselaptopshavebeenspeciallyconfiguredforuseincustodyandareownedbytheDepartment.Despitethelaptopsbeingdepartmentalproperty,thepolicyforaccessiscontainedinPolicyDirective42whichgovernsprisonerproperty(DCS,2013).

Technologyinpractice

TheAlexanderMaconochieCentreintheAustralianCapitalTerritoryhadcomputersinstalledinallcellsandaccommodationblocks.Residentscanbeapprovedtoaccessemail,Internet,andtheLegalEducationandResourceNetwork,whichisanonlineeducationalandlegalresource(ACTGovernment,2017).Otherjurisdictionsincluding:Queensland,Victoria,NewSouthWales,andTasmaniaalsohavein-celltechnologyorallowcomputersincells,althoughrestrictionsapplybasedonthelevelandtypeofneed.

Page 14: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

5

1.2 VariationbetweenfacilitiescausesinequityThereisnopolicyorguidancethatoutlineshowmanycomputersareneededateachfacility.However,policydoesstipulatethatthereshouldbeatleastonecomputeravailableforlegalpreparationwithineachfacility’slibrary(DCS,2014).

Thereisconsiderablevariationinaccesstocomputersbetweenfacilities.BroomeRegionalPrisonhasnocomputersavailableforaprisonpopulationofapproximately60people.Presumablythisisduetothefactthatitalsohasnolibraryandnoeducation.However,thisjustcompoundsdisadvantage.

TheDepartmentdoesnotappeartohavegivenconsiderationtotheincreasedneedtoaccesscomputerswhenonremand.Peopleremandedincustodyareexpectedtoparticipateintheirowndefencebyviewingevidenceandothermaterials.Theymayalsoneedtopreparewrittensubmissionstothecourtorundertakebasiclegalresearch.

ThelargestmaleremandpopulationsareatHakeaPrisonandCasuarinaPrison.ThelargestfemaleremandpopulationisatMelaleucaRemandandReintegrationFacility.ThesethreefacilitieshadthepoorestaccesstocomputersapartfromBroome,whichalsohasahighproportionofremandprisoners.

Thebestaccesstocomputerswasinsomeoftheminimum-securitypre-releaseandreintegrationfacilities.PardelupPrisonFarm,BoroniaPre-ReleaseCentreforWomen,WandooReintegrationFacility,andKarnetPrisonFarmallhadratiosoflessthan10peopleforeachcomputer.AccessatWoorolooPrisonFarmwasnotasgood.

AppendixBprovidesasummaryofaccesstodigitaltechnologyineachfacility.

RecommendationEstablishamodeltodeterminetheappropriateratioofcomputerstoprisonpopulation,whichaccountsfortheneedsoftheprisoncohort,andincreasethenumberofcomputerswhereneeded.

AccesstocomputersforyoungpeopleincustodyatBanksiaHillDetentionCentrewassignificantlybetterthantheadultestate.Therewereapproximatelytwoyoungpeopleforeverycomputerwithinthefacility3.However,therewereissueswiththequalityofthisequipment(seesection2.2).

3Additionalcomputershavebeenaddedinthelatterhalfof2017.

Page 15: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

6

Table2Ratioofpeopleincustodypercomputer(rankedlowesttohighest)

Facility2016/2017Dailyaveragepopulation*

Remandpopulation**

%remand

Totalcomputers

Ratioofpeopleincustodypercomputer

PardelupPrisonFarm 81 0 NA 16 5BoroniaPre-ReleaseCentreforWomen

90 0 NA 16 6

WandooReintegrationFacility

75 0 NA 12 6

RoebourneRegionalPrison

174 73 41.9% 26 7

KarnetPrisonFarm 347 0 NA 38 9EasternGoldfieldsRegionalPrison

165 48 29.1% 19 9

WestKimberleyRegionalPrison

208 45 21.6% 20 10

BunburyRegionalPrison

334 54 16.2% 29 12

BandyupWomen'sPrison

319 127 39.8% 22 15

WoorolooPrisonFarm

380 0 NA 26 15

GreenoughRegionalPrison

321 86 26.8% 20 16

AlbanyRegionalPrison

443 105 23.7% 22 20

AcaciaPrison 1462 0 NA 60 24CasuarinaPrison 947 404 42.6% 36 26HakeaPrison 1012 861 85.1% 35 29MelaleucaRemandandReintegrationFacility

162 96 59.2% 5 32

BroomeRegionalPrison

58 25 43.1% 0 NA

+Department-issuedlaptops 36

TotalAdult 6489 1877 28.9% 438 15BanksiaHillDetentionCentre

142 72 50.7% 57 2

TotalJuvenile 142 72 50.7% 57 2*Source:DCSBusinessIntelligenceandReporting,**Referstoallunsentencedprisoners(mainlycomprisedofremand,however,mayincludeotherstatustypessuchasappeal,extradition,deportation,arrest,intransit,oratlarge)

Page 16: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

7

ThedemandforaccesstocomputersbypeopleincustodyisnotknownormeasuredbytheDepartment.

AcaciaPrison(aprivatelyrunprison)isabletoassesslevelofdemandforaccesstolegalcomputerstosomeextentbecauseitsprisonersmustmakebookingstousethelegallibrarycomputers.Inthe12monthsfromAugust2016toJuly2017,therewasanaverageof180bookingspermonthtousethelegalcomputers.Acaciaisamedium-securityfacilitywhichholdsnearly1,500sentencedmales.Astherearenopeopleremandedatthefacility,thedemandforaccesstolegalcomputerspresumablystemsfromoutstandingcourtorappealmatters,paroleplans,orfamily/civillegalmatters.Demandinremandprisonswouldbehigher.

Page 17: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

8

2 EducationisdrivingdigitaltechnologyaccessincustodyDigitaltechnologyhasthepotentialtoengagemorepeopleinlearning,aswellasexpandtherangeofsubjectsandlevelsofeducationavailable.Youngpeople,inparticular,aremorelikelytoengagewithlearningifitisonlineandinteractive.Itcanalsobeusedtoprovidebettersupportforpeoplewithlearningdisabilities,lowliteracylevels,andEnglishasasecondlanguage(Champion&Edgar,2013).

Adultcustodialfacilitiesusecomputers,e-readers,andinteractivewhiteboardsforeducationpurposes.Most(76%)ofthecomputersavailabletopeopleincustodyareeducationcomputers.

Thereare67e-readersinthepublicmetropolitanprisonsandAlbanyRegionalPrison.Thesewereintroducedtoincreasetheabilityforself-pacedlearning.E-readersareloadedwithacademicreadingmaterialallowinghigherlevelstudentstolearnattheirownpaceandfromwithintheircell.Thesee-readershavehadmixedsuccessastheyareonlytargetedatasmallpartoftheprisonpopulationforaspecificpurpose.Withoutane-readerstudentswouldbeprovidedwithprintedcopiesofmaterial.

Interactivewhiteboardsenableclassestolivestreamtheinternetwhichcanenhanceandexpandprogramdelivery.Onlinecontentsuchasforums,TEDtalks,andtrainingcanbeextendedintotheclassroom.

WestKimberley,EasternGoldfields,Roebourne,andCasuarinahaveaccesstostorycreationsoftwarewhichallowsAboriginalpeopleincustodytocreateanimatedvideosintheirownlanguage.Throughthis,alibraryofresourcesofstoriesandinformationiscreatedinlanguageforotherstoaccess.Informationonmentalhealth,alcoholanddruguse,moneymanagement,andpotentiallyprisonpolicycanbecreated.

Apilotprojectallowingasmallnumberofpeopleincustodytostudyusingin-celllaptopsisalsobeingruninconjunctionwiththeUniversityofSouthernQueensland.Studentsusemodifiedlaptopssuppliedbytheuniversitywhicharepreloadedwithstudymaterialtocompletecourses.Asstatedearlier,30laptopswereavailableforthispurpose.

2.1 AccesstodigitaltechnologyiscoordinatedinadulteducationTheEVTUcoordinatesaccesstodigitaltechnologyacrossadultpublicfacilitiesforeducationalpurposes.TheUnitprovidestechnicalexpertise,guidance,andgovernanceforusingdigitaltechnology.

Educationcampusmanagersareresponsibleformanagingresourcesineducationcentreswithineachpubliclyrunadultfacility.Upgrades,maintenance,

Page 18: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

9

andtechnicalsupportareprovidedcentrallybytheEVTUthroughanInformationSystemsOfficer.

InformationTechnologyGuidelinesgoverntheusageofalleducationcentrecomputers.Theguidelinesinclude:

• maintenancearrangements• agreementsforpeopleincustodytoadheretoinordertoaccess

computers• whatthecomputerscanbeusedfor(i.e.study,educationalgamesunder

supervision,preparationofaparoleplaninexceptionalcircumstances)• howdataistobestored• softwareaccessandlicensing(DCS&ASETS,2017).

EVTUhasalsodevelopedspecificguidelinesfortheuseofthecomputerssuppliedbytheUniversityofSouthernQueenslandande-readers.

EVTUmanagestheriskofaccessingdigitaltechnology,includingaddingaphotographofthepersonincustodyontoe-readerstoallowstafftoeasilyidentifytheauthoriseduserofthedevice.Alle-readersandtheuniversitylaptopshavetrackingsheets,serialnumbers,andlogs.Thelaptopsarealsoloadedwithsoftwarewhichdetectsmisuseofthedevice.

2.2 Youngpeopleincustodyhaveinadequateaccesstodigitaltechnology

EducationatBanksiaHillDetentionCentreisnotpartofEVTU.Itthereforedoesnothavethesupportandguidanceavailabletoadultprisons.

InApril2017wevisitedBanksiaHillandobservedthattheeducationcentrecomputershadnotbeenmaintained.Manyofthecomputerswereoutdatedandneglected.Somewerenotevenworkingorhadreducedfunctionality.

Aninternalauditin2016hadfoundthatnearlyhalfthecomputerswerenotworkingandsomecontaineddigitalcontrabandsuchasmovies,music,andillegalsoftware(DCS,2016).

In2015thebudgetforeducationinBanksiaHillwasmergedwiththebudgetofthemainfacility.PriortothisanEducationPrincipalwasresponsibleformanagingaseparatebudget.

TheDepartmentofJusticereceivesfundsfromtheDepartmentofEducationtoprovideeducationservicestoyoungpeopleincustody.DuetotheexpirationofaMemorandumofUnderstanding,fundsin2013and2014werenottransferredtoJusticeatthattime.TheDepartmentofEducationfundingfor2013,2014,and2015(totalling$225,000)waseventuallypaidin2015asalumpsum.

Page 19: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

10

Itwasacknowledgedatthetimethatdigitaltechnologyhadbeenneglectedandthebackdatedfundswereintendedtobeusedforupgrades.

InJanuary2017theDepartmentcreatedaplantorefreshthetechnologyavailabletoyoungpeopleatBanksiaHill.Itsaiditwould:

• establishastandaloneeducationnetworkforthefacility• providecentralisedadministrationandfilesharingservicesthrougha

dedicatedserver• refreshandrepurpose135corporatecomputerswhichwereduefor

replacementtouseacrosstheeducationnetwork• provide43laptopstobeallocatedtostudentsattheteacher’sdiscretion• providenewprintersandinteractivewhiteboards• provideadedicatedintranetservicetoallowlearningresourcestobe

accessedbyyoungpeople.

TheplanwasforBanksiaHillstafftobetrainedtoprovidebasicsupporttotheinfrastructure.TechnicalsupportwastobeprovidedbytheKnowledgeandInformationTechnologydirectorateinheadoffice.ThisteamisalsoresponsibleforimplementingtheprojecttoaddresstheissuesatBanksiaHill.Anyfurthersupportwouldbeprovidedthroughprivatecontractors.

However,despitetheyearsofneglect,anddespitehavingfundssince2015andaplansinceearly2017,ourinspectionoftheCentreinJuly2017foundminimalprogress.Whilenewcomputerequipmenthadarrived,ithadnotbeensetupornetworked.

RecommendationImplementtheplantoupdatedigitaltechnologyatBanksiaHill.

2.3 PrivatelyrunfacilitiesvaryinaccessEducationinprivatelyrunprisonsisnotprovidedby,orsupportedbytheEVTU,andtheydonotneedtoadheretothestandardguidanceprovidedtothepublicprisons.Accessdiffersdependingontheprivateprovider.

SercorunsAcaciaPrisonandWandooReintegrationFacility.BothfacilitiespurchaseandmaintaincomputerequipmentthroughtheSercoITHelpdesk.TheHelpdeskprovidestechnicalsupport.On-sitetechniciansareavailabletoassistwithissueswhichcannotberesolvedremotelybytheHelpdesk.ThecomputersavailabletopeopleincustodyatAcaciaandWandooarerelativelynewandingoodcondition.

Page 20: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

11

AcaciaPrisonhadacomprehensivelocalordergoverningtheaccessanduseofcomputersbypeopleincustody,including:

• eligibilityandcriteriatousethecomputerrooms• theapprovalprocesstoaccesscomputers• computerroomsecurity• monitoringofuse• softwareanddatastoragerequirements(Serco,2016a).

WandooReintegrationFacilitydoesnothaveapolicygoverningaccessanduseofcomputersbypeopleincustody.However,itdoeshaveaDirector’sRulewhichgovernsresidentaccesstointernet-basededucation(Serco,2016b).SodexocommencedoperationofMelaleucaRemandandReintegrationFacilityinDecember2016.Everyprisontakestimetobedin,andMelaleucahasbeennoexception.However,evenbythetimeofourreview,educationservicesatMelaleucaremainedextremelylimited.ThefacilitywasstillawaitingapprovaltobecomeaRegisteredTrainingOrganisationandwasnotofferingafullsuiteofeducationprograms.Melaleucadoesnothaveaneducationcentre.However,computerslocatedintheunitprogramroomswereavailableforeducationalpurposes.Computeraccess,maintenance,andupdatingofcomputersweretheresponsibilityoftheheadofbusinessmanagement.Priortotakingoverthefacility,Sodexohaddevelopedarangeofpoliciesandproceduresincludingthosegoverningaccesstocomputers.However,oncethecontractcommenced,itwasapparentmanyofthesepolicieswerenotappropriatefortheoperatingenvironmentandarethereforebeingreviewed.Thepolicygoverningaccesstocomputerswastobereviewedalongwiththeothers.

Page 21: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

12

3 Accesstodigitaltechnologyforlegalpurposesisinadequate

Peopleincustodyoftenfaceoutstandingcriminallawmattersorlegalissuesassociatedwithbeingincustody.Theseincludedefendingcharges,questionsofsentencing,accessingbail,victimcompensation,sentencecalculations,parole,andthethreatofdeportation.Theymaywellalsohaveothercivilandfamilylawissues,includinghousing,taxorbusiness-relatedmatters,accesstochildren,restrainingorders,andcompensationforanyinjuriesorabusetheysufferedbeforeincarceration.

Peopleincustodymustaccesselectroniclegalinformationandprepareforcourtappearancesusingcomputersinlibrariesorcommonareas,ortheverylimitednumberofin-celllaptops.Unlikeeducationcomputers,thereisnocentralisedpersonorrolewhoisresponsibleforthemaintaining,upgrading,andsupportinglibrarycomputers.

RecommendationIdentifyacentralisedperson/rolewithresponsibilityformaintaining,upgrading,andsupportinglibrarycomputers.

Section5ofPolicyDirective21aboutlibraryservicesstatesthat:

• atleastonecomputerisavailableineachprisonlibraryforthepurposeoflegalpreparationandthatthesecomputersshouldprovideaccesstocurrentAustralianlegislation(viaTimeBase)andappropriatewordprocessingsoftware

• TimeBaseistobeupdatedquarterly• up-to-dateinformationistobeprovidedtoprisonersfromtheLegalAid

Website(thisisnotintendedtobedirectaccessasthepolicyalsostipulatesthereistobenointernetaccessfromthesecomputers)(DCS,2014).

Accesstoelectroniclegalmaterialisvialibrarycomputers.Atbestitisrestrictedtolibraryopeninghours.Furtherrestrictionsoccurwhen,duetoovercrowding,differentcohortshaveaccessatrestricted,rosteredtimes,orwhenpartsoftheprisonarelockeddownasaresultofincidentsorshort-staffing.

Eachfacilityisresponsibleforprovidingtheresourcesforaccess.Therearesubstantialdifferencesbetweenfacilitiesintermsofnumbersofcomputers,operatingsystems,andtypesandageofhardwareandsoftware.

WiththeexceptionofAcaciaPrison(16computers)allotherfacilitieshavesixorfewerworkinglibrarycomputerswhichcanbeaccessedforlegalpurposes.

Page 22: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

13

Thelownumberofcomputers,thegrowingprisonpopulation,andrestrictionsonaccessingprisonlibrariesmeansthataccessingcomputersforlegalpurposescanbedifficultforpeopleincustody.Supplyhasnotkeptupwithdemand.

3.1 Legalprofessionalsfacerestrictionsinprovidingservicestoclients

Understandablylegalpractitionersarerestrictedfromtakinglaptops,externalmediadevices,andelectroniclegalmaterialintofacilitieswithoutpriorapproval.However,thereareinconsistenciesinobtainingapproval,orusingfacilitysupplieddevices.Thisleaveslawyersandparalegalsunabletoshowaccusedpeopleelectroniclegalmaterialinanumberoffacilities.

Peoplefacingcriminalchargesneedtoviewevidenceandothermaterialsiftheyaretobeabletoenteraninformedpleaorparticipateintheirowndefence.Disclosureinmajorcrimecasesisnowservedinelectronicformats,usuallybyUSBorCD-ROMs.Someofthiscanonlybeviewedinelectronicform,suchasvideorecordingsofincidentsandinterviews.

Thesmallnumberofcomputersavailableinlegallibraries,andlimitedin-cellaccesstocomputers,makesitdifficultforpeopleincustodytoaccesselectronicmaterialsinpreparationfortheirdefence.Legalpractitionersmustthereforeshowaccusedpersonsevidenceagainstthemintheofficialvisitsareasofprisons.

PolicyDirective26dealswithsearchproceduresforfacilityvisitors,includinglegalprofessionalsvisitingtheirclients.Itoutlineswhatvisitorscantakeintocustodialsettings.Legalvisitorsarepermittedtotakelaptopcomputersintoprisonsprovidingallexternalperipheraldevicesandremovablemediaareremoved(DCS,2015).

However,thepolicyalsostatesthatlaptopsbroughtintoaprisonmaynotbeusedtodisplayvideoorotherphotographicmedia,exceptwiththeapprovaloftheprisonsuperintendent.InturnthesuperintendentmustgetadvicefromtheDirectorSecurityandResponseServicesoftheDepartment.

Legalprofessionalstoldusthattheprocesstogainthisapprovalwasinconsistent,bothbetweenfacilities,andbetweenstaffatthesamefacility.Theysaidthatiftheywerestoppedfrombringinginalaptopordigitalmedia,theofficersatthegatewereoftenunabletoprovideanyfurtherinformationabouthowtoseekapproval.

Thetwomainprivatelyoperatedprisons,AcaciaPrison,andMelaleucaRemandandReintegrationFacility,hadlocalformsregardingauthorisationtoallowrestricteditemssuchaslaptopsintotheprison.However,therewasnostandardformorprocessavailabletolegalpractitionerstogainapprovalinotherfacilities.

Page 23: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

14

Analternativeisforfacilitiestoprovidedeviceswhichcanbeusedtodisplaymaterialforclients.However,somefacilitiesdonotprovideworkingdevices,orthedevicesdonothavethecapacitytoacceptexternalmaterial.

Theresultisthatlawyersmaybeunabletoshowtheirclientselectronicmaterial.Clientsarethereforeunabletoviewtheevidenceagainstthemuntiltheyhavebeentakentocourt,justbeforetheircourtappearance.Theymaynothaveenoughtimetomakeasounddecisionaboutwhatpleatoenter.Thiscancausedelaystocourtproceedingsandunnecessarilyextendtimeincustody.

TheDepartmenthasbeenmadewellawareoftheconcernsoflegalpractitionersincorrespondence.AmendmentsweremadetothepolicyinJanuary2016butwewereinformedthatlawyerscontinuetoexperienceissuesintakinglaptopsandelectroniclegalmaterialintosomefacilities.

Despitethemattersbeingraisedinfurthercorrespondencebythelegalprofession,theDepartmenthasnotsatisfactorilyresolvedtheissues.

RecommendationDevelopaMemorandumofUnderstandingwithkeylegalbodiestoensureelectroniclegalmaterialcanbeviewedbypeopleincustody.

Page 24: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

15

4 TheDepartmentismissingopportunitiesTheDepartmenthasembracedtheuseofdigitaltechnologyinsomeareaswithgreatsuccess.However,ithasmissedopportunitiestousethistechnologyinotherareas.

Onereasonforthisisthatthereisnocentralapproachtoidentifythedigitaltechnologyneedsofpeopleincustodyacrosstheentireestate,orhowtheseneedscouldbemet.Individualprisonfacilitiesarelefttosettheirownprioritiesanddeterminehowtoachievethem.

Thisresultsinadisjointedapproachacrosstheprisonestate.Therehavebeensometrialstogainanunderstandingofhowthetechnologycanbeusedandwhatwillberequiredforamorethoroughrollout.However,theystalledbeforestatewideimprovementscouldberealised.

4.1 Videocommunicationiswidelyusedforcourtappearancesbutnotenoughforvisits

Videocommunicationtechnologyallowspeopletoseeandheareachotherinrealtimefromdifferentlocations,andreducestheneedfortravel.TheDepartmentusesavarietyofvideocommunicationtechnologies,includingdedicatedlandlinesforvideolinksandinternet-basedtechnologies,likeSkype.

TheDepartmentusesthistechnologyfor:

• courtappearances• officialvisits,includingappointedprisonvisitorsandvisitingjustices,

lawyers,policeofficersandrepresentativesofgovernmentagencies(e.g.socialservices,immigration,andchildprotection)

• socialvisitsparticularlyinsituationswherethepersonincustodyisalongwayfromtheirfamilyandsocialnetwork

• inter-prisonvisitsbetweenfamilymemberswhoareincarceratedindifferentfacilities

• specialisthealthconsultations.

Courtappearances

Courtappearancesviavideolinksiswellestablishedandextensivelyused.Itresultsinsignificantfinancialsavingsintermsofcourtcustodyandtransportcosts(OICS,2012).Mostvideocommunicationfromcustodyisforthispurpose.

Page 25: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

16

Officialvisits

Videocommunicationisalsosometimesusedbylawyerstoconsultwiththeirclients.Thissavestraveltimeforthelegalprofessionals.Insomecasesitprovidesadditionalprivacywherethealternativeisholdingaconsultationinacommunalvisitsarea.

However,theuseofthistechnologyislimited.Legalprofessionalsidentifiedseveralreasonsforthis:

• incompatiblevideocommunicationsystems(e.g.videolinkequipmentatWoorolooandAcaciaisnotcompatiblewiththevideolinksystemusedbyLegalAid)

• poorqualityconnectionswhenusinginternet-basedtechnologysuchasSkype

• competingpriorities(courtproceedingstakeprecedenceoverlegalvisitsviaVideolink).

Thereisalsosomeuseofvideocommunicationforotherofficialvisits,suchaslinkinginwithgovernmentagencies.However,theDepartmentdoesnothavereliableinformationastohowoftenthetechnologyisusedforthispurpose.

Socialvisits

Socialvisitsusingvideocommunicationwouldofferanimportantopportunityforpeopleincustodytocontactfamiliesandothersocialsupports,particularlywherepeopleareheldalongwayfromtheirsupport.Suchsituationsoccurwhenpeoplehavefamilyinremotelocations,interstate,oroverseas.

Videocommunicationwouldalsobeavaluabletoolwherefamilyandfriendsareunabletoattendaprisonduetoinjury,illnessorage.

Unliketheuseofvideocommunicationforcourts,thereisnosystemwidecoordinationoftheuseofthistechnologyforsocialvisits.Eachfacilityoperatesindependently,setstheirownpriorityforitsuse,anddeterminesitsownmethodforprovidingthetechnologytotheirfacility.

HakeahasdedicatedcablingtoenableSkypewhichhasbeensuccessful.Otherfacilitieshaveattemptedtoobtaininternet-basedvideocommunicationthroughwirelesstechnologybuttheresultshavebeenmixed.Pardelupusesthisapproachandiscurrentlyrunninganaverageof55socialvisitsviaawirelessnetworkeachweek,butitdoesexperienceintermittentconnectiondifficulties.

Otherfacilitieshavefoundtheservicetobeveryunreliable,particularlyinareaswherethe3Gand4Gmobilebroadbandinternethaspoorcoverage.

Page 26: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

17

TheDepartmenthasattemptedtoprovideacentralisedapproachtoprovidingthistechnologytoallprisons.TheKnowledgeandInformationTechnologyDirectoratecompletedapilotprojectatBunburyRegionalPrisonin2016.ItranSkypebyusingexistingnetworkcablestosupportanindependentinternetconnection.Thepilotresultedinsubstantialcosts,butinconsistentresultsandanunstableservice.

Thepoorresults,aswellasissuescreatedthroughthemergewiththeformerDepartmentoftheAttorneyGeneral,meanthatthepilotwillnotberolledoutfurtherinitscurrentform.

Ourreportsoverthelast15yearshavemaderepeatedrecommendationstoincreasetheuseofvideocommunicationforsocialpurposes.Eachtimetherecommendationhasbeensupportedatleastinprincipal,butprogresshasbeenslowandinconsistent(seeAppendixC).

Inter-prisonvisits

TheDepartmentusesvideocommunicationtechnologyforinter-prisonvisits.Thisallowsapersonincustodytoreceivevideovisitsfromsomeonewhoisconfinedinanotherprison.ThisisparticularlyimportantfortheyoungpeopleatBanksiaHillDetentionCentre.

Dataontheuseofvideocommunicationforinter-prisonvisitswasnotrecordedaccuratelyorconsistently.However,thedatathatwasavailableindicatedtherewere88successfulinter-prisonvideovisitsinthe2016-17financialyear.TwentyofthesewerefromBanksiaHill.

Whileface-to-facecontactbetweenfamilymembersispreferable,videocommunicationtechnologyofferssignificantcostsavingsandsecuritybenefits.Increaseduseofthistechnologycouldallowformorefrequentinter-prisoncontact.

RecommendationImplementawholeofdepartmentsolutiontoincreasevideocommunicationforofficial,social,andinter-prisonvisits.

4.2 Privatelyoperatedfacilitiesmakegooduseofself-servicekiosksSelf-servicekioskshavebeenimplementedintheprivately-runprisonsofAcacia,Wandoo,andMelaleuca.Thekiosksareplacedincommunallocations.Thekiosksenablepeopleto:

Page 27: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

18

• accesstheiraccounts• makemenuselections• viewvisitbookings• ordercanteenitems• makeinquiries• bookappointments.

TheuseofthesekiosksimprovesdigitalliteracyforpeopleincustodyastheymimiccommunityfacilitiessuchasATMs,andself-servicedevicesingovernmentdepartmentssuchastheDepartmentofHumanServicesortheDepartmentofTransport.Theyalsoenablepeopleincustodytotakepersonalresponsibilityfortheirday-to-dayactivities,particularlyimportantforthosereturningtothecommunityafteraperiodofprolongedimprisonment.

Kiosksalsocreateefficienciesforprisonsbystreamliningthemanagementofpeopleincustodythroughelectronicappointments,canteenordering,andinquiries.Thiscanfreeuptimepresentlyspentbyofficersprocessingrequestsanddealingwithpaper-basedforms.

TheDepartmenthasrecentlyintroducedInformationKioskstoassistwithtransitionalservicesinthepublicprisons.Thesekiosksprovidepreloadedofflinecontentdesignedtoassistpeoplewithplanningforrelease.Topicsincluded:

• obtainingaccommodation• obtainingdocumentation,suchasbirthcertificatesanddriverslicences• addressingfines• accessingcommunitydrugandalcoholservices.

Whilethesekiosksprovideadditionalaccesstoinformation,theyarenotassophisticatedasthekiosksintheprivatefacilities.Theydonotallowtwo-wayinteractionssuchasbookings,inquiriesorelectronicmessaging.

Page 28: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

19

Technologyinpractice

CorrectionalagencieswithintheUnitedStatesusetouchscreenkiosktechnologytoprovideextensiveofflinelegaldatabasesandresources.Thisalloweduserstonavigatecomprehensivelegalcontentwhichwasupdatedregularly(LexisNexis).CorrectionalauthoritiesintheUnitedStatesclaimlegalcontentprovidedthroughthesekiosksischeaperthanpurchasinglawbooksandotherlegalmaterials.Thekioskswerepaidforbymoneyspentbypeopleincustodythroughtheircanteens(Hannah,2004).

4.3 WAhasnotattemptedsecureinternetandintranetaccessforpeopleincustody

PeopleincustodyinWesternAustraliahavenodirectinternetaccess.Insomecases,educationorlibrarystaffwillaccesstheinternetonbehalfofaprisonertoassistwitheducationalorlegalrequirements.

Offlineeducationalcontentisoftenloadedontocomputersforpeopleincustodytoaccess.However,accessisonanindividualbasisandtheprocessisinefficient.

Asingleuploadpointwouldensurelegal,educational,andtransitionalmaterialsareuploadedfrequentlyandefficiently.Peopleincustodywouldbenefitfromhavingmoretimely,up-to-dateandconsistentinformation.Thiswouldalsoimprovedepartmentalefficiencybyonlyhavingtouploadinformationonce.

TherewouldalsobesecuritybenefitsfortheDepartment.Informationusecouldbemonitoredelectronically,andstaffmembersdownloadinginformationwouldnolongerhavetomakeanassessmentaboutitsappropriateness.

Therecently-openedEasternRegionalGoldfieldsPrison(EGRP)wasdesignedandbuiltforthe21stCentury,allowingforin-celltechnologyandasecurecellularnetwork.High-speeddatacableswereinstalledwithineachcell,futureproofingtheprisonfortheprovisionofin-celltechnology.

TheDepartmenthasnotproceededwiththeinstallationofin-cellterminalsordevicesatEGRP,despitetheinfrastructurealreadybeinginplace.Ithasthereforemissedtheopportunitytotestin-celltechnologyandtomakeaninformedcost/benefitassessment.

Internetandintranetaccesscanimprovecommunicationforpeopleincustodybyprovidingemail,securemessaging,orvideocommunicationinternalorexternaltotheprison.Thiscanimprovetheabilitytocommunicatewithprisonstaff,legalprofessionals,serviceproviders,externalagencies,andapprovedsocialcontacts.

Page 29: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

20

Theuseofsecureemailtocommunicatewithpeopleincustodymayalsoofferanefficientalternativetotraditionalmail,particularlyforurgentlegalmatters.Thepotentialrisksofprovidingthistypeofaccesscanbemitigatedthroughauditingcapabilities,remotemonitoring,securedatastorage,andkeywordandkeyphrasefiltering.

Technologyinpractice

TheAustralianCapitalTerritorypermitsdirectinternetaccessforpeopleincustody.Accessisrestrictedtospecificwhitelistedwebsites,includingeducationsites,toenabledetaineestocompletetertiarystudiesviacorrespondence(ACTGovernment,2017).

CorrectiveServicesNewSouthWaleshasasecureoffendercomputernetworkconnectingcorrectionalcentresacrossthestatetoacentralserver.TheOffenderAccessComputerNetworkhasupto2,000recycledcomputersavailableforpeopleincustodytouse(CSNSW,2017).Thisnetworkprovidesaccesstoeducationprograms,onlineassessments,andarangeofsoftwarepackagesandprogramstosupportparticipationineducationanddistancelearning,aswellasotherdepartmentalresources.ALegalInformationPortalisalsoavailableontheNetwork.ThisprovidesplainEnglishlegalresources,anumberofchaptersfromtheLawHandbook,factsheets,andastandaloneversionoftheLegalAidNewSouthWaleswebsite(Becker,2011).

SeveralprisonsinVictoriaprovideprisonerintranetportalsavailablethroughaspeciallydesignedserveranddesktopsystemknownas‘PrisonPC’.ThesesystemshavebeendeliveredthroughPublicPrivatePartnershipstofacilitiesincludingMarngoneetCorrectionalCentre,HopkinsCorrectionalCentre,andtheMetropolitanRemandCentreinVictoria.Theyprovidedirectaccesstolibrary,educational,andlegalservices,aswellasrecreationalcontent.(CyberITSolutionsPrisonPC)

Page 30: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

21

DepartmentofJusticeresponsetorecommendations

Page 31: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

22

Page 32: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

23

Recommendation3:DuringourinspectionofBanksiaHillin19-26Julywefoundnewcomputershadbeenpurchasedbutwerenotsetup.AvisittothefacilityinDecembershowedthatthesecomputerswerenowoperational.

Page 33: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

24

Page 34: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

25

Accesstodigitaltechnologyforpeopleincustodybyfacility(informationprovidedbythefacilities)

Facility

SummaryofAccess

AcaciaPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:1462CommunalcomputersLibrary:16Education:37Other:7

VideocommunicationLegal:30perweekSocial:70perweek

Approximately30self-serviceKiosksareavailableacrossthefacility.Theseallowpeopleincustodytoaccesstheiraccounts,ordercanteenitems,bookappointments,andmakeinquiries.AlbanyRegionalPrison 2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:443 CommunalcomputersLibrary:1Education:20Other:1

VideocommunicationLegal:5perweekSocial:8perweek

Educationcentrehad22e-readers,atabletforgraphicdesignandaninteractivewhiteboard.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.BandyupWomen’sPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:319CommunalcomputersLibrary:3Education:18Other:1

VideocommunicationLegal:35perweekSocial:10perweek

TenuniversitysuppliedlaptopsavailableforstudentsparticipatingintheUniversityofSouthernQueenslandMakingtheConnectionproject.Educationcentrehad13e-readers,aninteractivewhiteboard,aCDburner,andacamera.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.

Page 35: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

26

BanksiaHillDetentionCentre2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:142CommunalcomputersLibrary:1Education:56

VideocommunicationLegal:35perweekSocial:10perweek

BoroniaPre-ReleaseCentreforWomen2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:90CommunalcomputersLibrary:6Education:5Other:5

VideocommunicationLegal:approximately2permonthSocial:minimal

Educationcentrehadfivee-readers,aninteractivewhiteboard,andonelaptopavailableforstudents.AspartofthePrisonerEmploymentProgram,someresidentshadsupervisedaccesstocomputers,theinternet,andmobilephonesforjobsearchandworkpreparationpurposes.Boroniaalsohadlimiteduseofthe‘email-a-prisoner’service.BroomeRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:58CommunalcomputersLibrary:0Education:0

VideocommunicationLegal:10-15perweekSocial:minimal(asrequested)

BunburyRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:334CommunalcomputersLibrary:5Education:23Other:1

VideocommunicationLegal:20-25perweekSocial:7perweek

Educationcentrehadtwodigitalcameras,aninteractivewhiteboard,andonelaptopavailable.ParticipantsseekingemploymentthroughthePrisonerEmploymentProgramhadsupervisedandlimitedaccesstointernetandemailtoassistwithseekingjobs.Educationparticipantshadsupervisedaccesstouniversitycampuscomputersfortheirstudies.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.

Page 36: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

27

CasuarinaPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:947CommunalcomputersLibrary:3Education:27Other:6

VideocommunicationLegal:10perweekSocial:1perweek

TenuniversitysuppliedlaptopsavailableforstudentsparticipatingintheMakingtheConnectionproject.Educationcentrehad10e-readers,aninteractivewhiteboard,aCDburner,andtheaudiovisualplatformiTalkwhichenablesstudentstoproduceanimatedfilmsinEnglishorindigenouslanguages.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.EasternGoldfieldsRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:165CommunalcomputersLibrary:2Education:15Other:2

VideocommunicationLegal:NilSocial:1permonth

Educationcentrehadfivelaptops,sixinteractivewhiteboards,CDburner,digitalcamera,andiTalkaudiovisualplatform.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.GreenoughRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:321CommunalcomputersLibrary:0Education:18Other:2(legal)

VideocommunicationLegal:33perweekSocial:2perweek

Educationcentrehadoneuniversitysuppliedlaptop,aninteractivewhiteboard,andaCDburner.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.HakeaPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:1012CommunalcomputersLibrary:5Education:30

VideocommunicationLegal:45perweekSocial:9perweek

Educationcentrehadfoure-readers,alaptop,aninteractivewhiteboard,aCDburner,twosoundrecorders,fourmicrophones,andthreeprojectors.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.

Page 37: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

28

KarnetPrisonFarm2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:347CommunalcomputersLibrary:5Education:24Other:9

VideocommunicationLegal:0visitsperweekSocial:2-3permonth

Educationcentrehadeighte-readers,aninteractivewhiteboard,recordingdevices,andonelaptopavailable.PrisonerEmploymentProgramparticipantswereabletousecomputersandaccesstheinternetandemailforjob-seekingactivities.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.MelaleucaRemandandReintegrationFacility2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:162CommunalcomputersLibrary:0Education:5

VideocommunicationLegal12perweek:Social:0

Fiveself-servicekioskswereavailableacrossthefacility.Theseallowpeopleincustodytoaccesstheiraccounts,ordercanteenitems,bookappointments,andmakeinquiries.PardelupPrisonFarm2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:81CommunalcomputersLibrary:2Education:7Other:7

VideocommunicationLegal:2permonthSocial:55perweek

Educationcentrehadalaptop,aninteractivewhiteboard,andaCDburner.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.RoebourneRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:174CommunalcomputersLibrary:1Education:24Other:1

VideocommunicationLegal:35-40perweekSocial:0

Educationcentrehadthreeinteractivewhiteboards,alaptop,aCDburner,andtheaudiovisualplatformiTalkwhichenablesstudentstoproduceanimatedfilmsinEnglishorindigenouslanguages.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.

Page 38: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

29

WandooReintegrationFacility2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:75CommunalcomputersLibrary:2Education:10

VideocommunicationLegal:1perweekSocial:4perweek

Self-servicekiosksareavailableacrossthefacility.Theseallowpeopleincustodytoaccesstheiraccounts,ordercanteenitems,bookappointments,andmakeinquiries.Email-a-prisonerservicewasalsoavailableforresidentswithapproximatelyeightemailsreceivedperweek.WestKimberleyRegionalPrison2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:208CommunalcomputersLibrary:2Education:17Other:1

VideocommunicationLegal:30perweekSocial:2perweek

Educationcentrehadtwolaptops,aninteractivewhiteboard,threeCDburners,andtheaudiovisualplatformiTalkwhichenablesstudentstoproduceanimatedfilmsinEnglishorindigenouslanguages.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.WoorolooPrisonFarm2016-2017DailyAveragePopulation:380CommunalcomputersLibrary:2Education:24Other:3

VideocommunicationLegal:12perweekSocial:3perweek

Educationcentrehadfivee-readers,twolaptops,twocameras,twoCDburners,andtwoelectronicprojectors.AnInformationKioskforprisoneremploymentandtransitionalserviceswasalsoavailable.

Page 39: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

30

Previousinspectionrecommendationsaboutvideocommunication

Reporttitle ReportDate Reference

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofBandyupWomen’sPrison,Report13

June2002 Recommendation19(p.113)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofAcaciaPrison,Report19

March2003 Recommendation21(p.97)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofBroomeRegionalPrison,Report27

March2005 Recommendation12(p.109)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofBandyupWomen’sPrison,Report36

June2006 Recommendations8&9(pp.90&94)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofKarnetPrisonFarm,Report47

October2007 Recommendation14(p.45)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofAcaciaPrison,Report53

June2008 Recommendation12(p.75)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofWoorolooPrisonFarm,Report61

September2009

Recommendation6(p.42)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofHakeaPrison,Report63

April2010 Recommendation10(p.79)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofGreenoughRegionalPrison,Report66

June2010 Recommendation8(p.47)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofRangeviewRemandCentre,Report69

October2010 Recommendation16(p.67)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofBroomeRegionalPrison,Report77

March2012 Recommendation15(p.68)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofBoroniaPre-ReleaseCentreforWomen,Report79

July2012 Recommendation13(p.53)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofWoorolooPrisonFarm,Report80

August2012 Recommendation11(p.46)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofHakeaPrison,Report81

November2012

Recommendation20(p.107)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofAcaciaPrison,Report90

June2014 Recommendation19(p.85)

FemalePrisonsinWesternAustraliaandtheGreenoughWomen’sPrecinct,Report91

July2014 Recommendation13(p.62)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofEasternGoldfieldsRegionalPrison,Report92

August2014 Recommendation11(p.63)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofWoorolooPrisonFarm,Report101

October2015 Recommendation5(p.45)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofHakeaPrison,Report102

April2016 Recommendation7(p.89)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofAcaciaPrison,Report104

June2016 Recommendation11(p.89)

ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofKarnetPrisonFarm,Report105

August2016 Recommendation3(p.59)

Page 40: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

31

MethodologySelf-completionquestionnairesweresenttoeachfacilityrequestingdetailsofthedigitaltechnologyavailableforpeopleincustody.Thisincludedthenumberofcomputersavailablewithinlibrariesandeducationcentres,in-cellaccess,anduseofvideoconferencing.

Weexaminedvariousdepartmentalpolicydocuments,aswellascomplaintsdataandprisonerapplicationsfordepartmentalcomputers.Incidentandsecurityreportsconcerningmisuseofcomputersbypeopleincustodywereexaminedtoidentifyrisksassociatedwithaccesstocomputers.

WeengagedwithvariousexternalstakeholdersincludingtheUniversityofSouthernQueenslandandlegalpractitionersfromLegalAidWesternAustraliaandTheLawSocietyofWesternAustralia.Wealsoliaisedwithcorrectionalagenciesinotherjurisdictions,includingCorrectiveServicesNewSouthWales,CorrectionsVictoria,andQueenslandCorrectiveServicestoconductacross-jurisdictionalanalysisofdigitaltechnologyaccessforpeopleincustody.

WeconductedsitevisitstoanumberoffacilitiesbetweenFebruaryandJuly2017.Duringthesevisitsweobservedthetypesoftechnologyavailableforpeopleincustodyandspoketopeopleabouttheirexperiencesinaccessingdigitaltechnologywhileincustody.Discussionswereheldwithlocalstaffworkinginprisonlibrariesandeducationcentres.

Finally,meetingswereheldwithstafffromtheDepartment,includingtheDirectoroftheEducationandVocationalTrainingUnit,theDirectorOperatingStandardsandProcedures,andtheAssistantDirectorTechnologySystems.

Page 41: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

32

BibliographyACTGovernment.(2017,May12).LetterfromACTGovernment.Canberra,

AustralianCapitalTerritory:ACTGovernmentJusticeandCommunitySafety.

Becker,A.(2011).CorrectiveServicesNewSouthWalesInmateComputerNetwork.AustralasianCorrectionsEducationAssociation(ACEA)Conference.SurfersParadise.

Champion,N.,&Edgar,K.(2013).ThroughtheGateway:HowComputersCanTransformRehabilitation.London:PrisonReformTrustandPrisonersEducationTrust.

CSNSW.(2017,May23).Emailcorrespondence.Sydney,NewSouthWales:CorrectiveServicesNSW.

CyberITSolutionsPrisonPC.(n.d.).www.prisonpc.com/projects.RetrievedJuly27,2017,fromwww.prisonpc.com:http://www.prisonpc.com/projects.html

DCS&ASETS.(2017,January).InformationTechnologyGuidelinesv1.1.Perth,WesternAustralia:DepartmentofCorrectiveServicesandAuswestSpecialistEducationandTrainingServices(ASETS).

DCS.(2009,May19).LetterfromformerCommissionerIanJohnsontoInspectorofCustodialServices,ProfessorNeilMorgan.Perth:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2013,December6).PolicyDirective42-PrisonerPropertyProcedures.Perth,WesternAustralia:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2014,January14).PolicyDirective21ProvisionofLibraryServices-Procedures.Perth,WesternAustralia:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2015,February19).PolicyDirective26Searches-Procedures.Perth,WesternAustralia:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2016,July20).BHDCPCAuditReport.Perth,WesternAustralia:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2017a).BanksiaHillDetentionCentreEducationBusinessRequirements.Perth:DepartmentofCorrectiveServices.

DCS.(2017b).BanksiaHillDetentionCentreEducationSolutionDesign.Perth:DepartmentofCorrecticeServices.

Fabre,R.,&Zymaris,C.(2016).DesigningSecurePrisonerComputerSystems.Lulu.com,2016.

Page 42: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

33

Hannah,J.(2004,March22).jacksonville.com.RetrievedJuly28,2017,fromwww.jacksonville.com:http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/032204/bus_15133497.shtml#.WXq_OZWQ-Uk

LexisNexis.(n.d.).www.lexisnexis.com/Corrections/.RetrievedJuly28,2017,fromwww.lexisnexis.com:https://www.lexisnexis.com/Corrections/

Murphy,A.(2012).Digitalinnovationsinprisoneducation:Areviewofcurrentinitiatives.9thSymposiumofPostgraduateandEarlyCareerResearch(PGECR2012).Toowoomba.

OICS.(2012).ReportofanAnnouncedInspectionofHakeaPrison(ReportNo.81).Perth:OfficeoftheInspectorofCustodialServices.

Serco.(2016a,July19).AcaciaPrisonLocalOrder5.12.Perth,WesternAustralia:Serco.

Serco.(2016b,May2).DirectorsRuleSercoWandooReintegrationFacility.Perth,WesternAustralia:Serco.

Page 43: The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for

The Digital Divide: Access to digital technology for people in custody

Februar y 2018www.oics.wa.gov.au

Level 5, Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street Perth, Western Australia 6000Telephone: +61 8 6551 4200 Facsimile: +61 8 6551 4216

7639 OIC A3 Review cover artwork.indd 1 12/02/2018 12:48 PM