the dreaded “2-port parameters”

22
Imperial College London – EEE 1 L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics The dreaded “2-port parameters” Aims: To generalise the Thevenin an Norton Theorems to devices with 3 terminals Develop efficient computational tools to handle feedback connections of non ideal devices

Upload: truonghanh

Post on 01-Feb-2017

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 1L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Aims: – To generalise the Thevenin an Norton Theorems to devices with

3 terminals– Develop efficient computational tools to handle feedback

connections of non ideal devices

Page 2: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 2L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Generalised Thevenin + Norton Theorems

• Amplifiers, filters etc have input and output “ports” (pairs of terminals)• By convention:

– Port numbering is left to right: left is port 1, right port 2– Output port is to the right of input port. e.g. output is port 2.– Current is considered positive flowing into the positive terminal of port– The two negative terminals are usually considered connected together

• There is both a voltage and a current at each port– We are free to represent each port as a Thevenin or Norton

• Since the output depends on the input (and vice-versa!) any Thevenin or Norton sources we use must be dependent sources.

• General form of amplifier or filter:

Thevenin or Norton

Thevenin or Norton

Amplifier

+ +- -V1 V2

I1 I2Port 1(Input)

Port 2(Output)

Page 3: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 3L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

How to construct a 2-port model

• Decide the representation (Thevenin or Norton) for each of:– Input port– Output port

• Remember the I-V relations for Thevenin and Norton Circuits:– A Thevenin circuit has I as the independent variable and V as

the dependent variable: V=VT + I RT– A Norton circuit has V as the independent variable and I as the

dependent variable: I = IN + V GN• The source of one port is controlled by the independent variable of

the other port.• Write the I-V relations. • In what follows we examine the 4 obvious choices of building a 2-

port model.

Page 4: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 4L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

To represent a voltage amplifier we require that a voltage driving port 1 results into a voltage developed on port 2. This dictates the choice:• Voltage input for port 1, Norton representation for port 1.• Voltage output for port 2, Thevenin representation for port 2.An equivalent circuit for a voltage amplifier is:

• We have indicated the Thevenin source of port 2 as a voltage controlled voltage source v22=g21v1. This represents the main function of the voltage amplifier.• The Norton source of port 1 is also a controlled source, a CCCS, namely i11=g12i2. The amplifier may have a non-zero reverse current gain.• If the reverse current gain g12 is zero, the amplifier is called Unilateral• The voltage input terminal has a finite admittance g11.• The voltage output terminal has a finite impedance g22.

Modelling the voltage amplifierG parameters or “reverse hybrid parameters”

i11 = g12i2

i1

v1 g11 v2

i2

v22=g21v1

g22TheveninNorton

Page 5: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 5L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Modelling the voltage amplifier (2)

1

2

1 1

2 2

11 11 11 12

22 22 21 22

11 12

21 22

1 1 2

2 1 2

1 1

2 2

v v ii v i

v vi

g i g gv g g g

i

i

g g

v

i iv g g v

= + = + ⎫⇒⎬= + = + ⎭

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= ⇒ =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦G

Terminology:g11: Input admittanceg12: Reverse current gaing21: Voltage gaing22: Output impedance

A few final observations, without proof:

• The forward signal path exhibits more than unity power gain. • If connected in the reverse sense (input to port 2 and output from port 1) the amplifier will exhibit less than unity power gain.

i11 =g12i2

i1

v1 g11 v2

i2

v22=g21v1

g22TheveninNorton

We can write the I-V equations for each of the 2 terminals:

Page 6: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 6L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Modelling a current amplifier H parameters or the “hybrid parameters”

11 11 11 11 1 2

2 1 2

1

1

2

1

2

2

22

1

2

22 21 22

11 1

21 2

2

22

i i vv

h v h hi i vh h h

h hh

vi

vv vh

ii

i

= + = + ⎫⇒⎬= + = + ⎭

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦H=

Terminologyh11: Input impedanceh12: Reverse voltage gainh21: Current gainh22: Output admittance

• A current amplifier exhibits a reverse voltage gain (h12)!• The port-reversed amplifier is a voltage “amplifier”• The reverse signal path exhibits less than unity power gain.• If the reverse voltage gain h12 is zero, the amplifier is called Unilateral

i22=h21i1

i2

v2h22v1

i1

v11=h12v2

h11

NortonThevenin

A current amplifier has current input at port 1 and current and output at port 2.The representation choice is the inverse of that of a voltage amplifier:

Page 7: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 7L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

The FET: a transconductance amplifier Y parameters or the “short circuit parameters”

11 11 11 11 1 2

2 1 2

1

1

2

1

2

2

22

1

2

22 21 22

11 1

21 2

2

22

v v vv

y i y yi v vy y y

y yy

ii

iv vy

vi

v

= + = + ⎫⇒⎬= + = + ⎭

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦Y=

Formal descriptiony11: Input admittancey12: Reverse admittance gainy21: trans-admittance (gain)y22: Output admittance

• A transconductance amplifier exhibits a reverse transconductance gain!• The port-reversed amplifier is also a transconductance “amplifier”• The reverse signal path exhibits less than unity power gain.• If the reverse gain y12 is zero, the amplifier is called Unilateral

i2

v2y22

i22=y21v1i11 =y12v2

i1

v1 y11Norton Norton

This is a generalisation of an admittance. Both input variables are voltages.

Page 8: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 8L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

The transresistance amplifier Z parameters or the “open circuit parameters”

11 11 11 11 1 2

2 1 2

1

1

2

1

2

2

22

1

2

22 21 22

11 1

21 2

2

22

i i ii

z v z zv i iz z z

z zz

vv

vi iz

iv

i

= + = + ⎫⇒⎬= + = + ⎭

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦Z=

Formal descriptionz11: Input impedancez12: Reverse impedance gainz21: transimpedance gainz22: Output impedance• A transresistance (also called a transimpedance) amplifier exhibits a reverse transimpedance gain!• The port-reversed amplifier is also a transresistance “amplifier”• The reverse signal path exhibits less than unity power gain.• If the reverse gain z12 is zero, the amplifier is called Unilateral

v2

i2

v22=z21i1

z22v1

i1

v11=z12i2

z11 TheveninThevenin

This is a generalisation of an impedance. Both input variables are currents.

Page 9: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 9L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Determining values of 2-port parameters

1 11 1 12 2

2 21 1 22 2

i g v g iv g v g i= += +

We can determine 2-port parameters from the definitions.For example, the G parameter description states that:

Since these are small signal voltages and currents, these relations imply that the g parameters are partial derivatives:

2 1

2 1

1 111 12

1 20 0

2 221 22

1 20 0

i v

i v

i ig gv i

v vg gv i

= =

= =

∂ ∂= =∂ ∂

∂ ∂= =∂ ∂

The voltage boundary condition v1=0 means that v1 is kept constant, by connecting to a constant voltage source. Similarly, the current boundary condition i2=0, requires that the variation of the current flowing into a terminal is zero, i.e. the current originates from a constant current source.

Page 10: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 10L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

To connect a 2-port to other circuits we need to know its input and output impedance. Although it would appear these are the 11 and 22 entries of the appropriate parameter matrix this is not necessarily the case.

Since the choice of parameter representation is arbitrary, lets consider 2 different representations for a circuit, the Z and Y parameters. It is easy to confirm thatmatrix Z must be the inverse of matrix Y.

This means that

What is wrong here? Z11 is determined by a fictitious experiment in which port 2 is driven by a current source (i2=0) while Y11 is the result of a fictitious experiment in which port 2 is driven by a voltage source (v2=0)

Clearly the input impedance depends on the load connected to the output.

Similarly, the output impedance depends on what is connected to the input.

Observe that the terminal impedance does not depend on what is connected to the other port if the network is unilateral, i.e. if Y12=0 Z11=1/Y11.

Input and output impedance of an amplifier

( )2 2

1

11 22 111 11

1 11 22 12 21 11 10 0

1

i v

v Y iZ Yi Y Y Y Y Y v

= =

⎛ ⎞∂ ∂⎜ ⎟= = = ≠ =⎜ ⎟∂ − ∂⎝ ⎠

Page 11: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 11L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

We showed that the input impedance of an amplifier depends on whether the output is connected to a zero or infinite thevenin impedance. This allows us to prove by “reductio ad absurdum”:

the input impedance depends on the load impedance connected to the output

(if it did not, then the input impedance would be the same for the output open or shorted).

The exact value of the loaded input impedance can be found from the definition of the parameters, and ohm’s law on the load RL connected to the output:

The input impedance will only equal Z11 if • the amplifier is unilateral, or • the output is open circuited so that the load resistance is infinite.

Input and output impedance of an amplifier (2)

1 11 1 12 2

2 21 1 22 2 21 12 21 1 22 2 2

2 2 22

1 12 2111

1 22

LL L

inL

v Z i Z iv Z i Z i Z ii R Z i Z i i

v i R R Z

v Z ZZ Zi R Z

= + ⎫⎪⇒= + ⎫ − ⎬⇒ − = + ⇒ =⎬ ⎪= − +⎭ ⎭

= = −+

Page 12: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 12L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Conversion between amplifier representations• Some are obvious matrix inversions

from the matrix equations:

Recall that the inverse of a 2x2 matrix A is:

• To go from pure (Z or Y) to/from hybrid (G or H) parameters, e.g. to express y in terms of h:– write the definitions in terms of the known parameters (h in the example).– separate the independent/ dependent variables in the unknown (y in the example)

representation. One equation will be trivial to obtain! Substitute this into the other eq.

The equations for the two currents in terms of the voltages are the y-parameter equations.

111 12 22 12

21 22 21 11

11 22 21 12

1 , a

a

a a a aa a a a

a a a a

=

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−Δ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Δ = −

-1

1

1

Z = YG H

A

1 11 1 12 2

2 21 1 22 2

122 21

121 1 2 11 1 12 2

11 11

21 11 22 21 122 1 2 21 1 22 2

111 2 22 2

11 11 11

1

1

v h hi v v y v y vh h

h h h h hi v v y v y vh

i h v

i h i h v

hi h v v h vh h h

⎫= + ⇒ ⎪⇒⎬⎪= + ⎭

⎛ ⎞⇒ = − + ⇒⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠

= − = +

−= + = +

Page 13: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 13L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Common features of 2-port representations• x are the chosen inputs and y the chosen outputs. Then we can write

• a is the input impedance or admittance (depending on its units)• d is the output impedance or admittance (depending on its units)• c is the forward gain• b is the reverse gain. All 2-port networks may exhibit non-zero reverse gain!• If b=0 we call the 2-port network unilateral• If the network is meant to be an amplifier then its forward power gain is greater than

unity, and its reverse power gain is less than unity.• If a load is connected to port 2 the resistance seen into port 1 depends on the

magnitude of the load, unless the network is unilateral.• The output impedance of a network depends on the impedance driving its input

unless the network is unilateral.

1 1 2 1 1

2 1 2 2 2

y ax bx y xa by cx dx y xc d= + ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤

⇒ =⎬ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥= + ⎣ ⎦⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Page 14: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 14L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Amplifier representation choice

• It does not matter which representation is used, use most convenient!• Sensible choice depends on what is connected to the amplifier

• If Zsource<<Zin use voltage input representation:– Norton input half circuit: voltage (G) or transconductance (Y)

• If Zsource>>Zin use current input – Thevenin input half circuit: current (H) or transimpedance (Z)

• If Zload>>Zout use voltage output representation:– Thevenin output half circuit: voltage (G) or transimpedance (Z)

• If Zload<<Zout use current output representation:– Norton input half circuit: current (H) or transconductance (Y)

Page 15: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 15L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Amplifiers: modelling summary

ZYHG

Parameters

TheveninNorton

TheveninNorton

Input

ImpedanceImpedanceTheveninTransimpedanceAdmittanceAdmittanceNortonTransconductanceVoltageCurrentNortonCurrentCurrentVoltageTheveninVoltage

Reverse gain

Forward gainOutputName /

Representation

VIIV

Output

CCVSVCCSCCCSVCVS

Idealform

LowLow00ITransimpedanceHighHigh∞∞VTransconductanceHighLow∞0ICurrentLowHigh0∞VVoltage OutputInputOutputInput

RealIdealTerminal impedance

InputName / Representation

Notes: 1. Choice of representation is arbitrary2. Representation emphasises the intended function3. Can convert one representation into any other by Thevenin Norton transforms

Page 16: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 16L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

formal analysis of common terminal changeexample: how to get the CB Y matrix from the CE Y matrix

• The CB terminal voltages and currents, and their correspondence to CE voltages and currents are:

1 1

2 2 1

1 1 2

2 2

b EB BE e

b CB CE BE e e

b E B C e e

b C e

v v v vv v v v v vi i i i i ii i i

= = − = −

= = − = −= = − − = − −

= =

the admittance equations in the CB and CE configurations must be equivalent:

( )

( )( )

1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

2 2 1 2

b e e ie e re e fe e oe e ib b rb b ib e rb e e

CBCE

ib rb ie fe rb re oe

ib ie fe re oerb re oe

b C e fe e oe e

i i i y v y v y v y v y v y v y v y v v

y y y y y y yy y y y yy y y

i i i y v y v y

= − − = − − − − = + = − + − ⇒

⎫+ = +⎧ = − +⎧⎪ ⎪ ⎪⇒ ⇒⎨ ⎬ ⎨ = + + += − + ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩⎩ ⎭= = = + = ( )

( )

1 2 1 2 1 2 1fb b ob b fb b ob b fb e ob e e

CE CB

ob oefb ob fe

fb fe oeob oe

v y v y v y v y v y v v

y yy y yy y yy y

+ = + = − + − ⇒

=⎧⎫+ = −⎧⎪ ⎪ ⎪⇒ ⇒⎨ ⎬ ⎨ = − +=⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩

Page 17: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 17L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Exact treatment of the Series-Shunt connection:Add H parameters

V2+

-

I2+

-V1

I1+

-+

-

+

-+

-

Amp A

FeedbackNet B

Port 1 Port 2

Port 1Series Connection

Port 2Shunt connection

The feedback network is functionally a voltage amplifier from Port2 to Port1Electrically both networks share the electrical variables I1 and V2.KVL on P1 and KCL on P2 give:

I1 , V2

Shared electrical variables:

( )

1 1 1 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 2 2 2

,

since and

A B A B

A B A BB

A B A B

A B A B

V V V I I IV V V I I I II I I V V V V

I I I V V V

= + = + ⇒

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + = + = + =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦= = = =

A A B A+BH H H H H

Function of feedback net:Measure output VCorrect (mix) input Vi.e. it improves a G-amp

Page 18: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 18L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Exact treatment of the Shunt-Shunt connection:Add Y parameters

The feedback network is functionally a transconductance amplifier from Port2 to Port1Electrically the networks share V1 and V2. Application of KCL on each port gives:

V1 , V2

Shared electrical variables:

( )

1 1 1 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 2 2 2

,

since and

A B A B

A B A B

A B A B

A B A B

I I I I I II I I V V V VI I I V V V V

V V V V V V

= + = + ⇒

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + = + = =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦= = = =

A B A B A+BY Y Y + Y Y

V2

I2

V1+

-

I1+

-+

-

+

-+

-

Amp A

FeedbackNet B

Port 1 Port 2

Port 1Shunt Connection

Port 2Shunt Connection

+

-

Function of feedback net:Measure output VCorrect (mix) input Ii.e. it improves a Z-amp

Page 19: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 19L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Exact treatment of the Series - Series connection:Add Z parameters

The feedback network is functionally a transimpedance amplifier from Port2 Port1Electrically the two networks share input and output currents. Apply KVL on both ports:

I1 , I2

Shared electrical variables:

( )

1 1 1 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 2 2 2

and

since I and

A B A B

A B A BB

A B A B

A B A B

V V V V V VV V V I I I IV V V I I I I

I I I I I

= + = + ⇒

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + = + = =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦= = = =

A A B A+BZ Z Z + Z Z

+

-V1

I1+

-+

-

+

-+

-

Amp A

FeedbackNet B

Port 1 Port 2

Port 1Series Connection

Port 2Series Connection

+

-V2

I2 Function of feedback net:Measure output ICorrect (mix) input Vi.e. it improves a Y-amp

Page 20: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 20L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Exact treatment of the Shunt - Series connection:Add G parameters

+

-V2

I2

V1+

-

I1+

-+

-

+

-+

-

Amp A

FeedbackNet B

Port 1 Port 2

Port 1Shunt Connection

Port 2Series Connection

The feedback network is functionally a current amplifier from Port2 to Port1Electrically the two networks share V1 and I2. KCL on P1 and KVL on P2 gives:

V1 , I2

Shared electrical variables:

( )

1 1 1 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 2 2 2

and

since and

A B A B

A B A B

A B A B

A B A B

I I I V V VI I I V V V VV V V I I I I

V V V I I I

= + = + ⇒

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + = + = + =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦= = = =

A B A B A+BG G G G G

Function of feedback net:Measure output ICorrect (mix) input Ii.e. it improves an H-amp

Page 21: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 21L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

2-port network feedback connection rules

Y1

Y2

Y1+Y2

Z1

Z2

Z1+Z2

Shunt – Shunt: add Y

Series – Series: add Z

G1+G2

G1

G2

Shunt – Series: add G

H1

H2

H1+H2

Series – Shunt: add H

These are not all the possible amplifier interconnections. We often need to cascade two amplifiers, i.e. drive the an amplifier with the output of another. We will encounter this connection when we study multi-stage amplifiers.

Page 22: The dreaded “2-port parameters”

Imperial College London – EEE 22L5 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics

2-port parameters: the “old” notationThe choice of common terminal introduces ambiguity in the 2-port parameter description of a

transistor. This is resolved in the “old” (IRE) notation as follows:• A 2 lowercase letter subscript is used instead of the numerical we have already seen.:• The first letter is

– “i” for the Input Impedance or Admittance (the “11” parameter)– “f” for the Forward Gain (the “21” parameter)– “o” for the Output Impedance or Admittance (the “22” parameter)– “r” for the Reverse Gain (the “12” parameter)

• The second letter specifies which of the device terminals is used as a common reference: Emitter (“e”), Base (“b”) or Collector (“c”).

• For field effect transistors the second letter is “s” (source), “g” (gate) or “d” (drain)• Example: In the common emitter connection the “h” parameters are written:

11

12

21

22

input impedance ( ) reverse voltage gain ( ) forward current gain ( ) also known as

output admittance ( )

ie

re

fe

oe

h hh hh h

h h

β

This notation in still used in data sheets!