the early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin...

28
Ringberg, 30 June 2011 The early growth of supermassive black holes

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The early growth of supermassive black holes

Page 2: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Deborah Sijacki Volker Springel

Resimulating the build-up of galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6 with higher resolution.

Page 3: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

z=7.9 z=6.2 z=3.9

Page 4: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Sijacki, Springel &Haehnelt 2009

By z=6 the 10^5 M seed black hole has grown into a supermassive black hole with mass several billion times that of the sun.

Page 5: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Early on the accretion rate is at the Eddington limit for more than 50% of the time.

Sijacki, Springel &Haehnelt 2009

Page 6: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The mass at z=6 depends strongly on the radiative efficiency of the accretion and therefore on the spin of the black hole.

Page 7: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Does the hierarchical assembly extend all the way to stellar mass black holes?

Volonteri et al.

or Does the hierarchical growth start with a minimum seed mass?

Kauffmann & Haehnelt

Page 8: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

We most probably need massive seed black holes. How do massive seed black holes form?

Page 9: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011 Regan&Haehnelt 2009

Page 10: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Page 11: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Mortlock et al. 2011

FORS2@VLT(< 1µ) plus GNIRS@Gemini North (>1µ)

The red curve is not a fit but a template from 169 SDSS QSO spectra at 2.3<z<2.6 with large CIV blue shifts.

Page 12: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

redshift: 7.085

MgII line width: 3800 ± 200 km/s

inferred bh mass: 2 x109 M

L/Ledd: 1.2 ± 0.6

age of Universe: 0.77 Gyr

ULAS J1120 SDSS J1148

6.42

3 x 109 M"

0.87 Gyr

2.33 ε0.1-1 e-foldings earlier!

Page 13: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Mortlock et al. 2011

The observed transmission

Page 14: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Mortlock et al. 2011

•  very short near-zone

•  first detection of a “red” damped absorption wing

RNZ

The transmission in the near-zone

Page 15: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Flux decrement in average Lyα forest vs proximity effect

Γ

Flux decrement:

need to know gas and temperature distribution (numerical simulations)

Proximity effect:

need to know luminosity and systematic redshift of the quasar, potential bias due to overdensity

L/r2

Page 16: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

all adapted to T0 = 104 K, γ = 1.3

Overall there is good agreement between recent measurements from flux decrements adapted to the same temperature density relation and measurements from the proximity effect.

Measuring the photoionization rate Γ

Page 17: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Smooth evolution. No sign of percolation.

Γquasar(Req) = Γbackground IGM appears to be still highly ionized at z~6.

Page 18: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The ionizing emissivity

Bolton et al. 2011

˙ N ion ∝ Γion

lmfp

corresponds to about 1-2 ionizing photons per hydrogen atom “photon-starved reionization”

Page 19: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Pushing to higher redshift

Bolton et al. 2011

Page 20: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

HII region or classical proximity effect?

R∝ ˙ N tQ f HI−1( )

1/ 3

Very hard to tell the difference!

Expanding into neutral IGM

R∝ ˙ N 1/ 2

Expanding into highlyionized IGM

Page 21: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

For low ages of the quasar (107 yr or less) the degeneracy between HII region and proximity zone is broken.

The effect of the age of the quasar on the transmission profile

107yr

Bolton et al. 2011

106yr

Page 22: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Bolton et al. 2011

Near-zone sizes

Page 23: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The small RNZ stands out.

Bolton et al. 2011

Near-zone sizes

Page 24: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The observed transmission profile appears consistent with a 10% neutral as well as a fully neutral surrounding IGM depending on quasar age.

The observed transmission profile

observed

106yr

observed

107yr

Bolton et al. 2011

Page 25: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

DLA T1216

If a DLA sits in front of the quasar, the transmission profile is also consistent with a highly ionized surrounding IGM .

But

observed

107yr

Bolton et al. 2011

Page 26: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

107yr 106yr

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

T1216 vs RNZ

The observed transmission profile depends strongly on quasar age.

Bolton et al. 2011

Page 27: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

106yr

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

The observed RNZ and T1216 suggest fHI≥0.1 and tq≤107yr. A highly ionized surrounding IGM plus DLA are not very likely (~5%).

T1216 vs RNZ

107yr

Page 28: The early growth of supermassive black holes€¦ · galaxies and black holes (including spin history and kicks due to gravitational wave re-coil) in the most massive halo at z=6

Ringberg, 30 June 2011

Summary

•  probably the first detection of a damping wing due to a significantly neutral IGM (proximate DLA unlikely)

  surprisingly low age inferred for the quasar -  ~107 yr if surrounding IGM fully neutral -  ~106 yr if fHI ~ 0.1

•  the age is shorter than the e-folding time for a moderately spinning black hole growing at the Eddington rate with 10% efficiency (4.5 ε0.1 107 yr) ; adds further to the puzzle how to form a 2x109 M black hole by the time the Universe is 0.77Gyr old