the effect of three autumn storms on a foredune · [3] van rijn, leo c. 2009 "prediction of...

1
The Effect of Three Autumn Storms on a Foredune Joshua K. DeVries, Nichole DeVries, Jonathan D. Gorter, Jacob Santucci, John T. Spykman Introduction Results Conclusions References Autumn storms pose a potential threat to the health of coastal Michigan foredunes. Research predicts more intense autumn storms in the future [1].The study focused on erosion and deposition in an area influenced by waves, precipitation, and wind caused by storms. Objectives 1. Analyze storm characteristics 2. Monitor effects of wave run-up on beach and foredune 3. Map erosion and deposition on the foredune Abstract Storms contribute to the shape of a beach-dune system, but few studies describe specific effects of storms on a foredune environment. Our team studied the changes that two autumn storms caused to a foredune. The data collected came from on-site anemometers, a wind vane, erosion pins, sand samples for grain size analysis, GPS data entry, photographs, observations, and storm data from the National Weather Service, National Oceanic, and Atmospheric Administration. Our field research took place in a three week period, beginning October 24 and ending November 6, 2013. We recorded three storms, each with high wind speeds and wave heights causing erosion and deposition on the foredune and beach area. Discussion Acknowledgments We would like to thank P.J. Hoffmaster State Park, the National Science Foundation, the Michigan Space Grant, Jake Swineford, and Deanna van Dijk. [1] Angel, James R., Scott A. Isard. 1998 “The Frequency and Intensity of Great Lakes Cyclones.” Journal of Climate 11: 61-71. [2] NOAA. 2013. “National Data Buoy Center.” Accessed November 13. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/ [3] van Rijn, Leo C. 2009 "Prediction of dune erosion due to storms." Coastal Engineering 56: 441-457. Erosion and deposition of the foredune were caused by wind and wave run-up, tracked by the changing wrack line (Fig. 6). The waves deposited sand at the base of the foredune causing a deposition area. The wind moved sand farther up on the windward face of the foredune. Our study results confirm other studies that show foredune activity increases with increasing wave sizes [3]. Our study documented three storms that contributed to erosion and deposition on a Lake Michigan beach and foredune. The study also showed that wave run-up and sand transport had significant effects on foredune topography. During our study, three autumn storms occurred (Fig. 3). Storm 1 (Oct. 26) had the greatest wave height and wind speed but no precipitation. Storm 2 (Nov. 1) had lower wave height and wind speeds along with precipitation. Storm 3 (Nov. 6) had the lowest wave height but high wind and precipitation (Table 1). Results show significant erosion and deposition activity on beach; variation decreases inland. Deposition occurred on rows 1-4 and erosion on rows 5-7 (Fig. 4). During storm 1, waves came up 20.02m while storm 3 came up 24m. Storm 2’s wrack line was not visible when we made our measurements. Week 2’s 3.06m wrack line shows the interstorm period after storm 1. Methods Figure 6: Wave run-up was indicated by a wrack line (line of debris). 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 24-Oct 25-Oct 26-Oct 27-Oct 28-Oct 29-Oct 30-Oct 31-Oct 1-Nov 2-Nov 3-Nov 4-Nov 5-Nov 6-Nov Wave Height Wind Speed (m/s) Date Wind vs. Wave Height Storm 1 Storm 2 Storm 3 Average Wave Height 2.8m 1.8m 1.5m Average Wind Speed 7.68m/s 6.18m/s 7.62m/s Figure 4a: Graph shows significant deposition (positive values) and erosion (positive values) for week one. Figure 3: Wind speed and wave height during the study period. Figure 5: Image shows wrack lines during storm and interstorm periods. Week 1: 6.2 m (teal); week 2: 3.06m (purple) and 20.02m (pink); week 3: 24m (orange). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -200 -100 0 100 200 A B C D E F G Height (mm) Change in Height Oct. 24-Oct.31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 A B C D E F G Height (mm) Change in Height Oct. 31-Nov. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 4b: Graph shows significant deposition (positive values) and erosion (positive values) for week two. Our study location was a beach-foredune system in P.J. Hoffmaster State Park (Fig. 1). Table 1: Average wave height and wind speed for the three recorded storms. Study Area Figure 1: Study location was at a beach and foredune area at P.J. Hoffmaster State Park. Data was collected from October 24, 2013 to November 7, 2013. Wave height was collected from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website [2]. Erosion pin height was measured to record surface change. The wrack line was tracked with a Juno Trimble GPS and analyzed with the ArcGIS program. Wind speed and direction was recorded at 2m using an anemometer. Figure 2: Juno Trimble GPS, erosion pins, and folding ruler. Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 2

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Effect of Three Autumn Storms on a Foredune · [3] van Rijn, Leo C. 2009 "Prediction of dune erosion due to storms." Coastal Engineering 56: 441-457. Erosion and deposition of

The Effect of Three Autumn Storms on a Foredune Joshua K. DeVries, Nichole DeVries, Jonathan D. Gorter, Jacob Santucci, John T. Spykman

Introduction

Results

Conclusions

References

Autumn storms pose a potential threat to the

health of coastal Michigan foredunes. Research

predicts more intense autumn storms in the

future [1].The study focused on erosion and

deposition in an area influenced by waves,

precipitation, and wind caused by storms.

Objectives

1. Analyze storm characteristics

2. Monitor effects of wave run-up on beach and

foredune

3. Map erosion and deposition on the foredune

Abstract

Storms contribute to the shape of a beach-dune system,

but few studies describe specific effects of storms on a

foredune environment. Our team studied the changes

that two autumn storms caused to a foredune. The data

collected came from on-site anemometers, a wind vane,

erosion pins, sand samples for grain size analysis, GPS

data entry, photographs, observations, and storm data

from the National Weather Service, National Oceanic,

and Atmospheric Administration. Our field research

took place in a three week period, beginning October

24 and ending November 6, 2013. We recorded three

storms, each with high wind speeds and wave heights

causing erosion and deposition on the foredune and

beach area.

Discussion

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank P.J. Hoffmaster State Park, the

National Science Foundation, the Michigan Space

Grant, Jake Swineford, and Deanna van Dijk.

[1] Angel, James R., Scott A. Isard. 1998 “The Frequency and Intensity of Great Lakes

Cyclones.” Journal of Climate 11: 61-71.

[2] NOAA. 2013. “National Data Buoy Center.” Accessed November 13.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/

[3] van Rijn, Leo C. 2009 "Prediction of dune erosion due to storms." Coastal

Engineering 56: 441-457.

Erosion and deposition of the foredune were

caused by wind and wave run-up, tracked by the

changing wrack line (Fig. 6). The waves

deposited sand at the base of the foredune

causing a deposition area. The wind moved sand

farther up on the windward face of the foredune.

Our study results confirm other studies that show

foredune activity increases with increasing wave

sizes [3].

Our study documented three storms that

contributed to erosion and deposition on a Lake

Michigan beach and foredune. The study also

showed that wave run-up and sand transport had

significant effects on foredune topography.

During our study, three autumn storms occurred (Fig. 3). Storm 1 (Oct. 26) had the greatest wave height

and wind speed but no precipitation. Storm 2 (Nov. 1) had lower wave height and wind speeds along with

precipitation. Storm 3 (Nov. 6) had the lowest wave height but high wind and precipitation (Table 1).

Results show significant erosion and deposition activity on beach; variation decreases inland. Deposition

occurred on rows 1-4 and erosion on rows 5-7 (Fig. 4).

During storm 1, waves came up 20.02m while storm 3 came up 24m. Storm 2’s wrack line was not visible

when we made our measurements. Week 2’s 3.06m wrack line shows the interstorm period after storm 1.

Methods

Figure 6: Wave run-up was indicated by a wrack line (line of debris).

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

24-Oct 25-Oct 26-Oct 27-Oct 28-Oct 29-Oct 30-Oct 31-Oct 1-Nov 2-Nov 3-Nov 4-Nov 5-Nov 6-Nov

Wav

e H

eigh

t

Win

d S

pee

d (

m/s

)

Date

Wind vs. Wave HeightStorm 1 Storm 2 Storm 3

Average Wave Height 2.8m 1.8m 1.5m

Average Wind Speed 7.68m/s 6.18m/s 7.62m/s

Figure 4a: Graph shows significant deposition (positive values) and erosion

(positive values) for week one.

Figure 3: Wind speed and wave height during the study period.

Figure 5: Image shows wrack lines during storm and interstorm periods.

Week 1: 6.2 m (teal); week 2: 3.06m (purple) and 20.02m (pink); week 3:

24m (orange).

12

34

56

7

-200

-100

0

100

200

ABCDEFG

He

igh

t (m

m)

Change in HeightOct. 24-Oct.31

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

12

34

56

7-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

ABCDEFG

He

igh

t (m

m)

Change in HeightOct. 31-Nov. 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Figure 4b: Graph shows significant deposition (positive values) and erosion

(positive values) for week two.

Our study location was a beach-foredune

system in P.J. Hoffmaster State Park (Fig. 1).

Table 1: Average wave height and wind speed for the three recorded storms.

Study Area

Figure 1: Study location was at a beach and foredune area at P.J.

Hoffmaster State Park.

Data was collected from October 24, 2013 to

November 7, 2013. Wave height was collected

from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration website [2]. Erosion pin height

was measured to record surface change. The wrack

line was tracked with a Juno Trimble GPS and

analyzed with the ArcGIS program. Wind speed

and direction was recorded at 2m using an

anemometer.Figure 2: Juno Trimble GPS, erosion pins, and folding ruler.

Week 1Week 2

Week 3

Week 2