the efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition
DESCRIPTION
The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition. Preyanan Larbanantaphol M.4/4 No.4 Ratima Vangsawang M.4/4 No.7. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE EFFICIENCY OF MEMORABILITY AND
DIFFERENT SENSATIONAL RECOGNITION
Preyanan Larbanantaphol M.4/4 No.4Ratima Vangsawang M.4/4 No.7
![Page 2: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTIONBefore we memorize, we must
receive information in brain. There are many methods to receive information such as; listening, watching, touching etc.
![Page 3: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTIONThe mind deals with various kinds of
information. We also use language to think. but human memory holds other kinds of information too. For example, it can store information as mental pictures. The images can also be experienced in other sensory forms. A special kind of dynamic imagery is experienced like movies inside the head. You may be able to replay experiences from your past like a mental video (E.Martinez, 2006).
![Page 4: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CEREBRUM
http://sitysat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!977D9156A7C78D2!500.entry
http://www.besthealth.com/besthealth/bodyguide/reftext/html/nerv_sys_fin.html
![Page 5: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
FRONTAL LOBE { ABOUT MEMORY }
http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/FrontalLobe.php
![Page 6: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TEMPORAL LOBE AND MIDBRAIN { ABOUT LISTENING }
http://benkimball.vox.com/library/post/qotd-time-travel.html
![Page 7: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
OCCIPITAL LOBE { ABOUT WATCHING }
http://www.strokesurvivors.ca/new/OccipitalLobe.php
![Page 8: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
INTRODUCTIONThe purposes are to study about the
relations between the method to receive information and the efficiency of memorability.
![Page 9: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MATERIAL AND METHOD First, sampling the volunteers by
random the students in Mahidol Wittayanusorn School, twenty men and twenty women in grade 10 and 11 participated in the study. Recording data, then analyze the data by using anova. Finally, draw a conclusion.
![Page 10: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MATERIAL AND METHOD For data collecting, test the volunteers
for 3 steps, the first step is letting these people remember a ten number ( two digit number ) given by watching within two seconds per number.
![Page 11: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MATERIAL AND METHOD Ten seconds later, asking them to write
the number as much as they can remember within one minute.
![Page 12: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MATERIAL AND METHOD The next step is doing as the first step
but change the method to given the numbers by leads participant listen.
![Page 13: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MATERIAL AND METHOD For last step, participants were
manipulated both watching and listening ( the numbers in each step is differently).
![Page 14: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
10 NUMBERS Ten numbers were chosen by random
number program. listening
watching both
9 53 4210 62 1556 63 9276 43 1193 82 6717 10 2681 85 6439 18 8970 71 2752 80 69
![Page 15: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
RESULTS
![Page 16: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F
P-value F crit
Sample 2.7 1 2.7
2.015717
0.158407
3.92433
Columns
45.51667 2
22.75833
16.9905
3.48E-07
3.075853
Interaction 3.05 2 1.525
1.138507
0.323911
3.075853
Within 152.7 1141.339474
Total203.9667 119
![Page 17: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F
P-value F crit
Sample
4.408333 1
4.408333
4.186172
0.043056
3.92433
Columns
36.35 2
18.175
17.25906
2.83E-07
3.075853
Interaction
4.516667 2
2.258333
2.144523
0.121826
3.075853
Within120.05 114
1.05307
Total165.325 119
![Page 18: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MEN AND WOMENANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F
P-value F crit
Sample
7.004167 1
7.004167
5.920618
0.015715
3.881505
Columns
80.85833 2
40.42917
34.17475
9.52E-14
3.034414
Interaction
6.808333 2
3.404167
2.87754
0.058267
3.034414
Within
276.825 234
1.183013
Total371.4958 239
![Page 19: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
GRADE 10 AND 11ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F
P-value F crit
Sample
2.204167 1
2.204167
1.794468
0.181682
3.881505
Columns
80.85833 2
40.42917
32.91441
2.54E-13
3.034414
Interaction
1.008333 2
0.504167
0.410455
0.663825
3.034414
Within
287.425 234
1.228312
Total371.4958 239
![Page 20: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no different
between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s pointsFrom F = = = 2.0157166
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points
![Page 21: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation receptionFrom F = = = 16.99049
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception
![Page 22: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
GRADE 10 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different wayFrom F = = = 1.1385
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way
![Page 23: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no difference
between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s pointsFrom F = = = 4.1862
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points
![Page 24: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation receptionFrom F = = = 17.2591
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception
![Page 25: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
GRADE 11 BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different wayFrom F = = = 2.8775
Fα = 3.92433If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way
![Page 26: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MEN AND WOMEN For Sex H0 : There is no different
between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s pointsFrom F = = = 5.9206
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points
![Page 27: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
MEN AND WOMEN For different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation receptionFrom F = = = 34.1747
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception
![Page 28: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
MEN AND WOMEN For Sex and different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different wayFrom F = = = 2.8775
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way
![Page 29: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
GRADE 10 AND 11 For Grade H0 : There is no different
between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s pointsFrom F = = = 1.7945
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points
![Page 30: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
GRADE 10 AND 11 For different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of point from different sensation receptionFrom F = = = 32.9144
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we reject H0 .We conclude that there is different between the variance of point from different sensation reception
![Page 31: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
GRADE 10 AND 11 For grade and different sensational reception H0 :
There is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different wayFrom F = = = 0.4105
Fα = 3.881505If F > Fα then reject H0
Consequently , we accept H0 .We conclude that there is no different between the variance of men ’ s points and women ’ s points that receive number in different way
![Page 32: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
RESULTS
F-value For sex
For different sensation
al reception
For sex and different sensational reception
Grade 10 2.01572
16.99049 1.1385
Grade 11 4.1862 17.2591 2.8775Men and women
5.9206 34.1747 2.8775For sex
For different sensation
al reception
For sex and different sensational reception
Grade 10 ND D NDGrade 11 D D NDMen and women
D D ND
Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10, grade 11 & men and women
Table shows F-value of points in grade 10,grade 11 & men and women
![Page 33: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
RESULTS
F-value For grade
For different sensational reception
For grade and different
sensational reception
Grade 10 & grade 11
1.7945 32.9144 0.4105
For grade
For different
sensational reception
For grade and different sensational
reception
Grade 10 & grade 11
ND D ND
Table shows F-value of points in grade 10&11
Table shows the different between the variance of points in grade 10&11
![Page 34: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The difference of sensational reception
affect the efficiency of memorability . The best way to receive information is watching, listening and both in order .
![Page 35: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION However, in most studies in which
verbal items have been rated, information about sex differences is scarce (e.g., Paivio et al., 1968; Rubin & Friendly, 1986).
![Page 36: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This mini project could not be successful
without assistance and suggestions from Aj.Usa Jeenjenkit, Aj.Sirimard Sukprasert, Aj.Washirasorn Saengsuwan and Aj.Pornmongkol Jimlim. Thanks for our volunteers that make our project finish successfully.
![Page 37: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
REFERENCES Vadim Kotelnikov (2009).The Way Our Mind
Works. Retrieved from www.1000ventures. com/business.../mind_how-it-works.html
Lisa, C. & Murray, T. M. (2010). Verbal and Spatial Short-term Memory. Retrieved from
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a741927340
Lisa, M. B., Jeanette, A. (2008). An investigation of sex differences in word ratings across
concrete, abstract, and emotion words. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi_hb3538/is_3_58/ai_n29459215/
![Page 38: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
REFERENCES Short-term memory (n.d.). In wikipedia.
Retrieved 23 August 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-term_memory
Walter, J. F. (1991).The Physiology of Perception Retrieved from http://sulcus.berkeley.edu /FLM/MS/Physio.Percept.html
![Page 39: The efficiency of memorability and different sensational recognition](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56816641550346895dd9b270/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
QUESTIONS ??