the envision rating system - ogra ethan griesbach_the... · envision™ verification process o...

25
THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM November 4, 2014 Guidance for Sustainable and Integrated Infrastructure Design Presented by: Ethan Griesbach Presented at: 2014 Bridge Expo: Bridge Innovation For Now. For the Future.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM ™

November 4, 2014

Guidance for Sustainable and Integrated Infrastructure Design

Presented by: Ethan Griesbach

Presented at: 2014 Bridge Expo: Bridge Innovation – For Now. For the Future.

Page 2: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

What is Envision™?

Who is Responsible?

Infrastructure: Why/When is Envision™ applied?

How is Envision™ applied?

Where has Envision™ been applied?

Q&A

Presentation Overview

Page 3: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Objectives

What is Envision™?

Page 4: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Envision™ : Provides Four Primary Objectives

1. Holistic framework for sustainable infrastructure planning:

o Assesses environmental, social and economic benefits/impacts of projects. o Compliments Ontario Environmental Assessment regulatory process.

2. System for evaluating, grading and providing recognition:

o Assesses the sustainability indicators over the course of a project’s lifecycle. o Allows proponent to grade project and see where they can do more/less.

3. Asks are we doing the project right, and is this the correct project:

o Pathway – align with overall community needs and enhance quality of life? o Performance – efficiency and effectiveness.

4. Encourage integrated infrastructure systems:

o Many credits impact multiple areas. o Go beyond traditional project boundaries to identify synergies.

Page 5: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Envision™: 5 Categories, 14 Subcategories and

60 Credits + Innovation

5

Purpose, Community, Wellbeing

Siting, Land & Water, Biodiversity

Materials, Energy, Water

Collaboration, Management, Planning

Emission, Resilience

Page 6: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Each Credit has Multiple Levels of Achievement

1. Improved: Performance that is above conventional. Slightly above regulatory requirements.

2. Enhanced: Sustainable performance that adheres to Envision™ principles.

3. Superior: Sustainable performance that is noteworthy.

4. Conserving: Performance that has achieved essentially zero impact.

5. Restorative: Performance that restores natural or social systems.

* Innovation Points: performance that advances sustainable infrastructure practices or show exceptional performance beyond expectations.

*Point scores are designed to provide incentives for proceeding to the next level of achievement.

Page 7: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Improved Enhanced Superior Conserving Restorative

Po

ints

QL1.1 IMPROVE COMMUNITY QUALITY OF LIFE

7

No Negative Impact

Envision™: Credit Evaluation Criteria

Page 8: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Envision™ Levels of Award Achieved Through Verification

8

o Award achieved through Independent third-party verification:

Recognition Level Minimum Applicable Points (%)

Bronze Award 20

Silver Award 30

Gold Award 40

Platinum Award 50

Page 9: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Developed and Managed in Joint Collaboration

ISI Founders (2010)

Page 10: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Infrastructure: Why/When is

Envision™ Applied?

Page 11: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Infrastructure Today Requires Enhancements 11

Page 12: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Problem with existing infrastructure systems:

o Having negative impact on our natural resources, social and economic systems. o Use of natural resources outpacing natural rate of return (Living Plant Report ‘14, WWF). o Depleted resources and systems with “traps and vulnerabilities” lessen quality of life.

Why we need infrastructure systems: o World Economic Forum - infrastructure determines productivity of a country. o Efficient (performance) systems enable economy/society to prosper/grow. o Infrastructure systems have enabled our current high quality of life… sustainable?

How can Envision™ assist? o Framework, that details ‘how to’ design sustainable infrastructure systems. o Evaluates and rates projects sustainable indicators to identify gaps and shortcomings. o Provides performance and pathway assessment of projects.

Why? Existing Infrastructure Must be Re-built and

Replaced with Sustainable Systems

Page 13: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

When? Project Design and EA Phase

Planning and design team reviews requirements of Envision™:

o Each of the 60 credits has a respective evaluation criteria. o Credits apply to design, planning, construction and maintenance phases.

Evaluation of project design and not actual performance:

o Some credits require maintenance, monitoring and contingency plans. o A Envision™ Rating system, for existing infrastructure is in development.

Compliments Ontario EA regulatory process:

o Provides methods to evaluate potential positive/negative effects of a proposal. o Guidance and resource, for methods of assessment that can be used. o Methods: cumulative effects, ecosystem approach, rehabilitation,

consultation, and life cycle assessment.

Page 14: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

How is Envision™ Applied?

How is Envision™ Applied? How is Envision™ Applied?

How Is Envision™ Applied?

Page 15: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Envision™ Three Tools/Steps of Assessment

1) Self-Assessment Checklist:

• Quick review of project sustainability • Informs project team as to what could be added or

removed to improve performance

2) Guidance Manual:

• Framework with guidance for levels of achievement for each of the 60 credits

3) Workbook – Scoring Tool:

• Project team enters response for each of the 60 credits • Retains response and tabulates score for project • Used by project verifiers and authenticator.

Page 16: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Envision™ Verification Process

o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria.

o Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure assigns an independent verifier.

o At least one credentialed Envision™ Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) must be part of the project team for projects registered for Verification.

Page 17: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Example: Leadership Category

17

Page 18: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Example: Resource Allocation Category

18

Page 19: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Example: Natural World Category

19

Page 20: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Example: Climate and Risk Category

20

Page 21: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Where has Envision™ been Applied?

Where has Envision™ been

Applied?

Page 22: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Case Study #1: South L.A. Wetland Park

22

2014 - Envision™ Platinum Award

Key Features:

o Brownfield redevelopment;

o Habitat restoration - creation of open water and march areas;

o Reduced pollutants in urban runoff by diverting flow through a 4.5 acre treatment wetland; and

o Restorative and multimodal infrastructure, that provides many ecosystem services.

Page 23: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Case Study #2: Placer County Snow

Creek Restoration

23

2014 – Envision™ Platinum Award

Key Features: o Brownfield redevelopment;

o Integrates several infrastructure

networks (trail and local stormwater systems); and

o Reduce sediments, phosphorus and nitrogen from stormwater to improve Lake Tahoe water quality.

Page 24: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

In Summary…

24

www.sustainableinfrastructure.org

[email protected]

1. Holistic framework for sustainable infrastructure planning

2. System for evaluating, grading and providing recognition

3. Asks are we doing the project right, and is this the correct project

4. Encourage integrated infrastructure systems

Page 25: THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM - ogra Ethan Griesbach_The... · Envision™ Verification Process o Independent review to confirm that a project meets the Envision™ evaluation criteria

Thank you Questions/Comments?

[email protected]

www.sustainableinfrastructure.org