the evolution of c o l o u r terms explaining typology
DESCRIPTION
The Evolution of C o l o u r Terms Explaining Typology. Mike Dowman Language, Evolution and Computation Research Unit, University of Edinburgh 3 September, 2005. Colour Term Typology. There are clear typological patterns in how languages name colour. neurophysiology of vision system - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Evolution of Colour TermsExplaining Typology
Mike Dowman
Language, Evolution and Computation Research Unit, University of Edinburgh
3 September, 2005
Colour Term Typology
There are clear typological patterns in how languages name colour.
neurophysiology of vision system or cultural explanation?
• Constraints on learnable languages• or an evolutionary process?
Basic Colour Terms
Most studies look at a subset of all colour terms:
• Terms must be psychologically salient
• Known by all speakers
• Meanings are not predictable from the meanings of their parts
• Don’t name a subset of colours named by another term
Number of Basic Terms
English has red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple, pink, brown, grey, black and white.
crimson, blonde, taupe are not basic.
All languages have 2 to 11 basic terms
• Except Russian and Hungarian
Prototypes
Colour terms have good and marginal examples prototype categories
• People disagree about the boundaries of colour word denotations
• But agree on the best examples – the prototypes
Berlin and Kay (1969) found that this was true both within and across languages.
World Colour Survey
110 minor languages (Kay, Berlin, Merrifield, 1991; Kay et al 1997; Kay and Maffi, 1999)
• All surveyed using Munsell arrays
Black, white, red, yellow, green and blue seem to be fundamental colours
• They are more predictable than derived terms (orange, purple, pink, brown and grey)
Evolutionary Trajectories
white + red + yellow + black-green-blue
white + red + yellow + green + black-blue
white-red-yellow + black-green-blue
white + red-yellow + black-green-blue
white + red + yellow + black + green-blue
white + red-yellow + black + green-blue
white + red + yellow + black + green + blue
white + red + yellow-green-blue + black
white + red + yellow-green + blue + black
Derived Terms
• Brown and purple terms often occur together with green-blue composites
• Orange and pink terms don’t usually occur unless green and blue are separate
• But sometimes orange occurs without purple
• Grey is unpredictable
• No attested turquoise or lime basic terms
Exceptions and Problems
• 83% of languages on main line of trajectory• 25 languages were in transition between stages• 6 languages didn’t fit trajectories at all
Kuku-Yalanji (Australia) has no consistent term for green
Waorani (Ecuador) has a yellow-white term that does not include red
Gunu (Cameroon) contains a black-green-blue composite and a separate blue term
Neurophysiology and Unique Hues
Red and green, yellow and blue are opposite colours
De Valois and Jacobs (1968): There are cells in the retina that respond
maximally to either one of the unique hues, black or white
Heider (1971): The unique hues are especially salient
psychologically
Tony Belpaeme (2002)
• Ten artificial people
• Colour categories represented with adaptive networks
• CIE-LAB colour space used (red-green, yellow-blue, light-dark)
• Agents try to distinguish target from context colours (the guessing game).
• Correction given in case of failure
Emergent Languages
• Coherent colour categories emerged that were shared by all the artificial people
• Colour space divided into a number of regions – each named by a different colour word
• But some variation between speakers
No explanation of Typology
Belpaeme and Bleys (2005)
Colour terms represented using points in the colour space
Colours chosen from natural scenes, or at random
Few highly saturated colours
Emergent colour categories tend to be clustered at certain points in the colour space
Similarity with WCS was greatest when both natural colours were used and communication was simulated
Colour Space in Bayesian Acquisitional Model
red - 7
orange
purple
blue - 30green - 26
yellow - 19
Possible Hypotheses
high probabilityhypothesis
medium probability hypothesis
low probabilityhypothesis
Equations
)(
)()|()|(
dP
hPhdPdhP Bayes’ RuleBayes’ Rule
h
c
R
RProbability of an accurate example at colour c within h if hypothesis h is correct
t
c
R
RProbability of an erroneous example at colour c
RRcc is probability of remember an example at colour is probability of remember an example at colour cc
RRhh is sum of is sum of RRcc for all for all cc in hypothesis in hypothesis hh
RRtt is sum of is sum of RRcc for whole of the colour spacefor whole of the colour space
Probability of the data
Problem – we don’t know which examples are accurateProblem – we don’t know which examples are accurate
pp is the probability for each example that it is accurate is the probability for each example that it is accuratee e is an example is an example E E is the set of all examplesis the set of all examples
t
c
R
RpheP
)1()|(
Probability for examples outside of Probability for examples outside of
hypothesis (must be inaccurate)hypothesis (must be inaccurate)
Probability for examples inside of Probability for examples inside of hypothesis (may be accurate or hypothesis (may be accurate or inaccurate)inaccurate) t
c
h
c
R
Rp
R
pRheP
)1()|(
Ee
hePhdP )|()|(
Hh
hdPhPdP )|()()(
Hypothesis Averaging
We really want to know the probability that each colour can be denoted by the colour term
So, sum probabilities for all hypotheses that include the colour in their denotation
Doing this for all colours produces fuzzy sets
Hhi
Hhii
ii
hdP
hdP
hdPhP
hdPhPdhP
)|(
)|(
)|()(
)|()()|(
Substituting into Bayes’ rule:
Urdu
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Hue (red at left to purple at right)
Nila
Hara
Banafshai
Lal
Pila
Unique Hues
The Speaker makes up a new word to label the colour.
Start
The hearer hears the word, and remembers the corresponding colour. This example will be used to determine the word to choose, when it
is the hearer’s turn to be the speaker.
Yes (P=0.001)
A speaker is chosen.
A hearer is chosen.
A colour is chosen.
Decide whether speaker will be
creative.
No (P=0.999)
The speaker says the word which they think is most likely to be a correct label for the colour based on all the
examples that they have observed so far.
Evolutionary Model
Evolutionary Simulations
• Average lifespan (number of colour examples remembered) set at:
18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110 or 120
• 25 simulation runs in each conditionLanguages spoken at end analysed• Only people over half average lifespan
included• Only terms for which at least 4 examples
had been remembered were considered
Analyzing the Results
Speakers didn’t have identical languages Criteria needed to classify language
spoken in each simulation• For each person, terms classified as red,
yellow, green, blue, purple, orange, lime, turquoise or a composite (e.g. blue-green)
• Terms must be known by most adults• Classification favoured by the most people
chosen
Typological Results
0
5
10
15
20
25
30P
erc
en
t o
f te
rms
of
this
ty
pe
Re
d
Ye
llow
Gre
en
Blu
e
R-Y
Y-G
G-B
B-R
R-Y
-G
Y-G
-B
G-B
-R
Type of colour term
WCS
Simulations
Percentage of Color Terms of each type in the Simulations and the World Color Survey
Derived Terms
• 80 purple terms
• 20 orange terms
• 0 turquoise terms
• 4 lime terms
Divergence from Trajectories
• 1 Blue-Red term• 1 Red-Yellow-Green term• 3 Green-Blue-Red terms
Most emergent systems fitted trajectories:• 340 languages fitted trajectories• 9 contained unattested color terms• 35 had no consistent name for a unique hue• 37 had an extra term
Adding Random Noise
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Pe
rce
nt
of
term
s o
f th
is t
yp
e
Red
Yel
low
Gre
en
Blu
e
R-Y
Y-G
G-B
B-R
R-Y
-G
Y-G
-B
G-B
-RType of colour term
WCS
No noise
50% noise
The model is very robust to noise
Derived terms with noise
• 60.6% purple
• 26.8% orange
• 0.3% turquoise
• 9.9% lime
Number of Colour Terms Emerging
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Number of colour acurate examples remembered during an average lifetime
Me
an
nu
mb
er
of
ba
sic
co
lou
r te
rms
in
em
erg
en
t la
ng
ua
ge
s
No noise
50% noise
Implications of number of words Emerging
Languages are complex because we talk a lot
Not because complex languages help us to communicate
• No communication ever takes place
• So no truly functional pressures
Conclusions
(1) Colour term typology a product of the uneven spacing of unique hues in the conceptual colour space.
Problem: we might be able to obtain similar results with a significantly different model.
(2) Colour term typology can be explained as a product of learning biases and cultural evolution.