the evolution of micro piles in america · early years for load carrying micro pre 1980 • in u.s....

45
THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA PETER J NICHOLSON Nicholson Consulting DAVID E PINYOT Pinyot Consulting

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA

PETER J NICHOLSONNicholson Consulting

DAVID E PINYOTPinyot Consulting

Page 2: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980

• In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary drilled

• Project size typically $50-100,000; Annual market $1-2 million

• Installation rates 50-100 feet(15-30M) p• Design loads in soils of 20 tons (180

kN)

Page 3: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Brookgreen Gardens SC

Page 4: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Brookgreen Garden SC From the Award program, Micro Piles in Swamp

Page 5: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Brookgreen Garden Micro Piles for compression and tension in Swamp

Note from this copy of the brochure howThe micro piles were utilized in the canopyPoles foundations

Page 6: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Pokomoke River tension compression sleeves ready for Micro Piles

Page 7: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Pokomoke River Bridge Collapsed timber piles replaced by Micro Piles

Page 8: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Pokomoke River Bascule Bridge Tension and compression Micro Piles

Page 9: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Orange County New York Prison Micro Piles 1980

Page 10: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Orange County New York Prison

Page 11: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Alcoa Bauxite Reduction PlantMobile Alabama 1982

Page 12: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

EVOLUTION OF RETICULATED

• Lizzi; Italy, Slope stability and light loads for rehabilitation of structures

• Reticulated (interlaced to force composite action) for slope stability

• Demonstration of group action more than sum of parts for both slopes and compressive loads

• Other practitioners in Europe begin slope work under Lizzi patents

• In U.S. Nicholson and Fondedile construct reticulated and non-reticulated structures

• Expiration of Lizzi patent Fondedile ceases U.S. work in 1980’s

• Soil nailing and VERT at Texas A&M demonstrate composite action

Page 13: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Mendocino County CaliforniaReticulated MicroPile Wall

Page 14: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Non-Reticulated MicropileStructure

Page 15: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

LR 69 Type A Wall Non Reticulated

Page 16: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

LR 69 PennsylvaniaMicro Piles for landslide control

Page 17: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

LR 69 Construction Concrete cap over micro piles on Shoulder of roadway

Page 18: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Vertical Earth Reinforcing Technique NGES Texas A&M 1998

Page 19: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Plan View VERT Wall

Page 20: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

VERT Global MovementDemonstrates Composite Action

Page 21: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Horizontal Composite Action

FROM FHWA MANUAL

Page 22: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

MODERN MICRO PILES

• Design loads of 250 tons (2300 kN) or more for piles in both soil and rock

• Test Loads of up to 600 tons (5340 kN)• Diameters up to 300 mm• Cased 80k yield steel and reinforced• Job sizes of to $50 million and more• Total market estimated at $100 million

annually

Page 23: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

The beginnings of larger capacities permanent casing Late 1970’s

Page 24: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Early 100 ton capacity Micro Piles in Karst Delaware River Crossing

Page 25: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

New York M T A transit car repair facility at Coney Island, New York

Page 26: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary
Page 27: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino Las Vegas Nevada

Page 28: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Mandalay Bay Las Vegas360 MicroPiles

360 Permanent Jacks

Page 29: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Mandalay Bay Construction

Each Pile Was equippedWith it’s ownHydraulic ramTo insure levelingOf the foundation slabs

Page 30: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Williamsburg Bridge New York City (NYCDOT)

Page 31: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Williamsburg Bridge Construction

Page 32: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

BQE Elevated Highway New YorkMicro Pile Retrofit

Page 33: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Vandenberg AFB inside and outside Micro Pile installation

Page 34: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Vandenberg AFB Micro Pile Test

Note number and Size of tie-down Bars for this 500 Ton test

Page 35: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

United Grain Silos Vancouver Washington Drilling 250 ton Micro Piles

Page 36: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Richmond San Rafael Bridge Ca2001 Test to 1070 kips

Page 37: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

I-110 California Seismic RetrofitDrilling and testing micro piles

Page 38: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Lewistown Narrows Project State College Pennsylvania

Page 39: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Lewiston, Pa Micro Piles used for global stability

Page 40: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Lewistown Micro Piles for Global Stability Drawing

Page 41: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Lewiston Micro Piles for Global Stability both temporary and permanent

Page 42: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

New River Bridge Florida Department of Transportation

Page 43: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

New River Bridge Fl Night work from barge in River note existing RR Bridge

Page 44: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

Florida New River Bridge Completed Crutch Bent Micro Piles inside caissons

Page 45: THE EVOLUTION OF MICRO PILES IN AMERICA · EARLY YEARS FOR LOAD CARRYING MICRO PRE 1980 • In U.S. Nicholson/Fondedile typically 100-180 mm Diameter 180 kN, unreinforced, rotary

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

• Nicholson Construction Co: Tom Richards• Hayward Baker: John Wolosick• DBM Contractors: Tom Armour• Northwest Cascade: Spark Johnston• Pinyot Consulting: David Pinyot• Philip Wycliffe-Jones• FHWA Federal Highway Administration