the evolution of the indo-europeans in the upper paleolithic, through the "eye" of soma

Upload: forest-francis

Post on 01-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    1/36

    The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic,

    through the Eye of Soma

    Francois Pontvianne

    under the supervision of

    F. Graezer Bideau

    C. Lutringer

    M. Laperrouza

    College of Humanities, EPFL

    Winter 2014

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    2/36

    Abstract

    The Rigveda, probably the oldest sacred text still in use today, praises in many of its hymns Soma

    as both an elixir, a plant and a god. There has been a lot of debate as to the botanical identity

    of Soma, but if we make the assumption that Amanita Muscaria was the original Soma plant of the

    Aryans, the composers of the Vedas, who brought it from their original home to India during their

    migrations southwards; then following the track of the mushroom leads us back into the time when

    the Vedas began to be composed: the Upper Paleolithic. The identity of Soma helps in understandingwhat may have happened to the ancestors of the Aryans, the Proto-Indo-Europeans, from whom present

    day Indo-Europeans inherit their languages and some of the founding myths of their cultures. The

    red, white-spotted mushroom, and other psychedelics such as Psilocybe Cubensis and Cannabis, may

    have catalysed the development of language and gnosis which permitted and shaped the development of

    agriculture, the first civilizations, and eventually our modern day culture. Nevertheless, modern culture

    has seemingly little to do with its wild origins, but in seeing our ancestors as the ecstatically-inspired

    people who composed the Vedas, rather than as the savages we often pretend prehistoric people to have

    been, we can reconnect with our roots and discover what they may still have to reveal us.

    i

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    3/36

    Acknowledgements

    I would like to thank all the writers who contributed with their lives to the subject at hand in this

    essay, for the enrichment in inspiration and imagination I have enjoyed since reading their writings.

    I would also like to thank the EPFL and the personnel of the College of Humanities for allowing the

    students to choose their topic of research and express themselves freely. I believe that following ones

    interest is the best way to learn, the MACS team allowed this to happen for me.

    ii

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    4/36

    Contents

    1 Introduction 1

    2 Scholastic History 2

    2.1 Indo-European Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.2 Sanskrit and Proto-Indo-European . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.3 The RigVeda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.4 What is Soma in the Rig Veda? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.5 The mystery of soma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    2.5.1 Amanita Muscaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.5.2 Ephedra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.5.3 Syrian Rue aka Peganum Harmala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.5.4 Psilocybe Cubensis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.5.5 Nelumbo nucifera . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102.5.6 Cannabis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    2.6 Soma as a function rather than a specific plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    3 Soma through Indo-European migrations and exchanges 12

    3.1 Lets go back in time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123.2 Art and The first hu-mans: the Eurasiatic people before the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) . 133.3 The first transport revolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    3.3.1 Domestication of the horse and dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153.3.2 Movements and Migrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163.3.3 The Ice Age until the end of the last glacial maximum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173.3.4 Arctic roots and routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183.3.5 Rock Art Traces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    3.4 Catastrophical events, The Younger Dryas and the South-Eastward migrations to refuges . . 223.5 Birth of the Proto-Indo-Europeans in the European refuge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253.6 Warming up and Leaking Out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    4 Conclusion 27

    iii

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    5/36

    List of Figures

    1 Forms of Amanita Muscaria (fly agaric), note the eye/sun/wheel shape in the top right . . 62 Ephedra: an energizing plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Peganum Harmala (Syrian Rue): an MAOI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Psilocybin aka Magic mushrooms: here growing in cow dung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

    5 Worldwide distribution of psilocybin mushrooms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Nelumbo Nucifera, the sacred lotus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Cannabis Sativa L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Human Migrations : 65000-40000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 Human Migrations : 40000-19000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1310 Chauvet Cave Painting, South of France, around 32000 BP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1411 Earth Biomes during the Last glacial Maximum (18000BP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1512 Extent of major glaciers at the height of the last ice age (20,000 b.p.), source : anthro.palomar.edu 1613 Evolution of temperature and snow in the arctic since the last glacial maximum . . . . . . . . 1714 Boat with fishermen next to a whale, Pegtymel, Beringia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1815 Animation from 21000BP to 1000AP by the Zurich University of applied science, source:youtube 1816 A man drinking psychoactive urine from deers, Siberia (credit:erowid) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1917 Present day Amanita Muscarias territory and shamanic tribes (credit:erowid) . . . . . . . . . 19

    18 Petroglyphs next to the Pegtymel River, Northeast Siberia. Note deer like animals and mush-room people. Amanita M. is still traditionally used in the pegtymel region. . . . . . . . . . . 20

    19 Here we have the McKee Springs Petroglyphs, Dinosaur National Monument, Utah and Col-orado. We can see the symbology of the PPIE such as horse riders, deers, wheels, mushroom-headed creatures... There are even creatures half-human, half-animal, like in the symbologyof Pan. Visions of such creatures are well known to psychonauts (people who experiment withmind-altering substances). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    20 Moab, Utah, the design is similar to the Swastika, a recognized indo-european symbol. It issimilar to the Basque cross as well, suggesting a possibly enduring symbol across the Paleolithicand across continents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    21 Hyperborea according to Mercator 1595, notice the swastika-like design (source:wikipedia).Could it be that PPIE were mapmakers and that a cartographer from the renaissance inheritedthe heritage of these maps ? Could it be that this legendary land really existed and that the

    swastika was a symbol of the PPIEs urheimat ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2122 Suspected area of impact of the meteors at the beginning of the Younger Dryas . . . . . . . . 2223 Abstract of Iyengars paper (2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2324 Present day distribution of the X2A Haplotype . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2325 Extract from Bennett, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    iv

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    6/36

    1 Introduction

    When I first conceived this research project, I intended it to be about the ancient plant medicines of Chinaand India. I started making my bibliography, looking at the representation of plants in ancient Easternmythology. While reading Sigerist (1987), I stumbled upon the plant Soma : A whole book of the Rigvedawas devoted to Soma, and the sacrifice to him took a central place in Vedic ritual. Drinking of Soma brought

    ecstasy, protection from disease, and cure of many ailments.

    The Rigveda is the earliest of the four collections of Vedic Sanskrit hymns called the Vedas, which areconsidered as a repository of orally-transmitted knowledge which is not from human origin). It is one of theoldest documents in any Indo-European language, and is probably the oldest sacred text still in use today.No other mythological plant could equal the status of Soma. but what was it? One of my source (Lehner,1960 ed.2012) identified the plant as Sarcostemma Acidum but I knew already it may not be the correctidentification of Soma.

    Indeed, I had heard about the book Soma: Divine mushroom of immortalityby Gordon Wasson (1971)which argued for the identification of Amanita Muscaria as the original Soma, and read Food of the Gods:The Search for the original tree of knowledge(1992) in which McKenna suggested that Soma could be themushroom psilocybe cubsensis. I then read Blue Tide: The search for Soma(Jay, 1999) where the hypoth-

    esis of Syrian Rue (Peganum Harmala) as Soma was presented. I knew then, without a doubt, that thestudy of the legendary medicinal plant Soma was a vast subject in and out of itself, so I decided to concen-trate on it, and isolate the other mythological plants from my study. But no field of study is independent,and I was led back to other Ancient Eurasiatic Mythologies than the Vedas, in which Amanita Muscariaor Cannabis are thought to have played a role in. I discovered most of the countries with a tradition ofa soma-like plant were part of the same language family : indo-european. Could it be that the myth ofSoma was inherited from a time when a Eurasiatic people, the Proto-Indo-Europeans, spoke the same lan-guage? How did the knowledgeable Vedic culture arise out of the melting of the glaciers after the last ice age ?

    I had so many questions in my mind, I felt so deeply connected to the subject, that it gave me themotivation to plunge into the vast fields of study which, you will see, surrounds Soma. I wanted to knowhow the Soma plant had influenced Eurasians in the Upper Paleolithic (50000-10000 BCE), and as luckwould have it, that is the subject of the present research paper.

    To begin, we will study the scholastic history that has been surrounding the subject of Soma for centuries.Knowing the historicity of the ideas presented in this subject will greatly facilitate the understanding of thecurrent scholastic debates, in which we are going to dive into. We will study the different plant candidatesfor Soma, notably the recent proposal by Chris Bennett from his book Cannabis and the Soma Solution(2010). I will also bring new evidence to support Wassons claim that Amanita Muscaria was the originalSoma.

    But there are some parts of Wassons argument which we have to abandon. When he wrote his book in1970, the Vedic people were said to have had a very different history than the one which is now favored, forinstance it is very probable that the Vedic culture is at least 10000 years old, and not 3500 as was assumedthen.This new dating pushes us back to the beginning of the Neolithic. What was the history of the Vedic people

    10000 years ago ? Where did they originate from ? Could it be from the circumpolar regions ? Was therethe place were the proto-indo-european language was invented ? Was Soma a catalyst for the developmentof language ? And agriculture ?

    Finally we will retrace the most probable narrative for the plant Soma among the Pre-Proto-Indo-europeans and eurasiatic people in general. We will see how it influenced religion, folklore, and the de-velopment of knowledge across its long history. We will, in the end, look at the present situation of Somaand the reasons for it. I will then conclude with an opening on the possible future of Soma among humankind.

    1

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    7/36

    2 Scholastic History

    2.1 Indo-European Studies

    After centuries of limited intellectual debate, the Middle Ages ended in Europe with the advent of theRenaissance. A new epoch of enlightenment began, an era in which Europeans began to be interested infar-distant and ancient cultures such as that of India. Travellers came back from this Orient with incrediblestories, and new ideas. Among them was the idea that Eastern languages could be related to European lan-guages, as F. Sassetti pointed out in the 16th century, reporting striking similarities between Sanskrit andItalian (Muller, 1986). This idea got considerable repercussions. It implied that the limits of our supposedEuropean culture stretched much further than Greece and the middle-East. If Indians and Europeans hadsome deep commonalities in their languages, then they must have shared a common past. This eventuallycontributed to the cultural movement of Orientalism which emerged a couple of centuries later.

    In 1786, Sir William Jones made this observation :The Sanskrit language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect than the

    Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of thema stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and the forms of grammar, than could possibly have beenproduced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing

    them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists; there is a similar reason,though not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Gothic and the Celtic, though blended with a verydifferent idiom, had the same origin with the Sanscrit; and the old Persian might be added to the samefamily.

    This common-source came to be named Proto-Indo-European. The study of the Indian culture andSanskrit continued throughout the 19th and 20th century. Scholars tried to understand where the commonancestors of the Indo-Europeans came from and who they were. Only recently have Indian scholars enteredthe debate of their origins, and many alternative visions have emerged. There has been a lot of debate aroundthis sometimes thorny subject, which has had the benefit of arousing a considerable amount of research and,with such a variety of views, making the subject ever richer.

    2

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    8/36

    2.2 Sanskrit and Proto-Indo-European

    To understand the Aryans is to understand the Sanskrit language, and in particular Vedic Sanskrit; whichis not without its delights. Sanskrit is the oldest known indo-european language (probably together withHittite), some people even argue that it is the original proto-indo-european language, but most scholarsagree it traces its history back to Proto-Indo-Iranian and Proto-Indo-European. The pre-classical form ofSanskrit is called Vedic, or Rigvedic Sanskrit. The term refers to the language spoken in the Rigveda, themost ancient sacred text, a collection of hymns constituting a repository of ancient knowledge which wasorally transmitted for millenia until it was written down in the second millenium B.C. (around 1700-1500B.C. according to Doniger (2009, chap.5).

    Whatever the root of the matter is, Rigvedic Sanskrit must be very similar to the original indo-europeanlanguage, and therefore it informs us on our earliest common indo-european culture. Indeed culture andknowledge are fundamentally x from the language associated with them. Without a certain language, youcannot produce certain technologies, or certain ideas. Language is fundamentally interdependent with culture: the proto-indo-european (PIE) language ,or Sanskrit itself , helped shape our technological and culturaldevelopment. It was certainly thanks to PIE that Aryans could develop one of the most advanced civiliza-tion known so far back in history, and that eventually our own indo-european-dominated world civilizationemerged.

    Their is a lot of dispute as to the probable age of indo-european languages. For a long time, PIE wasbelieved to have originated around 3500 B.C. before divergence began. However, in 2003, a study publishedin Science concluded that the common root of the 144 so-called Indo-European languages was spoken around9800 and 7800 years ago by Neolithic farmers in Anatolia (Balter, 2003), in central Turkey, pushing backthe initial divergence much further in the past. Nevertheless, the glottochronological method applied tothis research, inspired from models of evolutionary biomolecular sequences, is disputed as being adequate topredict the age of a language. Some PIE is younger, some believe it is older. The proponents of the youngerhypothesis have their bases and biases in linguistic and archaeological evidence. These kind of evidenceusually belong to an approximate 10000 years time-frame, and so everything which happened in historyshould happen in that timeframe. The proponents of the older hypothesis often base their dating lookingat the available literature. Astronomical events, recorded in old sanskrit texts, can indeed suggest eventshappening far into the palaeolithic, up to around 20000 B.C. Each dating is fundamentally linked to a scenario

    of how indo-european languages spread, and therefore to a scenario for the indo-european migrations. Inthis essay I will discuss a scenario for the Pre-Proto-Indo-Europeans (PPIEs) and the Proto-Indo-Europeans(PIEs). The proposed scenario is not incompatible with the different theories on Indo-European migrations.

    3

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    9/36

    2.3 The RigVeda

    As mentionned earlier, the Rigveda is the most ancient sacred text in any indo-european language, and infact it could be the worlds oldest religious text with some of its passages being said to refer to a time 10000years into the past, or even earlier. Vartaka argues that the earliest portions of Rig Veda were composed in23720 BCE (1999). The Rigveda is the earliest of the four books that constitute the Vedas, a collection ofhymns that are still at the center of Hinduism. The Rigveda is also the Worlds largest religious text witha bit more than a thousand hymns, ten thousand verses and ten books. These hymns are supposed to bechanted, and in fact have been so for several thousands of years until the present (some spiritual schools stillmaintain the oral-tradition today) (Crowley, 1993). They began being written down, often on birch barksheets and ink (it is relevant as we will see later), probably in the second or first millennium BC (Teeter,2007) .

    The Rigveda is composed of two roots: Rig meaning praise and Veda meaning knowledge. Indeed theRigveda is considered a repository of ancient knowledge, where the knowledge has been encoded in stories.The style of writing is both poetic and very precise. Sanskrit itself has been said to be the most scientificlanguage (Brown, before 2003, pub.2011). As time passed on, the stories became myths, and some of theoriginal meanings associated with the story were lost, bound, perhaps, to be rediscovered later. One elementwhich was lost in time was the identity of Soma. Solving this riddle opens up vast vistas of possibility

    concerning the indo-european heritage, which will constitute the purpose of this paper.

    4

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    10/36

    2.4 What is Soma in the Rig Veda?

    In the Rigveda, Soma is considered to be both a god (deva), an entheogenic plant (entheogen being a termcoined by Wasson to describe mind-altering plants or chemicals which provide a divine experience) (Williams,2009), and the juice from that plant (the nectar, amrita, being the food of the Gods (Jansen, 2007). As aGod, Soma can be considered as inter-related with the Gods Indra (the lord of the thunderbolt), and Agni(righteousness) (Mahdihassan, 1991). According to Turner and Coulter (2000, p.438), the deity Soma is amoon god, a god of plants, a god of the flowing waters, a god of ecstasy and inspiration. It was widelyworshipped during the Vedic and Puranic periods. He is often refered to as the eye of Varuna (the moon) andMitra (the sun). Soma is immortal and bestows immortality to those who drink it. According to Williams,Soma was used by Brahmin priests in order to be deeply connected with the Gods during Vedic Rituals,such as the fire ceremony. Soma offered sustenance and energy to the Gods and ecstasy to the user.

    In the table below are some of the descriptions and names of Soma in the Rigveda (Teeter, 2007)) :

    5

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    11/36

    2.5 The mystery of soma

    Besides being considered the father of comparative linguistics and Indo-European studies, Sir W. Jones wasalso the initiator of the debate on the identity of Soma (sanskrit), when he suggested in 1794 that haoma(Avestan for Soma) was a species of Mountain rue (Peganum Harmala) (Bedrosian, 2000). This was onlythe first suggestion in a long list of pretenders that came afterwards. Indeed the mystery of Soma lies in itsbiological identity. Was it henbane ? Alcohol ? Or even rhubarb ? None of the plants the Western scholarsthought of really fitted the description of Soma.

    2.5.1 Amanita Muscaria

    Nevertheless, in 1957, Gordon Wasson, showed that magical foods were not figments of our imaginations(revealed in our mythologies, which are magical stories) but really existed, when he published an articlein Life Magazine where he described the first experience of magic mushrooms by a westerner in centuries.This was the first milestone of the field of study of ethnomycology: the study of the relationships betweenhumans and fungi. In 1970, Wasson entered the debate by proposing the original soma of the Rigveda wasthe mushroom Amanita Muscaria (commonly known as fly agaric), and that its origins could be traced backto the sacred element of many northern siberian shamanic tribes (Wasson, 1971). Wassons thesis quicklybecame the most solid one when it came out, and the Amanita Muscaria is still considered today by manyscholars as the most probable original soma plant. But Wasson wasnt unrivaled too long, and soon after,

    many scholars of ethnobotamy and ethnomycology came to challenge his idea.

    Figure 1: Forms of Amanita Muscaria (fly agaric), note the eye/sun/wheel shape in the top right

    6

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    12/36

    Figure 2: Ephedra: an energizing plant

    2.5.2 Ephedra

    The same year, indeed, John Brough came to remind the community that it wasnt proven (yet) that Somawas a psychedelic drink. Instead he believed Soma to have been Ephedra : [it] is a powerful stimulant, andwould thus be a more plausible preparation for warriors about to go into battle than the fly-agaric, which is adepressant (Brough, 1971). Brough was wrong saying it was a depressant, he did not know the entheogenic

    effects of Amanita Muscaria due to the lack of psychopharmacological knowledge on the mushroom at histime. Today we know that the preparation of Soma, which is refered to at length in the Rigveda, plays animportant role on the effects of Amanita Muscaria (Feeney, 2010). Moreover, Ilya Greshevitch, an iranolo-gist, showed than in small doses amanita muscaria was indeed a stimulant (1974).

    7

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    13/36

    Figure 3: Peganum Harmala (Syrian Rue): an MAOI

    2.5.3 Syrian Rue aka Peganum Harmala

    In 1989, Flattery and Schwartz proposed Syrian Rue, a semi-desertic shrub, as the identity of Soma. Theirargument involved a lot of linguistic evidence and evidence of ancestral use. Nevertheless the trip reports ofPeganum Harmala (erowid.org, 2014) fail to account for the effects described in the rigveda. Peganum har-mala contains Mono-Amine-Oxydase inhibitors, such proteins are found in the ayahuasca brew of the amazonwhere it is brewed with a plant containing Di-methyl-tryptamine (DMT), an hormone similar to serotonin.It could be that syrian rue was used in conjunction with a DMT-containing plant that remains unknown, orwith psilocybin, from magic mushrooms, which resemble serotonin too. This idea called pharmahuasca orSomahuasca has been given support by Hromada (2012), showing a co-occurrence of Peganum Harmalaand Phalaris Aquatica plants.

    Once again the entheogen theory was challenged by the supporters of ephedra, this time in the personof Harry Falk who argued there was no evidence Soma was a psychedelic brew in the first place (1989). Helater also argued against urine drinking of soma, a strong key to Wassons argument (2002).

    8

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    14/36

    2.5.4 Psilocybe Cubensis

    In 1992, McKenna showed in his book Food of the Gods: the search for the original tree of knowledge theimportance psilocybin mushrooms played in prehistory, he suggested they would have given us better vision;psychopharmacologically moderated value systems that worked to feminize values while the masculine valuesbegan to take the upper hand with the advent of the neolithic around 12000 years ago; and that they helpeddevelop language. Considering Soma in an Indian context, he believed psilocybin containing mushroomscould explain the cow worship of India, these mushrooms being dung-lovers. Whats more, psilocybinseffects are similar to those inferred from the rigveda.

    Figure 4: Psilocybin aka Magic mushrooms: here growing in cow dung

    Figure 5: Worldwide distribution of psilocybin mushrooms

    9

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    15/36

    Figure 6: Nelumbo Nucifera, the sacred lotus

    2.5.5 Nelumbo nucifera

    In 2000, Spess added Nelumbo Nucifera (aka the Sacred Lotus) to the list of Soma candidates, showing adetailed botanical and iconographical analysis. He reinforced his argument in 2011 showing that the plantcould be psychoactive, producing feelings of euphoria when ingested.

    10

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    16/36

    Figure 7: Cannabis Sativa L.

    2.5.6 Cannabis

    Although it was proposed quite early, in the 1895th edition of folklore (jacobs et al.) in the article Argumentthat the Soma plant was bhang (a preparation of hemp), the theory of Cannabis as Soma seems to havebeen overlooked by most scholars for much of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, many scholars notablyIndians such as Mukherjee (1921), Ray (1939), Chandra Chakraberty (1944-52-63-67) and others. Thereis a recent scholarly book, Cannabis and the Soma solution by Chris Bennett (2010), that sums up thearguments gathered through the twentieth century around the idea that Soma was cannabis (sometimes

    called hemp, bhang in hindi). Providing archaeological and linguistic evidence, Bennetts compilation is inmy view convincing.

    2.6 Soma as a function rather than a specific plant

    If we look at the debate surrounding the identity of Soma, we see many candidates, sometimes far-fetchedarguments, sometimes very likely ones. In all the plants I have researched the most: psilocybe cubensis,peganum Harmala, ephedra, Amanita Muscaria and cannabis; I have not found any of these theories tobe totally unlikely, and my belief is that they are all true, although their truth depends on the time andlocation of the study. That Soma came to be known as a function, as a category of plants that inducedchanges in consciousness (of which I count ephedra which is a stimulant even if not hallucinogenic). Thereis some evidence that these plants/mushrooms may have been use in combination : So, for the first timein the world archaeological practice, monumental temples were found in which intoxicating beverages of the

    soma-haoma type were prepared for cult ceremonies. ... the excavations documentally proved that poppy,cannabis and ephedra were used for making the soma-haoma drinks, and thickets of these plants were foundin excess in the vicinity of the excavated temples of Margiana (Sarianidi, 2003). Rudgley, who studied thearchaeological site cited that clealy both these psychoactive substances [cannabis and ephedra] had beenused in conjunction in the making of hallucinogenic drinks (Bennett, 2010).

    11

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    17/36

    3 Soma through Indo-European migrations and exchanges

    The different identities of Soma must have depended on where the people were. If the Vedic people originatedin India, it is unlikely that it would have been the fly agaric, as it is quite uncommon there. Peganum harmalawould have been consumed next to semi-desertic regions. We are looking for the original Soma(s). Thisquestion should help us: What was the original home of the proto-indo europeans ? We should go back

    in time into the early roots of man in Europe around 40000 BP to find out who were the pre-proto-indo-europeans. Their spiritual practices could show a continuity of culture until the beginning of the neolithic,and, in a way, until the present day. I will try to show that different hypotheses for the original home(urheimat) of the Indo-Europeans are not mutually exclusive but rather can be seen as successive events.

    3.1 Lets go back in time

    It is funny to think that every individual on the planet today originate from common ancestors, individualpeople who far back in time were born with a mutation, had sex, and passed it down through generationsof successfully surviving humans moving through different parts of the planet. The genetic prevalence ofcertain haplotypes today can help us understand who our ancestors were and where they came from. Thisis called DNA evidence, and it is more foolproof than linguistics while it enlightens archaeology. In this partI will guide you through a simple introduction to human migrations beginning 40000 years ago.

    Figure 8: Human Migrations : 65000-40000

    12

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    18/36

    3.2 Art and The first hu-mans: the Eurasiatic people before the Last GlacialMaximum (LGM)

    Figure 9: Human Migrations : 40000-19000

    Beginning 40000 years ago, humans began to invade the northern latitudes of Eurasia, including thearctic circle. These people were hunters and gatherers, and probably moved slowly northwards following biggame, which itself was moving according to the changing climates, going in zig zag directions between eastand west. Dr. Fu and al., in an article published in nature, state, after recovering and sequencing the DNAfrom a thighbone of a male hunter-gatherer who lived 45,000 years ago in what is now Siberia that Theancient Siberian was related equally to West European hunter-gatherers, North Asian hunter-gatherers, EastAsians, and the indigenous people of the Andaman Islands off South Asia. ... The findings have sweepingimplications and provide a basis for reinterpreting key dates in human prehistory (2014). I will supportmy argument on this idea that there was a multi-cultural and cross-genetic exchange going on since far back

    13

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    19/36

    Figure 10: Chauvet Cave Painting, South of France, around 32000 BP

    into the paleolithic all across Eurasia. I will follow their suggestion to reinterpret key dates in history.

    50000 years ago, it was a time of great change for the human species. For the first time in the archeao-logical record we see the birth of Art, in no other site than the masterpiece of the cave of Chauvet in France(as portrayed in Erzogs movie Cave of Forgotten Dreams). This artwork reveals self-awareness from thepainters. Perhaps self-awareness, which we think makes humans so special, occurred between 45000 and30000 BP (it could have been a worldwide phenomenon as Rupert Sheldrakes research in morphogeneticfields suggests (1988)). McKenna argues that in the process of discovering new food sources to survive, itwas very likely that humans encountered entheogens. If they were psilocybin mushrooms, they would haveprovided survival advantages to the users who would have included it in their diets. Psychedelics wouldhave been a catalyst for the development of self-awareness, language and spirituality. The cave of Chauvet,despite being in a region rich in psilocybe mushrooms as the figure 5 shows, doesnt describe any psychedelicplants but majestic animals which once inhabited the land : mammoths, deers, cows, rhinos and horses,which are all animals which were described in the Vedas (Doniger, p.54).

    It was a sign of a deep desire to communicate with other humans. Perhaps, just as they tried to depictanimals with simple sketches, they may have begun to speak a simple language based on the sounds whichthe objects inspired them; just like we often do when we forget a word and imitate the sound of the object(Bakshi, 2006).

    This is where we get the earliest roots of indo-european words, such as the ones described in the study byPagel et al. (2013) which found that Indo-European languages came from a common root, a proto-Eurasian,about 15,000 years ago.

    I suppose Pagel is wrong in his timing and that these roots are thousands of years older, language doesnot give indications of time despite all the efforts of the linguists to make us believe so (Gray and al., 2011).We cannot define a constant rate of change for a language for instance, it is an unjustified assumption. Thiswas not restricted to France of course, but was a pan-eurasiatic phenomenon (Panshin).

    14

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    20/36

    3.3 The first transport revolution

    3.3.1 Domestication of the horse and dogs

    Somewhere close to or in the Eurasian steppe, humans began to domesticate horses. According to thewikipedia article on the domestication of the horse :

    The true horse, which ranged from western Europe to eastern Beringia, included prehistoric horses andthe Przewalskis Horse, as well as what is now the modern domestic horse, belonged to a single Holarcticspecies. A more detailed analysis of the true horses grouped them into two major clades. One of theseclades, which seemed to have been restricted to North America, is now extinct. The other clade was broadlydistributed from North America to central Europe, north and south of Pleistocene ice sheets (Weinstock,2005). It became extinct in Beringia around 14,200 years ago, and in the rest of the Americas around 10,000years ago (Luis et al., 2006). This clade survived in Eurasia, however, and it is from these horses which alldomestic horses appear to have descended.(Buck et al., 2007)

    Figure 11: Earth Biomes during the Last glacial Maximum (18000BP)

    Between 35000 and 15000 years ago was also the timeframe in which Eurasiatic people domesticated thedog (Freedman and al.,2014). Hopkins in The Dog in the Rig-Veda (1894) showed how intimate dogs wereto the proto-indo-europeans. With horses to travel, dogs to protect them, and a vast and game-abundantEurasian steppe, the Paleolithic saw the first transport revolution in history and took advantage of it. Menwere probably following game, wherever it may lead them, while women, children and elders would be lessnomadic (Wilson, 1999). If we take the hunters point of view, he is nearly constantly in a state of alertness,

    to pray or not be prayed upon. If the words were very simple, it would suggest that syntactic thinkingwas very limited. Instead, due to the circumstances, the Paleolithic people had a natural tendency to bein a meditative state. In that spirit they may have had little awareness of time, no idea of a future or apast. Bakshi speaks of this as the time of anomalous cognition : Recent research seems to suggest thatthere was perhaps a basic biological mechanism, a basic psi function that occurred early in the process ofhuman evolution. A sort of a generalized, intuitive instinct emerged, which was possibly an excellent tool forsurvival in a age teeming with predators. He suggest that the worlds first information Age could have beenbased on knowledge gained through anomalous processes of intuition and other paranormal abilities.(2006,p.6). This is reminiscent of the Paradisal state when humans, spirits and animals communicated together;which is actually the core myth of the shamanic traditions that would come afterwards (Eliade, 1964).

    15

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    21/36

    3.3.2 Movements and Migrations

    By 25000 BP, these Eurasians had colonized much of the continent from arctic Beringia all the way downto Spain. Worsley and al. showed that arctic climates had been favourable during the pleistocene, with thearctic being intermittently free of ice (1980). Elias confirmed this thesis with Paleoecology (2001).

    In between 40000 and 25000BP, a land bridge opened in Beringia, which provided a passage into Americathrough Alaska. For three thousands years, Eurasian people sharing similar ways of life would have evolvedside by side, and side by side with the entheogens Cannabis and Amanita Muscaria. The generally acceptedview considering the origins of cannabis is in Central, West and Northwest China, although it could alsobe in the Hindu Kush Mountains of India. Amanita Muscaria, on the other hand seems to originate inBeringia (Geml and al., 2006). I dont know when these plants and fungi originated, but by the time of thePaleo-eurasians they may have already conquered Eurasia via natural ways (although the movement of seedscaused by humans could have been a contributing factor to the spread).

    Figure 12: Extent of major glaciers at the height of the last ice age (20,000 b.p.), source : anthro.palomar.edu

    16

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    22/36

    3.3.3 The Ice Age until the end of the last glacial maximum

    Beginning 26500 years, the Last Glacial Maximum pointed its nose : a period of unusual cold, even foran ice-age. Suddenly the northern lands and routes closed, the game began to migrate southwards, andeventually so did the humans. They settle in refuges, places where the climate was tolerable and wherethe wildlife had taken refuge too. This climatic event compressed human movement, and eventually led themto live closer together than they had been before. I believe this was a time of great development for theEurasiatic language. In winter, some of these eurasians, enjoying the leisure time, might have partaken intheir favorite treats: mind-altering substances. For the purposes of simplicity, we will assume that AmanitaMuscaria had a central place in the lives of these Eurasian people during the Last Glacial Maximum, somuch so that it contributed to the development of a strong culture : that of the pre-proto-indo-europeans(PPIE) : a mammoth-hunting, horse riding, deer/elk(bull) herding mushroom-worshipping culture.

    Figure 13: Evolution of temperature and snow in the arctic since the last glacial maximum

    By the way, hunting huge game like mammoths would have needed the development of planification andcooperation, a pre-requisite of which is communication. Mammoth would have been a great source of meat,fur for clothing and housing, and bones for shelters. Herding could have been the charge of the women,as is still visible in the Sami Culture of Sweden and Norway (Kuokkanen, 2009), while hunting was thetask of men. It seems unlikely that, in the harsh conditions which we describe, gathering would have beenprevalent. Most of the food would have come from hunting, therefore, unlike other more warmer regions ofthe globe where humans would have relied prevalently on gathering, men in Northern Eurasia would havebeen the main providers of food for the tribe. This could suggest these PPIE developed patriarchal societies,such as the one described in the Rigveda (Wilson, 1999). PPIEs could also have been sailors and fishermen.There is no evidence for it in the Rig Veda, yet it does not mean these people werent the ancestors of thePIE. Indeed, unless the word is used in rituals, or other means which can show great continuity throughtime, words for fishing practices would have disappeared if the populations lived for a long time away fromseashores (Bennett, 1962). In this fashion, many words could have appeared and disappeared, bound to bereinvented again later.

    17

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    23/36

    Figure 14: Boat with fishermen next to a whale, Pegtymel, Beringia

    3.3.4 Arctic roots and routes

    15000 years ago the climate warmed up and the glaciers started to melt. The PPIE re-deployed in theirvast garden ranging from the Arctic circle to Western Europe, with some people exploiting the beringian

    land bridge to get in and out of America.

    Figure 15: Animation from 21000BP to 1000AP by the Zurich University of applied science, source:youtube

    By 14000BP onwards, plants began to reconquer the land which was previously buried under the ice.The first ones to do so were the pioneer species, the birch tree being the most common in high latitudes.The amanita muscaria is actually a mycorrhizae mushroom whose favorite trees are birch and pine trees,which would have been the kind of vegetation in the arctic and subarctic regions of the temporarily warm

    era (according to figure 13, between 15000 and 12800 years ago). In this time the uncovered arctic regionwould have been full with amanita muscaria mushrooms, both in Northern and Central Eurasia, Beringiaand North America. It is interesting to note that deers and elks get high on fly agarics, it may have givenrise to the deer Goddess cults of Asia (Jacobson, 1993).

    18

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    24/36

    Indeed raw mushrooms are toxic, but the urine of the user, while still containing the psychoactivity,doesnt have as many toxic compounds, which is advantageous for human consumption. One major argu-ment of Wasson in favor of the Amanita Muscaria as Soma was that there were references to urine drinkingin the Rig Veda, with priests eating the mushroom first while the rest of the people had their urine to drink.Urine drinking is contested by Falk and Bennett (2010), among other scholars, who believe Wasson to havemade a misinterpretation of the original text.

    Figure 16: A man drinking psychoactive urine from deers, Siberia (credit:erowid)

    Figure 17: Present day Amanita Muscarias territory and shamanic tribes (credit:erowid)

    19

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    25/36

    3.3.5 Rock Art Traces

    There are many cave and rock paintings/engravings/sculptures in Eurasia, the Beringian region and NorthAmerica. They suggest the presence of a similar culture on both sides of the strait as we shall see in thesymbol analysis.

    Different studies have recently shown that psychoactive use had been common in the Paleolithic in theOld World (Merlin, 2003). Altered states of consciousness have been associated with the development ofbiology and consciousness, which can be inferred from the creation of art in the Paleolithic (Froese and al.,2013), corroborating Abrahams argument that Geometric Thinking was born in the Paleolithic (2011). Inthe next images, there are easy to interpret symbols. I would suggest that the symbol of the wheel (includingcircles and swastikas) was associated with the circular motion of the stars above the arctic circle, the cap ofthe Amanita mushroom, which might have eventually inspired them the invention of the wheel.

    Figure 18: Petroglyphs next to thePegtymel River, Northeast Siberia.Note deer like animals and mushroompeople. Amanita M. is still tradition-ally used in the pegtymel region.

    Figure 19: Here we have the McKeeSprings Petroglyphs, Dinosaur NationalMonument, Utah and Colorado. We cansee the symbology of the PPIE such ashorse riders, deers, wheels, mushroom-headed creatures... There are even

    creatures half-human, half-animal, likein the symbology of Pan. Visions ofsuch creatures are well known to psy-chonauts (people who experiment withmind-altering substances).

    20

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    26/36

    Figure 20: Moab, Utah,the design is similar tothe Swastika, a recognizedindo-european symbol. Itis similar to the Basquecross as well, suggesting apossibly enduring symbolacross the Paleolithic andacross continents.

    Figure 21: Hyperborea according toMercator 1595, notice the swastika-like design (source:wikipedia). Could

    it be that PPIE were mapmakers andthat a cartographer from the renais-sance inherited the heritage of thesemaps ? Could it be that this leg-endary land really existed and thatthe swastika was a symbol of thePPIEs urheimat ?

    There is a myth in the ancient greek culture of some legendary people who lived in hyper-borea (beyondthe north wind). J.G.Bennett (1962) proposed that the original indo-europeans lived in Hyperborea andthat they were the legendary people Herodotus referred to. Bennett was building on Tilaks idea of an Arctichome described in the Vedas (1906). Even though the idea could have seemed far-fetched, there is now a

    consensus building in the scholastic community that if they did not live in the arctic, Indo-Europeans musthave had at least some presence in the subarctic regions. Concerning soma, Ruck (1983) argued that theofferings of the hyperboreans referred to in Greek mythology were mushrooms coming from the North-East,probably Amanita Muscaria.

    21

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    27/36

    3.4 Catastrophical events, The Younger Dryas and the South-Eastward migra-tions to refuges

    Eventually, this inter-continental, culturally related people who had been thriving due to the improvingclimate, saw a great catastrophe that would inhabit their minds until the present day (Petaev, 2013). Therewas suddenly an abrupt climate change (see figure 13) which led to the extinction of many humans but alsobig animals such as the mammoth and the saber-tooth tiger (Nogues-Bravo and al., 2008).

    There are different hypotheses for what led to this event which is thought to have occurred around 13000years ago. There is the comets or meteorites hypothesis (Cohen, 2014).These celestial ob jects would havebrought devastation in the Northern hemisphere, perhaps leading to huge wildfires that if they didnt killeveryone on their path, left an inhabitable landscape. There is the Pole Shift hypothesis, which says that,during a Pole shift, the geomagnetic field shielding life from radiation is disturbed, leading to mutationsand disease. Some proponents of that theory, such as Hapgood and his friend Einstein (Hapgood, 1958), gofurther saying that the stress of a polar shift could be so dramatic as to make the earth crust drifts overthe magma that supports it, generating fast changing climates (with ecosystems drifting in different latitudethan the ones they evolved into). There is also the possibility of another major cosmological event such asthe explosion of a Supernova not too far from Earth (relatively of course). The last thesis is that of volcanicactivity (Oppenheimer, 2011). These theses are not mutually exclusive.

    Figure 22: Suspected area of impact of the meteors at the beginning of the Younger Dryas

    22

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    28/36

    I believe all these theories could be true. Earth crustal displacement caused by a polar shift and/orimpacts would have led to volcanic activity. Mostly I believe in the meteorites theory, based on an analysisof the Rig Veda by Iyengar (2009) stating :

    Figure 23: Abstract of Iyengars paper (2009)

    So lets sum up, there was a catastrophic event, which gave rise to what could be called hell on earth.I believe this is the reason for the fall of mankind that world myths including the bible and shamanism talkabout. Eventually the younger dryas cooling that followed the event was just as much of a stress on species,who had been used to warmer temperatures for a while.

    Humans were not finished with unfavourable conditions because the Continental Ice then began to meltproducing great floods due to rapid warming (an important topic in the Rig Veda). The PPIE had to flee themost disastered places on earth after the impacts. They began moving to the South-West in the directionof the refuge in Ukraine/Anatolia (Mallory, 2001).

    Figure 24: Present day distribution ofthe X2A Haplotype

    The distribution of the Haplotype X2A shows that at one point in history, some of what are now Euro-peans and Native Americans would have been the same people. The (apparent) absence of Indo-Europeanlanguages in America suggests that Proto-Indo-European was developed after that split.

    23

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    29/36

    On their way to the Western refuge, the PPIEs would have passed through present-day China and theEurasian steppe. There they could have encountered Cannabis, growing wild in this part of the world.Indeed, Cannabis is a very resilient plant, it can adapt to rapidly changing climates and seasons. Cannabiscan adapt its growth cycle to the place where it grows. It is possible for instance to grow cannabis inAlaska or Finland. PPIEs could have transported the very nutritious seeds of that plant all the way back toEurope/Anatolia. The use of Cannabis by the PPIEs or PIEs is suggested by the ubiquity and similarity in

    the plant name in different PIE languages today.

    Figure 25: Extract from Bennett, 2010

    Whats more, as Bennett underlines, the ability of phytocannabinoids to improve smell, night vision anddiscern edges would have enhanced the fitness of a hunter-gatherer society (Bennett, 2010, p.74/856)

    24

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    30/36

    3.5 Birth of the Proto-Indo-Europeans in the European refuge

    Eventually, the PPIEs who were composed of many different tribes reached the Ural, possibily installingthemselves in Ukraine or Anatolia, or both, which are located in between the meteorites crash sites of West-ern Europe and America (and possibly Beringia). Extreme climatic events would have restrained the PPIEsmobility. In this place and era (between 12000 and 9000 years ago), humans were perhaps more concentratedthan they ever had been before. The situation may have been like this : Western Europeans, Eurasians,and perhaps previous-Americans were cohabiting next to each other. As was pointed out before, they mayhave had similarities in the languages they spoke. The multi-cultural environment would have fostered thedevelopment of culture, that is language (as McKenna said, culture is an operating system coded in language).

    The people we are talking about could be considered to be the Proto-Indo-Europeans. Using thepsychedelics at their disposal (Amanita Muscaria, Cannabis, and possibly psilocybe mushrooms) they wouldhave developped new words. In teh words of McKenna :

    This is what were talking about here psychedelics as a catalyst to the human imagination, psychedelicsas a catalyst for language, because what cannot be said, cannot be created by the community. So that weneed then, is the forced evolution of language, and the way to do that is to go back to agents that createdlanguage in the very first place. And that means, the psychedelic plants, the Gaian Logos, and the mysteri-

    ous beckoning extraterrestrial minds beyond. Hooking ourselves back up, into the chakras of the hierarchyof nature, turning ourselves over to the mind of the Totally Other that created us and brought us forth outof animal organization. (McKenna, Alien Dreamtime, 1993).

    McKennas assertions that psychedelics are catalysts for the development of language are based in earlypsychedelic research (before they were banned worldwide) like Aaronson and al.s paper which compiledwhat was known in 1970 on the effects of psychedelic experience on language functioning. New findings havebeen exposed by Slattery (2005) who talks about the noetic connection between synaesthesia, psychedelicsand language. Tupper (2002) linked entheogens to existential intelligence (which is an obvious feature of thepeople who composed the Vedas) showing that plant teachers could be used as cognitive tools.

    The limited space available to the PIEs around 12000 years ago would have created a stress for hunter-gatherer societies, who would have turned to agriculture and pastoralism (with Cannabis and barley beingsome of the cultivated plants, and cattle/deer and horse herding), reinforcing exchanges and the creation

    of the first societies. Astronomy would have been developed a lot during that time as well, to understandthe catastrophes of the past and predict the future ones, and to develop agriculture (which depends onastronomical cycles). The devastation of the last Ice Age would also have encouraged the PPIEs to jointogether. As society would have complexified, humans became more and more disconnected from nature,and Soma became part of a ritual (Staal, 2001).

    25

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    31/36

    3.6 Warming up and Leaking Out

    When passages out of the Ukrainian/Anatolian refuge became safe to travel again, the PIEs would havespread in all directions : to the West, repopulating Western Europe (where a few human groups, like theBasque people, would have survived), to the North towards Poland, Germany, Finland and more, and to theEast towards Iran, Afghanistan and India (from where we inherit the Vedas). It could be that Gobekli Tepe(in present day Turkey, dated to 10000 BP or even earlier) was one of, or the first temple/city to be built bythe Proto-Indo-Europeans (Schoch, 2013) as it fits genetic and linguistic evidence (Bouckaert and al, 2012).

    Soma has long been paralleled with the Haoma of Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism is considered bymodern scholars to have lived between 3800 and 2600 years ago, but classical writers like Plutarch, Diogenesor Pliny (citing Eudoxus and Aristotle), who lived around 2400 years ago, considered Zoroaster to have died6000 years before Plato (Jenny Rose, Zoroastrianism : an introduction). It is strange to think these scholarswould have made such a huge mistake in dating despite living only a few centuries after the present datingof Zoroastrianism. I therefore prefer to assume Zoroastrianism to be 8000-85000 years old, which wouldcoincide with the diaspora of the PIEs out of their refuge. Zoroastrianism may be contemporaneous withthe Vedas (which Frawley dates around 8000 or even 8500 years ago (Frawley, 2000)). In that view, Indianswould have indeed been the originators of the later Vedas. The Vedic people may have actually been orcoexisted with the Harappan culture as Frawley argues (1991).

    In India, fly agaric (which in my view should be considered the original soma of the PIEs, together perhaps

    with Psilocybe Cubensis, which would possibly be of Western European import) would have become less andless available, forcing the appearance of substitutes : cannabis, ephedra, nelumbo nucifera, etc.... Meditativepractices would have also been developed as substitutes to Soma, or more generally to recreate the mindof the Paleolithic people. According to McKenna and Wilson, there was indeed a need to reconnect to themind of the Goddess, as the link to it was fading as agricultural societies (more masculine in nature thanhunter-gatherer societies) developed :

    In the absence of a partnership community and with the loss of the psychoactive plants that catalyzeand maintain partnership, nostalgia for paradise appears quite naturally in a dominator society. The aban-donment of the original catalyst for the emergence of self- reflection and language, the Stropharia cubensispsilocybin-containing mushroom, has been a process with four distinct stages. Each stage represents a fur-ther dilution of awareness of the power and the numinous meaning resident in the mystery. The first stepaway from the symbiosis of the human-fungal partnership that characterized the early pastoral societies wasthe introduction of other psychoactive plant substitutes for the original mushroom. This psycho-activity can

    range from being equal in the depths of its profundity to the Stropharia cubensis psilocybin intoxication, asin the case with the classical hallucinogens of the New World tropics, to being relatively trivial. Examplesof the latter are the use of Ephedra, a stimulant, and fermented honey as Soma substitutes. (McKenna,1992)

    In the millenia that succeeded, shamanic spirituality and its myths continued to be transmitted (at leastpartly) until they ended up in some of the major religions of today (Wasson, 1986): such as Christianity(Allegro (2009), Bennett (2010), and others...) or Buddhism (Crowley, 1996). It is awe-inspiring to thinkour modern day spirituality traces some of its elements back into prehistory. Soma is such an element, butapart from a few religious schools, the use of entheogens has been abandoned by major religions. Not onlyhave they been abandoned, their use has sometimes been condemned or became a taboo.

    The impact of hallucinogens in the diet has been more than psychological; hallucinogenic plants mayhave been the catalysts for everything about us that distinguishes us from other higher primates, for allthe mental functions that we associate with humanness. Our society more than others will find this theory

    difficult to accept, because we have made pharmacologically obtained ecstasy a taboo. Like sexuality, alteredstates of consciousness are taboo because they are consciously or unconsciously sensed to be entwined withthe mysteries of our origin-with where we came from and how we got to be the way we are. Such experiencesdissolve boundaries and threaten the order of the reigning patriarchy and the domination of society by theunreflecting expression of ego. (McKenna, 1992)

    26

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    32/36

    4 Conclusion

    I would like to present what I consider to be an interesting thought. As McKenna points out, there seemsto be a link between psychedelics and humanness. I believe this link can be seen etymologically between thewords human, aum (the eternal sound of the universe in Vedic philosophy) and soma. Brown asserted thatthe word human came from the Sanskrit words aum and Manu. The syllable -man can be seen today in

    words such as manual, or manifest. In that sense, human would mean being a manifestation of the eternalsound of the universe (which is in fact reflected in Hinduism today under the metaphysical equation Atman= Brahman, ie. the totality and the self are one and the same). As I pointed out earlier Haoma could be amore ancestral word than Soma. Whats more hom is the word for Haoma in Old and Present-day Persian(according to the wikipedia article on Haoma). Could it be that Haoma came from the root aum or ohm? That Soma came from S-Aum-A, with S perhaps having to do with the fact that Indo-Aryan languagesare Satem languages? Could it be that our word for human comes from a time when PIEs studied soundand developed language under the influence of psychedelics?

    Whatever the case may be, there is enough evidence to show psychedelics had an important part inhuman pre-history. The ongoing pharmacratic inquisition, which persecutes psychedelic users worldwide(Arthur, 2000), is very paradoxical considering our roots (Ott, 1976). Nevertheless, science and medicine(which corroborate the beliefs of the ancestors that, rightfully used, these substances could be beneficial)

    may be the doorway to a more rational and less dogmatic relationship to mind-altering plants and fungi.

    In writing this paper, I wanted to explore how entheogens could have played a role in the appearance ofculture. I think it is obvious they had a central role, what is not obvious is my narrative. There are manyifs in this essay, enough to take the narrative I built with a pinch of salt. But even if this narrative is notabsolutely true and could never hope to be, I trust it has the merit of shining some light on the commonpast of the indo-europeans and their relationship to nature. I loved the process of research for this essay forI plunged in my favorite part of human history : the Upper Paleolithic. A time when humans were deeplyconnected to nature and yet were fully human. A time when humans hadnt yet built fictional frontiersand still considered themselves as part of the same family (which we are as genetics shows). Just like humansnow, they must not have been perfect, for sure, and we should not indulge too much in portraying them asideal people (which I have sometimes been tempted to do). Nevertheless, I reckon it would not hurt us toget some inspiration from them. I know I was inspired, perhaps you were too. Thats all I could hope for.

    27

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    33/36

    Works Cited

    Aaronson, Bernard Seymour., Humphry Osmond, and Stanley Krippner. "The Effects of Psychedelic

    Experience on Language Functioning."Psychedelics; the Uses and Implications of

    Hallucinogenic Drugs. Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1970. N. pag. Print.

    Abraham, Ralph. "The Paleolithic Birth of Geometric Thinking."Ralph-abraham.org. N.p., 2011. Web.

    2014.

    Allegro, John Marco. The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross: A Study of the Nature and Origins of

    Christianity within the Fertility Cults of the Ancient Near East. S.l.: Gnostic Media Research

    & Pub., 2009. Print.

    Arthur, James.Mushrooms and Mankind: The Impact of Mushrooms on Human Consciousness and

    Religion. Escondido, CA: Book Tree, 2000. Print.

    Bakshi, G. D. Shaman: Roots of the Rig Veda. Varanasi: Pilgrims Pub., 2006. Print.

    Balter, M. "LINGUISTICS: Early Date for the Birth of Indo-European Languages." Science302.5650

    (2003): 1490a-491. Web.

    Bennett, Chris. Cannabis and the Soma Solution. Waterville, Or.: TrineDay, 2010. Print.

    Bennett, J. G. "The Hyperborean Origin of the Indo-European Culture." Systematics(1962): n. pag.

    Web. 2014. .

    Bouckaert, R., P. Lemey, M. Dunn, S. J. Greenhill, A. V. Alekseyenko, A. J. Drummond, R. D. Gray,

    M. A. Suchard, and Q. D. Atkinson. "Mapping the Origins and Expansion of the Indo-

    European Language Family." Science337.6097 (2012): 957-60. Web.

    Brough, John. "Soma and Amanita Muscaria."Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies

    34.02 (1971): 331-62. Web.

    Brown, Harold Dean. "Sanskrit Language: The Most Ancient, Scientific, Spiritual." Youtube.com.

    ThinkingAllowed, 2003. Web.

    Cohen, Julie. "Study Examines 13,000-year-old Nanodiamonds from Multiple Locations across Three

    Continents."Physorg.com. N.p., 27 Aug. 2014. Web. 24 Dec. 2014.

    Crowley, Mike. "When the Gods Drank Urine."Fortean Studies3 (1996): n. pag. Web. .

    Doniger, Wendy. The Hindus: An Alternative History. New York: Penguin, 2009. Print.

    Eliade, Mircea, and Willard R. Trask. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. New York: Bollingen

    Foundation; Distributed by Pantheon, 1964. Print.

    Elias, Scott A. "Beringian Paleoecology: Results from the 1997 Workshop." Quaternary Science

    Reviews20.1-3 (2001): 7-13. Web. 2014.

    Falk, Harry. "Decent Drugs for Decent People : Further Thoughts on the Nature of Soma." Orientalia

    Suecana51-52 (2002): 141-55. Web.

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    34/36

    Falk, Harry. "Soma I and II."Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies52.01 (1989): 77.

    Web.

    Feeney, Kevin. "Revisiting Wasson's Soma: Exploring the Effects of Preparation on the Chemistry of

    Amanita Muscaria."Journal of Psychoactive Drugs42.4 (2010): 499-506. Web.

    Flattery, David Stophlet, and Martin Schwartz.Haoma and Harmaline: The Botanical Identity of theIndo-Iranian Sacred Hallucinogen "soma" and Its Legacy in Religion, Language, and

    Middle-Eastern Folklore. Berkeley: U of California, 1989. Print.

    Frawley, David.Astrology of the Seers: A Guide to Vedic/Hindu Astrology. Twin Lakes, WI: Lotus,

    2000. Print.

    Frawley, David. Gods, Sages, and Kings: Vedic Secrets of Ancient Civilization. Salt Lake City, UT:

    Passage, 1991. Print.

    Freedman, Adam H., Ilan Gronau, Rena M. Schweizer, Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo, Eunjung Han, Pedro

    M. Silva, Marco Galaverni, Zhenxin Fan, Peter Marx, Belen Lorente-Galdos, Holly Beale,

    Oscar Ramirez, Farhad Hormozdiari, Can Alkan, Carles Vil, Kevin Squire, Eli Geffen,

    Josip Kusak, Adam R. Boyko, Heidi G. Parker, Clarence Lee, Vasisht Tadigotla, Adam

    Siepel, Carlos D. Bustamante, Timothy T. Harkins, Stanley F. Nelson, Elaine A. Ostrander,

    Tomas Marques-Bonet, Robert K. Wayne, and John Novembre. "Genome Sequencing

    Highlights the Dynamic Early History of Dogs." Ed. Leif Andersson.PLoS Genetics10.1

    (2014): n. pag. Web.

    Froese, T., A. Woodward, and T. Ikegami. "Turing Instabilities in Biology, Culture, and Consciousness?

    On the Enactive Origins of Symbolic Material Culture."Adaptive Behavior21.3 (2013):

    199-214. Web.

    Fu, Qiaomei, and Heng Li. "Genome Sequence of a 45,000-year-old Modern Human from Western

    Siberia."Nature514 (2014): 445-49. Web.

    Geml, J., G. A. Laursen, K. O'neill, H. C. Nusbaum, and D. L. Taylor. "Beringian Origins and Cryptic

    Speciation Events in the Fly Agaric (Amanita Muscaria)."Molecular Ecology15.1 (2006):

    225-39. Web. 2014.

    Gershevitch, Ilya. "An Iranists View of the Soma Controversy."Mmorial Jean De Menasce. Louvain:

    n.p., 1974. 45-75. Print.

    Gray, R. D., Q. D. Atkinson, and S. J. Greenhill. "Language Evolution and Human History: What a

    Difference a Date Makes."Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological

    Sciences366.1567 (2011): 1090-100. Web.

    Hapgood, Charles H.Earth's Shifting Crust; a Key to Some Basic Problems of Earth Science. New

    York: Pantheon, 1958. Print.

    Hopkins, Edward Washburn. "The Dog in the Rig-Veda." The American Journal of Philology15.2

    (1894): 154-63. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Web.

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    35/36

    Hromada, Daniel D. "Report concerning Biotopic Co-occurrence of Peganum Harmala and Phalaris

    Aquatica Plants."Kyberia.sk. N.p., 2012. Web. 30 Dec. 2014.

    Iyengar, R. N. "Comets and Meteoritic Showers in the Rigveda and Their Significance."Indian Journal

    of History of Science45.1 (2010): 1-32. Web.

    Jacobson, Esther. The Deer Goddess of Ancient Siberia: A Study in the Ecology of Belief. Leiden: E.J.Brill, 1993. Print.

    Jay, Mike.Blue Tide: The Search for Soma. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 1999. Print.

    "JOURNEY OF MANKIND - The Peopling of the World."Bradshawfoundation.com. N.p., n.d. Web.

    Dec. 2014.

    Kuokkanen, Rauna. "Indigenous Women in Traditional Economies: The Case of Smi Reindeer

    Herding." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society34.3 (2009): 499-504. Web.

    Lehner, Ernst, and Johanna Lehner.Folklore and Symbolism of Flowers, Plants, and Trees: With over

    200 Rare and Unusual Floral Designs and Illustrations. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications,

    2003. Print.

    Mahdihassan, S. "The Vedic Gods Agni, Indra and Soma as Interrelated: A Study of Soma."Indian

    Journal of History of Science26.1 (1991): 11-15. Print.

    Mallory, J. P.In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth: With 175

    Illustrations. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2001. Print.

    McKenna, Terence K. "Alien Dreamtime."Erowid.org. N.p., 1999. Web.

    McKenna, Terence K.Food of the Gods: The Search for the Original Tree of Knowledge: A Radical

    History of Plants, Drugs, and Human Evolution. New York: Bantam, 1992. Print.

    Merlin, M. D. "Archaeological Evidence for the Tradition of Psychoactive Plant Use in the Old World."

    Economic Botany57.3 (2003): 295-323. Web.

    Muller, Jean-Claude. "Early Stages of Language Comparison from Sassetti to Sir William Jones (1786)."

    Kratylos31.1 (1986): n. pag. Web.

    Nogus-Bravo, David, Jess Rodrguez, Joaqun Hortal, Persaram Batra, and Miguel B. Arajo.

    "Climate Change, Humans, and the Extinction of the Woolly Mammoth." Ed. Anthony

    Barnosky.PLoS Biology6.4 (2008): E79. Web.

    Oppenheimer, Clive.Eruptions That Shook the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2011. Print.

    Ott, Jonathan. "Psycho-Mycological Studies Of AmanitaFrom Ancient Sacrament To Modern

    Phobia."Journal of Psychoactive Drugs8.1 (1976): 27-35. Web.

    Pagel, M., Q. D. Atkinson, A. S. Calude, and A. Meade. "Ultraconserved Words Point to Deep

    Language Ancestry across Eurasia."Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    110.21 (2013): 8471-476. Web.

    Panshin, Cory. "The Paleolithic Indo-Europeans."Panshin.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 2014.

  • 8/9/2019 The evolution of the Indo-Europeans in the Upper Paleolithic, through the "Eye" of Soma

    36/36

    Petaev, M. I., S. Huang, S. B. Jacobsen, and A. Zindler. "Large Pt Anomaly in the Greenland Ice Core

    Points to a Cataclysm at the Onset of Younger Dryas."Proceedings of the National Academy

    of Sciences110.32 (2013): 12917-2920. Web.

    Riedlinger, Thomas J. "Wasson's Alternative Candidates for Soma."Journal of Psychoactive Drugs25.2

    (1993): 149-56. Web.

    Rose, Jenny.Zoroastrianism: An Introduction. London: I.B. Tauris, 2011. Print.

    Ruck, Carl A.p. "The Offerings from the Hyperboreans."Journal of Ethnopharmacology8.2 (1983):

    177-207. Web.

    Schoch, Robert M. "Gbekli Tepe and the Origins of Civilization."Edge Science15 (2013): 4-14.

    Society for Scientific Exploration. Web.

    Sheldrake, Rupert. The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. New York:

    Times, 1988. Print.

    Sigerist, Henry Ernest.A History of Medicine: II, Early Greek, Hindu, and Persian Medicine. New

    York: Oxford UP, 1987. Print.

    Slattery, Diana. "The Noetic Connection: Synaesthesia, Psychedelics, and Language."Digital Creativity

    16.2 (2005): 122-28. Web.

    Spess, David. Soma: The Divine Hallucinogen. Rochester, VT: Park Street, 2000. Print.

    Staal, Frits. "How a Psychoactive Substance Becomes a Ritual : The Case of Soma." Social Research

    68.3 (2001): 745-78. Web.

    Teeter, Donald E. Amanita Muscaria: Herb of Immortality. N.p.: n.p., 2007. Print.

    Tilak, Bal Gangadhar. The Arctic Home in the Vedas: Being Also a New Key to the Interpretation of

    Many Vedic Texts and Legends. Poona City: Kesari, 1903. Print.

    Tupper, Kenneth W. "Entheogens and Existential Intelligence: The Use of Plant Teachers as Cognitive

    Tools." Canadian Journal of Education27.4 (2002): 499-516. Web. 2014.

    Vartaka, Padmakara Vishu. The Scientific Dating of the Rmyaa & the Vedas. Pune: Veda Vidnyana

    Mandala, 1999. Print.

    Wasson, R. Gordon.Persephone's Quest: Entheogens and the Origins of Religion. New Haven: Yale

    UP, 1986. Print.

    Wasson, Robert Gordon. Soma: Divine Mushroom of Immortality. New York: Harcourt Brace

    Jovanovich, 1971. Print.

    Williams, Richard J. "Soma in Indian Religion : Entheogens as Religious Sacraments."Rwilliams.us.

    N.p., 2009. Web. 2014.

    Wilson, Peter Lamborn.Ploughing the Clouds: The Search for Irish Soma. San Francisco, CA: City

    Lights, 1999. Print.

    Worsley, T. R., and Y. Herman. "Episodic Ice-Free Arctic Ocean in Pliocene and Pleistocene Time: