the future framework for disaster risk reduction guide to the future framework for disaster risk...
Post on 09-Apr-2018
Embed Size (px)
The future framework for disaster risk reductionA guide for decision-makersJune 2014
The preparation of this guide was coordinated by JanKellett and the document was edited by Jan Kellett and TomMitchell. Contributions to modules sections were made by AdityaBahadur, Lindsey Jones, Amy Kirbyshire, Emma Lovell, VirginieLeMasson, Katie Peters, Emily Wilkinson, Kashmala Kakakhel and Maartenvan Aalst. Additional support was provided by Orla Martin. Copy-editing was undertaken by DavidWilson. Design was by the authors in collaboration with policy communicationscompanySoapbox.
This document is an output of the Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN), implemented by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
CDKN is a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS) for the benefit of developing countries. However, the views expressed and the information contained in the document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or CDKN. Neither are they necessarily endorsed by DFID, DGIS or the entities managing the delivery of the CDKN project, which can accept no responsibility or liability for such views, for the completeness or accuracy of theinformation or for any reliance placed on them.
Readers are encouraged to reproduce material from this guide for their own publications, as long as these are not sold commercially. As copyright holders, ODI and CDKN request due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication.
Overseas Development Institute and Climate and Development Knowledge Network, 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (CC BY-NC 3.0).
Cancun Adaptation Framework
Climate change adaptation
Climate and Development KnowledgeNetwork
Civil society organisation
UK Department for International Development
Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation
Disaster risk management
Disaster risk reduction
Gross domestic product
Hyogo Framework for Action
Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
Millennium Development Goals
Multihazard Mitigation Council
Official development assistance
Overseas Development Institute
Sustainable Development Goals
United Nations Department of Economic andSocial Affairs
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
United Nations Population Fund
Vulnerability and capacity assessment
Acronyms and abbreviations
This document is intended as a living guide a beta version. Future editions of this document are already planned, with new and updated sections. The production team welcomes comments and corrections, ideas and recommendations, that can improve those future editions.
iv Report title Chapter Title 1
Table of contents Introduction: a future framework for disaster riskreduction
This guide to the future framework for disaster risk reduction (DRR) is intended for decision-makers, particularly those in government responsible for contributing to the new agreement.
The guide is organised into a set of modules, each representing important aspects of the successor to the existing Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA). By presenting evidence in the form of data, facts and summary messages, the modules highlight what should be covered by a new agreement.
There are seven modules:
Making the case The architecture Financing Vulnerability and inclusion Climate change Conflict and fragility Stakeholders and leadership.
This document is intended as a living guide a beta version. Not only does the production team welcome comments, corrections, ideas and recommendations, we also plan to add modules in the future based on demand and how the discussion unfolds. A module on transparency and accountability and one on the interface between a future framework for DRR and the SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs) are already planned for afuture edition.
Context2015 is a crucial year for promoting efforts to reduce disaster risk. Not only is it likely that we will see a successor to the HFA on DRR, we are also likely to see new SDGs, as well as a new climate change agreement. This represents a unique alignment of major international policy frameworks and an unparalleled opportunity to make inroads into reducing disaster risk globally, regionally andnationally.
Key to this is the growing realisation over the decade of the HFA that risk and development are inextricably linked. We cannot separate the creation, avoidance or reduction of disaster risk from development processes or those associated with economic growth. Risk management has to be enshrined as part of development, and only then can development progress be adequately protected and disaster risks minimised.
The road to SendaiThe new framework for DRR is due to be agreed in Sendai, Japan in March 2015, at the World Conference on Disaster RiskReduction.
To find out more about the process of agreeing a new frameworkfor DRR, and the current status of discussions, seetheUnitedNations Office for DRR website: www.unisdr.org/we/coordinate/hfa-post2015
iii Acronyms and abbreviations
1 Introduction: a future framework for disaster riskreduction
2 Summary of recommendations
5 How to use this guide
7 Making thecase Jan Kellett and Tom Mitchell
13 The architecture Jan Kellett and Tom Mitchell
19 Financing disaster risk reduction Jan Kellett
23 Vulnerability and inclusion Emma Lovell and Virginie le Masson
33 Climate change and disaster risk Lindsey Jones
37 Conflict and Fragility Katie Peters
41 Stakeholders and leadership Emily Wilkinson and Amy Kirbyshire
Summary of recommendations
The following set of recommendations are a collection from each of the modules of this guide. Individually they provide snapshots representing key considerations for the successor to the HFA (which we call HFA2 throughout this guide). Taken together
they represent an inter-connected articulation of the way a future framework can support the reductionof disaster risk through sustainable development.
2 Summary of recommendations 3
The financing of HFA2 must be aligned with the financing of the SDGs, with the larger part of the burden falling upon national governments, with a commitment to finance the integration of risk as part of delivering sustainable development. Specific elements of this commitment should be enshrined in HFA2 as follows:
National commitments to reduce risk must be underpinned by a targeted commitment to spend, especially at a local level.
These commitments must include both stand-alone financing of DRR as well as DRR embedded into broader development planning and expenditures.
HFA2 must prioritise the provision of very specific tools and guidance on financing for national governments.
International DRR financing must be targeted to those countries most in need and the activities that are most needed.
Donors must shift the burden of DRR to their development aid budgets.
The DRR community has to do much more to communicate the many incentives for investing in DRR, focusing first on the need to integrate risk concerns into development.
FINANCING DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
HFA2 needs to incorporate activities and outcomes that are based on context-specific analysis of the different needs, vulnerabilities, expectations and existing capacities of all population groups. The contribution and participation of these groups remain largely isolated from government, private sector and multi-stakeholder decision-making in DRR, making it essential that these aspects are considered in the successor to the HFA.
DRR practices must promote and monitor activities and outcomes that are based on context-specific analysis of the differential needs, vulnerabilities, expectations and existing capacities of all groups.
HFA2 must advocate for DRR practices that reduce peoples vulnerability to shocks and stresses, by promoting human rights, fostering community participation, valuing local and indigenous knowledge and ensuring equitable access to assets and resources.
DRR practices should also acknowledge and strengthen peoples capacities, draw upon their self-identified and prioritised needs and empower socially marginalised groups to participate as active agents of change to prepare for and respond to disasters.
HFA2 must promote gender equality as well as social and cultural diversity as fundamental goals to be achieved in their own rights and as key aspects of resilience to disasters.
Governments must create an enabling environment for socially marginalised people and grassroots organisations to engage in and/or lead decision-making processes and DRR programme design.
The HFA2 monitoring process must incorporate a social vulnerability dimension in the design of the new set of indicators. Data collection, assessments and analysis should be disaggregated according not only to gender but also to other aspects of social vulnerability, where appropriate, including age, disability, ethnicity and socio-economic status.
VULNERABILITY AND INCLUSION
Making risk reductio