the future of interferonin myeloproliferative neoplasms · 2019. 3. 8. · ropeginterferon alfa- 2b...
TRANSCRIPT
THE FUTURE OF INTERFERON IN MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS Jean-Jacques KILADJIAN Saint-Louis Hospital, University of Paris Paris, France
EVIDENCE FOR SUPERIOR EFFICACY AND DISEASE MODIFICATION AFTER THREE YEARS OF PROSPECTIVE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TREATMENT OF POLYCYTHEMIA VERA PATIENTS WITH ROPEGINTERFERON ALFA-2B VS.
HYDROXYUREA/BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT
HEINZ GISSLINGER, CHRISTOPH KLADE, PENCHO GEORGIEV, DOROTA KROCHMALCZYK, LIANA GERCHEVA-KYUCHUKOVA, MIKLOS EGYED, VIKTOR ROSSIEV, PETR DULICEK, ARPAD ILLES, HALYNA PYLYPENKO, LYLIA SIVCHEVA, JIRI MAYER, VERA YABLOKOVA,
KURT KREJCY, BARBARA GROHMANN-IZAY, HANS C. HASSELBALCH, ROBERT KRALOVICS, AND JEAN-JACQUES KILADJIAN
ASH 2018
Month 24 Efficacy Analysis
up to 3.6 years Safety Analysis Month 12 Month 0
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b phase III development in PV: PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV Studies
Treatment-related adverse events in >10% of patients
Treatment-related AE Ropeg (n=95) n (%)
Control (n=76) n (%)
Thrombocytopenia 24 (25.3%) 25 (32.9%)
Leukopenia 21 (22.1%) 23 (30.3%)
Anaemia 10 (10.5%) 22 (28.9%)
Increased gamma-GT 11 (11.6%) 2 (2.6%)
Alanine aminotransferase increased 10 (10.5%) -
Platelet count decreased - 8 (10.5%)
Myalgia 10 (10.5%) 3 (3.9%)
% o
f res
pond
ers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
M3-A M6-A M9-A
M12-A
(EOT in
PR)
M15-A
(CO-M
3)
M18-A
(CO-M
6)
M21-A
(CO-M
9)
M24-A
(CO-M
12)
M27-A
(CO-M
15)
M30-A
(CO-M
18)
M33-A
(CO-M
21)
M36-A
(CO-M
24)
AOP2014ControlAOP2014 (stat. significant RR)Control (stat. significant RR)
18
39
45
62 61 62
72 7167
73 7571
21
70 6975
6669
5249
52
59 58
51
RR:0.84 RR:0.56 RR:0.66 RR:0.85 RR:0.94 RR:0.90 RR:1.37 RR:1.42 RR:1.31 RR:1.29 RR:1.31 RR:1.38
Complete hematologic response (CHR)
Study Month Responder/N Responder % Responder/N Responder % P-value RR [95% CI]
(AOP2014/Control)
Ropeg (N=95) Control (N=76)
MONTH 12 (EOT in PR) 59/95 62.1 57/76 75.0 0.1201 0.85 [0.70-1.04]
MONTH 24 67/95 70.5 33/67 49.3 0.0111 1.42 [1.08-1.87]
MONTH 36 67/95 70.5 38/74 51.4 0.0122 1.38 [1.07-1.79]
Full A
nalys
is Se
t
CHR + improvement in disease burden
Study Month Responder/N Responder % Responder/N Responder % P-value RR [95% CI]
(AOP2014/Control)
Ropeg (N=95) Control (N=76)
MONTH 12 (EOT in PR) 44/95 46.3 39/76 51.3 0.5245 0.91 [0.67-1.23]
MONTH 24 47/95 49.5 27/71 38.0 0.1832 1.27 [0.89-1.81]
MONTH 36 50/95 52.6 28/74 37.8 0.0437 1.42 [1.01-2.00]
% o
f re
sp
on
de
rs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
M3-A
M6-A
M9-A
M12-A
(EOT
in PR
)
M15-A
(CO-M
3)
M18-A
(CO-M
6)
M21-A
(CO-M
9)
M24-A
(CO-M
12)
M27-A
(CO-M
15)
M30-A
(CO-M
18)
M33-A
(CO-M
21)
M36-A
(CO-M
24)
AOP2014ControlAOP2014 (stat. significant RR)Control (stat. significant RR)
15
26
34
46 4946
5349
4552
5653
16
47 4551
4047 37 38
42
4639 38
RR:0.90 RR:0.55 RR:0.73 RR:0.91 RR:1.19 RR:0.97 RR:1.39 RR:1.27 RR:1.08 RR:1.16 RR:1.44 RR:1.42
Full A
nalys
is Se
t
% o
f res
pond
ers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
M3-A M6-A M9-A
M12-A
(EOT in
PR)
M15-A
(CO-M
3)
M18-A
(CO-M
6)
M21-A
(CO-M
9)
M24-A
(CO-M
12)
M27-A
(CO-M
15)
M30-A
(CO-M
18)
M33-A
(CO-M
21)
M36-A
(CO-M
24)
AOP2014ControlAOP2014 (stat. significant RR)Control (stat. significant RR)
26
44
50
68 66 66
57
51
42
33 3127
RR:0.44 RR:0.84 RR:1.12 RR:1.94 RR:1.98 RR:2.31
JAK2 (V617F) - Molecular response
Study Month Responder/N Responder % Responder/N Responder % P-value RR [95% CI]
(AOP2014/Control)
Ropeg (N=95) Control (N=76)
MONTH 12 (EOT in PR) 41/94 43.6 38/75 50.7 0.5001 0.84 [0.62-1.15]
MONTH 24 (LOCF) 64/94 68.1 25/75 33.3 0.0001 1.99 [1.40-2.84]
MONTH 36 (LOCF) 62/94 66.0 20/74 27.0 <0.0001 2.31 [1.56-3.42]
Molec
ular
resp
onse
at
asse
ssm
ent v
isits
- LOC
F im
puta
tion -
FAS
Conclusions
• Results from three years of treatment in this large, prospective, controlled trial in PV confirm the previously reported efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b
• Ropeg showed high and durable hematologic responses and symptom control with good tolerability
• Ropeg reduced not only JAK2V617F but also additional mutations and cytogenetic aberrations confirming disease modification capability of IFNa
• Ropeginterferon alfa-2b will provide a valuable and safe new long-term treatment option with features clearly distinct from other treatment modalities including HU
COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ROPEGINTERFERON ALFA-2B VS. HU IN POLYCYTHEMIA VERA
PATIENTS AGED BELOW OR ABOVE 60 YEARS: TWO-YEAR ANALYSIS FROM THE PROUD/CONTINUATION PHASE III TRIALS
Heinz Gisslinger, Christoph Klade, Pencho Georgiev,
Dorota Krochmalczyk, Liana Gercheva-Kyuchukova, Miklos Egyed, Viktor Rossiev, Petr Dulicek, Arpad Illes, Halyna Pylypenko, Lylia Sivcheva, Jiri Mayer, Vera Yablokova, Barbara Grohmann-Izay, Gabriele Maurer, Hans Hasselbalch,
Robert Kralovics and Jean-Jacques Kiladjian
1) Gisslinger et al. EHA 2017 2) Gisslinger et al. ASH 2016
Off-label IFNα as first-line therapy is primarily used in patients of younger age, partly because of the misconception that the risk-benefit ratio is not so favorable in elderly patients. Aim: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Ropeginterferon alfa-2b and HU in two age cohorts (<60 years and ≥60 years).
Background
Efficacy Results 24 Months – by age group
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b induced higher CHR rates compared to control, irrespective of age.
CHR CHR & improvement in disease burden
Maintenance of CHR Maintenance of CHR & improvement in
disease burden
*RR Ropeg/control [95% CI]: 2.82 [1.37-5.79]
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b induced higher maintenance rates of CHR compared to control, irrespective of age.
*P<0.001
Efficacy Results 24 Months – by age group
Molecular response (LOCF)
*RR Ropeg/control [95% CI]: 2.17 [1.38 to 3.42]
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b induced a higher molecular response compared to control, irrespective of age
*P<0.001
Efficacy Results 24 Months – by age group
Long-term Safety: up to 3.6 years of treatment; mean 2.7 years
• Comparable numbers of AEs and serious AEs in the treatment arms, irrespective of age. • Number of ADRs was comparable in the patients <60 years but a trend towards a lower number of ADRs
(serious and non-serious) was evident for Ropeginterferon alfa-2b vs. control in patients ≥60 ys
Ropeg Control <60 years
N=49 ≥60 years
N=46 <60 years
N=39 ≥60 years
N=37
Patients with AE 44 (89.8%) 43 (93.5%) 36 (92.3%) 34 (91.9%)
Patients with serious AE 3 (6.1%) 10 (21.7%) 4 (10.3%) 9 (24.3%)
Patients with adverse drug reaction (ADR) 38 (77.6%) 29 (63.0%) 29 (74.4%) 33 (89.2%)
Patients with serious ADR 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (10.8%)*
Patients with ≥ Grade 3 AE 10 (20.4%) 16 (34.8%) 10 (25.6%) 14 (37.8%)
*Acute Leukemia, Anemia, Leukopenia, Granulocytopenia
• A high CHR, symptom improvement and molecular response (JAK2V617F) as well as maintenance of response achieved by long-term treatment with Ropeginterferon alfa-2b was shown, with an advantage over HU independent of age
• Ropeginterferon alfa-2b was well tolerated in all age groups. The safety
analysis in patients ≥60 years showed a positive trend regarding less ADRs and less serious ADRs for Ropeginterferon alfa-2b vs. HU
• Ropeginterferon alfa-2b provides a valuable, efficacious and safe new
treatment option for PV patients of all ages, including those older than 60
Summary - Conclusion
IFN TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION
PVN1 study – peg-IFNα-2a discontinuation • Causes of peg-IFNα-2a discontinuation
• 38% for hematol. CR
• 27% for toxicity
Fatigue (n= 2) Depression (n= 1) Auto-antibodies (n=2) Thyroiditis (n= 1) Arthralgia (n= 1) Neutropenia (n= 1) Neuropathy gr. 2 (n= 1) LFTs elevation gr. 2 (n=1)
OUTCOME OF PATIENTS AFTER DISCONTINUATION?
Objectives • Single center study of outcome of MPN patients treated with
IFN after discontinuation (whichever the cause)
• Endpoints (competing risk) : • hematological relapse
• thrombosis
• hematological transformation
• EFS (thrombosis, transformation, death)
• Predictive factors
Results • Since 2000 in St-Louis hospital, 333 MPN patients
received IFNa
• 149 stops • 78 PV, 61 ET, 10 MF
• Reasons for stopping:
• Toxicity : 79 (53%)
• Prolonged CHR: 52 (35%)
• Median time on IFN : 28.3 months
• Last follow-up:
• 109 (73%) patients were in CHR for a median time after IFN discontinuation of 42 months [23-58]
• including 46 (42%) without cytoreductive therapy after 33 months [19-53]
Results
Impact of molecular response on clinical outcomes Influence of JAK2V617 allele burden on the predicted probability of
persistent complete hematological response without cytoreductive therapy
JAK2 End IFN (%)
Proba
bility
of CH
R
0 20 40 60 80 100
00.2
0.40.6
0.81.0
Kiladjian et al., ASH 2016
COMBINATION THERAPY WITH IFN
RUXOPEG, a Multi-Center Bayesian Phase 1/2 Adaptive Randomized Trial of the Combination of
Ruxolitinib and Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a in Patients with MPN-Associated Myelofibrosis
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02742324
Phase 1: a Bayesian dose finding study to assess the safety of the combination of different doses of ruxolitinib and peg-IFN alpha-2a Phase 2: a secondary randomized evaluation of the 2 optimal doses found in the first part of the study
Primary tolerance criterion: occurrence of dose limiting toxicity within 45 days
18 patients enrolled from Sept 2017 to Nov 2018
Analysis on the first 16 patients allowing for DLT assessment
RUXOPEG study design - phase 1
Ruxolitinib (started D1)
10 mg BID 15 mg BID 20 mg BID
Peg-IFN 45 mcg/w (started D15)
n= 3 n= 3 n= 3
Peg-IFN 90 mcg/w n= 3
Peg-IFN 135 mcg/w n= 3 n= 3
Phase 1 - Conclusion
No DLT was observed among the 18 enrolled patients
Starting Phase 2: a secondary randomized evaluation of the 2 optimal doses found in the first part of the study Ruxolitinib 15 mg BID + Peg-IFN 135 mcg/w Ruxolitinib 20 mg BID + Peg-IFN 135 mcg/w
Primary efficacy criterion: > 50% reduction in spleen length within 6 months
Will include up to a total of 42 patients (24 additional patients)
Mean: 9.7 5.0 4.7 4.0 5.0
0
5
10
15
20
M0 M3 M6 M9 M12Time
value
M0 M3 M6 M9 M12
05
1015
20
• Efficacy of the combination for reducing the spleen size
RUXOPEG study - phase 1 preliminary efficacy results Sp
leen
size
BCM
by
palp
atio
n (c
m)
Sple
en si
ze B
CM b
y pa
lpat
ion
(cm
) M0 M3 M6 M9 M12
M0 M3 M6 M9 M12
RUXOPEG study - phase 1 preliminary efficacy results
Mean: 74% 64% 46%
JAKV
617F
alle
le b
urde
n
JAKV
617F
alle
le b
urde
n
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
M0 M6 M12
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
M0 M6 M12
• Efficacy of the combination for reducing the MPN clone
Patient #110-002 5 mutations at baseline Dose level 1: Rux 10 mg BID Peg 45 mcg/w
80%
41% 38%
6% 2%
51%
19%
30%
0%
11%
JAK2V617F ASXL1 DNMT3A EZH2 TET2
M0 M12
• Efficacy of the combination for reducing the MPN clones
RUXOPEG study - phase 1 preliminary efficacy results
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
IL-8/CXCL8
0.01
0.1
1
10
CXCL1/GRO alpha
0.1
1
10
CCL2/MPC-1
Multiplex assay of 45 cytokines at different time points
Different Cytokine Profiles : screening/end of treatment (n=8 first patients )
• Efficacy of the combination for reducing cytokine levels
RUXOPEG study - phase 1 preliminary efficacy results
M0 M12 M0 M12 M0 M12
Marie-Hélène Schlageter
CD56Bright
CD56Dim
NK
Phenotype evolution during treatment
In CD3+ CD4+
In CD3+
Th1
Th17
Th2
Cytokine expression in T lymphocytes
Treg CD25high CD127-/low
Population of Treg
TCM Naïve
TEM TEMRA
Population of naïve and memory T lymphocytes
PD1+ CD4+
PD1+ CD4-
Checkpoint expression in T lymphocytes
pSTAT1Tyr pSTAT3Tyr pSTAT5Tyr
control STAT1tyr STAT1tyr IFN-a STAT1tyr IFN-y
STAT3tyr STAT3tyr IL-6
STAT5tyr STAT5tyr GM-CSF
control control
Activation of immune cells during treatment
• At baseline • After Rux alone • After Rux + Peg IFN • At 12 months
Ancillary study of immune cells
Claude Capron
• Efficacy of the combination for improving bone marrow histology RUXOPEG study - phase 1 preliminary efficacy results
M0 M12 UPN #110-009
Specific and Synergistic Targeting of JAK2V617F Cells by Interferon Alpha (IFN) and Arsenic (As2O3)
in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)
Nabih Maslah, Tracy Dagher, Valérie Edmond, Bruno Cassinat, Valérie Lallemand-Breitenbach, Emmanuelle Verger, Isabelle Plo,
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Jean-Luc Villeval, and Hugues de Thé
ASH 2018
KI JAK2VF / Ubi GFP donor
WT donor
recipient WT
9,5 Gy
BMT 5 weeks
IFN
As2O3 9,5 Gy
Relapse after treatment discontinuation
2ry BMT
Disease in transplanted mice ?
KI JAK2V617F loxP TG Ubi GFP
Preclinical model: Chimeric KI JAK2V617F / JAK2WT grafted model
Hematological response Molecular response
Arsenic increases the hematological response induced by IFN in blood and tissues
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
NT IFN IFN+ARS
Sple
en w
eigh
t (m
g)
4 independent experiments n-25-28 animals
ANOVA Dunnet test
*** ***
***
* 4 independent experiments N-14-19 animals
***
***
**
***
***
ns
***
*** ns
IFN+As2O3 in vivo treatment in chimeric KI JAK2V617F / JAK2WT mice: Improvement of Hematological response
0
25
50
75
100
Lin- LSK SLAM
Perc
ent o
f BM
GFP
+ ce
lls
4 independent experiments n-25-28 animals
ANOVA Dunnet test 1 out of 2 experiments n=3 animals
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
***
***
**
***
***
***
ns
***
***
Addition of Arsenic to Interferon eradicates JAK2V617F leukemic stem cells?
IFN+As2O3 in vivo treatment in chimeric KI JAK2V617F / JAK2WT mice: Improvement of Molecular response
*** ***
Chimeric recipient
JAK2V617F / WT
9.5 Gy
5 weeks
IFNα
As2O3
9.5 Gy
2ry BMT Disease in transplanted mice
?
Arsenic greatly increases the suppression of disease-initiating cells induced by IFN
* from hematocrit and allele burden. 4 independent experiments
n-12-15 animals ANOVA Dunnet test
0
20
40
60
80
100
NT IFN IFN+A2O3
Perc
ent o
f dis
ease
free
* se
cond
ary
mic
e (%
)
IFN+As2O3 in vivo treatment in chimeric KI JAK2V617F / JAK2WT mice: Eradication of disease-initiating cells in secondary transplants
Chimeric recipient
JAK2V617F / WT
9.5 Gy
5 weeks
IFN
As2O3
Disease relapse
9 weeks after treatment
discontinuation
Arsenic decreases the percentage of disease relapse observed after discontinuation of the IFN treatment
**
* from hematocrit and allele burden. 4 independent experiments
n-12-15 animals ANOVA Dunnet test
0
20
40
60
80
100
NT IFN IFN+A2O3
Rela
pse*
aft
er tr
eatm
ent
disc
ont!
nuat
ion
(%)
IFN+As2O3 in vivo treatment in chimeric KI JAK2V617F / JAK2WT mice: Lower risk of disease recurrence after treatment discontinuation
9 weeks
Conclusion