the future of vta light rail, presentation to spur san jose nov. 12, 2014
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was delivered to SPUR San Jose by Ying Smith, VTA Transportation Planning Manager. It covers not only the history and context of VTA's light rail system, but also some of the challenges it faces and solutions planned to make it faster and more appealing in the future.TRANSCRIPT
Future of
VTA Light Rail
SPUR Presentation 11/12/2014
Almaden
Opening: 1991
1.1 miles
2 stations
Guadalupe
Opening: 1987-1991
19.6 miles
29 stations
Light Rail System: Guadalupe & Almaden
Tasman West
Opening: 1999
8.1 miles
16 stations
Light Rail System: Tasman West
Light Rail System: Tasman East/Capitol
Tasman East/Capitol
Opening: 2001, 2004
8.1 miles
11 stations
Vasona
Opening: 2005
5.3 miles
8 stations
Light Rail System: Vasona
Light Rail System
Light Rail System Facts
Average Daily Riders: 35,000
Boardings per revenue hour: 78.8
On-Time Performance: 84.5%
Track Miles: 79.6
Stations: 62
Park and Ride Lots: 21
Parking Spaces: 6,469
Vehicles: 100
90
4
53
3
24
6
37
4 28
2
46
7
23
1
1,1
44
39
5 31
2 21
8
1,3
01
68
11
3
25
6
65
12
6
34
2
16
2 12
1
34
1
13
1
14
3
47
2
19
7
34
1
21
5
2,3
36
50
2
22
1
27
6
27
6
55
5
57
8
87
7
1,2
93
57
2
68
5
2,3
39
2,5
67
1,1
72
26
5
69
2
31
1
49
3
46
1
23
6
38
7
88
0
36
3
22
3
67
2 58
8
73
4
29
8
1,7
16
41
7
45
7 42
0
1,1
60
25
9 21
1
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ALU
M R
OC
K
MC
KEE
PEN
ITEN
CIA
CR
EEK
BER
RYE
SSA
HO
STET
TER
CR
OP
LEY
MO
NTA
GU
E
GR
EAT
MA
LL
I-8
80
CIS
CO
BA
YPO
INTE
MO
UN
TAIN
VIE
W
EVEL
YN
WH
ISM
AN
MID
DLE
FIEL
D
BA
YSH
OR
E N
ASA
MO
FFET
T P
AR
K
LOC
KH
EED
MA
RTI
N
BO
RR
EGA
S
CR
OSS
MA
N
FAIR
OA
KS
VIE
NN
A
REA
MW
OO
D
OLD
IRO
NSI
DES
GR
EAT
AM
ERIC
A
LIC
K M
ILL
CH
AM
PIO
N
TASM
AN
RIV
ER O
AK
S
OR
CH
AR
D
BO
NA
VEN
TUR
A
CO
MP
ON
ENT
KA
RIN
A C
OU
RT
MET
RO
AIR
PO
RT
GIS
H
CIV
IC C
ENTE
R
JAP
AN
TOW
N/A
YER
ST J
AM
ES
SAN
TA C
LAR
A
SAN
AN
TON
IO
CO
NV
ENTI
ON
CEN
TER
SAN
FER
NA
ND
O
DIR
IDO
N
RA
CE
FRU
ITD
ALE
BA
SCO
M
HA
MIL
TON
CA
MP
BEL
L
WIN
CH
ESTE
R
CD
M
VIR
GIN
IA
TAM
IEN
CU
RTN
ER
CA
PIT
OL
BR
AN
HA
M
OH
LON
E-C
HYN
OW
ETH
BLO
SSO
M H
ILL
SNEL
L
CO
TTLE
SAN
TA T
ERES
A
OA
KR
IDG
E
ALM
AD
EN
VTA Light Rail Ridership Standard (310 Daily Boardings)
FY2014 Ridership
Tasman East Tasman West North FirstDowntown San Jose Vasona Guadalupe Almaden
8
Peer Comparison – Boardings and Route Miles
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
VTA Salt Lake City Sacramento Denver Portland
LR
T R
ou
te M
ile
s
Ave
rag
e W
ee
kd
ay R
ide
rsh
ip
Average Weekday Boardings LRT Route Miles
1,0101,420 800 1,160Boardingsper Mile 460
Source: NTD 2010
Peer Comparison – Farebox Recovery Ratio
Source: NTD 2010
National Comparison of Light Rail and Heavy Rail systems
10
VTA Light Rail Facts
Light Rail Bus
1 Driver for up to 500 people (one 3-car train)
1 Driver for up to 90 people (one full articulated Bus)
368,000 mile between chargeable accidents
73,000 miles between chargeable accidents
$5.95 Cost per passenger Trip $6.75 Cost per passenger Trip
53 passenger trips per revenue hour 27 passenger trips per revenue hour
85% on-time performance 86% on-time performance
4.3 passenger concerns per 100,000 boardings
20.2 passenger concerns per 100,000 boardings
Onboard Bike Storage Offboard Bike Storage
Onboard wifi Wifi on limited Express routes
11
< 25
25 - 50
50 - 100
100 - 200
> 200
DestinationOrigin Both
Transit Competitive Factor
Source: Comprehensive Operations Analysis, land use data 2005
12
Single TrackSegments
Merge Points
Light Rail System: Constraints
At-gradeIntersections
Future Transit Connections
Existing Transit Connections
Downtown Transit Mall
13
2010 Light Rail Systems Analysis
14
• Project began in September 2008
• Light Rail Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Comprehensive evaluation of the existing light rail system -- focus on making the system as effective and efficient as possible
• Operations and capital improvements analyzed and tested
• Evaluation of the Light Rail system to handle projected passenger growth to the year 2018 and 2035
Project Background
15
2010 Study Goals
• Increase Ridership• Calculate changes in ridership vs. No Build
• Speed up the System• Compute differences in average operating speed
• Spend Money Wisely• Check whether proposed scenarios lead to improved farebox recovery ratio
• Be More Relevant to the Needs of the Valley• Review how specific ridership gains compare to Market Analysis
opportunities
Capital Improvements
Grade Separation of North First Street at Montague Expressway
Fencing on North First Street ROW
Pocket Track at Ohlone/Chynoweth
Hostetter Turnback Tracks
New Great America Station
SJSU Extension to 11th Street
Install ATP/S Guadalupe Hwy
Almaden Branch Double Track
Mountain View Double Track
Vasona Double Track – Diridon to Fruitdale
Vasona Double Track – Bascom to Campbell
16
Recommended Improvements
17
Recommended Operating Plan
18
Trip Key ImprovementsExisting
Travel Time
With LRT Efficiency
Project
Travel Time Savings
Estimateddrive time
2018
Ohlone/ Chynoweth to
Convention CenterAll Day Express Service 13 min 9 min
30% travel time
reduction13 min
Almadento
Santa Clara
No transfer required at Ohlone/Chynoweth
26 min 20 min 23% travel
time reduction
26 min
Milpitas (BART) to
Great America (49ers Stadium)
New direct connection, No transfer required at Tasman, Signal Timing
improvements
23 min 16 min30% Travel
time Reduction
17 min
Travel Times with LRT Efficiency Projects
19
Express• Opened Oct 4th 2010 • Increased Ridership (490 per
weekday)• Wifi a big attractor
• Operates 13 minutes after local
• Travel time savings – 4 minutes
• No capital costs
• +$560,000 annual op. costs
Post Study Progress
27%
29%
25%
64%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
WI-FI
Faster Service
Very Important
Somewhat Important
• 52% say availability of Wi-Fi is very/somewhat important in their decision to
use the Express service
• 93% say the faster trip/schedule is very/somewhat important in their decision
to use the Express Service
• 16% started riding VTA light rail because express service was added
• 42% changed from using the regular service to only using the express
• In Summer 2011 VTA added Wifi to all trains
Light Rail Express Passenger Feedback
21
Santa Clara Pocket Track
Pocket Track is operationally complete
22
Mountain View Double Track
Construction to be completed before the end of 2015
23
Levi’s Stadium Service
Levi’s Stadium Service
• Average 8,000-9,000 Boardings on each game day
24
Future of
Light Rail
25
Near-Term Focus: it is all about speed
• VTA has established "increasing ridership" as one of its top five 2014 priorities
• Land use density continues to intensify along the light rail corridors
• VTA is becoming an urban light rail system where demand will increase along with traffic congestion levels along the light rail corridor
• In the future light rail will play a greater role in meeting the changing needs of Santa Clara Valley
• The system needs more flexibility to respond to different ridership demands
• Timing is a critical component when it comes the the potential success of capital improvements
Grade separate N. First St. and Montague
Double Track Vasona
Opportunities for Speed Improvements
26
Intersections onNorth First Street
Downtown San Jose
27
At-Grade Intersections
28
At-Grade Intersections
29
North First Street Improvements
Example of Gated and Fenced Light Rail Intersection
Expo Line Los Angeles
Current maximum speed – 35 mph
Maximum Speed after improvements – 45 mph• Improvements include fencing and gates at select intersections• Required by CPUC General Order 143-B• VTA will conduct an intersection-by-intersection analysis
Intersections onNorth First Street
30
Montague Grade Separation
Example: Great Mall Parkway and Montague
N. 1st and Montague• 32% of all trains delayed
• Average Delay of 44 seconds
• High automobile traffic volumes
Montague Grade Separation
Delay
(Sec/Veh)PM LOS
Existing 94.4 F
2040 215.7 F
31
Downtown San Jose
Downtown San Jose Transit Mall
• Maximum Speed 10mph (slowest system wide, see string chart below)
• Embedded track, hard to distinguish from sidewalk
• Multiple intersections and junctions
Downtown San Jose
32
Downtown San Jose
Bollard ExamplesEdmonton and Minnesota
Bollards can be used to create separation between tracks and sidewalk
33
Downtown San Jose
Curb Alternatives Phoenix
• Separation can also be created with Curbs or other types of treatment
• Applications of New Technology
34
Vasona Corridor
Freight Rail TracksVTA Tracks
Track SchematicVasona Corridor Improvements
- Vasona Corridor has two single tracked segments which contribute to delays systemwide
- VTA tracks are adjacent to Freight Rail tracks throughout corridor
- Platforms only allow for two-car trains (rest of the system can accommodate three-car trains)
Vasona Double Track
Near-Term Future Considerations
Near-Term Projects (To be completed before BART to Berryessa opening)
Complete Mountain View Double tracking (currently on track to be completed before the end of 2015)
Update Transit Signal Priority throughout system (Scheduled to begin construction by mid 2015)
Implement a new service plan (to happen in conjunction with the Milpitas BART station opening)
Mid-Term Projects (VTA would like to start these soon, but no specific timeframe)
Fencing on North First street to increase maximum speeds
Speed improvements in Downtown San Jose
Long-Term Projects (The projects will take a significant amount of planning and engineering)
Grade separate Montague Expresswayand North 1st Street
Double Track the Vasona Line
36
What’s In The Far Horizon?
• Superbowl 50 at Levi’s Stadium early 2016
• BART to Berryessa Opening in 2017
• Being responsive to Santa Clara Valley job and population growth and the expanding needs of light rail passengers
• Improving service to meet the needs of future transit connections
• BART to Downtown San Jose
• High Speed Rail
37
Future of VTA Light Rail
Questions & Answers