the global actors and their relations part 2 copyright 2013 cengage learning
TRANSCRIPT
THE GLOBAL ACTORS AND THEIR
RELATIONS
PART 2
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
“Everybody has accepted by now that change is unavoidable. But that still implies that change is like death and taxes—it should be postponed as long as possible and no change would be vastly preferable. But in a period of upheaval, such as the one we are living in, change is the norm.”
Peter Drucker, management professor
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Marching for Change
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Chapter 4: Chapter 4: Rivalries and Rivalries and
Relations Among Relations Among the Great Powersthe Great Powers
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
“Great powers fear each other. They regard each other with suspicion, and they worry that war may be in the offing. They anticipate danger. There is little room for trust….”
John Mearsheimer, realist political scientist
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Choice and Consequence
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Long-cycle theory: Rise and fall of the leading global power
Hegemon: A single powerful state that exercises predominant influence over global actors
Hegemonic stability theory: Global dominance of a hegemon is necessary to provide the order required for international commerce and military security
Enduring rivalries among great powers
7
The Quest for World Leadership
The Evolution of Great Power Rivalry for World Leadership, 1495‒2025
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Might Makes Right
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The First World War
Causes• Global level: Structuralism
• State level: Nationalism
• Individual level: Rational Choice
Consequences
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Road to World War I
By the beginning of the 20th century, there was intense competition among European powers.
Triple Alliance• Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Italy
Triple entente• Britain, France, Russia
Serbian nationalists’ assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in July, 1914.
11
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
World War I: A Guide to the Major Players Alliance Powers:
Germany, Austria-Hungary
Ottoman Empire, Italy (until 1915)
Entente Powers:Great Britain, France, Russia,
United States, Italy (after 1915)
12
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
World War I Consequences Millions of deaths Three multi-ethnic empires collapsed—
Austrian-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman Creation of many new states in Europe Independence of Republic of Ireland Bolshevik overthrow in Russia Versailles Treaty and punishment of
Germany Rise of communism Strong anti-war sentiment in U.S. and
western Europe13
The Consequences of World War I
Territorial Changes in Europe Following World War I
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Second World War: A Guide to the Major Players
Axis Powers: Germany, Italy, Japan
Allied Powers:France, Great Britain,
Soviet Union, United States
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Second World War
CausesRoad to WarUsing Three Analytic Levels
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Causes of World War II
Domestic currents in Germany:• Treaty of Versailles provisions
inflame Germany
• Fascism and Nazi grip on Germany
• German irredentism International currents:• Global economic collapse
18
Proximate Causes on the Road to War
The political rise of Adolf Hitler and his political party, the Nazis
Inaction by France, Britain, Soviet Union appeasement
Japanese colonialismUS isolationism
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning
World War II Redraws theMap of Europe
20
World War II Redraws theMap of Europe
Underlying Causes of WW II at Three Analytic Levels
Global level: Structuralism• Multipolarity—the distribution of global
power to three or more major actors
• Political Economy—the intersection of politics and economics
State level: Nationalism• Collective psychological forces
• Irredentism
• Fascism
• Ideology
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Underlying Causes at Three Analytic Levels (continued)
State level: Nationalism• Collective psychological forces
• Irredentism—reclamation of lost territory
• Fascism—far-right ideology that promotes extreme nationalism
• Ideology—set of core philosophical beliefs
Individual level: Rational Choice
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Rise of Hitler and German Nationalism
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Consequences of World War II
Border changes in Europe System change: end to great-
power rivalries in Europe Iron curtain in eastern Europe Beginning of decolonization United Nations
25
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Consequences of World War II (continued) Yalta Conference: the 1945 summit
meeting of the Allied victors Bipolarity: condition in which power
is concentrated in two players, each serving as a “pole”
U.S.-Soviet rivalry the Cold War
26
Allies or New Rivals?
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Cold War
World War II changed the global system to one dominated by two superpowers.
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Causes and Evolutionary Course of the Cold War
Global Level: Realism• Power transition propels both states to top
of global power hierarchy
• Struggle for spheres of influence
State Level: Ideological incompatibility• Domino theory
Individual Level: Misperception• Mirror images—viewing an opponent as
one’s opposite29
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Key Events in the Evolution of the
U.S.–Soviet Relationship During the Cold War 1949‒1991
30
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Confrontation, 1947‒1962 Kennan’s “long telegram” Containment: a strategy to prevent
Soviet expansion Truman doctrine: declaration by
President Truman that US foreign policy supports people resisting subjugation by communists
Khrushchev pursued a policy of peaceful coexistence
Cuban missile crisis, 196231
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
From Coexistence to Détente, 1963‒1978
MAD: Mutual assured destruction Kennedy and tension reductions Détente: Relaxation of tensions
• Policy of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger
• Linkage—cooperation to rewards
• SALT talks
• Cultural exchanges, trade agreements
32
Easing Tensions: US-Soviet Détente
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
From Renewed Confrontation to Rapprochement, 1979‒1991
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, 1979 Carter Doctrine Reagan Doctrine Rapprochement –reconciliation, a
diplomatic policy to reestablish cordiality
34
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning
From Renewed Confrontation to Rapprochement, 1979‒1991 (continued) Gorbachev
Foreign policies: withdrawal from eastern Europe, Afghanistan, Cuba; INF, START, and CFE treaties
Domestic policies:• Glasnost—openness and political freedom
• Perestroika—economic restructuring
35
Contending Interpretations of the Causes of the Cold War’s End
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Consequences of the Cold War
End of communism “End of history” Emergence of U.S. hegemony More elusive security threats
• Rogue states
• Terrorism
37
The Post-Cold War
Unipolarity—refers to the concentration of power in a single preponderant state.
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
America’s Unipolar Moment
Caused by end of Cold War Soft power
• Intangible, versus hard power
Unilateralism—independence• Isolationism
• Hegemonic leadership
• Selective engagement
Imperial overstretch?
39
The Rise of the Rest? From Unipolarity to Multipolarity United States currently the
dominant military and political power
China, Japan, India, the European Union and possibly Russia are potential challengers for hegemon role
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The Rise of the Rest? From Unipolarity to Multipolarity Multipolar distributions of power
can lead to war Power transitions Uni-multipolar—a global system
with a dominant power, but key issues require multilateral cooperation
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
A Resurgent Russia?
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Looking Ahead: The Future of Great Power Relations
Many observers sense shifts in global distribution of power are underfoot.US still valuable as leader, politically and militarilyMore actors join the US at the top economically.
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Global Prosperity
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Transitions in Wealth and Economic Power?
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
A New Global Hegemon?
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
The US-China relationship could pursue polarization and rivalry or interdependence and cooperation
Concert—a cooperative agreement among great powers on managing the system
Multilateralism—a cooperative approach to manage shared problems
A New Global Hegemon?
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Questions for Discussion
1. In your opinion, can or should the U.S. attempt global leadership? What are your arguments?
2. Do relations with and among Middle Eastern nations dominate world politics today?
3. Who is likely to be the next hegemon? How will this affect the Middle East?
48
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Questions for Critical Thinking
1. In what ways did the causes of World War I differ from those of World War II?
2. In what ways is the individual level of analysis useful in explaining the outbreaks of the two world wars?
3. How does the global level of analysis explain the twentieth-century changes in the structure of the international system?
49
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Questions for Critical Thinking (continued)
4. What three individuals had the greatest impact on the international system in the twentieth century? Why?
5. What factors help explain the end of the Cold War?
6. What are potential major changes in the structure of the international system in the twenty-first century?
50
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning
Web Links The World War I Document Archive The Avalon Project—World War II Cold War Race for the Superbomb
51