the happy rainbow fun-time revision slide show
DESCRIPTION
THE HAPPY RAINBOW FUN-TIME REVISION SLIDE SHOW. BADDA-BING. 1 Bannister Matz DiCredico Gorman Malinchock Padilla Taskin. 2 Brunnquell Ross Dilatush Keswa McMullen Peltekis. PERIOD 1. 3 Godshall Aptekar Dziekonski Khosa McQuillen Sheung. 4 Mann Abrahamson Goldstein - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
THE HAPPY RAINBOW FUN-TIME REVISION SLIDE SHOW
BADDA-BING
PERIOD 1
1
Bannister
Matz
DiCredicoGorman
Malinchock
Padilla
Taskin
2Brunnquell
Ross
Dilatush
Keswa
McMullen
Peltekis
3
Godshall
Aptekar
Dziekonski
KhosaMcQuillen
Sheung
4
MannAbrahamson
Goldstein
KotheMulholland
Tarasiuk
PERIOD 2
1
Carlson
MillerGong
Lyon
Rosario
2
Goldstein
SinesiKirschner, J.McLaughlin-
McMannis
3Kirschner, A
WolfTalbot
Pannepacker
Schmidt
4
Kruse
Zingarini
Garven
Richards
Rothstein
PERIOD 6/7
1
ABRAMS
DEARDEN
ESPLIN
KOGAN
PECKVILLANTE
2
COHEN DIENSTMAN
FELS
KUIKENMcKESSEY
SINGH
3
DEVITT
KELLER
HARTLEYLEDBETTER
REDNOR
WANG
4
DURKINLAGUNTINAKIRKPATRICK
MANGANO
SELVAN
WONG
PERIOD 9
1
BALAJIMORRISONRABINOWITZ
BARRY
EICK
MICCIOLO
2
CAREY
NORDENRUBINO
CAMPBELL
FOOTE
O’BRIEN
3
COHEN
OLIVARI
STRESSCARDUCCI
MARQUES
PIETROWSKI
NORDVEIT
4
KANER
PRICEZAVODNICK
CREWMcLAUGHLIN
SOYKA
GREEN = GO FOR IT!Excellent Critical Writing With
Researched, Well-Reasoned Arguments
• Uses original ideas (doesn’t let the critic take the lead)
• Uses Text {PROOF} from the short story in their arguments. Expands and analyzes that {proof} often.
• Frames all quotes from critics.
• Uses present tense when criticizing literature.
Yellow = Slow Down and Revise
Unbalanced, Unproven Arguments With Possible Faulty Reasoning. • Allows the critics to lead at times.
• Needs more detailed Text {PROOF} from the short story.
• Needs to cite author in detail.
• Needs to cite author and page number when paraphrasing.
• An alarming number of grammatical and formatting errors.
Red = Stop and Rethink. Inadequate Evidence and/or Failed
Reason• The critics take the lead. Article is
basically a summary of what critics think, rather than an original literary research article.
• Little to no actual textual {PROOF} to back up arguments.
• Appears rushed and unclear often.• Contains multiple typos and mechanical
errors.
CONCISE
• MAKE “TO BE” YOUR ENEMY.
• “IS” “ARE” “WAS” “WERE”
• WRITING BECOMES CLEARER
• LESS PASSIVE VOICE (PV)
CONCISE
The plot of the story is based
almost entirely on a group of
three young girls that enter the
store. [20 words]
CONCISE
The plot follows a group of
three young girls who
enter the store. [13 words]
[FRAMES]
• Make it clear if a critic or the author is writing the quote.
• Make you sound clearer and prepared for your reader.
[FRAMES]
[FRAMES]
[FRAMES]
[FRAMES]
[FRAMES]
[FRAMES]
TEXT {PROOF}• Increases your LOGOS
• Makes your argument more convincing
• Makes it clear that you KNOW the story and you KNOW your stuff!
TEXT {PROOF}
TEXT {PROOF}
TEXT {PROOF}
TEXT {PROOF}
TEXT {PROOF}
PARAPHRASEHelps your reader follow the important action. Cites the AUTHOR’s last name, not the critic’s.
Cites the PAGE NUMBER also.
EX: (London 7).
Keeps you from sounding pretentious
Effective use of Conciseness (C)
PARAPHRASE
PARAPHRASE
INTRO HOOKHelps your reader engage the material.
Uses a plausible connection. - Author quote- Metaphor- Comparison
TAKE 4 DAYS AND MAKE YOUR FINAL LITERARY RESEARCH ARTICLE
SPARKLE