the impact of climate change on the … · 2013-05-21 · • problem: supply < demand....
TRANSCRIPT
THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE VULNERABLE THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE VULNERABLE FISHERIES RESOURCE AND FISHERIES RESOURCE AND IITS COASTAL COMMUNITY IN TS COASTAL COMMUNITY IN
CILACAP REGENCY, INDONESIA:CILACAP REGENCY, INDONESIA:A SETA SET--UP FOR ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGYUP FOR ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY
Indah SuSIlowatIIndah SuSIlowatI
WaridinWaridin
RIZKY YULIANISARIZKY YULIANISA
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS & BUSINESSDIPONEGORO UNIVERSITY-INDONESIA
The paper is presented in IIFET 2012 : Visible Possibilities: The Economics of Sustainable Fisheries, Aquaculture
and Seafood Trade. Hyatt Regency Kilimanjaro, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: July 16-20, 2012.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Due to all of you, we are able to present our paper in Tanzania, 16 to 20 July 2012
(1)(1) Our deep appreciation are accorded to Our deep appreciation are accorded to the organizerthe organizer::-- special thanks to ANN SHRIVER & sponsorspecial thanks to ANN SHRIVER & sponsor
(2)(2) Thanks to my employer: Diponegoro University (Thanks to my employer: Diponegoro University (UNDIPUNDIP) ) & Higher Degree, Ministry of Education & Culture & Higher Degree, Ministry of Education & Culture ––the Gov ernment of Indonesiathe Gov ernment of Indonesia
Map of Study Map of Study AreaArea
Province: Central Java
INDONESIAINDONESIA
JAVA ISLANDJAVA ISLAND
Central Java Province
ACEHACEH
CilacapCilacap
INTODUCTIONINTODUCTION
• Significant role: fisheries sector to the coastal community; and agriculturesector to the inland/ coastal community, providing: - employment - food supply- research - other utilisation: energy, art, etc.
• Problem: Supply < Demand
The objective of this study
• To estimate the impact of climate change in Cilacap and its community; and
• To formulate the adaptation and mitigation strategy under the climate change condition.
Vulnerable, perhaps due to:
• Declining in Stock• Climate Change• Higher Demand higher
population• Environmental Quality deteriorated• Empowerment is less • Co-Management: among A-B-G-C ?
8
Table 1Sectoral Contribution to Gross Domestic ProductFor the Periode of 2006 to 2008 (in percent)
No. Sectors 2006 2007 2008
1 Foodcrops, Veterinary,Forestry, and Fisheries
13.0 13.8 14.7
2 Mines 11.0 11.2 11.4
3 Manufacturing Industry 27.5 27.0 27.2
4 Electricity, Gas, and Water Supply 0.9 0.9 0.8
5 Constructions 7.5 7.7 7.9
6 Trade, Hotel, and Restaurant 15.0 14.9 14.4
7 Transportation and Communication 6.9 6.7 6.2
8 Finance, Real Estate, and Other Service
8.1 7.7 7.4
9 Service 10.1 10.1 10.0
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: CBS Indonesia, 2008
Agriculture sector employs: about 30-40%
FOOD: SECURITY & SAFETY
3,383,5723,150,0572,895,6492,777,8112,469,9302,120,32251. Bali
9,028,8168,098,277nananana36. Banten
36,294,28034,765,99333,844,00232,503,99129,188,85225,516,99935. Jawa Timur
3,343,6513,121,0452,916,7792,913,0542,750,8132,489,36034. DI Yogyakarta
31,977,96831,223,25829,653,26628,520,64325,372,88921,877,13633. Jawa Tengah
38,965,44035,724,09339,206,78735,384,35227,453,52521,623,52932. Jawa Barat
8,860,3818,361,0799,112,6528,259,2666,503,4494,579,30331. DKI Jakarta
1,274,8481,040,207nananana20. Kepulauan Riau
1,043,456899,968nananana19. Kep. Bangka Belitung
7,116,1776,730,7516,657,7596,017,5734,624,7852,777,00818. Lampung
1,549,2731,455,5001,409,1171,179,122768,064519,31617. Bengkulu
6,782,3396,210,8007,207,5456,313,0744,629,8013,440,57316. Sumatera Selatan
2,635,9682,407,1662,369,9592,020,5681,445,9941,006,08415. Jambi
4,579,2193,907,7633,900,5343,303,9762,168,5351,641,54514. Riau
4,566,1264,248,5154,323,1704,000,2073,406,8162,793,19613. Sumatera Barat
12,450,91111,642,48811,114,66710,256,0278,360,8946,621,83112. Sumatera Utara
4,031,5893,929,2343,847,5833,416,1562,611,2712,008,59511. Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
218,868,791205,132,458194,754,808179,378,946147,490,298119,208,22900. Indonesia
200520001995199019801971Province
Number of Population by Province (n=33)
2006: 220 Million
2012: 250 million?CJ: 1/7
Conference ‘People and the Sea: New Directions in Coastal and Maritime Studies’; Amsterdam, 7-9 July 2005
Susilowati, Indah et al. (2005). The Coastal Community Empowerment Model of Micro-And-Small Scales Fish Processors: Pekalongan, Indonesia. Diponegoro University.
Demand:Demand:Fish Consumption per capita
22
38
30,5
39
28
9
3
10,5
1715
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Inggris
Australia
Pantai Gading
IndiaMeksiko
Thailand
Kamboja
LaosVietnam
Indonesia
kg/p
ers/
yrs
13
MY FOOD, WHY SO FRAGILE & LESS SAFETY....
PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION & CONSUMPTION
quantity, quality, diversification, safety
FOOD SECURITY vs FOOD SAFETYFOOD SECURITY vs FOOD SAFETY::
Gillnet is a kind of net to catch fish from surface- and mid-water.
Fish and swimming crab as well as shrimp will be caught from its gill onto the net.
FISHING GEARS
Cantrang is a kind of Payang net with modification likely similar to mini trawl.
Cantrang then has dual classification due to new creation made by fishers & it is conflicting in category.
Simulation: next 20 yearsInnundated area SLR, 16 Cm
Courtesy from Pekalongan Municipality Project on Climate Change (2012)
HIGH TIDE SEA WATER
SupplySupply
Fishing Fleets in Indonesia
0200400600800
10001200140016001800
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
year
num
ber
< 5 GT5 - 10 GT10 – 20 GT20 – 30 GT30 – 50 GT50 - 100 GT100 - 200 GT> 200 GT
Susilowati, Indah et al. (2005). The Coastal Community Empowerment Model of Micro-And-Small Scales Fish Processors: Pekalongan, Indonesia. Diponegoro University.
Production: by Treatment
Fish Marketing in Indonesia, 2007
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Marketing FreshDrying/ SaltingBoilingSmookingFreshsing
Materials and Method (Vulnerable)
Study Area:Cilacap
Data and Sampling:• Cross-sectional survey• Face-to-face interviews by the
trained enumerators • Instrument: semi-standardized
questionnaire and indepth interview • Respondents:
-Fishers (General): n=73a>affected by climate
change: n=43 (incl. Severed ones: n=26)
b> not affected: n=30-Consumer: n=100
• Sampling method: Multi-stage sampling
Tools of Analysis:- Economic Valuation- Descriptive statistics (C/R,
etc)
Related Study:- Empowerment of
Pekalongan Fisheries (Susilowati, et al. 2004; 2005; 2006)
- Food Security from components of production, distribution, and consumption (Achmad Suryana,2003)
24
Variables and Its Indicators
Variables Indicators of Variables Measurements Analyzing cost and benefit resulted from a production
Benefit and Cost Analysis Estimating Revenue, Variable Cost, Fixed Cost, Total Cost Profit : Revenue > Total Cost Loss : Revenue < Total Cost
Analysis of Production
1. Impact on Production Catch
Length of trip Spending
2. Impact on Distribution Physical distribution
Economic Valuation
3. Impact on Consumption Availability (local consumption) Affordability
Variability of Rainfall Density in Cilacap, 2006-2008
Variability of Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in Cilacap 2006-2008
The Results of Interview with Fishers Respondents (n=73)
No. Description Frequency Percentage 1. Knowledge about climate change
a) Yes b) No
52 21
71,2 28,8
2. Method to predict climate change a) Constellations b) Information from BMKG through radio,
television, etc. c) Information from TPI
28 15 30 0
38,4 20,5 41,1
0 3. Volume of Catch
a) Decrease b) No decrease / normal
68 5
93,2 6,8
4. Reason of decrease in catch a) Season/climate b) Increasing of fuel-price c) Others
61 3 9
83,6 4,1
12,3 5. Length of trip
a) Increase b) No increase / normal
67 6
91,8 8,2
6. Additional length of trip a) 0 days b) 1 days c) 2 days d) 3 days e) 4 days f) 7 days
6 4
16 26 16 5
8,2 5,5
21,9 35,6 21,9 6,8
7. Fuel Usage a) Increase b) No increase / normal
67 6
91,8 8,2
8. Food and Lodging Cost a) Increase b) No increase / normal
68 5
93,2 6,8
9. Increase in Maintenance Cost on Boat a) Increase b) No increase / normal
62 11
84,9 15,1
Cost and Revenue per Trip for FishersNo. Description n=73 Share TC
(percent) 1. Average of production (kg/trip) 3019,64 2. Length of trip (%)
Less than 15 days 15 to 30 days More than 30 days
12 56 5
16,4 76,7 6,8
3. Average Total Revenue 60.388.550 4. Average Total Cost 53.934.520 5. Average Fixed Cost
Depreciation of boat Depreciation of fishing gears Depreciation of engine Permit
5.871.230 4.012.810
81.990 776.440
1.000.000
10,89
7,44 0,15 1,44 1,85
6. Average Variable Cost Fuel Food & Lodging Maintenance Labor (ABK) Fees
48.063.290 12.507.530
8.338.360 7.760.270
11.421.990 87.470
89,11 23,19 15,46 14,39 21,18
0,16 7. Average Profit 6.454.030 8. R/C Ratio 1,12
Cost and Revenue per Month for Fish Traders
No. Description n=43 Share TC (percent)
1. Production (kg) 3.810,47 2. Total Revenue (Rp) 1114.313.953,49 3. Total Cost (Rp) 87.008.497,72 4. Fixed Cost (Rp) 514.033,37 0,59
5.
Variable Cost (Rp) Fish Fees Fresh-water Ice Labor Transportations Maintenance
86.494.464,35 76.209.302,33
6.000,00 245.988,37 106.952,72
6.959.302,33 2.511.395,35
455.523,26
99,41 87,59 0,01 0,28 0,12 8,00 2,88 0,52
6. Profit (Rp) 6.454.030 7. R/C Ratio 1,31
Logistic
FINDINGSFINDINGS• Cilacap is the most vulnerable area to climate
change in the southern part of Central Java• There is a decrease in catch and affected
severed losses to the respondents. • Fishers claimed had overspent in fuel, food &
lodging, repairs & maintenance and decreased in productivity.
• The availability and sustainability of fish-stock became questionable. The shocked of fisheries stock affected the chain of distribution and consumption and eventually weaken the food security and the fishers’quality of live in the region.
• 26 respondents suffered severe impacts on climate change and there were changes in direct use value, which consisted of change in productivity, change in food and lodging cost, and change in fuel cost,
• average change in productivity, food and lodging cost, and fuel cost of 26 respondents with severe impact on climate change were Rp1.5, Rp1.2 and Rp1.8 millions, while the average loss was Rp7.2 million per trip
• The adaptation and mitigation efforts(by A-B-G-C) is far from complete
STRATEGY
establishing a better extension program by:
(set up a new (set up a new extension institutionextension institutionwho responsible to underdo the who responsible to underdo the climate change mattersclimate change matters
(with main task on ADAPTATION & MITIGATION
MITIGATION• PHYSIC: such as, growing vegetation /
plants, such as: mangroves and other coastal vegetation, or structures that directly withstand sea level rise, hit a big wave and rob.
• NON-PHYSIC: need adjustments both physically and socio-economic and cultural life
CONCLUSIONS
• In short time, prescription on adaptation strategy to cope the climate change in the study area is indeed needed.
• Ecosystem-based fisheries management perhaps could be proposed as one of the way-outs to manage the vulnerable fisheries in Cilacap. This scheme seems will shed a light as a promising new paradigm of fisheries management in Indonesia.
BOROBUDUR Temple, Central Java-Indonesia
Karimunjawa Coral Reef, Central Java-Indonesia
Congratulate to the Organiser:
BIOGRAPHY OF THE AUTHORBIOGRAPHY OF THE AUTHOR INDAH SUSILOWATI: is a professor at the Faculty of Economics &
Business, Diponegoro University (UNDIP), Semarang–Indonesia. She was the head of Research Institute of UNDIP. She is a lecturer in Faculty of Economics and several postgraduate programs in UNDIP.She engaged in the Directorate of Higher Education Degree, Ministry of Education, the Government of Indonesia as reviewer for research works & accreditation of study program since 2005.
• Besides that she also provides consultancy services to several Local Governments and institutions in the region.
• She is a member of Asian Fisheries Society (AFS) and International Institute of Fisheries Economic and Trade (IIFET). She also collaborated with Worldfish to promote sustainable fisheries in the region. She has high commitment in advocating the greenenvironment, fisheries management and conflict resolution to thecompetent communities or stakeholders.
• She completed her Master and Ph.D. programs in resource economics from the Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Her dissertation (1998) entitled “Economics of Regulatory Compliance with Fisheries Regulation in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines”. She did thesis (1991) entitled :Welfare Impact of Improved Boat Modernisation (IBMS) in Pemalang Regency, Central Java, Indonesia”. Her B.Sc. was pursued in the Faculty of Economics, UNDIP where she is attached now.
• She had has presented and published papers in national and international forum. 3939
• REPORT ATTENDING IIFET 2012 CONFERENCETANZANIA, 16-20 July 2012
• INDAH SUSILOWATI, 49 years old, female, the academic staff in the Faculty of Economics, Diponegoro University-Semarang, INDONESIA. My main research interest is in Resource Economics with major research interest in Fisheries Economics.
• I highly appreciated to the anonymous reviewer to select my paper for oral presentation and the IIFET committee and organizer for awarding this paper with grant. I was granted by IIFET in formed of a USD$2000 (cheque from Oregon University), free conference registration and IIFET membership. The titled of my paper is “The Impact of Climate Change on the Vulnerable Fisheries Resource and Its Coastal Community in Cilacap Regency, Indonesia: A Set-up for Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy”. This paper was presented in oral presentation, July, 20, 2012 in Lake Victoria room, Hyatt Regency Kilimanjaro Hotel, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Session I: 08:45 to 10:15) under track of the economic impact of climate change on fisheries and aquaculture (Part II) with moderator of Florian Diekert. Please find in attachment is powerpoint of presentation.
• I express my special thanks to Ann Shriver, the Executive Director of International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade (IIFET) at secretariat of IIFET in Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, USA for her sustainable communication and support. My thanks to the organizer of IIFET 2012 conference, collegues from University of Dar Es Salam-Tanzania. My high appreciation for sponsor for providing me a funding mentioned above to attend the binneal IIFET conference 2012
• I attended plenary sessions, various parallel sessions, poster and game demonstration sessions during the conference of IIFET 2012. I had have learned much from the conference. Now, I am using the materials, method and experience gained from the conference to help the government- and the other stakeholders (academic-Business-Government-Community) in the fisheries development for Indonesia. Particularly, nowadays, theGovernment of Indonesia has a heavy homework to overcome the fisheries and trade problems. As an academic person and at the sametime as a researcher, I fully aware to share my contribution and expertise in solving this problem. Further, by attending this conference, I able to improve (refresh, update and re-charge) my experience and expertise on fisheries economics and trade. I got a marvellous chance to interact with the competent people and able to enlarge my networking around the world. Furthermore, I hope will be able to disseminate the materials and thoughts learned from the conference to the direct relevant stakeholders targets (such as: DoF officers who are pursuing in the postgraduate program in Diponegoro University, bachelor student as the young generation, fishing/ or agricultural communities who are under the supervision of DiponegoroUniversity in the social services program, fishers’s and/ or farmer’s society union, and the other relevant stakeholders).
• Report prepared byIndah Susilowati-The Faculty of Economics & Business. Diponegoro University - INDONESIAEmail: [email protected]