the impact of organizational innovation on the firm’s performance organizational innovation ??? ...
TRANSCRIPT
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Organizational Innovation ???
Invention VS Innovation (Schumpeter)Invention – an idea or model for a new product or system, not
yet entered the economic system.
Innovation – accomplished with commercial transaction involving
new product or system. It is a part of the economic system
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
SchumpeterInnovation – exploiting inventions/commercialization of new products, new processes and new forms of organization.
Chris Freeman (1987)Innovation Systems – product, process, market, managerial, organizational innovations (at the enterprise level) + labor market, social and institutional innovations (at the national level).
Malerba (9.06am GMT) - organizational innovation
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Lundvall’s Innovation
“Innovation really has something to do with TECHNOLOGY”
So… Organizational Changes ≠ Organizational
Innovation Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
‘ORGANIZATIONAL’ INNOVATION
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Adoption of
novelties into the
organization
(Damanpour,
1991; Sorensen
and Stuart, 2000)
Innovative changes customary / institutional manner relatively non-technological related more to organizational nature,
structure, arrangements, practices, beliefs,
rules and norms-rather than to product
and process trait. (e.g. Pettigrew and
Fenton, 2000) Koson Sapprasert
Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
The implementation of new or significant changes in
firm structure or management methods intended to
improve the firm’s use of knowledge, quality of goods
and services, or work flow’s efficiency. (Community
Innovation Surveys 4 / 2002 - 2004)
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
‘ORGANIZATIONAL’ INNOVATION
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Organizational routines - ways of doing things in the
firm (Nelson and Winter, 1982)
Obsolete routines (Dosi and Nelson, 1994)
Revolution / Organizational innovation is of crucial
Importance to the firm’s survival and competitiveness
(Anderson and Tushman, 1990; Romanelli and
Tushman, 1994)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Heterogeneity (e.g. Nelson and Winter, 1982)
Differences in connection with organizational
innovation (Downs, 1967; Levinthal and March,
1993; Hannan and Freeman, 1984)
Size does matter !!! (Schumpeter 1934, 1950)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Large firms, in general … More resources (e.g., financial) Innovate More
Organizational rigidity and Structural inertia (Downs,
1967) & Path Dependency (Levinthal and March 1993)
Resistance to Organizational changes
Benefit less !!
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Small firms, in general … Less resources & more constraints innovate less
Less complex structure & hierachy
Low inertial force (Hannan and Freeman, 1984) +
More flexible and adaptive
Benefit more !!
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
DATASET
Community Innovation Survey IV (2002 - 2004) from
Norway
Real micro data
Special Emphasis on Organizational innovation
4450 firms in both manufacturing and service industries
(About 1300 ‘organizational’ innovators)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
CIS IV questionnaire
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
METHODOLOGY & MODEL
Independent variables (Organizational innovation + other
control variables)
New knowledge management system (1)
Major change to the organization of work (2)
Significant change in the relation with other firms (3)
(1) | (2) | (3) = ORorg (0-1)
(1) + (2) + (3) = CNTorg (0-3)
CNTorg * Log(emp)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
METHODOLOGY & MODEL
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
METHODOLOGY & MODEL Dependent variables
Reduced time to respond to customer needs (1)
Improved quality of goods or services (2)
Reduced costs per unit output (3)
Reduced employee turnover (4)
Increased capacity (5)
Increased profitability (6)
(1) + (2) + (3) + (4) + (5) + (6) = CNTorgEF (0-18)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
METHODOLOGY & MODEL
Descriptive Statistics
Econometrics
Tobit Regression (Feldman, 1994; Laursen and
Salter, 2006)
Dosi (2007) OLS
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
NoORorg
(%)
ORGSYS
(%)
ORGSTR
(%)
ORGREL
(%)
CNTorg1
(%)
CNTorg2
(%)
CNTorg3
(%)
Manufacturing 1943 29.3 14.5 22.2 9.9 14.7 11.8 2.8
Services 1657 31 15.6 23.5 11.5 15.9 10.8 4.3
Others 850 23.5 14.2 16.1 6.8 12.7 8 2.8
size1 1628 20.6 10.4 14.9 7.4 10.6 7.9 2.1
size2 1132 27.5 13 20 8.1 16.1 9.2 2.2
size3 812 32.6 17.2 23.4 10.7 18.3 9.9 4.4
size4 878 42.4 23.3 34.2 15.9 17.5 18.6 6.3
Total 4450 28.8 14.9 21.5 9.9 14.8 10.7 3.4
Across Sectors both manufacturing, e.g., chemical products, electronic and communication equipments & services, e.g.,Post and telecommunication, computer related activities and R&D (ICT)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
No ORorg CNTorgEFCNTorg1 % CNTorg2 % CNTorg3 %
size1 1628 335 9.77 0.542778 11.96 0.664444 12.24 0.68size2 1132 311 10.09 0.560556 11.72 0.651111 12.29 0.682778size3 812 265 9.72 0.54 11.13 0.618333 13 0.722222size4 878 372 9.46 0.525556 11.31 0.628333 12.45 0.691667
Manu 1943 569 10.18 0.565556 11.54 0.641111 12.57 0.698333Service 1657 514 9.6 0.533333 11.71 0.650556 12.73 0.707222Others 850 200 9.14 0.507778 11.12 0.617778 11.71 0.650556
Total 4450 1283 9.78 0.543333 11.55 0.641667 12.51 0.695
CNTorg * Log(emp)
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
More big firms undertaking organizational innovation
These big firms do it more intensely
Most firms benefit from organizational innovation (cost
cutting, quality and satisfaction improvement, capacity
and profitability)
The more the organizational innovation, the better the
performance
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)
The Impact of Organizational Innovation on the firm’s performance
Size Effect on the impact ?? CNTorg * Log(emp) ???
Process Innovation ??
Different types of organizational innovation
Different effects on the firm’s performance
The impact on different industries
(manufacturing/services)
UNIVERSITETETI OSLO
Koson SapprasertCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK)