the influence of land based activities on the phytoplankton … · 2020. 8. 20. · classified...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012ISSN: 1735-6865
Received 4 Feb. 2011; Revised 19 July 2011; Accepted 26 July 2011
*Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]
151
The Influence of Land Based Activities on the Phytoplankton Communitiesof Shimoni-Vanga system, Kenya
Kiteresi, L.I.1, Okuku, E.O.1,2*, Mwangi, S. N.1,3, Ohowa, B.1, Wanjeri, V.O.1,Okumu, S. 1 and Mkono, M. 1
1 Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, P.O. Box 81651, Mombasa, Kenya2 Soil and Water Management Division, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Katholike Universiteit
Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium3 University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, G.P.O, Nairobi, Kenya
ABSTRACT: Phytoplankton communities play a significant role in the oceanic biological pump by formingthe base of the trophic structure. Increase in nutrients loading affects spatial and temporal distribution ofphytoplankton. This study examined the phytoplankton community structure and ecological indices in relationto nutrients dynamics in both estuarine and oceanic areas of Ramisi-Vanga systems along the Kenyan coast.Surface water samples were collected and analysed for nutrients (PO4
3--P, NO3--N and NH4
+-N) andphytoplankton abundance and community structure. This study reported very diverse phytoplanktoncommunity structure consisting of 88 taxa that were dominated by Chaetoceros sp., Coscinodiscus sp.,Nitzschia sp., Pseudo-nitzschia sp., Alexandrium sp., Protoperidium sp. and Prorocentrum sp that are amongthe potentially harmful algae. Diatoms were the most abundant taxa in Ramisi-Vanga system. Phytoplanktonabundance was found to be higher in the estuarine systems (1182.06±149.14 cells/L) as compared to theoceanic systems (551.99±166.70 cells/L) with high abundance observed in May for oceanic and estuarinesystems. Shannon Weiner’s species diversity index was greater than 2 in both oceanic and estuarine systems.Phytoplankton species’ abundance, composition and diversity were found to be influenced by the availabilityof NH4
+-N, NO3--N and PO4
3--P. Phytoplankton cell density was below 4000 cells/ L, thus, this study hasclassified Ramisi-Vanga system as an oligotrophic system implying that the current level of land basedactivities are not having significant impacts on the phytoplankton communities.
Key words:Phytoplankton, Ecological indices, Diatoms, Dinoflagellates, Nutrients, Flagellates
INTRODUCTIONPhytoplankton form the base of the marine food
chain and as such sustains diverse assemblages ofspecies ranging from microscopic zooplankton to largemarine mammals, seabirds and fish. With just aproportion of less than 1% of the earth’sphotosynthetic biomass, marine phytoplankton isresponsible for more than 45% of the planet’s annualnet primary production (Field et al., 1998). Indeed,phytoplankton is the fuel on which marine ecosystemsrun (Falkowski, 1994; Huppert et al., 2002) throughconversion of inorganic compounds to high- energyrich organic compounds (Lalli and Parsons, 1993).
Coastal environments differ in their physical andhydrographic properties such as depth, tidal mixing or
nutrient loadings and these differences can lead tocomplex phytoplankton dynamics (Cebrian and Valiela,1999). This is further complicated by the fact that waterquality in coastal areas worldwide is constantlychanging in response to rapidly increasing land basedactivities such as fertilizer application, land clearingand waste discharge. The increasing land basedactivities are affecting the spatial and taxonomicdistribution of this important oceanic biota as well astheir photosynthetic activity. The role of land basedactivities is both direct, through changes in oceanchemistry and indirect through climatically inducedalterations in the ocean’s physical circulation(Sarmiento et al., 1998).
-
152
Kiteresi L.I. et al.
Plankton are relatively short lived and are known torespond quickly to environmental perturbations suchas point source pollution (Osore, 2003). Zingone etal., (1995) also reported that phytoplankton periodicityis affected by the different sources of land-derivednutrients and by their dilution patterns. Thus,phytoplankton communities could be considered asrecurrent organized systems of organisms respondingin a related way to changes in the environment(Legendre and Legendre, 1998). The factors thatinfluence water quality of the Ramisi-Vanga systemsare natural processes such as rivers’ freshwater supplyand land based activities related to changes in landuse. In this paper, we briefly examine the controls ofwater chemistry on plankton community structure(mainly ecological indices) with an emphasis on theeffects of nutrients dynamics.
MATERIALS & METHODSThis study was conducted in Ramisi-Vanga system
located in the southern part of the Kenyan coast (Fig.1). Sampling was carried out in the estuarine andoceanic systems. Ramisi-Vanga system is a low-lyingcoastal plain submergent complex (below 30m contour)dominated by an extensive cover of mangrove forest,intertidal areas covered with sea grass beds and
shallow water lagoons harboring the coral reefs. Thesecritical systems are inter-linked through exchange ofwater, nutrients and carbon by the tidally controlledcirculation and river discharge (UNEP, 1998). In thisstudy, rivers Umba, Ramisi and Mwena were consideredas estuarine sites characterized by mangroveecosystems with freshwater input whereas Wasini,Kima, Sii Kiromo and Shimoni were considered oceanicsites. The sampling stations were River Umba (U1, U2and U3); R. Ramisi (R1, R2 and R3); R. Mwena (M1,M2, M3 and M4); Wasini (W1, W2 and W3); Kima(K1, K2 and K3), Sii Kiromo (Si1, Si2 and Si3) andShimoni (S1, S2 and S3) (Fig. 1). Samples were collectedfrom the stations in February, March, May, June andAugust in 2009. The choice of sampling periods wasbased on past study elsewhere that had shown thatundisturbed successions of phytoplankton communityapproach competitive exclusion and ecologicalequilibrium after approximately 35 to 60 days (Reynolds,1993). The mid-point of this range, 47.5 days is roughlyin agreement with the sampling intervals adopted.Although phytoplankton populations are not strictlyperiodic and may exhibit sudden collapses that we mayhave sometimes missed, this analogue does at leastprovide a rough justification for the samplingfrequency that was adopted for this study.
Fig. 1. Map showing the sampling stations
-
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012
153
Qualitative concentrated samples were collectedby filtering 20 liters of water (collected from just belowthe water surface) through a 20 µm phytoplankton net.For numerical analysis and species identification, 250ml of water samples were fixed in 5% Lugol’s solutionand kept undisturbed for three to four days till completesedimentation was achieved. The samples were furtherconcentrated to a volume of 50 ml and 1 ml (in triplicate)of the concentrated sample transferred into aSedgewick Rafter counting cell mounted on an invertedcompound microscope (Leica DMIL) and counting ofphytoplankton cells carried out in 100 squares of thecell chosen randomly. The results were expressed asthe number of cells per litre. The cell counts were usedto compute the cell density using the Striling, (1985)formula where the plankton density was estimated by:
N = (A * 1000 * C) / (V * F * L)
Where N = No of plankton cell per litre of originalwater,A = Total No. of plankton counted,C = Volume of final concentrate of the sample in ml;V = Volume of a field in mm3F = No. of fields countedL = Volume of original water in litre.
Estimation of the phytoplankton abundance wascarried out by sedimentation method (Utermöhl, 1958).Phytoplankton were identified using identification keysby Carmelo, (1997) and Botes, (2003). Wheneverpossible, identification was carried out to the specieslevel, although in some cases identification was onlypossible to genus level.
Nutrients samples were collected in acidprewashed polyethylene bottles from the surface andstored frozen prior to analysis. The methods describedby Parsons et al., (1984) and APHA, (1998) were usedto analyze ammonium (NH4
+-N), Nitrate + Nitrite {(NO3-
+ NO2-)-N} and orthophosphate (PO4
3--P) in the watersamples. All the chemicals used for analysis were ofanalytical grade and all the glassware were pre-washedin acid before use. PO4
3--P was determined using theascorbic acid method at 885 nm. NH4
+-N wasdetermined using the indophenol method at 630 nmafter at least six hours. Dissolved (NO3
- + NO2-)-N was
determined using cadmium reduction method andmeasured colorimetrically at 543 nm. Analytical qualitycheck was carried out by running procedural blanksalongside the samples as well as through the use of acheck standard.
Phytoplankton data were expressed as ecologicalindices to describe the phytoplankton communitystructure, eutrophication and water quality. The indices
used were species richness, abundance (cell density),Shannon Wiener’s diversity indices and Pielou’sevenness indices.
Species richness was taken as the total number oftaxa found in a sample. Shannon Wiener’s speciesdiversity index (Shannon, 1948) was calculated fromthe taxa and abundance (cells L-1) data for each site oneach sampling occasion. Shannon-Wiener’s speciesdiversity index formula used is described below
H = -Σ ni/N log2 ni/N;Where: ni is the number of individuals of the ithspeciesN is the total number of individuals.Pielou evenness index was calculated as follows;
E = H/ln S;
Where: H is the Shannon Wiener’s species diversityindex and S is the species richness (number of species).
Phytoplankton and nutrients data were categorizedas estuarine and oceanic and subjected to Shapiro Wilknormality test and Levene’s homogeneity of variancetest. Phytoplankton data that were not normallydistributed were log transformed to improve thenormality of the data. Kolmongorov-Smirnovgoodness of fit test for normality was not significantin both the estuarine and oceanic systems (p>0.05).This validated the phytoplankton data for parametricanalysis using one way ANOVA. Species abundance,diversity, richness and evenness indices that showedsignificant difference among sites and months werefurther subjected to post hoc comparisons usingTurkey Honest Significant Difference test. Pearson’scorrelation coefficient was used to test for anyrelationships between nutrients and phytoplanktonindices.
RESULTS & DISCUSSIONA total of 88 taxa were encountered in this study.
79 taxa were recorded in the estuaries whereas 75 taxawere present in the oceanic systems. Phytoplanktonwere grouped either as diatoms, dinoflagellates,flagellates or ‘others’ group (to include all the othergroups rather than the three major groups). Generally,the diatoms were the most diverse group with a totalof 45 taxa, followed by the dinoflagellates, ‘others’groups and flagellates with 20, 17 and 6 taxarespectively (Table 1). Temporally, the abundance ofdiatoms dominated the rest of the phytoplanktongroups throughout the study.
In the estuarine system, the diatoms were the mostabundant group with a mean ± SE of 1858.65±367.61
-
154
Phytoplankton Communities
Tabl
e 1. P
hyto
plan
kton
gen
era
for t
he p
hyto
plan
kton
gro
ups
Phyt
opla
nkto
n Ta
xa
Gro
ups
Estu
arin
e O
cean
ic
Dia
tom
s G
uirn
adia
sp, G
. del
icat
ula,
Lic
mop
hora
ehre
nber
gii,
Aste
rione
llops
isgra
cilus
, Tha
lass
ione
mas
p, T
. nitz
schi
oide
s, D
acty
lioso
lenp
huke
tens
is, D
acty
lioso
lens
p, M
elos
irasp
haer
ica,
Mel
osira
sp, A
ctin
opty
chus
splen
dens
, Fra
gila
riast
riatu
la,
Astr
erio
nella
sp, A
.ble
akel
eyi,
Aste
riom
phal
ussp
, Ba
cilla
riapa
xilif
era,
Bact
erias
trum
sp,
Blea
klel
eyan
otata
, Ce
ratu
alin
asp,
Cha
etoc
eros
sp, C
oscin
odisc
ussp
, Cyc
lote
llasp
, Cy
lindr
othe
cacl
oste
rium
, Cym
atos
irasp
, Dity
lum
bryt
wel
li,
Euca
mpi
asp,
E. z
oodi
acus
, Fra
gila
riops
issp
, Has
leas
p,
Hem
idisc
usco
rnife
rmis,
, La
uder
iasp
, Lep
tocy
lindr
ussp
, ,
Nav
icula
sp, N
itzsc
hias
p, N
. sig
ma,
N. c
loste
rium
, N. l
ongi
sima,
Odo
ntel
lasp
, Ple
uros
igm
asp,
P. d
irect
um,P
lankt
onie
llasp
, Pse
udo-
nitz
schi
asp,
Rhi
zoso
leni
asp,
Ste
phan
opyx
istur
ris, S
kele
tone
mas
p,
Stria
tella
unpu
ncta
ta, ,
Tha
lass
iosir
asp,
and
Thal
assio
thrix
sp.
Gui
rnad
iasp
, G.d
elic
atul
a,Li
cmop
hora
ehre
nber
gii,
Aste
rione
llops
isgr
acilu
s, Th
alas
sione
mas
p, T
. nitz
schi
oide
s, D
acty
lioso
lenp
huke
tens
is, D
acty
lioso
lensp
, Mel
osira
spha
eric
a, M
elosir
asp,
Act
inop
tych
ussp
lend
ens,
Astre
rione
llasp
, A
.ble
akel
eyi,
Aste
riom
phal
ussp
, Bac
illar
iapax
ilife
ra,
Bac
teria
strum
sp, B
acte
riosir
asp,
Bel
lero
chea
sp, B
leak
lele
yano
tata
, Ce
ratu
alin
asp,
Cha
etoc
eros
sp, C
oreth
rons
p, C
limoc
odiu
msp
, Co
scin
odisc
ussp
, Cyc
lote
llasp
, Cyl
indr
othe
cacl
oste
rium
, C
ymat
osira
sp, D
itylu
mbr
ytw
elli,
Euc
ampi
asp,
E. z
oodi
acus
, Fr
agila
riops
issp,
Has
leas
p, H
emid
iscu
scor
nife
rmis,
Hem
iaul
ussp
, La
uder
iasp
, Lep
tocy
lindr
ussp
, Lith
odes
miu
msp
, Nitz
schi
asp,
N.
sigm
a, N
. clo
steriu
m, N
. lon
gisi
ma,N
avic
ulas
p, O
dont
ellas
p,
Pleu
rosig
mas
p, P
. dire
ctum
, Pse
udo-
nitz
schi
asp,
St
riate
llaun
punc
tata
,Rhi
zoso
lenia
sp, S
kele
tone
mas
p,
Syne
drop
sissp
, Tha
lassio
sira s
p. a
ndTh
alas
siot
hrix
sp.
Din
ofla
gella
tes
Gon
yaul
axsp
,G. c
ysts
, Cer
atiu
msp
, C. f
urca
, C. f
usus
, C. t
richo
cero
s, Py
rocy
stisn
octil
uca,
Noc
tiluc
asci
ntill
ans,
Scrip
siella
troch
oide
a,Gam
bier
disc
usto
xicu
s, Al
exan
driu
msp
, A
mph
isol
enia
sp, A
zpei
tiasp
, Din
ophy
sissp
, Gyr
odin
ium
sp,
Gym
nodi
nium
sp, O
stre
opsi
ssp,
Oxy
toxu
msp
, Per
idin
ium
sp,
Poly
krik
ossp
, Pre
perid
iniu
msp
, Pro
roce
ntru
msp
andP
roto
perid
iniu
m
sp.
Gon
yaul
axsp
,G. c
ysts,
Cer
atium
sp, C
. fur
ca, C
. fus
us, C
. tri
choc
eros
, Pyr
ocys
tisno
ctilu
ca, N
octil
ucas
cint
illan
s, G
ambi
erdi
scus
toxi
cus,
Scrip
siel
latro
choi
dea,
Ale
xand
rium
sp,
Am
phiso
leni
asp,
Din
ophy
siss
p, G
onio
dom
asp,
Gym
nodi
nium
sp,
Gyr
odin
ium
sp, O
streo
psis
sp, O
xyto
xum
sp, P
erid
iniu
msp
, Po
lykr
ikos
sp, P
repe
ridin
ium
sp,
Pror
ocen
trum
span
dPro
tope
ridin
ium
sp
Flag
ella
tes
Chao
nofla
gelli
deas
p, E
ugle
na sp
, E. v
olvo
x, E
utre
ptie
llagy
mna
stica
, Fa
bric
apsa
sp, P
hacu
scon
tortu
s, Tr
ache
lom
onas
bacil
ifera
, T.
cylin
driic
aand
T. g
rand
is.
Chao
nofla
gelli
deas
p, E
utre
ptie
llagy
mna
stica
, Tr
ache
lom
onas
cylin
driic
aand
T. g
rand
is.
‘Oth
ers’
grou
p A
naba
ena
sp, C
hatto
nella
sp, C
hlor
ococ
cale
s-or
der,
Chlo
roph
ycea
sp,
Chry
soph
ycea
sp, C
occo
litho
phor
ids,
Cor
nuta
sp,
Cosm
ariu
mco
ntra
ctum
, Cya
noba
cter
ia sp
, Dic
tyoc
haoc
tona
ria,
Lyng
byas
p, O
scill
ator
iasp
, Ped
iastru
msp
, Pry
mne
sium
sp,
Scen
edes
mus
span
dVol
voca
le sp
.
Chlo
roph
ycea
sp, C
hrys
ophy
ceas
p, C
occo
litho
phor
ids ,
Cor
nuta
sp,
Cyn
obac
teria
sp, D
icty
ocha
octo
naria
, Osc
illato
riasp
, O
smot
hesc
ussp
, Pry
mne
sium
sp, S
cene
desm
ussp
andV
olvo
cale
sp
-
155
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012
cells/L. Diatoms showed a declining trend fromFebruary to March and an increase in cell density inMay (Fig. 2). The months of June and August had thehighest cell density of diatoms (>3000 cells/L). Ingeneral, the most abundant diatom taxa in the estuarinesystems were Coscinodiscus sp (149.95±24.07 cells/L)and Nitzschia sp (116.42 ± 83.155 cells/L). The monthof February had the highest cell densities of(Coscinodiscus sp, Thalassiosira sp andActinoptychus sp.). Coscinodiscus sp. was the mostabundant in May, June and August.
Generally, Coscinodiscus sp had the highestcell density (145.19±43.73 cells/L) in R. Umba. Pseudo-nitzschia sp. was the most abundant taxa in March.On the spatial scale, Pseudo-nitzschia sp. dominatedin rivers Ramisi and Mwena whereas Nitzchia sp.dominated in rivers Mwena and Umba. Diatomsdominance was observed over the studied period withpeak abundances in June and August and the lowestabundance in March (Fig. 2). The diatoms abundancessignificantly differed (F=11.85; p
-
156
Kiteresi L.I. et al.
while Oscillatoria sp. was most abundant in May, Juneand August. In general Oscillatoria sp. was also themost abundant taxa in river Umba (103.25 +34.35 SEcells/L). The abundance of ‘others’ in the estuarinesystem increased in May and June (Fig. 2). Theflagellates with the least species richness in this studywere the least in abundance in both estuarine andoceanic systems.
Generally, the oceanic system abundances werelower than in the estuarine system (Fig. 3). Leading inabundance in the oceanic system were Alexandriumsp (110.97±16.34 cells/L), Chaetoceros sp (102.34±28.63cells/L) and Protoperidinium sp (65.40±8.75 cells/L).Diatoms were still the most abundant group in theoceanic systems (Fig. 2) with Chaetoceros sp(102.34±28.63 cells/L), Pseudo-nitzchia sp (59.03±17.74cells/L) and Rhizosolenia sp (59.93±13.17 cells/L)dominating. Rhizosolenia sp were most abundant inSii Kiromo (66.08±10.59 cells/L) and Kima (53.65±22.11cells/L) whereas Chaetoceros sp dominated in Wasini(78.19±22.03 cells/L). Rhizosolenia sp. had highest celldensities in June (55.02±6.36 cells/L). Generally,Chaetoceros sp dominance was also observed inAugust (194.85±33.85 cells/L) and May (905.11±161.97cells/L) whereas Pseudo-niztschia sp dominated inFebruary (17.67±3.37 cells/L) and May (874.62±32.39cells/L).
The dinoflagellates abundance was lowest inFebruary (Fig. 2). Protoperidinium sp. was the mostabundant taxa among the dinoflagellates in Sii Kiromo(58.47±8.24 cells/L) and Shimoni (148.25±69.90 cells/
L). In general, Protoperidinium sp. also dominated inFebruary (14.93±3.74 cells/L) and May (407.77±87.65cells/L). Spatially, Wasini area had high abundance ofAlexandrium sp. (194.87±24.76 cells/L). Generally,Alexandrium sp also dominated in June (117.11±20.23cells/L) and August (131.61±23.83 cells/L). Thetemporal variation of dinoflagellates abundance weresignificant (F=23.01; p
-
157
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012
The correlation matr ix between PO43--P
concentrations and most phytoplankton groups (Table3) showed a negative correlation. A similar negativesignificant correlations were observed for NO3
--Nconcentrations and the four phytoplankton groups withsignificant correlations observed for dinoflagellates inriver Umba (r=-0.72; p
-
158
Phytoplankton Communities
Fig. 3. Phytoplankton groups, species abundance and richness numbers in both the estuarineand oceanic system of the Ramisi-Vanga area
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation between log transformed nutrients concentrations and the phytoplanktongroups in estuarine and oceanic systems
Phytoplankton Group PO43--P NO 3
--N NH 4+-N
Diatoms -0.27 -0.65** 0.36
Dinoflagella tes -0.19 -0.49* 0.28
Flagella tes -0.01 -0.71* 0.63*
Estuar ine
Others 0.08 -0.63** 0.62**
Diatoms 0.64** -0.48* 0.62**
Dinoflagella tes 0.53* -0.60** 0.59**
Flagella tes 0.61* -0.62* 0.82**
Oceanic
Others 0.36 -0.52* 0.18
* Significant (pÂ0.05)** Significant (pÂ0.01)
-
159
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012
0.600.65
0.700.750.800.85
0.900.951.00
Feb Mar May Jun Aug
Eve
nnes
s, E
Inde
x
1.501.701.902.102.302.502.702.903.103.303.50
Div
ersi
ty, H
Inde
x
Evenness, E Diversity, H
0.600.650.700.750.800.850.900.951.00
Ramisi Mwena Umba
Eve
nnes
s, e
inde
x
1.501.701.902.102.302.502.702.903.103.303.50
Div
ersi
ty, H
Inde
x
Evenness, E Diversity, H
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.800.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Feb May Jun Aug
Eve
nnes
s, E
Inde
x
1.501.701.902.102.302.502.702.903.103.303.50
Div
ersi
ty, H
Inde
x
Evenness, E Diversity, H
0.600.650.700.750.800.850.900.951.00
Wasini Kima SiiKiromo
Shimoni
Eve
nnes
s, E
Inde
x
1.501.701.902.102.302.502.702.903.103.303.50
Div
ersi
ty, H
Inde
x
Evenness, E Diversity, H
Fig. 4. Phytoplankton evenness E, and Shannon H, diversity indices in the Ramisi-Vanga system
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Am
ount
(mm
)
)
Fig. 5. Rainfall pattern in Msambweni District (source:District Crop Report December 2010)
x x xxx
-
160
Kiteresi L.I. et al.
Ceratium fusus, Prymnesium sp., Coscinodiscus sp.,Thalassiosira sp., Ceratualina sp., Rhizosolenia sp.,Chaetoceros sp., Pseudo-nitzschia sp., Cylindrothecasp., Guinardia sp., Nitzschia sp., Amphora sp., andFibrocapsa sp. Lyngbya sp. and Oscillatoria sp.
The diatoms dominance in abundance observedin this study could be supported by previous findingsof Zingone et al., (1995) that singled out diatoms asthe abundant taxa in nutrient rich coastal waters. Worthnoting is the high abundances that were observed inMay and June that is characterized by increasedprecipitation which corresponded to increasednutrients levels caused by increase in surface runoff.The dominance of diatoms in the two systems wasalso observed in February and March (that had lowprecipitation hence reduced nutrient influx) could beattributed to their ability to withstand a wide range ofnutrient concentrations. In contrast, dinoflagellates hadlower abundance than the diatoms as they are knownto have unimpressive nutrient-dependent uptake andgrowth that result in poor competitive abilities forinorganic macronutrients (Falkowski and Knoll, 2007)as compared to diatoms and other functionalphytoplankton groups. This also explains the temporalsignificant difference in abundance within this groupin relation to nutrients loading concentrations.
The high abundance of cyanobacteria in the ‘other’phytoplankton group in February and March (that arecharacterized by low precipitation and low nutrientslevels) could be attributed to their nitrogen fixing abilityduring N-limiting situations (Sumich and Morrissey,2004). Cyanobacteria with their characteristic smallsized cells have a competitive advantage undernutrient-limited conditions (Falkowski and Knoll, 2007)due to their high surface to volume ratio; they are alsoable to use organic forms of phosphorus (Labry et al.,2002) and can as such may flourish to form blooms.This further explains why high abundances ofcyanobacteria were observed in Ramisi and Mwenarivers that are known to have low influx of nutrients incomparison to Umba River. It can also be noted thatthe cyanobacteria proliferation was minimal in oceanicareas except in February as most marine cyanobacteriaare especially abundant in intertidal and estuarine areaswith a smaller role in oceanic waters (Sumich andMorrissey, 2004). Oscillatoria sp abundance duringthe months of high precipitation in Umba River and SiiKiromo could be attributed to their tolerance toincreased nutrients concentrations. The flagellates’low abundance in the two systems could be attributedto their motile nature and the ability to move to areaswith favourable conditions.
In general, the increase in phytoplankton groups’abundance corresponded to a decrease in the NO3
--N
concentrations in Ramisi-Vanga system. Findings byYajnik and Sharada, (2003) showed that NO3
--N uptakeby phytoplankton is severely reduced by the presenceof NH4
+-N. The month of May being the onset of therainy season, the high abundance in oceanicphytoplankton as compared to estuarine systems wasattributed to increased influx of nutrients and couldalso be attributed to river inputs that create a thin halinestratification which is favourable for phytoplanktonproduction (Chapelle, 1990). The early rains carry loadsof loose particulate matter which reduces the photiczone in the water column hence the slight reductionphytoplankton abundance in the estuarine system.
The species abundance, composition anddiversity of phytoplankton communities in this studycorresponded to nutr ients levels although thebiogeochemical functioning of this area is largelyunknown. Nutrient influx during the early rains in Mayled to increase in phytoplankton abundance in theoceanic systems which later reduced in June. Thedecrease in abundance in June was accompanied byan increase in diversity index, species richness andevenness index due to favourable conditions forproliferation of diverse phytoplankton taxa. The lowspecies richness in the oceanic system in comparisonto the estuarine system both temporally and spatiallymay have been controlled by abiotic and biotic factorsproviding equilibrium between accumulation and lossof species over time (Fischer, 1960). Species evennesswas lowest in River Ramisi which on the other handhad the highest species richness and abundance. Thismeant that a few taxa dominated the phytoplanktoncommunity in this estuarine system. The contrary wasobserved in River Mwena that could be an indicationof favorable environmental condition encouraging faircompetition among the phytoplankton communitiesleading to overlapping niches and efficient resourceutilization. In general, the species diversity indexrevealed good species equitability in Ramisi - Vangasystem that ranged from 2 to 3. Shimoni village whichis adjacent to ocean, receives runoffs and leachate fromland based activities thus increased nutrientsconcentrations unlike the other sites which are withinWasini channel that experience frequent dilution/mixingwith the nutrient depleted oceanic water. In the oceanicsystem, phytoplankton periodicity is affected by thedifferent sources of land-derived nutrients and by theirdilution patterns (Zingone et al., 1995). This enabledthe more tolerant species to highly proliferate inShimoni area as it has been reported elsewhere thatphytoplankton composition generally change withnutrient loadings and in response to pollutant levelsbecause of different nutrient needs and sensitivitiesto contaminants (U.S. EPA, 2000). High disturbances
-
161
Int. J. Environ. Res., 6(1):151-162, Winter 2012
can suppress or eliminate many members of thecommunity which in turn lowers the species richnessindex. The few species that will be favoured in suchspecies shift always thrive in high numbers and thiscould be the possible explanation for the observedhigh abundance that corresponded to low speciesrichness in this study.
According to the classification scheme proposedby Siokou-Frangou and Pagou, (2000); Pagou, (2000),the Ramisi-Vanga system with phytoplankton celldensities ranging only from 194.96 to 3919.6 cells/Lcould be classified as oliogotrophic. Oligotrophicsystems are defined by this scheme to be systems withphytoplankton cell densities less than 6000 cell/L.
CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, diatoms dominance was observed
in Ramisi-Vanga system. The wide distribution andhigh abundance of diatoms reported in this study isindicative of a conducive environment for active growthand survival of other forms of lives. The cleardominance of diatoms in the study areas, both inabundance and diversity also suggests the presenceof a clean environment. On the other hand, the presenceof bloom causative taxa in high abundance is a signalof potential blooms within the Ramisi- Vanga systemeven during periods of reduced nutrients input. Thesepotential HABs species serves in this study as an earlywarning on possible toxins contamination of seafoodfor human use. Ramisi-Vanga system has beenclassified in this study as an oligotrophic system andas such this study concludes that the currently levelof land based activities are not having adverse effectson the phytoplankton communities of this system.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTFunding for this work was provided through SEED
funds (Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute,KMFRI) and RAF 7008 Project (International AtomicEnergy Agency, IAEA). We are greatly indebted to theDirectors of these Institutions for supporting this work.We also appreciate the efforts of KMFRI staff thatassisted in field samples collection and analysis in oneway or the other. We acknowledge the efforts of theanonymous reviewer who tirelessly and promptlycritiqued this work.
REFERENCESAPHA, (1998). Standard method for the examination ofwater and waste-water. 20th (ed) Baillie, P. W. and Welsh, B.L. (1980). The Effect of tidal resuspension on the distributionof intertidal epipelic algae in an estuary. Estuarine and CoastalMarine Science, 10, 165-180.
Botes, L. (2003). Phytoplankton identification catalogue-saldanha bay, South Africa, April 2001. GloballastMonograph Series No. 7. IMO, London, 77pp.
Carmelo, R. T. (1997). Identifying Marine Phytoplankton.Academic Press, USA, 858pp.
Cebrian, J. and Valiela. I. (1999). Seasonal pattern inphytoplankton biomass in coastal ecosystems. Journal ofPlankton Research, 21 (3), 429-444.
Chapelle, A. (1990). Modélisation d’un écosystème marincôtier soumis à l’eutrophisation : la baie de Vilaine (sud-Bretagne). Etude du phytoplancton et du bilan en oxygène.Thèse Univ. Paris VI, 201 pp.
Falkowksi, P. G. (1994). The role of phytoplanktonphotosynthesis in global biogeochemical cycles.Photosynthesis Research, 39, 235-258.
Falkowski, P. G. and Knoll, A. H. (Eds). (2007). Evolutionof Primary Producers in the Sea. Elseiver. 431pp.
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T. and Smetacek, V. (1998).Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean PrimaryProduction. Science, 281, 200-206.
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T. andFalkowski, P. G. (1998). Primary production of thebiosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components,Science, 281, 237-240.
Fischer, A. G. (1960). Latitudinal variation in organicdiversity. Evolution, 14, 64-81.
Huppert, A., Blasius, B. and Stone, L. (2002). A Model ofPhytoplankton Blooms. The American Naturalist, 159, 156-171.
Labry, C., Herbland, A. and Delmas, D. (2002). The role ofphosphorus on planktonic production of the Gironde plumewaters in the Bay of Biscay. Journal of Plankton Research,24 (2), 97-117.
Lalli, C. M. and Parsons, T. R. (1993). BiologicalOceanography: An Introduction. Pergamon. UK, 301pp.
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology.2nd English edition. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam.
Osore, M. K. W., Fiers, F. and Daro, M. H. (2003). Copepodcomposition, abundance and diversity in Makupa Creek,Mombasa, Kenya. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine.Science, 2 (1), 65-73.
Pagou, K. (2000). Assessment of the trophic conditions inthe Inner Thermaikos Gulf. Technical Report for theMinistry of Environment, Planning and Public Works,NCMR, Athens. 11pp.
Parsons, T., Maita, Y. and Lally, C. (1984). A manual ofchemical and biological methods of seawater analysis.Pergamon Press, Oxford, 173 pp.
Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathematical ecology. Wiley, NewYork, 385p.
Reynolds, C. S. (1993). Scales of disturbances and their rolein plankton ecology. Hydrobiologia, 249, 157-171.
-
Phytoplankton Communities
162
Sarmiento, J. L., Hughes, T. M. C., Stouffer, R. J. andManabe, S. (1998). Simulated response of the ocean carboncycle to anthropogenic climate warming. Nature, 393, 245-249.
Shanon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication./Bell System Technology Journal, 27, 379-/423, 623-656.
Siokou-Frangou, I. and Pagou, K. (2000). Assessment of thetrophic conditions and ecological status in the InnerSaronikos Gulf. Technical Report for the Ministry ofEnvironment, Planning and Public Works, NCMR, Athens.43pp.
Stirling, H. P. (1985). Chemical and Biological methods ofwater analysis for Aquaculturists. Institute of Aquaculture,University of Stirling, Scotland FK94LA, 119pp.
Sumich, J. L. and Morrissey, J. F. (2004). Introduction tothe biology of marine life. 8th edition. Jones and BartlettPublishhers, 431pp.
Taylor, L. R., Kempton, R. A. and Woiwod, I. P. (1976).Diversity statistics and the log series model. Journal ofAnimal Ecology, 45, 255-272.
Trobajo, R. and Sullivan, M. J. (2010). Applied diatomsstudies in estuaries and Shallow Coastal Environments. InSmol, J. and Stoermer, E. (Eds), The Diatoms: Applicationsfor the Environmental Earth Sciences, Cambridge UniversityPress. 309-323pp.
U.S. EPA. (2000). Nutrient criteria technical guidance manualrivers and streams. U.S. EPA Report. EPA-822-B-00-002.
Underwood, G., Phillips, J. and Saunders, K. (1998).Distribution of estuarine benthic diatom species alongsalinity and nutrient gradients. European Journal ofPhycology, 33 (2), 173-183.
UNEP. (1998). Eastern Africa Atlas of Coastal Resources.1: Kenya. (EAF-14) UNEP, 119 pp.
Üthermöhl, H. (1958). Zur Vervollkommnung derquantitativen Phytoplankton Methodik. MitteilungInternationale Vereinigung fuer Theoretische undeAmgewandte Limnologie 9, 1-38. Washington D.C. 1213pp.
Yajnik, K. S. and Sharada, M. K. (2003) Ammoniuminhibition of nitrate uptake by phytoplankton: A new relationbased on similarity and hyperbolicity. Current Science, 85(8), 1180-1189.
Zhaohui, W. Z.; Jufeng-Chen, Y. and Yufeng, Y. N. (2006).Phytoplankton abundance, community structure andnutrients in cultural areas of Daya Bay, South China Sea.Journal of Marine Systems, 62, 85-94.
Zingone, A., Casotti, R., Alcala, M. R., Scardi, M. andMarino, D. (1995). St Martin’s Summer’: the case of anautumn phytoplankton bloom in the Gulf of Naples(Mediterranean Sea). Journal of Plankton Research, 17 (3),575-593.