the international journal of analytical and experimental...
TRANSCRIPT
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT OF SELECT TYRE COMPANIES IN
INDIA – AN ANALYSIS
R.BASKAR
Ph.D. Research Scholar in Commerce,
Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu-608 002, India.
E-mail:[email protected]
Dr. M.BHARATH, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor and Research Supervisor,
(On Deputation from Annamalai University), PG and Research Department of Commerce,
Thiru.Vi.Ka. Govt. Arts College, Thiruvarur – 3, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
E-mail: [email protected]
Mobile No.: +91 99652 – 82049
ABSTRACT
Liquidity is one of the most relevant factors to determine the investment decision of
the company’s shareholders. The term liquidity is to meet current obligations to face short
term financial problems. The present study based on secondary data and the data were
collected from the published annual reports and various research articles, newspapers etc. The
present period of study covered for ten years from 2008-2009 to 2017-2018. The researcher
has been used tools for analysis of Liquidity Ratios, Mean, Standard Deviation, Coefficient of
Variation and Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). A researcher has to analyze the
liquidity management of select Tyre companies in India. The liquidity position of MRF Tyre
Ltd, Balkrishna Industries Ltd. Apollo tyre Ltd. was satisfactory and the other rest of the
company was not satisfactory during the study period. At the same time, the cash position of
Good Year Ltd. was satisfactory level rest of the companies was not maintain the adequate
level of cash position at standard norms 0.50:1 time. Hence, during the study period 2016-
2017 to 2017-2018 the entire tyre companies to slightly down of the financial position. The
average collection period of Apollo tyre Ltd. was good performance other rest of the
companies to be not performing well.
KEYWORDS: Working Capital, Current Ratio, Liquid Ratio, Absolute liquid Ratio, Debtor
Turnover Ratio, Average Collection Period.
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:488
INTRODUCTION
Financial ratios are helpful indicators to measure a company’s financial performance
and to make a financial decision. The present of the study aims to analyze the liquidity
position of select tyre companies in India. Liquidity Management place on a vital role in the
development and profitability of the entire business. A company can meet its current
obligations within a year. The liquidity position of a company may be kept in deferent forms,
current assets for inventories, cash at the bank balance and current liability for sundry
creditors, bank overdraft. Cash balances in current account provide the highest degree of
liquidity a company can maintain liquidity position if it keeps the assets it helps to easy to
sell quickly within minimum transaction cost and loss in value. Liquidity and its management
determine to grate extern the growth and profitability of the company. The company to
having inadequate liquidity, a company was not performing normal day-to-day business
operations. Liquidity is the most important financial factor in determining whether a
company performs well or not and also it is helpful to consider working capital management
of a company. Liquidity for measuring company ability functions of current assets to current
liabilities. The importance of liquidity management is to determine the actual financial
strength and weakness of the firm and it is also determined the profit of the company. The
vital role of maintaining a working capital is most required for entire business day-to-day
activities and to ensure the nonstop working to meets its current obligations. In this study to
analyze the most important factor to determine both internal and external factors because
liquidity is directly linked to day-to-day business operation.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A number of studies have been made on an analysis of the liquidity management of
select tyre companies in India. A reference to these earlier studies will be relevant in the
conducts of frame the present study.
Researcher has shown earlier that liquidity management position to tyre companies in
India. Amalendu Nhunia (2010), Shweta Mehrotra (2013, Ajanthan. A (2013), Sunil M
(2014), Partha Ghosh (2014), Tanwar and Chowhan (2014), Balachandran. B (2015,
Ariful Hoque et al, (2015) in their studies have established this aspects.
Anil Soni (2012) examine the ‘working capital management with special reference to
Vardhman Textiles limited’ in this study based on secondary data and the data has been
collected from annual reports of the company. The period of five years from 2006- 07 to
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:489
2010-11 audited annual reports, its tools for used in ratio analysis and correlation. Therefore
current ratio of the firm maintaining is good way during the overall study period, at the same
time the firm also managing current assets. The quick ratio of the firm has down from during
the study period. There correlation shows that no relationship between liquidity and
profitability.
Dhevika , Latasri and Gayathri (2013) carried on ‘a study on financial performance
analysis of city union bank, in this study based on secondary data and the period was covered
for five years from 2007-08 to 2011-12 published annual reports respective bank. The study
to use in descriptive analysis and the result was found out the ratio analysis during the study
period. During the study period the financial performance was better and the city union bank
are able to maintain optimal level of cost position. The bank also faces the capital expenditure
and high level of working capital commitments.
Amalendu Bhunia and Sudeepta Das (2014) analyses ‘Liquidity position of private
sector textile companies in India – A case study’ the present study based on secondary data
and the was collected from CMIE prowess data base. The period of this study from 2008 to
2013 published annual reports, its tools for used analysis in the form of application of
descriptive statistics and liquidity ratios are to be used. In this point of view the statement of
result of profitability.
Vekateswarlu P and Krishna Reddy B (2015) in her article on ‘liquidity
management of select cement companies of Andhra Pradesh-a comparative study’ there are
six cement companies selected from Andhra Pradesh based on purposive sampling method.
The period this study for ten years from 2003-04 to 2012-13 and through a information
collected for secondary data from annual reports, journals, related other research papers. The
researcher was used to tools for financial ratios analysis and Motaal’s ultimate rank test.
During the study period the report conclude about current assets and current liabilities at the
similar rate and the working capital of the company is negative performance. At the same
time company was maintain good profits and good return on capital.
Pritesh C. Panchal (2016) investigated as ‘liquidity analysis of selected
infrastructure companies – a comparative study. In this study based on secondary data are
used and the period was selected for a five years from 2011 to 2015 published annual reports.
It is collected on the basis of availability of the data and the sample was selected as three
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:490
companies. The researcher was used tools for analysis like ratio analysis during the all the
study period. Hence, the liquidity position of the IRB is best better than Reliance
infrastructure Ltd and Japee infrastructure ltd. During the overall study period the IRB is
performance is good.
Research Gap
The researcher to refer valuable reviewed based on financial statement analysis in my
view no researcher cannot study about in this study area particularly liquidity management
for the Indian tyre companies period of 2007-08 to 2017-18. All the reviews mostly studied
other manufacturing companies, telecom sectors and banking sectors etc., it is this stud to
focus top seven Indian tyre companies to analyze one field of financial performance like
liquidity ratios.
Statement of the problem
Liquidity is the ability of a firm to meet its current financial obligation during the
short term period time and to maintain long term debt. It is one of the financial factors to
determining the actual financial position of all type of manufacturing companies and this
ratio helps to actual results of assets and liability position of the companies. In this study to
taken to know about liquidity position of select tyre companies in India. Because of the more
financial problem going on all manufacturing sector particularly the automobile industry. In
this way of tyre industry on the part of the automobile industry, a tyre is the main factor to
fulfil all types of automobile vehicles. It is the right time to analyze the main part of the
liquidity position of the select tyre companies in India.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The main objectives of the present study are:
1. To analysis the working capital performance of select tyre companies in India.
2. To examine the liquidity management of the select tyre companies in India.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sources of Data
The sources of secondary data will be used for the purpose of the study. The sources
of secondary data collected from the annual reports of select tyre companies from 2008-2009
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:491
to 2017-2018, published and unpublished research papers and dissertation, books, journals
articles, reports, related research papers, websites etc.
Selection of Sample
The present study deals with the working capital management and the liquidity
management of tyre companies in India. In this study was made an attempt to select the top
seven tyre manufacturing companies in India were listed in the BSE and the NSE based on
market capitalization.
Scope of the Study
The present study deals with the working capital management and the liquidity
management of tyre companies in India. To undertake the most relevant and important raw
material producer restricted to the above mentioned seven select tyre companies in India.
Period of the Study
The present study period covers a ten years from 2008-2009 to 2017-2018. The
analysis of variables to relating the working capital management select tyre companies in
India. In order to analyse the effect of working capital components on liquidity management
of tyre companies in India.
Tools for Analysis
The data collected will be analysed in a closely related operations according to the
nature of the information by using a various tools and techniques, both accounting tools of
liquidity ratios and statistical tools for mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and
compound annual growth rate (CAGR).
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The present study based on seven companies of the tyre industry in India that also
drawn from the companies listed in the BSE and NSE.
Analysis and Results
In order to study the liquidity position of select tyre companies, the researcher have
calculated Working Capital, Current Ratio, Liquid Ratio, Absolute Liquid Ratio and other
related ratios were calculated and depicted in the following tables:
Working capital
A calculation of the working capital is current assets mines current liabilities. The
following Table shows the working capital of select tyre companies in India.
Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:492
Table 1 Working Capital of Select Tyre Companies in India
(₹. in crore)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 801.21 546.15 580.58 148.79 330.02 161.99 96.95
2009-10 1309.58 702.36 525.81 22.78 277.81 151.84 108.03
2010-11 1753.02 992.15 791.76 245.82 148.23 226.26 136.25
2011-12 1654.87 512.22 -311.54 -218.52 -333.45 47.80 150.02
2012-13 2352.03 581.74 -57.98 -201.03 -430.17 37.48 199.63
2013-14 2714.89 -3442.55 -205.58 -120.18 -193.79 16.31 259.45
2014-15 3086.97 -3275.03 -71.03 -235.85 258.76 5.60 371.05
2015-16 3086.97 86.00 149.65 -107.58 254.10 38.98 371.05
2016-17 2711.27 103.40 279.36 -56.70 485.96 18.30 451.64
2017-18 3136.41 587.15 1805.25 -568.21 11.57 16.92 524.51
Mean 2260.72 -260.64 348.63 -109.07 80.90 72.15 266.86
SD 830.63 1654.53 626.46 226.08 306.27 77.86 153.34
CV% 36.74 -634.79 179.69 -207.28 378.56 107.92 57.46
CAGR% 14.62 0.73 12.01 0.00 -28.47 -20.22 96.95
Source: Computed from Annual Reports
Table 1 shows that working capital of MRF tyre Ltd. Was positive nature during the
study period. It is ranged from ₹. 801.21 crore to ₹. 3136.41crore. The results indicating SD
and CV is the moderate level deviation its mean value. A compound annual growth rate is
14.62 per cent. The working capital of Balkrishna industries Ltd. was negative nature during
the study period. It is ranged from ₹. 546.15 crore to ₹. 587.15 crore. The results indicating a
low level deviation its mean value. A compound annual growth rate is 0.73 per cent. A
working capital of Apollo tyre Ltd. Was positive nature during the study period but 2011-12
to 2014-15 the working capital range was negative performance. It is ranged from ₹. 580.58
crore to ₹. 1805.25 crore. The result of SD and CV is indicating a moderate level deviation its
mean value. The working capital of JK tyre & Industries Ltd. was negative trend during the
study period it’s ranged from ₹.148.79 crore to ₹. -568.21crore. The result of SD and CV is a
negative deviation from the mean value. There is no compound annual growth rate (CAGR).
The working capital of CEAT Ltd. was positive nature during the study period but during
2011-12 to 2013-14 is the negative performance. The working capital ranged from ₹. 330.02
crore to ₹. 11.57 crore. It is result of SD and CV is moderate level deviation from its mean
value. There is a negative growth of compound annual growth rate. The working capital of
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:493
TVS srichakra Ltd. was positive nature during the period. It is range from ₹. 161.99 crore to
₹.16.92 crore and the result of SD and CV is moderate level deviation its mean value. A
working capital performance of Good year Ltd. was Positive nature during the study period.
It is ranged from ₹. 96.95 crore to ₹. 524.51 crore and the result of SD and CV is indicating a
moderate level of deviation its mean value.
Liquidity Ratio
Liquidity ratio is to measure the company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations.
It consists of comparing the short-term debts to short-term resources available to pay those
debts. The liquidity of select tyre companies has been examined with the help of the
important of liquidity ratios and the results presented as follows:
Current Ratio
The current ratio is the ratio. Those assets easy to the way of convert cash within a
short period of time. The ratio is calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities.
The standard ratio of 2:1is considered as a measuring scale of the adequacy of current assets.
The following table is given by the current ratios of the select tyre companies in India.
Table 2 Current Ratio of Select Tyre Companies in India
(Times)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 2.36 7.45 2.26 1.20 1.67 4.20 1.46
2009-10 2.65 7.11 1.76 1.02 1.37 1.93 1.40
2010-11 2.26 5.15 1.77 1.20 1.14 1.89 1.41
2011-12 1.80 1.50 0.86 0.90 0.81 1.10 1.42
2012-13 2.01 1.67 0.97 0.91 0.76 1.08 1.50
2013-14 2.04 0.29 0.91 0.95 0.90 1.03 1.73
2014-15 2.07 0.38 0.97 0.91 1.17 1.01 2.33
2015-16 2.07 1.06 1.07 0.96 1.21 1.10 2.33
2016-17 1.61 1.06 1.10 0.98 1.36 1.03 2.28
2017-18 1.69 1.42 1.59 0.83 1.01 1.03 2.13
Mean 2.06 2.71 1.32 0.99 1.14 1.54 1.80
SD 0.32 2.76 0.48 0.12 0.28 1.00 0.42
CV% 15.34 101.96 36.51 12.42 24.92 65.05 23.12
Source: Computed annual reports
Table 2 shows that current ratio of MRF Ltd. was satisfactory during the study period.
The mean value of ratio was 2.06:1times and the result of SD and CV is indicting a low level
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:494
deviation its mean value. Liquidity ratio of the company was satisfactory. The current ratio of
Balkrishna Industries Ltd. was satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is
2.71:1 times and result of SD and CV is indicating low level deviation from its mean value. A
liquidity position of the company was satisfactory. A current ratio of Apollo tyre Ltd. was not
satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 1.32:1 times and its result of
SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value. The current ratio of JK
tyre & industries Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is
0.99:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating a very low level deviation from its
mean value. A current ratio of CEAT Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The
mean value of ratio is 1.14:1 times. Its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation
from its mean value. The current ratio of TVS Srichakra Ltd. was not satisfactory during the
study period. The mean value of ratio is 1.54:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating
a low level deviation from its mean value. The current ratio of Good Year Ltd. was not
satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 1.80:1 times and its result of
SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
Quick Ratio
It means the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities. It is also called as liquidity ratio
or acid-test ratio. It is calculated by dividing the total of the quick assets by the total current
liabilities. It is a fairly stringent measure of liquidity. The standard ratio of 1:1is considered
as a measuring scale of the adequacy of Quick assets. The following table to given quick ratio
of select tyre companies in India.
Table 3 Quick Ratio of Select Tyre Companies in India
(Times)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 1.26 6.00 1.36 0.65 1.23 2.91 1.21
2009-10 1.25 5.35 0.96 0.56 0.83 0.98 1.17
2010-11 1.16 3.43 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.85 1.15
2011-12 1.00 1.03 0.34 0.60 0.47 0.48 1.13
2012-13 1.24 1.17 0.34 0.56 0.47 0.56 1.25
2013-14 1.35 0.19 0.34 0.65 0.51 0.61 1.38
2014-15 1.42 0.31 0.40 0.64 0.75 0.50 1.87
2015-16 1.42 0.87 0.60 0.68 0.69 0.57 1.87
2016-17 1.07 0.78 0.96 0.68 0.67 0.42 1.80
2017-18 1.21 0.99 1.03 0.53 0.57 0.51 1.77
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:495
Mean 1.24 2.01 0.70 0.62 0.68 0.84 1.46
SD 0.14 2.13 0.36 0.05 0.23 0.75 0.32
CV% 11.03 105.89 51.39 8.70 33.28 89.40 22.14
Source: Computed from Annual Reports
Table 3 shows that quick ratio of MRF Ltd. was satisfactory during the study period.
The mean value of ratio was 1.24:1times and the result of SD and CV is indicting a low level
deviation its mean value. The quick ratio of Balkrishna Industries Ltd. was satisfactory
during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 2.01:1 times and result of SD and CV is
indicating moderate level deviation from its mean value. A quick ratio of Apollo tyre Ltd.
was not satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 0.70:1 times and its
result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value. The quick ratio
of JK tyre & industries Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of
ratio is 0.62:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating a very low level deviation from
its mean value. A quick ratio of CEAT Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The
mean value of ratio is 0.68:1 times. Its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation
from its mean value. The quick ratio of TVS Srichakra Ltd. was not satisfactory during the
study period. The mean value of ratio is 0.84:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating
a low level deviation from its mean value. The quick ratio of Good Year Ltd. was not
satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 1.80:1 times and its result of
SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
Absolute liquid ratio or Cash position ratio
It is refers to the absolute liquid assets to current liabilities. The satisfactory level of
this ratio is 0.50:1. The ratio was calculated as, Absolute Liquid Ratio = Cash and bank
balance + Market securities / Current Liabilities. A following table to analyse absolute liquid
ratio of select tyre companies in India.
Table 4 Absolute Liquid Ratio of Select Tyre Companies in India
(Times)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 0.10 0.13 0.74 0.06 0.41 0.26 0.75
2009-10 0.07 0.04 0.37 0.06 0.19 0.05 0.81
2010-11 0.04 0.05 0.14 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.76
2011-12 0.03 0.35 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.67
2012-13 0.14 0.31 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.79
2013-14 0.27 0.00 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.02 1.02
2014-15 0.03 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.02 1.19
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:496
2015-16 0.03 0.20 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.03 1.19
2016-17 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.01 1.28
2017-18 0.03 0.13 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.02 1.24
Mean 0.08 0.13 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.05 0.97
SD 0.08 0.12 0.22 0.02 0.13 0.08 0.24
CV% 96.20 86.03 116.73 44.33 144.61 140.29 24.65
Source: Computed from Annual Reports
Table 4 shows that absolute liquid ratio of MRF Ltd. was not satisfactory during the
study period. The mean value of ratio was 0.08:1times and the result of SD and CV is
indicting a low level deviation its mean value. The absolute liquid ratio of Balkrishna
Industries Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 0.12:1
times and result of SD and CV is indicating moderate level deviation from its mean value. An
absolute liquid ratio of Apollo tyre Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The
mean value of ratio is 0.19:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level
deviation from its mean value. The quick ratio of JK tyre & industries Ltd. was not
satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 0.04:1 times and its result of
SD and CV is indicating a very low level deviation from its mean value. An absolute liquid
ratio of CEAT Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study period. The mean value of ratio is
0.09:1 times. Its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
The quick ratio of TVS Srichakra Ltd. was not satisfactory during the study periodss. The
mean value of ratio is 0.84:1 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level
deviation from its mean value. The quick ratio of Good Year Ltd. was not satisfactory during
the study period. The mean value of ratio is 1.80:1 times and its result of SD and CV is
indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
Debtors’ turnover ratio
Debtor’s turnover ratio its measure the total debtor’s to credit sales of the year. The
ratio was calculated as total debtors divided by the credit sales. A following table to analyse
debtor’s turnover ratio of select tyre companies in India.
Table 5 shows the Debtors Turnover Ratio of select Tyre Companies in India
(Times)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 9.76 5.72 46.64 11.08 7.89 5.41 10.29
2009-10 9.18 5.77 36.62 7.54 7.46 5.89 13.28
2010-11 7.44 6.15 26.88 6.74 7.40 6.24 11.57
2011-12 12.64 5.88 22.42 6.51 7.30 7.40 9.60
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:497
2012-13 11.88 6.32 31.15 6.55 7.68 7.92 9.49
2013-14 11.58 5.78 35.79 5.53 7.48 6.27 14.08
2014-15 13.15 6.28 27.74 5.40 8.38 11.37 11.75
2015-16 13.15 5.86 29.43 5.42 9.51 12.04 11.75
2016-17 8.79 9.19 25.37 4.50 10.77 10.47 10.35
2017-18 7.62 8.89 18.88 5.10 8.89 9.04 8.19
Mean 10.52 6.58 30.09 6.44 8.28 8.20 11.04
SD 2.22 1.31 7.98 1.87 1.14 2.40 1.80
CV% 21.14% 19.97% 26.52% 29.01% 13.75% 29.30% 16.33%
Source: Computed from Annual Reports
Table 5 shows that debtors turnover ratio of MRF Ltd. was low during the study
period. The mean value of ratio was 10.52 times and the result of SD and CV is indicting a
low level deviation its mean value. The debtor turnover ratio of Balkrishna Industries Ltd.
was fluctuated during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 6.58 times and result of SD
and CV is indicating low level deviation from its mean value. A debtor turnover ratio of
Apollo tyre Ltd. was low during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 30.09 times and
its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value. The debtor
turnover ratio of JK tyre & industries Ltd. was low during the study period. The mean value
of ratio is 6.44 times and its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its
mean value. A debtor turnover ratio of CEAT Ltd. was low during the study period. The
mean value of ratio is 8.28 times. Its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation
from its mean value. The debtor turnover ratio of TVS Srichakra Ltd. was low satisfactory
during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 8.20 times and its result of SD and CV is
indicating a moderate level deviation from its mean value. The debtor turnover ratio of Good
Year Ltd. was fluctuating during the study period. The mean value of ratio is 11.04 times and
its result of SD and CV is indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
Average Collection Period
Table 6 shows the Average Collection Period of select Tyre Companies in India
(Times)
Year MRF BKT Apollo JK CEAT TVS GOOD
YEAR
2008-09 37.38 63.85 7.83 32.94 46.28 67.50 35.48
2009-10 39.74 63.24 9.97 48.39 48.92 61.95 27.48
2010-11 49.04 59.36 13.58 54.17 49.31 58.50 31.54
2011-12 28.89 62.08 16.28 56.10 50.00 49.30 38.04
2012-13 30.73 57.71 11.72 55.74 47.54 46.10 38.46
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:498
2013-14 31.52 63.11 10.20 66.01 48.79 58.19 25.92
2014-15 27.76 58.12 13.16 67.58 43.53 32.11 31.06
2015-16 27.76 62.30 12.40 67.30 38.40 30.32 31.06
2016-17 41.52 39.71 14.39 81.18 33.89 34.87 35.27
2017-18 47.92 41.04 19.33 71.56 41.06 40.38 44.56
Mean 36.23 57.05 12.88 60.10 44.77 47.92 33.89
SD 8.11 9.06 3.31 13.60 5.43 13.29 5.60
CV% 22.39 15.87% 25.72 22.62% 12.13% 27.73% 16.54%
Source: Computed from Annual Reports
Table 5 shows that average collection period of MRF Ltd. was fluctuating during the
study period. Its mean value of 36.23 days and the result of SD and CV is indicting a
moderate level deviation its mean value. The average collection period of Balkrishna
Industries Ltd. was fluctuated during the study period. Its mean value of 57.05 days and result
of SD and CV is indicating moderate level deviation from its mean value. An average
collection period of Apollo tyre Ltd. was low during the study period. Its mean value of 12.88
days and its result of SD and CV are indicating a low level deviation from its mean value.
The average collection period of JK tyre & industries Ltd. was low during the study period.
Its mean value of 60.10 days and its result of SD and CV are indicating a moderate level
deviation from its mean value. An average collection period of CEAT Ltd. was increase
during the study period. Its mean value is 44.77 days and a result of SD and CV is indicating
a low level deviation from its mean value. The average collection period of TVS Srichakra
Ltd. was fluctuating during the study period. The mean value is 47.92 days and its result of
SD and CV is indicating a moderate level deviation from its mean value. The average
collection period of Good Year Ltd. was fluctuating during the study period. Its mean value is
33.89 days and its result of SD and CV is indicating a moderate level deviation from its mean
value.
CONCLUSIONS
Tyre is the most important unavoidable raw material of all types of automobile
vehicles. It is the way of Indian tyre industry major role in quality tyres producer and to
supply a product over the world. A researcher has to analyze the liquidity management of
select tyre companies in India. The liquidity position of MRF Tyre Ltd, Balkrishna Industries
Ltd. Apollo tyre Ltd. was satisfactory and other rest of the company liquidity position was
not satisfactory. At the same time the cash position of the Good year Ltd. was satisfactory
rest of the companies was not maintain at minimum level of standard norms 0.50:1 times.
Hence during the study period 2016-17 to 2017-18 all the tyre manufacturing companies to
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:499
slightly down the assets position. The average collection period of Apollo tyre Ltd. was good
performance other rest of the companies to be not performing the earning period of day is
high.
REFERENCES
1. Shashi K Gupta. Sharma R.K. Management Accounting Kalyani Publishers, New
Delhi – 110 002.
2. Pandey I. M (2011). ‘Financial Management” Vikash Publishing House Pvt.
3. Shashi K. Gupta ‘Management Accounting’ Kalyani Publishers, Third Revised
Edition 2014, Reprinted 2016.
4. Anil Soni (2012), ‘Working Capital Management with Special Reference to
Vardhman Textiles Ltd’ International Journal of Research in IT and
Management, Vol. 2, No. 5, Pp. 99-106
5. Amalendu Bhunia (2014), ‘Liquidity Position of Private Sector Textile
Companies in India-A Case Study,’ Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and
Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, Pp. 57-63.
6. Vekateswarlu P (2015), ‘Liquidity Management of Select Cement Companies of
Andhra Pradesh-A Comparative Study’ Vol. 3, No. 5, Pp. 31-42.
7. Pritesh C. Panchal (2016), ‘Liquidity Analysis of Selected Infrastructure
companies - A Comparative Study,’ International Journal for Research in
Business, Management and Accounting, Vol. 2, No. 3, Pp. 56-61.
Websites
https://www.mrftyres.com
https://www.bkt-tires.com
https://www.apollotyres.com
https://www.jktyre.com
https://www.ceat.com
https://www.tvstyres.com
https://www.goodyear.com
www.moneycontrol.com
www.tyremarket.com
The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis
Volume XI, Issue X, October/2019
ISSN NO: 0886-9367
Page No:500