the jagged prism of race

4
Scott McMurtry ENG 297A Literary Analysis Paper Dr. Hawhee 4/10/2013 The Jagged Prism of Race Sports and race often seem inseparably connected. Whether overtly or subconsciously, athletic competition is frequently framed in a racial context. Associations between positions or teams and a specific race are the norm. Duke University basketball, for instance, is widely considered to be a “white program.” In the ESPN documentary The Fab Five (of which he served as an executive producer), Jalen Rose expressed his belief that “Schools like Duke didn’t recruit players like me….I felt like they only recruited black players who were Uncle Toms.” Quite an accusation, and it stirred up quite a controversy after The Fab Five’s airing. 1 Likewise, the thought of a white player starting at tailback for an NFL team is almost comical to many football observers. Peyton Hillis, the only such white starting tailback in the 2011 season, told Sports Illustrated’s Dan Patrick that he was often taunted by opponents about his race. A thoughtful observer might take a step back and ask, “Why does it matter how many white or black players Duke starts in basketball?” or “Who cares what the Cleveland Browns’ running back looks like? Shouldn’t we just care about how many yards he racks up?” Why race still matters in sports is a question without a clear answer, but both Friday Night Lights and 1 Indeed, former Duke player Grant Hill (himself an African‐American who was singled out by Rose in the documentary) responded to Rose’s statements with a 1,250 word op‐ed that ran on the New York Times’ website and was syndicated in newspapers nationwide.

Upload: scottmcmurtry

Post on 28-Mar-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Academic Writing

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Jagged Prism of Race

ScottMcMurtry

ENG297ALiteraryAnalysisPaper

Dr.Hawhee

4/10/2013

TheJaggedPrismofRace

Sportsandraceoftenseeminseparablyconnected.Whetherovertlyor

subconsciously,athleticcompetitionisfrequentlyframedinaracialcontext.

Associationsbetweenpositionsorteamsandaspecificracearethenorm.Duke

Universitybasketball,forinstance,iswidelyconsideredtobea“whiteprogram.”In

theESPNdocumentaryTheFabFive(ofwhichheservedasanexecutiveproducer),

JalenRoseexpressedhisbeliefthat“SchoolslikeDukedidn’trecruitplayerslike

me….IfeltliketheyonlyrecruitedblackplayerswhowereUncleToms.”Quitean

accusation,anditstirredupquiteacontroversyafterTheFabFive’sairing.1

Likewise,thethoughtofawhiteplayerstartingattailbackforanNFLteamisalmost

comicaltomanyfootballobservers.PeytonHillis,theonlysuchwhitestarting

tailbackinthe2011season,toldSportsIllustrated’sDanPatrickthathewasoften

tauntedbyopponentsabouthisrace.Athoughtfulobservermighttakeastepback

andask,“WhydoesitmatterhowmanywhiteorblackplayersDukestartsin

basketball?”or“WhocareswhattheClevelandBrowns’runningbacklookslike?

Shouldn’twejustcareabouthowmanyyardsheracksup?”Whyracestillmatters

insportsisaquestionwithoutaclearanswer,butbothFridayNightLightsand1Indeed,formerDukeplayerGrantHill(himselfanAfrican‐AmericanwhowassingledoutbyRoseinthedocumentary)respondedtoRose’sstatementswitha1,250wordop‐edthatranontheNewYorkTimes’websiteandwassyndicatedinnewspapersnationwide.

Page 2: The Jagged Prism of Race

“VanillaDunk”attempttoquestionthenegativeimplicationsofviewingsports

throughtheprismofrace.

JonathanLethem’s“VanillaDunk”envisionsafuturisticNBAinwhichthe

playersutilize(via“exosuits”)theskillsetsofretiredsuperstars.Eventhoughthey

play,inasense,outsidethefeaturesoftheirownbodies,raceisstillamajorfactor

becauseoftheinseparabilityofbasketballandracialidentity.Thenarrator(awhite

centernamedLassnerwithRalphSampson’sskills)illustratedthedynamiconpage

82:

Whenablackguycouldn’tjumptheysaidhehad“whitelegs,”orifhe

wasslowitwas“whiteman’sdisease.”Basketballwasawhitesport

thatblackshadtakenoverandyettheaudiencewasstillprettymuch

white.Andthatwhiteaudienceadoredtheblackplayersfortheir

brilliantmoves—thankstosampling,thatadorationwouldprobably

killthesport—andyetwasstillthoughttorequirethetokenwhite

face,forpurposesof“identification.”

Lassnerhitsontwomajorracialtopicsinhissummationofbasketball’scultural

trends.Thefirstistheassociationofvibrantandexplosiveplaywiththe“black

game,”asopposedtothewhitevarietyofbasketball,whichwasthoughtto

encompasstacticalmasteryandsetshooting.“Ploddingandcorporateandreliable,”

inthewordsofthenarrator,versus“individualandexpressiveandsooftenself‐

destructive,some‐againsttheworld”(82).Giventhedirectconnectionbetween

skincolorandassumedstyleofplay,itbecomeseasytoseehowawhiterookie

draftingthe“Jordanskills”wouldbenoteworthyand,quickly,controversial.When

Page 3: The Jagged Prism of Race

theself‐styled“VanillaDunk”indeedreceivesMichaelJordan’stalent,Lassner’s

teammateElwood(whoisblack)offerstheopinionthat“Jordan’smovesaretoo

funkyforawhitecat.Theyprogramhissuitit’sgonnabreakhiships”(73).Lethem

dropshintsthroughouttheshortstorythatindicateanoverallmessagecriticalof

fixationonrace.“Solvebasketball,”Lassner’scharactersaysaftertheabove

explanationoftheracialbreakdown,“andyoumightsolveeverything”(83).The

conclusioncanbereadsimilarly.Afterrevealingthatheoftenconsiderswho

ultimately“won”thepersonal,blackvs.whitebattlebetweenElwoodandVanilla

Dunk,Lassnerendstheshortstorybyexclaiming,“OthertimesIconcludethat

there’ssomethingprettyfundamentallystupidaboutthequestion”(119).

InFridayNightLights,BuzzBissingerconstantlyhighlightstheissuesofrace

thatsurroundthePermianHighfootballprogram.While“VanillaDunk”(afictional

story,afterall)triestoaddresstopicsofraceindirectly,thereisnosuchnuancein

Bissinger’smasterpiece.Untilthemid‐1980s,PermianHighSchoolhadremained

virtuallysegregated,andbythe1988seasonracisminOdessawasstillshockingly

pervasive.African‐AmericanswereacceptedintothePermianfootballmachineonly

becausetheyprovidedtheteamwithbonustalent.Inasortofperverseway,

Permianfootballbroughtblacksandwhitestogether,butBissingermakesitvery

clearthattheassociationwas—quiteliterally—skindeep.Thissuperficialalliance

isperhapsbestillustratedbywhiteOdessaresidentLanitaAtkins,whoexplainedto

BissingerthatoncetheydonnedthePantheruniforms,theblackplayersbecame

acceptabletowhitefans:“Thoseboysarenotniggerstothem….TheyareMojos”

(108).IfthatstatementdoesnotsumuptheracialdynamicinOdessaatthetime,

Page 4: The Jagged Prism of Race

nonepossiblycan.Theapprovalofblackplayersmerelybasedontheir

contributionstothefootballteam’ssuccessisshownassordidandexploitative.

StarblackrunningbackBoobieMileswouldcertainlybewelcomedbythewhite

communityaslongasheprovidedMojowithyardsandtouchdowns,butifthatno

longerbecamethecase?BissingeraskedwhiteresidentswhattheBoobie’svalue

wouldbewithoutfootball,andtheresultswereincredible.Somesuggestedhebe

euthanizedlikeaninjuredracehorse.EvenaPermiancoachexpressedtheopinion

thatwereBoobienolongeraPermiantailback,hewouldjustbe“abigol’dumb

nigger”—andBissingerstatesthatinOdessa,thatanswerwas“obvious,asclearas

dayandnight,blackandwhite”(67).Blackplayerswerenotsimplyviewedasofa

differentathleticcaliber,asin“VanillaDunk.”Theywereregardedasassetswho

couldhelptheteamwinbutwereotherwiselessthanfullhumans.FridayNight

Lights,throughitsrawpresentationofnearlyunbelievableracistattitudes,shows

perhapsthemostextremecaseofthedangersarisingfromherdingathletesinto

categoriesbasedonrace.

Thoughtheyvaryindirectnessanddegreeofcontent,both“VanillaDunk”

andFridayNightLightsservetowarnagainstexperiencingsportsvianotionsof

race.Lethemintroducestheissueandchallengesthereadertothinkaboutwhy

racialdistinctionsmatter,andiftheyshouldreallyhaveanymeaningatall.“Vanilla

Dunk”doesnotcondemnthosewhoseedifferencesbetweenwhiteandblack

playersasinherentlyracist,butdoespushthemtoconsiderthereasonstheyview

thegamethusly.FridayNightLightstakesthenextstep,presentinginstarkdetail

theworstexcessesofracialstereotypingwhenitcomestoathleticcompetition.