the larger context of rice terraces glenn davis stone washington univ., st. louis the ifugao rice...

26
The Larger Context of Rice Terraces Glenn Davis Stone Washington Univ., St. Louis The Ifugao Rice Terraces: Antiquity, Management, and Conservancy June 18, 2015 National Museum, Manila

Upload: tamsin-hamilton

Post on 23-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Larger Context of Rice Terraces

Glenn Davis StoneWashington Univ., St. Louis

The Ifugao Rice Terraces: Antiquity, Management, and Conservancy

June 18, 2015

National Museum, Manila

Trincheras (ancient terraces, SW U.S. and Northern Mexico)

Kofyar terracesIntensive agriculturePlateau State, Nigeria

Low ponded terracesAndhra Pradesh, India

Rice Terraces

Theory of agricultural change

Rice is exceptional

Terraces are exceptional

6

Boserup, Ester (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure.

Theory of agricultural intensification• "dynamic model for all primitive agriculture" • Boserup -- input of mostly local resources• industrialization -- use of off-farm resources, mostly produced industrially

Extensive Intensive

7

• Extensive (shifting, slash & burn, swidden) capitalizes on fire & fallow• Fire clears canopy, fertilizes, kills pests• Fallow re-fertilizes, removes pest habitat, creates fodder• Broadcast or dibble seeds, little fertilizing, weeding• Used when possible because efficient (low input:output)

• Population pressure reduces fallow area• Fertilizing• Tillage• Weeding• Bring more labor-intensive land into cultivation

(“locational intensification” Stone 1996)

•Overall effects:

• Longer work hours• Output per area/time rises • Efficiency drops; decreasing marginal returns

Ecology of Intensification Extensive Intensive

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Bush fallowhigh efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Bush fallowhigh efficiency

Grass fallowmedium efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Bush fallowhigh efficiency

Grass fallowmedium efficiency

Annual cultivationlow efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Bush fallowhigh efficiency

Grass fallowmedium efficiency

Annual cultivationlow efficiency

Multi-croppingvery low efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

PO

PU

LATIO

N

AGRICULTURAL INTENSITY

Tree fallowvery high efficiency

Bush fallowhigh efficiency

Grass fallowmedium efficiency

Annual cultivationlow efficiency

Multi-croppingvery low efficiency

Boserupian Intensification

T E R R A C I N G

• Boserup’s theory ties agricultural intensity to population pressure, as opposed to "grand, inclusive schema like those of cultural evolution" • (Stone & Downum 1998, “Non-Boserupian Ecology”; Netting Smallholders 1993:261)

• It can reverse: when population density drops, intensity drops (e.g., Kofyar)

• Driving force in agricultural practices is efficiency (returns to labor)

• Simplified but invaluable model of agricultural change

Extensive (“upland”) rice

Intensive (“wet”) rice

Is wet rice RICE Boserupian?

In some ways:

high input high outputoften under high population density

as she predicts

But relatively efficient!

"Where a transition from broadcast sowing to transplanting, or from single- to double-cropping is made, the increases in yield will certainly outstrip concomitant rises in labour inputs.“

Francesca Bray 1986:5, The Rice Economies

17

“Soup bowl ecology”

• Nitrogen fixing bacteria

• Water extremely effective weed control

• Years of continuous cultivation develops good waterproof hardpan covered in mud (podzolisation)

• May hold fertility indefinitely (at least at a certain level of multicropping)

• Ponds conducive to other economic species

Philippines China Louisianaextensive wet industrial

--------------------------------------------------

labor hrs/ha 576 3045 25animal hrs/ha 272 332 0energy kcal/ha 1.8 mil 7.6 mil 11.5 milyield kcal/ha 6 mil 29 mil 15 milyield kg/ha 1700 8000 4100efficiency 3.3 3.2 1.3(kcal output:input)

(Source: Wen & Pimental 1986)

Input/Output (efficiency) comparisons

Terraces

Are not just another form of intensification

Cerro de Trincheras as civic archtecture

Moray (Inca) site, Peru

Extensification normally easy• Kofyar switched to slash & burn

But especially on steep hills, terracing may have a “ratchet” effect• Incentives to maintain whole system

(selfie heaven)

Rice Terraces

Rice is agro-ecologically unique• Contrary to theories of agricultural change,

this intensive form of cultivation if relatively efficient

Terraces are a unique form of intensification• Can exert ratchet effect• Form of architecture• Landscape feature with value beyond

agriculture

Thank You

Research in India - Philippines supported by • National Science Foundation• Wenner-Gren Foundation• Templeton Foundation

Collaborators & associates• IDS (D. Glover)• UCLA field school (S. Acabado)• SITMo (M. Martin)• IRRI (N. Vera Cruz)