the last days according to jesus
TRANSCRIPT
©1998byR.C.Sproul
PublishedbyBakerBooksadivisionofBakerPublishingGroupP.O.Box6287,GrandRapids,MI49516-6287www.bakerbooks.com
Neweditionpublished2015
Ebookeditioncreated2015Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans—forexample,electronic,photocopy,recording—withoutthepriorwrittenpermissionofthepublisher.Theonlyexceptionisbriefquotationsinprintedreviews.
LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataisonfileattheLibraryofCongress,Washington,DC.
ISBN978-1-5855-8092-7
ScripturequotationsarefromtheNewKingJamesVersion.Copyright©1982byThomasNelson,Inc.Usedbypermission.Allrightsreserved.
TheProprietorisrepresentedbytheliteraryagencyofWolgemuth&Associates,Inc.
ToGarrettBrown
CONTENTS
Cover1
TitlePage3
CopyrightPage4
Dedication5
ListofTablesandFigures9
Introduction11
1.WhatDidJesusTeachonMountOlivet?33
2.What“Generation”WillWitnesstheEnd?57
3.What“Age”WasabouttoEnd?79
4.WhatDidPaulTeachinHisLetters?103
5.WhatabouttheDestructionofJerusalem?123
6.WhatDidJohnTeachinRevelation?141
7.WhenIstheResurrection?163
8.WhoIstheAntichrist?185
9.WhenIstheMillennium?205
Appendixes
1.TheOlivetDiscourseaccordingtoMatthew219
2.TheOlivetDiscourseinMatthew,Mark,andLuke226
Notes241
Glossary251
BibliographyofWorksCited253
IndexofNames263
IndexofScripture267
AmongOtherBooksbyR.C.Sproul272
BackCover273
LISTOFTABLESANDFIGURES
Tables
1.1SignsofJesus’sComingandoftheEnd40
3.1TheWorldinMatthew13:38–4081
3.2TheNearnessoftheLastDaystotheApostles96
4.1ReferencestotheLastTimes115
5.1TheJudgmentonJerusalemaccordingtoHistory138
6.1Time-FrameReferencesinRevelation151
6.2SourcesofInformationConcerningJohnandRevelation154
6.3TheSixthKingofRevelation17:10160
7.1DifferencesbetweenPreterists168
7.2ThePartial-PreteristView183
8.1TheAntichrist198
8.2Nero’sNumber203
9.1AdvocatesofMillennialViews211
Figures
0.1TheEvolutionofIsrael’sReligionaccordingtotheReligiousHistoricalSchool21
6.1First-CenturyTimeline161
INTRODUCTION
YouwillnothavegonethroughthecitiesofIsraelbeforetheSonofMancomes.
Matthew10:23
JesusofNazarethwasafalseprophet!”ThissentimentexpressesaviewofChristthatgoesbeyondthebordersofslandertoflirtwiththesupremeformofblasphemyfromwhichthereisnorecovery.Itpeersintotheabyssinhabitedbylegionsofthedamned.ManywhoshrinkfromaffirmingthefulldeityofChristhedgetheirbetsby
applyingthehonorific“Prophet”tohisname.Fewareboldenoughintheirunbelieftohurlagainsthimthescurrilousepithet“falseprophet.”InIsraelthetermfalseprophetsignaledawarrantfordeathbystoning.ThefalseprophetwasascourgetothecommunitypreciselybecausehewasguiltyofmixingdrosswiththegoldofGod’struth,substitutingthecounterfeitforthegenuine,thelieforthetruth,andmisleadingthepeopleofGod,sometimesfatally.ThefalseprophetinIsraelwasdetectedbyhismakingfuturepredictionsthat
failedtocometopass.Thiswastheacidtesttoexposethedreamerwhoclaimedtheauthorityofthedivineoracletosanctionerroneouspronouncements.Godwasenlistedasanallyfordisinformation,indeed,claimedasthesourceorfountainofthepoisonouslie.Toprefaceone’sdeclarationwiththeclaim“ThussaiththeLord”wastoclaimdivineinspirationforamerehumanopinion,tograspforinfallibilitythatisnottheprovinceofuninspiredmen.ThechargeoffalseprophecyagainstJesusisnotmadelightlybysobermen.
Theconsequencesofsuchcalumnyaretoosevere.Ittakesabrashorsupremelyconfidentcritictoriskthistypeofjudgment.
SuchamanwasBertrandRussell.Russelldistinguishedhimselfasaworld-classphilosopherandmathematician.HeattainedpeerageintheBritishrealmforhismanyaccomplishments.Hewasfrequentlyinthenewsforhispassiveresistance
towar,particularlynuclearwar.Celebratedasoneoftheleadingintellectualsofhisera,Russellwastakenveryseriouslybytheintelligentsia.
Russell’sRejectionofChrist
Russell’slittlebookWhyIAmNotaChristian1setforthhispolemicagainstreligioningeneralandChristianityinparticular.Hewasconvincedthatreligionhashadanevilinfluenceonhumancivilization.“Thequestionofthetruthofareligionisonething,butthequestionofitsusefulnessisanother,”hewrote.“IamasfirmlyconvincedthatreligionsdoharmasIamthattheyareuntrue.”2ThoughRussellhedgeshisbetsalittlebydeclaringhisgeneralrespectforthe
moralcharacterofJesus,hedoesraiseobjectionstoJesus’srecordedbehavioratcertainpoints.Istressthepointof“recordedbehavior”becauseRussellwasskepticalregardingthebiblicalaccountofthelifeandteachingofChrist.“Historicallyitisquitedoubtful,”hesays,“whetherChristeverexistedatall,andifhedidwedonotknowanythingabouthim,sothatIamnotconcernedwiththehistoricalquestion,whichisaverydifficultone.”3Russellcontinues:“IamconcernedwithChristasheappearsintheGospels,
takingtheGospelnarrativeasitstands,andthereonedoesfindsomethingsthatdonotseemtobeverywise.Foronething,hecertainlythoughtthathissecondcomingwouldoccurincloudsofglorybeforethedeathofallthepeoplewhowerelivingatthattime.”4RussellcitesvarioustextsoftheNewTestamenttoprovehispoint:“There
areagreatmanytextsthatprovethat.Hesays,forinstance,‘YeshallnothavegoneoverthecitiesofIsraeltilltheSonofManbecome’(Matt.10:23).Thenhesays,‘TherearesomestandingherewhichshallnottastedeathtilltheSonofMancomesintohiskingdom’(Matt.16:28);andtherearealotofplaceswhereitisquiteclearthathebelievedthathissecondcomingwouldhappenduringthelifetimeofmanythenliving.Thatwasthebeliefofhisearlierfollowers,anditwasthebasisofagooddealofhismoralteaching....Inthatrespect,clearlyhewasnotsowiseassomeotherpeoplehavebeen,andhewascertainlynotsuperlativelywise.”5OneofRussell’schiefcriticismsoftheJesusportrayedintheGospelsisthat
Jesuswaswrongwithrespecttothetimingofhisfuturereturn.AtissueforRussellisthetime-framereferenceoftheseprophecies.RussellchargesthatJesusfailedtoreturnduringthetime-framehehadpredicted.ThereisironyinRussell’snegativepolemic.Oneofthemostimportant
proofsofChrist’scharacterandtheBible’sdivineinspirationisJesus’s
astonishinglyaccuratepredictionofthedestructionofthetempleandthefallofJerusalem,propheciescontainedintheOlivetDiscourse.Therecanbelittledoubtthatthebiblicalrecordofthispredictionantedatestheeventsthemselves.ItisnowalmostuniversallyacknowledgedthattheGospelsofMatthew,Mark,andLukewerewrittenbeforeAD70.Christ’spropheciesintheOlivetDiscoursediffersharplyfromancient
prophecieslikethoseoftheOracleofDelphi,whichwereexercisesintheartofstudiedambiguity.Theyleftfulfillmentsomewhatopenended,andtheywerecapableofdisparateinterpretation.Theseoraclesarenotunlikethepredictionsfoundinmoderndailyhoroscopes,whicharesufficientlybroadorambiguoustoallowforaccidentalfulfillment.NorcanJesus’sconcretepredictionsbeattributedtoeducatedguessesorthe
insightofafuturist.Tofirst-centuryJewsitwasunthinkablethatsuchcatastrophiceventsasthedestructionoftheHerodiantemple,thedevastationoftheholycityofJerusalem,andthedispersionoftheJewishpeopletothefourcornersoftheearthcouldtakeplaceintheforeseeablefuture.Sucheventswereeminentlynotforeseeable,savetoonewhohadinformationfromtheomniscientGodhimself.SotheveryprophecythatshouldconfirmboththecredentialsofJesusandthe
inspirationofScriptureis,ironically,theprophecyusedbycriticslikeRusselltodebunkbothJesusandtheBible.ProofforthetruthofScriptureandChristbecomesproofforthefalsehoodofboth.AsIshallpresentlyendeavortoshow,theskepticismexpressedbyRussellonthesemattersisbynomeanslimitedtohim,butistheaxethatisgroundbyahostofhigher-criticalscholarsoftheBible.Itwouldnotbeanoverstatementtosuggestthatthechiefgroundfortheradicalcriticismofmodernbiblicalscholarship,whichhasresultedinawholesaleattackonthetrustworthinessofScriptureandafar-reachingskepticismofourabilitytoknowanythingabouttherealhistoricalJesus,isthethesisthattheGospels’recordsofJesus’spredictionscontainglaringerrorsandgrossinaccuracies.ThemainproblemwithJesus’spredictionsintheOlivetDiscourseisthatthey
includenotonlypredictionsregardingJerusalemandthetemple,whichdidcometopasswithastonishingaccuracy,butalsopredictionsofhisowncominginglory,orhisparousia.ItisthesepredictionsregardingJesus’sreturnonwhichRussellseizedforfodderforhisnegativeapologia.ItistemptingtodismissRusselllightlywiththechargethat,thoughhewaseruditeandastuteinatleasttwomajoracademicdisciplines,hewasnotatrainedorskilledexegeteofScripture.Whenheexpressedhiscriticismsofthebiblicaltext,hewasspeakingoutsidethefieldofhisexpertise.Theproblem,however,isthatRussell’sisnota
lonevoiceinrecenthistory.Hiscriticismsareechoedbyamultitudeofhighlylearnedspecialistsinthefieldofbiblicalstudies.Imustincludeatthispointapersonalnote.Myownacademictrainingtook
placeforthemostpartatinstitutionsofhigherlearningthatarenotidentifiedwithconservativeorevangelicalChristianity.OneofmychiefprofessorsincollegewasadoctoralstudentunderRudolfBultmann.InseminaryIwasexposeddailytocriticaltheoriesespousedbymyprofessorsregardingtheScripture.WhatstandsoutinmymemoryofthosedaysistheheavyemphasisonbiblicaltextsregardingthereturnofChrist,whichwereconstantlycitedasexamplesoferrorsintheNewTestamentandproofthatthetexthadbeeneditedtoaccommodatethecrisisintheearlychurchcausedbytheso-calledparousia-delayofJesus.Inaword,muchofthecriticismleveledagainstthetrustworthinessofScripturewaslinkedtoquestionsregardingbiblicaleschatology.
Jesus’sTime-FrameReferences
Thetime-framereferencesoftheOlivetDiscourseareprominentinthedebateovertheintegrityofbothChristandtheBible.Markreportsthisdiscourseasfollows:
Thenashewentoutofthetemple,oneofhisdisciplessaidtohim,“Teacher,seewhatmannerofstonesandwhatbuildingsarehere!”AndJesusansweredandsaidtohim,“Doyouseethesegreatbuildings?Notonestoneshallbeleftuponanother,thatshallnotbethrowndown.”NowashesatontheMountofOlivesoppositethetemple,Peter,James,John,andAndrewasked
himprivately,“Tellus,whenwillthesethingsbe?Andwhatwillbethesignwhenallthesethingswillbefulfilled?”AndJesus,answeringthem,begantosay:“Takeheedthatnoonedeceivesyou.FormanywillcomeinMyname,saying,‘Iamhe,’andwilldeceivemany.Andwhenyouhearofwarsandrumorsofwars,donotbetroubled;forsuchthingsmusthappen,buttheendisnotyet.Fornationwillriseagainstnation,andkingdomagainstkingdom.Andtherewillbeearthquakesinvariousplaces,andtherewillbefaminesandtroubles.Thesearethebeginningsofsorrows.Butwatchoutforyourselves,fortheywilldeliveryouuptocouncils,andyouwillbebeateninthesynagogues.AndyouwillbebroughtbeforerulersandkingsforMysake,foratestimonytothem.Andthegospelmustfirstbepreachedtoallthenations.Butwhentheyarrestyouanddeliveryouup,donotworrybeforehand,orpremeditatewhatyouwillspeak.Butwhateverisgivenyouinthathour,speakthat;foritisnotyouwhospeak,buttheHolySpirit.Nowbrotherwillbetraybrothertodeath,andafatherhischild;andchildrenwillriseupagainstparentsandcausethemtobeputtodeath.AndyouwillbehatedbyallmenforMyname’ssake.Buthewhoendurestotheendshallbesaved.“Butwhenyouseethe‘abominationofdesolation,’spokenofbyDanieltheprophet,standingwhere
itoughtnot”(letthereaderunderstand),“thenletthosewhoareinJudeafleetothemountains.Andlethimwhoisonthehousetopnotgodownintothehouse,norentertotakeanythingoutofhishouse.Andlethimwhoisinthefieldnotgobacktogethisgarment.Butwoetothosewhoarepregnantandtothosewithnursingbabiesinthosedays!Andpraythatyourflightmaynotbeinwinter.Forinthose
daystherewillbetribulation,suchashasnotbeenfromthebeginningofcreationwhichGodcreateduntilthistime,norevershallbe.AndunlesstheLordhadshortenedthosedays,nofleshwouldbesaved;butfortheelect’ssake,whomhechose,heshortenedthedays.Thenifanyonesaystoyou,‘Look,hereistheChrist!’or,‘Look,heisthere!’donotbelieveit.Forfalsechristsandfalseprophetswillriseandshowsignsandwonderstodeceive,ifpossible,eventheelect.Buttakeheed;see,Ihavetoldyouallthingsbeforehand.“Butinthosedays,afterthattribulation,thesunwillbedarkened,andthemoonwillnotgiveits
light;thestarsofheavenwillfall,andthepowersinheavenwillbeshaken.ThentheywillseetheSonofMancominginthecloudswithgreatpowerandglory.Andthenhewillsendhisangels,andgathertogetherhiselectfromthefourwinds,fromthefarthestpartofearthtothefarthestpartofheaven.“Nowlearnthisparablefromthefigtree:Whenitsbranchhasalreadybecometender,andputsforth
leaves,youknowthatsummerisnear.Soyoualso,whenyouseethesethingshappening,knowthatitisnear—attheverydoors!Assuredly,Isaytoyou,thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingstakeplace...”(Mark13:1–30).
ThemostcriticalportionofthistextisJesus’sdeclarationthat“thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingstakeplace”(13:30).WhenRussellpointedtothispronouncement,hemadetwoimportantassumptions.Thefirstisthat“thisgeneration”referstoaspecifictime-framethatwouldberoughlyfortyyears.Thatis,theterminusforthefulfillmentofthisprophecyisfortyyears.IfJesusmadethisannouncementsometimebetweenAD30and33,thenthedestructionofJerusaleminAD70wouldfitperfectlywithinthetime-frame.ThesecondassumptionmadebyRussell(andothers)isthatthephrase“allthesethings”includesallofthesubjectmatterofhisfutureprediction,includinghiscomingincloudsofpowerandglory.Giventheseassumptions,theprimafaciereadingofthetextleadstothe
conclusionthat,withinthetime-frameoffortyyears,notonlywillthetempleandJerusalembedestroyed,butalsotheparousia(orcoming)ofChristwilltakeplace.Since,againaccordingtoRussell,theparousiadidnottakeplacewithinthistime-frame,bothChristandtheBiblearewrong.BothofRussell’sassumptionshavebeenchallengedinmanifoldways,aswe
willseelater.Fornow,however,wearefocusingonthefirst-glancereadingofthetextthatisheldbyRussellandothers.ItismyfearthatevangelicalstodaytendtounderplaythesignificanceoftheproblemsinherentinRussell’sassumptions.Toooftenwetakeafacileapproachtotheproblemthatrevealsourfailuretofeeltheweightofsuchobjections.ThisbecomesparticularlyacutewhenwerealizetheextenttowhichtheseproblemshavecontributedtotheentiremoderncontroversyovertheinspirationofScriptureandthepersonandworkofChrist.Togainabetterfeelfortheproblem,wemusttakeashortreconnaissanceofmodernviewsofeschatology.
TheCrisisinEschatology
ThoughmanyofthecriticalviewsofScriptureprevalenttodayoriginatedintheEnlightenment,characterizedbyarelianceonrationalisticandnaturalisticphilosophy,theydidnotreachtheiracme(ornadir)untilthedevelopmentofso-calledliberalismthatheldswayinthenineteenthcentury.ThiserawasmarkedbythedominanceofHegelianphilosophy,whichprovidedanevolutionaryviewofhistorythatworkeditselfoutintermsofadialecticalprocess.AsdistinguishedfromtheMarxistviewof“dialecticalmaterialism,”Hegelianismhasbeendubbed“dialecticalidealism.”Iftherewasabuzzwordinnineteenth-centurytheoreticalthought,itwasthe
wordevolution.Theideaofevolutionwasappliednotsimplytobiology,butalsotootherfieldsofinquiry.PoliticaltheorysawtheapplicationofHerbertSpencer’s“socialDarwinianism,”forexample.Itisimportanttorealizethatevolutionencompasseschieflyatheoryofhistorywherebynotonlybiologicalentitiesundergoaprogressivedevelopmentfromthesimpletothecomplex,butalsootherentitiesundergoasimilarsortofprogressivechange.Marriedtoevolutionaryphilosophy,theReligiousHistoricalSchoolofthe
nineteenthcenturyconsidereditaxiomaticthatallreligionsgothroughevolutionarystagesofdevelopment.Theymovefromthesimpletothecomplex.Inthisschemeallreligionsbeginwithprimitiveformsofanimismandmovetoamorecomplexlevelofsophisticatedmonotheism.Nineteenth-centuryscholarssuchasJuliusWellhausenappliedthisschemetotheOldTestament.TheybelievedIsraelitereligionevolvedthroughfourdistinctstages:animism,polytheism,henotheism,andmonotheism(seefig.0.1).Animism,themostprimitiveform,seesobjectsofnatureasbeinginhabited
byevilspirits.HintsofthiswereseeninthespeakingserpentofGenesis3andinAbraham’sconversingwithangelsbytheOaksofMamre.CriticsarguedthatAbrahamwashavingadialoguewithspiritsthatinhabitedthetrees.Polytheismaffirmstheexistenceofmanygodsandgoddesseswhohave
designatedfunctionssuchasthoseinRomanmythologyandtheGreekpantheon.Herewefinddeitiesofwar,wisdom,love,agriculture,andsoforth.PolytheismwasallegedtoexistintheOldTestament,particularlywithreferencetothe“ESource”ofthePentateuch(thefirstfivebooksoftheBible),inwhichthechiefnameforGodwasElohim,whichhasapluralending.Henotheism,atransitionstagebetweenpolytheismandmonotheism,isthe
ideathateachnationorethnicgroupisruledbyasinglegod.Sothereareasmanygodsastherearenationsorethnicgroups.Thiswasallegedtobethecase
inIsraelitereligion,whichpittedthenationalgod,Yahweh,againstthegodsofothernations,suchasBaal(Judg.2:11–13)orDagon(Judg.16:23).Finallytheideaofmonotheismemerged(relativelylateinJewishhistory),
whichviewedGodastheLordofallcreation.
Withthedevelopmentofnineteenth-centuryliberalismcameaseriousefforttomodifyorrevisetheessenceofbiblicalreligion.CentraltothisreconstructionoftheChristianfaithwastheattempttoredefinethebiblicalconceptofthekingdomofGod.Asscholarshavenotedinrecenttimes,themotifofGod’skingdomweavestogethertheOldandNewTestamentsandprovidesthecontinuitybetweenthem.Nineteenth-centuryliberalismsoughtaChristianfaiththatisdesupernaturalizedandessentiallyimmanentisticinitsoutlook.UndertheinfluenceofHegelianphilosophy,thekingdomofGodwasevolvingnaturallywithouttheintrusionofatranscendentGod.Elementsofthemiraculouswererejectedoutofhandbythinkerssuchas
DavidFriedrichStraussandWilliamWrede.ThemiraclesoftheBible,especiallythoseattributedtoJesus,wereexplainedinnaturalisticterms.Forexamplethefeedingofthefivethousandwasinterpretedinvariousways,includingthesetwo:(1)Jesusandhisdiscipleshadalargestoreoffoodconcealedinacave.Jesusstoodinfrontofasmallopeningthroughwhich
provisionsweresecretlypassedtohimbyhishiddendisciples,andwerethendistributedtothemultitudes.ThiscrassviewreducedJesustoaclevermagicianandacharlatan.(2)JesususedtheexampleoftheladwhohadofferedtoJesushismeagerprovisions,toexhortthosewhohadbroughtlunchestosharewiththosewhohadnot.Thus,thiswasnotamiracleofnaturebutan“ethical”miracle,persuading
thosewhohadmuch,tosharewiththosewhohadnothing.Theaccentonethicswasprimarytotheliberalrevisionofbiblical
Christianity.LeadingthinkerssuchasAlbrechtRitschleschewedtheinfluenceofGreekmetaphysicalthoughtontheformulationofhistoriccreedssuchasattributingtheequalityofdivineessencetomembersoftheTrinity.HesawtheessenceofJesus’steachingnotassupernaturalredemptionbutasethicalandmoralvalues.LiberalscholarsrecastJesusasthesupremeteacherofethicsratherthanastheincarnateSonofGodwhowasbornofavirgin,whodiedanatoningdeathofcosmicsignificance,andwhowasraisedbodilyfromthedeadandascendedintoheaven.Thesesupernaturalelementsofthebiblicalportraitwererejected,andintheirplacewassubstitutedthemoralistJewwhoadvocatedakingdomofvaluesandsocialresponsibility.Itwassomewhatfashionableinthenineteenthcenturytocomparetheworld
religionsinanefforttodiscernanddistilltheessenceofthemallintoabasiccommondenominator.HereChristianitysufferedfromreductionismwithavengeance.ChurchhistorianAdolfHarnackpublishedalittlebookontheWesen,the“essence”or“being,”ofChristianity,whichwaspublishedinEnglishasWhatIsChristianity?6InthisvolumeHarnackreducedtheessenceofChristianitytotwofoundationalconcepts:theuniversalfatherhoodofGodandtheuniversalbrotherhoodofman.
Schweitzer’sQuest
Againstthisbackdropofliberalism,AlbertSchweitzerwrotehiswatershedbook,TheQuestoftheHistoricalJesus,7whichappearedfirstin1906undertheGermantitleVonReimaruszuWrede(“FromReimarustoWrede”).AstheGermantitlesuggests,Schweitzergaveacriticalanalysisofdevelopmentsinnineteenth-centurythought.HeembracedmuchofthethoughtofJohannesWeiss,whohadattackedRitschl’sconceptofanethical-valuekingdomthatistotallyimmanentandevolutionary.WeissarguedthatthisconceptisrootednotintheNewTestamentbutinEnlightenmenttheologyandtheethicalphilosophyofImmanuelKant.
HermanRidderbossaysofWeiss:“...[He]arguedthatJesus’spreachingofthekingdomofGodcanonlybeunderstoodinthelightofandagainstthebackgroundoftheworldofthoughtofhistime,especiallyofthelateJewishapocalypticwritings.Onthisview,everyconceptionofthekingdomofGodasanimmanentcommunityincourseofdevelopmentorasanethicalidealisconsequentlytoberejected;foritbecomesclearthatthekingdomofGodisapurelyfutureandeschatologicalevent,presupposingtheendofthisworld;and,therefore,cannotpossiblyrevealitselfalreadyinthisworld.”8WhenWeissspeaksofthekingdom’seschatologicalcharacter,heusesthe
wordeschatologicaltomeanmorethan“thefuture”or“thelastthings.”Herethetermcarriestheideaof“anactionwroughtbyGodthatistranscendentandcatastrophic.”Itisnotafutureeventthatemergesthroughevolutionarydevelopment,butafutureeventthatisbroughtonsuddenlyfromabove,anintrusionoftheworkofGod.ThiseschatologicalconceptofthekingdomofGodwasembracedby
Schweitzer.HesawthisasthekeytounderstandingthelifeandteachingofJesus.Schweitzercalledthisview“consistenteschatology.”ThoughhesoughttointerpretthelifeofJesusagainstthebackdropofatranscendenteschatology,heconcludedthatJesus’sowneschatologicalexpectationshadbeenunfulfilled.ThehistoricalJesusbelievedthatthekingdomwouldbeinauguratedbyacatastrophicactofGod,butthisdivineactdidnotmaterialize.AccordingtoSchweitzer,Jesusunderwentaseriesofcrises.Heexpectedthe
dramaticcomingofthekingdomatdifferentpointsofhisministry,suchaswhenhesentouttheseventy.Jesushadtofacepostponementstohisexpectation.HefinallyhopedthathissubmissiontothecrosswouldprovokeGodtoact.Whenthatalsofailedtohappen,Jesuscriedoutindespair,“MyGod,MyGod,whyhaveYouforsakenMe?”(Matt.27:46).Thiswastheanguishedcryofadisillusionedman.ForSchweitzer,theeschatologyofJesuswasunrealized.Thisledto
Schweitzer’sconceptof“parousia-delay.”Thewritingsoftheapostolicchurchreflectanadjustmentinthinking,amovementfromanexpectationofChrist’simminentreturn(andtheconsummationofthekingdom)toanexpectationofhisdelayedreturnintheunknownfuture.ThoughSchweitzerrejectedtheconceptofanethicalkingdomasthemotifof
Jesus’steachingandself-consciousnessandreplaceditwithaneschatologicalview,itwasaneschatologythatremainedunrealized.Thoughhisviewdidnotprevailamongscholars,Schweitzer’sworkprovokedmanytheoriesthatwrestledwiththeproblemshehadraised.
Schweitzer’sworkwasfollowedbythatofC.H.Dodd,whointroducedafull-scalesystemof“realizedeschatology.”ForDoddtheeschatologicalkingdomofGodisusheredinduringtheministryofChrist.ThepresenceofthekingdomisacommonthemeinJesus’sparables,asDoddnotesinTheParablesoftheKingdom.9InanotherworkDoddsays:
TheeschatologyoftheearlyChurchhastwosides.OntheonehandwehavethebeliefthatwiththecomingofChristthe“fullnessoftime”hasarrived,thepropheciesarefulfilled,andtheKingdomofGodisinauguratedonearth.Ontheotherhandwehavetheexpectationofaconsummationstillpendinginthefuture.ThereissometensionbetweenthetwoinalmostallNewTestamentwritings.Theydifferamongthemselveswithrespecttotherelationconceivedtoexistbetweenthefulfillmentwhichisalready[a]matterofhistory,andthefulfillmentwhichbelongstothefuture.IntheFourthGospelthelanguageof“futuristeschatology”islittleused.10
ForDoddthekingdomisessentiallyaspiritualrealitythathasbeencompletelyrealizedinthepast.ThetensionbetweenrealizedandunrealizedeschatologyhasplaguedNewTestamentscholarsinourtime.AttemptstorelievethisstresshavebeenofferedbybothOscarCullmannandHermanRidderbos.BothscholarshavesoughttounderstandtheNewTestamentconceptofthekingdomofGodintermsofthepresentandthefuture.Ridderboshaspopularizedtheconceptofthe“already”andthe“notyet”of
thekingdom(thealsandthenogniet).WhenJohntheBaptistappearsonthestageofhistory,amomentofcrisisisreached.UnliketheOldTestamentprophets,whoannouncedthecomingofthekingdomintheunknownordistantfuture,Johnannouncesthatitsarrivalisimminent.Heistheheraldofthecomingkingdom.Johndeclaresthat“theaxislaidtotherootofthetrees”and“Hiswinnowingfanisinhishand”(Matt.3:10,12).Theimagesoftheaxeandthefanbothcallattentiontotheradicalnearnessofthekingdom.Theimageoftheaxedoesnotindicatethatthewoodsmanismerelythinking
aboutcuttingdownatreeorthathehasmerelybegunthetaskbystrikingattheouterbark.Theimageinsteadisthatthetaskisnearlycomplete.Theaxehasalreadypenetratedtothecoreofthetree,hintingthatonemoredecisivestrokewillmakeitfall.Thefanreferstothewinnowingforkusedbyafarmertoseparatethewheat
fromthechaff.Thefarmerisnotheadingtohisbarntogetthefan.Itisalreadyinhishandandheisabouttobeginwinnowing.TheradicalcharacterofJohn’sbaptismisalsoseeninthislight.Hecalled
JewishpeopletoundergothiscleansingritebecausetheirKingisabouttoappearandtheyaredefiledandunreadytomeethim.ConsequentlyJohncallsthepeopletorepentandbebaptized.“Thekingdomofheavenisathand”(Matt.3:2).WiththecomingofJesus,thekingdomisinaugurated,reachingitsNew
Testamentacmeinhisascension.Theascensionisnotmerelya“goingup”toheaven.Itisagoingupforaspecificevent,hiscoronationandinvestitureastheKingofKingsandLordofLords.InsofarasJesuspresentlyoccupiesthisseatofcosmicauthority,thekingdomofGodhascome.Yethisreignremainsinvisibletomen.Itisyettobemadefullymanifestonearth.AtthispointOscarCullmannintroduceshisfamousD-Dayanalogy.The
resurrectionandascensionofChristrepresentstheD-dayofthekingdom,thedecisiveturningpointinredemptivehistory.InWorldWarIID-Daywasnottheendofthewar,butitwassuchadecisiveturningpointthatforallintentsandpurposesthewarwasover.Whatwasleftwasamop-upexercise(theBattleoftheBulgenotwithstanding).Inlikemannerthedecisiveworkofthekingdomhasbeenaccomplished.WearelivingintheinterimawaitingtheconsummationthatwilloccuratChrist’sparousia.Inadditiontotheseviewsofthekingdomandeschatology,weencounter
modernDispensationalism,whichregardsthekingdomasfuture.ForDispensationalismthekingdomwillnotcomeuntiltheparousia.Likewise,variousformsofpreterismhaveemerged.Preteristsarguenotonlythatthekingdomisapresentreality,butalsothatinarealhistoricalsensetheparousiahasalreadyoccurred.
Preterism
PreterismTheKingdomisapresentreality.
RadicalPreterismAllfuturepropheciesintheNThavealreadybeenfulfilled.
ModeratePreterismManyfuturepropheciesintheNThavealreadybeenfulfilled.Somecrucialprophecieshave
notyetbeenfulfilled.
ModeratePreterism
Wemaydistinguishbetweentwodistinctformsofpreterism,whichIcallradicalpreterismandmoderatepreterism.RadicalpreterismseesallfuturepropheciesoftheNewTestamentashavingalreadytakenplace,whilemoderatepreterism
stilllookstothefutureforcrucialeventstooccur.Thepurposeofthisbookistoevaluatemoderatepreterismanditsviewofeschatology.PerhapsthemostimportantscholarofthepreteristschoolisJ.StuartRussell.
Russell’sbookTheParousia11firstappearedin1878,withasecondeditionfollowingnineyearslater.The1887editionwasreprintedin1983.Russellanticipatedmanyofthetheoriesthatwouldbepresentedbytwentieth-centuryscholars.Hischiefconcernwasthetime-framereferencesofNewTestamenteschatology,particularlywithrespecttoJesus’sutterancesconcerningthecomingofthekingdomandtoJesus’sOlivetDiscourse.Inhissummaryattheendofthebook,Russellwrites:
WithoutgoingoverthegroundalreadytraverseditmaysufficeheretoappealtothreedistinctanddecisivedeclarationsofourLordrespectingthetimeofhiscoming,eachofthemaccompaniedwithasolemnaffirmation:
1. “VerilyIsayuntoyou,YeshallnothavegoneoverthecitiesofIsrael,tilltheSonofmanbecome”(Matt.10:23).
2. “VerilyIsayuntoyou,Therebesomestandinghere,whichshallnottastedeath,tilltheyseetheSonofmancominginhiskingdom”(Matt.16:28).
3. “VerilyIsayuntoyou,Thisgenerationshallnotpass,tillallthesethingsbefulfilled”(Matt.24:34).
Theplaingrammaticalmeaningofthesestatementshasbeenfullydiscussedinthesepages.Noviolencecanextortfromthemanyothersensethantheobviousandunambiguousone,viz.thatourLord’ssecondcomingwouldtakeplacewithinthelimitsoftheexistinggeneration.12
ThecentralthesisofRussellandindeedofallpreteristsisthattheNewTestament’stime-framereferenceswithrespecttotheparousiapointtoafulfillmentwithinthelifetimeofatleastsomeofJesus’sdisciples.SomeholdtoaprimaryfulfillmentinAD70,withasecondaryandfinalfulfillmentintheyet-unknownfuture.Whateverelsemaybesaidofpreterism,ithasachievedatleasttwothings:(1)ithasfocusedattentiononthetime-framereferencesofNewTestamenteschatology,and(2)ithashighlightedthesignificanceofJerusalem’sdestructioninredemptivehistory.
TheLifeofJamesStuartRussell
1816 BornonNovember28inElgin,Morayshire.
1829 EnteredKing’sCollege,Aberdeen.
1835 ReceivedMAdegree.
1843 BecameassistantministerinCongregationalchurchinGreatYarmouth.Laterbecametheminister.
1843 AttendedthefoundingoftheEvangelicalAlliance.
1857 BecameministerinCongregationalchurchinTottenhamandEdmonton.
1862 BecameministerinCongregationalchurchinBayswater.
1878 PublishedTheParousiaanonymously.
1887 PublishedsecondeditionofTheParousiaunderhisname.
1888 Retiredfromtheministry.
1895 DiedonOctober5.
Contemporaryeschatologicaltheories,especiallythosefoundwithinevangelicalism,arekeenlyinterestedinthesignificanceofeventssurroundingmodernIsraelandthecityofJerusalem.KarlBarthonceremarkedthatthemodernChristianmustreadwiththeBibleinonehandandthenewspaperintheother.ThedramaticreturntoPalestineoftheJews,thecreationofthestateofIsraelin1948,andtherecaptureofJerusalemin1967haveprovokedafrenzyofinterestineschatology.Weseenosignofthisendinganytimesoon.Books(suchastheLeftBehindseries),websites,andotherresourcesinsistthatwearelivinginthelastgeneration.Thequestionpersists:WhatisthesignificanceofmodernIsraelandJerusalemtobiblicalprophecy?Whateverone’sviewofmodernJerusalem,itisessentialthatweexaminethe
significanceofitsdestructionbytheRomansinthefirstcentury.IfthereconstructionofJerusalemissignificant,itcanonlybesoinlightofitsearlierdestruction.Nomatterwhatviewofeschatologyweembrace,wemusttakeseriouslytheredemptive-historicalimportanceofJerusalem’sdestructioninAD70.InTheLastDaysaccordingtoJesuswewilldevoteconsiderableattentionto
NewTestamentpropheciesbearingonthedestructionofJerusalem,aswellastheeyewitnessaccountofitprovidedbyJewishhistorianFlaviusJosephus.PropheciesofthecomingofGod’skingdomandtheparousiaofChristare
linkedbiblicallywithpropheciesofthedayoftheLord.ThisdayisviewedtosomedegreeasadayofdivinejudgmentandthepouringoutofGod’swrath.Theseconceptsareinterconnectedandmustbeviewedinrelationtoeachother.FromtheEnlightenmentonward,thechurchhasbeengrippedbyasevere
crisisregardingthetrustworthinessofScripture.Thespiritofskepticismthat
reignsinsomanyquartersisadirectresultoftheavalancheofcriticismleveledagainsttheBible.EarlyinthiscenturyDutchtheologianAbrahamKuyperlamentedthatbiblicalcriticismhaddegeneratedintobiblicalvandalism.ThetaskinourtimeistoanswerthecriticswhohavescornedtheScripturesandgivenusaChristoftheirownimaginations.TheonlyChrististhebiblicalChrist.AllrevisionistChristsarebutshadowsoftheantichrist.DuetothecrisisinconfidenceinthetruthandauthorityofScriptureandthe
subsequentcrisisregardingtherealhistoricalJesus,eschatologymustcometogripswiththetensionsoftime-framereferencesintheNewTestament.
1WHATDIDJESUSTEACHONMOUNT
OLIVET?
ThenthesignoftheSonofManwillappearinheaven,andthenallthetribesoftheearth...willseetheSonofMancomingonthecloudsofheaven.
Matthew24:30
TheOlivetDiscoursetakesitsnamefromtheplacewhereJesusdeliveredit.ThisdiscourseisrecordedinallthreeSynopticGospels:Matthew(chap.24),Mark(chap.13),andLuke(chap.21).ThisisthelongestteachingdiscourserecordedintheGospelofMark.“IntheGospelofMarkthereisnopassagemoreproblematicthanthepropheticdiscourseofJesusonthedestructionoftheTemple,”saysWilliamL.Lane.“ThequestionsposedbytheformandcontentofthechapterandbyitsrelationshiptotheGospelasawholearecomplexanddifficultandhavebeentheoccasionofanextensiveliterature.”1WhatLanesaysofMarkcouldalsobesaidofMatthewandLuke.Biblicalscholarshavequestionedtheauthenticityofthediscourse,whichhas
beencalled“thesmallapocalypse.”VincentTaylorcitesthistheory,whichhasbeenadoptedbymanycriticalscholars:“Thesuggestionisthat,inanticipationofthehorrorsofthesiegeofJerusalem,someunknownChristianeditedasmallJewishorJewish-Christianapocalypseasakindoffly-sheettogiveencouragementandhopetotheChristiansofhisday,andincorporatedtherewitheschatologicalsayingsofJesus.”2Othertheorieshaveclaimedthatthediscourseiseithercompletelyinauthentic
orreflectstheworkofalaterredactor(“editor”),whofusedtogetherdifferent
strandsofanoraltraditionthatoriginatedintheteachingofJesus,butnotinthehomogeneousformfoundintheGospelsthemselves.
Thediscoursebeginswiththesewords:
JesusbeginstheOlivetDiscoursewithastatementabouteverystoneofthetemplebeing“throwndown.”Itisimportanttonotethattheentirediscourseisprovokedbyhiswordsaboutthedestructionofthetemple.Thedisciplesrespondtohispredictionbyaskingaboutthetime-frameforthisevent.
InallthreeGospelsthedisciplesasktwoquestions:(1)Whenwillthesethingsbe?(2)Whatwillbethesignoftheirfulfillment?Wenotice,however,
thatonlyoneofthethreeaccountsincludesthequestionaboutthecomingofChristandtheendoftheage.ThisquestionisreportedbyMatthewbutomittedbybothLukeandMark.InhisCommentaryonaHarmonyoftheEvangelistsJohnCalvinsaysthat
whatisexplicitinMatthewisimplicitinMarkandLuke:Markmentionsfourdisciples,Peter,James,John,andAndrew.ButneitherhenorLukestatesthemattersofullyasMatthew;fortheyonlysaythatthedisciplesinquiredaboutthetimeofthedestructionofthetemple,and—asitwasathingdifficulttobebelieved—whatoutwardsignofitGodwouldgivefromheaven.MatthewtellsusthattheyinquiredaboutthetimeofChrist’scoming,andoftheendoftheworld.Butitmustbeobservedthat,havingbelievedfromtheirinfancythatthetemplewouldstandtilltheendoftime,andhavingthisopiniondeeplyrootedintheirminds,theydidnotsupposethat,whilethebuildingoftheworldstood,thetemplecouldfalltoruins.Accordingly,assoonasChristsaidthatthetemplewouldbedestroyed,theirthoughtsimmediatelyturnedtotheendoftheworld....TheyassociatethecomingofChristandtheendoftheworldasthingsinseparablefromeachother....3
Calvinregardedaserroneousthedisciples’assumptionthatthedestructionofJerusalemwouldcoincidewiththecomingofChristandtheendoftheworld.ThismeansthatJesuswasansweringaquestionthatcontainedfalseassumptions.
QuestionsJesusAnsweredonMountOlivet
Question1Whenwillthesethingsbe?
Question2Whatwillbethesignofa)yourcomingandb)theendoftheage?
ThepreteristviewofJ.StuartRusselldifferssharplyfromtheviewofCalvin.Russellarguesthatthedisciples’assumptionwascorrect—withonecrucialqualifier:thediscipleswereaskingnotabouttheendoftheworld,butabouttheendoftheage.ThisdistinctioniscriticalnotonlytoRussell,buttovirtuallyallpreterists.TheendinviewisnottheendofalltimebuttheendoftheJewishage.
“Itisgenerallyassumed,”Russellwrites,“thatthedisciplescametoourLordwiththreedifferentquestions,relatingtodifferenteventsseparatedfromeachotherbyalongintervaloftime;thatthefirstinquiry,‘Whenshallthesethingsbe?’—hadreferencetotheapproachingdestructionofthetemple;thatthesecondandthirdquestions,‘Whatshallbethesignofthycoming,andoftheendoftheworld?’—referredtoeventslongposteriortothedestructionofJerusalem,and,infact,notyetaccomplished.”4RussellvoiceshisdissentbyarguingthatallthreeGospelwriterscorrectly
incorporateallthreethingswithinthesamegeneralhistoricalevent:“St.MarkandSt.Lukemakethequestionofthedisciplesrefertooneeventandonetime....Itisnotonlypresumable,therefore,butindubitable,thatthequestionsofthedisciplesonlyrefertodifferentaspectsofthesamegreatevent.ThisharmonisesthestatementsofSt.MatthewwiththoseoftheotherEvangelists,andisplainlyrequiredbythecircumstancesofthecase.”5
BooksbyJamesStuartRussell
ALeaffromtheEarlyHistoryoftheAncientCongregationalChurchinGreatYarmouth,1642–1670.Yarmouth,1850.
NonconformityintheSeventeenthCentury:AnHistoricalDiscourseDeliveredattheCelebrationoftheBicentenaryoftheCongregationalChurch,Wattisfield,Suffolk...WithanOutlineoftheHistoryoftheChurchbyItsPastor[W.Warren].Norwich,1854.
TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’sSecondComing.London:Daldy,Isbister&Co.,1878.
TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’sSecondComing.Newed.London:T.FisherUnwin,1887.
ClearlyRussellassumesthatthetextofScriptureisinspired,andheapproachesthequestionofharmonizingtheGospelaccountsoftheOlivetDiscourseonthatbasis.GiventhetrustworthinessoftheBible,itbecomesclearthatifallthreeeventsaremerelyimplicitinthedisciples’queryinMarkandLuke,theseeventsaretiedtogetherexplicitlyintheGospelofMatthew.Thedisciples’unambiguousquestionisatime-framequestion.ThedisciplesaskwhenthesethingswillcometopassandwhatisthesignofChrist’scomingandoftheend?
ASolemnWarningJesusbeginshisanswerwithasolemnwarningagainstdeception.Matthewrecordshisanswerasfollows:AndJesusansweredandsaidtothem:“Takeheedthatnoonedeceivesyou.FormanywillcomeinMyname,saying,‘IamtheChrist,’andwilldeceivemany.Andyouwillhearofwarsandrumorsofwars.Seethatyouarenottroubled;forallthesethingsmustcometopass,buttheendisnotyet.Fornationwillriseagainstnation,andkingdomagainstkingdom.Andtherewillbefamines,pestilences,andearthquakesinvariousplaces.Allthesearethebeginningofsorrows.Thentheywilldeliveryouuptotribulationandkillyou,andyouwillbehatedbyallnationsforMyname’ssake.Andthenmanywillbeoffended,willbetrayoneanother,andwillhateoneanother.Thenmanyfalseprophetswillriseupanddeceivemany.Andbecauselawlessnesswillabound,theloveofmanywillgrowcold.Buthewhoendurestotheendshallbesaved”(Matt.24:4–13).
Jesusfocusesinitiallyontheperilsposedbytheappearanceoffalsemessiahs.RussellarguesthatthedeceptiveclaimsofthesefalsemessiahswerefulfilledintheperiodbetweentheascensionofChristandthedestructionofJerusalem:“FalseChristsandfalseprophetsbegantomaketheirappearanceataveryearlyperiodoftheChristianera,andcontinuedtoinfestthelanddowntotheverycloseofJewishhistory.Intheprocuratorshipof[Pontius]Pilate(AD36),onesuchappearedinSamaria,anddeludedgreatmultitudes.TherewasanotherintheprocuratorshipofCuspiusFadus(AD45).DuringthegovernmentofFelix(AD53–60),[Flavius]Josephustellsus‘thecountrywasfullofrobbers,magicians,falseprophets,falseMessiahs,andimpostors,whodeludedthepeoplewithpromisesofgreatevents.’”6Calvinagreedthatarashoffalsemessiahsaroseintheearly-churchera.“For
shortlyafterChrist’sresurrection,therearoseimpostors,everyoneofwhomprofessedtobetheChrist,”Calvinwrites.“AndasthetrueRedeemerhadnotonlybeenremovedfromtheworld,butoppressedbytheignominyofthecross,andyetthemindsofallwereexcitedbythehopeandinflamedwiththedesireofredemption,thosemenhadintheirpoweraplausibleopportunityofdeceiving.
Norcanitbedoubted,thatGodpermittedsuchreveriestoimposeontheJews,whohadsobaselyrejectedhisSon.”7
Table1.1SignsofJesus’sComingandoftheEnd
Matt.24: Mark13: Luke21:
Falsechrists 5 6 8
Warsandrumorsofwars 6 7 9
betweennationsand 7 8 10
betweenkingdoms 7 8 10
Famines 7 8 11
Pestilences,troubles 7 8 11
Earthquakes 7 8 11
PersecutionofChrist’sdisciples 9–10 9,11–13 12–17
ApostasyofprofessingChristians 10
Falseprophets 11
Lawlessness 12
Gospelpreachingworldwide 14 10
Abominationofdesolation 15 14 20
Greattribulation,distress 21 19 23
Astronomicalphenomena 29 24–25 25
ThoughCalvinacknowledgedthattheproblemoffalsechristsplaguedtheearlychurchaftertheresurrectionofChrist,heappliedthewarningtothechurchofallages,notlimitingittothechurchofthefirstcentury.Thisapplicationisquitelegitimate,astheappearanceofimpostorsisaperennialproblem.Thequestion,however,isthis:WhatsignificancedidJesus’swarninghaveforandtohisimmediatehearers?ItisonethingforustoaskhowJesus’steachingappliestous;itisquiteanothertoaskwhatitmeantinitsoriginalcontext.WemustkeepinmindthatJesuswasansweringquestionsposedbyhisdisciples,questionsaboutwhenhispreviousutteranceswouldbefulfilled.Hiswordsweredirectedtothem.“Takeheed,”hesaid,“thatnoonedeceivesyou.”Hetoldhisdisciplesthattheywouldhearofwarsandrumorsofwars,andsoforth.ThecalamitiesJesusenumerates,includingfamines,pestilences,earthquakes,
andwars,aredescribedas“thebeginningofsorrows.”Immediatelyfollowing
thishesaidthatthedisciples(you)wouldbedelivereduptoaffliction,tobehatedandkilled.AgainthepreteristviewofRusselllinksthesecalamitiestoeventsthatactuallytookplaceintheinterimbetweenChrist’sresurrectionandJerusalem’sdestruction.
...InAlexandria,inSeleucia,inSyria,inBabylonia,therewereviolenttumultsbetweentheJewsandtheGreeks,theJewsandtheSyrians,inhabitingthesamecities....InthereignofCaligulagreatapprehensionswereentertainedinJudeaofwarwiththeRomans,inconsequenceofthattyrant’sproposaltoplacehisstatueinthetemple.InthereignoftheEmperorClaudius(AD41–54),therewerefourseasonsofgreatscarcity.Inthefourthyearofhisreign,thefamineinJudeawassosevere,thatthepriceoffoodbecameenormousandgreatnumbersperished.EarthquakesoccurredineachofthereignsofCaligulaandClaudius.Suchcalamities,theLordgavehisdisciplestounderstand,wouldprecedethe“end.”Buttheywere
notitsimmediateantecedents.Theywerethe“beginningoftheend”;but“theendisnotyet.”8
Jesusdescribedtheseeventsas“thebeginningofsufferings.”W.F.AlbrightandC.S.Manncommentonthisphrase:“Literally,the‘beginningsofbirth-pains,’analmosttechnicaltermforthesufferingswhichwouldimmediatelyprecedeanewage....TheageoftheMessiah’sreign,seeninthecontextoftheupheavalswhichsurroundedthespreadofthecommunity,wascertainlyusheredinwithmuchsuffering.”9InsimilarfashionWilliamL.Lanenotes:“ToexpressthisfactJesususeda
phrasewhichbecametechnicalinrabbinicliteraturetodescribetheperiodofintensesufferingprecedingmessianicdeliverance,‘thebirthpangs(oftheMessiah).’IntheOldTestamentthepangsofbirtharearecurringimageofdivinejudgment....”10Theyarementionedinthecontextofhisanswertothedisciples’question
concerningwhenJesus’sprophecieswouldbefulfilled.Russellarguescorrectlythattheseareprecursorsoffulfillment,thingsthatwillhappenbeforeJesus’swordsarefulfilled.IfthisprophecyincludesthepredictionofJerusalem’sdestruction,thenthenaturalmeaningofhiswordsisthatthesethingsmusttakeplacebeforeJerusalemandthetemplearedestroyed.PerhapsthemostcrucialquestionregardingJesus’swordsisthis:Whatdoes
Jesusmeanbytheend?Theendofwhat?IsJesusspeakingoftheendofthetemple?Theendoftheworld?Theendoftheage?Ishespeakingoftheendofoneofthesethings?Someofthesethings?Orallthethingsincorporatedinhisprophecy?
AWitnesstoAllNationsMatthewthenreportsmoreofthediscourse:“Andthisgospelofthekingdomwillbepreached
inalltheworldasawitnesstoallthenations,andthentheendwillcome”(Matt.24:14).
Jesuscitesanotherphenomenonthatmusttakeplacebefore“theend”comes:Thegospelwillbepreachedinalltheworld.This“sign”iswidelyregardedtodayasbeingunfulfilled,asthereremainremotetribesandpeopleswhohavenotyetheardthegospel.Russellargues,however,thatthisprecursortotheendwasalready
accomplishedinapostolictimes:“Oneother‘sign’wastoprecedeandusherintheconsummation,”writesRussell.‘Thegospelofthekingdomshallbepreachedinalltheworld(oikoumenē)forawitnessuntoallnations:andthenshalltheendcome.’Wehavealreadyadverted[oralluded]tothefulfillmentofthispredictionwithintheapostolicage.WehavetheauthorityofSt.PaulforsuchauniversaldiffusionofthegospelinhisdaysastoverifythesayingofourLord.(SeeCol.1:6,23.)ButforthisexplicittestimonyfromanapostleitwouldhavebeenimpossibletopersuadesomeexpositorsthatourLord’swordshadbeeninanysensefulfilledprevioustothedestructionofJerusalem.”11Thepassageinquestionreadsasfollows:“[Thegospel]hascometoyou,asit
hasalsoinalltheworld,andisbringingforthfruit,asitisalsoamongyousincethedayyouheardandknewthegraceofGodintruth...ifindeedyoucontinueinthefaith,groundedandsteadfast,andarenotmovedawayfromthehopeofthegospelwhichyouheard,whichwaspreachedtoeverycreatureunderheaven,ofwhichI,Paul,becameaminister”(Col.1:6,23).RusselllinksthisstatementwithJesus’searlierprediction:Hereitmaybe
propertocalltomindthenoteoftime,givenonapreviousoccasiontothedisciplesasindicativeofourLord’scoming:“VerilyIsayuntoyou,YeshallnothavegoneoverthecitiesofIsrael,tilltheSonofmanbecome”(Matt.10:23).Comparingthisdeclarationwiththepredictionbeforeus(Matt.24:14),wemayseetheperfectconsistencyofthetwostatements,andalsothe“terminusadquem”inboth.IntheonecaseitistheevangelisationofthelandofIsrael,intheother,theevangelisationoftheRomanempirethatisreferredtoastheprecursoroftheParousia.Bothstatementsaretrue....Thewidediffusionofthegospel,bothinthelandofIsraelandthroughouttheRomanempire,issufficienttojustifythepredictionofourLord.12
ThoughRusselllinksthiscomingoftheSonofManwiththeparousia,otherscholars,suchasAlbrightandMann,seeitasbeingfulfilledwiththeresurrectionofChrist,divorcingitfromthesecondcoming,orparousia,ofJesus.
TheAbominationofDesolationThefollowingsectionoftheOlivetDiscourseconcernsthemanifestationoftheabominationofdesolation:“Thereforewhenyouseethe‘abominationofdesolation,’spokenofbyDanieltheprophet,standingintheholyplace”(whoeverreads,lethimunderstand),“thenletthosewhoareinJudeafleetothemountains.Lethimwhoisonthehousetopnotcomedowntotakeanythingoutofhishouse.Andlethimwhoisinthefieldnotgobacktogethisclothes.Butwoetothosewhoarepregnantandtothosewithnursingbabiesinthosedays!AndpraythatyourflightmaynotbeinwinterorontheSabbath.Forthentherewillbegreattribulation,suchashasnotbeensincethebeginningoftheworlduntilthistime,no,norevershallbe.Andunlessthosedayswereshortened,nofleshwouldbesaved;butfortheelect’ssakethosedayswillbeshortened”(Matt.24:15–22).
Thissegmentofthediscourseiswidelyunderstoodtodaytorefertoaneventthathasnotyettranspired,aneventpopularlydescribedasthegreattribulation.Ithasgivenrisetoamultitudeofinterpretations,particularlywithindispensationaltheologyregardingthetimeoftherapture,whetheritisbeforethetribulation,inthemiddleofit,orafterit.Wewillexaminethequestionoftherapturelater.Forthepresentwemerelynoteinpassingthatahostofcontroversialeschatologicaltheoriescomeintoplaywithrespecttothistext.Thepreteristviewincludesthetribulationandtheabominationofdesolation
withsignsthattakeplacepriortothedestructionofJerusalem.“NoargumentisrequiredtoprovethestrictandexclusivereferenceofthissectiontoJerusalemandJudea,”Russellcontends.“Herewecandetectnotraceofadoublemeaning,ofprimaryandulteriorfulfillments,ofunderlyingandtypicalsenses.Everythingisnational,local,andnear:‘theland’isthelandofJudea—‘thispeople’isthepeopleofIsrael—andthe‘time’thelifetimeofthedisciples—‘WhenYEthereforeshallsee.’”13Russellgoesontoargueforafirst-centuryfulfillmentofthisprophecy:“Most
expositorsfindanallusiontothestandardsoftheRomanlegionsintheexpression,‘theabominationofdesolation,’andtheexplanationishighlyprobable.Theeaglesweretheobjectsofreligiousworshiptothesoldiers;and
theparallelpassageinSt.Lukeisallbutconclusiveevidencethatthisisthetruemeaning.WeknowfromJosephusthattheattemptofaRomangeneral(Vitellius),inthereignofTiberius,tomarchhistroopsthroughJudeawasresistedbytheJewishauthorities,onthegroundthattheidolatrousimagesontheirensignswouldbeaprofanationofthelaw.”14AlbrightandMannprovidethefollowingnotetothetextofMatthew24:15:
Matthew’straditionheremakesexplicitwhatisonlyhintedatinMark,whodoesnotmentionthepropheticoracle.Inaddition,Matthewspeaksoftheholyplaceandsoemphaticallyreferstothetemple.ThequotationisfromDaniel9:27.Cf.theidolaltarof1Maccabees1:54,59.WiththeexampleofAntiochusEpiphanesinmind,JesusrequiredneitherpresciencenorunusualinsighttoseewheretheriseofnationalismunderRomanoccupationwouldlead.Whethertheabominablesacrilegereferstoactualidolatry,ortotheentranceofRomanimperial-eaglestandardsintothetemplearea,isimmaterial.Itwascommonpracticethenandforlongcenturiesbefore,toassertsovereigntyoveranationbydethroningitsgodsandreplacingthembythoseoftheconqueror.15
JohnCalvinwritesconcerningthispassage:BecausethedestructionofthetempleandcityofJerusalem,togetherwiththeoverthrowofthewholeJewishgovernment,was(aswehavealreadysaid)athingincredible,andbecauseitmightbethoughtstrange,thatthedisciplescouldnotbesavedwithoutbeingtornfromthatnation,towhichhadbeencommittedtheadoptionandthecovenant(Rom.9:4)ofeternalsalvation,ChristconfirmsbothbythetestimonyofDaniel.Asifhehadsaid,ThatyoumaynotbetoostronglyattachedtothetempleandtotheceremoniesoftheLaw,Godhaslimitedthemtoafixedtime,andhaslongagodeclared,thatwhentheRedeemershouldcome,sacrificeswouldcease;andthatitmaynotgiveyouuneasinesstobecutofffromyourownnation,Godhasalsoforewarnedhispeople,thatinduetimeitwouldberejected.16
RussellthencommentsonthefollowingportionofMatthew’stext:“Thenifanyonesaystoyou,‘Look,hereistheChrist!’or‘There!’donotbelieveit.Forfalsechristsandfalseprophetswillariseandshowgreatsignsandwonders,soastodeceive,ifpossible,eventheelect.See,Ihavetoldyoubeforehand.Thereforeiftheysaytoyou,‘Look,heisinthedesert!’donotgoout;or‘Look,heisintheinnerrooms!’donotbelieveit.Forasthelightningcomesfromtheeastandflashestothewest,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe.Forwhereverthecarcassis,theretheeagleswillbegatheredtogether”(Matt.24:23–28).
Russellmaintainsthatthetextfollowsinunbrokencontinuityfromwhathasprecededit.
Theveryfirstwordisindicativeofcontinuity—“Then”[tote];andeverysucceedingwordisplainlyaddressedtothedisciplesthemselves,fortheirpersonalwarningandguidance.ItisclearthatourLordgivesthemintimationofwhatwouldshortlycometopass,oratleastwhattheymightlivetowitnesswiththeirowneyes.ItisavividrepresentationofwhatactuallyoccurredinthelastdaysoftheJewishcommonwealth....TheJewishhistorian[Josephus]states:“Ofsogreatamultitude,notoneescaped.Theirdestructionwascausedbyafalseprophet,whohadonthatdayproclaimedtothoseremaininginthecity,that‘Godcommandedthemtogouptothetemple,theretoreceivethesignsoftheirdeliverance.’”17
RussellarguesthatthecarcasswheretheeagleswillbegatheredreferstotheguiltyanddevotedchildrenofIsraelwhowillbedestroyedbytheRomanlegions.ThecarcassisIsrael,andtheeaglesareRome.
TheAppearingoftheSonCrucialtoRussell’sviewisthelinkbetweenMatthew24:28andthefollowingversesthatdescribethesignsoftheappearingoftheSonofManincloudsofglory:Immediatelyafterthetribulationofthosedaysthesunwillbedarkened,andthemoonwillnotgiveitslight;thestarswillfallfromheaven,andthepowersoftheheavenswillbeshaken.ThenthesignoftheSonofManwillappearinheaven,andthenallthetribesoftheearthwillmourn,andtheywillseetheSonofMancomingonthecloudsofheavenwithpowerandgreatglory.Andhewillsendhisangelswithagreatsoundofatrumpet,andtheywillgathertogetherhiselectfromthefourwinds,fromoneendofheaventotheother(Matt.24:29–31).
Thispassagedescribestheparousiainvividandgraphicimagesofastronomicalperturbations.Itspeaksofsignsintheskythatwillbevisibleandthesoundofatrumpetthatwillbeaudible.PerhapsnoportionoftheOlivetDiscourseprovidesmoredifficultiestothepreteristviewthanthisone.ThisportionleadsmanyinterpreterstoseeaclearhistoricaldivisionbetweenreferencestothedestructionofJerusalemandreferencestotheparousiaofChrist.TheseinterpretersgrantthatthedestructionofthetempleandJerusalemtookplacewithinthetime-frameofonegeneration,butinsistthatChristhasyet
toappearincloudsofglory.Thisistrueofinterpretersfromboththeliberalandtheconservativeendsofthetheologicalspectrum.ForthepreterismofRussellandotherstowork,theymustgiveacredibleexplanationforhowtheseversesfitintothetime-frameofthefirstcentury.BecauseMatthew24:29–31beginswiththeadverbimmediately,Russell
insiststhatthislinksthetribulation(inMatt.24:15–22)toanear-at-handmanifestationofChristinglory.Russellseesnopossibilityofanygreatintervaloftimebetweenthesetwoevents.Toarguethatthesecondeventoccurredinthefirstcentury,RussellmustdemonstratethatthetribulationreferstothecalamitysufferedbytheJewsduringthedestructionofJerusalem.Russellsays:
Butthesceneofthe“greattribulation”isundeniablyJerusalemandJudea(vv.15,16);sothatnobreakinthesubjectofthediscourseisallowable.Again,inv.30,wereadthat“allthetribesoftheland[pasaihaiphulaitēsgēs]shallmourn,”referringevidentlytothepopulationofthelandofJudea;andnothingcanbemoreforcedandunnaturalthantomakeitinclude,as[JohnPeter]Langedoes,“alltheracesandpeoples”oftheglobe.Therestrictedsenseofthewordgē[=land]intheNewTestamentiscommon;andwhenconnected,asitishere,withtheword“tribes”[phulai],itslimitationtothelandofIsraelisobvious.ThisistheviewadoptedbyDr.[George]CampbellandMosesStuart,anditisindeedself-evident.18
Manycommentatorsstronglydisagreewiththisassessmentofthetext.Tothemthemeaningofthereferenceisnotsoself-evident.Calvin,forexample,saidthat“thetribulationofthosedaysisimproperlyinterpretedbysomecommentatorstomeanthedestructionofJerusalem.”19Others,suchasA.W.Argyle,seetheconnectionbetweenthistextandthetextofZechariah12:10butgiveitawidermeaningthanthetribesofIsrael.20Thegraphicimageryoftheeventsaccompanyingtheparousiafunctionasthe
chiefreasonwhymany,ifnotmost,commentatorsviewthissegmentofthediscourseasbeingnotyetfulfilled.Russellwaswellawareofthis.
But,itisanswered,thecharacterofourLord’slanguageinthispassagenecessitatesitsapplicationtoagrandandawfulcatastrophewhichisstillfuture,andcanbeproperlyunderstoodofnothinglessthanthetotaldissolutionofthefabricoftheuniverse,andtheendofallthings.Howcananyonepretend,itissaid,thatthesunhasbeendarkened,thatthemoonhaswithdrawnherlight,thatthestarshavefallenfromheaven,thattheSonofmanhasbeenseencominginthecloudsofheavenwithpowerandgreatglory?DidsuchphenomenaoccuratthedestructionofJerusalem,orcantheyapplytoanythingelsethanthefinalconsummationofallthings?21
ThequestionsRussellanticipatesareexacerbatedwhenoneconsidersotherNewTestamenttextsthatrefertotheparousiaofChrist.OnesuchtextisfoundinthebookofActs:“Nowwhenhehadspokenthesethings,whiletheywatched,hewastakenup,andacloudreceivedhimoutoftheirsight.Andwhilethey
lookedsteadfastlytowardheavenashewentup,behold,twomenstoodbytheminwhiteapparel,whoalsosaid,‘MenofGalilee,whydoyoustandgazingupintoheaven?ThissameJesus,whowastakenupfromyouintoheaven,willsocomeinlikemannerasyousawhimgointoheaven’”(Acts1:9–11).Luke’srecordoftheascensionofChristmakesitclearthatforthedisciples
presentitwasavisualexperience.TheywatchedChristashewastakenupinthecloud.Theyremainedtransfixedbythesight,gazingupintoheaven.Whentheangelsappeared,theydeclaredthatJesuswouldcomeinlikemannerashehaddepartedfromthem.Thiswouldseemtoindicatethat,ifhisdepartureintheglorycloudwasvisible,thenhisreturnintheglorycloudwouldalsobevisible.Christ’sascensioncannotberegardedasaspiritualormysticalvisionwithoutdoingradicalviolencetothetext.Russellrespondsbyappealingtotheliterarynatureofprophecy.
...Symbolandmetaphorbelongtothegrammarofprophecy,aseveryreaderoftheOldTestamentprophetsmustknow.IsitnotreasonablethatthedoomofJerusalemshouldbedepictedinlanguageasglowingandrhetoricalasthedestructionofBabylon,orBozrah,orTyre?HowthendoestheprophetIsaiahdescribethedownfallofBabylon?“BeholdthedayoftheLordcometh,cruelbothwithwrathandfierceanger,tolaythelanddesolate:
andheshalldestroythesinnersthereofoutofit.Forthestarsofheavenandtheconstellationsthereofshallnotgivetheirlight:thesunshallbedarkenedinhisgoingforth,andthemoonshallnotcauseherlighttoshine....Iwillshaketheheavens,andtheearthshallremoveoutofherplace”(Isa.13:9,10,13).22
TheimageryemployedbyIsaiahisstrikinginitsparalleltothatofthelanguageusedbyJesusintheOlivetDiscourse.ThisisoneofthestrongestpointsofRussell’sargument.HecontinuesbycitingotherOldTestamentpassagesthatemploythesametypeofimagery:...TheprophetIsaiahannouncesthedesolationofBozrah,thecapitalofEdom,inthefollowinglanguage:“Themountainsshallbemeltedwiththebloodoftheslain....Allthehostofheavenshallbedissolved,andtheheavensshallberolledtogetherasascroll:andalltheirhostshallfalldown,astheleaffallethofffromthevine,andasafallingfigfromthefig-tree.Formyswordshallbebathedinheaven:beholditshallcomedownuponIdumea...”(Isa.34:3–5).
HereagainwehavetheveryimageryusedbyourLordinhispropheticdiscourse;andifthefateofBozrahmightproperlybedescribedinlanguagesolofty,whyshoulditbethoughtextravaganttoemploysimilartermsindescribingthefateofJerusalem?23
AtthispointwecannotaccuseRussellofdeviatingfromtheclassicalReformedhermeneuticthatrequiresustointerpretScripturebyScripture.Thisisaclearapplicationoftheanalogyoffaith.
ThoughCalvindoesnotapplythisimagerytothefallofJerusalem,hedoesacknowledgethatthislanguageispoetic:Inwhatmannerthesunwillbedarkenedwecannotnowconjecture,buttheeventwillshow.Hedoesnotindeedmeanthatthestarswillactuallyfall,butaccordingtotheapprehensionofmen;andaccordinglyLukeonlypredictsthattherewillbeSIGNSinthesun,andinthemoon,andinthestars.Themeaningthereforeis,thattherewillbesuchaviolentcommotionofthefirmamentofheaven,thatthestarsthemselveswillbesupposedtofall.Lukealsoaddsthattherewillbeadreadfulcommotionofthesea,theseaandthewavesroaring,sothatmenwillfaintthroughfearandalarm.Inaword,allthecreaturesaboveandbelowwillbe,asitwere,heraldstosummonmentothattribunal,whichtheywillcontinuetotreatwithungodlyandwantoncontempttillthelastday.24
RussellandCalvinagreethatthelanguageemployedinbiblicalprophecyisnotalwayscoldandlogicalasiscommonintheWesternworld,butadoptsakindoffervorcommontotheEast.ScripturecommonlydescribesthevisitationofGod’sjudgmentwithimagesofconvulsionandcataclysms.“Theconclusionthentowhichweareirresistiblyled,”Russelladds,“is,thattheimageryemployedbyourLordinthispropheticdiscourseisnotinappropriatetothedissolutionoftheJewishstateandpolitywhichtookplaceatthedestructionofJerusalem.Itisappropriate,bothasitisinkeepingwiththeacknowledgedstyleoftheancientprophets,andalsobecausethemoralgrandeuroftheeventissuchastojustifytheuseofsuchlanguageinthisparticularcase.”25ItremainstobeseenhowRusselldealswiththetextinActs,thelanguageof
whichisnotsosteepedinsuchcataclysmicterms.“Theexpression‘inlikemanner’mustnotbepressedtoofar,”writesRussell.“ThereareobviouspointsofdifferencebetweenthemanneroftheAscensionandtheParousia.Hedepartedalone,andwithoutvisiblesplendour;hewastoreturninglorywithhisangels.Thewords,however,implythathiscomingwastobevisibleandpersonal,whichwouldexcludetheinterpretationwhichregardsitasprovidential,orspiritual.ThevisibilityoftheParousiaissupportedbytheuniformteachingoftheapostlesandthebeliefoftheearlyChristians:‘Everyeyeshallseehim’”(Rev.1:7).26Russell’streatmentofthistextissomewhatterseandlessthansatisfying.
Thoughhedoesnotwishtopushthetexttoofar,itseemstomehehardlypushesitatall.HesaysJesusdeparted“withoutvisiblesplendor.”Whatwerethedisciplesgazingat?ThatJesusascendedinacloudsuggeststhepresenceoftheShekina,whichismanifestgloryandsplendor.RussellarguesthatJesus’sreturnwouldbewithgloryandwithhisangelsandthatthiswouldbenotably
differentfromhisascension.YetJesus’sascensionwasattendedbybothgloryandangels.Russellacknowledgesthatintherecordoftheascensionthereisnoreference
tothetimeofJesus’sreturn.ButhecontendsthatsincetheannouncementofJesus’sreturnwasmadetothedisciples,theycouldreasonablyassumethathewouldreturntotheminthisworldandthattheywouldseehimina“littlewhile.”RussellbelievesthisiswhythedisciplesreturnedtoJerusalemingreatjoydespitethefactthatJesushadjustbeentakenfromtheirmidst.
TheParableoftheFigTreeTheOlivetDiscoursecontinueswiththeparableofthefigtree:“Nowlearnthisparablefromthefigtree:Whenitsbranchhasalreadybecometenderandputsforthleaves,youknowthatsummerisnear.Soyoualso,whenyouseeallthesethings,knowthatitisnear,attheverydoors”(Matt.24:32–33).
Beforeutteringthemostcontroversialportionofthediscourse,thereferencetothepresentgenerationthatwillnotpassaway,Jesusgivesthebriefparableofthefigtree.Russellbelievesthisparablefunctionsasaprefatorystatementtothereferenceto“thisgeneration.”
But,asiftoprecludeeventhepossibilityofmisconceptionormistake,ourLordinthenextparagraphdrawsaroundhisprophecyalinesoplainandpalpable,shuttingitwhollywithinalimitsodefiniteanddistinct,thatitoughttobedecisiveofthewholequestion....Wordshavenomeaningifthislanguage,utteredonsosolemnanoccasion,andsopreciseand
expressinitsimport,doesnotaffirmthenearapproachofthegreateventwhichoccupiesthewholediscourseofourLord.Firsttheparableofthefig-treeintimatesthatasthebudsonthetreesbetokenthenearapproachofsummer,sothesignswhichhehadjustspecifiedwouldbetokenthatthepredictedconsummationwasathand.They,thedisciplestowhomhewasspeaking,weretoseethem,andwhentheysawthemtorecognisethattheendwas“near,evenatthedoors.”27
GaryDeMarnotesthatsomeinterpretersofthisparable,mostnotablyDispensationalists,thinkitpointsforwardtotheJewsreturningtoPalestineandbecominganationagain.Hedisagrees,pointingoutthatthereisnomentionintheentireNewTestamentofIsrael’sbecominganationagain.HeagreeswithRussellthattheparableislinkedtothefollowingpassage,thatJesuswouldcomewithinagenerationtodestroythetempleandJerusalem.28ThoughwehavenotyetreachedtheendoftheOlivetDiscourse,Iwill
concludethischapteratthisjuncturesowemayexploremorefullyinthenext
chapterthemeaningofJesus’sstatementthat“thisgenerationshallnotpassaway”(Matt.24:34).WecansummarizethepositionofRussellandmoderatepreterismtothispointasfollows:
1. TheOlivetDiscoursecontainsacontinuousandhomogeneousprophecyregardingthecomingdestructionofJerusalemandthetemple,andtheparousiaofChrist.
2. Severalsignswillportendtheseevents:theappearanceoffalsechristsandfalseprophets,greatsocialdisturbances,naturalcalamitiesandconvulsions,thepersecutionoftheapostles,theapostasyofprofessedbelievers,andthepublicationofthegospelthroughouttheRomanEmpire.
3. ThegreattribulationreferstothesiegeofJerusalem.4. TheOlivetDiscourseisnotabouttheendoftheworldbutaboutthe
endofadefinitetimeperiod,the“ageoftheJews”ortheJewishdispensation.
5. ThegraphiclanguageusedbyJesustodescribetheattendingeventsismetaphoricalandconsistentwiththepoetryoffervorusedbyOldTestamentprophets.
2WHAT“GENERATION”WILLWITNESS
THEEND?
Thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingsarefulfilled.
Matthew24:34
AsImentionedintheintroduction,theskepticismofBertrandRussellandthe“consistenteschatology”ofJohannesWeissandAlbertSchweitzeraredirectlytiedtothetime-framereferenceoftheOlivetDiscourse.Thecrisisof“parousia-delay”eschatologyhasbeenfosteredinlargemeasurebythisproblem.Perhapsnootherproblemhasspurredtherevivalofdifferentstrandsofpreterismandrealizedeschatologymorethanhasthisone.TheOlivetDiscourseincludesthefollowing:...Assuredly,Isaytoyou,this
generationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingsarefulfilled.Heavenandearthwillpassaway,butMywordswillbynomeanspassaway.
Butofthatdayandhournooneknows,no,noteventheangelsofheaven,butMyFatheronly.ButasthedaysofNoahwere,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe.Forasinthedaysbeforetheflood,theywereeatinganddrinking,marryingandgivinginmarriage,untilthedaythatNoahenteredtheark,anddidnotknowuntilthefloodcameandtookthemallaway,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe...(Matt.24:34–39).
BeforeweexaminethepreteristviewofthisportionoftheOlivetDiscourse,wewillmakeareconnaissanceofvariousinterpretationsofthetime-framereferenceregarding“thisgeneration.”DavidHillcommentsonverse34:Thisverserecalls16:28,andaffirmsthat
someofthediscipleswouldlivetoseetheParousia.Thiswouldpresupposea
relativelyearlydatefortheevent,whereasv.36defiesallattemptstogiveaprecisechronology.
WasJesusinerrorinhispredictionofthenearnessoftheEnd,ifthissayingisregardedasauthentic?Attemptstoexplainthisdifficultyincludethearguments:(a)thatthereferenceisnottotheEnd,buttotheFallofJerusalem.Butarenottheaccompanyingwordsin35–36toosolemntorefersimplytosomespecifichistoricalevent?(b)that“thisgeneration”indicates“thepeopleofGod”whichwillsurvivetilltheendoftime.Itisprobablethatwehavehereanexampleofthat“shorteningofhistoricalperspective”whichissofrequentintheprophets.1
ItisinterestingthatHillseesverses35–36asbasicallyrulingouttheideathatthispassagereferstoJerusalem’sdestruction.Becausethedayandhourarenotknowndoesnotprecludetheapplicationofatime-frameaslengthyasahumangeneration.Someone,forexample,couldpredictthataneventwilltakeplaceinthenextfortyyears,andthenqualifythepredictionbysaying“Idon’tknowtheparticulardayorhour”withinthatspanoftime.Hill’sappealtothephenomenonofhistorical-perspectiveforeshorteningislikewiseproblematicwhenwerememberthatJesuswasansweringadirectquestionfromhisdisciplesregardingthe“when”ofhisprophecy.Thephrase“thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassaway”(Matt.24:34)is
repeatedinalmostidenticallanguageintheaccountsofMarkandLuke(seeappendix2).FirstwenoticethatJesusmadethisstatementtohisdiscipleswhowerealiveandpresentwithhimatthetime.TheyweretheprimaryaudienceJesuswasaddressing.IndeedsubsequentgenerationsofChristiansareincludedbywayofextensionintheaudienceofallofJesus’swords.Butitisdangerouseithertoexcludefromconsiderationtheoriginalaudienceortorelegatethemtoalevelofsecondaryimportance.J.StuartRussellarguesthat99personsinevery100wouldimmediately
understandJesustomeanthattheeventshewaspredictingwouldfallwithinthelimitsofthelifetimeofanexistinggeneration.Thismeans,notthateverypersonpresentwillnecessarilybealiveatthetimeofthefulfillment,butthatmanyorevenmostwillbe.
AnotherPredictionbyJesusThisimmediatelycallsattentiontoanotherofJesus’stime-framereferencesintheGospels:“FortheSonofManwillcomeinthegloryofhisFatherwithhisangels,andthenhewillrewardeachaccordingtohisworks.Assuredly,Isaytoyou,therearesomestandinghere
whoshallnottastedeathtilltheyseetheSonofMancominginhiskingdom”(Matt.16:27–28).
MatthewdeclaresthatsomewhowereinChrist’simmediatepresenceashewasspeaking(“somestandinghere”)wouldnot“tastedeath”beforetheywould“seetheSonofMancominginhiskingdom.”ThetermcomingthatappearsintheGreektextofMatthew16:28isnotthewordparousia.Nevertheless,Jesusdoesspeakofa“coming”oftheSonofMan.Theexpression“shallnottastedeath”clearlyreferstodying,sowemayrenderthetexttomeanthatsomewhowerehearingJesus’swordsonthisoccasionwouldnotdiebeforewitnessingsomekindofcomingofJesus.MatthewspeaksofthecomingofChrist“inhiskingdom.”Markspeaksof
theirseeingthekingdomofGodcome“withpower”(9:1),andLukesimplysaysthattheywillseethekingdomofGod(9:27).
TwoPredictionsbyJesus
Matthew16:28TherearesomestandingherewhoshallnottastedeathtilltheyseetheSonofMancominginhis
kingdom.
Matthew24:34Thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingsarefulfilled.
Thequestionthen,withrespecttothesetexts,isthis:Whatwillthedisciplesobservebeforeallofthemdie?TheSynopticGospelslinkthiscomingoftheSonofManwithsomemanifestationofthekingdomofGod.Manycommentatorsseethismanifestationinvariouscriticalmomentsofredemptivehistory,suchasChrist’sresurrection,hisascension,orPentecost,allofwhichprovidesomeoutwardmanifestationofthekinglygloryofChrist.Manyspecifythetransfiguration,wherethecominggloryofJesusismademanifesttemporarily.WilliamL.Laneremarks:“Thetransfigurationwasamomentary,butreal
(andwitnessed)manifestationofJesus’ssovereignpowerwhichpointedbeyonditselftotheparousia,whenhewillcomewith‘powerandglory’(Mark13:26).ThefulfillmentofJesus’spromiseashorttimeafterthetransfiguration(Mark9:2)providedencouragementtotheharassedChristiansinRomeandelsewhere
thattheircommitmenttoJesusandthegospelwasvalid.”LanecitesJ.Schiersetoconfirmthelinkbetweenthetransfigurationandtheparousia.Thetwoeventsarebynomeansidentical,buttheformerbearswitnesstothelatter.2Thateventslikethetransfigurationandresurrectionaremanifestationsofthe
comingofGod’skingdomishardlyindisputeamongmostNewTestamentscholars.Theonlyproblemwiththislinkageisthetime-framereference.Inthiscase,however,itisnotthatthetime-frameistooremoteortemporallydisconnectedfromtheprediction.Ratheritisthatthetime-framereferenceistoonear.InMark’sGospeltheaccountofthetransfigurationissetintheverynextverse,andthisversebeginswithaspecifictimereference:“Aftersixdays...”(9:2).IfJesus’spredictiontothedisciplesisfulfilledwithinoneweek(orafewweeks,ifthepredictionreferstotheresurrection,ascension,orPentecost),whywouldhespecifythattheseeventswilloccurbefore“some[ofthem]standinghere...will...tastedeath”[9:1]?ItseemsstrangethatJesuswouldsay,“Someofyouwillnotdiethisweek.”OnecouldconceivablyarguethatJesusdidnotknowthis“coming”would
occursorapidly,thatheknewonlythatitwouldoccurbeforeallofhisdisciplesdied.Heobviouslyhadsomeideaofthetimespaninwhichhispredictionwouldbefulfilled.Thatmustbethecasetowarranthissayingthatitwouldoccurbeforeallofhisdisciplesdied.Butifthepredictioncametopassinjustsixdays,thiswouldindicateonJesus’spartaradicalmisconceptionoftheamountoftimethatwouldelapsebeforetheprophecywasfulfilled.ThisdoesnotmeanthatLane’sandothers’interpretationthatthisprophecyreferstothetransfigurationisimpossible.Itdoessuggest,however,thatitisunlikely.IfJesushadinviewthedestructionofJerusalem,itwouldmakemoresenseforhimtolocatethetime-framewithinaperiodofseveralyearsthanwithinafewdaysorafewweeks.Thetime-frameindicatedbythereferencetosomesurvivingdeathstronglysuggeststhattherewouldbeaninterludeofseveralyearsbetweentheprophecyanditsfulfillment.Theimportanceofthisconsiderationisitsrelationshiptoourunderstandingof
thedisputedtime-framereferenceintheOlivetDiscourse(Matt.24:34)regardingthepassingofageneration.IfJesushadinmindatime-frameofroughlyfortyyears,itcouldalsobesaidthatduringthistime-framesomeofhisdiscipleswouldnottastedeath.IftheOlivetDiscourserefersprimarilytoeventssurroundingthedestructionofJerusalemandifthewordgenerationreferstoaforty-yearperiod,thenitispossible,ifnotprobable,thatJesus’sreferencetohiscominginMatthew16:28referstothesameevents,nottothetransfigurationorotherclose-at-handevents.
WithrespecttoJesus’sremarksinMatthew16,J.StuartRusselltakesastrongposition:Thisremarkabledeclarationisofthegreatestimportanceinthisdiscussion,andmayberegardedasthekeytotherightinterpretationoftheNewTestamentdoctrineoftheParousia.Thoughitcannotbesaidthatthereareanyspecialdifficultiesinthelanguage,ithasgreatlyperplexedthecommentators,whoaremuchdividedintheirexplanations.ItissurelyunnecessarytoaskwhatisthecomingoftheSonofmanherepredicted.TosupposethatitrefersmerelytothegloriousmanifestationofJesusonthemountoftransfiguration,thoughanhypothesiswhichhasgreatnamestosupportit,issopalpablyinadequateasaninterpretationthatitscarcelyrequiresrefutation....
ItisenoughtosaythatsuchaninterpretationofourSaviour’swordscouldneverhaveenteredintothemindsofthosewhoheardthem....HowcouldtheresurrectionofChristbecalled—HiscominginthegloryofhisFather,withtheholyangels,inhiskingdom,andtojudgment?3
RussellalsoarguesthatJesus’smannerofspeakingwouldbettersuitanintervalofthirtyorfortyyears,atime-frameinwhichitwouldbereasonabletoexpectthatsomeofthosepresentwoulddie,butnotall.RussellalsoseesalinktoJesus’sstatementinMatthew10:“Butwhentheypersecuteyouinthiscity,fleetoanother.Forassuredly,Isaytoyou,youwillnothavegonethroughthecitiesofIsraelbeforetheSonofMancomes”(Matt.10:23).“Inthispassage,”writesRussell,“wefindtheearliestdistinctmentionofthat
greateventwhichweshallfindsofrequentlyalludedtohenceforthbyourLordandhisapostles,viz.,hiscomingagain,ortheParousia....Whocandoubtthat‘thecomingoftheSonofman’ishere,whatitiseverywhereelse,theformulabywhichtheParousia,thesecondcomingofChrist,isexpressed?Thisphrasehasadefiniteandconsistentsignification,asmuchashiscrucifixion,orhisresurrection,andadmitsofnootherinterpretationinthisplace.”4Again,ifRusselliscorrectinconcludingthatthecomingreferredtointhis
textistheparousiaofChrist,thentheprimarytime-framefortheparousiamustberestrictedtoaforty-yearperiod.ItsurelydidnottakethedisciplesmuchmorethanfortyyearstocovertheboundariesofPalestinewiththegospelmessage.
TheMeaningof“ThisGeneration”
Thetextswehaveexaminedarerelevanttothecentralquestionwearefacing:Whatismeantbythephrase“thisgenerationwillnotpassaway”intheOlivetDiscourse?Russellarguesthatitsprimafaciemeaningcanonlybeaperiodnolongerthanthelifespanofageneration,whichisthirtytofortyyears.Hesays:Far,however,fromacceptingthisdecisionofourLordasfinal,the
commentatorshaveviolentlyresistedthatwhichseemsthenaturalandcommon-sensemeaningofhiswords.Theyhaveinsistedthatbecausetheeventspredicteddidnotsocometopassinthatgeneration,thereforethewordgeneration(genea)cannotpossiblymean,whatitisusuallyunderstoodtomean,thepeopleofthatparticularageorperiod,thecontemporariesofourLord.Toaffirmthatthesethingsdidnotcometopassistobegthequestion,andsomethingmore.Butwesubmitthatitisthebusinessofgrammariansnottobeapprehensiveofpossibleconsequences,buttosettlethetruemeaningofwords.OurLord’spredictionsmaybesafelylefttotakecareofthemselves;itisforustotrytounderstandthem.5
GaryDeMartakesasimilartackwithrespecttothemeaningofthephrase“thisgeneration”:“ThefuturistinterpretersofMatthew24assertthat‘thisgeneration’doesnotmeanthegenerationtowhomJesuswasspeaking.Rather,itreferstoadistantgenerationaliveatthetimewhentheseeventswilltakeplace.”6IthinkDeMarcommitsabasicerroratthispoint.Futuristsdonottendto
arguethatJesuswasnotspeakingtothatgenerationofhiscontemporaries.Rathertheyarguethatthetermgenerationhererefersnottoaspecifictime-frameoffortyyears,buttoa“kind”or“sort”ofpeople.Someoftheseinterpreterssee“thisgeneration”asadescriptionofbelievers,whileothersseeitasadescriptionofthewicked.Thatis,JesusmaybesayingthatbelieverslikethediscipleswillnotpassfromtheearthbeforeJesusappearsinhisparousia.Thisdoesnotexcludetheoriginaldisciplesfrombeingnumberedamong“thisgeneration.”SimilarlyJesuscouldhavemeantthat,nomatterhowlonghetarriesbeforehisparousia,therewillbepresentgenerationsofwickedpeoplewhowillresistthekingdomofChrist.HermanRidderboschampionssuchaview:Afullerstudyandcloser
examinationofthispassagemay,however,favoradifferentview.Thegreatquestionis,doesJesusmentionaparticularterminaldate,ordoesheonlyspeakofthecertaintyofthethingshehasforetold?Thesuppositionthathemeansacertainterminaldatehereremainsstrikinginconnectionwiththefactthatamomentlaterhesays,“butofthatdayandofthathourknowethnoman”[Matt.24:36].Althoughweneednotspeakofadiscrepancy(as[W.G.]Kümmeldoes)becausewemightexplainthetextbysaying,“butofthedateandtheexactpointoftimenomanknows”;theforceofthispronouncementwouldbeconsiderablyweakenedbythisrestrictionofthefulfillmenttothecontemporarygeneration....Inthiscase,wemustnotattributeatemporalmeaningtothewords“thisgeneration,”butmustconceiveofitintheunfavorablesensein
whichitoccursalsoelsewhere,viz.,thepeopleofthisparticulardispositionandframeofmindwhoareaversetoJesusandhiswords.7
Ridderbosseesthephrase“thisgeneration”asreferringnottoaframeoftimebuttoaframeofmind.HearguesthatJesus’spurposeistounderlinethecertaintyofhiscomingandnotthetimeofit.OneofthechiefproblemswiththisinterpretationisthatJesuswasanswering
notaquestionofcertainty,butaquestionregardingchronology.Thediscipleswerenotaskingifthesethingswouldcometopass.Theywereaskingwhentheywouldcometopass.DeMararguesthattointerpret“thisgeneration”asmeaningsomethingother
thanthegenerationtowhichJesuswasspeakingistointerpretthewordgenerationinamannerthatisalientoitsprimarymeaningintheNewTestament.Hesays:...theuseof“thisgeneration”throughouttheGospelsmakesitclearthatitmeansthegenerationtowhomJesuswasspeaking.Itnevermeans“race,”assomeclaim,orsomefuturegeneration.Theadjectivethispointstothecontemporarynatureofthegeneration.Ifsomefuturegenerationhadbeeninview,Jesuscouldhavechosentheadjectivethat:“That[future]generationwhichbeginswiththebuddingofthefigtree[Israelregatheredtothelandofherfathers]willnotpassawayuntilallthesethingstakeplace.”
...“Ofthethirty-eightappearancesofgeneaapartfromLuke21:32//Matthew24:34//Mark13:30allhavethetemporalmeaning,primarilythatof‘contemporaries.’”8
DeMarthenquotesDavidChilton:“NotoneofthesereferencesisspeakingoftheentireJewishraceoverthousandsofyears;allusethewordinitsnormalsenseofthesumtotalofthoselivingatthesametime.Italwaysreferstocontemporaries.(Infact,thosewhosayitmeans‘race’tendtoacknowledgethisfact,butexplainthatthewordsuddenlychangesitsmeaningwhenJesususesitinMatt.24!)”9Russellarguesinasimilarmanner:Itiscontendedbymanythatinthisplace
thewordgeneashouldberendered‘race,ornation’;andthatourLord’swordsmeannomorethanthattheJewishraceornationshouldnotpassaway,orperish,untilthepredictionswhichhehadjustutteredhadcometopass....Itistrue,nodoubt,thatthewordgenea,likemostothers,hasdifferentshadesofmeaning,andthatsometimes,intheSeptuagintandinclassicauthorsitmayrefertoanationorarace.Butwethinkthatitisdemonstrablewithoutanyshadowofdoubtthattheexpression‘thisgeneration,’sooftenemployedbyourLord,alwaysreferssolelyandexclusivelytohiscontemporaries,theJewishpeopleofhisownperiod.Itmightsafelybelefttothecandidjudgmentofevery
reader,whetheraGreekscholarornot,whetherthisisnotso:butasthepointisoneofgreatimportance,itmaybedesirabletoadducetheproofsofthisassertion.10
Beforewelookattheseproofs,itisimportanttonoteRussell’ssurprisingclaimthattheuniversalmeaningof“thisgeneration”forChristcanbedemonstratedbeyondtheshadowofdoubt.Thisisstartlingbecausealternaterenderingsofthephrasehavebeenofferedbysomeofthemostrespectedscholars.OfcourseRussellisnotsayingthatnodoubtexistsonthematter.Ratherheisclaimingthathisviewisdemonstrablewithoutshadowofdoubt.Whatisindisputeamongscholarsshouldnotbeindispute,Russellcontends,andhepromisestoprovehispointconclusively.Russellmakesacrucialadmission,onethatmakesitallthemoredifficultto
provehispoint.HeadmitsthatgeneaiscapableofvariantshadesofmeaningandthatthereareinstancesintheSeptuagintandclassicalsourceswherethetermmeanssomethingotherthanacontemporarygroupofpeoplewholivewithinadefinitetime-frame.ToprovehispointhemustshowthateverytimeJesususestheterm,itrefers,solelyandexclusively,tohiscontemporaries.
Russell’sCaseLetuslookattheargumentRussellprovidestomakehiscase:
1. InourLord’sfinaladdresstothepeople,deliveredonthesamedayasthisdiscourseontheMountofOlives,hedeclared,“Allthesethingsshallcomeuponthisgeneration”(Matt.23:36).Nocommentatorhaseverproposedtounderstandthisasreferringtoanyotherthantheexistinggeneration.
2. “WhereuntoshallIlikenthisgeneration?”(Matt.11:16).Hereitisadmittedby[JohnPeter]Langeand[Rudolf]Stierthatthewordrefersto“thethenexistinglastgenerationofIsrael.”
3. “Anevilandadulterousgenerationseekethafterasign.”“ThemenofNinevehshallriseupinthejudgmentwiththisgeneration.”“TheQueenoftheSouthshallriseupinthejudgmentwiththisgeneration.”“Evensoshallitbealsountothiswickedgeneration”(Matt.12:39,41,42,45)....Surelythegenerationwhichsoughtafterasignwasthethenexistinggeneration;andcanitbesupposedthatitwasagainstanyothergenerationthanthatwhichhadresistedsuch
preachingasthatofJohntheBaptistandofChristthattheGentilesweretoriseupinthejudgment?ThereisonlyoneinterpretationofourLord’slanguagepossible,anditisthatwhichrefershiswordstohisownperverseandunbelievingcontemporaries.
4. “Thatthebloodofalltheprophets...mayberequiredofthisgeneration.”“Itshallberequiredofthisgeneration”(Luke11:50,51).
5. “Whoevershallbeashamedofmeinthisadulterousandsinfulgeneration”(Mark8:38).
6. “TheSonofmanmustberejectedofthisgeneration”(Luke17:25)....
Thesearealltheexamplesinwhichtheexpression‘thisgeneration’occursinthesayingsofourLord,andtheyestablishbeyondallreasonablequestionthereferenceofthewordsintheimportantdeclarationnowbeforeus....11
Wenoteasubtleshiftfrom“demonstrablewithoutanyshadowofdoubt”to“beyondallreasonablequestion.”Perhapstheshiftismerelystylistic,buttechnicallythereisadifferencebetweenprovingsomethingbeyondashadowofdoubtandprovingitbeyondareasonabledoubt.Weunderstandthisdifferencekeenlyinourmodernjudicialsystem,wherethejuryinacriminaltrialiscalledtoreachaverdictbeyondareasonabledoubt,whichclearlyislessthanbeyondashadowofdoubt.ItisonethingtosaythatRussell’sevidenceis“reasonable,”itisquiteanother
todeclarethatitisrationallycompelling.ThisisespeciallysignificantinthatRussellhassofarofferedamererestatementoftextsinwhichJesusreferstothisgeneration,providinglittlecommentary.RussellseemstoassumethatthemeaningofJesus’swordsinthesetextsisself-evident.Russellseekstobuttresshiscasebyusingtheclassicreductioadabsurdum
formofargument:Butsupposethatweweretoadopttherenderingproposed,andtakegeneaasmeaningarace,whatpointorsignificancewouldtherebeinthepredictionthen?CananyonebelievethattheassertionsosolemnlymadebyourLord,“VerilyIsayuntoyou,”etc.,amountstonomorethanthis,“TheHebrewraceshallnotbecomeextincttillallthesethingsbefulfilled”?ImagineaprophetinourowntimespredictingagreatcatastropheinwhichLondonwouldbedestroyed,St.Paul’sandtheHousesofParliamentleveledwiththeground,andafearfulslaughteroftheinhabitantsbeperpetrated;andthatwhenasked,“Whenshallthesethingscometopass?”heshouldreply,“TheAnglo-Saxonraceshallnotbecomeextincttillallthesethingsbefulfilled”!Wouldthisbea
satisfactoryanswer?Wouldnotsuchananswerbeconsideredderogatorytotheprophet,andanaffronttohishearers?Wouldtheynothavereasontosay,“Itissafeprophesyingwhentheeventisplacedataninterminabledistance!”ButthebaresuppositionofsuchasenseinourLord’spredictionshowsitselftobeareductioadabsurdum.Wasitforthisthatthedisciplesweretowaitandwatch?...Suchahypothesisisitsownrefutation.12
Russell’sargumentappliestotheinterpretationofgenerationas“arace.”Heacknowledgesotherinterpretationsofgenea,suchasagenerationofrighteouspeopleorofwickedpeople,buthebelievesthesealternativesrequirenoconsideration.Hethenproceedstoconsiderhowlongagenerationisusuallythoughttobe,concludingthat,thoughitisindefinite,itfallswithinthelimitsofapproximatelythirtyorfortyyears.HecitesOldTestamentreferencessupportingthisview.HeplacesthedestructionofJerusalemwithinthetime-frameof37yearsaftertheOlivetDiscourse.IdonotagreethatRussellproveshispointbeyondashadowofdoubt.Ido
think,however,thathegivesweightyevidencethatwiththephrase“thisgeneration”JesusreferstohiscontemporariesandthatJesuspointstoadefiniteperiodoftimewithinwhichthisgenerationwoulddie.
AdditionalEvidenceTheentryongeneainGerhardKittel’sTheologicalDictionaryoftheNewTestamentsaysthatingeneralusagegeneameans“birth”or“descent,”butthatitcanalsomean“generation.”TheSeptuagintusesitchieflytomean“‘generation’inthesenseofcontemporaries.”IntheNewTestament,“asapurelyformalconcept[genea]isalwaysqualified,”theentrydeclares.“Itmostlydenotes‘generation’inthesenseofcontemporaries.”13Thephrasethisgeneration“istobeunderstoodtemporally,butthereisalwaysaqualifyingcriticism”(suchas“adulterous,”“evil,”“unbelieving”).14
WilliamL.Laneagreesthatthephrase“thisgeneration”referstothecontemporariesofJesus.“Thesignificanceofthetemporalreferencehasbeendebated,”LanewritesinhiscommentaryonMark,“butinMark‘thisgeneration’clearlydesignatesthecontemporariesofJesus...andthereisno
considerationfromthecontextwhichlendssupporttoanyotherproposal.Jesussolemnlyaffirmsthatthegenerationcontemporarywithhisdiscipleswillwitnessthefulfillmentofhispropheticword,culminatinginthedestructionofJerusalemandthedismantlingoftheTemple.WiththiswordJesusrespondstotheinitialquestionofthedisciplesregardingthetimewhen‘thesethings’willtakeplace.”15Thereseemstobewidespreadagreementthat“thisgeneration”referstothe
contemporariesofJesusandnottosomefuturegroup.ThisviewisheldnotonlybypreteristssuchasJ.StuartRussell,butbycriticssuchasBertrandRussell,theconsistenteschatologyschool,andcontemporaryconservativescholarssuchasLane.Withthismuchsupport,onewonderswhytheOlivetDiscourseisnotseenashavingbeenfulfilledinthefirstcentury.WerememberthatforJ.StuartRussell’scasetohold,itisnecessaryto
concludenotonlythat“thisgeneration”referstoJesus’scontemporaries,butalsothat“allthesethings”includesJesus’sparousia.ToavoidRussell’sconclusion,somehavearguedthat“thisgeneration”meanssomethingotherthanJesus’scontemporariesorthat“allthesethings”refersexclusivelytotheeventssurroundingthedestructionofJerusalem.HermanRidderbosprovidesaninterestingsummaryofthis:Thephrase“all
(these)things,”however,isthengivenalimitinginterpretation.Thus[Seakle]Greijdanus,e.g.,writesthatthis“all”isofcoursenotunlimited;itisnotallthatmusthappentotheworldaccordingtothedivinecounsel,itisnotthewholeofthehistoryoftheworld,butthatwhichourLordannounceswithrespecttothegenerationthathementionshere,thatwhichisespeciallyconcernedwiththatgeneration,soinparticularthatwhichhehasindicatedandforetoldin[Matt.24]vv.20–24,namely,allthedistressthatwastocometotheJewishpeopleofthattimeandthatwoulddestroyandannihilatethem.Inviewofthisopinion,this“ofcourse”inGreijdanusapparentlymeans,“becausethispronouncementwouldotherwisenothavebeenrealized.”Sothisisanexplicatioexeventu.16
Ridderbosgetstothecruxofthematter.Attemptstointerpret“thisgeneration”asreferringtosomethingotherthanJesus’scontemporariesexclusively,ortorestrict“allthesethings”totheeventssurroundingJerusalem’sdestructionaredrivenbyadesiretopreservethebiblicaltextandthewordsofChristfrombeingprovenfalse.Theissueofparousia-delayinconsistenteschatologylurksnotfarbelowthesurface.ThoughRidderbosdoesnotacceptthepreteristview,favoringthe“alreadyandnotyet”hypothesis,heneverthelessarguesagainstrestrictingthephrase“allthesethings”tothedestructionofJerusalem.Hesays:Theremaybesomedoubtastowhetherthephrase“all
(these)things”denotesthewholeofthesigns,aswellastheparousiaoftheSonofMan.Theexpressioninthe33rdverseofMatthew24,“whenyeshallseeallthesethings,knowthatitisnear,evenatthedoors,”wouldseemtofavortheviewthat“allthesethings”referstothesigns.Ontheotherhand,thatwhichfollowsafterMatthew24:34,aswellasthataftertheparalleltextinMark13:30,clearlyreferstotheparousiaalso,“Butofthatdayandofthathourknowethnoman,”etc.Therefore,inouropinion,therigorousrestrictionofthewords“all(these)things”tothesignsalone,withtheexclusionoftheparousiaproper,isnotjustified....Buttoourmind,itisperfectlyarbitrarytorefusetotakethesesignsintoaccountinverses31and32.Thetextexplicitlysays“thesethings”and“all,”bothclearlyreferringtoallthathasgonebefore.Consequently,whateverdifficultiesthesepassagesmayoffer,itisnotpermissible,wethink,togetridofthembymakingarbitraryrestrictionsinthemeaningofthetext.17
Ifboth“thisgeneration”and“allthesethings”aretakenatfacevalue,theneitherallthecontentofJesus’sOlivetDiscourse,includingtheparousiahedescribeshere,havealreadytakenplace(insomesense),oratleastsomeofJesus’sprophecyfailedtotakeplacewithinthetime-frameassignedtoit.Evangelicalscholarshaveoptedforsomeformoftheformeroption,criticalscholarsforthelatter.
QuestionsforPreteristsIfitisagreedthat“allthesethings”describedinthediscoursetookplaceinthefirstcentury,thensomecrucialquestionsremain:(1)Howcanitbesaidthattheyinfactdidtakeplace?And(2)iftheydidtakeplace,whatabouttheChristian’shopeforafuturereturnofJesus?Thesetwoquestionsexerciseenormousinfluenceonthetheoriespresentedinresponse.
HowoneapproachesthecontentsoftheOlivetDiscoursedependslargelyonthehermeneutic(theprinciplesofinterpretation)employed.TheorthodoxProtestanthermeneuticfollowsMartinLuther’sviewofthesensusliteralis.Thereismuchconfusiontodayregardingthe“literalsense”ofScripture.LuthermeansthatoneshouldinterprettheBibleaccordingtothemannerinwhichitwaswritten,orinits“literarysense.”ThiswasanattempttopreventfancifulflightsintosubjectivismbywhichtheScripturesareturnedintoa“waxnose,”twistedandshapedaccordingtotheinterpreter’swhimorbias.Toguardagainst
subjectivism,Luthersoughtarulethatwouldguidetheinterpretertoanobjectiverenderingofthetext.TointerprettheBible“literally”intheclassicalsenserequiresthatwelearnto
recognizeinScripturedifferentgenresofliterature.Poetryistobeinterpretedaspoetry,anddidacticpassagesaretobeinterpretedaccordingtothegrammarofthedidactic.Historicalnarrativemustnotbetreatedasparable,norparableasstricthistoricalnarrative.Muchofbiblicalprophecyiscastinanapocalypticgenrethatemploysgraphicimaginativelanguageandoftenmixeselementsofcommonhistoricalnarrativewiththefigurativelanguageofpoetry.Partoftheconfusionconcerningbiblicalinterpretationstemsfrom
contemporaryusageofthetermliteral.Literaltodayusuallyrefers,nottothetechnicalsenseinwhichLutherusedit,buttotheinterpretationofpoeticimagesandthelikeasstraightforwarddidacticorindicativelanguage.Totakeeverytext“literally”inthissenseisnottointerpretitaccordingtothegenreinwhichitiswritten,buttointerpretitinaplainindicativesense.WhentheOlivetDiscourseissubjectedtosuchawoodenliteralism,thecrisisofparousia-delayiscreated.ThecataclysmiceventssurroundingtheparousiaaspredictedintheOlivetDiscourseobviouslydidnotoccur“literally”inAD70.Someelementsofthediscoursedidtakeplace“literally,”butothersobviouslydidnot.Thisproblemofliteralfulfillmentleavesuswiththreebasicsolutionsto
interpretingtheOlivetDiscourse:
1. Wecaninterprettheentirediscourseliterally.InthiscasewemustconcludethatsomeelementsofJesus’sprophecyfailedtocometopass,asadvocatesof“consistenteschatology”maintain.
2. Wecaninterprettheeventssurroundingthepredictedparousialiterallyandinterpretthetime-framereferencesfiguratively.Thismethodisemployedchieflybythosewhodonotrestrictthephrase“thisgenerationwillnotpassaway...”tothelifespanofJesus’scontemporaries.
3. Wecaninterpretthetime-framereferencesliterallyandtheeventssurroundingtheparousiafiguratively.Inthisview,allofJesus’spropheciesintheOlivetDiscoursewerefulfilledduringtheperiodbetweenthediscourseitselfandthedestructionofJerusaleminAD70.
Thethirdoptionisfollowedbypreterists.Thestrengthofthepreteristpositionisfoundpreciselyinthishermeneuticalmethod.Whenfacedwiththeoptionofinterpretingthetime-framereferencesliterallyorinterpretingthedescriptionof
theparousialiterally,thepreteristchoosestheformer.Thepreterist’schoiceisgovernedbyalargerhermeneuticalprinciple,namelytheprincipleofinterpretingScripturebyScripture(analogiafide).AsRussellhasshown,thereismuchbiblicalprecedentforinterpretingfigurativelyreferencestoastronomicalupheavalsinbiblicalpropheciesofcatastrophicevents.Ontheotherhand,thetime-framereferencesarenotclothedinsuchimagery,butareexpressedinstraightforward,ordinarylanguage.FollowingLuther’sviewofseekingthe“plainsense”ofaScripturepassage,preteristsinsistoninterpretingthetime-framereferencesintheirprimafacie(“plain”)sense.Thethreeoptionsmentionedabovedonottotallyexhaustthepossibilities.
Otheralternativeshavebeengiven.Aswewillseelater,somepreteristsarguefora“literal”fulfillmentoftheentirediscoursewithinthetimespanofasinglehumangeneration.Anothermethodistoapplytheprincipleofprimaryandsecondaryfulfillment
ofbiblicalprophecies(amethodRussellstronglyeschews).Advocatesofthismethodseeanearlyprimaryfulfillmentofprophecy(apartialfulfillment),followedatalatertimebyasecondaryfulfillment(thecompleteorultimatefulfillment).Thismethodhasbeenapplied,forexample,toIsaiah’spropheciesconcerningthevirginbirthandtheSufferingServantofGod.RussellreactsstronglyagainstsuchattemptstointerprettheOlivetDiscourse:
Thecommonlyreceivedviewofthestructureofthisdiscourse,whichisalmosttakenforgranted,alikebyexpositorsandbythegeneralityofreaders,is,thatourLord,inansweringthequestionofhisdisciplesrespectingthedestructionofthetemple,mixesupwiththateventthedestructionoftheworld,theuniversaljudgment,andthefinalconsummationofallthings....
Anobjectionmaybetaken,inlimine,totheprinciplesinvolvedinthismethodofinterpretingScripture.Arewetolookfordouble,triple,andmultiplemeanings,forprophecieswithinprophecies,andmysterieswrappedinmysteries,wherewemightreasonablyhaveexpectedaplainanswertoaplainquestion?CananyonebesureofunderstandingtheScripturesiftheyarethusenigmaticandobscure?18
ThesimplereplytoRussell’squestions,posedinrhetoricalfashion,isthatattimestheScripturesareenigmaticandobscure.LutherandthemagisterialReformersdidteachtheperspicuityofScripture,maintainingthattheScripturesasawholeareclear.Theydidnotdeny,however,thatcertainpassagesareindeedenigmatic.Hencetherulethatcallsforinterpretingtheobscureinlightoftheclear,ratherthantheclearinlightoftheobscure.Thesecondproblemposedbypreterism,andbyfarthemostcrucial,is
whetherthereremainsafuturehopeforthechurch.Isthe“blessedhope”forafuture,consummateparousiaofChrist,anarticleoffaithforhistoric
Christianity,afalsehope?Istheeschatologythatincludestheparousiatobereducedtoanutterly“realizedeschatology”?Thesequestionsrequirethatwedistinguishbetweenmoderatepreterismand
radicalpreterism.Moderatepreterism,thoughitseesthecomingofChristpredictedintheOlivetDiscourseashavingbeenalreadyfulfilled,stillbelievesinafutureconsummationofChristandhiskingdom,basedonotherNewTestamenttexts(whichwewillexplorelater).Radicalpreterism,ontheotherhand,seesvirtuallytheentireNewTestamenteschatologyashavingbeenrealizedalready.
3WHAT“AGE”WASABOUTTOEND?
JerusalemwillbetrampledbyGentilesuntilthetimesoftheGentilesarefulfilled.
Luke21:24
Closelylinkedtotheissuessurroundingthetime-framequestionoftheOlivetDiscourseisthequestionofthebiblicalmeaningof“theendoftheage.”Doesthisphrasepointtotheendofworldhistory,thefinalconsummationofthekingdomofChrist?Ordoesitrefertotheendofaparticulardivineeconomy,namelytheoneinwhichOldTestamentIsraelfiguresprominently?Inotherwords,doesthephrase“theendoftheage”refertotheendoftheJewishage?Fundamentaltopreterismisthecontentionthatthephrase“theendoftheage”
refersspecificallytotheendoftheJewishageandthebeginningoftheageoftheGentiles,orthechurchage.J.StuartRussellbeginshisexpositionofthisconceptbyreferringtothecontentofMatthew13:ThenJesussentthemultitudeawayandwentintothehouse.Andhisdisciplescametohim,saying,“Explaintoustheparableofthetaresofthefield.”Heansweredandsaidtothem:“HewhosowsthegoodseedistheSonofMan.Thefieldistheworld,thegoodseedsarethesonsofthekingdom,butthetaresarethesonsofthewickedone.Theenemywhosowedthemisthedevil,theharvestistheendoftheage,andthereapersaretheangels.Thereforeasthetaresaregatheredandburnedinthefire,soitwillbeattheendofthisage.TheSonofManwillsendouthisangels,andtheywillgatheroutofhiskingdomallthingsthatoffend,andthosewhopracticelawlessness,andwillcastthemintothefurnaceoffire.Therewillbewailingandgnashingofteeth.ThentherighteouswillshineforthasthesuninthekingdomoftheirFather.Hewhohasearstohear,lethimhear!
“Again,thekingdomofheavenisliketreasurehiddeninafield,whichamanfoundandhid;andforjoyoverithegoesandsellsallthathehasandbuysthatfield.“Again,thekingdomofheavenislikeamerchantseekingbeautifulpearls,who,whenhehadfound
onepearlofgreatprice,wentandsoldallthathehadandboughtit.“Again,thekingdomofheavenislikeadragnetthatwascastintotheseaandgatheredsomeof
everykind,which,whenitwasfull,theydrewtoshore;andtheysatdownandgatheredthegoodintovessels,butthrewthebadaway.Soitwillbeattheendoftheage.Theangelswillcomeforth,separatethewickedfromamongthejust,andcastthemintothefurnaceoffire.Therewillbewailingandgnashingofteeth”(Matt.13:36–50).
Verses38–40aretranslatedasfollowsintheKingJamesVersion:Thefieldistheworld;thegoodseedarethechildrenofthekingdom;butthetaresarethechildrenofthewickedone;theenemythatsowedthemisthedevil;theharvestistheendoftheworld;andthereapersaretheangels.Asthereforethetaresaregatheredandburnedinthefire;soshallitbeintheendofthisworld.
Russellcomments:WefindinthepassagesherequotedanexampleofoneofthoseerroneousrenderingswhichhavedonemuchtoconfuseandmisleadtheordinaryreadersofourEnglishversion[theKJV].Itisprobable,thatninety-nineineveryhundredunderstandbythephrase,“theendoftheworld”thecloseofhumanhistory,andthedestructionofthematerialearth.Theywouldnotimaginethatthe“world”inverse38andthe“world”inverses39,40,aretotallydifferentwords,withtotallydifferentmeanings.Yetsuchisthefact.Kosmosinverse38isrightlytranslatedworld,andreferstotheworldofmen,butaiōninverses39,40,referstoaperiodoftime,andshouldberenderedageorepoch....Itisofthegreatestimportancetounderstandcorrectlythetruemeaningofthisword,andofthephrase“theendoftheaeon,orage.”Aiōnis,aswehavesaid,aperiodoftime,oranage.ItisexactlyequivalenttotheLatinwordaevum,whichis
merelyaiōninaLatindress;andthephrase,synteleiatouaiōnos,translatedinourEnglishversion,“theendoftheworld,”shouldbe,“thecloseoftheage.”1
Russellarguesthattheendoftheagesignalsnotmerelyan“end,”butaconsummationofoneagethatisfollowedimmediatelybyanother.ThiswaspartofthetraditionalviewoftheJewswithregardtotheirMessiah.ThenewagethatwouldbeinauguratedbytheappearanceoftheMessiahwouldbecalledthe“kingdomofheaven.”TheexistingagewastheJewishdispensation,whichwasdrawingtoaclose.ThisideawascentraltothepreachingofJohntheBaptist,whospokeofthetimethatwas“athand.”TheNewTestamentviewstheincarnationofJesusasatimeofcrisis.The
Englishwordcrisiscomesfrom(andisatransliterationof)theGreekwordkrisis,theNewTestamentwordfor“judgment.”ThecomingoftheMessiahisdirectlylinkedtotheimpendingjudgmentofIsrael.JohncalledthenationtorepentanceandtocleansingbybaptismbecausetheJewswerenotreadyforthiscrisis,the“visitation”ofGodinthepersonoftheheavenlyJudge,theSonofMan.Thisvisitationwasatwo-edgedsword,atimeofredemptionforthosewhowelcomedhiscomingandatimeofjudgmentforthosewhorejectedhim.UndertheinfluenceoftheHolySpirit,Zachariasprophesied:“Blessedisthe
LordGodofIsrael,forhehasvisitedandredeemedhispeople”(Luke1:68).Thewordtranslated“visited”comesfromtheGreekverbwhosecorrespondingnounisthewordepiskopos.ThistermcomesintotheEnglishlanguageasepiscopal,whichreferstoatypeofchurchgovernmentwhereinauthorityislocatedinbishops.Thetermepiskopositselfismostoftentranslated“bishop.”InaliteralsensethevisitationofGodisadivineactofbishoping.InancientGreekcultureabishopwasnotareligiousfigurebutamilitaryone.Hereviewedthetroopstogaugetheirpreparednessforbattle.Ifthebishopfoundthetroopsunpreparedforbattle,sharppenaltieswouldbefallthem.Thewordepiskoposderivedfromtheroottermskopos,fromwhichwegetthe
wordscope.Ascopeisaninstrumentusedforlookingatsomething.Forexamplewehavemicroscopes,telescopes,andperiscopes.Weuseamicroscopetolookatthingsthataresmall(micro);atelescope,thingsthatarefaraway;andaperiscope,thingsthatare“around”(peri).Theprefixepi-,whenaddedtoaroot-word,servestointensifyitsmeaning.Thusthetermepiskoposreferstosomeonewholooksintently,closelyscrutinizingandevaluatinganobject.Thetermbishopdescribesa“supervisor,”onewhogives“supervision.”WhenGod“visits”hispeopleintheNewTestamentsense,hecomesto
examinetheircondition.Hecomestopraiseortojudge,toredeemortodamn.Hiscominginvolvesafinalexamination.
TheDayoftheLordTheideaofGodvisitinghispeopleiscloselylinkedintheOldTestamenttothecoming“dayoftheLord.”Thephrase“dayoftheLord”figuresheavilyinOldTestamentprophecy.Originallyitwasadayofredemptionthatthepeopleanticipatedwithgreatjoy.AsthefaithandpracticeofthenationofIsraeldegenerates,thephraseundergoesadevelopment.Itbecomesloadedmoreandmorewithforecastsofdoomandjudgment.Yetitalsoretainsanoteofhopeforthefaithful.
TheverylastprophecyintheOldTestamentisfoundinthebookoftheprophetMalachi:“Forbehold,thedayiscoming,burninglikeanoven,andalltheproud,yes,allwhodowickedlywillbestubble.Andthedaywhichiscomingshallburnthemup,”saystheLORDofhosts,“thatwillleavethemneitherrootnorbranch.ButtoyouwhofearMynametheSunofRighteousnessshallarisewithhealinginhiswings;andyoushallgooutandgrowfatlikestall-fedcalves.Youshalltramplethewicked,fortheyshallbeashesunderthesolesofyourfeetonthedaythatIdothis,”saystheLORDofhosts.“RemembertheLawofMoses,Myservant,whichIcommandedhiminHorebforallIsrael,withthestatutesandjudgments.Behold,IwillsendyouElijahtheprophetbeforethecomingofthegreatanddreadfuldayoftheLORD”(Mal.4:1–5).
Thecomingdayisa“burningoven”thatwillconsumethewicked,yetthisdaywillalsoheraldtheSunofRighteousness,whowillcomewithhealinginhiswings.Elijahwillappearbeforethis“greatanddreadful”day.ThedayoftheLordwillbeagreatdayforIsrael,butitwillalsobeadreadfulday.ThisisthecrisisofthecomingoftheSonofMan.HobartE.FreemanwritesaboutthedayoftheLordinthewritingofthe
prophetJoel:“ThecentralthemeofthebookistheemphasisuponthedayoftheLord.Thisuniqueeschatologicalphrase‘thedayofYahweh,’whichwasfirstnotedinObadiah(v.15),isreiteratedagainandagainbytheProphetJoel(1:15;2:1–2,11,31;3:14,18).Itsspiritualsignificanceistobefoundinthenatureandpurposeofthisday;itistobeadayofwrathandjudgmentuponthewickedandadayofsalvationtotherighteous.”2FreemanseesalinkbetweenJoel’sprophecyofthedayoftheLordand
Christ’spredictionsintheOlivetDiscourse.Freemanbelievesitreferstoaneventthatisyettooccurinthefuture:“ThedayofYahwehwillbeheraldedby
divineportents:‘AndIwillshowwondersintheheavensandintheearth:blood,andfire,andpillarsofsmoke.Thesunshallbeturnedintodarkness,andthemoonintoblood,beforethegreatandterribledayofYahwehcometh’(Joel2:30–31).QuiteevidentlysuchapocalypticphenomenadidnotfindfulfillmentatPentecost,butpointtothelatterdaysandthesecondadvent,asourLordhimselfconfirmsinMatthew24:29–30,whereheusesthesameapocalypticimageryinconnectionwithhissecondcoming.”3FreemanseesthelinkbetweenthedayoftheLordandthecatastrophicsigns
enumeratedintheOlivetDiscourse.Hearguesthatitis“quiteevident”thatthesethingswerenotfulfilledatPentecost.SurelyRussellandpreteristswouldagreethatPentecostdidnotmarktheconsummationofthedayoftheLord.Buttheywouldnotagreethatthisdaywillbedelayeduntiltheendoftheworld.TheyseethefulfillmentoccurringmuchclosertoPentecost,namelyinthedestructionofJerusalem.ItisbothfascinatingandrelevanttothepresentdiscussionthatPeter,as
reportedinthebookofActs,seesafulfillment(atleastinpart)ofJoel’sprophecyonthedayofPentecost:ButthisiswhatwasspokenbytheprophetJoel:“Anditshallcometopassinthelastdays,saysGod,thatIwillpouroutofMySpiritonallflesh;yoursonsandyourdaughtersshallprophesy,youryoungmenshallseevisions,youroldmenshalldreamdreams.AndonMymenservantsandonMymaidservantsIwillpouroutMySpiritinthosedays;andtheyshallprophesy.Iwillshowwondersinheavenaboveandsignsintheearthbeneath:bloodandfireandvaporofsmoke.Thesunshallbeturnedintodarkness,andthemoonintoblood,beforethecomingofthegreatandnotabledayoftheLord.AnditshallcometopassthatwhoevercallsonthenameoftheLordshallbesaved”(Acts2:16–21).
InthisdiscourseatPentecost,PetersaysthephenomenonpeoplehavejustwitnessedistheonespokenofbytheProphetJoel.Joel’sprophecyisoneaboutthelastdaysandaboutthesignsthatwouldsignalthecomingdayoftheLord.IfFreemaniscorrectinhisassessment,thenpartofJoel’sprophecywasfulfilledatPentecost,butthelargerportionofithasremainedunfulfilledforthousandsofyearssincethen.BeforeseeinghowRussellhandlesthepropheciesofJoelandMalachi,we
shalllookatotherOldTestamentpropheciesregardingthedayoftheLord.ThefirstisAmos’sfamoussummaryofthedayoftheLord:“WoetoyouwhodesirethedayoftheLORD!ForwhatgoodisthedayoftheLORDtoyou?Itwillbedarkness,andnotlight.Itwillbeasthoughamanfledfromalion,andabearmethim;orasthoughhewentintothehouse,leanedhishandonthewall,anda
serpentbithim.IsnotthedayoftheLORDdarkness,andnotlight?Isitnotverydark,withnobrightnessinit?”(Amos5:18–20).AmosusestheHebrewliterarydeviceoftheoracle.Thisisanoracleofdoom,
prefacedbythewordwoe.Graphicimagesdescribetheironythatwillbefallthosewhohaveafalseexpectation.Theywillbelikethemanwhofleesfromaliononlytobeconfrontedbyabear.BruceVawtercommentsonthistext:The“dayofYahweh”isanotherofthosebeliefsolderthantheprophets,towhichAmosrefers,astothe“remnant,”asneedingnoexplanation.ItwastobethedayofYahweh’sintervention,hissettlingofaccounts.FaithfulIsraelitescouldonlyyearnforsuchaday,whenthepeopleofGodwouldbevindicatedalongwithYahwehhimself.ButtheIsraeltowhichAmoswasspeakingwasnolongerthepeopleofGod.IfYahwehistotakevengeanceonhisenemies,whatwillhenotdotothatpeoplethathadbecomehisgreatestenemy,thathadrejectedhimnotunknowinglybutinthefulllightofknowledge?Inkeepingwithhisminimalviewoftheremnant,Amos’expectationofthedayofYahwehisentirelypessimistic.4
Amos’spessimismconcerningthedayoftheLordistemperedbyelementsofhopeinthepropheciesofHosea,Isaiah,andZephaniah.Zephaniahsays:...BesilentinthepresenceoftheLordGOD;forthedayoftheLORDisathand,fortheLORDhaspreparedasacrifice;hehasinvitedhisguests.“Anditshallbe,inthedayoftheLORD’Ssacrifice,thatIwillpunishtheprincesandtheking’schildren,andallsuchasareclothedwithforeignapparel.InthesamedayIwillpunishallthosewholeapoverthethreshold,whofilltheirmasters’houseswithviolenceanddeceit.Andthereshallbeonthatday,”saystheLORD,“thesoundofamournfulcryfromtheFishGate,awailingfromtheSecondQuarter,andaloudcrashingfromthehills.Wail,youinhabitantsofMaktesh!Forallthemerchantpeoplearecutdown;allthosewhohandlemoneyarecutoff.AnditshallcometopassatthattimethatIwillsearchJerusalemwithlamps,andpunishthemenwhoaresettledincomplacency,whosayintheirheart,‘TheLORDwillnotdogood,norwillhedoevil.’Thereforetheirgoodsshallbecomebooty,andtheirhousesadesolation;theyshallbuildhouses,butnotinhabitthem;theyshallplantvineyards,butnotdrinktheirwine.”
ThegreatdayoftheLORDisnear;itisnearandhastensquickly.ThenoiseofthedayoftheLORDisbitter;therethemightymenshallcryout.Thatdayisadayofwrath,adayoftroubleanddistress,adayofdevastationanddesolation,adayofdarknessandgloominess,adayofcloudsandthickdarkness,adayoftrumpetandalarmagainstthefortifiedcitiesandagainstthehightowers.“Iwillbringdistressuponmen,andtheyshallwalklikeblindmen,becausetheyhavesinnedagainsttheLORD;theirbloodshallbepouredoutlikedust,andtheirfleshlikerefuse”(Zeph.1:7–17).
ThisgrimportendofthedayoftheLordechoesthatofAmos.ButlaterZephaniahaddstoitanoteofoptimism:“Gatheryourselvestogether,yes,gathertogether,Oundesirablenation,beforethedecreeisissued,beforethedaypasseslikechaff,beforetheLORD’sfierceangercomesuponyou,beforethedayoftheLORD’sangercomesuponyou!SeektheLORD,allyoumeekoftheearth,whohaveupheldhisjustice.Seekrighteousness,seekhumility.ItmaybethatyouwillbehiddeninthedayoftheLORD’sanger”(Zeph.2:1–3).
RussellontheDayoftheLordInRussell’sviewtheOldTestamentpropheciesregardingthecomingdayoftheLordpointtothedestructionofJerusaleminAD70.Hewrites:Thatthisisnovagueandunmeaningthreatisevidentfromthedistinctanddefinitetermsinwhichitisannounced.Everythingpointstoanapproachingcrisisinthehistoryofthenation,whenGodwouldinflictjudgmentuponhisrebelliouspeople.“Theday”wascoming—“thedaythatshallburnasafurnace”;“thegreatandterribledayoftheLord.”Thatthis“day”referstoacertainperiod,andaspecificevent,doesnotadmitofquestion...andweshallmeetwithadistinctreferencetoitintheaddressoftheApostlePeterontheDayofPentecost(Acts2:20).ButtheperiodisfurthermorepreciselydefinedbytheremarkablestatementofMalachi...“Behold,IwillsendyouElijahtheprophetbeforethecomingofthegreatandterribledayoftheLord”[Mal.4:5].TheexplicitdeclarationofourLordthatthepredictedElijahwasnootherthanhisownforerunner,JohntheBaptist(Matt.11:14)enablesustodeterminethetimeandtheeventreferredtoas“thegreatandterribledayoftheLord.”ItmustbesoughtatnogreatdistancefromtheperiodofJohntheBaptist.Thatistosay,theallusionistothejudgmentoftheJewishnation,whentheircityandtempleweredestroyed,andtheentirefabricoftheMosaicpolitywasdissolved.5
RussellarguesthatthesepropheciesrefernottoChrist’sfirstcoming,buttoChrist’ssecondcoming—injudgmentonJerusalem.AtthispointwemustaskhowthedayoftheLordrelatestotheconceptofdivinevisitation(episkopos).WehavealreadynotedthatatthebirthofJohntheBaptist,Zachariassaidthat“theLordhasvisitedandredeemedhispeople”(Luke1:68).ItwouldseemthenthatthedayofvisitationatleastbeginswithinthecontextoftheincarnationofChrist,whoseheraldwasJohntheBaptist.LukeusesthelanguageofvisitationwithrespecttoJesus’searthlyministry.
Nowithappened,thedayafter,thathewentintoacitycalledNain;andmanyofhisdiscipleswentwithhim,andalargecrowd.Andwhenhecamenearthegateofthecity,behold,adeadmanwasbeingcarriedout,theonlysonofhismother;andshewasawidow.Andalargecrowdfromthecitywaswithher.WhentheLordsawher,hehadcompassiononherandsaidtoher,“Donotweep.”Thenhecameandtouchedtheopencoffin,andthosewhocarriedhimstoodstill.Andhesaid,“Youngman,Isaytoyou,arise.”Andhewhowasdeadsatupandbegantospeak.Andhepresentedhimtohismother.Thenfearcameuponall,andtheyglorifiedGod,saying,“Agreatprophethasrisenupamongus”;and,“Godhasvisitedhispeople.”AndthisreportabouthimwentthroughoutallJudeaandallthesurroundingregion(Luke7:11–17).
ClearlytheministryofJesuswasseenintermsofadivinevisitation.JesushimselfusedthesetermsinhislamentoverJerusalemonPalmSunday:...AndsomeofthePhariseescalledtohimfromthecrowd,“Teacher,rebukeYourdisciples.”Butheansweredandsaidtothem,“Itellyouthatiftheseshouldkeepsilent,thestoneswouldimmediatelycryout.”
Nowashedrewnear,hesawthecityandweptoverit,saying,“Ifyouhadknown,evenyou,especiallyinthisyourday,thethingsthatmakeforyourpeace!Butnowtheyarehiddenfromyoureyes.Forthedayswillcomeuponyouwhenyourenemieswillbuildanembankmentaroundyou,surroundyouandcloseyouinoneveryside,andlevelyou,andyourchildrenwithinyou,totheground;andtheywillnotleaveinyouonestoneuponanother,becauseyoudidnotknowthetimeofyourvisitation”(Luke19:39–44).
InthislamentJesusspeaksof“thisyourday”inwhichcertainthingswereunknowntothemandconcealedfromtheireyes.Thenhespeaksofthecomingdaysinwhichnotonestonewillbeleftonanotherbecausetheywereignorantofthetimeoftheirvisitation.I.HowardMarshallcomments:AsJesusseesJerusalemspreadoutbeforehim,heweepsoverthedestructionwhichwillcomeoveritunawares.Thecitycouldhavelearnedthewayofpeacefromhisteaching,butitwouldfailtorecognizeinhiscomingthegraciouspresenceofGodofferingalastopportunityofrepentance;theattitudeofthePharisees(Luke19:39–40)wouldprevail.Therewouldbeadifferentkindofvisitationinduecourse,ajudgmentinwhichenemieswoulddestroythecitystonebystone....
...thereisnoreasontodoubtthattheChristianinterpretationofthefallofJerusalemastheoutcomeoffailuretoacceptthemessageofJesusgoesbacktoJesushimself....
...HerethevisitationisintendedtobetheoccasionofsalvationasproclaimedbyJesus;unrecognizedassuch,thesamevisitationbecomesthebasisforajudgmentyettofollow.6
Weconcludethatthedayofvisitationreferspartlytotheincarnation.Thiseventbroughtadouble-edgedcrisis.Jesus’searthlyministrybroughtthegraciouspresenceofGod’sredemptiontothosewhoreceivedhim,butsetthestageforasoon-to-occurvisitationofwrathandjudgmenttoJerusalemandtheimpenitentchildrenofIsrael.Hereisan“alreadyandnotyet,”butonethatspansaboutfortyyears,notcenturiesormillennia.
ParablesaboutJudgmentRussellsees,then,thedayoftheLord’svisitationofwrathandjudgmentonJerusalemasthetimewhentheLordcomessuddenlytohistemple,predictedinMalachi3:1.HefindsJesus’sforecastsofthiscomingjudgment,notonlyintheOlivetDiscourse,butalsoinotherplaces,particularlyintherashofparablesJesusuttersneartheendofhispublicministry.
Withreferencetotheparableofthepounds(Luke19:11–27),Russellwrites:“ItcannotfailtostrikeeveryattentivereaderoftheGospelhistory,howmuchtheteachingofourLord,asheapproachedthecloseofhisministry,dweltuponthethemeofcomingjudgment.Whenhespokethisparable,hewasonhiswaytoJerusalemtokeephislastPassoverbeforehesuffered;anditisremarkablehowhisdiscoursesfromthistimeseemalmostwhollyengrossed,notbyhisownapproachingdeath,buttheimpendingcatastropheofthenation.”7RussellpointsbeyondtheparableofthepoundstoJesus’scursingofthefig
tree,parableofthewickedhusbandmen,parableofthemarriageoftheking’sson(Matt.22:1–14),secondlamentationoverJerusalem,andwoespronouncedon“thatgeneration”(Matt.23:13–30).RussellseesalloftheseasreferencestothecatastrophethatisabouttobefalltheJewishnation.Withrespecttotheparableofthepounds,RussellquotesAugustusNeanderfavorably:Inthisparable,inviewofthecircumstancesunderwhichitwasuttered,andoftheapproachingcatastrophe,specialintimationsaregivenofChrist’sdeparturefromtheearth,ofhisascension,andreturntojudgetherebelliousTheocraticnationandconsummatehisdominion.Itdescribesagreatman,whotravelstothedistantcourtofthemightyemperor,toreceivefromhimauthorityoverhiscountrymen,andtoreturnwithroyalpower.SoChristwasnotimmediately
recognizedinhiskinglyoffice,butfirsthadtodepartfromtheearthandleavehisagentstoadvancehiskingdom,toascendintoheavenandbeappointedTheocraticKing,andreturnagaintoexercisehiscontestedpower.8
Tounderstandthefullimportofwhatisbeingclaimedhere,weneedtolookatthecompletetextoftheparable:Nowastheyheardthesethings,hespokeanotherparable,becausehewasnearJerusalemandbecausetheythoughtthekingdomofGodwouldappearimmediately.Thereforehesaid:“Acertainnoblemanwentintoafarcountrytoreceiveforhimselfakingdomandtoreturn.Sohecalledtenofhisservants,deliveredtothemtenminas,andsaidtothem,‘DobusinesstillIcome.’Buthiscitizenshatedhim,andsentadelegationafterhim,saying,‘Wewillnothavethismantoreignoverus.’
“Andsoitwasthatwhenhereturned,havingreceivedthekingdom,hethencommandedtheseservants,towhomhehadgiventhemoney,tobecalledtohim,thathemightknowhowmucheverymanhadgainedbytrading.“Thencamethefirst,saying,‘Master,yourminahasearnedtenminas.’“Andhesaidtohim,‘Welldone,goodservant;becauseyouwerefaithfulinaverylittle,have
authorityovertencities.’“Andthesecondcame,saying,‘Master,yourminahasearnedfiveminas.’“Likewisehesaidtohim,‘Youalsobeoverfivecities.’“Andanothercame,saying,‘Master,hereisyourmina,whichIhavekeptputawayina
handkerchief.ForIfearedyou,becauseyouareanaustereman.Youcollectwhatyoudidnotdeposit,andreapwhatyoudidnotsow.’“Andhesaidtohim,‘OutofyourownmouthIwilljudgeyou,youwickedservant.YouknewthatI
wasanaustereman,collectingwhatIdidnotdepositandreapingwhatIdidnotsow.Whythendidyounotputmymoneyinthebank,thatatmycomingImighthavecollecteditwithinterest?’“Andhesaidtothosewhostoodby,‘Taketheminafromhim,andgiveittohimwhohasten
minas.’(“Buttheysaidtohim,‘Master,hehastenminas.’)“‘ForIsaytoyou,thattoeveryonewhohaswill
begiven;andfromhimwhodoesnothave,evenwhathehaswillbetakenawayfromhim.Butbringherethoseenemiesofmine,whodidnotwantmetoreignoverthem,andslaythembeforeme’”(Luke19:11–27).
AccordingtoRussell,Jesusgavethisparabletoinsurethathisdiscipleswouldnothopethatthekingdomwastocomeimmediately.Hedeclaredthatanintervaloftimemustintervenebeforetheirexpectationswerefulfilled.Thekingdomwasstill“athand,”butnotasnearasthedisciplessupposed.Christhadtodepart,or“goaway,”foralittlewhile.RusselldoesnotseeasanoptiontheideathatChristwoulddepartforalongwhile.Christ’sdepartureforashortperiodwasthehopeandfaithoftheearlychurch,anditwasnotadelusion.Russell’sthesisatthispointdependsheavilyontheassumptionthatthephrase
“theendoftheage”refersnottotheendofhistoryortheendoftheworld,buttotheendoftheJewishage.TherearefourreferencesinMatthew’sGospelto
“theendoftheage.”NoneexplicitlyspecifiestheJewishage.ThismustbesuppliedontheassumptionthatthephraseisellipticalandthetermJewishistacitlyunderstood.RussellandotherpreteristsdrawthisinferencefromindicationsthattheendoftheageisnearandfromNewTestamentreferencesto“theageoftheGentiles.”
TheAgeoftheGentilesSincetheNewTestamentdoesspeakoftheageoftheGentiles,itisreasonabletoassumethatthisageisincontrasttosomeageoftheJews,sincethecontextmakesasharpcontrastbetweenJewsandGentiles.
WefirstmeettheconceptoftheageoftheGentilesinLuke’sversionoftheOlivetDiscourse,whenJesusdescribesthedestructionofJerusalem:ButwhenyouseeJerusalemsurroundedbyarmies,thenknowthatitsdesolationisnear.ThenletthoseinJudeafleetothemountains,letthosewhoareinthemidstofherdepart,andletnotthosewhoareinthecountryenterher.Forthesearethedaysofvengeance,thatallthingswhicharewrittenmaybefulfilled.Butwoetothosewhoarepregnantandtothosewhoarenursingbabiesinthosedays!Fortherewillbegreatdistressinthelandandwrathuponthispeople.Andtheywillfallbytheedgeofthesword,andbeledawaycaptiveintoallnations.AndJerusalemwillbetrampledbyGentilesuntilthetimesoftheGentilesarefulfilled(Luke21:20–24).
HerethetimesoftheGentilesarerelatedtotheoccupationofJerusalembynon-Jewishpeople.ButthisGentileoccupationofJerusalemwillnotendureindefinitely.Thereisacrucial“until”mentionedhere.Thiswordfixesatemporalpointofcompletion.Thistextfiguredprominentlyineschatologicalexpectationsthatwererekindledin1967whenJewswrestedcontrolofJerusalemfromtheArabGentileswhohadcontrolledit.InLuke’saccountoftheOlivetDiscourse,thedescriptionoftheparousia
followsimmediatelyuponverse24.Thisraisesthequestion:WilltheparousiadescribedheretakeplaceafterthetimesoftheGentilesarefulfilled,i.e.,afterJerusalemisrestoredtotheJews?OrdoesLuke21:27refertoaparousiathatsignalstheendofoneageortime(theageoftheJews)andthebeginningofanewone,thetimesoftheGentiles?Variousschemashavebeenoffered.OneisthattheJewishdispensationwas
temporarilyhaltedinAD70,followedbyaninterimduringwhichthefocusis
onthemissiontotheGentiles,followedbytherenewalofJewishredemptionattheendoftime.AnotheristhatallChristianhistorybetweenthefallofJerusalemandtheparousiaofChrististhetimesoftheGentiles.AndathirdisthatthetimesoftheGentileswastheveryshortspanoftimebetweenthebeginningofthesiegeofJerusalemandthecity’sdestruction.Luke’sreferenceto“thetimesoftheGentiles”lendscredencetotheideathat
ScripturedistinguishesbetweenaJewishepochandaGentileepoch.Thisinturnsupportstheideathat“theendoftheage”mayrefertotheendoftheJewishage.
Table3.2TheNearnessoftheLastDaystotheApostles
TheGospels
Matt.10:23 You[thetwelve]willnothavegonethroughthecitiesofIsraelbeforetheSonofMancomes.
Matt.26:64 You[thehighpriest]willseetheSonofMancomingonthecloudsofheaven.
Paul’sLetters
Rom.13:11–12 Nowitishightimetoawakeoutofsleep....Thenightisfarspent,thedayisathand.
1Cor.7:31 Theformofthisworldispassingaway.
1Cor.10:11 On[us]...theendsoftheageshavecome.
Phil.4:5 TheLordisathand
GeneralLetters
James5:8–9 ThecomingoftheLordisathand....Behold,theJudgeisstandingatthedoor.
1Peter4:7 Theendofallthingsisathand.
1John2:18 Itisthelasthour...weknowthatitisthelasthour.
TheBookofRevelation
1:1 TheRevelationofJesusChrist...[showsthe]thingswhichmustshortlytakeplace.
1:3 Thetimeisnear.
3:11 Behold,Icomequickly!
22:6–7 His[theLordGod’s]angel...[showed]Hisservantsthethingswhichmustshortlytakeplace.Behold,Iamcomingquickly.
22:10 Thetimeisathand.
22:12 Behold,Iamcomingquickly.
22:20 SurelyIamcomingquickly.
TheLastDaysAccordingtopreterists“thelastdays”referstothetimebetweentheadventofJohntheBaptistandthedestructionofJerusalem.This“eschaton”refersnottoatimeinthedistantfuture,buttoatimethatisimminent.GaryDeMarsummarizestherelevantpassagesoftheNewTestamentwithemphasisontheradicalnearnessoftheeventspredicted:Somecataclysmiceventwasonthehorizon,andthefirst-centurychurchwasbeingwarnedtoprepareforit.Thereisnogettingaroundthislanguageandtheultimateconclusionthatmanyoftheversesthatmanybelieveareyettobefulfilledhavebeenfulfilled....
1. “AndyouwillbehatedbyallonaccountofMyname,butitistheonewhohasenduredtotheendwhowillbesaved.Butwhenevertheypersecuteyouinthiscity,fleetothenext;fortrulyIsaytoyou,youshallnotfinishgoingthroughthecitiesofIsraeluntiltheSonofMancomes”(Matt.10:22–23,emphasisadded).
2. “Jesussaidto[thehighpriest],‘Youhavesaidityourself[thatIamtheChrist,theSonofGod];neverthelessItellyou,hereafteryoushallseetheSonofMansittingattherighthandofpower,andcomingonthecloudsofheaven’”(Matt.26:64,emphasisadded).
3. “Andthisdo,knowingthetime,thatitisalreadythehourforyoutoawakenfromsleep;fornowsalvationisnearertousthanwhenwebelieved”(Rom.13:11).
4. “Thenightisalmostgoneandthedayisathand.Letusthereforelayasidethedeedsofdarknessandputonthearmoroflight”(Rom.13:12,emphasisadded).
5. “Fortheformofthisworldispassingaway”(1Cor.7:31,emphasisadded).6. “Nowthesethingshappenedto[Israel]asanexample,andtheywerewrittenforour
instruction,uponwhomtheendsoftheageshavecome”(1Cor.10:11,emphasisadded).7. “Letyourforbearingspiritbeknowntoallmen.TheLordisnear”(Phil.4:5,emphasis
added).8. “Theendofallthingsisathand;thereforebeofsoundjudgmentandsoberspiritforthe
purposeofprayer”(1Pet.4:7,emphasisadded).9. “Youtoobepatient;strengthenyourhearts,forthecomingoftheLordisathand.Donot
complain,brethren,againstoneanother,thatyouyourselvesmaynotbejudged;behold,theJudgeisstandingrightatthedoor”(James5:8–9,emphasisadded).
10. “Children,itisthelasthour;andjustasyouhaveheardthatantichristiscoming,evennowmanyantichristshavearisen;fromthisweknowthatitisthelasthour”(1John2:18,emphasisadded).
11. “TheRevelationofJesusChrist,whichGodgavehimtoshowtohisbond-servants,thethingswhichmustshortlytakeplace...”(Rev.1:1,emphasisadded).
12. “Blessedishewhoreadsandthosewhohearthewordsoftheprophecy,andheedthethingswhicharewritteninit;forthetimeisnear”(Rev.1:3,emphasisadded).
13. “Iamcomingquickly;holdfastwhatyouhave,inorderthatnoonetakeyourcrown”(Rev.3:11).
14. “Andhesaidtome,‘Thesewordsarefaithfulandtrue’;andtheLord,theGodofthespiritsoftheprophets,senthisangeltoshowhisbond-servantsthethingswhichmustshortlytakeplace”(Rev.22:6,emphasisadded).
15. “Andbehold,Iamcomingquickly.Blessedishewhoheedsthewordsoftheprophecyofthisbook”(Rev.22:7,emphasisadded).
16. “Andhesaidtome,‘Donotsealupthewordsoftheprophecyofthisbook,forthetimeisnear”(Rev.22:10,emphasisadded).ComparethisversewithDaniel12:4,whereDanielistoldto“sealupthebookuntiltheendoftime.”
17. “Behold,Iamcomingquickly,andMyrewardiswithMe,torendertoeverymanaccordingtowhathehasdone”(Rev.22:12,emphasisadded;cf.Matt.16:27).
18. “Hewhotestifiestothesethingssays,‘Yes,Iamcomingquickly.’Amen.Come,LordJesus”(Rev.22:20,emphasisadded).
Thesepassagesandmanyotherslikethemtellusthatasignificanteschatologicaleventwastooccurinthelifetimeofthosewhoheardandreadtheprophecies.9
ThepassageslistedbyDeMarareamongthosethathaveledhigher-criticalscholarstobeskepticaloftheNewTestamentandtoseewithinitattemptstoadjustthenarrativetoaccountforunfulfilledpropheciesandparousia-delay.WhensuchpassagesaregroupedtogetherasDeMarhasdone,theystronglysuggestanear-timefulfillment.Someofthemcanbehandledmoreeasilythanothers.Forexamplenumber2(Matt.26:64),whichgivesJesus’swordstoPontiusPilate,mayrefertoanindefinitefuture.Pilate’s“seeing”thecomingofChristinthe“hereafter”doesnotdemandafirst-centuryfulfillment.Oneofthemostcrucialpassagescitedabove,however,isthatfoundin
number6(1Cor.10:11).Hereismentioned“theendsoftheages”thathavecomeupontheJews.Thistextsupportsthethesisthat“theendoftheage”means“theendoftheJewishage.”Russellplacesstrongemphasisonthistext:Thephrase“theendoftheages”[tatelētōnaiōnōn]isequivalentto“theendoftheage”[tēssynteleiatouaiōnos],and“theend”[totelos].Theyallrefertothesameperiod,viz.thecloseoftheJewishage,ordispensation,whichwasnowathand....
ItissometimessaidthatthewholeperiodbetweentheincarnationandtheendoftheworldisregardedintheNewTestamentas“theendoftheage.”Butthisbearsamanifestincongruityinitsveryfront.Howcouldtheendofaperiodbealongprotractedduration?Especiallyhowcoulditbelongerthantheperiodofwhichitistheend?MoretimehasalreadyelapsedsincetheincarnationthanfromthegivingofthelawtothefirstcomingofChrist:sothat,onthishypothesis,theendoftheageisagreatdeallongerthantheageitself.10
4WHATDIDPAULTEACHINHIS
LETTERS?
YouturnedtoGodfromidolstoservethelivingandtrueGod,andtowaitforHisSonfromheaven.
1Thessalonians1:9–10
J.StuartRussellbeginshistreatmentoftheEpistlesbygivingattentiontotheThessaloniancorrespondence.Hefirsttreats1Thessalonians1:9–10:“Fortheythemselvesdeclareconcerninguswhatmannerofentrywehadtoyou,andhowyouturnedtoGodfromidolstoservethelivingandtrueGod,andtowaitforhisSonfromheaven,whomheraisedfromthedead,evenJesuswhodeliversusfromthewrathtocome.”ThisverseaccentuatestwocriticalmotifsoftheNewTestament:thechurch’swaitingforChristandChrist’sdeliveranceofhispeople“fromthewrathtocome.”RussellseesalinkbetweenPaul’sreferenceto“thewrathtocome”andJohn
theBaptist’swarningtohisgenerationto“fleefromthewrathtocome”(Luke3:7).“Itwouldbeamistaketosuppose,”Russellsays,“thatSt.Paulherereferstotheretributionwhichawaitseverysinfulsoulinafuturestate;itwasaparticularandpredictedcatastrophewhichhehadinview.‘Thecomingwrath’[hēorgēhēerchomenē]ofthispassageisidenticalwiththe‘comingwrath’[orgēmellousa]ofthesecondElijah;itisidenticalwith‘thedaysofvengeance,’and‘wrathuponthispeople,’predictedbyourLord(Luke21:23).Itis‘thedayofwrath,andrevelationoftherighteousjudgmentofGod,’spokenofbySt.Paul(Rom.2:5).”1
In1Thessalonians2:16Paulwrites,“...[theJewsare]forbiddingustospeaktotheGentilesthattheymaybesaved,soasalwaystofillupthemeasureoftheirsins;butwrathhascomeuponthemtotheuttermost.”Thisverse,whenplacednexttoPaul’sstatementinchapter1,issomewhatconfusing.Inthefirstchapterthewrathisfuture,whileinthischapterthewrathhasalreadycome.
Wrathin1Thessalonians1–2
FutureWrath(1:10) PresentWrath(2:16)
Jesus...delivers Wrathhascome
us[followersoftheLord] uponthem[theJews]
fromthewrathtocome. totheuttermost.
JohnCalvinsaysofthis:“[Paul]meansthattheyhaveabsolutelynohope,becausetheyarethevesselsofthewrathoftheLord.WhatheissayingisthatthejustvengeanceofGodbesetsandharriesthem,andwillnotleavethemuntiltheyperish.”2JonathanEdwardspreachedasermonon1Thessalonians2:16entitledWhen
theWickedShallHaveFilledUptheMeasureofTheirSin,WrathWillComeuponThemtotheUttermost.InthissermonhecommentsonthesignificanceofthetermuttermostasitrelatestothewrathofGod:
Thedegreeoftheirpunishment,istheuttermostdegree.Thismayrespectbothanationalandpersonalpunishment.Ifwetakeitasanationalpunishment,alittleafterthetimewhentheepistlewaswritten,wrathcameuponthenationoftheJewstotheuttermost,intheirterribledestructionbytheRomans;when,asChristsaid,“wasgreattribulation,suchasneverwassincethebeginningoftheworldtothattime”(Matt.24:21).Thatnationhadbeforesufferedmanyofthefruitsofdivinewrathfortheirsins;butthiswasbeyondall,thiswastheirhighestdegreeofpunishmentasanation....Bythisexpressionisalsodenotedthecertaintyofthispunishment.Forthoughthepunishmentwasthenfuture,yetitisspokenofaspresent:“Thewrathiscomeuponthemtotheuttermost.”Itwasascertainasifithadalreadytakenplace....Italsodenotesthenearapproachofit.ThywrathIScome;i.e.,itisjustathand;itisatthedoor;asitprovedwithrespecttothatnation;theirterribledestructionbytheRomanswassoonaftertheapostlewrotethisepistle.3
InthismannerEdwardstiestogether“thewrathtocome”ofchap.1withthe“wrath[that]hascomeuponthem”inchapter2.
Alsoinchapter2,andonlythreeverseslater,theapostlespeaksoftheparousiaofChrist:“Forwhatisourhope,orjoy,orcrownofrejoicing?IsitnotevenyouinthepresenceofourLordJesusChristathiscoming?”(1Thess.2:19).Inthecloseconjunctionofthesetwoevents,thecomingoftheuttermost
wrathandthecomingofChrist,RussellseesareferencetothepredictedeventthatwillbefataltotheenemiesofChristandajoyousvictoryforhisfriends.“EverywherethemostmalignantopposersandpersecutorsofChristianityweretheJews,”writesRussell.“TheannihilationoftheJewishnationality,therefore,removedthemostformidableantagonistoftheGospelandbroughtrestandrelieftosufferingChristians.OurLordhadsaidtohisdisciples,whenspeakingofthisapproachingcatastrophe,‘Whenthesethingsbegintocometopass,thenlookup,andliftupyourheads,foryourredemptiondrawethnigh’(Luke21:28).”4AtfirstglanceRussell’scommentsmayappeartobeanti-Semitic.Butthe
realityinthefirstcenturywasthatthemostintensepersecutionoftheChristianchurchcame,notfromtheRomans,butfromtheJewishcommunity.TheRomansandtheoutsideworldviewedtheChristiancommunityasmerelyasmallsectofJudaism.ChristianitydidnotspreadgloballyandbecomeaworldreligiousforceuntilafterJerusalemwasdestroyedandtheJewishpeoplewerescatteredamongthenations.Thesameapostlewhospeaksof“thewrathtocome”wasanythingbutanti-Semitic,asbecomesclearwhenhesayshewouldbewillingtoperishhimselfifitwouldmeantheredemptionofhis“kinsmenaccordingtotheflesh,”theIsraelites(Rom.9:3).TheThessaloniancorrespondencefiguresheavilyinbiblicaleschatology,
particularlybecauseofitsdescriptionoftherapture(1Thess.4:17)andofthecomingof“themanofsin”or“thelawlessone”(2Thess.2:3–10).Thesethemes,whicharevitallyimportanttoRussellandpreterism,wewillpassoverfornow,butwillanalyzelater.
EagerlyAwaitingtheLord
RussellnexttreatsthereferencestotheparousiaintheCorinthianletters.Herefersfirstto1Corinthians1:7–8,wherePaulthanksGodthattheCorinthianbelieverswill“comeshortinnogift,eagerlywaitingfortherevelationofourLordJesusChrist,whowillalsoconfirmyoutotheend,thatyoumaybeblamelessinthedayofourLordJesusChrist.”
PauldescribestheCorinthianbelieversas“eagerlywaiting”forChrist’scoming.IfPaulwrote1CorinthiansaroundAD57,itisremarkablethat,thirteenyearsbeforethedestructionofJerusalem,theearlyChristianswereinapostureofeageranticipation.Thisthemeisunderlinedinredbyhighercritics.TheyseeintheNewTestamentwritersastrongconvictionthatChristwouldcomeinthenearterm,anexpectationbasedonfalsehopes,hopesthatfailedtomaterializeastheyearspassed.Accordingtothesecriticsthisfailurerequiredthatthechurchreviseitsoriginaleschatologicalhopes.RussellnotesthattheGreektranslated“eagerlywaiting”isalsousedin
Romans8:19:“FortheearnestexpectationofthecreationeagerlywaitsfortherevealingofthesonsofGod.”LukeemploysitalsotodescribeSimeon’ssenseofexpectancyasheawaitedtheConsolationofIsrael(Luke2:25).RussellseesinthisattitudeaclearindicationthatNewTestamentbelievers
thoughttheLord’scoming,hisparousia,wasnear.Otherwise,theireageranticipationwouldmostsurelyendindisappointment.Inthissamepassage(1Cor.1:7–8)Paulrefersto“theend.”“Obviously,by
‘theend’theapostledoesnotmeanthe‘endoflife,’”Russellsays.“Itisnotageneralsentimentsuchasweexpresswhenwespeakofbeing‘truetothelast’;ithasadefinitemeaning,andreferstoaparticulartime.Itis‘theend’[totelos]spokenofbyourLordinhispropheticdiscourseontheMountofOlives(Matt.24:6,13,14).Itis‘theendoftheage’[synteleiatouaiōnos]ofMatthew13:40,49.Itis‘theend’(1Cor.15:24)....Alltheseformsofexpressionrefertothesameepoch—viz.,thecloseoftheaeonorJewishage,i.e.,theMosaicdispensation.”5Similarlyin1Corinthians3Paulreferstothecoming“day”:“...eachone’s
workwillbecomemanifest[clear];fortheDaywilldeclareit,becauseitwillberevealedbyfire;andthefirewilltesteachone’swork,ofwhatsortitis.Ifanyone’sworkwhichhehasbuiltonitendures,hewillreceiveareward.Ifanyone’sworkisburned,hewillsufferloss;buthehimselfwillbesaved,yetsoasthroughfire”(1Cor.3:13–15).InthispassagePaulmentionsagain“theDay.”Alreadyinchapter1Paulhad
spokenofwaitingforthedayoftheLord.Inchapter3hedescribesthemanifestationsthatwillaccompanythisdayandusestheimageoffire.Thedaywouldbeakindofcrucible,anordealoftestingbyfire.ItisclearthatthisdayissynonymouswiththedayoftheLordthatislinkedtotheparousiaofChrist.Thereferencetofirehasbeentakeninbothametaphoricalandaliteralsense.RussellpointstotheliteralburningofJerusalemasfulfillmentofthis.Later,inchapter7,Paulprovidesanothertime-framereference:“...thetime
isshort,sothatfromnowoneventhosewhohavewivesshouldbeasthough
theyhadnone,thosewhoweepasthoughtheydidnotweep,thosewhorejoiceasthoughtheydidnotrejoice,thosewhobuyasthoughtheydidnotpossess,andthosewhousethisworldasnotmisusingit.Fortheformofthisworldispassingaway”(1Cor.7:29–31).Pauldeclaresthat“thetimeisshort,”soshortthathisreadersshouldliveina
stylebefittinganemergencyorcrisissituation.CalvinandothersseethisasacompressionoftimebetweenthefirstadventofChristandhisstillfuturesecondadvent.Thisistheinterimofthelastdays.Theproblemwiththistraditionalviewisthetermshort.Thiswordcandefine
durationoftimeorlengthofspace.Inbothcasesitisarelativeterm.Wemayask,“Shortcomparedtowhat?”Fortyyearsisashorttimecomparedwith2,000years.Yet2,000yearsisashorttimecomparedwith15millionyears.Whenoneannouncestopeoplethataneventwilltakeplacewithinashorttime,however,theywouldhardlyunderstandthattomeanaperiodofmillennia.SurelytheCorinthianswouldnothaveunderstoodPaultobeurgingthemtodosomethingbecausethetimeisshortwheninfactitisthousandsofyearsaway.Inchapter10Paulspeaksagainoftheend:“Nowallthesethingshappenedto
them[allourfathers]asexamples,andtheywerewrittenforouradmonition,onwhomtheendsoftheageshavecome”(1Cor.10:11).Heretheapostlespeaksof“theendsoftheages”ashavingcomeuponthe
Jews.RussellseesthisasonemorereferencetothecloseoftheJewishage.“ItissometimessaidthatthewholeperiodbetweentheincarnationandtheendoftheworldisregardedintheNewTestamentas‘theendoftheage,’”Russellwrites.“Butthisbearsamanifestincongruityinitsveryfront.Howcouldtheendofaperiod...belongerthantheperiodofwhichitistheend?”6Laterin1CorinthiansPaultreatstheresurrectionofthesaints,whichisalso
soimportanttoChristianeschatologythatIwilldiscussitseparatelylater.FornowwewillcontinueabriefexcursionofrelevantpassagesintheEpistlesregardingthetime-frameofthecomingjudgment.
TreasuringUpWrath
InPaul’sEpistletotheRomans,wefindtwoimportantreferencestothedayoftheLordinchapter2:
Ordoyoudespisetherichesofhisgoodness,forbearance,andlongsuffering,notknowingthatthegoodnessofGodleadsyoutorepentance?ButinaccordancewithyourhardnessandyourimpenitentheartyouaretreasuringupforyourselfwrathinthedayofwrathandrevelationoftherighteousjudgmentofGod,who“willrendertoeachoneaccordingtohisdeeds”...(Rom.2:4–6).
...inthedaywhenGodwilljudgethesecretsofmenbyJesusChrist,accordingtomygospel(Rom.2:16).
Paulrefersto“thedayofwrath”and“thedaywhenGodwilljudgethesecretsofmen.”Presumablybothreferencesaretothesame“day.”Traditionalistsseethemasreferencestotheyetfuturelastjudgment.PreteristslikeRussellinterpretthesereferencesastheydoallotherreferencestothedayoftheLord:thisisthedarkdayofjudgmentthatbefellIsraelinthedestructionofJerusalem.Thoughtheabovetextslacktime-framereferences,theymayreasonablybe
linkedtolaterreferencesPaulmakesinthesameepistle:“Anddothis,knowingthetime,thatnowitishightimetoawakeoutofsleep;fornowoursalvationisnearerthanwhenwefirstbelieved.Thenightisfarspent,thedayisathand.Thereforeletuscastofftheworksofdarkness,andletusputonthearmoroflight”(Rom.13:11–12).Thispassageissomewhatenigmatic.Paulassumesthathisreadersknowthe
time.CharlesHodgeunderstandsthistomeansimplythatthereadersunderstoodsomethingofthesignificanceoftheredemptive-historicaltimeinwhichtheylived.Paulthengivesawake-upcallbasedontherelativenearnessofsalvation—itwasnearerthanwhentheyfirstbelieved.Hodgeprovidesthreealternativeinterpretationsofthispassage:
...Thefirstis,thatitmeansthatthetimeofsalvation,orspecialfavourtotheGentiles,andofthedestructionoftheJews,wasfastapproaching....Butforthisthereisnofoundationinthesimplemeaningofthewords,norinthecontext.PaulevidentlyreferstosomethingofmoregeneralandpermanentinterestthantheoverthrowoftheJewishnation,andtheconsequentfreedomoftheGentileconvertsfromtheirpersecutions.Thenightthatwasfarspent,wasnotthenightofsorrowarisingfromJewishbigotry;andthedaythatwasathandwassomethingbrighterandbetterthandeliverancefromitspower.Asecondinterpretation...is,thatthereferenceistothesecondadventofChrist.ItisassumedthattheearlyChristians,andeventheinspiredapostles,wereundertheconstantimpressionthatChristwastoappearinpersonfortheestablishmentofhiskingdom,beforethatgenerationpassedaway....Thethirdandmostcommon,aswellasthemostnaturalinterpretationofthispassageis,thatPaul
meantsimplytoremindthemthatthetimeofdeliverancewasnear....Thesalvation,therefore,hereintended,istheconsummationoftheworkofChristintheirdeliverancefromthispresentevilworld,andintroductionintothepurityandblessednessofheaven.7
Ofhisthreeoptions,Hodgefavorsthethird:thenearnessofthebelieverstoenteringintotheirheavenlyrest.Hisfirsttwooptions,whichhesharplydifferentiates,arecombinedbypreterists.ThedifficultywiththethirdoptionisthatPauldoesnotordinarilyspeakofredemptive“time”inthismanner.Hodgeisconcernedabouttheproblemsfacedinoptions1and2ofunfulfilledprophecy,andthisalmostforceshimtochooseoption3.C.K.Barretttakesadifferentview:
...Like“time,”“hour”isaneschatologicalterm,thoughitisnotcharacteristicofPaul....“Sleep”tooisametaphorwhichoftenoccursineschatologicaladmonitions(e.g.,1Thess.5:6–10).MenwholiveontheedgeoftheAgetoComecannotaffordtorelaxtheirvigilance....butPaulisnotthinkingofsalvationinapietisticwayassomethingthathappenstousinourexperience,butasauniversaleschatologicalevent.ThelapseoftimebetweentheconversionofPaulandofhisreadersandthemomentofwritingisasignificantproportionofthetotalintervalbetweentheresurrectionofJesusandhisparousiaatthelastday....Paulmeansthatthisagehasalmostrunitscourse,andthataccordinglytheAgetoComemustvery
soondawn.8
RussellcanvassesotherNewTestamentEpistles.HecitestworeferencesinPaul’sLettertotheColossians:“WhenChristwhoisourlifeappears,thenyoualsowillappearwithhiminglory....BecauseofthesethingsthewrathofGodiscominguponthesonsofdisobedience...”(Col.3:4,6).RussellseesalinkbetweenthesetextsinColossiansandPaul’steachingin
Romans8:19regardingtheglorythatisabouttoberevealed.Heseesthisasanallusiontothesameeventandthesametimeperiod.AgainthecontrastismentionedbetweenthecominggloryofthepeopleofGodandthecomingwrathontheenemiesofGod.
GatheringTogetherAllThings
ThenRussellturnshisattentiontoPaul’sLettertotheEphesians:
Inhimwehaveredemptionthroughhisblood,theforgivenessofsins,accordingtotherichesofhisgracewhichhemadetoaboundtowardusinallwisdomandprudence,havingmadeknowntousthemysteryofhiswill,accordingtohisgoodpleasurewhichhepurposedinhimself,thatinthedispensationofthefullnessofthetimeshemightgathertogetherinoneallthingsinChrist,bothwhichareinheavenandwhichareonearth...(Eph.1:7–10).
Twoelementsofthispassagerelatetotheissueathand.Thefirstelementisthetermmystery.Thisterm,afavoriteofPaul’s,referstothatwhichoncewashiddenbutisnowbeingrevealed.Thechiefmysteryofwhichhespeaks(particularlyinColossians)istheinclusionoftheGentilesinthebodyofChrist.ThesecondelementisPaul’sreferenceto“thedispensationofthefullnessofthetimes.”Thetermdispensationmaybetranslatedhere“economy.”Thiseconomyisrelatedto“thefullnessofthetimes”andincludesthegatheringtogetherinoneallthingsinChrist.Russellsaysofthis:
HesawthebarriersofseparationbetweenJewandGentile,theantipathiesofraces,“themiddlewallofpartition,”brokendownbyChrist,andonegreatfamilyorbrotherhoodformedoutofallnations,andkindreds,andpeoples,andtongues,undertheall-reconcilingandunitingpoweroftheatoningblood.Wecannotbemistaken,then,inunderstandingthismysteryofthe“gatheringtogetherinoneof
allthingsinChrist”asthesamewhichismorefullyexplainedinchapter3:5,6,“themysterywhichinotherageswasnotmadeknownuntothesonsofmen,asitisnowrevealeduntohisholyapostlesandprophetsbytheSpirit;thattheGentilesshouldbefellow-heirs,andofthesamebody,andpartakersofhispromiseinChristbythegospel.”Thisistheunification,“thesummingup,”orconsummation,towhichtheapostlemakessuchfrequentreferenceinthisepistle....9
C.LeslieMittoncommentsonEphesians1:7–10thattheplanforthefullnessoftimeisastrategycarefullydesignedbyGodandrootedinhiseternalplan.“ItwassomethingwhichGodhadlongintended,”Mittonsays,“somethinghewaitedtoimplementatthatprecisemomentwhenChrist’spresenceonearthwouldprovetobemosttimelyandeffective....Hewouldcomewhenthetimewasjustopportuneforhimtomakethemaximumimpact....Greekhadmorethanonewordfor‘time.’Thewordusedhereisonewhichwouldnotbeusedforavagueperiodoftime,amerelyuneventfulaccumulationofminutes,hoursanddays,butratherforsome‘time’ormomentofintensesignificance.”10MittonseesthelinkbetweenthesewordsandthewordsofJesusinMark
1:15:“Thetimeisfulfilled.”Russellseesitasareferenceto“theregeneration”ortimesofrefreshingmentionedinMatthew19:28and“thetimesofrestoration”mentionedinActs3:21.RussellarguesthatalloftheseeventstakeplaceatthecloseoftheJewishage.HecitestheobservationofW.J.ConybeareandJ.S.Howsonconcerning“theagestocome”mentionedinEphesians2:7:“‘Intheageswhicharecoming’;viz.thetimeofChrist’sperfecttriumphoverevil,alwayscontemplatedintheNewTestamentasnearathand.”11ReferencestotheparousiainthePastoralEpistlesarenumerous.Russell’slist
ofthesereferencestothelasttimesisreproducedintable4.1.Russellconcludesthatalloftheseversesrefertothesameperiodortime.Alleitherassumeordirectlyaffirmthattheirtime-frameisnotfardistant,thattheymustoccurwithinthelifetimeofthegenerationthatrejectedChrist,andthatthedestructionofJerusalemisthecloseoftheage,theend,andthedayoftheLord.12
Table4.1ReferencestotheLastTimes
TheEndoftheAge
Matt.13:39 Theharvestistheendoftheage.
Matt.13:40 Soitwillbeattheendofthisage.
Matt.13:49 Soitwillbeattheendoftheage.
Matt.24:3 WhatwillbethesignofYourcoming,andoftheendoftheage?
Matt.28:20 Iamwithyoualways,eventotheendoftheage.
Heb.9:26 Butnow,onceattheendoftheages,Hehasappeared.
TheEnd
Matt.10:22 Hewhoendurestotheendwillbesaved.
Matt.24:6 Buttheendisnotyet.
Matt.24:13 Hewhoendurestotheendshallbesaved.
Matt.24:14 Thentheendwillcome.
1Cor.3:13 Thedaywilldeclareit.
Heb.10:25 YouseetheDayapproaching.
ThatDay
Matt.7:22 ManywillsaytoMeinthatday,“Lord,Lord.”
Matt.24:36 Butofthatdayandhournooneknows.
Luke10:12 ItwillbemoretolerableinthatDayforSodom.
Luke21:34 Thatdaycomesonyouunexpectedly.
1Thess.5:4 ThatthisDayshouldovertakeyouasathief.
2Thess.2:3 ThatDaywillnotcomeunlessthefallingawaycomesfirst.
2Tim.1:12 HeisabletokeepwhatIhavecommittedtoHimuntilthatDay.
2Tim.1:18 ThathemayfindmercyfromtheLordinthatDay.
2Tim.4:8 Thecrown...whichtheLord...willgivetomeonthatDay.
TheDayoftheLord
1Cor.1:8 ThatyoumaybeblamelessinthedayofourLordJesusChrist.
1Cor.5:5 ThathisspiritmaybesavedinthedayoftheLordJesus.
2Cor.1:14 Youalsoareours,inthedayoftheLordJesus.
Phil.2:16 ThatImayrejoiceinthedayofChrist.
1Thess.5:2 ThedayoftheLordsocomesasathiefinthenight.
TheDayofGod
2Pet.3:12 LookingforandhasteningthecomingofthedayofGod.
TheGreatDay
Acts2:20 ThegreatandnotabledayoftheLord.
Jude6 Thejudgmentofthegreatday.
Rev.6:17 ThegreatdayofHiswrathhascome.
Rev.16:14 ThebattleofthatgreatdayofGodAlmighty.
TheDayofWrath
Rom.2:5 Treasuringupforyourselfwrathinthedayofwrath.
Rev.6:17 ThegreatdayofHiswrathhascome.
TheDayofJudgment
Matt.10:15 Itwillbemoretolerable...inthedayofjudgment.
Matt.11:22 Itwillbemoretolerable...inthedayofjudgment.
Matt.11:24 Itshallbemoretolerable...inthedayofjudgment.
Matt.12:36 Theywillgiveaccountofitinthedayofjudgment.
2Pet.2:9 Toreservetheunjust...forthedayofjudgment.
2Pet.3:7 Thedayofjudgmentandperditionofungodlymen.
1John4:17 Thatwemayhaveboldnessinthedayofjudgment.
TheDayofRedemption
Eph.4:30 Youweresealedforthedayofredemption.
TheLastDay
John6:39 Ishouldraiseitupatthelastday.
John6:40 Iwillraisehimupatthelastday.
John6:44 Iwillraisehimupatthelastday.
John6:54 Iwillraisehimupatthelastday.
John11:24 Hewillriseagainintheresurrectionatthelastday.
Closelyconnectedwiththetextsthatrefertothelastdaysarethosethatrefertotheapostasythatistocome.Russellsuppliesanevenlongercatalogueofreferencestofalseprophets,falseChrists,falseteachers,falseapostles,deceivers,andsoforth.Regardingthesereferences,Russellreachesthefollowingconclusions:
1. Thattheyallrefertothesamegreatdefectionfromthefaith,designatedbySt.Paul“theapostasy.”
2. Thatthisapostasywastobeverygeneralandwidespread.3. Thatitwastobemarkedbyanextremedepravityofmorals,
particularlybysinsoftheflesh.4. Thatitwastobeaccompaniedbypretensionstomiraculouspower.5. Thatitwaslargely,ifnotchiefly,Jewishinitscharacter.6. ThatitrejectedtheincarnationanddivinityoftheLordJesusChrist—
i.e.,wasthepredictedAntichrist.
7. Thatitwastoreachitsfulldevelopmentinthe“lasttimes,”andwastobetheprecursoroftheparousia.13
RussellnotesthattheevilsPaulwarnsaboutinthefuturearerepresentedbybothJohnandPeterasbeingactuallypresent.TheauthorofHebrewssaysGodhasspokenbyhisSon“intheselastdays”
(1:2).ClearlythepassageassignsJesus’searthlyministrytothe“lastdays.”Mightthequalifierthesehintatadistinctionbetweenthelastdaysthatincludedtheincarnationandsomeotherstill-futurelastdays?Regardlesssuchaninference,onethingiscertain:Jesus’searthlyministrybelongedtosomeaspectorcategoryofthelastdays.
AppearingaSecondTime
WhileexploringtherestoftheEpistletotheHebrews,wenotesomeimportanttexts,particularlyinchapters9–10.
Thereforeitwasnecessarythatthecopiesofthethingsintheheavensshouldbepurifiedwiththese,buttheheavenlythingsthemselveswithbettersacrificesthanthese.ForChristhasnotenteredtheholyplacesmadewithhands,whicharecopiesofthetrue,butintoheavenitself,nowtoappearinthepresenceofGodforus;notthatheshouldofferhimselfoften,asthehighpriestenterstheMostHolyPlaceeveryyearwithbloodofanother—hethenwouldhavehadtosufferoftensincethefoundationoftheworld;butnow,onceattheendoftheages,hehasappearedtoputawaysinbythesacrificeofhimself.Andasitisappointedformentodieonce,butafterthisthejudgment,soChristwasofferedoncetobearthesinsofmany.Tothosewhoeagerlywaitforhimhewillappearasecondtime,apartfromsin,forsalvation(Heb.9:23–28).
ThispassagereferstoboththefirstandsecondappearancesofChrist.Thecontextforhisfirstappearanceis“theendoftheages.”Yethisfollowersarestillwaitingforhimtoappearasecondtime.SimonJ.Kistemakercomments:“WhendidChristcome?TheauthorofHebrewswrites,‘attheendoftheages.’Thisdoesnothavetorefertotheendoftime,becauseinthesamecontextthewritersaysthatChristwillappearasecondtime(v.28).TheexpressionapparentlypointstothetotalimpactofChrist’scomingandtheeffectofhisatoningwork.Andbecauseofhistriumphoversin,weliveinthelastage.”14Thisexpositionisabitcurious.Kistemakerdrawstheconclusionthatthe
expression“endoftheages”neednotrefertotheendoftime.Thisseemstobemorethanamildunderstatement.IfChrist’sfirstcomingat“theendoftheages”hasalreadyoccurredandifconsiderabletimehaselapsedsincethatcoming,thenitisimpossibletoidentify“theendoftheages”withtheendoftime.Ifthe
secondappearingofChristherereferstohisjudgmentonJerusalem,itwouldstillfitintheframeworkof“theendoftheages”thatisnottheendofalltime.IfthesecondcomingreferstoJesus’scomingattheendoftime,thenwemustdistinguishbetweentwodifferent“lasttimes.”Orwemustcompressthetimethathaselapsedsincetheatonementintoalengthyinterimoflasttimesandconsiderourpresenttimeasacontinuationofthelastage,asKistemakerapparentlydoes.PhilipEdgcumbeHughestreatsthepassageinsimilarfashion:“Allthat
precededtheadventofChristwasleadinguptothisclimacticeventwhichisthefocalpointforthetrueperspectiveofallhumanhistory.Withhiscomingthelongyearsofdesireandexpectationareendedandthelast,theeschatological,eraofthepresentworldisinaugurated(cf.Heb.1:2).Consequently,wewholivesincehiscomingarethose‘uponwhomtheendoftheagehascome’(1Cor.10:11).”15IntheverynextchapterofHebrews,theauthorspeaksofthe“Day
approaching”:
Therefore,brethren,havingboldnesstoentertheHoliestbythebloodofJesus,byanewandlivingwaywhichheconsecratedforus,throughtheveil,thatis,hisflesh,andhavingaHighPriestoverthehouseofGod,letusdrawnearwithatrueheartinfullassuranceoffaith,havingourheartssprinkledfromanevilconscienceandourbodieswashedwithpurewater.Letusholdfasttheconfessionofourhopewithoutwavering,forhewhopromisedisfaithful.Andletusconsideroneanotherinordertostiruploveandgoodworks,notforsakingtheassemblingofourselvestogether,asisthemannerofsome,butexhortingoneanother,andsomuchthemoreasyouseetheDayapproaching(Heb.10:19–25).
ThistextincludesanexhortationthatfollowstheteachingoftheperfectsacrificeofChrist.Theexhortationisintensifiedinlightofthereader’svisionoftheapproachingday.Russell,ofcourse,seesthisasareferencetothenearnessofJerusalem’sdestructionandallthatthisentails.ThenearnessofChrist’scomingisreinforcedinverse37:“Foryetalittlewhile,andhewhoiscomingwillcomeandwillnottarry”(Heb.10:37).ItisdifficulttoescapetheconclusionthattheauthorofHebrewslinksthe
approachingdaywiththecomingofChristandsaysthatbotharecloseathand.Hughestreatsthisinthefollowingmanner:
Whenspokenofinthisabsolutemanner,“theDay”canmeanonlythelastday,thatultimateeschatologicalday,whichisthedayofreckoningandjudgment,knownastheDayoftheLord....ManyhavesuggestedthattheremaybeamoreproximatereferencebyourauthortotheimpendingdestructionofJerusalemandwithitoftheoldorderofthings(AD70),inadditiontotheeschatologicalconnotationoftheterm....While,however,theeventsofAD70wereinvestedwiththemostportentoussignificance(cf.Matt.24),andinthepropheticperspectivetherecouldbelesser“daysoftheLord”whichpointedtothecertaintyoftheultimatedayofjudgment,“theDay,”withoutanyqualificationandthereforeemphaticintheabsolutenessofitssignificance,mustbethedayof
Christ’sreturnwhenthispresentagewillbebroughttoitsconclusionandhiseverlastingkingdomoverthenewheavenandthenewearthuniversallyestablished.16
Hughesisemphaticthat“theDay”referstothefinalandconsummatedayoftheLord.Yethespeaksof“lesser”daysoftheLordsuchastheoneinAD70.Hefeelssomeoftheweightofthelanguageattachedtothiscomingdaysuggestingitsnearness.Hewrites:
But,itmaybeobjected,ifthewriterofHebrewsandhisreadersdidindeedbelievethatthisDaywasdrawingnear,itsnon-arrivalwouldseemtohavefalsifiedtheirexpectation.NearlytwomillenniahavenowpassedandtheDayhasnotcome:canitseriouslyberegardedasotherthanamistakenexpectationandanon-event?This,however,isnotatallanewprobleminthechurch....JustasthepromiseofthefirstcomingofChrist,thoughapparentlylongdelayedinitsfulfillment,wasprovedtruebytheevent,soitwillbewiththepromiseconcerningthedayofhissecondcoming....“TheperiodbetweenthefirstadventofChristandhisparousiaistheend-time,the‘lastdays,’the‘lasthour,’”writesF.F.Bruce.“Whateverthedurationoftheperiodmaybe,forfaith‘thetimeisathand’(Rev.1:3).EachsuccessiveChristiangenerationiscalledupontoliveasthegenerationoftheend-time,ifitistoliveasaChristiangeneration.”17
Thislineofreasoningbegsthequestion.Ifindeedthepromiseisfulfilledwhentheeventtranspires,thisdoesnotmeanthatthepromisedtime-frameisalsoproventrue.WhenF.F.Brucespeaksoffaithmakingthetimebe“athand,”thissoundsalltoomuchlikeRudolfBultmann’sfamoustheologyoftimelessness,whichremovestheobjectoffaithfromtherealmofrealhistoryandconsignsittoasupertemporalrealmofthealwayspresenthicetnunc.Russellcounteredsimilartheoriesinhisownday.“ItisnottruethattheParousia‘isalwaysnear,andalwaysreadytobreakforthuponthechurch,’”hesays,“anymorethanthatthebirthofChrist,hiscrucifixion,orhisresurrection,isalwaysreadytobreakforth.”18
5WHATABOUTTHEDESTRUCTIONOF
JERUSALEM?
Notonestoneshallbelefthereuponanother,thatshallnotbethrowndown.
Matthew24:2
TheNewTestamentwaswritteninGreekratherthanHebrew.ThiswasthecasebecausePalestinewasageopoliticalfootball,tossedtoandfroamongtheworldpowersofantiquity.Thistinynation,aboutthesizeofMarylandandonlyslightlylargerthanVermont,wassituatedonalandbridgethatconnectedthreecontinents,Europe,Asia,andAfrica.Whoevercontrolledthisbridgecontrolledthetraderoutesconnectingthesecontinents.IsraelexperiencedconquestanddominationbytheEgyptians,theAssyrians,
theBabylonians,thePersians,theGreeks,andtheRomans,tonamebutafew.TheNewTestamentwaswritteninGreekasaconsequenceofthemilitarytriumphsofAlexandertheGreat.AlexanderwasastudentofAristotle.Aristotle’spassionformetaphysicalandscientificunitywastranslatedbyhismostillustriouspupilintoapassionforculturalunity.PartofhiszealinmilitaryconquestwastoexportGreekculturetotheentireMediterraneanworld.AtthecloseoftheOldTestamentperiod,Palestinewasunderthecontrolof
thePersianEmpire.InthefourthcenturyBC,AlexanderconqueredthePersians.HealsowenttoEgyptandestablishedthecityofAlexandria(331),whichbecameacenterofHellenisticphilosophyandculture.In323AlexandermarchedtoBabylon,wherehecontractedafeveranddiedatage32.Hiskingdomwasdividedamonghisgenerals,themostimportantofwhomproducedthePtolemaicdynastyinEgyptandtheSeleuciddynastyinSyriaandtheeast.
PalestinewasannexedtoEgyptbyPtolemyIin320BC.ThisregimeallowedtheJewishpeopletopracticetheirreligionfreely.In198BCAntiochusIIIoftheSeleuciddynastywrestedcontrolofPalestinefromthePtolemiesandannexedittoSyria.TheSeleucidsembarkedonasystematicprogramofHellenizingPalestine.In175BCtheHellenizationprocessreacheditsapex(ornadir)under
AntiochusEpiphanes,whocapturedJerusalem,plunderedthetemple,andmassacredmanyofitscitizens.HeoutlawedobservanceoftheSabbath,thepracticeofcircumcision,andthepossessionoftheHebrewScriptures,declaringallthreetobecapitalcrimes.TheseextrememeasuresgaverisetotheMaccabeanrevolt,whichfinallyledtofreedomin142BC.ThisfreedomendureduntilPalestinewasoncemoreconqueredbyaforeignpower.PalestinewassubjugatedbytheRomansin63BC.ThoughtheNewTestamentwaswrittenintheGreeklanguage,itwaswritten
duringaperiodofRomandominion.JesuswasbornduringthereignofCaesarAugustusandlivedwhentheRomanofficialPontiusPilatewasprocurator.ThehistoryoftheNewTestamenteraisintertwinedwiththehistoryoftheRomanEmpire.Intherootsoftheseintertwininghistories,thereisanirony.TheProphet
IsaiahwascalledintheyearthatKingUzziahdied(Isa.6:1–13).Thatyearhasbeencitedas758BC.“ItwasinthisyearthatIsraelasapeoplewasgivenuptohardnessofheart,andasakingdomandcountrytodevastationandannihilationbytheimperialpoweroftheworld,”FranzDelitzschwrites.“Howsignificantafact,asJeromeobservesinconnectionwiththispassage,thattheyearofUzziah’sdeathshouldbetheyearinwhichRomuluswasborn;andthatitwasonlyashorttimeafterthedeathofUzziah(viz.754BCaccordingtoVarro’schronology)thatRomeitselfwasfounded!ThenationalgloryofIsraeldiedoutwithkingUzziah,andhasneverrevivedtothisday.”1AccordingtosomeinterpretersoftheOldTestament,theProphetDaniel
predictedthedominionoftheRomanEmpireinhisinterpretationofNebuchadnezzar’sdreamofthecolossus(Dan.4:19–27).SomeseethefourempiresdenotedthereasthoseofBabylon,Medo-Persia,Greece,andRome.2PalestinecameunderRomandominionin63BCwhenPompeytook
possessionofJerusalem.PompeyisfamousinWesternhistoryforbeingpartoftheFirstTriumviratein60BCwithJuliusCaesarandCrassus.Afterdissensiondevelopedamongthethree,Caesaremergedasthedictator.InWilliamShakespeare’sJuliusCaesar,Caesar,assassinatedintheRomanForumbyBrutus,fallsdeadatthefootofthebustofPompey.
WithPompey’sconquestofJerusalem,theJewishkingshipwasabolishedandJudeawasrequiredtopaytributetoRome.ForatimetheJewswereallowedtohavenativerulers.DuringthereignofJuliusCaesar,concessionsweremadetotheJewsregardingtaxationandexemptionfrommilitaryservice.CaesarnamedAntipater,anIdumeanruler,asprocuratoroftheJewishnation.AfterthedeathofCaesar,theSecondTriumviratewasformedbyMarkAnthony(ofAnthonyandCleopatrafame),Octavian(wholaterbecameCaesarAugustus),andLepidus.In27BCOctavianbecamethefirstemperorofRome,andhereigneduntilhis
deathinAD14.HewassucceededbyhisadoptedsonTiberius,whoreigneduntilAD37.TiberiuswasfollowedbythenotoriousCaligula,whoheldpoweruntilhewasassassinatedinAD41.HewasfollowedbyClaudiusI,whoreigneduntilAD54.ClaudiuswassucceededbyNero,whoruledfromAD54to68.FollowingthedeathofNero,theempirewasinupheavalandapowerstruggle
ensued.NerowassucceededbyGalba,whowassoonkilledandreplacedbyOthoinAD69.He,inturn,waskilledandreplacedbyVitellius.VitelliushadthesupportoftheSenate,butnotthemilitary.FollowersofVespasiancapturedRome,killedVitellius,andproclaimedVespasianemperor.VespasianruledfromAD69to79andwasemperoratthetimeofJerusalem’sdestruction.
TheJewishHistorian
AneyewitnesstoJerusalem’sdestructionwasFlaviusJosephus.JamesL.PriceoffersthefollowingsynopsisofthisJewishhistorian’slifeandcareer:
JosephuswasbornatJerusaleminAD37–38,thefirstyearoftheEmperorCaligula’sreign.Thetimeofhisdeathisnotknown,butheoutlivedHerodAgrippa,forJosephusrecordsthelatter’sdeathinAD100.Josephuswasthesonofapriest.HeclaimeddescentfromtheHasmoneans.AsayoungmanhewasattractedbytheteachingsofvariouspartiesandsectsinPalestinebuteventuallyhejoinedthepopularparty,thePharisees.DuringtheprocuratorshipofFelix,JosephuswenttoRometoobtainthereleaseofsomearrestedpriests.ShortlyafterhisreturntheJewishwarbegan.PerhapstheimpressionsofRomanpowerwhichhehadgainedledJosephustoattempttothwartthefoolishrebellioninPalestine.ButhewassweptintothemaelstromasapartisanandforatimeheldapositionofmilitaryleadershipinGalilee.AftertheRomanvictoriesinthisregionandhisarrest,Josephussoughttomediatebetweenthewarringgroups.ItwasnotapopularpositionforhewassuspectedbytheRomansandhatedbytheJews.Hewasable,nonetheless,toobservemuchofthewaratfirsthand.AfterwardshewitnessedthetriumphalprocessionofTitusatRome.Helivedthere,untilhisdeath,inordertoreceivecitizenshipandvariousprivileges,andtowritehis“apologies.”HeassumedthefamilynameoftheEmperorVespasian,Flavius.3
Josephuswrotefourmajorworks:TheJewishWar,TheAntiquitiesoftheJews,TheLifeofFlaviusJosephus,andAgainstApion.4Hewasacontroversialperson,asPricehasnoted,andwaszealoustovindicatebothhimselfasahistorianandhispeople,theJews.Hiscredibilityasahistorianwassharplycriticizedbynineteenth-centuryscholars.Hiswritingsreflectacertainbiasattimesandaformofself-aggrandizement.Hehasbeenchargedwithexaggerating,particularlythenumbersofthoseslaininvariousbattlesandevenmoreparticularlythenumberofpeoplekilledintheRomans’conquestofJerusalem.YetJosephusprovidesaninvaluableresourceforhistimes,especiallyasaneyewitnesstothefallofJerusalem.“WithoutthewritingsofJosephus,aconnectednarrativeofJewishhistoryinNewTestamenttimeswouldbeimpossible,”saysPrice.“Fewwoulddenyhimaplaceamongthegreatesthistoriansoftheancientworld.”5InhisprefacetoTheWarsoftheJews,Josephuspromisesanaccountthatis
accuratewithrespecttoboththeRomanconquerorsandhisJewishcountrymen:
Butifanyonemakesanunjustaccusationagainstus,whenwespeaksopassionatelyaboutthetyrants,ortherobbers,orsorelybewailthemisfortunesofourcountry,lethimindulgemyaffectionsherein,thoughitbecontrarytotherulesforwritinghistory;becauseithadsocometopass,thatourcityJerusalemhadarrivedatahigherdegreeoffelicitythananyothercityundertheRomangovernment,andyetatlastfellintothesorestofcalamitiesagain.Accordinglyitappearstome,thatthemisfortunesofallmen,fromthebeginningoftheworld,iftheybecomparedtotheseoftheJews,arenotsoconsiderableastheywere;whiletheauthorsofthemwerenotforeignersneither.Thismakesitimpossibleformetocontainmylamentations.But,ifanyonebeinflexibleinhiscensuresofme,lethimattributethefactsthemselvestothehistoricalpart,andthelamentationstothewriterhimselfonly.6
JosephuswaspassionatelyinvolvedinhisownaccountoftheRomanconquestofPalestine.Hehadaprofoundaffectionforhispeople,andhewaspersonallyinvolvedinthewaritself.ThedestructionofJerusalemdidnotoccurovernightbutwasthefinalblowinalengthyseriesofmilitaryexpeditionsagainstPalestine.BeforethesiegeofJerusalem,manybattleswerefoughtastheRomanssystematicallyandrelentlesslymovedacrossthelandlikeajuggernaut.Josephus’saccountofmanypreliminaryeventsreadslikeachronicleoffulfilledbiblicalprophecy.Hereferstotheriseoffalseprophets(2.13),amassacreinJerusalem(2.14),theslaughterofJewsinAlexandria(2.18),andtheinvasionofGalilee(3.4).OneofJosephus’smostfascinatingaccountsisthatofthesiegeandconquest
ofthecityofJotapata.HeprovidesvividinsightsintothestrategiesandtacticsemployedbytheRomanmilitary.Josephushimselfwasthegeneralinchargeof
defendingthecity.TheRomanattackerswereledbyVespasian(whowasnotyetemperor).Vespasiansurroundedthecitywithhistroopsandlaidsiegetoit.JosephusdescribesthebatteringramtheRomansusedonJotapata’s
fortifications:
Thebatteringramisavastbeamofwoodlikethemastofaship;itsfore-partisarmedwithathickpieceofironattheheadofit,whichissocarvedastobeliketheheadofaram,whenceitsnameistaken.Thisramisslungintheairbyropespassingoveritsmiddle,andishunglikethebalanceinapairofscalesfromanotherbeam,andbracedbystrongbeamsthatpassonbothsidesofitinthenatureofacross.Whenthisramispulledbackwardbyagreatnumberofmenwithunitedforce,andthenthrustforwardbythesamemen,withamightynoise,itbattersthewallswiththatironpartwhichisprominent;noristhereanytowersostrong,orwallssobroad,thatcanresistanymorethanitsfirstbatteries,butallareforcedtoyieldtoitatlast.7
JosephustellsoftheJews’ingeniousploystothwartthebattering-ramattack,suchaspouringsacksofchaffthatturnedasidethethrustsoftheram,andpouringscaldingoilontheRomansoldiersoperatingtheram.Thesiegewentonforoverforty-fivedaysuntiltheRomansbrokeinto
Jotapataandslayeditsinhabitants.TheRomanstookcaptive1,200womenandchildren,accordingtoJosephus.Duringthecourseoftheseevents,40,000wereslain.Josephushimselfsurvivedbyhidinginadeeppit.Buthewasbetrayedandwastakencaptive.Accordingtohisownaccount,JosephuswassparedbyVespasianbecauseofhisvaliantbehaviorduringthesiege.Thisledtoalong-termpersonalrelationshipbetweenJosephusandboth
VespasianandhissonTitus.ThisdevelopmentenabledJosephustoactasawitnesstobothsidesintheensuingstruggleoverJerusalem.Inthecrisissurroundinghiscapture,Josephusclaimedtohavedreamsofpropheticimport.Hisdescriptionrevealsmuchofhisownself-consciousnessregardingthedramaoftheseevents:
NowJosephuswasabletogiveshrewdconjecturesabouttheinterpretationofsuchdreamsashavebeenambiguouslydeliveredbyGod.Moreover,hewasnotunacquaintedwiththepropheciescontainedinthesacredbooks,asbeingapriesthimself,andoftheposterityofpriests:andjustthenwasheinanecstasy;andsettingbeforehimthetremendousimagesofthedreamshehadlatelyhad,heputupasecretprayertoGod,andsaid,“Sinceitpleaseththee,whohastcreatedtheJewishnation,todepressthesame,andsincealltheirgoodfortuneisgoneovertotheRomans;andsincethouhastmadechoiceofthissoulofminetoforetellwhatistocometopasshereafter,Iwillinglygivethemmyhands,andamcontenttolive.AndIprotestopenly,thatIdonotgoovertotheRomansasadeserteroftheJews,butasaministerfromthee.”8
ThistestimonyrevealsthatJosephusthoughtofhimselfasageneral,astatesman,ahistorian,apriest,andaprophet.ItalsoindicatesthathesawthehandofProvidenceinthetragiceventsunfoldingbeforehisveryeyes.
ThroughouthishistoryheindicatesthatthefortuneoftheJewsisthedirectresultofdivinechastisement.Inbook4JosephusrecountshowcertainEdomitesdesecratedthetempleinJerusalemandhowtheZealotsfulfilledancientprophecies:
Thesemen,therefore,trampleduponallthelawsofman,andlaughedatthelawsofGod;andfortheoraclesoftheprophets,theyridiculedthemasthetricksofjugglers;yetdidtheseprophetsforetellmanythingsconcerning[therewardsof]virtue,and[punishmentsof]vice,whichwhenthesezealotsviolated,theyoccasionedthefulfillingofthoseverypropheciesbelongingtotheirowncountry:fortherewasacertainancientoracleofthosemen,thatthecityshouldthenbetakenandthesanctuaryburnt,byrightofwar,whenaseditionshouldinvadetheJews,andtheirownhandshouldpollutethetempleofGod.Now,whilethesezealotsdidnot[quite]disbelievethesepredictions,theymadethemselvestheinstrumentsoftheiraccomplishment.9
TheRomanAttackontheCity
JosephusthentellshowtheinvasionwasinterruptedwhenthenewsarrivedofthedeathofNero.AfterVitelliuswaskilledandVespasianwasproclaimedemperorbyhistroops,VespasianmadeajourneytoRome.HissonTitusreturnedtoJerusalemtocarryonthewaragainsttheJews.MeanwhileVespasianreleasedJosephusfromhisbonds.Inbook5JosephusprovidesavividdescriptionofJerusalematthetimeofthe
war,givingsuchdetailsasthesizeofthewallsandthetowers.HecarefullydescribesthetempleitselfandthesizeofthestonesHerodhadusedinitsconstruction.Someofthestoneswereforty-fivecubitslong,fivecubitshigh,andsixcubitswide.InanearlyattacktheRomanscaststonesandshotarrowsatthecity.The
barrageofstonesfellonthecitylikehail.JosephusrecordstheJews’strangeresponse:“...theyatfirstwatchedthecomingofthestone,foritwasofawhitecolor,andcouldthereforenotonlybeperceivedbythegreatnoiseitmade,butcouldbeseenalsobeforeitcamebyitsbrightness;accordinglythewatchmenthatsatuponthetowersgavethemnoticewhentheenginewasletgo,andthestonecamefromit,andcriedoutaloudintheirowncountrylanguage,‘THESTONECOMETH’;sothosethatwereinitswaystoodoff,andthrewthemselvesdownupontheground;bywhichmeans,andbytheirthusguardingthemselves,thestonefelldownanddidthemnoharm.”10Thereisatextualdisputeconcerningtheoriginalwordingofthesentence
“Thestonecometh.”Certainmanuscriptsread“Thesoncometh.”J.StuartRussellseesgreatsignificanceinthelatterrendition,whichisprobablyoriginal.Hewrites:
ItcouldnotbutbewellknowntotheJewsthatthegreathopeandfaithoftheChristianswasthespeedycomingoftheSon.Itwasaboutthisverytime,accordingtoHegesippus,thatSt.James,thebrotherofourLord,publiclytestifiedinthetemplethat“theSonofmanwasabouttocomeinthecloudsofheaven,”andthensealedhistestimonywithhisblood.ItseemshighlyprobablethattheJews,intheirdefiantanddesperateblasphemy,whentheysawthewhitemasshurtlingthroughtheair,raisedtheribaldcry,“TheSoniscoming,”inmockeryoftheChristianhopeoftheParousia,towhichtheymighttracealudicrousresemblanceinthestrangeappearanceofthemissle.11
Inbook5Josephusrecordshisformerpleastohisownpeopletorepentoftheirsins.HesawthattheirfightwasultimatelynotagainsttheRomansbutagainstGod.“WhereforeIcannotbutsupposethatGodisfledoutofhissanctuary,andstandsonthesideofthoseagainstwhomyoufight,”Josephuswrites.“Nowevenaman,ifhebebutagoodman,willflyfromanimpurehouse,andwillhatethosethatareinit;anddoyoupersuadeyourselvesthatGodwillabidewithyouinyouriniquities,whoseesallsecretthings,andhearswhatiskeptmostprivate!”12IncastigatingtheJewsfortheirsins,Josephusclaimedthathisown
generationwasmorewickedthananygenerationbeforeit,anassessmentremarkablysimilartothatofJesus.Inbook6Josephusrehearsesthehorrorsthathadbefallentheinhabitantsof
JerusalemduringthesiegeunderTitus.Josephusdescribesawomanwho,inthemidstofthefaminecausedbythesiege,tookherbabywhohadbeensuckingatherbreastandkilledit.Shethenroastedherownchild,atehalfofitsbody,andofferedtheresttobystanders.Theyexpressedtheiruttercontemptforheractionsandleftthesceneinaspiritoftrembling.JosephusthendescribestheRomansburningthetempleandplacingJerusalem
undertheban:“Whiletheholyhousewasonfire,everythingwasplunderedthatcametohand,andtenthousandofthosethatwerecaughtwereslain;norwasthereacommiserationofanyage,oranyreverenceofgravity;butchildrenandoldmen,andprofanepersons,andpriests,wereallslaininthesamemanner;sothatthiswarwentroundallsortsofmen,andbroughtthemtodestruction....”13
Stars,Comets,andLights
Perhapsthemoststrange,evenbizarre,reportinJosephus’snarrativeisthesightingsofheavenlyapparitions:
Thuswerethemiserablepeoplepersuadedbythesedeceivers,andsuchasbeliedGodhimself;whiletheydidnotattend,norgivecredit,tothesignsthatweresoevidentanddidsoplainlyforetelltheirfuturedesolation;but,likemeninfatuated,withouteithereyestosee,ormindstoconsider,didnotregardthedenunciationsthatGodmadetothem.Thustherewasastarresemblingasword,which
stoodoverthecity,andacomet,thatcontinuedawholeyear.Thusalso,beforetheJews’rebellion,andbeforethosecommotionswhichprecededthewar,whenthepeoplewerecomeingreatcrowdstothefeastofunleavenedbread,ontheeighthdayofthemonthXanthicus[Nisan],andattheninthhourofthenight,sogreatalightshoneroundthealtarandtheholyhouse,thatitappearedtobebrightdaytime;whichlightlastedforhalfanhour.Thislightseemedtobeagoodsigntotheunskilful,butwassointerpretedbythesacredscribes,astoportendthoseeventsthatfollowedimmediatelyuponit.Atthesamefestivalalso,aheifer,asshewasledbythehigh-priesttobesacrificed,broughtforthalambinthemidstofthetemple.14
JosephussaystheseastronomicalphenomenatriggeredfalsepropheciesofhopeforJerusalemanditspeople.Othershaveseeninthemadifferentsignificance.ThebrightlightshiningroundthetempleareamayberelatedtothepresenceoftheShekinaglory,thesignofGod’spresence.FalseprophetsreaditinmuchthesamewaythatfalseprophetsinOldTestamenttimesviewedthecomingdayoftheLord—asatimeofunqualifiedweal,adayofpurebrightnessandglory.Theymissedthedreadfuldarknessthatwouldaccompanyitasasignofjudgment.Thereferencetoaheifergivingbirthtoalambisbizarreindeed,tothepoint
ofraisingdoubtsaboutJosephus’saccuracyasahistorian.Itissignificant,however,thatsignsintheskywerereportedbyotherhistoriansofeventssurroundingthedestructionofJerusalem.TheRomanhistorianTacitus,forexample,writesthis:
ThehistoryonwhichIamenteringisthatofaperiodrichindisasters,terriblewithbattles,tornbycivilstruggles,horribleeveninpeace.Fouremperorsfellbythesword;therewerethreecivilwars,moreforeignwars,andoftenbothatthesametime.TherewassuccessintheEast,misfortuneintheWest.Illyricumwasdisturbed,theGallicprovinceswavering,Britainsubduedandimmediatelyletgo.TheSarmataeandSuebiroseagainstus;theDacianswonfamebydefeatsinflictedandsuffered;eventheParthianswerealmostrousedtoarmsthroughthetrickeryofapretendedNero.Moreover,Italywasdistressedbydisastersunknownbeforeorreturningafterthelapseofages.CitiesontherichfertileshoresofCampaniawereswalloweduporoverwhelmed;Romewasdevastatedbyconflagrations,inwhichhermostancientshrineswereconsumedandtheveryCapitolfiredbycitizen’shands....Theseawasfilledwithexiles,itscliffsmadefoulwiththebodiesofthedead.InRometherewasmoreawfulcruelty....Besidesthemanifoldmisfortunesthatbefellmankind,therewereprodigiesintheskyandonthe
earth,warningsgivenbythunderbolts,andpropheciesofthefuture,bothjoyfulandgloomy,uncertainandclear.ForneverwasitmorefullyprovedbyawfuldisastersoftheRomanpeopleorbyindubitablesignsthatthegodscarenotforoursafety,butforourpunishment.15
ThoughquestionsmightbeposedaboutcertainpointsinJosephus’saccountofsignsinthesky,itisneverthelessclearthatsomeofhistestimonyiscorroboratedbyothers.Perhapsmostsignificantishisreferencetothecometthatappearedintheskyandremainedforayear.GaryDeMarcomments:
Theappearanceofcometsintheskywasoftentakenasawarningofsomeapproachingcalamityorasignofchangeinexistingpoliticalstructures....Werethereany“signsfromheaven”priortoAD70?AcometappearedaroundAD60duringthe
reignofNero.Thepublicspeculatedthatsomechangeinthepoliticalscenewasimminent:“ThehistorianTacituswrote:‘AsifNerowerealreadydethroned,menbegantoaskwhomightbehissuccessor.’”Nerotookthecomet’s“threat”seriously.“...Nerotooknochancesasanotherhistorian,Suetonius,related:‘...AllchildrenofthecondemnedmenwerebanishedfromRome,andthenstarvedtodeathorpoisoned.’...Nerosurvivedthatcometbyseveralyears....”ThenHalley’sCometappearedinAD66.NotlongafterthisNerocommittedsuicide.HistorianshavelinkedtheappearanceofHalley’sComet,notonlywiththedeathofNero,butwiththedestructionofJerusalemfouryearslater.16
Inadditiontohisaccountofthecomet,thesword-likestar,andsoforth,Josephusprovidesamostremarkablerecordofanevenmoreastonishingcelestialoccurrence,onesoextraordinarythatthehistorianhimselfseemsreticentaboutmentioningit:
Besidesthese,afewdaysafterthatfeast,ontheone-and-twentiethdayofthemonthArtemisius[Jyar],acertainprodigiousandincrediblephenomenonappeared;Isupposetheaccountofitwouldseemtobeafable,wereitnotrelatedbythosethatsawit,andwerenottheeventsthatfolloweditofsoconsiderableanatureastodeservesuchsignals;for,beforesun-setting,chariotsandtroopsofsoldiersintheirarmorwereseenrunningaboutamongtheclouds,andsurroundingofcities.MoreoveratthatfeastwhichwecallPentecost,asthepriestsweregoingbynightintotheinner[courtofthe]temple,astheircustomwas,toperformtheirsacredministrations,theysaidthat,inthefirstplace,theyfeltaquaking,andheardagreatnoise,andafterthattheyheardasoundasofagreatmultitude,saying,“Letusremovehence.”17
Ezekiel’sStrangeVision
WhatisremarkableaboutthistestimonyisitssimilaritytoincidentsrelatedintheOldTestament.WhenEzekielwasacaptiveinBabylon,hehadavisionofthechariot-throneofGod.Thefearfulsignsaccompanyingthistheophanyincludedagreatsound:
Thelikenessofthefirmamentabovetheheadsofthelivingcreatureswaslikethecolorofanawesomecrystal,stretchedoutovertheirheads.Andunderthefirmamenttheirwingsspreadoutstraight,onetowardanother.Eachonehadtwowhichcoveredoneside,andeachonehadtwowhichcoveredtheothersideofthebody.Whentheywent,Iheardthenoiseoftheirwings,likethenoiseofmanywaters,likethevoiceoftheAlmighty,atumultlikethenoiseofanarmy;andwhentheystoodstill,theyletdowntheirwings.Avoicecamefromabovethefirmamentthatwasovertheirheads;whenevertheystood,theyletdowntheirwings.Andabovethefirmamentovertheirheadswasthelikenessofathrone,inappearancelikeasapphire
stone;onthelikenessofthethronewasalikenesswiththeappearanceofamanhighaboveit.AlsofromtheappearanceofhiswaistandupwardIsaw,asitwere,thecolorofamberwiththeappearanceoffireallaroundwithinit;andfromtheappearanceofhiswaistanddownwardIsaw,asitwere,theappearanceoffirewithbrightnessallaround.Liketheappearanceofarainbowinacloudonarainy
day,sowastheappearanceofthebrightnessallaroundit.ThiswastheappearanceofthelikenessofthegloryoftheLORD.SowhenIsawit,Ifellonmyface,andIheardavoiceofOnespeaking(Ezek.1:22–28).
Table5.1TheJudgmentonJerusalemaccordingtoHistory
Destructionofthetemple
Heavenlyphenomena
• Astarresemblingasword
• Acomet(Halley’sCometappearedinAD66)
• Abrightlightshiningaroundthealtarandthetemple
• Avisionofchariotsandsoldiersrunningaroundamongthecloudsandsurroundingcities
Earthlyphenomena(reportedbypriests)
• Aquaking
• Agreatnoise
• Thesoundofagreatmultitudesaying,“Letusremovehence.”
Thechariot-throneismentionedagainlaterinthebookofEzekiel.Inchap.10Ezekielsawthechariot-thronewithitsresplendentglorydepartingfromthetempleandfromJerusalemviatheEastGate.
Andthecherubimwereliftedup.ThiswasthelivingcreatureIsawbytheRiverChebar.Whenthecherubimwent,thewheelswentbesidethem;andwhenthecherubimliftedtheirwingstomountupfromtheearth,thesamewheelsalsodidnotturnfrombesidethem.Whenthecherubimstoodstill,thewheelsstoodstill,andwhenonewasliftedup,theotherlifteditselfup,forthespiritofthelivingcreaturewasinthem.ThenthegloryoftheLORDdepartedfromthethresholdofthetempleandstoodoverthecherubim.
Andthecherubimliftedtheirwingsandmountedupfromtheearthinmysight.Whentheywentout,thewheelswerebesidethem;andtheystoodatthedooroftheeastgateoftheLORD’shouse,andthegloryoftheGodofIsraelwasabovethem(Ezek.10:15–19).
Ezekiel’svisionwasnotofthedestructionofJerusaleminAD70,butofthefallofJerusalemtotheBabyloniansin586BC.Itissignificantthatthisearlierdestructionoftheholycitywasmarkedbythiskindofvision-sign.Josephus’saccountofsoldiersrunningaroundinthecloudsalsoresemblesthe
sightwitnessedbyElisha’sservantwhenhiseyeswereopenedtobeholdtheangelsthatfoughtforElishainDothan(2Kings6:17).Theseangelswereaheavenlyarmybornebychariotsoffire.
JosephusobviouslyregardedthevoicethatthepriestsheardasthevoiceofGod.Heannouncedanimminentdeparture(“Letusremovehence”),declaringagrimandfatal“Ichabod”totheholycity.(ThiseventwasalsoreportedbyTacitus.)JosephusalsomentionsdirepredictionsmadeinJerusalemfouryearsearlier
byamanwhowasnamed,ironically,Jesus.Themanrepeatedlycriedout,“Avoicefromtheeast,avoicefromthewest,avoicefromthefourwinds,avoiceagainstJerusalemandtheholyhouse,avoiceagainstthebridegroomsandthebrides,andavoiceagainstthiswholepeople.”Thismanwastakenintocustodyandbeatenwithseverestripes.Witheverystrokeofthewhiphecriedout,“Woe,woetoJerusalem!”18Josephusconcludedhisnarrativeofthedestructionofthetempleand
Jerusalemwiththissummary:“Nowthenumberofthosethatwerecarriedcaptiveduringthiswholewarwascollectedtobeninety-seventhousand;aswasthenumberofthosethatperishedduringthewholesiegeelevenhundredthousand,thegreaterpartofwhomwereindeedofthesamenation[withthecitizensofJerusalem],butnotbelongingtothecityitself;fortheywerecomeupfromallthecountrytothefeastofunleavenedbread,andwereonasuddenshutupbyanarmy,which,attheveryfirst,occasionedsogreatastraitnessamongthemthattherecameapestilentialdestructionuponthem,andsoonafterwardsuchafamine,asdestroyedthemmoresuddenly.”19Josephus’srecordofJerusalem’sfallindicatestheradicalfulfillmentof
Jesus’sprophecyintheOlivetDiscourse.Aswehaveseen,preteristsseeinthiseventnotonlythedestructionofthetempleanditsattendingcircumstances,butalsotheparousiaofChristinhisjudgment-coming.RadicalpreteristsseeinthiseventthefulfillmentofallNewTestamentexpectationsforthereturnofChristandforthelastthingsofeschatology.Butherewefindsharpdisagreementamongpreterists.Moderatepreterists,suchasthosewhoholdtoapostmillennialviewofeschatology,insistthatthoughthebulkoftheOlivetDiscoursewasfulfilledinAD70,therestillremainsafuturecomingorparousiaofChrist.Theseviewswillbeconsideredinthefollowingchapters.
6WHATDIDJOHNTEACHIN
REVELATION?
TheRevelationofJesusChrist,whichGodgaveHimtoshowHisservants—thingswhichmustshortlytakeplace....Thetimeisnear.
Revelation1:1–3
SurelynobookoftheBiblehasbeenstudiedmorecloselywithregardtotheendtimesthanthebookofRevelation,whichissometimesreferredtoastheNewTestamentApocalypse.Becauseofitsarcaneliteraryform,thebookhasbeensubjectedtoamultitudeofimaginativeandevenbizarreinterpretations.Somefindthegenresopuzzlingthattheydespairofeverachievingasoundandconsistentinterpretationofit.EvenJohnCalvinfailedtoincludeitamonghisprodigiousliteraryoutputofbiblicalcommentaries.ManyquestionstormenttheinterpreterofRevelation.Somesuggestthatit
waswritteninthestyleofadrama.Otherscontenditwaswritteninsomeformofsecretcodetopreventhostileauthoritiesfromunderstandingitsmeaning.Manywritershaveofferedvarious“keys”tobreakthecodeandmakeitscontentcleartoustoday.Moretothepoint,however,isthecrucialquestionofthebook’saudience.
WastheRevelationwrittenchieflyforthebenefitofpeoplelivinginthefinaldaysbeforetheconsummationofthekingdomofChrist?Wasitwrittenchieflyforthefirst-centurychurch?Wasitwrittenforthechurchofallages?Thesequestionsarenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusiveintheirscope.Anothercrucialissueisthequestionofthebook’smeaning.Wasitdescribing
eventsthatliestillinthefuture?Wasitdescribingeventsthatwereunfoldingin
thefirstcentury?Stillanotherquestionthathasbeenraisedafreshinourdayiswhenthe
Revelationwaswritten.Ifthebookwaswritteninthefinaldecadeofthefirstcentury(thetraditionalview),thenitspropheciesprobablydonotconcernthedestructionofJerusalem,aneventthatwouldhavealreadytakenplace.Ontheotherhand,ifRevelationwaswrittenbeforeAD70,thenacasecouldbemadethatitdescribeschieflythoseeventsleadinguptoJerusalem’sfall.ThewhenandwhyquestionsoftheApocalypseareinseparablyboundtogether.WhenprobingthemeaningofthebookofRevelation,weareimmediately
facedwithasetofproblemsnotunlikethoseraisedbytheOlivetDiscourseintheSynopticGospels.Thechiefquestionisonceagainthatofthetime-framereferences.
TheNearnessoftheEventsUnderstandingthetime-framereferencesofRevelationiskeytoallpreteristinterpretationsofthebook.J.StuartRussellarguesthatthetruekeytoRevelationisfoundinitsreferencetothethencontemporaryissuesitaddresses.“Mustitnotofnecessityrefertomattersofcontemporaryhistory?”Russellsays.“Theonlytenable,theonlyreasonable,hypothesisisthatitwasintendedtobeunderstoodbyitsoriginalreaders;butthisisasmuchastosaythatitmustbeoccupiedwiththeeventsandtransactionsoftheirownday,andthesecomprisedwithacomparativelybriefspaceoftime.”1
Russell’sstatementsoundssomewhatstrange.Surelyhewasawareofthemanybiblicalpropheciesoffutureeventsthatwerenotfullyunderstoodbythoselivingwhenthepropheciesweregiven.Oronecouldarguethatafutureprophecycouldbeunderstoodbythosetowhomitwasoriginallygivenandthattheyunderstoodthatitwasindeedaprophecyaboutthefuture.Suchprophecywouldnotbeuselessorirrelevanttothecontemporarygeneration,aseverygenerationofbelieversisencouragedbyGod’spromisesregardingthefuture.Russellsurelyunderstoodthisprincipleandisnotarguingsimplythat,
becausetheApocalypsewaswritteninthefirstcentury,itscontentmustthereforeberestrictedtoeventsinthattimeperiod.Russellindeedseemstoargueinthismanner.“Yetifthebookweremeanttounveilthesecretsofdistant
times,”hesays,“mustitnotofnecessityhavebeenunintelligibletoitsfirstreaders—andnotonlyunintelligible,butevenirrelevantanduseless.”2IthinkRussellbecamecarriedawaywithhisrhetoricatthispointandoverstatedhiscase.IdoubtifhewouldhavemadeasimilarjudgmentaboutfuturepropheciesofIsaiahandJeremiah.WhatwasreallydrivingRussellatthispointwasapparentlythetime-frame
referencesinthebookofRevelation.FromthesetextsRussellattemptstobuildhiscase,notfromaprinciplethatfutureprophecymustberelevanttothegenerationfirstreceivingit.Russellsaysthisabouttheinternalevidenceoftime-frame:IftherebeonethingwhichmorethananyotherisexplicitlyandrepeatedlyaffirmedintheApocalypseitisthenearnessoftheeventswhichitpredicts.Thisisstated,andreiteratedagainandagain,inthebeginning,themiddle,andtheend.Wearewarnedthat“thetimeisathand”;“Thesethingsmustshortlycometopass,”“Behold,Icomequickly”;“SurelyIcomequickly.”Yet,inthefaceoftheseexpressandoft-repeateddeclarations,mostinterpretershavefeltatlibertytoignorethelimitationsoftimealtogether,andtoroamatwilloveragesandcenturies,regardingthebookasasyllabusofchurchhistory,analmanacofpolitico—ecclesiasticaleventsforallChristendomtotheendoftime.Thishasbeenafatalandinexcusableblunder.3
Thefirsttime-framereferenceoccursinthebook’sopeningverses:“TheRevelationofJesusChrist,whichGodgavehimtoshowhisservants—thingswhichmustshortlytakeplace.AndhesentandsignifieditbyhisangeltohisservantJohn,whoborewitnesstothewordofGod,andtothetestimonyofJesusChrist,andtoallthingsthathesaw.Blessedishewhoreadsandthosewhohearthewordsofthisprophecy,andkeepthosethingswhicharewritteninit;forthetimeisnear”(Rev.1:1–3).Verse1mentionsthings“whichmustshortlytakeplace.”Verse3speaksof
thetimebeingnear.Thesereferences(andothersthroughoutthebook)arehandledinvariouswaysbyscholars.
TheInterpretationsofScholarsGeorgeEldonLaddwrites:Thewords“whatmustsoontakeplace”containanechoofDaniel2:28.AlthoughJohnseldomquotedtheOldTestamentinaformalway,hisbookisfilledwithobviousallusionstothepropheticwritings.Hereisafactwhosesignificancemanymoderncriticsoverlook....
Theseeventsare“soon”to“takeplace.”...Thesewordshavetroubledthecommentators.ThesimplestsolutionistotakethepreteristviewandtosaythatJohn,liketheentireearlyChristiancommunity,thoughtthatthecomingoftheLordwasnear,wheninfacttheywerewrong.OurLordhimselfseemstosharethiserrorinperspectiveinthesaying:“Thisgenerationwillnotpassawaybeforeallthesethingstakeplace”(Mark13:30).Othershaveinterpretedthephrasetomean“theseeventsmustsoonbegin”;others“theymustcertainlybegin”;stillothers,“theymustswiftlytakeplace”;thatis,oncetheeventsbegin,theendwillcomequickly.However,thesimplemeaningcannotbeavoided.Theproblemisraisedbythefactthattheprophets
werelittleinterestedinchronology,andthefuturewasalwaysviewedasimminent....Thereisinbiblicalprophecyatensionbetweentheimmediateandthedistantfuture;thedistantisviewedthroughthetransparencyoftheimmediate.ItistruethattheearlychurchlivedinexpectancyofthereturnoftheLord,anditisthenatureofbiblicalprophecytomakeitpossibleforeverygenerationtoliveinexpectancyoftheend.4
Tobecandid,Ifindthistreatmentofthequestionsomewhatdisturbing.Laddgrantsthat“thesimplestsolution”isthepreteristview,buthebelievesthisviewdrivesustotheconclusionthattheentireearlyChristiancommunity,includingtheApostleJohnandourLordhimself,waswrong.Ofcoursethisisnotthepreteristview.Thepreteristargues,notonlythattheearlychurchbelievedtheLord’scomingwasnear(atleastwithrespecttohiscominginjudgmenttoIsrael),butalsothatthisbeliefprovedtobetrue.Laddgrantsthatthisexpectationwasvirtuallyuniversalintheearlychurch,
buthebelievestheearlychurch,includingJesus,was“rescued”fromafalseexpectationbythenatureofbiblicalprophecy.Herethequestionisbeggedwithavengeance.DidnotJesusandtheapostlesunderstandthenatureofbiblicalprophecy?Ifbiblicalprophecyisalwaysviewedasimminent,doesitnotfollowthatifthepropheciesdonotoccurimminentlythenthepropheciesthemselvesarefalse?IfearIamhearingsomethingthatLadddidnotmeantoconvey.Perhapsthe
errorisinmyunderstandingratherthaninhisarticulationofhispoint.Ifthecontrollingprincipleisthatprophecyisalwaysimminent,thentime-framereferenceswouldindeedbemeaningless.Ladd’sviewisechoedtoadegreebyG.R.Beasley-Murray:“Thetimeis
near,”i.e.,thetimeofthefulfillmentofthevisiondisclosedintherevelation.Suchistheconvictionofalllivingprophecy,as[Wilhelm]Boussetobserved,andnotleastofallNewTestamentprophecy(e.g.,Rom.13:11f.,1Cor.7:29f.,Heb.10:37,1Pet.4:7).Anumberoffactorsflowtogetherinthisforeshortening—onemightcallittelescopic—viewofhistory....Accordingly“measuringhumanaffairswithdivinemeasures”(Arethas,citedby[Ernst]Lohmeyer),hesetshisdayinthecontextofthelastday,andsointerpretstheissuesofhisdayinthelightofthelastday.InrealitythehumanmeasuresoftimedemandthatthetemporalrelationshipofJohn’sdaytothelastdaybecorrected.Nevertheless
John’sreadersinalltimesareundertheobligationoflettingthelightofthelastdayfallontheirs,andofrelatingtheissuesoftheirdaytothekingdomofGod.ItisincarryingoutthatdifficultexercisethatJohn’svisionceasestobeofarchaeologicalinterestandbecomes[the]wordofGodtocontemporaryman.5
AgainIamsomewhatpuzzledbythistreatmentofthequestion.Beasley-Murrayassertsthatthe“human”measuresinthetextmustbe“corrected.”Thenhecallsustoa“difficultexercise”bywhichJohn’svisionbecomesthewordofGodtous.WemustaskwhatitwasbeforeitbecomesthewordofGod.IgrantthattheexerciseBeasley-Murraycallsforisindeeddifficult,perhapseventortuous.Onemoreexampleofthisapproachtothetime-framereferencesisthatof
RobertH.Mounce.
Johnwritesthattheseeventswhichconstitutetherevelationmusttakeplaceshortly.Thatmorethan1900yearsofchurchhistoryhavepassedandtheendisnotyetposesaproblemforsome.Onesolutionistounderstand“shortly”inthesenseofsuddenly,orwithoutdelayoncetheappointedtimearrives.Anotherapproachistointerpretitintermsofthecertaintyofeventsinquestion.OflittlehelpisthesuggestionthatJohnmaybeemployingtheformulaof2Peter3:8(“withtheLordonedayisasathousandyears”).[G.B.]Cairdbelievesthatthecomingcrisiswasnottheconsummationofhistorybutthepersecutionofthechurch.Indeed,thatdidtakeplaceshortly.Themostsatisfyingsolutionistotakethewordinastraightforwardsense,rememberingthatinthepropheticoutlooktheendisalwaysimminent.TheperspectiveiscommontotheentireNewTestament.JesustaughtthatGodwouldvindicatehiselectwithoutdelay(Luke18:8),andPaulwrotetotheRomansthatGodwouldsooncrushSatanundertheirfeet(Rom.16:20).6
Mouncerejectsalternatemeaningsofshortlyandoptsinsteadfortheword’s“straightforwardsense.”Butthenheinterpretsshortlyinlightofthepropheticoutlookorperspectivethathesaysis“commontotheentireNewTestament.”Theword’s“straightforward”meaningisnolongersostraightforward.Itmeanssomethingotherthanitsstraightforwardmeaning.MouncejustifiesthiswithappealstoJesusandPaul,whousesimilarlanguageforeventsthatobviously(accordingtoMounce)didnottakeplace“withoutdelay”or“soon.”Thistypeofliterarygymnasticshasearnedforevangelicalsthescornof
critics,whoprefertobeevenmorestraightforwardanddeclarethattheteachingofJesusandPaulintheseinstancesissimplywrong.ThesetextsarethenaddedtothemultitudeofimminenttextsintheNewTestamenttodisputetheinspirationandauthorityoftheBible.PreteristsagreethatJesususedimminentlanguageintheparableoftheunjustjudgeandthatPauldidaswellinRomans16:20.ButpreteristshastentoaddthatJesusandPaularereferringtoeventsthatdidtakeplaceinthefirstcentury,bywhichthesufferingChristianswerevindicatedandacrushingblowwasdeliveredtoSatan.
PreteristinterpretationofRevelationfollowscloselypreteristinterpretationoftheOlivetDiscourse.ThoughpreteristsdifferonhowmuchoftheRevelationandofthediscoursereferstothedestructionofJerusalem,theyallregardthemainsubstanceofbothtorefertothesameevent:Jesus’scominginjudgmentontheJewishnation.Russell,likeotherpreterists,seestheexplicittime-framereferencesofthe
Apocalypseasthekeytointerpretingthebook.“Itmaytrulybesaidthatthekeyhasallthewhilehungbythedoor,plainlyvisibletoeveryonewhohadeyestosee,”hewrites.“Yetmenhavetriedtopickthelock,orforcethedoor,orclimbupsomeotherway,ratherthanavailthemselvesofsosimpleandreadyawayofadmissionastousethekeymadeandprovidedforthem.”7
GroupsofTime-FrameReferencesKennethL.GentryJr.,apostmillenarianpreterist,referstothetime-framereferencesintheApocalypsebylistingthemaccordingtothreebasiccategories.“Thetemporalexpectationreceivesfrequentrepetitioninthatitoccursnotonlyseventimesintheopeningandclosingchapters,butatleastthreetimesinthelettersinchapterstwoandthree”(Rev.2:16;3:11),Gentrywrites.“Thisexpectationisalsovariedinitsmannerofexpression,almostasiftoavoidanypotentialconfusionastothespecificityofitsmeaning.Itsvariationrevolvesamongthreewordgroups.”8
ThefirstwordgroupGentrytreatsisthatoftachos.Thistermisusuallytranslatedeither“shortly”or“quickly.”ItappearsinRevelation1:1;2:16;3:11;22:6,7,12,20.Gentrywrites:Thetranslationunderquestion(i.e.,inRev.1:1,althoughtheotherreferencescitedshouldbekeptinmind,aswell)hastodowiththeproperinterpretationoftheGreekphraseentachei.Tacheiisthedativesingularofthenountachos.Lexicographersseemtobeuniversallyagreedwiththetranslatorsastothemeaningoftheword.Accordingtothe[Bauer,]ArndtandGingrichLexicon,tachosisusedintheSeptuagint(andcertainnon-canonicalwritings)tomean“speed,quickness,swiftness,haste.”Intheprepositionalphraseentachei,thewordisusedadverbiallyintheSeptuagintandJosephustomean“quickly,atonce,withoutdelay.”TheNewTestamentusestachosinthismanner,says[Bauer,]ArndtandGingrich,inActs10:33;12:7;
17:15;22:18.InLuke18:8;Romans16:20;1Timothy3:14;Revelation1:1;and22:6,thislexicontranslatesit“soon,inashorttime.”9
GentrycitessimilarentriesfromJosephHenryThayer,G.Abbott-Smith,F.J.A.Hort,andKurtAland.10Gentryarguesthatcommentatorswouldrenderthetermdifferentlyfromthelexicographicalconsensusonlyifinfluencedbyaninterpretivecontrollingapriori.Thesecondwordgroupistheengysgroup.Thisterm,translated“near”or“at
hand,”isusedinRevelation1:3and22:10.Itisatime-framereferenceindicatingeventsthatareimminent.Gentryargues:HowcouldeventsrelatedtothecollapseoftheRomanEmpiretwoorthreehundredyearsinthefuturebeconsidered“athand,”asper[HenryBarclay]Swete,[Albert]Barnes,andothers?SeveralgenerationsoftheseChristianswouldhavewaxedandwanedoversuchaperiod.Evenmoredifficulttounderstandishoweventstwoorthreethousandyearsinthefuturecouldbeconsidered“athand,”asper[RobertH.]Mounce,[John]Walvoord,andothers.Howcouldsucheventssoremotelystretchedoutintothefuturebe“athand”?Butiftheexpectedeventsweretooccurwithinaperiodoffromonetofiveyears—asinthecasewithRevelationifthebookwerewrittenpriortoAD70—thenallbecomesclear.11
Thethirdwordgroupismellō,whichisfoundinRevelation1:19and3:10.“Certainlyitistruethattheverbmellōcanindicatesimply‘destined,’oritcanbeemployedinaweakenedsenseasaperiphrasisforthefuturetense,”Gentrysays.“Nevertheless,whenusedwiththeaoristinfinitive—asinRevelation1:19—theword’spreponderateusageandpreferredmeaningis:‘beonthepointof,beaboutto.’Thesameistruewhenthewordisusedwiththepresentinfinitive,asinRevelation3:10.ThebasicmeaninginbothThayerandAbbott-Smithis:‘tobeaboutto.’”12
Table6.1Time-FrameReferencesinRevelation
Shortly,quickly
1:1 ...thingswhichmustshortlytakeplace.
2:16 Repent,orelseIwillcometoyouquickly.
3:11 Behold,Icomequickly!
22:6 ...thingswhichmustshortlytakeplace.
22:7 Behold,Iamcomingquickly!
22:12 Behold,Iamcomingquickly.
22:20 SurelyIamcomingquickly.
Near,athand
1:3 Thetimeisnear.
22:10 Thetimeisathand.
Aboutto,onthepointof
1:19 Write...thethingsthatareabouttotakeplace.
3:10 ...thehouroftrial...isabouttocomeuponthewholeworld.
ThistriadofwordgroupspointstothenearnessofthethingsforetoldinthebookofRevelation.Thesetime-framereferencesfollowcloselythoseoftheOlivetDiscourse.Themajorobjectiontothisposition,however,regardsthedatingofRevelation.IfthebookwaswrittenafterAD70,thenitscontentsmanifestlydonotrefertoeventssurroundingthefallofJerusalem—unlessthebookisawholesalefraud,havingbeencomposedafterthepredictedeventshadalreadyoccurred.TheburdenforpreteriststhenistodemonstratethatRevelationwaswritten
beforeAD70.ThisburdenbecamethethesisofGentry’sdoctoraldissertation.HisbookBeforeJerusalemFellhasbeenwelcomedbothbyadvocatesofpreterismandbyitsopponents.JayE.AdamssaysofBeforeJerusalemFell:“Hereisabooksomeofushavebeenawaitingforyears!Nowthatitisherewecanrejoice.Mr.GentryconvincinglydemonstratesthefactthebookofRevelationwaswritten,asitinsomanywaysdeclares,priortothedestructionofJerusaleminAD70.Itshouldreceiveawidereadingandoughttorattlemanywindows.”13GeorgeW.Knight,whoisnotapreterist,saysthis:“BeforeJerusalemFellis
athoroughandoutstandingstatementofthecasefortheearlydateofRevelation.Thebookmakesoneawareoftheevidencefromwithinthebookandfromearlychurchsources,andsurveystheargumentsofNewTestamentscholarsofthiscenturyandpreviouscenturiesconcerningthequestion.Nostoneisleftunturnedtoresolvethequestion.”14Whenquestionsofdatingbiblicalbooksarise,onemustconsidertwomain
kindsofevidence:externalandinternal.Asthewordsuggests,externalevidencelookstomaterialapartfromandoutsidethebookitself,suchasthetestimonyofancientwritersorcitations,quotes,orallusionsfromotherwriters,andsoforth.ThesignificanceoftheexternalevidencefordatingRevelationhasoftenbeenhotlycontested.Scholarlyopinionhasvacillatedthroughtheyears.
Gentryreports:Around1800,datesfortheNewTestamentcanonrangedveryconservativelybetweenAD50andAD100.By1850,duetotheTübingenschoolofthoughtandunderthespecialinfluenceofF.C.Baur,therangeofdateshadwidenedfromAD50+toAD160+.RegardingRevelation’sdateundertheswayofTübingen,“itwasastrikingparadoxthattheTübingenSchoolwhichleftPaulwithonlyfouror,asputby[Adolf]Hilgenfeldinamoremoderateform,withonlysevenauthenticEpistles,andbroughtmostoftheNewTestamentdocumentsdowntoalatedate,shouldinthecaseoftheApocalypsehaveaffirmedapostolicauthorshipandadate[a]quarterofacenturyearlierthanthatassignedbytradition.”15
Thoughconcedingthatintwentieth-centuryscholarlycirclesthemajorityhaveplacedthewritingofRevelationwellafterAD70,Gentrylistsnumerousscholarswhoplaceitearlier.ThislistincludesGregL.Bahnsen,AdamClarke,F.W.Farrar,JohnA.T.Robinson,HenryBarclaySwete,MiltonS.Terry,WilhelmBousset,F.F.Bruce,RudolfBultmann,SamuelDavidson,AlfredEdersheim,JohannEichhorn,JosephA.Fitzmyer,J.B.Lightfoot,C.F.D.Moule,andAugustusH.Strong,tonamebutafew.16Twothingscanbesaidofthislist.First,itrepresentsscholarsfromevery
pointonthetheologicalspectrum.Andsecond,thelist,initself,doesnotproveanearly-datetheory,asthetheorycannotbedemonstratedbycountingnoses.Thelistdoesreveal,however,thatthenotionofanearlydateforRevelationisbynomeansanovelty.
IrenaeusandClementThechiefargumentforalatedateforRevelationrestsonexternalevidence,specificallythetestimonyofthechurchfatherIrenaeus(AD130–202).IrenaeusreferredtoRevelationinaworkhewroteneartheendofthesecondcentury,probablybetweenAD180and190.Irenaeus’scredibilityisenhanced,notonlybyhisimportantdefenseofthefaith,butalsobyhisclaimtobeapersonalacquaintanceofPolycarp,whointurnhadknowntheApostleJohnhimself.Irenaeus’stestimonyregardingRevelationisfoundinbook5ofhisfamousworkAgainstHeresies.ThisworkhasnotbeenpreservedinGreek,survivingonlyinLatintranslation.EusebiuscitedIrenaeus’s
commentsonRevelation,however,andGentryprovidesadetailedanalysisofthisGreektext.ThishasbeenrenderedinEnglishasfollows:“Wewillnot,however,incurtheriskofpronouncingpositivelyastothenameofAntichrist;forifitwerenecessarythathisnameshouldbedistinctlyrevealedinthispresenttime,itwouldhavebeenannouncedbyhimwhobeheldtheapocalypticvision.Forthatwasseennoverylongtimesince,butalmostinourday,towardstheendofDomitian’sreign.”17
Table6.2SourcesofInformationConcerningJohnandRevelation
Name Birth Death Placeofresidence
ApolloniusofTyana 1stcentury Greece
Clement c.101 Rome
Polycarp c.69 155 Smyrna
Papias 2dcentury Phrygia
Irenaeus c.130 c.202 Gaul
Clement c.150 c.215 Alexandria
Tertullian c.160 c.230 Carthage
Eusebius c.260 c.339 Caesaria
Epiphanius c.315 403 Palestine,Cyprus
Jerome c.347 c.420 Bethlehem
Arethas c.860 Caesaria
Theophylact c.1050 c.1109 Ochrida
Istheantecedentofthat(inthefinalsentence)thevision,orisitJohn,theonewhosawthevision?IsIrenaeussayingthatJohn’svisiontookplaceduringthereignofDomitian(whichwoulddatethebookofRevelationafterthedestructionofJerusalem)?OrisIrenaeussayingsimplythatJohn,wholivedintothereignofDomitian,wasseenatthatlatetime?Gentryoptsforthelatteralternative.HecitestheargumentofF.H.Chase:
Thelogicofthesentencesseemstometorequirethisinterpretation.ThestatementthatthevisionwasseenatthecloseofDomitian’sreignsuppliesno
reasonwhythemysteriousnumbershouldhavebeenexpounded“byhimwhosawtheapocalypse,”hadhejudgedsuchanexpositionneedful.If,ontheotherhand,wereferheōrathētoSt.John,themeaningisplainandsimple.Wemayexpandthesentencesthus:“Haditbeenneedfulthattheexplanationofthenameshouldbeproclaimedtothemenofourownday,thatexplanationwouldhavebeengivenbytheauthorofthebook.Fortheauthorwasseenonearth,helivedandheldconversewithhisdisciples,notsoverylongago,butalmostinourowngeneration.Thus,ontheonehand,helivedyearsafterhewrotethebook,andtherewasabundantopportunityforhimtoexpoundtheriddle,hadhewishedtodoso;and,ontheotherhand,sincehelivedonalmostintoourgeneration,theexplanation,hadhegivenit,musthavebeenpreservedtous.”18
ThoughsupportedbyotherinterpretersofIrenaeus,suchasJacobusWettsteinandJamesM.Macdonald,19Chase’sviewisspeculative.HedoesnotdemonstrateconclusivelythatthisiswhatIrenaeushadtomean.ChasemerelyindicateswhatIrenaeuscouldhavemeant,oratbestwhatIrenaeusprobablymeant.Chasedoesmakeclear,however,thatthewordsofIrenaeuscontainacertainambiguity.ThisprecludesthemfrombeingusedasdefinitiveprooffordatingtheApocalypseduringthereignofDomitian.Irenaeusalsoreferstothe“ancientcopies”ofRevelation.Thisdesignationis
difficulttosquarewiththeideaoftheoriginalautographshavingbeencomposed(accordingtoIrenaeus)“almostinourowngeneration.”OtherimportantexternalevidenceincludesthetestimonyofClementof
Alexandria(AD150–215).“Whenafterthedeathofthetyrant,”saysClement,“[Johntheapostle]removedfromtheislandofPatmostoEphesus,heusedtojourneybyrequesttotheneighbouringdistrictsoftheGentiles,insomeplacestoappointbishops,inotherstoregulatewholechurches,inotherstosetamongtheclergysomeoneman,itmaybe,ofthoseindicatedbytheSpirit.”20Whois“thetyrant”?Clementdoesnotnamehim.Gentryamassesevidenceto
supportthethesisthatthetyrantisnotDomitianbutNero.NerowasregardedasthequintessentialtyrantandwascommonlyknownbythenameTyrant.GentrycitesthetestimonyofApolloniusofTyana.“Inmytravels,whichhavebeenwiderthanevermanyetaccomplished,Ihaveseenmany,manywildbeastsofArabiaandIndia,”writesApollonius.“Butthisbeast,thatiscommonlycalledaTyrant,Iknownothowmanyheadsithas,norifitbecrookedofclaw,andarmedwithhorriblefangs....Andofwildbeastsyoucannotsaythattheywereeverknowntoeattheirownmothers,butNerohasgorgedhimselfonthisdiet.”21
TwootherstatementsbyClementalsolendsupportfortheearlydatingofRevelation.ThefirstisareferencetoJohnpursuingayoungapostateonhorsebackduringtheperiodafterJohn’sexile.IfhewasexiledduringthereignofDomitian,thenJohnwouldhavebeeninhisninetieswhenchasingtheapostate.Whilenotimpossible,suchafeatisnotlikely.ThesecondstatementcomesfromClement’sMiscellanies:“Fortheteaching
ofourLordathisadvent,beginningwithAugustusandTiberius,wascompletedinthemiddleofthetimesofTiberius.Andthatoftheapostles,embracingtheministryofPaul,endswithNero.”22SinceClementconsideredtheApostleJohntheauthorofRevelationand
ClementarguesthatapostolicrevelationceasedwithNero,ClementthereforebelievesthatRevelationwaswrittenbeforeNerodied.Aftercanvassingotherexternalsourcesfromantiquity,Gentryprovidesthe
followingsummary:“Therearesomewitnessesthatmayhintatapre–AD70datingforRevelation,suchasTheShepherdofHermasandPapias.Yet,othersourcesareevenmoresuggestiveofaNeronicbanishment:theMuratorianCanon,Tertullian,andEpiphanius.OthersseemtoimplybothdatesforJohn’sbanishment:Eusebius(cf.EcclesiasticalHistorywithEvangelicalDemonstrations)andJerome....Ontheotherhand,undeniablysupportiveofaNeronicdateareArethas,theSyriacHistoryofJohn,theSyriacversionsofRevelation,andTheophylact.”23Gentryrecognizesthattheexternalevidenceregardingthedatingof
Revelationisneithermonolithicnorhomogeneous,buthearguesthatthepreponderanceofthisevidencesupportsaNeronicdate.TheinternalevidenceforanearlydateofRevelationinvolvesthecontentof
theApocalypseitself,aswellasthelifesituationreflectedinitspages.J.StuartRussellseesRevelationastheApostleJohn’sextendedversionoftheOlivetDiscourse.GentrydeclaresthatthecentralthemeofRevelationisthecomingdestructionofJerusalemandtheendoftheJewishdispensation.Inadditiontothetime-framereferencesalreadyconsidered,hemakeshiscasebyanalyzingseveralmotifs.
TheIdentityoftheSixthKingReferencetothesixthkingisfoundinchap.17:Buttheangelsaidtome,“Whydidyoumarvel?Iwilltellyouthemysteryofthewomanandofthebeastthatcarriesher,whichhasthesevenheadsandthetenhorns.Thebeastthatyousawwas,andisnot,andwillascend
outofthebottomlesspitandgotoperdition.Andthosewhodwellontheearthwillmarvel,whosenamesarenotwrittenintheBookofLifefromthefoundationoftheworld,whentheyseethebeastthatwas,andisnot,andyetis.Hereisthemindwhichhaswisdom:Thesevenheadsaresevenmountainsonwhichthewomansits.Therearealsosevenkings.Fivehavefallen,oneis,andtheotherhasnotyetcome.Andwhenhecomes,hemustcontinueashorttime.Andthebeastthatwas,andisnot,ishimselfalsotheeighth,andisoftheseven,andisgoingtoperdition.Andthetenhornswhichyousawaretenkingswhohavereceivednokingdomasyet,buttheyreceiveauthorityforonehouraskingswiththebeast”(Rev.17:7–17).
Whoisthesixthking?Inthequesttoidentifyhim,oneencounterstwoproblems:(1)DoesthetermkingrefertoaRomanemperor?(2)Whatistheproperwaytocounttheseemperors?GentryandotherslinkthereferencetosevenhillswithRome,whichwasknownasthe“CityofSevenHills.”Ifthislinkageiscorrect,thenitwouldseemthatthekingisaRomanruler.Revelationspecificallymentionssevenkings.Fivearesaidtohavefallen.
Oneisreferredtointhepresenttense.Theseventhhasnotyetcome,andwhenhedoeshewillnotremainforlong.CharlesCutlerTorreysaysofthisreferencethat“thiscertainlyseemstoprovide,asexactlyascouldbeexpectedofanapocalypse,informationastothetime—theprecisereign—inwhichthebookwascomposed.”24ThoughJuliusCaesarpreferredthetitleCaesartoking,itwascommoninthe
ancientworldtorefertoRome’semperors,includingJulius,askings.EventheNewTestamentbearswitnesstothiswhenthechiefpriestsdeclaretoPontiusPilate,“WehavenokingbutCaesar”(John19:15).WearestillleftwiththequestionofthepropermethodofcountingtheRoman
rulers.Augustuswasthefirsttorefertohimselfasemperor.SincehefollowedJuliusCaesar,dowebegincountingwithJuliusorAugustus?Basicallytwodifferentapproacheshavebeenmadetothequestion.OneapproachistostartwithAugustus,asintable6.3,option1.InthislistthesixthkingisGalba,whosereignwasbrief.Thosewhousethisapproach,however,frequentlyskipoverGalba,Otho,andVitellius,sincetheywereinpoweronlybrieflyduringthestruggleforsupremacythatfollowedthedeathofNero.Iftheyareomittedfrom
thelist(seetable6.3,option2),thenthesixthkingisVespasian,duringwhosereignJerusalemwasdestroyed.IfthesixthkingisVespasian,thenwestillfallshortofthereignofDomitian,whichisthetime-frameusuallygivenforthelatedateofRevelation.Amorenaturalapproach,however,istobeginthelistofkingswithJulius
Caesar,aswasthecustomofancienthistorianssuchasJosephusandSuetonius,aswellasDioCassius.Inthisseries(seetable6.3,option3),thesixthkingisNero.IfheisthekingreferredtoinRevelationinthepresenttense,thenthisaddsconsiderableweighttotheargumentfordatingthebookinthemid-tolate-sixties.
Table6.3TheSixthKingofRevelation17:10
Option1 Option2 Option3 Reign
1.JuliusCaesar 49–44
1.Augustus 1.Augustus 2.Augustus 31–14
2.Tiberius 2.Tiberius 3.Tiberius 14–37
3.Caligula 3.Caligula 4.Caligula 37–41
4.Claudius 4.Claudius 5.Claudius 41–54
5.Nero 5.Nero 6.Nero 54–68
6.Galba 68–69
7.Otho 69–69
8.Vitellius 69–69
9.Vespasian 6.Vespasian 69–79
ThePresenceoftheTempleIfthebookofRevelationwaswrittenafterthedestructionofJerusalemandthetemple,itseemsstrangethatJohnwouldbesilentaboutthesecataclysmicevents.Grantedthisisanargumentfromsilence,butthesilenceisdeafening.NotonlydoesRevelationnotmentionthetemple’sdestructionasapastevent,itfrequentlyreferstothetempleasstillstanding.ThisisseenclearlyinRevelation11.“ThetimeoftheApocalypseisalsodefinitelyfixed,”writesBernhardWeiss(citedbyGentry),“bythefact
thataccordingtotheprophecyinchapter11itwasmanifestlywrittenbeforethedestructionofJerusalem,whichin11:1isonlyanticipated.”25
ArgumentsagainstWeiss’sthesisarebasedlargelyonthewritingsofClementofRome.TraditionhasitthatClementwroteduringthelastdecadeofthefirstcentury.DonaldGuthrieandRobertH.Mounce,forexample,arguethatClementspokeofthetempleasstillstandingandofsacrificesstillbeingmadeinJerusalem.26SomecontendthatClementwasspeakinginthe“idealpresent,”othersthathewasreferringtoongoingsacrificesbyaJewishremnantnearthetemplesite.ButifClementisactuallydeclaringthatthetemplestillstandsinJerusalem,thenwemustconcludeoneofthefollowing:(1)Hewaswrong;(2)JerusalemwasnotdestroyeduntilatleasttwentyyearsafterAD70;or(3)ClementwrotebeforeJerusalemwasdestroyed.
Theleastcredibleoptionisthesecond.TheAD70dateisoneofthebestattestedinallofancienthistory.Thefirstoptionisalsohighlyunlikely.SurelyClementwasawareofthetemple’sdestructionifhewroteinthenineties.Unlessweassumethathewasspeakinginsomeidealizedsense,themostlikelyoption
isthethird:thathewrotehisletterbeforeJerusalemfell.Gentrygivesimpressiveevidencetosupportthisconclusion.GentrycanvassesotherinternalevidenceforanearlydateofRevelation,such
asthequestionofemperorworship,theroleofJewishChristianity,theloomingJewishwar,andtheroleofNero(towhichwewilldevotemoreattentionlater).“Myconfidentconviction,”concludesGentry,“isthatasolidcaseforaNeronicdateforRevelationcanbesetforthfromtheavailableevidences,bothinternalandexternal.Infact,IwouldleantowardadateaftertheoutbreakoftheNeronicpersecutioninlateAD64andbeforethedeclarationoftheJewishWarinearlyAD67.AdateineitherAD65orearlyAD66wouldseemmostsuitable.Myhopeisthatthedebatewillberenewedwithvigorandcare,forthematterismorethanamerelyacademicorintellectualexercise;ithasramificationsintheareaofpracticalChristianity.”27
7WHENISTHERESURRECTION?
TheLordHimselfwilldescendfromheavenwithashout,withthevoiceofanarchangel,andwiththetrumpetofGod.
1Thessalonians4:16
Theresurgenceofpreterisminourdayhasappearedinvariousformsanddegrees.Itisanythingbutmonolithicinitsviewpoint,andithasengendereddebate,attimessharp,amongitsadvocates.Thedifferentschoolsofpreterismhavebeendescribedinvariousways.
KennethL.GentryJr.,forexample,distinguisheshispositionfromthatofJ.StuartRussell,MaxR.King,andothersbycallinghisownposition(aswellasthatofGaryDeMar,theearlyDavidChilton,andothers)orthodoxpreterism.Hereferstothepositionadvocatedbytheotherswithavarietyoftermsincludinghyper-preterism,consistentpreterism,andfullpreterism.Ihavesoughttodistinguishthetwocampsbyusingsuchtermsasradicalpreterismandmoderatepreterism.Asthedebatehasunfolded,thelabelsthemselveshavegeneratednosmall
degreeofdisagreement.EdwardE.StevenshasrespondedtoGentry’sessay“ABriefTheologicalAnalysisofHyper-Preterism”withabookletentitledsimplyStevens’ResponsetoGentry.1Thesetwoessaysputthedifferencesbetweenthetwoschoolsinboldrelief.StevenstakesumbrageatGentry’suseofthetermhyper-preterism.Hewincesatthepejorativeconnotationoftheprefixhyper-,whichoftensuggestsanextremistorunbalancedviewpoint.Thetermradicalsuffersfromthesamefate.WhenIusetheterm,Imean
“thatwhichholdssomethingasacorebelief.”ThetermradicalcomesfromtheLatinradix,whichmeans“root.”Buttermstendtotakeonnuances,andinour
culturethewordradicalconjuresupmorethanIwishtoimposeonanyschoolofpreterism.SoitisprobablybetterthatInowmodifymyowndescriptivelanguage.Beforeembarkingonhiscritique,Gentrymakesthisobservation:“...there
arenumerousexegeticalandtheologicalproblemsIhavewiththehyper-preteristviewpoint.Ideemmyhistoric,orthodoxpreterismtobeexegeticalpreterism(becauseIfindspecificpassagescallingforspecificpreteristevents);IdeemMaxKingandEdStevens’viewstobetheologicalpreterismorcomprehensivepreterism(theyapplyexegeticalconclusionsdrawnfromseveraleschatologicalpassagestoalleschatologicalpassagesbecauseoftheirtheologicalparadigm).”2Gentrydistinguishesbetween“exegeticalpreterism”and“theological
preterism.”Thisdistinctionisnotallthathelpful.Gentry’sviewisintenselytheological,andthatofStevensandothersisvitallyconcernedwithexegesis.Gentryischargingthatcomprehensivepreteristsaredriventotheir“consistent”viewpointbytheirtheologicalparadigm.StevensrespondstoGentry:
It’snotclearwhatGentryintendedtocommunicatewhenheusedtheterm“hyper”in“hyper-preterist.”Surelyheisnotusingitforridiculeorderisivepurposes,althoughothersontheInternethavesousedit.IfailtoseewhatpointGentryismaking,thatcouldnotbemadewithalesspejorativeterm.Whynotsimplystickwith“consistentpreterist”(asinhisopeningparagraph),or“comprehensivepreterist”(asinhisthirdparagraph)?Actuallytheterm“preterist”isallthatisneededtodescribeourview.“Preterist”meanspastinfulfillment.Onlythosewhotakeapastfulfillmentofalltheeschatologicalevents(e.g.,thereturnofChrist,resurrection,judgment)canrightlybecalled“preterist.”Thosewhobelievethemajoreschatologicalevents(i.e.,SecondComing,Resurrection,Judgment)arestillfuturearereallyjustanotherkindoffuturist.SoGentryandother“partialPreterists”shouldmoreproperlybelabeledamilorpostmillennialhistoricistsorfuturists.Onlysomeonewhoputsalloftheeschatologicaleventsinthepastcanrightlybecalled“preterist”inthetruesenseoftheterm....Theterm“preterist”belongstothe“fullpreterist,”nottothe“partialpreterist”futuristslikeGentry.3
Thisdebateoverlabelsmayseemlikeatempestinateapot.ItbringstomindthecontroversyJohnCalvinhadconcerningthetermsubstance.Calvinhadtowagewarontwofronts,debatingbothwiththosewhoarguedforthepresenceofthe“substance”ofChrist’sbodyinthesacramentandwiththespiritualistswhodeniedthepresenceofChristinthesacramentaltogether.Whenarguingwiththeformer,heavoidedthetermsubstancebecauseitconveyedtheideaofcorporalorphysicalsubstance.Whenarguingwiththelatter,heinsistedthatsubstancemeans,notthephysicalpresence,butthe“real”presenceofChristinthesacrament.Thisillustratesthatthepartiesinadisputeoftenuselanguageindifferent
ways.LikeCalvin,Gentryhasbeendebatingontwofronts.Ontheonesideheis
engagingDispensationalismwithitsfuturism.AgainstthemhearguesforalimitedpreterismwithreferencetospecificpropheciesthathebelieveswerefulfilledinAD70.Ontheothersideheisengagingfullpreterists.AgainstthemGentrystresseseventsthathebelieveshavenotyetbeenfulfilled.ThoughStevensprefersthatthetermpreteristbereservedforthosewho
believethatalleschatologicaleventshavebeenfulfilledinthepast,heneverthelessreferstoGentryasa“partialpreterist.”Maybethetermsthatbestdescribethetwopositionsarefullpreterismandpartialpreterism.Botharepreteristwithrespecttosomeeschatologicalevents,butbotharenotpreteristwithrespecttoalleschatologicalevents.Thetermsfullandpartialcanthenbesafelyappliedtothesetwopositions.
TwoKindsofPreterism
FullPreterism PartialPreterism
Consistentpreterism Moderatepreterism
Radicalpreterism Exegeticalpreterism
Theologicalpreterism Orthodoxpreterism
Hyper-preterism
PreterismandtheCreeds
Gentrycriticizesfullpreterismsharply,arguingthatitfallsoutsidethescopeoforthodoxChristianity.Atleastfromacreedalperspective,Gentrysaysitisheterodoxy(orheresy).“NocreedallowsanysecondAdventinAD70,”hewrites.“Nocreedallowsanyothertypeofresurrectionthanabodilyone.Historiccreedsspeakoftheuniversal,personaljudgmentofallmen,notofarepresentativejudgmentinAD70.ItwouldbemostremarkableiftheentirechurchthatcamethroughAD70missedtheproperunderstandingoftheeschatonanddidnotrealizeitsmembershadbeenresurrected!”4BeforeexploringStevens’sresponsetothechargeofheterodoxy,wemust
noteinpassingthatGentrysuccinctlysummarizesthetheologicalissuesinvolved:afutureparousia,afuturejudgment,andafutureresurrection.These
arecrucialeschatologicaleventsthatpartialpreteristssayhavenotyetbeenfulfilled.SurelyGentryiscorrectwhenassertingthatthehistoriccreedsofChristendomarevirtuallyunanimousinregardingtheseeventsasfuture.Stevensdefendsfullpreterismfromthechargeofheresy,notbyarguingthat
thecreedsinfactsupportthisposition,butbyarguingthatthecreedsarenotthefinaltestoforthodoxy.TheultimatetestisconformitytoScripture,nottothecreeds.HepointsoutthattheReformedtraditionisadamantaboutthis.TheReformationprincipleofsolaScripturawasforgedinthiscrucible.“FullPreteristsareReformers,”Stevenssays,“andassuchitshouldbeobviousthatwebelievetheearlychurchandthecreedscanbe(andhavebeenfoundtobe)mistaken.”5ObviouslythefullpreteristshavenodesiretodeviatefromScripture.They
beartheburdeninthiscontroversyofshowingthatcreedalorthodoxyhasbeenwrongatcrucialpointsofeschatologicalunderstanding.Thisisaweightyburden,anenormousonusofresponsibility.IdonotbelievethatGentryhasaslavishviewofthecreedsorthathethinksanyorallofthemhavetheauthorityofScripture.GentryisfullycommittedtotheReformationprincipleofsolaScriptura.ButstrongadvocatesofsolaScripturahistoricallyhavehadgreatrespectforthehistoriccreeds.Theseadvocateshavenotconsideredthecreedsinfallible,buttheyhaveheldthecreedsinextremelyhighesteem.
Table7.1DifferencesbetweenPreterists
FullPreterists PartialPreterists
AD70Attheendofhistory AD70
Attheendofhistory
Coming(parousia)ofChrist
yes no yes yes
Resurrectionandrapture
yes no no yes
DayoftheLord yes no yes yes
Judgment yes no yes yes
PersonallyIcringeattheideaofgoingagainstsuchaunifiedandstrongtestimonytothehistoricfaith,eventhoughIgrantthepossibilitythattheyarewrongatpoints.Allwhoareinclinedtodifferwiththecreedsshouldobservea
warninglightandshowgreatcaution.OfcoursethiswarninglightpalesincomparisontotheauthorityofScriptureitself.IwassomewhattakenabackwhilereadingStevensonthispointwhenhe
includedinhisargumentaquotefrommyownlips.“Ifwedon’ttakeafullpreteristapproach,”Stevenswrites,“weleavetheintegrityofJesusandtheNewTestamentwritersutterlydefenseless.Certainly,itimpugnstheinterpretativeaccuracyofthehistoricchurchinmattersofeschatology,butasR.C.Sproulobserved,‘...peoplehaveattackedthecredibilityofJesus.MaybesomeChurchFathersmadeamistake.Maybeourfavoritetheologianshavemademistakes.Icanabidewiththat.Ican’tabidewithJesus’sbeingafalseprophet.’[WeneedtostateitclearlyfortherecordthatR.C.Sproul,Sr.isnotafullpreterist,buthedoesseealotofmeritinthepartialpreteristapproachsimilartoKenGentry.]”6Itiscomfortingtobequotedaccurately.IdidsaywhatStevenssaysIsaid.I
agreewithallpreteriststhatwhatisatstakehereistheauthorityofJesus,andwemustbeconsumedwithmaintaininghisauthority.Tobecompletelycandid,ImustconfessthatIamstillunsettledonsomecrucialmatters.IamconvincedthatthesubstanceoftheOlivetDiscoursewasfulfilledinAD70andthatthebulkofRevelationwaslikewisefulfilledinthattime-frame.IshareGentry’sconcernsaboutfullpreterism,particularlyonsuchissuesastheconsummationofthekingdomandtheresurrectionofthedead.InthefinalanalysisIamconfidentthatbothStevensandGentryagreethatthesemattersmustbesettledonthebasisofbiblicalexegesis.Letusturnourattentionthentothebiblicalquestionsthatremainunresolvedbetweenpartialandfullpreterists.Thecentralissueisthis:WhateventsprophesiedintheBibleareasyet
unfulfilled?Fullpreteristsrefertothemselvesas“consistent”preterists,implyingthatpartialpreteristsare“inconsistent.”Fullpreteristsapplyastrictviewofthemeaningofparousia,endoftheage,andthedayoftheLord.WhilepartialpreteristsacknowledgethatinthedestructionofJerusalemin
AD70therewasaparousiaorcomingofChrist,theymaintainthatitwasnottheparousia.Thatis,thecomingofChristinAD70wasacominginjudgmentontheJewishnation,indicatingtheendoftheJewishageandthefulfillmentofadayoftheLord.Jesusreallydidcomeinjudgmentatthistime,fulfillinghisprophecyintheOlivetDiscourse.ButthiswasnotthefinalorultimatecomingofChrist.Theparousia,initsfullness,willextendfarbeyondtheJewishnationandwillbeuniversalinitsscopeandsignificance.Itwillcome,notattheendoftheJewishage,butattheendofhumanhistoryasweknowit.Itwillbe,notmerelyadayoftheLord,butthefinalandultimatedayoftheLord.Partialpreteristsunderstandthattherearenuancestobiblicalterminology
regardingthecomingofChristandthedayoftheLord,nuancesthatmakeit
possibleandnecessarytospeakofmorethanoneeventthatencompassesallthesethingsatonce.Fullpreterists,ontheotherhand,arguethatthisapproachisinconsistentand
arbitrary,resultinginmultiplecomingsofChristanddaysoftheLord.Theyinsistthattime-framereferencesintheOlivetDiscoursesupplythesupremekeytoNewTestamentprophecyandthatthiskeyappliestoallreferencestoeschatologicalevents.StevensobjectstoGentry’schargethat,accordingtoconsistentpreterists,“allprophecyisfulfilledintheAD70destructionoftheTemple,includingtheSecondAdvent,theresurrectionofthedead,thegreatJudgment,andsoforth.”7Stevenssaysthisisnot“exactlycorrect”becausefullpreteristsbelieveinan
ongoingfulfillmentofprophecyinthepresentkingdomofGod.Thisongoingfulfillment,however,doesnotincludespecificeventspredictedintheNewTestament.Thisseemstobeabitofaquibble.Gentryisclearlyspeakingaboutthefulfillmentofcertainpredictedevents.Whatcaneasilygetlostinthequibbleistheclearpositiontakenbyfullpreterists:thespecificeschatologicaleventspredictedintheNewTestament,suchasthesecondadvent,theresurrectionofthedead,therapture,andthelastjudgment,havealreadytakenplace.Thispositionisgreetedbypartialpreteristswiththechargeofheresyand
heterodoxy.Fullpreteristsagreethattheirviewsdepartfromcreedalorthodoxy,butinsisttheydonotdepartfrombiblicalorthodoxy.BothsidesagreethatinthefinalanalysisthetestfororthodoxymustbetheBible,notthecreeds.OnepointofcreedalorthodoxyistheApostle’sCreed’saffirmationofthe
resurrectionofthebody(carnisresurrectionem).ThisaffirmationreferstotheresurrectionnotofChrist’sbody(whichisaffirmedearlierinthecreed),butofourbodies.ItdeclaresthatChristianswillparticipateinthebodilyresurrectionofChristwhenourbodiesareraisedandglorifiedonthelastday.Thisviewiscategoricallyrejectedbyfullpreteristsandconstitutesamajordifferencebetweenthetwoviews.
TheResurrectionoftheBody
Thechieftextfocusingontheresurrectionofthebodyisfoundin1Corinthians15.
NowthisIsay,brethren,thatfleshandbloodcannotinheritthekingdomofGod;nordoescorruptioninheritincorruption.Behold,Itellyouamystery:Weshallnotallsleep,butweshallallbechanged—inamoment,inthetwinklingofaneye,atthelasttrumpet.Forthetrumpetwillsound,andthedeadwillberaisedincorruptible,andweshallbechanged.Forthiscorruptiblemustputonincorruption,
andthismortalmustputonimmortality.Sowhenthiscorruptiblehasputonincorruption,andthismortalhasputonimmortality,thenshallbebroughttopassthesayingthatiswritten:“Deathisswallowedupinvictory.”
“ODeath,whereisyoursting?
OHades,whereisyourvictory?”
Thestingofdeathissin,andthestrengthofsinisthelaw.ButthanksbetoGod,whogivesusthevictorythroughourLordJesusChrist.Therefore,my
belovedbrethren,besteadfast,immovable,alwaysaboundingintheworkoftheLord,knowingthatyourlaborisnotinvainintheLord(1Cor.15:50–58).
Fullpreteristsmaketwostrongassertionsaboutthistext:Itreferstoaspiritualresurrection,notabodilyresurrection;andthisresurrectionhasalreadytakenplace.Againthetime-frameiscrucialtothediscussion.Russellstressestheapostle’swordsinverse51:“Weshallnotallsleep,butweshallallbechanged....”“Towhomdoestheapostlereferwhenhesays,‘Weshallnotallsleep,’etc.?”Russellasks.“Isittosomehypotheticalpersonslivinginsomedistantageoftime,orisitoftheCorinthiansandhimselfthatheisthinking?WhyshouldhethinkofthedistantfuturewhenitiscertainthatheconsideredtheParousiatobeimminent?”8AccordingtoRussellmostofthosewhoreceivedPaul’slettertothe
Corinthianscouldhavelived,andwouldhaveexpectedtolive,longenoughtoseetheeventsPauldescribed.Tomaintainthattheseeventswereindeedfulfilledinthefirstcentury,onemustinterprettherelevantpassagesinawaythatmakesearlyfulfillmentpossible.Themostsevereobstacleistheabsenceofanyhistoricalrecordthattheraptureofthelivingandtheresurrectionofthedeadoccurred.SoRussellandotherfullpreteristsconceiveoftheresurrectionofthedeadinspiritualterms.Russellanticipatesthisobjection:
Buttheobjectionwillrecur,Howcouldallthistakeplacewithoutnoticeorrecord?First,asregardstheresurrectionofthedead,itistobeconsideredhowlittleweknowofitsconditionsandcharacteristics.Mustitcomewithobservation?Mustitbecognizablebymaterialorgans?“Itisraisedaspiritualbody.”Isaspiritualbodyonewhichcanbeseen,touched,handled?Wearenotcertainthattheeyecanseethespiritual,orthehandgrasptheimmaterial.Onthecontrary,thepresumptionandtheprobabilityarethattheycannot.Allthisresurrectionofthedeadandtransmutationofthelivingtakeplaceintheregionofthespiritual,intowhichearthlyspectatorsandreportersdonotenter,andcouldseenothingiftheydid.9
HereweseeamarkedchangeinRussell’sexegeticalapproachfromtheoneheappliedtothetime-framereferencesintheOlivetDiscourse.IntheOlivetDiscoursetheinterpreterfacestheproblemofdealingwithbothtime-frame
referencesandreferencestotheparousia.Aswehaveseen,somecommentators“spiritualize”thetime-framelanguageandseeitasbeingsomewhatfigurative,whileinterpretingimagesthatdescribetheparousiamoreliterally.Russelltreatsthetime-framereferencesliterallyandtheparousiaimagesfiguratively.InthisrespecthehastheprecedentofOldTestament–judgmentprophecyonhisside.WhenwegettotheCorinthiancorrespondence,wenoticetwothings
immediately.Thefirstisthatthetime-frameadoptedbyRussellisbasednotonanexplicitchronologicalreference,butonaninferencedrawnfromPaul’swords“weshallnotallsleep.”IfweconcludethatPaul,bydivineinspiration,ispredictingthattheresurrectionwilloccurwhileheisstillalive,thentheresurrectionoccurredatleastfiveyearspriortothedestructionofJerusalem(PaulwasmartyredunderNeroinAD65).Thefullpreteristmightarguethatthe“we”doesnotincludePaulhimself,but
simplysomewhoreceivedhisteaching.Butifthisisthecase,thenitislikewisepossiblethatthe“wewhoarealive”canbeevenmoreinclusiveandreferstoanyreaderoftheCorinthiantextinthefuture.The“we”passageof1Corinthiansisfarlessspecificconcerningthetimeof
theresurrectionthanareJesus’swordsintheOlivetDiscourse.Themoreseriousproblem,however,isthefullpreterists’treatmentofthecharacteroftheresurrection.Theyviewtheresurrectionasahidden,“spiritual”resurrection,andtheymustviewitthiswayforfullpreterismtowork.Weencountertwomore-seriousproblemswiththisview.Thefirstislogical,
thesecondtheological.Thelogicaldifficultyisthatitinvolvespropositionsandassertionsthatcanbeneitherverifiednorfalsifiedempirically.Tobesure,purelyrationalargumentsthatrestsolelyondeductiondonotrequireempiricalverification.Butifoneannouncesorpredictsthingsthatwilltakeplaceinthearenaofrealhistoryinvolvingphysicalreality,thenempiricalverificationbecomesrelevantandcrucial.Russelllaborsthepointthataspiritualbodyneednotberesurrectedunderthe
conditionsofempiricalobservation.Heasksifaspiritualbodycanbeseen,touched,orhandled?Paul’suseofthetermspiritualbodyiswhatgiveslicensetothistypeofspeculation.ItisunfortunatethattheapostlefailedtoalerttheCorinthians—andus,byextension—thathewasspeakingofasecret,hidden,spiritualresurrection.Hislanguagecertainlysuggestssomethingelse,particularlyasPaulsoclearlyconjoinstheresurrectionofourbodieswiththeresurrectionofChrist’sbody.TheresurrectedChrististhefirstfruitsofallwhowillberaised.TheapostleclearlyteachesthatourresurrectionswillbepatternedaftertheresurrectionofChrist:
ButnowChristisrisenfromthedead,andhasbecomethefirstfruitsofthosewhohavefallenasleep.Forsincebymancamedeath,byManalsocametheresurrectionofthedead.ForasinAdamalldie,evensoinChristallshallbemadealive.Buteachoneinhisownorder:Christthefirstfruits,afterwardthosewhoareChrist’sathiscoming.Thencomestheend,whenhedeliversthekingdomtoGodtheFather,whenheputsanendtoallruleandallauthorityandpower.Forhemustreigntillhehasputallenemiesunderhisfeet.Thelastenemythatwillbedestroyedisdeath(1Cor.15:20–26).
TheNewTestamentaccountsofChrist’sresurrectionrevealthatinhisresurrectedbodythereisbothcontinuityanddiscontinuity.Obviouslyhisbodyunderwentsomesortofchange.Itbecameaglorifiedhumanbody.Totheextentthatthisglorificationinvolvedchangeinhisphysicalcompositionwecanspeakofdiscontinuity.ButtheBiblelaysgreatstressonthecontinuityofthebodythatwasplacedinthetombwiththebodythatwasraised.Itwasnotabody.Itwasthesamebody.Myhumanbodyhasnotbeenglorified.Itundergoescertainbiologicaland
chemicalchangeseverymoment.Itisconstantlyandrelentlesslyaging.Butthoughmybodyisnevertotallythesamefrommomenttomoment,itisneverthelesssubstantiallythesame.ThebodyIhadyesterdaywasnotannihilatedandreplacedwithanutterlynewbodytoday.Despitethechangestakingplaceinmybodyatthemoment,thereremainsarealcontinuitywithmyformerbody.MypresentbodycontainsteeththatIhavehadfordecadesandscarsthathaveblemishedmyskinsincechildhood.WhenweassertofJesusthatthesamebodythatdiedonthecrossandwas
buriedinthetombwasthenresurrected,weacknowledgethathisbodyunderwentcertainchanges.Butitiscrucialthataftertheresurrection,thetombwasempty.TodaythegravesofthesaintswhohavediedsincethedestructionofJerusalemarenotempty.Ifthesebodieshadbeenresurrected,therewouldbearadicaldiscontinuitybetweenthemandthebodiesthathadbeenburied.Indeedthediscontinuitywouldbesoprofoundthatitwouldprobablybemoreaccuratetosaythattheyhadbeen“reincarnated”ratherthanresurrected,orthatresurrectionissuchaspiritualthingthatneitherthebodynorphysicalmatterofanytypehasanythingtodowithit.
InvisibleandUntouchable?
Russellsaysthatperhapsourspiritualbodiesmaynotbeseen,touched,orhandled.Ifthatisthecase,thennotonlyisthereradicaldiscontinuitybetweenourearthlybodiesandourheavenlybodies,butalsothereisaradical
discontinuitybetweenthenatureofourresurrectedbodiesandthenatureofChrist’s.InhisresurrectedstateChristwasseen,touched,andhandled.Againtoarguethattheresurrectionappliesexclusivelytotherealmofthe
spiritualistomakeitnonverifiableandnonfalsifiable.Thisisdangerousbusiness.Itsmacksofthetypeofargumentonehearsonbehalfofpoltergeists.Somearguethatpoltergeistsareallergictoscientistsandalwaysdisappearwhenonecomesnear.Somearguethatlittlegreenmenonthemoonhaveabuilt-inantipathytotelescopes.Theexistenceofsuchthingscanneverbefalsifiedbecausethetermsoffalsificationarelimitedattheoutset.ThisisnottosaythatRussellisarguinginidenticalformtothosewhoavow
theexistenceofpoltergeistsorlittlegreenmen.RussellistryingtodealseriouslywithScripture,whichhebelievesistheinfallibleWordofGod.Mypoint,however,isthathisargumentsconcerningresurrectionarefraughtwithperilandbegthequestion.ForRussell’sargumentstoworktheymustbesqueezedintoaframeworkthat
alsoraisesserioustheologicalquestions.Aswehavealreadyindicated,hisargumentsraisequestionsconcerningthenature,notonlyofourresurrectedbodies,butalsoofChrist’sresurrectedbody.Ifaspiritualbodycannotbeseen,touched,orhandled,isitabodyatall?Itisonethingtosaythatourresurrectedbodieswillbespiritualbodies,butquiteanothertoimplythatourresurrectedbodieswillbemerelyspirits.TheBiblespeaksofspiritualbodies.Thoughthebodywillundergochangesduringitsglorification,itwillstillbeabody.Russellconcludeshisanalysisof1Corinthians15byreducingtheproblemof
interpretationtothefollowingdilemma:(1)EitherPaulwasguidedbytheSpiritofGodandtheeventsPaulpredictedcametopass,or(2)theapostlewasmistakenandtheseeventsdidnottakeplace.Weagreethatiftheproblemisstatedinthismanner,option1ispreferable.Russell’sconclusion,however,stronglyimpliesthefallacyofthefalsedilemma,alsocalledthe“either/or”fallacy.Thismeansthattheoptionsarereducedtotwowhentheremaybemorealternatives.RussellimpliesinthecontextthatPaulcouldhavebeenspeakingthetruth
onlyifhewasspeakingofaspiritualresurrection.ThisapproachisdrivenbyRussell’sconvictionthatalleschatologicaleventspredictedintheNewTestamentfallwithintheframeworkofthedestructionofJerusalem.Heassumesthattheonlymeaningfor“theend”istheendoftheJewishageandthatnothingispredictedfortheendoftheworld.HeviewsthejudgmentofGodonIsraelasthelastandfinaljudgment.InourdayMaxR.Kinghaswrittenvoluminouslyinsupportoffullpreterism
andaspiritualresurrection.Hearguesthattherearethreesuccessivestagesin
theresurrectionofthedead.Hesetstheseforthasfollows:
Concerningstage1,theresurrectionofChristmarkedthebeginningoftheresurrectionofthedead.Hewasthefirstfruitsofthemthatslept(1Cor.15:20).HisMessianic(age-ending)reignbeganafterhisresurrectionbecausehiskingdomwasnot“ofthisworld”;i.e.,notoftheOldCovenantaeon(John18:36).Concerningstage2,thedeathandresurrectionofthepre–end-of-the-agesaintscoversthetimeof
Christ’spre-parousiareignfromthecrosstotheAD70endoftheage.Itisthecompletionofthefirstresurrection.ThefirstfruitsdieandrisewithChristinthesenseofdyingtotheoldaeonandrisingtothenew,hencetheyliveandreignwithhiminthateschatologicalperiodwhichanswerstothesymbolic“thousandyearreign.”TheyreignwithChrist(Rev.20[:4–5]).Concerningstage3,theuniversalresurrectionisconjoinedwiththeultimateestablishmentofGod’s
universalreignat“theend.”ThisendisthesameendasMatthew24:3,14—theendoftheJewishage.ThiswasthefocalpointoftheultimatecomingofthekingdomofGodinDaniel7,theOlivetDiscourseofChrist(Luke21:31),andthepost-Pentecostapostolicwritings(Acts14:22;Heb.12:28;2Pet.1:11;Rev.11:15).ItwasallachievedfromthebeginningofChrist’sreigntotheconsummatedcomingofGod’skingdom,withintheend-timeperiodofChrist’seschatologicalsayings(Matt.24:34;Mark9:1;Matt.16:27,28).10
Thisschemaindicatesasingleresurrectionthattakesplaceinthreedistinctstagesduringoneeschatologicalperiod.Forthisschematowork,thetraditionalideaofresurrectionmustbereplacedwithametaphoricalideaofresurrection,dyingtoanoldredemptiveageoreonand“rising”totheneweon.Thisendoftheageistheonly“end”withwhichbiblicaleschatologyisconcerned.“Wecontend,therefore,”Kingdeclares,“thatGod’sconsummationof
historicalIsraelthroughChristmarkedtheendofhistory....Wesuggestthattheproblemliesinthefailureofscholarstoidentifythehistorythatisinvolvedinbiblicaleschatology.Biblicalhistorydoeshavemeaning.ItsgoalhasbeenreachedinChrist.Theendforeseenbytheprophetshascome.Deathhasbeendestroyed‘inthemountainoftheLord.’TheperfectreignofGodthroughChristhasbeenestablishedin‘theagetocome.’”11WenoticeakindofequivocationhereinKing’suseofthetermend.Onthe
onehanditmeans“thecompletionofachronologicaltimeperiod.”Ontheotheritmeans“aim”or“goal.”Thetwoconceptsarenotinherentlyincompatible,becauseatemporalendmayindeedcoincidewithaparticularhistoricalgoal.ThisdistinctioniscrucialtoKing’sview,enablinghimtosaythattheconsummationofhistoricalIsrael“markedtheendofhistory.”Thisisastrangeassertion.Kingobviouslydoesnotmeanthatthebroader
movingofworldhistoryceasedinAD70.HemustmeanthattheredemptivehistoryofIsrael“ended,”thatithadreacheditsgoal.EdwardE.Stevensindicatesthatthefull-preteristviewoftheresurrectionis
notmonolithic.Hesays:
WithinthefullpreteristcommunitythereareatleastthreedifferentviewsregardingtheimplicationsoftheresurrectioneventfortheindividualChristian.Thatmaysoundlikealotofconfusionamongpreterists,untilyoulookatthelegionofviewsamongfuturists.MaxKinghassuggestedanapproachwhichfocusesalmostexclusivelyonthecollectivebodyofthechurchbeingraisedoutoftheOldTestamentJewishsystem.ThisviewhassomedifficultyexplainingthecontinuityofourresurrectionbodieswithChrist’sresurrectionbody,anditforcestheexclusivecollectivebodyconceptintopassageswhichmaybedealingwiththeindividualimplicationsoftheresurrectioninstead.J.S.RussellandMiltonS.Terryhavesuggestedaresurrection(intheunseenrealm)andaliteral(butunnoticed)raptureatAD70(the“change”)forwhich(sofar)nohistoricalevidencehassurfaced.Othershaveproposedaresurrectionofthedeadintheheavenlyrealmwithvisiblesignsbeinggiveninthephysicalrealm,andsaythattheraptureisjustanotherdescriptionoftheinvisible“gathering”intothepresenceofGodatAD70.Iwouldtendtofavorthislatterview,althoughRussellandTerry’sideacannotbelightlydismissed.12
StevensbristlesagainstGentry’schargethatfullpreterismslipsintoakindofgnosticismwithrespecttotheresurrection.StevenscitestheworkofMurrayJ.Harris13tosteeracoursebetweenatotallyspiritualizedviewoftheresurrectionandaviewoffullbodilyresurrection.ItseemstomethatStevensandotherfullpreteristshecitesgomoreinthedirectionofgnosticismthanHarrisdoes.
TheRaptureoftheLiving
ThedebateoverthenatureandtimeoftheresurrectioniscloselylinkedwithPaul’steachingregardingtherapture.PaulsetsthisforthinhisFirstEpistletotheThessalonians:
ButIdonotwantyoutobeignorant,brethren,concerningthosewhohavefallenasleep,lestyousorrowasotherswhohavenohope.ForifwebelievethatJesusdiedandroseagain,evensoGodwillbringwithhimthosewhosleepinJesus.ForthiswesaytoyoubythewordoftheLord,thatwewhoarealiveandremainuntilthecomingoftheLordwillbynomeansprecedethosewhoareasleep.FortheLordhimselfwilldescendfromheavenwithashout,withthevoiceofanarchangel,andwiththetrumpetofGod.AndthedeadinChristwillrisefirst.ThenwewhoarealiveandremainshallbecaughtuptogetherwiththeminthecloudstomeettheLordintheair.AndthusweshallalwaysbewiththeLord.Thereforecomfortoneanotherwiththesewords(1Thess.4:13–18).
RusselltreatsthistextregardingtheraptureinmuchthesamewayhetreatsPaul’steachingonresurrectionin1Corinthians15.Russellarguesthatthephrase“wewhoarealive”(1Thess.4:17)indicatesthattheapostleexpectedtherapturetooccurinhisownlifetime.RusselllinkstherapturewiththecomingofChristinjudgmentonJerusalem:“Itmaybesaidthatwehavenoevidenceofsuchfactshavingoccurredasareheredescribed—theLorddescendingwithashout,thesoundingofthetrumpet,theraisingofthesleepingdead,therapture
ofthelivingsaints.True,butisitcertainthatthesearefactscognisablebythesenses?Istheirplaceintheregionofthematerialandthevisible?”14Tomaintainapastfulfillmentoftherapture,Russellarguesfora“secret”
rapturethattakesplaceinthenon-physical,spiritualrealm.Headmitsthereisnoevidencethattheseeventsoccurredasdescribed.Butthisisbecausetheeventsdescribedtookplaceinthenon-sensoryrealm.Ifthisisthecase,whydidtheapostleusethelanguagehedid?Hesaidthe
Lordwoulddescendwithashout,butRussellsaysnobodycouldhearit.Thevoiceofthearchangelissilent,andthetrumpetofGodismute.Notonlythis,butthemultitudeoftherisingdeadwerecaughtupinvisiblyintoinvisiblecloudstomeettheinvisible,comingLord.Thisraisesseverequestionsofhermeneutics.Onecanlegitimatelytakethe
descriptivelanguageoftheOlivetDiscourseinafigurativeway,becausethelanguageissosimilartoOldTestamentpropheticimagery.ButPaul’slanguagein1Thessalonians4isclearlyofadifferentsort.HerethegenreofthetextmakesithighlyunlikelythatPaulwasdescribinganeventhiddenfromearthlyview.MaxR.Kingarguesthatthelanguageoftherapture,likethatoftheOlivet
Discourse,isapocalypticimagery.“IntheseandotherrelatedpassagesdealingwiththeEnd,ortheDayoftheLord,thesoundingofthetrumpetisnottobeunderstoodinaliteralsense,”Kingwrites.“Thelanguageissymbolic,callingattentiontotheeschatologicalactionofGodintheconsummationoftheage.BeingcaughtuptogetherinthecloudstomeettheLordintheairsimplyisaccommodativelanguagedenotingtheend-of-the-agegatheringtogetherofGod’select”(Eph.1:10).15KinglinksthetrumpetimagewiththatusedintheOlivetDiscourseinMatthew24:31.Inbothlociheseesitasthesymbolofaspiritualtruth.OthershavearguedthatthedescriptionoftheraptureadaptsaRoman
ceremonyofvictoryandisthereforesymbolic.Paulfrequentlyborrowssuchimagesfromthen-contemporaryculture,suchas“leadingcaptivitycaptive.”WhenlegionnairesreturnedtoRomefromamilitaryconquest,theywould
encamptemporarilyoutsidethecitywhilepreparationsweremadetocelebratethevictory.Garlandswerespreadinthestreetstoovercometheodorofthefilthyandsweatingslavesthatwouldmarchinbondageintothecity.Anarchwasconstructedthroughwhichtheconqueringarmymarchedina“ticker-tape”parade.Wheneverythingwasready,atrumpetalertedthecitizenstogooutandjointhereturningvictorsintheparade.ThesoldiershadcarriedintobattletheirbanneremblazonedwiththelettersSPQR,whichstoodforthemottooftheSenate
andthepeopleofRome.SincethesoldiersrepresentedtheSenateandthepeople,bothgroupswereinvitedtojointhevictoriousentourage.
Table7.2ThePartial-PreteristView
AD70 Stillfuture
Acoming(parousia)ofChrist Thecoming(parousia)ofChrist
AdayoftheLord ThedayoftheLord
Theresurrectionofthedead
Theraptureoftheliving
Ajudgment The(final)judgment
TheendoftheJewishage Theendofhistory
InlikemannertheraptureimagerymayhavebeendesignedtocommunicatethatthepeopleofChristwouldjoinhiminhistriumphantreturn.Theraptureimagerymaybesymbolicinthissense,intermsofwhattherapturerepresents.Buttheraptureimageryisnotsymbolicinthesensethattheraptureisaltogetherinvisible.Inconclusion,thechiefdifferencebetweenfullpreteristsandpartialpreterists
hastodowiththetimeofthegreatresurrection.DavidChilton(beforehisallegedconversiontofullpreterism)summeditupinthefollowingmanner:“WecanaddtothiswhattheApostlePaultellsusabouttheResurrection:itwillcoincidewiththeSecondComingofChristandtheRaptureoflivingbelievers(1Thess.4:16–17).Somehavetriedtoevadetheforceofthistextbysuggestingaseriesofresurrections—oneattheRapture,anotherattheSecondComing(perhapssomeyearslater),andatleastonemoreattheconsummationoftheKingdom,theendofhistory(whereitbelongs)....Obviously,intermsofthesetexts,therecanbeonlyoneResurrectionofbelievers.AndthisResurrection,whichcoincideswiththeRapture,willtakeplaceontheLastDay.”16Thedisputefocusesonthemeaningofthelastday.Forthefullpreteristall
referencestotheendandtothedayoftheLordpointtothedestructionofJerusalem.Thisistheonly“secondcoming”orparousiaofJesus.Partialpreteristsmakeasharpdistinctionbetween(1)thejudgment-comingofChristtotheJewsattheendoftheJewishageand(2)hisparousiaandfinalcomingtotheworldattheendofhistory.Forthefullpreteristthegreatresurrectionandtheraptureoccurredinthepast.Forthepartialpreteristtheyremaininthefuture.
8WHOISTHEANTICHRIST?
ThisisthespiritoftheAntichrist,whichyouhaveheardwascoming,andisnowalreadyintheworld.
1John4:3
PerhapsthereisnogreatermysteryassociatedwiththeNewTestamentrecordthantheidentityoftheantichrist.Theverymentionofthewordconjuresupdiabolicalcreaturessuchas“Rosemary’sBaby,”orofahumanbeingofsuchunrestrainedwickednessthattheverymentionofhisnameevokesterror.TheLeftBehindseriesofbooksdramatizedthecomingoftheantichristinthefictionalfigureofNicolaeCarpathia.Futuristsineschatologyregularlyannouncethelatestcandidateforthepositionoftheantichrist.JeaneDixonpredictedthatwewillseetheantichristinourgenerationbecausehehasalreadybeenborn.ThetermantichristisintroducedintheNewTestamentbytheApostleJohn.
Hespeaksoftheantichristinhisfirstepistle:“Littlechildren,itisthelasthour;andasyouhaveheardthattheAntichristiscoming,evennowmanyantichristshavecome,bywhichweknowthatitisthelasthour.Theywentoutfromus,buttheywerenotofus;foriftheyhadbeenofus,theywouldhavecontinuedwithus;buttheywentoutthattheymightbemademanifest,thatnoneofthemwereofus.ButyouhaveananointingfromtheHolyOne,andyouknowallthings”(1John2:18–20).Thispassageincludesseveralenigmaticelements.Thefirstisthetime-frame
reference:“itisthelasthour.”Thisuniquephraseissomewhatdifficulttounderstand.Wemustaskthequestion,“Thisisthelasthourofwhat?”Jesusspokeofhis“hour”(Matt.26:45),whichhasbeeninterpretedtomeanthehour
ofhisdeathorthehourofhisreturntoheavenlyglory,bothofwhichoccurredinthefirstcentury.ButhereJohnisspeaking,notofthelasthourofChrist,butofthelasthourofsomethingelse.IsitthelasthouroftheJewishAge?Isitthelasthourofworldhistory?Inotherwords,isitalasthourthathasalreadyelapsed,orisitthelasthourofallhumanhistory?Thosewhounderstandittobethelasthourofhumanhistoryfallintotwo
basicgroups.Firstarebiblicalcriticswhocitethisasonemoreexampleof“consistenteschatology,”aneschatologicalexpectationthatfailedtomaterializewithinthepredictedtime-frame.Secondarethosewhoarguethat“thelasthour”beganinNewTestamenttimesandcontinuestothisday.AlexanderRosssaysofthisphrase:Itisimportanttorememberthat,
accordingtotheNewTestament,withthecomingofChrist,withhisDeathandResurrectionandAscension,thelastperiodoftheworld’shistoryhasbegun.GodhasspokenhisfinalmessageinhisSon(Heb.1:2).Noeventintheworld’shistorycaneverequalinepoch-makingimportancethecomingofChristtillhecomesagain.TheChristianera,asithasbeenput,is“thelastontheDivineprogram;thenextwillbethecomingoftheLord.”Thatperiodhaslastedmorethan1900yearssinceJohnwrotethewordsbeforeusanditmaylastsometimeyet,but,apartfromitsduration,itcanbethoughtofbeing,inaveryrealsense,thelasthour.Itis“thelasttime,”as[John]Calvinsays,“inwhichallthingsaresocompletedthatnothingremainsexceptthefinalrevelationofChrist.”1
Tounderstandthisapproach,wemustdistinguishbetweenthetermlastinthisinterpretationandthetermfinal.PerhapsabetterwordtoexpresstheviewofCalvincitedbyRossisthatitisthe“main”or“chief”redemptive-historicalhour,butcertainlynotthe“final”hour.WhateverJohnmeansby“thelasthour,”heregardsitaspresent.Twicehe
saysitisthelasthour.Heassertsthatthisiscertainduetothepresenceoftheantichrist.Hespeaksoftheantichristinbothpastandfuturetenses.Ontheonehand,theantichristiscoming.Inthiscasethatwhichiscominghasnotyetarrived.HereJohnspeaksoftheantichristinthesingular.Butthenheadds,“manyantichristshavecome.”Hereantichristispluralandalreadypresentorpast.Basedonthepastappearancesofmanyantichrists,Johnsaysweknowthatitisthelasthour.
TheSpiritoftheAntichristJohnfurtherqualifieshisteachingregardingtheantichrist:Beloved,donotbelieve
everyspirit,buttestthespirits,whethertheyareofGod;becausemanyfalseprophetshavegoneoutintotheworld.BythisyouknowtheSpiritofGod:EveryspiritthatconfessesthatJesusChristhascomeinthefleshisofGod,andeveryspiritthatdoesnotconfessthatJesusChristhascomeinthefleshisnotofGod.AndthisisthespiritoftheAntichrist,whichyouhaveheardwascoming,andisnowalreadyintheworld.YouareofGod,littlechildren,andhaveovercomethem,becausehewhoisinyouisgreaterthanhewhoisintheworld(1John4:1–4).
InthistextJohnspeaksofthespiritoftheantichrist.Hisreadershadheardthattheantichristwascoming,butJohnsaysheisintheworldnowandalready.Acrucialquestion,however,isthis:Whatis“alreadyintheworld”?Isitthespiritoftheantichrist,ortheantichristhimself?Toanswerthisquestionwemustconsidervariousfactors.Inthefirstplacethe
Greektextdoesnotincludethefullphrase“AndthisisthespiritoftheAntichrist.”TheGreektextsimplysays,“AndthisisoftheAntichrist.”InthecontextJohnhasbeenspeakingofspiritsthatconfessChrist’scominginthefleshandofspiritsthatdenyit.Johnthenconcludesthat“thisisoftheAntichrist.”Translatorsaddthewordsthespiritinitalicstosignaltothereaderthattheyhaveaddedorsuppliedthewords.Giventhecontextualdiscussionconcerningspirits,bothpositiveandnegative,theadditionof“thespirit”seemstometobewarranted.Morecrucialisthisquestion:Whatistheantecedentofwhichinthephrase
“whichyouhaveheardwascoming,andisnowalreadyintheworld.”IsJohnsayingthat,whiletheantichrist’sspiritisalreadyintheworld,theantichristhimselfisnotyetintheworld?Ifso,thenthedoorisleftopenforafutureappearanceoftheantichristattheendofworldhistory.Thisseemstobetheviewofthemajorityofevangelicalscholars.Anotherpossibilityisthattheantichristhimself,andnotmerelyhisspirit,is
alreadyintheworldduringthefirstcentury.Inthiscase,twomoreoptionssurface.Oneisthattheantichrist,thoughappearingintheworldinthefirstcentury,hascontinuedhisactivitythroughoutworldhistorydowntoourday.ThisviewwoulddisqualifyanyhumanfrombeingtheantichristunlessGodaccordedthispersonmiraculouslongevity.
TheotheroptionisthattheantichristwaspresentintheworldwhenJohnwrotethisepistleandtheantichrist’sworkwaslimitedtothefirstcentury.Grammaticallyspeaking,theantecedentofwhichshouldbe“theAntichrist,”
notmerely“thespiritoftheAntichrist.”Ifthisiscorrect,thenwemustconcludethattheantichristofwhomJohnwroteappearedinthefirstcentury.EvenifJohn’santichristwasaspecificpersoninthefirstcentury,thisdoes
notprecludethepossibilityofotherantichristsappearingatvarioustimes,orevencontinuously,throughoutchurchhistory.ThisspeculationgainsatleastsomecredencefromJohn’sreferencetothe“manyantichrists”(1John2:18)whohadprecededtheantichrist.BecauseJohnrefersto“manyantichrists,”manyscholarshaveconcludedthat
thetermantichristrefersnottoaspecificindividualoraseriesofindividuals,buttoinstitutionsorasystemofteachinglinkedtofalseprophets.Someconcludethatantichristisaspecificpersonbyidentifyinghimwith“themanoflawlessness”mentionedbytheApostlePaul,orwiththebeastofthebookofRevelation.ButneitherPaulnortheApocalypsespecificallyusesthetermantichrist.Again,theonlyexplicitreferencestotheantichristoccurintheepistlesofJohn.DavidChiltonarguesthatthetermantichristrefersbothtoasystemof
unbelief(theheresythatdeniedtherealityoftheincarnation,particularlyinthemannerofearlyGnosticism),andtoapostateindividuals(likethefirst-centuryheresiarchCerinthus).“Puttingallthistogether,”Chiltonwrites,“wecanseethatantichristisadescriptionofboththesystemofapostasyandindividualapostates.Inotherwords,antichristwasthefulfillmentofJesus’sprophecythatatimeofgreatapostasywouldcome,when‘manywillfallawayandwillbetrayoneanotherandhateoneanother.Andmanyfalseprophetswillarise,andwillmisleadmany’(Matt.24:10–11)....Whenthedoctrineofantichristisunderstood,itfitsinperfectlywithwhattherestoftheNewTestamenttellsusabouttheageofthe‘terminalgeneration.’”2G.C.Berkouwersummarizesthedebatebysaying:“Acommonsolutionisto
distinguishbetween‘forerunners’(antichrists)andtheantichrist.The‘antichrists’arepresentlywithus;the‘antichrist’willappearattheendofhistory.Inthissense[Herman]Bavinckreferredtotheantichristianpowersthroughouthistory,butbelievedthatonedaythesepowerswouldbeembodiedinonekingdomoftheworld,theapotheosisofapostasy.Atanyrate,whetherJohnistalkingaboutantichristsortheantichrist,thecruxofhismessageisawarning.Thecentralmeaningoftheantichrist,accordingtoJohn,isthegreatlie,thedenialthatJesusistheChrist.”3
BerkouwerhimselfrejectsBavinck’sviewthattheantichristsaremere“forerunners.”Berkouwerseestheantichristasanalarmsignaltothechurchofallages.Thisdoesnotanswerthequestion,however,ofwhethertheantichristofwhomJohnwarnedwasaspecificpersonwhohadappearedinthefirstcentury.John’suseofthemasculinesingulartorefertotheantichristmilitatesagainsttheantichristbeingavagueinstitution,thoughitdoesnotprecludeitabsolutely.AlexanderRossstronglyavowsthattheantichristisnotaninstitutionbuta
person.HearguesthispointbylinkingJohn’santichristwithPaul’s“manoflawlessness,”whoclearlyisdescribedinpersonalterms.“If,asis...almostcertainlythecase,John’sAntichrististobeidentifiedwithPaul’s‘manoflawlessness’”(2Thess.2:3),Rosssays,“thepersonalityofAntichristisclearlyproved....OutsidetheNewTestament,wefindwriterslikeJustinMartyr,Irenaeus,Tertullian,andJeromedealingfrequentlywiththesubjectofAntichrist,andallofthesetakeAntichristtobeaperson.”4Thewordantichristiscapableofmorethanonemeaningornuance,
dependingonhowweunderstandtheprefixanti-.Theprefixnormallymeans“against”andsuggestssomeonewhoisinoppositiontosomething.InthissenseantichristreferstosomeonewhostandsinoppositiontoChristandwhoishisveryantithesis.WegenerallyusetheEnglishprefixanti-inthesamemannertorefertosomeoneorsomethingthatisagainstorinoppositiontosomethingelse.InGreektheprefixanti-canalsobetranslated“inplaceof.”Thatwhichis
“anti”mayfunctionasareplacementorsubstituteforsomething.Theologianscallthistheimitationmotif.SowemightviewtheantichristasafalseChrist,orasonewhoseekstousurptherightfulplaceofChrist.HeisafakeorcounterfeitChrist.Thus“imitation”referstothatwhichisnotgenuinebutcounterfeit.Itisnotnecessarytochoosebetweenthesenuancesoftheprefix.Itis
possible,ifnotprobable,thattheconceptofantichristcontainsbothelements.Attheveryleasttheantichristisonewhostandsandworks“against”Christ.If,however,healsoseekstobeasubstituteforChrist,thenthelinktothemanoflawlessnessisevenmoreenticing.
TheManofLawlessnessPaulintroducesthemanoflawlessnessinhisSecondEpistletotheThessalonians.
Letnoonedeceiveyoubyanymeans;forthatDaywillnotcomeunlessthefallingawaycomesfirst,andthemanofsinisrevealed,thesonofperdition,whoopposesandexaltshimselfaboveallthatiscalledGodorthatisworshiped,sothathesitsasGodinthetempleofGod,showinghimselfthatheisGod.DoyounotrememberthatwhenIwasstillwithyouItoldyouthesethings?Andnowyouknowwhatisrestraining,thathemayberevealedinhisowntime.Forthemysteryoflawlessnessisalready
atwork;onlyhewhonowrestrainswilldosountilheistakenoutoftheway.Andthenthelawlessonewillberevealed,whomtheLordwillconsumewiththebreathofhismouthanddestroywiththebrightnessofhiscoming.ThecomingofthelawlessoneisaccordingtotheworkingofSatan,withallpower,signs,andlyingwonders,andwithallunrighteousdeceptionamongthosewhoperish,becausetheydidnotreceivetheloveofthetruth,thattheymightbesaved.AndforthisreasonGodwillsendthemstrongdelusion,thattheyshouldbelievethelie...(2Thess.2:3–11).
Paul’smanofsinorlawlessnessisoftenlinkedtooridentifiedwiththeantichrist.Ifindeedbothnamesrefertothesamething,thenPaulhasshedconsiderablelightonthenatureandcharacteroftheantichrist.First,themanofsinisidentifiedasaman.Thiswouldtendtoeliminateinstitutionsfrombeingtheantichrist,exceptwhenaninstitutioncanbeembodiedinasingleindividual.TheReformerscommonlyconsideredthepapacyastheantichrist,aninstitutionthatcouldbeembodiedinaparticularpope.LikewisesomehaveseenthegovernmentoftheRomanEmpireastheantichrist,whichcouldbeembodiedinaspecificemperor.Second,themanofsin’slawlessbehaviorhasastrongreligiousdimension.
Heis“thesonofperdition”whonotonly“opposes”Godbutalso“exaltshimselfabove...God”(2Thess.2:3–4).Throughakindofself-apotheosis,thismanclaimsforhimselfnothingshortofdeity.Pauldoesnotcallhim“antichrist”here,butPauldoesdescribehisactivityintermsofbeingbothagainstChristandasubstituteforChrist.Paulsaysthemanofsin“sitsasGodinthetempleofGod”(2Thess.2:4).Thissuggeststhatthisarrogantpersonwillappearwhenthetempleisinplace,thoughconceivablythetermtemplemerelydesignatesareligiouslocale.JohnCalvin,forexample,hadnoproblemseeingthisasanallusiontothe
church.“Thisoneword[inthetempleofGod]fullyrefutestheerrororratherstupidityofthosewhoholdthePopetobethevicarofChristonthegroundthathehasasettledresidenceintheChurch,howeverhemayconducthimself,”Calvinwrites.“PaulsetsAntichristintheverysanctuaryofGod.Heisnotanenemyfromtheoutsidebutfromthehouseholdoffaith,andopposesChristundertheverynameofChrist.”5Third,Paulcommentsonwhenthemanoflawlessnesswillappear.Paulwrote
totheThessaloniansthatthe“dayofChrist”hadnotyetcome.Paulsaidthatdaywouldnotcomeuntiltheapostasy(orfallingaway)occursandthemanofsinisrevealed(2Thess.2:3).Whattheapostlesaysnextisthesubjectofgreatdebateregardingthetiming
ofthemanofsin’sappearance.Paulindicatesthatthe“restrainer,”whomhisreaderscanidentify,ispresent(2Thess.2:7).Thisonewhorestrainshasbeen
identifiedbymoderncommentatorsastheRomangovernment,Paulhimself,andtheHolySpirit.ThelatterisafavoritetheoryofsomeDispensationalistswhoseeinthistexta
thinlyveiledreferencetotherapture.Thatis,therapturemustoccurbeforetheantichristisunleashed.Fortheantichristtooperatewithoutrestraint,theHolySpiritmustbefirstremoved.ForthistooccurtheChristiancommunitymustbephysicallyremovedfromtheearth,becauseaslongasChristiansarepresentintheworldtheHolySpiritwhoindwellsthemislikewisepresent.Whoevertherestraineris,hemustbetakenoutofthewaybeforethelawless
onecanberevealed.PauldoesemploytemporaltermssimilartoJohn’swhenhedeclaresthat“themysteryoflawlessnessisalreadyatwork”(2Thess.2:7).Paulthenstatesthat“thelawlessone”willbeconsumedbytheLordanddestroyed“withthebrightnessofhiscoming”(2Thess.2:8).Thesestatementsimplythat,thoughthemanoflawlessnesswasalreadyatwork,hewasnotyetclearlymanifesttoPaul’scontemporaries.Thisman’sworkwouldcontinueuntilChristcameandhewasconsumed.Againthequestionoftime-framebecomescritical.WasPaulspeakingofa
first-centurypersonwhowouldsoonbemademanifestandthenbedestroyedbythejudgment-comingofChristinAD70?OrwasPaulspeakingofonewho,thoughalreadyatworkinthefirstcentury,wouldnotbefullyrevealeduntilsometimeneartheendofhistoryasaprecursortothecomingofJesus?BenjaminBreckinridgeWarfield,citedbyGaryDeMar,arguesthatPaul’s
manoflawlessnesswasacontemporary.Warfieldwrites:Thewithholdingpowerisalreadypresent.AlthoughtheManofSinisnotyetrevealed,asamysteryhisessential“lawlessness”isalreadyworking—“onlyuntilthepresentrestrainerberemovedfromthemidst.”Heexpectshimtositinthe“templeofGod,”whichperhapsmostnaturallyreferstotheliteraltempleinJerusalem,althoughtheApostleknewthattheout-pouringofGod’swrathontheJewswascloseathand(1Thess.2:16).AndifwecomparethedescriptionwhichtheApostlegivesofhimwithourLord’saddressontheMountofOlives(Matt.24),towhich,aswehavealreadyhinted,Paulmakesobviousallusion,itbecomesatonceinthehighestdegreeprobablethatinthewords,“hethatexaltethhimselfagainstallthatiscalledGod,orisworshiped,sothathesittethinthesanctuaryofGodshowinghimselfthatheisGod,”PaulcanhavenothingelseinviewthanwhatourLorddescribedas“theabominationofdesolationwhichwasspokenofbyDanieltheprophet,standingintheholyplace”(Matt.24:15);andthisourLordconnectsimmediatelywiththebeleagueringofJerusalem(cf.Luke21:20).6
DeMararguesthattheapostasyofwhichPaulspeaks(2Thess.2:3)wasalreadyinmotionandwasprobablyJewishratherthanChristianinnature.PaulisreferringtothefallingawayofJewswhorejectedChrist,nottoanapostasyofthechurchattheendofhistory.AgainDeMarquotesWarfield,whowrites:Inthisinterpretation,theapostasyisobviouslythegreatapostasyoftheJews,graduallyfillingupalltheseyearsandhasteningtoitscompletionintheirdestruction.ThattheApostlecertainlyhadthisrapidlycompletingapostasyinhismindintheseverearraignmentthathemakesoftheJewsin1Thessalonians2:14–16,whichreacheditsclimaxinthedeclarationthattheywerecontinuallyfillingupmoreandmorefullthemeasureoftheirsins,untilalreadythemeasureofGod’swrathwasprematurely...filledupagainstthemandwashangingoverthemlikesomeladenthunder-cloudreadytoburstandoverwhelmthem—addsanadditionalreasonforsupposinghisreferencetobetothisapostasy—aboveallothers,“the”apostasy—inthispassage.7
Inhistreatmentof2Thessalonians2:3–11,J.B.LightfootidentifiesaclearlinkbetweenJohn’santichristandPaul’smanoflawlessness.“OneoftheimportantfeaturesinthisdescriptionistheparalleldrawnbetweenChristandtheadversaryofChrist,”Lightfootwrites.“Bothalikeare‘revealed,’andtobothaliketheterm‘mystery’isapplied.Fromthiscircumstance,andfromthedescriptiongiveninverse4ofhisarrogantassumption,wecannotdoubtthatthemanofsininSt.PaulisidenticalwiththeAntichristofSt.John,theprepositioninthelattertermexpressingtheideaofantagonisticclaims.”8
TheBeastNowhereinScripturedowegetsuchagraphicpictureofawickedeschatologicalfigureastheApocalypseprovidesof“thebeast.”
ThenIstoodonthesandofthesea.AndIsawabeastrisingupoutofthesea,havingsevenheadsandtenhorns,andonhishornstencrowns,andonhisheadsablasphemousname.NowthebeastwhichIsawwaslikealeopard,hisfeetwerelikethefeetofabear,andhismouthlikethemouthofalion.Andthedragongavehimhispower,histhrone,andgreatauthority.Isawoneofhisheadsasifithadbeenmortallywounded,andhisdeadlywoundwashealed.Andalltheworldmarveledandfollowedthebeast.Sotheyworshipedthedragonwhogaveauthoritytothebeast;andtheyworshipedthebeast,saying,“Whoislikethebeast?Whoisabletomakewarwithhim?”Andhewasgivenamouthspeakinggreatthingsandblasphemies,andhewasgivenauthoritytocontinueforforty-twomonths.ThenheopenedhismouthinblasphemyagainstGod,toblasphemehisname,histabernacle,andthosewhodwellinheaven.Anditwasgrantedtohimtomakewarwiththesaintsandtoovercomethem.Andauthoritywasgivenhimovereverytribe,tongue,andnation.Andallwhodwellontheearthwillworshiphim,whosenameshavenotbeenwrittenintheBookofLifeoftheLambslainfromthe
foundationoftheworld.Ifanyonehasanear,lethimhear.Hewholeadsintocaptivityshallgointocaptivity;hewhokillswiththeswordmustbekilledwiththesword.Hereisthepatienceandthefaithofthesaints.ThenIsawanotherbeastcomingupoutoftheearth,andhehadtwohornslikealambandspoke
likeadragon.Andheexercisesalltheauthorityofthefirstbeastinhispresence,andcausestheearthandthosewhodwellinittoworshipthefirstbeast,whosedeadlywoundwashealed.Heperformsgreatsigns,sothatheevenmakesfirecomedownfromheavenontheearthinthesightofmen.Andhedeceivesthosewhodwellontheearthbythosesignswhichhewasgrantedtodointhesightofthebeast,tellingthosewhodwellontheearthtomakeanimagetothebeastwhowaswoundedbytheswordandlived.Hewasgrantedpowertogivebreathtotheimageofthebeast,thattheimageofthebeastshouldbothspeakandcauseasmanyaswouldnotworshiptheimageofthebeasttobekilled.Andhecausesall,bothsmallandgreat,richandpoor,freeandslave,toreceiveamarkontheirrighthandorontheirforeheads,andthatnoonemaybuyorsellexceptonewhohasthemarkorthenameofthebeast,orthenumberofhisname.Hereiswisdom.Lethimwhohasunderstandingcalculatethenumberofthebeast,foritisthenumberofaman:hisnumberis666.ThenIlooked,andbehold,aLambstandingonMountZion,andwithhimonehundredandforty-
fourthousand,havinghisFather’snamewrittenontheirforeheads...(Rev.13:1–14:1).
Perhapsnobiblicalriddlehasgrippedandfascinatedpeoplemorethanthis:whoisthebeastidentifiedbythedreadedcryptogram666?Thisriddlehasfueledendlessspeculationthroughoutchurchhistory,resultinginaplethoraofcandidates.Thisperson’snumberisreferredtoas“themarkofthebeast.”
Table8.1TheAntichrist
Author Description Reference
John AsyouhaveheardthattheAntichristiscoming,evennowmanyantichristshavecome,bywhichweknowthatitisthelasthour.
1John2:18
John EveryspiritthatdoesnotconfessthatJesusChristhascomeinthefleshisnotofGod.AndthisisthespiritoftheAntichrist,whichyouhaveheardwascoming,andisnowalreadyintheworld.
1John4:1–4
Paul Thatdaywillnotcomeunlessthefallingwaycomesfirst,andthemanofsinisrevealed,thesonofperdition,whoopposesandexaltshimselfaboveallthatiscalledGod.
2Thess.2:3–4
Paul Thenthelawlessonewillberevealed....ThecomingofthelawlessoneisaccordingtotheworkingofSatan,withallpower,signs,andlyingwonders.
2Thess.2:8–9
John Isawabeastrisingupoutofthesea,havingsevenheadsandtenhorns. Rev.13:1
John Theyworshipedthebeast,saying,“Whoislikethebeast?”...Andhewasgivenamouthspeakinggreatthingsandblasphemies.
Rev.13:4–5
John Authoritywasgiven[thebeast]overeverytribe,tongue,andnation.Andallwhodwellontheearthwillworshiphim,whosenameshavenotbeenwrittenintheBookofLife.
Rev.13:7
As“bestial”asthisfigureis,heisclearlyidentifiedasahumanbeing.“Ingeneral,moreattentionisgiventothe‘riddle’ofthisnumberthantothefactthatitis‘ahumannumber,’”Berkouwersays.“Inotherwords,thatallthesubhumanityofthebeastisstillhuman,proceedingfromamongmen,andsettingitselfupoveragainstGodandmen.”9KennethL.GentryJr.,whohaswrittenextensivelyregardingthedatingofthe
bookofRevelation,10hasalsowrittenanentiremonographconcerningtheidentityofthebeast.11GentryconcurswithBerkouwerthatthebeastwhosenumberis666isaman,whichexcludesdemonicbeings,philosophicalsystems,politicalmovementsorempires,oranythingotherthanaspecific,individual,humanperson.EvenacursoryreadingofRevelation13makesitclearthat,liketheantichrist
andthemanoflawlessness,thebeastisanextremelyevilandidolatrousperson.Gentryaddsthat,sincethebeastpossessesgreat“authority”(Rev.13:5,7)andwearstencrownsonhishead(Rev.13:1),hemustbeapoliticalfigure.(This,ofcourse,doesnotprecludeareligiousfigurewho,inadditiontohisecclesiasticalauthority,isalsoinvestedwithpoliticalauthority.Theideaofseparatingcivilandecclesiasticalauthorityhasnotbeenaconsistentnormthroughouthistory.)Gentryalsoarguesthatthe“name-number”(Rev.13:18)mustspeakofsomeonewhowasacontemporaryofJohn’s.Gentrybasesthisprimarilyonthetime-framereferencesintheApocalypse(whichwehavealreadyexamined).“Thisprinciplealone,”Gentrysays,“willeliminate99.9percentofthesuggestionsbycommentators.”12IfthebeastisoneofJohn’scontemporaries,Gentryargues,thenitnaturally
followsthatitissomeonerelevanttotherecipientsofJohn’sletter.Thisfurtherlimitsthecandidatesforthebeast.GentryagreeswiththosecommentatorswhoaffirmthatJohn’sportraitofthe
beastshiftsbetweengenericandspecificimagery.TheBeastisdescribedashavingsevenheads(Rev.13:1),whichindicatesacollectiveidentitysuchasakingdomorempire.Yetinthissamecontextthebeastisgivenaspecificidentityassociatedwiththecrypticnumber666(Rev.13:18).GentrypointsoutthatlaterinRevelationthesevenheadsaresaidtorepresent
sevenmountains(Rev.17:9):Hereisthemindwhichhaswisdom:Thesevenheadsaresevenmountainsonwhichthewomansits.Therearealsosevenkings.Fivehavefallen,oneis,andtheotherhasnotyetcome.Andwhenhecomes,hemustcontinueashorttime.Andthebeastthatwas,andisnot,ishimselfalsotheeighth,andisoftheseven,andisgoingtoperdition.Andthetenhornswhichyousawaretenkingswhohavereceivednokingdomasyet,buttheyreceive
authorityforonehouraskingswiththebeast.Theseareofonemind,andtheywillgivetheirpowerandauthoritytothebeast(Rev.17:9–13).
Somehavearguedthattheseven-hilledcityisJerusalem,identifiedwithBabylonbecauseofitsspiritualharlotry.Themajorityofcommentators,however,seethisasareferencetoRome,knownwidelyasthe“CityonSevenHills”or,asitwascalledinantiquity,theSeptimontium.
AFirst-CenturyCandidateWiththisbackgroundinmind,GentryconcludesthatthebeastisLuciusDomitiusAhenobarbus,morecommonlyknownbyhisadoptivename,Nero.13
GentrygivesasynopsisofNero’sviolence-studdedlife,includingthemurdersofhisownfamilymembers,thecastrationofaboyNero“married,”andthebrutalmurderofhispregnantwifebykickinghertodeath.BizarrebehaviorwasnotedbythehistorianSuetonius,whowrotethatNeroeven“devisedakindofgame,inwhich,coveredwiththeskinofsomewildanimal,hewasletloosefromacageandattackedtheprivatepartsofmenandwomen,whowereboundtostakes.”14NerobeganhisreignasemperorinAD54.Hisimperialpersecutionofthe
ChristiancommunitywaslaunchedinAD64,thesameyearasthefamousfirethatmanybelievewassetbyNerohimself.ItisoftenassumedthatthepersecutionofChristians,whomNeroblamedforthefire,wasadiversionarytactictoshiftblameforhisownactionstoothers.NerocommittedsuicideinAD68,whenhewasbut31yearsofage.Sincethebeast’sappearanceisoneofthe“thingswhichmustshortlytake
place”(Rev.1:1),Neroisatleastaprimafaciecandidatefortheroleofthebeast.Asdescribedbyancienthistorians,Neroisasingularlycruelandunrestrainedmanofevil.ManyancientwriterscitethebestialcharacterofNero,andGentrysummarizesthesereferences:Tacitus...spokeofNero’s“cruelnature”that“puttodeathsomanyinnocentmen.”RomannaturalistPlinytheElder...describedNeroas“thedestroyerofthehumanrace”and“thepoisonoftheworld.”RomansatiristJuvenal...speaksof“Nero’scruelandbloodytyranny.”...ApolloniusofTyana...specificallymentionsthatNerowascalleda“beast”:“Inmytravels,whichhavebeenwiderthanevermanyetaccomplished,Ihaveseenmany,manywildbeastsofArabiaandIndia;butthis
beast,thatiscommonlycalledaTyrant,Iknownothowmanyheadsithas,norifitbecrookedofclaw,andarmedwithhorriblefangs....Andofwildbeastsyoucannotsaythattheywereeverknowntoeattheirownmother,butNerohasgorgedhimselfonthisdiet.”15
InhismanifestlydepravedcharacterNerofulfilledtheportraitofthebeastwell.ThemostcriticalquestionconcerningNero,however,ishisrelationtothenumber666.Intheancientworldalphabetsoftendiddoubledutyasasystemofnumbering.WeareawarethatRomanletterssuchasX,C,M,andLalsofunctionedasnumbers.Gentrynotesthatnumerical“cryptograms”werefairlycommoninantiquity.“AmongtheGreeks,”hewrites,“itwascalledisopsephia(‘numericalequality’);amongtheJewsitwascalledgimatriya(‘mathematical’).Anygivennamecouldbereducedtoitsnumericalequivalentbyaddingupthemathematicalvalueofallofthelettersofthename.”16“AHebrewspellingof[Nero’s]namewasNrwnQsr(pronounced:Neron
Kaiser),”saysGentry.“IthasbeendocumentedbyarchaeologicalfindsthatafirstcenturyHebrewspellingofNero’snameprovidesuswithpreciselythevalueof666.[Marcus]Jastrow’slexiconoftheTalmudcontainsthisveryspelling....Agreatnumberofbiblicalscholarsrecognizethisnameasthesolutiontotheproblem.Isitnotremarkablethatthismostrelevantemperorhasanamethatfitspreciselytherequiredsum?”17
Table8.2Nero’sNumber
ThenumericalequivalentofoneHebrewrenderingofNero’sname,NrwnQsr(pronouncedNeronKaiser),is666.
Hebrewletter Numericalvalue
N נ 50
r ר 200
w ו 6
n נ 50
Q ק 100
s ם 60
r ר 200
TOTAL 666
OnefascinatingaspectofthiscryptogramisthatatextualvariantinRevelation13:18reads616ratherthan666.Textualanalystsaskifthisvariationwastheresultofacopyist’serrororanintentionalchangetoaccommodatereadersoutsidethescopeofRevelation’sinitialHebrewaudience.ThehighlyrespectedtextualscholarBruceM.Metzgersays:“Perhapsthechangewasintentional,seeingthattheGreekformNeronCaesarwritteninHebrewcharacters(nrwnqsr)isequivalentto666,whereastheLatinformNeroCaesar(nrwqsr)isequivalentto616.”18Itiswelldocumentedthatemperorworshipwaspracticedinfirst-century
Rome.InAD55astatueofNerowaserectedinRome’sTempleofMars.“ThatNeroactuallywasworshipedisevidentfrominscriptionsfoundinEphesusinwhichheiscalled‘AlmightyGod’and‘Savior,’”Gentrynotes.“ReferencetoNeroas‘GodandSavior’isfoundinaninscriptionatSalamis,Cyprus....Regardingtheimperialdevelopmentoftheemperorcult,Caligula(Gaius)andNero‘abandonedallreserve’inpromotingemperorworship.Infact,‘CaligulaandNero,theonlytwooftheJulio-ClaudianswhoweredirectdescendantsofAugustus,demandeddivinehonorswhiletheywerestillalive.’”19Whatshouldwemakeofthis?ManyscholarsviewthebeastinRevelationas
aprophecyofastillremotefuture.OthersseeNeroasa“type”ofonewhohasyettobemademanifest.Oftenthecommentator’sdecisionisgovernedbyhisviewofwhenRevelationwaswritten.EvenifGentryhasdatedRevelationcorrectly,thatstilldoesnotexcludethepossibilityofafuturemanifestationofthebeastinaccordwithaprimaryandsecondaryschemaofpropheticfulfillment.ButissuchaschemanecessaryiftheeventsforetoldinRevelationconcernedtheimminentjudgmentoftheJewishnationandthedestructionofJerusalem?
9WHENISTHEMILLENNIUM?
IsawthesoulsofthosewhohadbeenbeheadedfortheirwitnesstoJesus....AndtheylivedandreignedwithChristforathousandyears.
Revelation20:4
AshortpassageinthebookofRevelationhasbeenthesubjectofvasteschatologicalinvestigation.Itisthepassagethatspeaksofa“millennium.”Wholesystemsofeschatologicalthoughthavebeenlabeledandidentifiedinaccordancewiththeplacethemillenniumholdswithineachsystem.Eschatologicalviewshavebeencategorizedbroadlyintothefollowingschoolsofthought:historicpremillennialism,dispensationalpremillennialism,amillennialism,postmillennialism,andfullpreterism(orrealizedeschatology).Whatfollowsisabriefexplorationofthemaintenetsofthesevariouseschatologicalpositions,particularlywithreferencetothequestionsraisedbyfullandpartialpreterism.ThetextatthecenterofthemillenniumdebateisRevelation20:1–8:
ThenIsawanangelcomingdownfromheaven,havingthekeytothebottomlesspitandagreatchaininhishand.Helaidholdofthedragon,thatserpentofold,whoistheDevilandSatan,andboundhimforathousandyears;andhecasthimintothebottomlesspit,andshuthimup,andsetasealonhim,sothatheshoulddeceivethenationsnomoretillthethousandyearswerefinished.Butafterthesethingshemustbereleasedforalittlewhile.AndIsawthrones,andtheysatonthem,andjudgmentwascommittedtothem.AndIsawthesouls
ofthosewhohadbeenbeheadedfortheirwitnesstoJesusandforthewordofGod,whohadnotworshipedthebeastorhisimage,andhadnotreceivedhismarkontheirforeheadsorontheirhands.AndtheylivedandreignedwithChristforathousandyears.Buttherestofthedeaddidnotliveagainuntilthethousandyearswerefinished.Thisisthefirstresurrection.Blessedandholyishewhohaspartinthefirstresurrection.Oversuchtheseconddeathhasnopower,buttheyshallbepriestsofGodandofChrist,andshallreignwithhimathousandyears.
Nowwhenthethousandyearshaveexpired,Satanwillbereleasedfromhisprisonandwillgoouttodeceivethenationswhichareinthefourcornersoftheearth,GogandMagog,togatherthemtogethertobattle,whosenumberisasthesandofthesea...(Rev.20:1–8).
Thestandardmillennialpositions(eachbeingasystemofeschatologyinitsownright)maybesummarizedbrieflyasfollows:
1. Premillennialismteachesthattherewillbeafuture,literal,earthlymillennialkingdom,andthatitwillbeginwhenChristreturns.Thepre-indicatesthatChristwillreturnbeforethemillennialkingdomisestablished.
2. Amillennialismteachesthattherewillbenoliteralmillennialkingdom.Theprefixa-indicatesasimplenegation.
3. PostmillennialismteachesthatChristwillreturnafter(post-)themillennialkingdomconcludes.
Thesesimpledesignationsofpre-,a-,andpost-helptoestablishthechronologicalrelationshipbetweenthemillennialkingdomandChrist’sreturn.Butinthemselvestheyfailtocapturethefullmeasureofthealternatepositions.Whatisinviewisnotsimplychronology,butthenatureofthekingdomofGod.Thesepositionsalsodifferintheirunderstandingofhistory,whetheritbeoptimisticorpessimistic,andintheirviewsofthechurch’sstrategyinfulfillinghermission.Thereforemoredetailregardingthesevariouspositionsisnecessary.
Amillennialism
ThoughReformedtheologyisbynomeansmonolithicregardingeschatologicalsystems,themajorityreportamongReformedthinkerstendstobeamillennialism.AnthonyA.Hoekemadescribestheamillennialposition:
AmillennialistsinterpretthemillenniummentionedinRevelation20:4–6asdescribingthepresentreignofthesoulsofdeceasedbelieverswithChristinheaven.TheyunderstandthebindingofSatanmentionedinthefirstthreeversesofthischapterasbeingineffectduringtheentireperiodbetweenthefirstandsecondcomingsofChrist....AmillennialistsfurtherholdthatthekingdomofGodisnowpresentintheworldasthevictorious
ChristisrulinghispeoplebyhisWordandSpirit,thoughtheyalsolookforwardtoafuture,glorious,andperfectkingdomonthenewearthinthelifetocome...thekingdomofevilwillcontinuetoexistalongsideofthekingdomofGoduntiltheendoftheworld....Theso-called“signsofthetimes”havebeenpresentintheworldfromthetimeofChrist’sfirstcoming,buttheywillcometoamoreintensified,finalmanifestationjustbeforehisSecondComing.Theamillennialistthereforeexpectsthe
bringingofthegospeltoallnationsandtheconversionofthefullnessofIsraeltobecompletedbeforeChrist’sreturn.HealsolooksforanintensifiedformoftribulationandapostasyaswellasfortheappearanceofapersonalantichristbeforetheSecondComing.1
KennethL.GentryJr.citesthefollowingfeaturesofamillennialism:
1. ThechurchageisthekingdomeraprophesiedintheOldTestament,astheNewTestamentchurchbecomestheIsraelofGod.
2. SatanwasboundduringJesus’searthlyministry,restraininghimwhilethegospelisbeingpreachedintheworld.
3. InsofarasChristpresentlyrulesintheheartsofbelievers,theywillhavesomeinfluenceonculturewhilelivingouttheirfaith.
4. Towardtheendevil’sgrowthwillaccelerate,culminatinginthegreattribulationandapersonalantichrist.
5. “Christwillreturntoendhistory,resurrectandjudgeallmen,andestablishtheeternalorder.Theeternaldestinyoftheredeemedmaybeeitherinheavenorinatotallyrenovatednewearth.”2
DispensationalPremillennialism
Dispensationalism,arelativelyrecenteschatologicalsystem,firstappearedintheearlynineteenthcenturyinEngland.Ithassweptacrossthemodernworld,duelargelytothewideinfluenceofTheScofieldReferenceBible,publishedin1909.DispensationalismhasbecomeinourdaythemajorityreportamongevangelicalChristians.CharlesCaldwellRyriegivesthefollowingsynopsisofdispensational
premillennialism:
PremillennialistsbelievethattheirsisthehistoricfaithoftheChurch.HoldingtoaliteralinterpretationoftheScriptures,theybelievethatthepromisesmadetoAbrahamandDavidareunconditionalandhavehadorwillhavealiteralfulfillment.InnosensehavethesepromisesmadetoIsraelbeenabrogatedorfulfilledbytheChurch,whichisadistinctbodyinthisagehavingpromisesandadestinydifferentfromIsrael’s.Atthecloseofthisage,premillennialistsbelievethatChristwillreturnforhisChurch,meetingherintheair(thisisnottheSecondComingofChrist),whichevent,calledtheraptureortranslation,willusherinaseven-yearperiodoftribulationontheearth.Afterthis,theLordwillreturntotheearth(thisistheSecondComingofChrist)toestablishhiskingdomontheearthforathousandyears,duringwhichtimethepromisestoIsraelwillbefulfilled.3
Gentrysummarizesthekeytenetsofdispensationalpremillennialism:
1. ChristofferedtotheJewstheDavidickingdominthefirstcentury.Theyrejectedit,anditwaspostponeduntilthefuture.
2. Thecurrentchurchageisa“parenthesis”unknowntotheOldTestamentprophets.
3. GodhasseparateprogramsforthechurchandIsrael.4. Thechurchwillultimatelyloseinfluenceintheworldandbecome
corruptedorapostatetowardtheendofthechurchage.5. Christwillreturnsecretlytorapturehissaintsbeforethegreat
tribulation.6. AfterthetribulationChristwillreturntoearthtoadministeraJewish
politicalkingdombasedinJerusalemforonethousandyears.Satanwillbebound,andthetemplewillberebuiltandthesacrificialsystemreinstituted.
7. Neartheendofthemillennium,SatanwillbereleasedandChristwillbeattackedatJerusalem.
8. Christwillcalldownjudgmentfromheavenanddestroyhisenemies.The(second)resurrectionandthejudgmentofthewickedwilloccur,initiatingtheeternalorder.4
HistoricPremillennialism
PerhapsthemostnotedadvocateofhistoricpremillennialisminourdayhasbeenGeorgeEldonLadd.LaddhaswrittenextensivelyonthesubjectinsuchworksasATheologyoftheNewTestament,“HistoricPremillennialism,”andTheBlessedHope.5Inthelatterworkheprovidesanimportantcritiqueofpretribulationism(Dispensationalism)andanhistoricalperspectiveondifferencesbetweenDispensationalismandhistoricpremillennialism.
Table9.1AdvocatesofMillennialViews
Amillennialists Postmillennialists
JayE.Adams OswaldT.Allis J.GreshamMachen
G.C.Berkouwer Athanasius GeorgeC.Miladin
LouisBerkhof Augustine IainH.Murray
WilliamHendricksen GregL.Bahnsen JohnMurray
AnthonyA.Hoekema JohnCalvin GaryNorth
AbrahamKuyper RobertLewisDabney JohnOwen
BruceK.Waltke JohnJeffersonDavis R.J.Rushdoony
EdwardJ.Young JonathanEdwards W.G.T.Shedd
Eusebius AugustusH.Strong
A.A.Hodge J.H.Thornwell
CharlesHodge B.B.Warfield
J.MarcellusKik
DispensationalPremillennialists
HistoricalPremillennialists
GleasonL.Archer J.DwightPentecost W.J.Erdman
DonaldG.Barnhouse CharlesCaldwellRyrie FredericL.Godet
LewisSperryChafer JohnF.Walvoord Irenaeus
J.N.Darby JustinMartyr
M.R.DeHaan GeorgeEldonLadd
CharlesL.Feinberg Papias
NormanL.Geisler J.BartonPayne
HarryA.Ironside Tertullian
WalterC.Kaiser R.A.Torrey
HalLindsey TheodorZahn
“TheideaofapretribulationrapturewasnotseenintheScripturesbytheearlychurchfathers,”Laddargues.“Theywerefuturistsandpremillennialistsbutnotpretribulationists.ThisofitselfindicatesthatpretribulationismandpremillennialismarenotidenticalandthattheBlessedHopeisnotthehopeofarapturebeforetheTribulation.PretribulationismwasanunknownteachinguntiltheriseofthePlymouthBrethrenamongwhomthedoctrineoriginated....ThevocabularyoftheBlessedHopeknowsnothingoftwoaspectsofChrist’scoming,onesecretandoneglorious.”6Laddgoesontosay:
Finally,weconcludedthattheundueconcernwiththequestionofpretribulationismtendstocauseneglectofmoreimportantandvitalissueshavingtodowiththeBlessedHope;thatitisnotnecessaryforthepreservationofthepurifyinginfluenceoftheBlessedHope;thatittendstomisunderstandthemostfundamentalelementinthepurifyingHope;thatitsacrificesoneofthegreatestincentivesforworldevangelization;thatabiblicalattitudeofexpectancyisnotidenticalwithabeliefinanany-
momentcomingofChrist;thatitmisrepresentstheBlessedHopebydefiningitintermsofescapefromsufferingratherthanunionwithChristandthusmaybeguiltyofthepositivedangerofleavingtheChurchunpreparedfortribulationwhenAntichristappears;andthatpretribulationismisnotessentialtoapremillennialeschatology.7
Gentryprovidesaseven-pointsummaryofhistoricpremillennialism:
1. TheNewTestamenteraChurchistheinitialphaseofChrist’skingdom,asprophesiedbytheOldTestamentprophets.
2. TheNewTestamentChurchmaywinoccasionalvictoriesinhistory,butultimatelyshewillfailinhermission,loseinfluence,andbecomecorruptedasworldwideevilincreasestowardtheendoftheChurchAge.
3. TheChurchwillpassthroughafuture,worldwide,unprecedentedtimeoftravail.ThiseraisknownastheGreatTribulation,whichwillpunctuatetheendofcontemporaryhistory....
4. ChristwillreturnattheendoftheTribulationtorapturetheChurch,resurrectdeceasedsaints,andconductthejudgmentoftherighteousinthe“twinklingofaneye.”
5. Christwillthendescendtotheearthwithhisglorifiedsaints,fightthebattleofArmageddon,bindSatan,andestablishaworldwide,politicalkingdom,whichwillbepersonallyadministeredbyhimfor1,000yearsfromJerusalem.
6. Attheendofthemillennialreign,SatanwillbeloosedandamassiverebellionagainstthekingdomandafierceassaultagainstChristandhissaintswilloccur.
7. GodwillintervenewithfieryjudgmenttorescueChristandthesaints.Theresurrectionandthejudgmentofthewickedwilloccurandtheeternalorderwillbegin.8
Postmillennialism
Anadvocateofcontemporarypostmillennialism,Gentrypresentsseveralfeaturesofthisview.ThefirstisthatthemessianickingdomwasfoundedonearthduringtheearthlyministryofChristinfulfillmentofOldTestamentprophecy.TheNewTestamentchurchbecomesthetransformedIsrael,the“IsraelofGod”ofwhichPaulspeaksinGalatians6:16.
Thesecondfeatureisthatthekingdomisessentiallyredemptiveandspiritualratherthanpoliticalandphysical.Thethirdfeatureisthatthekingdomwillexerciseatransformationalsocio-
culturalinfluenceinhistory.GentryquotesGregL.Bahnsen:“Theessentialdistinctiveofpostmillennialismisitsscripturallyderived,sureexpectationofgospelprosperityforthechurchduringthepresentage.”9ThefourthfeatureisthatthekingdomofChristwillgraduallyexpandintime
andonearth.ThiswillbeaccomplishednotwithoutChrist’sroyalpowerasKingbutwithouthisphysicalpresenceonearth.ThefifthfeatureisthattheGreatCommissionwillsucceed.Gentrycites
Bahnsen:“Thethingthatdistinguishesthebiblicalpostmillennialist,then,fromamillennialistsandpremillennialistsishisbeliefthattheScriptureteachesthesuccessofthegreatcommissioninthisageofthechurch.”10ThisexpectationincludesthevirtualChristianizationofthenations.Atthispointinhissummary,Gentrymakesanimportantdistinctionbetween
twotypesorgroupsofmodernpostmillennialists:pietisticpostmillennialistsandtheonomicpostmillennialists.Thebasicdifferencebetweenthetwohastodowiththeapplicationofbiblicallaw.“Pietisticpostmillennialism(asfoundinBannerofTruthcircles),”Gentrysays,“deniesthatthepostmillennialadvanceofthekingdominvolvesthetotaltransformationofculturethroughtheapplicationofbiblicallaw.Theonomicpostmillennialismaffirmsthis.”11Theseventhfeatureisthatanextendedperiodofspiritualprosperitymay
endureformillennia,afterwhichhistorywillbedrawntoaclosebythepersonal,visible,bodilyreturnofChrist.Hisreturnwillbeaccompaniedbyaliteralresurrectionandageneraljudgment,usheringinthefinalandeternalformofthekingdom.
OtherDifferences
Thedifferencesdisplayedamongthevariousmillennialschoolsgofarbeyondtheirunderstandingofthemillenniumitself.Thedifferencesaresystemicandextendtoeveryaspectofeschatology.Someformofpreterismcouldconceivablybeincorporatedintoallofthem.OnepossibleexceptionisDispensationalism,althoughwithcertainmodificationsitcouldfitineventhere.Partialpreterismmaybeincorporatedinbothpietisticpostmillennialismand
theonomicpostmillennialism.Oneneednotbeinthetheonomiccamptoembracepartialpreterism.ThetermtheonomicreferstoaspecificschoolofthoughtwithincontemporaryCalvinism,toaspecificviewoftheOldTestament
lawanditsapplicationtocontemporaryculture.InabroadsenseallCalvinistsare“theonomic,”andinanevenbroadersenseallChristiansaretheonomic.Therootmeaningoftheonomyis“rulebythelawofGod.”EveryChristian
must,insomesense,agreethatGod’sruleissupremeovercreation.ButbynomeansdoallChristiansagreewithhistoricCalvinismthattheOldTestamentlawhasanongoingfunctionintheChristianlife.OfCalvin’sfamousthree-folduseofthelaw,thethirdisstillhotlydisputedamongevangelicals.Indenyingthe“thirduse”ofthelaw,thetertiususus,manyevangelicals,especiallythosewithintheDispensationalcamp,categoricallydenytheonomy.TheviewthattheOldTestamentlawisnotbindingonthebelieverinany
sense,aviewcalledantinomianism,iswidelyheld.TheproblemofantinomianismisaseriousthreattocontemporaryChristianity.OveragainstthisviewallCalvinistsstandtogetherinassertingtheongoingrelevanceanduseoftheOldTestament’smorallaw.ThedebateovertheonomyinitsnarrowsenseisanintramuraldebateamongCalvinists,whoagreeonmoreregardingtheOldTestamentlawthantheydisagreeon.Buttheonomyinthenarrowsenseisnot,asGentryhasindicated,essentialtopostmillennialism.Anothermajordifferencebetweenmillennialschoolsistheirattitudestoward
thefuture.Postmillennialismisthemostoptimisticconcerningthegospel’simpactonhistoryandculture.Whenonesurveyshistoryattheendofthetwentiethcentury,itmayseemsomewhatPollyannaishtoregardthechurch’sinfluenceintheworldwithmuchoptimism.Thisisespeciallytrueinlightofthefrequentassertionbysociologistsandhistoriansthatthisisthe“post-Christianera.”Theonlypost-ChristianeraknowntoScriptureiseternity,whichmaybe“post”withrespecttoanyspecificerainchurchhistory,butwillcertainlynotbeChristian.ThefuturebelongstothepeopleofGodandtothekingdomofChrist.SomeCalvinistsmaybepessimisticwithregardtotheimmediatefutureandevenwithregardtothegospel’simpactonculturebeforeChristcomesagain,butonecannotbeaCalvinistandapessimistabouttheultimatetriumphofChristandthegospel.
Conclusion
ThepurposeofTheLastDaysaccordingtoJesushasbeentoexamineandevaluatethevariousclaimsofpreterism,bothfullandpartial.Thegreatservicepreterismperformsistofocusattentionontwomajorissues.Thefirstisthetime-framereferencesoftheNewTestamentregardingeschatologicalprophecy.
Thepreteristisasentinelstandingguardagainstfrivolousandsuperficialattemptstodownplayorexplainawaytheforceofthesereferences.ThesecondmajorissueisthedestructionofJerusalem.Thiseventcertainly
spelledtheendofacrucialredemptive-historicalepoch.Itmustbeviewedastheendofsomeage.ItalsorepresentsasignificantvisitationoftheLordinjudgmentandavitallyimportant“dayoftheLord.”WhetherthiswastheonlydayoftheLordaboutwhichScripturespeaksremainsamajorpointofcontroversyamongpreterists.Thegreatweaknessoffullpreterism—andwhatIregardtobeitsfatalflaw—
isitstreatmentofthefinalresurrection.Iffullpreterismistogainwidecredibilityinourtime,itmustovercomethisobstacle.Withrespecttopartialpreterism,KennethL.GentryJr.hasdoneexcellent
workinforcingreconsiderationofthedatewhenthebookofRevelationwaswritten.IfheiscorrectinarguingforadatepriortoAD70,thensweepingrevisionsmustbemadeinourunderstandingofthisbook’scontentandfocus.DebatesovereschatologywillprobablycontinueuntiltheLordreturnsandwe
havetheadvantageofhindsightratherthanthedisadvantageofforesight.ThedivisionsthatexistwithintheChristiancommunityareunderstandable,consideringthatboththesubjectmatterandtheliterarygenreoffutureprophecyareexceedinglydifficult.ThisdoesnotmeanthatwemaypushtheBibleasideorneglectitseschatologicalsections.Onthecontrarytheinterpretativedifficultiespresentedbyeschatologicalmatterssimplycallustoagreaterdiligenceandpersistenceinseekingtheirsolution.AsIhaveindicatedthroughoutthisbook,oneofmyoverarchingconcerns
regardingthepointsindisputeistheauthorityofScripture.AstheinerrantWordofGod,itprecludesalleffortstoignoreordownplayanyaspectofitsteaching.TheevangelicalworldcannotaffordtoturnadeafeartotherailingvoicesofskepticismthatgutScriptureofitsdivineauthority,thatassaultthecredibilityoftheapostolicwitnessandevenofChristhimself.Wemusttakeseriouslytheskeptics’critiqueofthetime-framereferencesofNewTestamentprophecy,andwemustanswerthemconvincingly.
APPENDIX1THEOLIVETDISCOURSEACCORDING
TOMATTHEW
ThenJesuswentoutanddepartedfromthetemple,andhisdisciplescametohimtoshowhimthebuildingsofthetemple.AndJesussaidtothem,“Doyounotseeallthesethings?Assuredly,Isaytoyou,notonestoneshallbelefthereuponanother,thatshallnotbethrowndown.”NowashesatontheMountofOlives,thedisciplescametohimprivately,
saying,“Tellus,whenwillthesethingsbe?AndwhatwillbethesignofYourcoming,andoftheendoftheage?”AndJesusansweredandsaidtothem:
Takeheedthatnoonedeceivesyou.FormanywillcomeinMyname,saying,“IamtheChrist,”andwilldeceivemany.Andyouwillhearofwarsandrumorsofwars.Seethatyouarenottroubled;forallthesethingsmustcometopass,buttheendisnotyet.Fornationwillriseagainstnation,andkingdomagainstkingdom.Andtherewillbefamines,pestilences,andearthquakesinvariousplaces.Allthesearethebeginningofsorrows.Thentheywilldeliveryouuptotribulationandkillyou,andyouwillbehatedbyallnationsforMy
name’ssake.Andthenmanywillbeoffended,willbetrayoneanother,andwillhateoneanother.Thenmanyfalseprophetswillriseupanddeceivemany.Andbecauselawlessnesswillabound,theloveofmanywillgrowcold.Buthewhoendurestotheendshallbesaved.Andthisgospelofthekingdomwillbepreachedinalltheworldasawitnesstoallthenations,andthentheendwillcome.Thereforewhenyouseethe“abominationofdesolation,”spokenofbyDanieltheprophet,standing
intheholyplace(whoeverreads,lethimunderstand),thenletthosewhoareinJudeafleetothemountains.Lethimwhoisonthehousetopnotcomedowntotakeanythingoutofhishouse.Andlethimwhoisinthefieldnotgobacktogethisclothes.Butwoetothosewhoarepregnantandtothosewithnursingbabiesinthosedays!AndpraythatyourflightmaynotbeinwinterorontheSabbath.Forthentherewillbegreattribulation,suchashasnotbeensincethebeginningoftheworlduntil
thistime,no,norevershallbe.Andunlessthosedayswereshortened,nofleshwouldbesaved;butfortheelect’ssakethosedayswillbeshortened.Thenifanyonesaystoyou,“Look,hereistheChrist!”or“There!”donotbelieveit.Forfalse
christsandfalseprophetswillariseandshowgreatsignsandwonders,soastodeceive,ifpossible,eventheelect.See,Ihavetoldyoubeforehand.Thereforeiftheysaytoyou,“Look,Heisinthe
desert!”donotgoout;or“Look,Heisintheinnerrooms!”donotbelieveit.Forasthelightningcomesfromtheeastandflashestothewest,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe.Forwhereverthecarcassis,theretheeagleswillbegatheredtogether.Immediatelyafterthetribulationofthosedaysthesunwillbedarkened,andthemoonwillnotgive
itslight;thestarswillfallfromheaven,andthepowersoftheheavenswillbeshaken.ThenthesignoftheSonofManwillappearinheaven,andthenallthetribesoftheearthwillmourn,andtheywillseetheSonofMancomingonthecloudsofheavenwithpowerandgreatglory.AndHewillsendHisangelswithagreatsoundofatrumpet,andtheywillgathertogetherHiselectfromthefourwinds,fromoneendofheaventotheother.Nowlearnthisparablefromthefigtree:Whenitsbranchhasalreadybecometenderandputsforth
leaves,youknowthatsummerisnear.Soyoualso,whenyouseeallthesethings,knowthatitisnear,attheverydoors.Assuredly,Isaytoyou,thisgenerationwillbynomeanspassawaytillallthesethingsarefulfilled.Heavenandearthwillpassaway,butMywordswillbynomeanspassaway.Butofthatdayandhournooneknows,no,noteventheangelsofheaven,butMyFatheronly.But
asthedaysofNoahwere,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe.Forasinthedaysbeforetheflood,theywereeatinganddrinking,marryingandgivinginmarriage,untilthedaythatNoahenteredtheark,anddidnotknowuntilthefloodcameandtookthemallaway,soalsowillthecomingoftheSonofManbe.Thentwomenwillbeinthefield:onewillbetakenandtheotherleft.Twowomenwillbegrindingatthemill:onewillbetakenandtheotherleft.Watchtherefore,foryoudonotknowwhathouryourLordiscoming.Butknowthis,thatifthe
masterofthehousehadknownwhathourthethiefwouldcome,hewouldhavewatchedandnotallowedhishousetobebrokeninto.Thereforeyoualsobeready,fortheSonofManiscomingatanhourwhenyoudonotexpectHim.Whothenisafaithfulandwiseservant,whomhismastermaderuleroverhishousehold,togive
themfoodindueseason?Blessedisthatservantwhomhismaster,whenhecomes,willfindsodoing.Assuredly,Isaytoyouthathewillmakehimruleroverallhisgoods.Butifthatevilservantsaysinhisheart,“Mymasterisdelayinghiscoming,”andbeginstobeathis
fellowservants,andtoeatanddrinkwiththedrunkards,themasterofthatservantwillcomeonadaywhenheisnotlookingforhimandatanhourthatheisnotawareof,andwillcuthimintwoandappointhimhisportionwiththehypocrites.Thereshallbeweepingandgnashingofteeth.Thenthekingdomofheavenshallbelikenedtotenvirginswhotooktheirlampsandwentoutto
meetthebridegroom.Nowfiveofthemwerewise,andfivewerefoolish.Thosewhowerefoolishtooktheirlampsandtooknooilwiththem,butthewisetookoilintheirvesselswiththeirlamps.Butwhilethebridegroomwasdelayed,theyallslumberedandslept.Andatmidnightacrywas
heard:“Behold,thebridegroomiscoming;goouttomeethim!”Thenallthosevirginsaroseandtrimmedtheirlamps.Andthefoolishsaidtothewise,“Giveussomeofyouroil,forourlampsaregoingout.”Butthewiseanswered,saying,“No,lestthereshouldnotbeenoughforusandyou;butgoratherto
thosewhosell,andbuyforyourselves.”Andwhiletheywenttobuy,thebridegroomcame,andthosewhowerereadywentinwithhimto
thewedding;andthedoorwasshut.Afterwardtheothervirginscamealso,saying,“Lord,Lord,opentous!”Butheansweredandsaid,“Assuredly,Isaytoyou,Idonotknowyou.”Watchtherefore,foryouknowneitherthedaynorthehourinwhichtheSonofManiscoming.Forthekingdomofheavenislikeamantravelingtoafarcountry,whocalledhisownservantsand
deliveredhisgoodstothem.Andtoonehegavefivetalents,toanothertwo,andtoanotherone,toeachaccordingtohisownability;andimmediatelyhewentonajourney.Thenhewhohadreceivedthefivetalentswentandtradedwiththem,andmadeanotherfivetalents.
Andlikewisehewhohadreceivedtwogainedtwomorealso.Buthewhohadreceivedonewentanddugintheground,andhidhislord’smoney.Afteralongtimethelordofthoseservantscameandsettledaccountswiththem.Sohewhohad
receivedfivetalentscameandbroughtfiveothertalents,saying,“Lord,youdeliveredtomefivetalents;look,Ihavegainedfivemoretalentsbesidesthem.”Hislordsaidtohim,“Welldone,goodandfaithfulservant;youwerefaithfuloverafewthings,I
willmakeyourulerovermanythings.Enterintothejoyofyourlord.”Healsowhohadreceivedtwotalentscameandsaid,“Lord,youdeliveredtometwotalents;look,I
havegainedtwomoretalentsbesidesthem.”Hislordsaidtohim,“Welldone,goodandfaithfulservant;youhavebeenfaithfuloverafew
things,Iwillmakeyourulerovermanythings.Enterintothejoyofyourlord.”Thenhewhohadreceivedtheonetalentcameandsaid,“Lord,Iknewyoutobeahardman,
reapingwhereyouhavenotsown,andgatheringwhereyouhavenotscatteredseed.AndIwasafraid,andwentandhidyourtalentintheground.Look,thereyouhavewhatisyours.”Buthislordansweredandsaidtohim,“Youwickedandlazyservant,youknewthatIreapwhereI
havenotsown,andgatherwhereIhavenotscatteredseed.Thereforeyououghttohavedepositedmymoneywiththebankers,andatmycomingIwouldhavereceivedbackmyownwithinterest.“Thereforetakethetalentfromhim,andgiveittohimwhohastentalents.Fortoeveryonewhohas,
morewillbegiven,andhewillhaveabundance;butfromhimwhodoesnothave,evenwhathehaswillbetakenaway.Andcasttheunprofitableservantintotheouterdarkness.Therewillbeweepingandgnashingofteeth.”WhentheSonofMancomesinHisglory,andalltheholyangelswithHim,thenHewillsitonthe
throneofHisglory.AllthenationswillbegatheredbeforeHim,andHewillseparatethemonefromanother,asashepherddivideshissheepfromthegoats.AndHewillsetthesheeponHisrighthand,butthegoatsontheleft.ThentheKingwillsaytothoseonHisrighthand,“Come,youblessedofmyFather,inheritthe
kingdompreparedforyoufromthefoundationoftheworld:forIwashungryandyougaveMefood;IwasthirstyandyougaveMedrink;IwasastrangerandyoutookMein;IwasnakedandyouclothedMe;IwassickandyouvisitedMe;IwasinprisonandyoucametoMe.”ThentherighteouswillanswerHim,saying,“Lord,whendidweseeYouhungryandfeedYou,or
thirstyandgiveYoudrink?WhendidweseeYouastrangerandtakeYouin,ornakedandclotheYou?OrwhendidweseeYousick,orinprison,andcometoYou?”AndtheKingwillanswerandsaytothem,“Assuredly,Isaytoyou,inasmuchasyoudidittoone
oftheleastoftheseMybrethren,youdidittoMe.”ThenHewillalsosaytothoseonthelefthand,“DepartfromMe,youcursed,intotheeverlasting
firepreparedforthedevilandhisangels:forIwashungryandyougaveMenofood;IwasthirstyandyougaveMenodrink;IwasastrangerandyoudidnottakeMein,nakedandyoudidnotclotheMe,sickandinprisonandyoudidnotvisitMe.”ThentheyalsowillanswerHim,saying,“Lord,whendidweseeYouhungryorthirstyorastranger
ornakedorsickorinprison,anddidnotministertoYou?”ThenHewillanswerthem,saying,“Assuredly,Isaytoyou,inasmuchasyoudidnotdoittooneof
theleastofthese,youdidnotdoittoMe.”Andthesewillgoawayintoeverlastingpunishment,buttherighteousintoeternallife(Matt.24:1–
25:46).
APPENDIX2
THEOLIVETDISCOURSEINMATTHEW,MARK,ANDLUKE
NOTES
Introduction1.BertrandRussell,WhyIAmNotaChristian:AndOtherEssaysonReligionandRelatedSubjects,ed.
PaulEdwards(London:Allen&Unwin/NewYork:Simon&Schuster,1957),vi.2.Ibid.,vi.3.Ibid.,16.4.Ibid.5.Ibid.,16–17.6.AdolfHarnack,WhatIsChristianity?LecturesDeliveredintheUniversityofBerlinduringtheWinter-
Term1899–1900,trans.ThomasBaileySaunders,2ded.(1901;reprint,NewYork:Harper&Row,1957).7.AlbertSchweitzer,TheQuestoftheHistoricalJesus:ACriticalStudyofItsProgressfromReimarus
toWrede,trans.W.Montgomery(1910;reprint,NewYork:Macmillan,1956).8.HermanRidderbos,TheComingoftheKingdom,trans.H.deJongste,ed.RaymondO.Zorn
(Philadelphia:PresbyterianandReformed,1962),xiii.SeeJohannesWeiss,DiePredigtJesuvomReicheGottes(1892);Englishtrans.,Jesus’sProclamationoftheKingdomofGod,ed.andtrans.RichardHydeHiersandDavidLarrimoreHolland,LivesofJesusSeries,ed.LeanderE.Keck(Philadelphia:Fortress,1971).9.C.H.Dodd,TheParablesoftheKingdom(London:Nisbet,1935).10.C.H.Dodd,TheInterpretationoftheFourthGospel(London:CambridgeUniversity,1953),7.11.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing(London:Daldy,Isbister,1878).Newed.(London:Unwin,1887).Reprintofnewed.:TheParousia:AStudyoftheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’sSecondComing(GrandRapids:Baker,1983).12.Ibid.,539–40.
Chapter1WhatDidJesusTeachonMountOlivet?1.WilliamL.Lane,TheGospelaccordingtoMark,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNew
Testament(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1974),444.2.VincentTaylor,TheGospelaccordingtoSt.Mark:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Notes,and
Indexes,2ded.(1966;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1981),498.3.JohnCalvin,CommentaryonaHarmonyoftheEvangelists,Matthew,Mark,andLuke,trans.William
Pringle,vol.3(reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1984),117.4.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),57.5.Ibid.,58.6.Ibid.,69.RussellcitesasthesourceofthequotationfromJosephushisTheAntiquitiesoftheJews,
20.8.5–6.Whistontranslatesthefirstsentenceofparagraph5asfollows:“...thecountrywasagainfilledwithrobbersandimposters,whodeludedthemultitude.”Russell’sversionaccuratelysummarizes
paragraphs5–6.SeeFlaviusJosephus,TheAntiquitiesoftheJews,inTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus,trans.WilliamWhiston,vol.4(reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1974),133(20.8.5–6).7.Calvin,CommentaryonaHarmony,3:120–21.8.Russell,TheParousia,69–70.9.W.F.AlbrightandC.S.Mann,Matthew:Introduction,Translation,andNotes,AnchorBible,ed.
W.F.AlbrightandDavidNoelFreedman(GardenCity:Doubleday,1971),292.10.Lane,TheGospelaccordingtoMark,458.11.Russell,TheParousia,70–71.12.Ibid.,71.13.Ibid.,72–73.14.Ibid.,73.SeeJosephus,AntiquitiesoftheJews,20(18.5.3).15.AlbrightandMann,Matthew,295.16.Calvin,CommentaryonaHarmony,3:131–32.17.Russell,TheParousia,75–76.Whiston’stranslationofthepassagefromJosephus:“Nordidanyone
ofthemescapewithhislife.Afalseprophetwastheoccasionofthesepeople’sdestruction,whohadmadeapublicproclamationinthecitythatveryday,thatGodcommandedthemtogetupuponthetemple,andthattheretheyshouldreceivemiraculoussignsoftheirdeliverance.”FlaviusJosephus,TheWarsoftheJews,inTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus,trans.WilliamWhiston,vol.1(reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1974),453(6.5.2).18.Russell,TheParousia,77.JohnPeterLange,TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew,trans.PhilipSchaff,
CommentaryontheHolyScriptures,ed.JohnPeterLange(1866;reprint,GrandRapids:Zondervan1960),428;GeorgeCampbell,TheFourGospelsTranslatedfromtheGreek:WithPreliminaryDissertations,andNotesCriticalandExplanatory(Philadelphia:Bartram,1799);andMosesStuart[Russelldoesnotspecifythework].19.Calvin,CommentaryonaHarmony,3:146.20.A.W.Argyle,TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew,CambridgeBibleCommentary,ed.P.R.Ackroyd,
A.R.C.Leaney,andJ.W.Packer(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity,1963),185.21.Russell,TheParousia,79.22.Ibid.,80.EmphasisisRussell’s.23.Ibid.EmphasisisRussell’s.24.Calvin,CommentaryonaHarmony,3:146.25.Russell,TheParousia,81–82.26.Ibid.,147.27.Ibid.,83–84.28.GaryDeMar,LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn
(Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991),122.
Chapter2What“Generation”WillWitnesstheEnd?1.DavidHill,TheGospelofMatthew,NewCenturyBibleCommentary,ed.RonaldE.Clementsand
MatthewBlack(London:Marshall,Morgan&Scott/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1972),323.2.WilliamL.Lane,TheGospelaccordingtoMark,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNew
Testament(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1974),314.SeeJ.Schierse,“HistorischeKritikundtheologischeExegesedersynoptischenEvangelienerläutertanMk.9:1,”Scholastik29(1959):520–36.3.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),29–30.4.Ibid.,26–27.5.Ibid.,84–85.6.GaryDeMar,LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn
(Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991),32.
7.HermanRidderbos,TheComingoftheKingdom,trans.H.deJongste,ed.RaymondO.Zorn(Philadelphia:PresbyterianandReformed,1962),501–2.8.DeMar,LastDaysMadness,33–34.ThesecondparagraphisfromA.J.MattillJr.,LukeandtheLast
Things:APerspectivefortheUnderstandingofLukanThought(Dillsboro,NC:WesternNorthCarolina,1979),100.9.DeMar,LastDaysMadness,34.DavidChilton,TheGreatTribulation(FortWorth:Dominion,1987),
3.EmphasisisChilton’s.10.Russell,TheParousia,85.11.Ibid.,85–87.JohnPeterLange,TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew,trans.PhilipSchaff,Commentary
ontheHolyScriptures,ed.JohnPeterLange(1866;reprint,GrandRapids:Zondervan,1960),208;RudolfStier,TheWordsoftheLordJesus,vol.1,OurLord’sFirstWords,andtheGospelsofMatthew,Mark,andLukeSpecially,trans.WilliamB.Pope,rev.JamesStrongandHenryB.Smith(NewYork:Tibbals,1864),207.12.Russell,TheParousia,87.13.FriedrichBüchsel,“Genea,”TheologicalDictionaryoftheNewTestament,ed.GerhardKittel,trans.
anded.GeoffreyW.Bromiley,vol.1(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1964),663.14.Ibid.15.Lane,TheGospelaccordingtoMark,480.16.Ridderbos,TheComingoftheKingdom,499.SeeSeakleGreijdanus,HetheiligEvangelienaarde
beschrijvingvanLucas,2vols.,KommentaarophetNieuweTestament,ed.SeakleGreijdanus,F.W.Grosheide,andJ.A.C.vanLeeuwen(Amsterdam:VanBottenburg,1940–41),2:1004.17.Ridderbos,TheComingoftheKingdom,500.18.Russell,TheParousia,54–56.
Chapter3What“Age”WasabouttoEnd?1.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),23.2.HobartE.Freeman,AnIntroductiontotheOldTestamentProphets(Chicago:Moody,1968),145–46.3.Ibid.,146.4.BruceVawter,TheConscienceofIsrael:Pre-exilicProphetsandProphecy(NewYork:Sheed&
Ward,1961),94–95.5.Russell,TheParousia,4.6.I.HowardMarshall,TheGospelofLuke:ACommentaryontheGreekText,NewInternationalGreek
TestamentCommentary(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1978),717,719.7.Russell,TheParousia,39.8.AugustusNeander,TheLifeofJesusChristinItsHistoricalConnexionandHistoricalDevelopement,
3ded.,trans.JohnMcClintockandCharlesE.Blumenthal(NewYork:Harper,1849),349(§239).QuotedinRussell,TheParousia,41.9.GaryDeMar,LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn
(Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991),21–23.10.Russell,TheParousia,197–98.Inafootnotetothesentencebeginning“Itissometimessaid...,”
Russellcitestwosources:(1)JohnPeterLange,TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew,trans.PhilipSchaff,CommentaryontheHolyScriptures,ed.JohnPeterLange(1866;reprint,GrandRapids:Zondervan,1960),422;and(2)HenryAlford,TheGreekTestament:WithaCriticallyRevisedText,aDigestofVariousReadings,MarginalReferencestoVerbalandIdiomaticUsage,Prolegomena,andaCriticalandExegeticalCommentary,4thed.,4vols.(London:Rivingtons,1859–61),2:556.
Chapter4WhatDidPaulTeachinHisLetters?
1.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’sSecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),161.2.JohnCalvin,TheEpistlesofPaultheApostletotheRomansandtotheThessalonians,trans.Ross
Mackenzie,ed.DavidW.TorranceandThomasF.Torrance(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1961),349.3.JonathanEdwards,WhentheWickedShallHaveFilledUptheMeasureofTheirSin,WrathWillCome
UponThemtotheUttermost,inTheWorksofJonathanEdwards,ed.EdwardHickman,2vols.(1834;reprint,Edinburgh:BannerofTruth,1974),2:122.4.Russell,TheParousia,163.5.Ibid.,192.6.Ibid.,198.7.CharlesHodge,CommentaryontheEpistletotheRomans(1886;reprint,GrandRapids:Eerdmans,
1950),410,412.EmphasisisHodge’s.8.C.K.Barrett,ACommentaryontheEpistletotheRomans,Harper’sNewTestamentCommentaries,
ed.HenryChadwick(NewYork:Harper&Brothers,1957),252–53.9.Russell,TheParousia,238–39.10.C.LeslieMitton,Ephesians,NewCenturyBibleCommentary,ed.RonaldE.ClementsandMatthew
Black(London:Marshall,Morgan&Scott/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1973),55.11.Russell,TheParousia,244.W.J.ConybeareandJ.S.Howson,TheLifeandEpistlesofSt.Paul,new
ed.(1892;reprint,GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1953),708.12.Russell,TheParousia,250.13.Ibid.,254.14.SimonJ.Kistemaker,ExpositionoftheEpistletotheHebrews,NewTestamentCommentary(Grand
Rapids:Baker,1984),265.15.PhilipEdgcumbeHughes,ACommentaryontheEpistletotheHebrews(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,
1977),385.16.Ibid.,416.17.Ibid.,416–17.F.F.Bruce,TheEpistletotheHebrews:TheEnglishTextwithIntroduction,
ExpositionandNotes,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament,ed.F.F.Bruce(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1964),256.EmphasisisBruce’s.18.Russell,TheParousia,273.
Chapter5WhatabouttheDestructionofJerusalem?1.FranzDelitzsch,BiblicalCommentaryonthePropheciesofIsaiah,trans.JamesMartin,3ded.,vol.1
(1877;reprint,GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1965),189.2.SeeEdwardJ.Young,AnIntroductiontotheOldTestament,rev.ed.(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1960),
394.3.JamesL.Price,InterpretingtheNewTestament(NewYork:Holt,RinehartandWinston,1961),52.4.FlaviusJosephus,TheWarsoftheJews,inTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus,trans.WilliamWhiston,4
vols.(reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1974),1:1–521;TheAntiquitiesoftheJews,inTheWorks,2:59–4:149;TheLifeofFlaviusJosephus,inTheWorks,2:3–58;andAgainstApion,inTheWorks,4:151–238.5.Price,InterpretingtheNewTestament,53.6.Josephus,TheWarsoftheJews,1:5(preface,4).7.Ibid.,1:244(3.7.19).8.Ibid.,1:257–58(3.8.3).9.Ibid.,1:321(4.7.3).WordsinbracketssuppliedbyWhiston.10.Ibid.,1:382–83(5.6.3).Whistontranslates“THESTONECOMETH”as“THESONCOMETH,”
thoughhementionstheformerrenderinginanote.11.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),1:482(note).
12.Josephus,TheWarsoftheJews,1:400(5.9.4).13.Ibid.,1:451(6.5.1).14.Ibid.,1:453–54(6.5.3).15.Tacitus,TheHistories,trans.CliffordH.Moore,2vols.,LoebClassicalLibrary(London:
Heinemann/Cambridge:HarvardUniversity,1931),1:5–7(1.2–3).QuotedinKennethL.GentryJr.,TheBeastofRevelation(Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989),72.16.GaryDeMar,LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn
(Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991),48.ThetwoquotesarefromNigelCalder,TheCometisComing!TheFeverishLegacyofMr.Halley(NewYork:Viking,1980),12,13.Tacitus,TheAnnalsofImperialRome,ed.andtrans.MichaelGrant,rev.ed.(LondonandNewYork:Penguin,1971),324(14.22);Suetonius,TheTwelveCaesars,trans.RobertGraves,rev.ed.,revisedbyMichaelGrant(LondonandNewYork:Penguin,1979),234(6.36).17.Josephus,TheWarsoftheJews,1:454(6.5.3).BracketedwordssuppliedbyWhiston.18.Ibid.,1:455(6.5.3).19.Ibid.,1:469(6.9.2).BracketedwordssuppliedbyWhiston.
Chapter6WhatDidJohnTeachinRevelation?1.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),366.2.Ibid.3.Ibid.,367.4.GeorgeEldonLadd,ACommentaryontheRevelationofJohn(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1972),22.5.G.R.Beasley-Murray,ed.,TheBookofRevelation,NewCenturyBibleCommentary,ed.RonaldE.
ClementsandMatthewBlack(London:Marshall,Morgan,andScott,1974),52–53.ErnstLohmeyer,DieOffenbarungdesJohannes,HandbuchzumNeuenTestament,2ded.(Tübingen:Mohr,1953),8;andArethas,EchemgemseomneistemnApokalupsin,inCatenaeGraecorumpatruminNovumTestamentum,ed.JohnAnthonyCramer,8vols.(1840;reprint,Hildesheim:Olms,1967).6.RobertH.Mounce,TheBookofRevelation,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament,
ed.F.F.Bruce(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1977),64–65.SeealsoG.B.Caird,ACommentaryontheRevelationofSt.JohntheDivine,Harper’sNewTestamentCommentaries,ed.HenryChadwick(NewYork:Harper&Row,1966),12.7.Russell,TheParousia,367.8.KennethL.GentryJr.,BeforeJerusalemFell:DatingtheBookofRevelation:AnExegeticaland
HistoricalArgumentforaPre-A.D.70Composition(Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989),133.Afootnotetothefirstsentenceadds:“Inaddition,thepresenttensepossiblyshouldbesounderstoodinRevelation1:7;2:5.”9.Ibid.,138.WalterBauer,WilliamF.Arndt,andF.WilburGingrich,AGreek-EnglishLexiconofthe
NewTestamentandOtherEarlyChristianLiterature,4thed.(Chicago:UniversityofChicago,1957),814.10.JosephHenryThayer,AGreek-EnglishLexiconoftheNewTestament,4thed.(1901;reprint,Grand
Rapids:Baker,1991),616;G.Abbott-Smith,AManualGreekLexiconoftheNewTestament,3ded.(Edinburgh:T&TClark,1937),441;F.J.A.Hort,TheApocalypseofSt.John1–3:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Commentary,andAdditionalNotes(London:Macmillan,1908),6;KurtAland,AHistoryofChristianity,vol.1,FromtheBeginningstotheThresholdoftheReformation,trans.JamesL.Schaaf(Philadelphia:Fortress,1985),88.11.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,141.Gentryreferstothefollowingfourworks:HenryBarclaySwete,
TheApocalypseofSt.John:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Notes,andIndices,3ded.(1922;reprint,GrandRapids:Kregel,1977);AlbertBarnes,NotesontheBookofRevelation,inAlbertBarnes,NotesontheNewTestament(1884–85;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1996);RobertH.Mounce,TheBookofRevelation,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament,ed.F.F.Bruce(GrandRapids:
Eerdmans,1977),64–65;andJohnF.Walvoord,TheRevelationofJesusChrist(Chicago:Moody,1966),35,37.12.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,141–42;Thayer,AGreek-EnglishLexicon,oftheNewTestament,
396;Abbott-Smith,AManualGreekLexicon,282.13.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,vi.14.Ibid.15.Ibid.,27.QuotationfromArthurS.Peake,TheRevelationofJohn,HartleyLectures(London:Joseph
Johnson,1919),77.16.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,30–38.Gentrycitesatotalof138scholars.17.Irenaeus,AgainstHeresies,inTheAnte-NiceneFathers:TranslationsoftheWritingsoftheFathers
downtoAD325,ed.AlexanderRobertsandJamesDonaldson,10vols.(reprint,GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1975),1:559–60(5.30.3).QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,46–47.18.F.H.Chase,“TheDateoftheApocalypse:TheEvidenceofIrenaeus,”JournalofTheological
Studies8(1907):431–32.QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,50–51.19.JacobusWettstein,NovumTestamentumGraecum,2vols.(1751–52;reprint,Graz,Austria:
Akademische,1962),2:746;JamesM.Macdonald,TheLifeandWritingsofSt.John,ed.J.S.Howson(London:Hodder&Stoughton/NewYork:Scribner,Armstrong,1877),151–72.20.ClementofAlexandria,TheRichMan’sSalvation,inClementofAlexandria,trans.G.W.
Butterworth,LoebClassicalLibrary(London:Heinemann/NewYork:Putnam’s,1919),357(par.42).QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,68.21.Philostratus,TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,4.38.QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,70.See
Philostratus,TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,theEpistlesofApolloniusandtheTreatiseofEusebius,ed.J.S.Phillimore,2vols.(Oxford:Oxford,1912),1:437–39.22.ClementofAlexandria,TheStromata,orMiscellanies,inTheAnte-NiceneFathers:Translationsof
theWritingsoftheFathersdowntoAD325,ed.AlexanderRobertsandJamesDonaldson,10vols.(reprint,GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1975),2:554–55(7.17).QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,84.EmphasisisGentry’s.23.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,109.24.CharlesC.Torrey,TheApocalypseofJohn(NewHaven:Yale,1958),61.QuotedinGentry,Before
JerusalemFell,151.25.BernhardWeiss,AManualofIntroductiontotheNewTestament,trans.A.J.K.Davidson,2vols.,
ForeignBiblicalLibrary,ed.W.RobertsonNicoll(NewYork:Funk&Wagnalls,1889),2:82.QuotedinGentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,166.26.DonaldGuthrie,NewTestamentIntroduction,4thed.(Leicester:Apollos/DownersGrove,IL:
InterVarsity,1990),961;Mounce,TheBookofRevelation,35.27.Gentry,BeforeJerusalemFell,336.
Chapter7WhenIstheResurrection?1.KennethL.GentryJr.,“ABriefTheologicalAnalysisofHyper-Preterism,”ChalcedonReport,no.384
(July1997):22–24;EdwardE.Stevens,Stevens’ResponsetoGentry:ADetailedResponsetoDr.KennethL.GentryJr.’s...“ABriefTheologicalAnalysisofHyper-Preterism”(Bradford,PA:Kingdom,1997).2.Gentry,“ABriefTheologicalAnalysis,”22–23.3.Stevens,Stevens’ResponsetoGentry,2.4.Gentry,“ABriefTheologicalAnalysis,”23.5.Stevens,Stevens’ResponsetoGentry,9.6.Ibid.,12.EmphasisisStevens’.7.Ibid.,1.QuotesGentry,“ABriefTheologicalAnalysis,”22.8.J.StuartRussell,TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’s
SecondComing,newed.(1887;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1983),208.
9.Ibid.,210.10.MaxR.King,TheCrossandtheParousiaofChrist:TheTwoDimensionsofOneAge-Changing
Eschaton(Warren,OH:WritingandResearchMinistry,1987),410.11.Ibid.,417.12.Stevens,Stevens’ResponsetoGentry,28.13.MurrayJ.Harris,RaisedImmortal:ResurrectionandImmortalityintheNewTestament(London:
MarshallMorgan&Scott,1983/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1985);andHarris,FromGravetoGlory:ResurrectionintheNewTestament:IncludingaResponsetoNormanL.Geisler(GrandRapids:Zondervan,1990).14.Russell,TheParousia,168.15.King,TheCrossandtheParousiaofChrist,641.16.DavidChilton,ParadiseRestored:ABiblicalTheologyofDominion(FortWorth:Dominion,1985),
143.
Chapter8WhoIstheAntichrist?1.AlexanderRoss,TheEpistlesofJamesandJohn,NewInternationalCommentaryontheNew
Testament,ed.NedB.Stonehouse(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1954),168.SeealsoJohnCalvin’scommentaryon1John,andspecificallyhiscommenton2:18;thetranslationisRoss’s.2.DavidChilton,ParadiseRestored:ABiblicalTheologyofDominion(FortWorth:Dominion,1985),
111.3.G.C.Berkouwer,TheReturnofChrist,trans.JamesVanOosterom,StudiesinDogmatics(Grand
Rapids:Eerdmans,1972),265.SeeHermanBavinck,GereformeerdeDogmatiek,4thed.,4vols.(Kampen:Kok,1928–30),4:659.EnglishtranslationinBavinck,TheLastThings:HopeforThisWorldandtheNext,ed.JohnBolt,trans.JohnVriend(GrandRapids:Baker,1996),113–14.4.Ross,TheEpistlesofJamesandJohn,169(n.2).5.JohnCalvin,TheEpistlesofPaultheApostletotheRomansandtotheThessalonians,trans.Ross
Mackenzie,ed.DavidW.TorranceandThomasF.Torrance(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1961),402.6.BenjaminBreckinridgeWarfield,“ThePropheciesofSt.Paul,”inWarfield,BiblicalDoctrines(1929;
reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1981),609–10.AlsoinWarfield,BiblicalandTheologicalStudies,ed.SamuelG.Craig(Philadelphia:PresbyterianandReformed,1952),472.QuotedinGaryDeMar,LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn(Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991),159.7.Warfield,“ThePropheciesofSt.Paul”(1929),612;(1952),474.QuotedinGaryDeMar,LastDays
Madness,159–60.8.J.B.Lightfoot,NotesonEpistlesofSt.Paul:1–2Thessalonians,1Corinthians1–7,Romans1–7,
Ephesians1:1–14,ed.J.R.Harmer(1895;reprint,GrandRapids:Baker,1980),111.9.Berkouwer,TheReturnofChrist,279.10.KennethL.GentryJr.,BeforeJerusalemFell:DatingtheBookofRevelation:AnExegeticaland
HistoricalArgumentforaPre-A.D.70Composition(Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989).11.KennethL.GentryJr.,TheBeastofRevelation(Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989).12.Gentry,TheBeastofRevelation,10.13.Ibid.,14.14.Suetonius,Suetonius:TheLivesoftheCaesars,trans.J.C.Rolfe,2vols.,LoebClassicalLibrary
(CambridgeandLondon:HarvardUniversity,1914),2:133(6.29).QuotedinGentry,TheBeastofRevelation,17.15.Tacitus,TheHistories,trans.CliffordH.Moore,2vols.,LoebClassicalLibrary(London:Heinemann
/Cambridge:HarvardUniversity,1931),2:17,15(4.8,7);Pliny,NaturalHistory,trans.HarrisRackhamandW.H.S.Jones,10vols.,LoebClassicalLibrary(London:Heinemann/Cambridge:HarvardUniversity,1938–63),2:537(7.8.46),6:359(22.46.92);Juvenal,Satires,inJuvenalandPersius,trans.G.G.Ramsay,
rev.ed.,LoebClassicalLibrary(CambridgeandLondon:HarvardUniversity,1940),177(8.223);Philostratus,TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,4.38.QuotedinGentry,TheBeastofRevelation,42.Cf.Philostratus,TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,theEpistlesofApolloniusandtheTreatiseofEusebius,ed.J.S.Phillimore,2vols.(Oxford:OxfordUniversity,1912),1:437–39.16.Gentry,TheBeastofRevelation,31.17.Ibid.,34.MarcusJastrow,ed.,ADictionaryoftheTargumim,theTalmudBabliandYerushalmi,and
theMidrashicLiterature,2vols.(1903;reprint,NewYork:Pardes,1950),2:909.18.BruceM.Metzger,ATextualCommentaryontheGreekNewTestament,correcteded.(Stuttgart:
UnitedBibleSocieties,1975),750.QuotedinGentry,TheBeastofRevelation,35.19.Gentry,TheBeastofRevelation,64–65.
Chapter9WhenIstheMillennium?1.AnthonyA.Hoekema,TheBibleandtheFuture(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1979),174.Quotedin
KennethL.GentryJr.,HeShallHaveDominion:APostmillennialEschatology(Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1992),56.2.Gentry,HeShallHaveDominion,57–58.3.CharlesCaldwellRyrie,TheBasisofthePremillennialFaith(NewYork:Loizeaux,1953),12.4.Gentry,HeShallHaveDominion,60–61.5.GeorgeEldonLadd,ATheologyoftheNewTestament(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1974);“Historic
Premillennialism,”inRobertG.Clouse,ed.,TheMeaningoftheMillennium:FourViews(DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,1977);andTheBlessedHope(GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1956).6.Ladd,TheBlessedHope,162.7.Ibid.,163–64.8.Gentry,HeShallHaveDominion,63.9.GregL.Bahnsen,“ThePrimaFacieAcceptabilityofPostmillennialism,”JournalofChristian
Reconstruction3(Winter1976–77):66.QuotedinGentry,HeShallHaveDominion,71.EmphasisisBahnsen’s.10.Bahnsen,“ThePrimaFacieAcceptabilityofPostmillennialism,”71.QuotedinGentry,HeShall
HaveDominion,71.11.Gentry,HeShallHaveDominion,72.Inafootnotetothereferenceto“BannerofTruthcircles,”
Gentrywrites:“TheCalvinistswhoareassociatedwiththisgroupareself-consciouslyidentifiedwiththerevivalisticpostmillennialismofJonathanEdwardsratherthanwiththetheonomicpostmillennialismofthecolonialAmericanPuritans.”
GLOSSARY
analogiafide.Analogyoffaith;basedontheprinciplethatScriptureisitsownbestinterpreter,thisisthepracticeofinterpretingonebiblicalpassageinlightofanother.Page76.
Apocalypse,the.TheBookofRevelation.Apocalyptic.Biblicalbooksandpassagesdealingwitheschatologicalthemes;adistinctgenrewithmanyextra-biblicalexamplesaswell.
apologia.Apology,defense.Page15.apriori.Fromtheformer;deductively.Page150.carnisresurrectionem.Bodilyorphysicalresurrection.Page171.Consistenteschatology.Theviewthateschatologicaleventsaresudden,catastrophiceventswroughtbyGod,noteventsthatevolvethroughevolutionarydevelopment.Seepages24,57,72,73,75,186.
Dispensationalism.AneschatologicalsystemthatseesIsraelandthechurchasseparateentitiesandthatseesthechurchagebeingfollowedbyJesus’smillennialreignonearth.Seepages27,166,209–11,215.
Eschatology.Thedivisionofsystematictheologydealingprimarilywiththefuture,thelastthings.
explicatioexeventu.Explicationoutoftheevent.Page73.Hermeneutic.Asystemofbiblicalinterpretation.hicetnunc.Hereandnow.Page122.inlimine.Onthethreshold;attheonset.Page77.OlivetDiscourse.Jesus’sdiscoursetohisdisciplesneartheendofhisearthlyministry.Thisdiscourse,reportedinallthreeSynopticGospelsbutmostfullyinMatthew,wasdeliveredafterJesus“satontheMountofOlives,oppositethetemple.”
Parousia.Coming;usedmostoftenofJesus’ssecondcoming.
PastoralEpistles.ThreeofPaul’sletters:1Timothy,2Timothy,andTitus.Pentateuch.ThefirstfivebooksoftheOldTestament:Genesis,Exodus,Leviticus,Numbers,andDeuteronomy.
Preterism.Aneschatologicalviewpointthatplacesmanyoralleschatologicaleventsinthepast,especiallyduringthedestructionofJerusaleminAD70.Fullpreterismassignsalloftheseeventstothefirstcentury.Partialpreterismassignsmanyoftheseeventstothefirstcentury,butnotthesecondcoming,theresurrection,andthefinaljudgment.
Orthodoxpreterismisanothernameforpartialpreterism.primafacie.Atfirstappearance;plainorclear.Pages18,64,76,201.Rapture.Theraisingofthosewhoarealivewhenthedeadareresurrected.Realizedeschatology.TheviewthattheeschatologicalkingdomofGodwasusheredinduringtheearthlyministryofJesus.Seepages25,57,78,205.
reductioadabsurdum.Reductiontotheabsurd.Page70.sensusliteralis.Theliterarysense;thesenseofatext,interpretedinlightofitsliteraryformorgenre.
solaScriptura.Scripturealone.Pages167–68.SynopticGospels.ThefirstthreeGospels:Matthew,Mark,andLuke.terminusadquem.Theendtowhich;thefinallimitingpoint.Page44.tertiususus.Thethirduse(oftheLaw);theongoingfunctionofthemorallawintheChristian’slife.Page215.
BIBLIOGRAPHYOFWORKSCITED
General
Abbott-Smith,G.AManualGreekLexiconoftheNewTestament.3ded.Edinburgh:T&TClark,1937.Aland,Kurt.AHistoryofChristianity.Vol.1.FromtheBeginningstotheThresholdoftheReformation.TranslatedbyJamesL.Schaaf.Philadelphia:Fortress,1985.
Alford,Henry.TheGreekTestament:WithaCriticallyRevisedText,aDigestofVariousReadings,MarginalReferencestoVerbalandIdiomaticUsage,Prolegomena,andaCriticalandExegeticalCommentary.4thed.4vols.London:Rivingtons,1859–61.
Arethas.EcheµgeµseoµneisteµnApokalupsin.InJohnAnthonyCramer,ed.CatenaeGraecorumpatruminNovumTestamentum.8vols.1840.Reprinted.Hildesheim:Olms,1967.8:171–582.
Bahnsen,GregL.“ThePrimaFacieAcceptabilityofPostmillennialism.”JournalofChristianReconstruction3(Winter1976–77):48–105.
Bauer,Walter,WilliamF.Arndt,andF.WilburGingrich.AGreek-EnglishLexiconoftheNewTestamentandOtherEarlyChristianLiterature.4thed.Chicago:UniversityofChicago,1957.
Bavinck,Herman.GereformeerdeDogmatiek.4thed.4vols.Kampen:Kok,1928–30.———.TheLastThings:HopeforThisWorldandtheNext.EditedbyJohnBolt.TranslatedbyJohnVriend.GrandRapids:Baker,1996.
Berkouwer,G.C.TheReturnofChrist.TranslatedbyJamesVanOosterom.StudiesinDogmatics.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1972.
Büchsel,Friedrich.“Genea.”InGerhardKittel,ed.TheologicalDictionaryoftheNewTestament.TranslatedandeditedbyGeoffreyW.Bromiley.Vol.1.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1964,662–65.
Calder,Nigel.TheCometIsComing!TheFeverishLegacyofMr.Halley.NewYork:Viking,1980.Campbell,George.TheFourGospelsTranslatedfromtheGreek:WithPreliminaryDissertations,andNotesCriticalandExplanatory.Philadelphia:Bartram,1799.
Chase,F.H.“TheDateoftheApocalypse:TheEvidenceofIrenaeus.”JournalofTheologicalStudies8(1907):431–35.
Chilton,David.TheGreatTribulation.FortWorth:Dominion,1987.———.ParadiseRestored:ABiblicalTheologyofDominion.FortWorth:Dominion,1985.ClementofAlexandria.TheRichMan’sSalvation.InClementofAlexandria.TranslatedbyG.W.Butterworth.LoebClassicalLibrary.London:Heinemann/NewYork:Putnam’s,1919,265–367.
———.TheStromata,orMiscellanies.InTheAnte-NiceneFathers:TranslationsoftheWritingsoftheFathersdowntoA.D.325.EditedbyAlexanderRoberts,JamesDonaldson,andA.ClevelandCoxe.10vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1975.2:299–568.
Conybeare,W.J.,andJ.S.Howson.TheLifeandEpistlesofSt.Paul.Newed.1892.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1953.
DeMar,Gary.LastDaysMadness:TheFollyofTryingtoPredictWhenChristWillReturn.Brentwood,TN:Wolgemuth&Hyatt,1991.
Dodd,C.H.TheInterpretationoftheFourthGospel.London:CambridgeUniversity,1953.———.TheParablesoftheKingdom.London:Nisbet,1935.Edwards,Jonathan.WhentheWickedShallHaveFilledUptheMeasureofTheirSin,WrathWillComeuponThemtotheUttermost.InTheWorksofJonathanEdwards.EditedbyEdwardHickman.2vols.1834.Reprinted.Edinburgh:BannerofTruth,1974.
Freeman,HobartE.AnIntroductiontotheOldTestamentProphets.Chicago:Moody,1968.Gentry,KennethL.,Jr.TheBeastofRevelation.Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989.———.BeforeJerusalemFell:DatingtheBookofRevelation:AnExegeticalandHistoricalArgumentforaPre-A.D.70Composition.Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1989.
———.“ABriefTheologicalAnalysisofHyper-Preterism,”ChalcedonReport,no.384(July1997),22–24.
———.HeShallHaveDominion:APostmillennialEschatology.Tyler,TX:InstituteforChristianEconomics,1992.
Guthrie,Donald.NewTestamentIntroduction.4thed.Leicester:Apollos/DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,1990.
Harnack,Adolf.WhatIsChristianity?LecturesDeliveredintheUniversityofBerlinduringtheWinter-Term1899–1900.TranslatedbyThomasBaileySaunders.2ded.1901.Reprinted.NewYork:Harper&Row,1957.
Harris,MurrayJ.FromGravetoGlory:ResurrectionintheNewTestament:IncludingaResponsetoNormanL.Geisler.GrandRapids:Zondervan,1990.
———.RaisedImmortal:ResurrectionandImmortalityintheNewTestament.London:MarshallMorgan&Scott,1983/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1985.
Hoekema,AnthonyA.TheBibleandtheFuture.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1979.Irenaeus.AgainstHeresies.InTheAnte-NiceneFathers:TranslationsoftheWritingsoftheFathersDowntoA.D.325.EditedbyAlexanderRobertsandJamesDonaldson.10vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1975.1:309–567.
Jastrow,Marcus,ed.ADictionaryoftheTargumim,theTalmudBabliandYerushalmi,andtheMidrashicLiterature.2vols.1903.Reprinted.NewYork:Pardes,1950.
Josephus,Flavius.AgainstApion.InTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus.TranslatedbyWilliamWhiston.4vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1974.4:151–238.
———.TheAntiquitiesoftheJews.InTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus.TranslatedbyWilliamWhiston.4vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1974.2:59–4:149.
———.TheLifeofFlaviusJosephus.InTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus.TranslatedbyWilliamWhiston.4vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1974.2:3–58.
———.TheWarsoftheJews.InTheWorksofFlaviusJosephus.TranslatedbyWilliamWhiston.4vols.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1974.1:1–521.
Juvenal.Satires.InJuvenalandPersius.TranslatedbyG.G.Ramsay.Rev.ed.LoebClassicalLibrary.CambridgeandLondon:HarvardUniversity,1940,2–307.
King,MaxR.TheCrossandtheParousiaofChrist:TheTwoDimensionsofOneAge-ChangingEschaton.Warren,OH:WritingandResearchMinistry,1987.
Ladd,GeorgeEldon.TheBlessedHope.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1956.———.“HistoricPremillennialism.”InRobertG.Clouse,ed.TheMeaningoftheMillennium:FourViews.DownersGrove,IL:InterVarsity,1977,17–40.
———.ATheologyoftheNewTestament.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1974.Macdonald,JamesM.TheLifeandWritingsofSt.John.EditedbyJ.S.Howson.London:Hodder&Stoughton/NewYork:Scribner,Armstrong,1877.
Mattill,A.J.,Jr.LukeandtheLastThings:APerspectivefortheUnderstandingofLukanThought.Dillsboro,NC:WesternNorthCarolina,1979.
Metzger,BruceM.ATextualCommentaryontheGreekNewTestament.Correcteded.Stuttgart:UnitedBibleSocieties,1975.
Neander,Augustus.TheLifeofJesusChristinItsHistoricalConnexionandHistoricalDevelopement.3ded.TranslatedbyJohnMcClintockandCharlesE.Blumenthal.NewYork:Harper,1849.
Philostratus.TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana.InPhilostratus.TheLifeofApolloniusofTyana,theEpistlesofApolloniusandtheTreatiseofEusebius.TranslatedbyF.C.Conybeare.2vols.LoebClassicalLibrary.London:Heinemann/NewYork:Putnam’s,1921–27.1:1–2:405.
Pliny.NaturalHistory.TranslatedbyHarrisRackhamandW.H.S.Jones.10vols.LoebClassicalLibrary.London:Heinemann/Cambridge:HarvardUniversity,1938–63.
Price,JamesL.InterpretingtheNewTestament.NewYork:Holt,RinehartandWinston,1961.Ridderbos,Herman.TheComingoftheKingdom.TranslatedbyH.deJongste.EditedbyRaymondO.Zorn.Philadelphia:PresbyterianandReformed,1962.
Russell,Bertrand.WhyIAmNotaChristian:AndOtherEssaysonReligionandRelatedSubjects.EditedbyPaulEdwards.London:Allen&Unwin/NewYork:Simon&Schuster,1957.
Russell,J.Stuart.TheParousia:ACriticalInquiryintotheNewTestamentDoctrineofOurLord’sSecondComing.Newed.1887.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1983.
Ryrie,CharlesCaldwell.TheBasisofthePremillennialFaith.NewYork:Loizeaux,1953.Schierse,J.“HistorischeKritikundtheologischeExegesedersynoptischenEvangelienerläutertanMk.9:1.”Scholastik29(1959):520–36.
Schweitzer,Albert.TheQuestoftheHistoricalJesus:ACriticalStudyofItsProgressfromReimarustoWrede.TranslatedbyW.Montgomery.1910.Reprinted.NewYork:Macmillan,1956.
Stevens,EdwardE.Stevens’ResponsetoGentry:ADetailedResponsetoDr.KennethL.GentryJr.’s...“ABriefTheologicalAnalysisofHyper-Preterism.”Bradford,PA:Kingdom,1997.
Stier,Rudolf.TheWordsoftheLordJesus.Vol.1,OurLord’sFirstWords,andtheGospelsofMatthew,Mark,andLukeSpecially.TranslatedbyWilliamB.Pope.RevisedbyJamesStrongandHenryB.Smith.NewYork:Tibbals,1864.
Suetonius.Suetonius:TheLivesoftheCaesars.TranslatedbyJ.C.Rolfe.2vols.LoebClassicalLibrary.CambridgeandLondon:HarvardUniversity,1914.
———.TheTwelveCaesars.TranslatedbyRobertGraves.Rev.ed.RevisedbyMichaelGrant.LondonandNewYork:Penguin,1979.
Tacitus.TheAnnalsofImperialRome.EditedandtranslatedbyMichaelGrant.Rev.ed.LondonandNewYork:Penguin,1971.
———.TheHistories.TranslatedbyCliffordH.Moore.2vols.LoebClassicalLibrary.Cambridge:HarvardUniversity/London:Heinemann,1931.
Thayer,JosephHenry.AGreek-EnglishLexiconoftheNewTestament.4thed.1901.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1991.
Vawter,Bruce.TheConscienceofIsrael:Pre-exilicProphetsandProphecy.NewYork:Sheed&Ward,1961.
Warfield,BenjaminBreckinridge.“ThePropheciesofSt.Paul.”InBiblicalDoctrines.1929.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1981,599–640.AndinBiblicalandTheologicalStudies.EditedbySamuelG.Craig.Philadelphia:PresbyterianandReformed,1952,463–502.
Weiss,Bernhard.AManualofIntroductiontotheNewTestament.TranslatedbyA.J.K.Davidson.2vols.ForeignBiblicalLibrary.EditedbyW.RobertsonNicoll.NewYork:Funk&Wagnalls,1889.
Weiss,Johannes.DiePredigtJesuvomReicheGottes.1892.Englishtranslation.Jesus’sProclamationoftheKingdomofGod.EditedandtranslatedbyRichardHydeHiersandDavidLarrimoreHolland.LivesofJesusSeries.EditedbyLeanderE.Keck.Philadelphia:Fortress,1971.
Wettstein,Jacobus,ed.NovumTestamentumGraecum.2vols.1751–52.Reprinted.Graz,Austria:Akademische,1962.
Young,EdwardJ.AnIntroductiontotheOldTestament.Rev.ed.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1960.
Commentaries
IsaiahDelitzsch,Franz.BiblicalCommentaryonthePropheciesofIsaiah.TranslatedbyJamesMartin.3ded.Vol.1.1877.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1965.
MatthewAlbright,W.F.,andC.S.Mann.Matthew:Introduction,Translation,andNotes.AnchorBible.EditedbyW.F.AlbrightandDavidNoelFreedman.GardenCity:Doubleday,1971.
Argyle,A.W.TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew.CambridgeBibleCommentary.EditedbyP.R.Ackroyd,A.R.C.Leaney,andJ.W.Packer.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity,1963.
Hill,David.TheGospelofMatthew.NewCenturyBibleCommentary.EditedbyRonaldE.ClementsandMatthewBlack.London:Marshall,Morgan&Scott/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1972.
Lange,JohnPeter.TheGospelaccordingtoMatthew.TranslatedbyPhilipSchaff.CommentaryontheHolyScriptures.EditedbyJohnPeterLange.1866.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Zondervan,1960.
MarkCalvin,John.CommentaryonaHarmonyoftheEvangelists,Matthew,Mark,andLuke.TranslatedbyWilliamPringle.Vol3.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1984.
Lane,WilliamL.TheGospelaccordingtoMark.NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1974.
Taylor,Vincent.TheGospelaccordingtoSt.Mark:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Notes,andIndexes.2ded.1966.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1981.
LukeGreijdanus,Seakle.HetheiligEvangelienaardebeschrijvingvanLucas.2vols.KommentaarophetNieuweTestament.EditedbySeakleGreijdanus,F.W.Grosheide,andJ.A.C.vanLeeuwen.Amsterdam:VanBottenburg,1940–41.
Marshall,I.Howard.TheGospelofLuke:ACommentaryontheGreekText.NewInternationalGreekTestamentCommentary.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1978.
RomansBarrett,C.K.ACommentaryontheEpistletotheRomans.Harper’sNewTestamentCommentaries.EditedbyHenryChadwick.NewYork:Harper&Brothers,1957.
Calvin,John.TheEpistlesofPaultheApostletotheRomansandtotheThessalonians.TranslatedbyRossMackenzie.EditedbyDavidW.TorranceandThomasF.Torrance.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1961.
Hodge,Charles.CommentaryontheEpistletotheRomans.1886.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1950.
Lightfoot,J.B.NotesonEpistlesofSt.Paul:1–2Thessalonians,1Corinthians1–7,Romans1–7,Ephesians1:1–14.EditedbyJ.R.Harmer.1895.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1980.
EphesiansMitton,C.Leslie.Ephesians.NewCenturyBibleCommentary.EditedbyRonaldE.ClementsandMatthewBlack.London:Marshall,Morgan&Scott/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1973.
HebrewsBruce,F.F.TheEpistletotheHebrews:TheEnglishTextwithIntroduction,ExpositionandNotes.NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament.EditedbyF.F.Bruce.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1964.
Hughes,PhilipEdgcumbe.ACommentaryontheEpistletotheHebrews.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1977.Kistemaker,SimonJ.ExpositionoftheEpistletotheHebrews.NewTestamentCommentary.GrandRapids:Baker,1984.
1JohnCalvin,John.TheGospelaccordingtoSt.John11–21andTheFirstEpistleofJohn.TranslatedbyT.H.L.Parker.Calvin’sCommentaries.EditedbyDavidW.TorranceandThomasF.Torrance.Edinburgh:OliverandBoyd/GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1961.
Ross,Alexander.TheEpistlesofJamesandJohn.NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament.EditedbyNedB.Stonehouse.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1954.
RevelationBarnes,Albert.NotesontheBookofRevelation.EditedbyRobertFrew.InNotesontheNewTestament.1884–85.Reprinted.GrandRapids:Baker,1996.
Beasley-Murray,G.R.,ed.TheBookofRevelation.NewCenturyBibleCommentary.EditedbyRonaldE.ClementsandMatthewBlack.London:Marshall,Morgan&Scott,1974.
Caird,G.B.ACommentaryontheRevelationofSt.JohntheDivine.Harper’sNewTestamentCommentaries.EditedbyHenryChadwick.NewYork:Harper&Row,1966.
Hort,F.J.A.TheApocalypseofSt.John1–3:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Commentary,andAdditionalNotes.London:Macmillan,1908.ReprintedinHort,F.J.A.ExpositoryandExegeticalStudies:CompendiumofWorksFormerlyPublishedSeparately.LimitedClassicalReprintLibrary.Minneapolis:KlockandKlock,1980.
Ladd,GeorgeEldon.ACommentaryontheRevelationofJohn.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1972.Lohmeyer,Ernst.DieOffenbarungdesJohannes.HandbuchzumNeuenTestament.2ded.Tübingen:Mohr,1953.
Mounce,RobertH.TheBookofRevelation.NewInternationalCommentaryontheNewTestament.EditedbyF.F.Bruce.GrandRapids:Eerdmans,1977.
Peake,ArthurS.TheRevelationofJohn.HartleyLectures.London:JosephJohnson,1919.Swete,HenryBarclay.TheApocalypseofSt.John:TheGreekTextwithIntroduction,Notes,andIndices.3ded.London:Macmillan,1922.
Torrey,CharlesC.TheApocalypseofJohn.NewHaven:YaleUniversity,1958.Walvoord,JohnF.TheRevelationofJesusChrist:ACommentary.Chicago:Moody,1966.
INDEXOFNAMES
Abbott-Smith,G.,150–51Abraham,20,209Adam,175Adams,JayE.,152,211Aland,Kurt,150Albright,W.F.,42,44,46AlexandertheGreat,124Allis,OswaldT.,211Amos,86–88Andrew,16,35–36,227Anthony,Mark(MarcusAntonius),126AntiochusIII,124AntiochusEpiphanes(AntiochusIV),46,124Antipater,126Apion,127ApolloniusofTyana,154,156,202Archer,GleasonL.,211Arethas,146,154,157Argyle,A.W.,50Aristotle,124Arndt,W.F.,149–50Athanasius,211Augustine,211Augustus(Caesar),125–26,157,159–61,204
Bahnsen,GregL.,153,211,214Barnes,Albert,150Barnhouse,DonaldG.,211Barrett,C.K.,112Barth,Karl,30Bauer,Walter,149–50Baur,F.C.,153Bavinck,Herman,190Beasley-Murray,G.R.,146–47Berkhof,Louis,211Berkouwer,G.C.,190,199,211Bousset,Wilhelm,146,153Bruce,F.F.,121–22,153Brutus,125
Bultmann,Rudolf,15,122,153
Caird,G.B.,147Caligula,42,126–27,160,204Calvin,John,36–37,40–41,47,50,52–53,104,109,141,165–66,187,193,211,215Campbell,George,50Cerinthus,190Chafer,LewisSperry,211Chase,F.H.,155–56Chilton,David,67,163,184,190Clarke,Adam,153ClaudiusI,42,126,160ClementofAlexandria,153,156–57ClementofRome,154,160–61Cleopatra,126Conybeare,W.J.,115Crassus,125Cullmann,Oscar,25,27
Dabney,RobertLewis,211Daniel,17,45,47,99,125,179,195,220,231Darby,J.N.,211David,209Davidson,Samuel,153Davis,JohnJefferson,211DeHaan,M.R.,211Delitzsch,Franz,125DeMar,Gary,55,65–67,97,100,136,163,195DioCassius,159Dixon,Jeane,185Dodd,C.H.,25Domitian,154–57,159,161
Edersheim,Alfred,153Edwards,Jonathan,105,211Eichhorn,Johann,153Elijah,84,89,104Elisha,139Epiphanius,154,157Erdman,W.J.,211Eusebius,154,157,211Ezekiel,137–39
Fadus,Cuspius,40Farrar,F.W.,153Feinberg,CharlesL.,211Felix,40,127Fitzmyer,JosephA.,153Freeman,HobartE.,85–86
Galba,126,159,160Geisler,NormanL.,211Gentry,KennethL.,Jr.,149–50,152–58,160–70,180,199–204,208–9,212–14,216–17Gingrich,F.W.,149–50Godet,FredericL.,211Greijdanus,Seakle,72–73Guthrie,Donald,161
Harnack,Adolf,22–23Harris,MurrayJ.,180–81Hegesippus,132Hendricksen,William,211Herod(theGreat),132HerodAgrippaII,127Hilgenfeld,Adolf,153Hill,David,58–59Hodge,A.A.,211Hodge,Charles,111–12,211Hoekema,AnthonyA.,207,211Hort,F.J.A.,150Hosea,87Howson,J.S.,115Hughes,PhilipEdgcumbe,119–21
Irenaeus,153–56,191,211Ironside,HarryA.,211Isaiah,51–52,77,87,125,143
James,16,35–36,132,227Jastrow,Marcus,202Jeremiah,143Jerome,125,154,157,191Jesus,139–40Jesus(Christ),andpassim,11–17Joel,85–86John,16,35–36,117,144–47,154–57,160,185–91,194,196,198–200,227JohntheBaptist,26,69,82,89,90,97,104Josephus,Flavius,30,40,46,48,126–36,139–40,150,159JuliusCaesar,125–26,159–60JustinMartyr,191,211Juvenal,202
Kaiser,WalterC.,211Kant,Immanuel,23Kik,J.Marcellus,211King,MaxR.,163–64,178,180,182Kistemaker,Simon,J.,119Kittel,Gerhard,71Knight,GeorgeW.,152
Kümmel,W.G.,65Kuyper,Abraham,31,211
Ladd,GeorgeEldon,145–46,210–12Lane,WilliamL.,33–34,42,61–62,71–72Lange,JohnPeter,50,68Lepidus,126Lightfoot,J.B.,153,196Lindsey,Hal,211Lohmeyer,Ernst,146Luke,36,38,51,53,59–60,90,95–96,107Luther,Martin,74–77
Macdonald,JamesM.,155Machen,J.Gresham,211Malachi,84,86,89Mann,C.S.,42,44,46Mark,16,36,38,59–60Marshall,I.Howard,91Matthew,36,38–39,43,46,60Metzger,BruceM.,203Miladin,George,211Mitton,C.Leslie,114Moses,84Moule,C.F.D.,153Mounce,RobertH.,147–48,150,161Murray,IainH.,211Murray,John,211
Neander,Augustus,92Nebuchadnezzar,125Nero,126,131,135–36,156–57,159–62,174,201–4Noah,58,221,236–37North,Gary,211
Octavian(GaiusOctavius).SeeAugustus(Caesar),126Otho,126,159–60Owen,John,211
Papias,154,157,211Paul,43–44,97,104,107–13,117,147–48,153,157,172–75,177–78,181–84,189,191–96,198,213Payne,J.Barton,211Pentecost,J.Dwight,211Peter,16,35–36,86,89,117,227Pilate,Pontius,40,100,125,159Pliny,201Polycarp,154Pompey,125–26Price,JamesL.,126–28
PtolemyI,124
Reimarus,HermannSamuel,23Ridderbos,Herman,23,25–26,65–66,72–73Ritschl,Albrecht,22–23Robinson,JohnA.T.,153RomulusAugustulus,125Ross,Alexander,186,191Rushdoony,R.J.,211Russell,Bertrand,12–15,18–19Russell,J.Stuart,28–29,37–39,41–44,46–57,59,62–64,67–68,70–72,76–77,80–82,85–86,89,92,94–
95,100,103–4,106–10,112–15,117,120,122,132,143–44,148,157,163,172–74,176–78,180–82Ryrie,CharlesCaldwell,209,211
Schierse,J.,61Schweitzer,Albert,23–25,57Shakespeare,William,125Shedd,W.G.T.,211Simeon,107Spencer,Herbert,19Sproul,R.C.,169Stevens,EdwardE.,164–70,180–81Stier,Rudolf,68Strauss,DavidFriedrich,21Strong,AugustusH.,153,211Stuart,Moses,50Suetonius,136,159,201Swete,HenryBarclay,150,153
Tacitus,135–36,139,201Taylor,Vincent,34Terry,MiltonS.,153,180Tertullian,154,157,191,211Thayer,JosephHenry,150–51Theophylact,154,157Thornwell,J.H.,211Tiberius,46,126,157,160–61Titus,127,130–31,133Torrey,CharlesC.,159Torrey,R.A.,211
Uzziah,125
Varro,MarcusTerentius,125Vawter,Bruce,87Vespasian,126–27,129–31,159–60Vitellius,46,126,131,159–60
Waltke,BruceK.,211
Walvoord,JohnF.,150,211Warfield,BenjaminBreckinridge,195,211Warren,W.,38Weiss,Bernhard,160Weiss,Johannes,23,57Wellhausen,Julius,20Wettstein,Jacobus,155Wrede,William,21,23
Young,EdwardJ.,211
Zacharias,83,90Zahn,Theodor,211Zephaniah,87–88
INDEXOFSCRIPTURE
Genesischap.320
Judges2:11–132016:2320
2Kings6:17139
Isaiah6:1–1312513:9–105213:135234:3–552
Ezekiel1:22–2813810:15–19139
Daniel2:281454:19–27125chap.71799:274612:499
Joel1:15852:1–2852:11852:30–3185
2:31853:14853:1885
Amos5:18–2087
Obadiah1585
Zephaniah1:7–17882:1–388
Zechariah12:1050
Malachi3:1924:1–584
Matthew3:2263:10263:12267:2211510:1511610:2211510:22–239810:2311,13,28,44,63,9611:166811:2211611:2411612:3611612:396812:416812:426912:456913:36–508013:388113:38–408113:3981,11513:39–4081–8213:4081,108,115
13:49108,115chap.166216:2799,17916:27–286016:2813,28,58,60,62,17919:2811422:1–149223:13–309223:3668chap.2433,65,67,121,19524:1–234–3524:1–44226–3924:1–25:46219–2524:212324:335–36,115,17824:4–133924:54024:640,108,11524:74024:9–104024:104124:10–1119024:114124:124124:13108,11524:1441,43–44,108,115,17824:1541,46,19524:15–164924:15–2245,4924:20–247324:2141,10524:23–284724:284824:294124:29–308524:29–314924:3033,4924:3118324:32–335424:337324:3428,56–60,62,66,73,17924:34–395824:35–365824:3665,11626:4518626:6496,98,10027:462428:20115
Mark1:151148:38699:160,1799:2619:2760chap.133313:1–234–3513:1–301813:1–37226–3613:3–435–3613:64013:74013:84013:94013:104113:11–134013:144113:194113:24–254113:266113:3018,66,73,14513:31–3273–74
Luke1:6883,902:251073:71047:11–179010:1211611:506911:516917:256918:8147,15019:11–269419:11–279219:39–409119:39–4491chap.213321:5–634–3521:5–36226–3921:735–3621:84021:94021:104021:114021:12–174021:2041,195
21:20–249521:2341,10421:2479,9621:254121:279621:2810621:3117921:326621:34116
John6:391176:401176:441176:5411711:2411718:3617819:15159
Acts1:9–11512:16–21862:2089,1163:2111410:3315012:715014:2217917:1515022:18150
Romans2:4–61102:5104,1162:161108:19107,1139:31069:44713:1198,14613:11–1297,11113:129816:20147–48,150
1Corinthians1:7–8107–81:81163:13115
3:13–151085:51167:29–301467:29–31109,1467:3197–9810:1197–98,100,109,119chap.15171,177,18115:2017815:20–2617515:2410815:50–5817215:51172
2Corinthians1:14116
Galatians6:16213
Ephesians1:7–10113–141:101822:71153:5–61144:30117
Philippians2:161164:597,98
Colossians1:6441:23443:41123:6112
1Thessalonianschap.11041:9–101031:10104chap.21042:14–161962:16104–5,1952:19106
chap.41824:13–181814:161634:16–171844:17106,1815:21165:41165:6–10112
2Thessalonians2:3116,191,193,1952:3–4193,1982:3–101062:3–11192,1962:41932:71942:81942:8–9198
1Timothy3:14150
2Timothy1:121161:181164:8116
Hebrews1:2118–119chap.91189:23–281189:261159:28119chap.1011810:19–2512010:2511510:37120,14612:28179
James5:8–997,99
1Peter4:797–98,146
2Peter1:111792:91163:71163:81473:12116
1John2:1897,99,189,1982:18–201864:1–4188,1984:31854:17116
Jude6116
Revelation1:197,99,149–51,2011:1–3141,1441:397,99,121,150–511:7541:19150–512:16148–49,1513:10150–513:1197,99,149,1516:17116chap.1116011:116011:15179chap.1319913:1198–20013:1–14:119813:4–519913:519913:719913:18199,200,20316:1411617:7–1715817:920017:9–1320020:1–820620:420520:4–517820:4–620722:699,149–51
22:6–797,14922:799,15122:1097,99,150–5122:1297,99,149,15122:2097,100,149,151
Dr.R.C.SproulisfounderandchairmanofLigonierMinistries,aninternationalChristianeducationministrylocatednearOrlando,Florida.HeisalsocopastorofSaintAndrew’sChapelinSanford,Florida,chancellorofReformationBibleCollege,andexecutiveeditorofTabletalkmagazine.Dr.Sproul’steachingcanbehearddailyontheradioprogramRenewingYour
Mind,whichisbroadcastonhundredsofradiooutletsintheUnitedStatesandinmorethanfortycountriesworldwide.Hehasproducedmorethanthreehundredlectureseriesandhasrecordedmorethaneightyvideoseriesonsubjectssuchasthehistoryofphilosophy,theology,Biblestudy,apologetics,andChristianliving.Dr.Sproulhascontributeddozensofarticlestonationalevangelical
publications;hasspokenatconferences,churches,andschoolsaroundtheworld;andhaswrittenmorethanninetybooks,includingTheHolinessofGod,FaithAlone,andEveryone’saTheologian.HeisalsogeneraleditoroftheReformationStudyBible,andhashadadistinguishedacademicteachingcareeratvariouscollegesandseminaries.Dr.SproulholdsdegreesfromWestminsterCollege,PittsburghTheological
Seminary,theFreeUniversityofAmsterdam,andWhitefieldTheologicalSeminary.Heliveswithhiswife,Vesta,inSanford,Florida.
AmongOtherBooksbyR.C.Sproul
ChosenbyGodDefendingYourFaithEveryone’saTheologianFaithAlone
TheHolinessofGodHowThenShallWeWorship?TheInvisibleHandNotaChance
PleasingGodThePrayeroftheLordThePromisesofGodScriptureAloneSurprisedbySufferingTheTruthoftheCross
TruthsWeConfessWhatIsReformedTheology?