the life and times of an architecture · the life and times of an architecture: architectural...
TRANSCRIPT
© CGI Group Inc. CONFIDENTIAL
The Life and Times of an ArchitectureFinding the common ground between traditional and agile architecting
Eltjo PoortSATURN 2017
What do we architect?
Internal structure of software Software CI/CD pipelines
IT infrastructure for application landscape Embedded systems
Integrated software systems Enterprise IT systems Outsourcing services The world’s largest robot
2
3
When do we architect?
Traditional governance
Project
Agile governance
Architectural Epic
TransformConstructElaborateConceive
Funnel Backlog Analysis Implement
4
Definition of Solution
Changes: solution elements are created, modified or removedDelivered: coordination depends on governance model:• agile or traditional• value stream, program or project• contractual or otherwiseDefined: depends on governance model:• Epic / set of (user) stories• Program / project definition• Contract• Change request
Solution: a coherent set of changes delivered to address a defined set of stakeholder needs
5
How do we architect?
Architecture as a stream of design decisions lowers the cost of change:
• Convey rationale and options• Convey changes and implications• Deal with changing context
Knowing the “Why?” behind an architectural decision is key to revisiting that decision when things change
6
Why do we architect?
Architecture’s primary business goal is risk and cost reduction, and it works.
Projects that apply architecture practices have:• Reduced uncertainty in feasibility of solution• Reduced risk of delivery troubles• Better predictability of solution cost• Less budget overrun
Source: Raymond Slot, PhD Thesis, 2010.
“Architecture is about the important stuff.Whatever that is.”
The Architecting MicrocycleWorkflow for architectural decision making
7
Identify & prioritize
architectural concerns
Research possible
strategies
Decide best fitting
strategy
Architectural concerns(backlog)
Architecturaldecisions
8
Cone of Uncertainty
Evolution of amount of uncertainty (in solution life cycle)
Cone is narrowed by:• Research• Decision making
Architecture narrows the cone by researching strategies to architectural concerns and making architectural decisions.
Source: Steve McConnell, Barry Boehm
t
9
Architectural Decisions throughout the life cycle
All architectural decisions are based on incomplete information…
…and the highest impact decisions are taken while the least factual knowledge is available.
Source: Philippe Kruchten
Architecture decision impact Available knowledge
# Decisions
Cone of uncertaintyt
The life and times of an architecture
10
t
Birth: from stakeholder need to solution conceptGraduation: making the business case
Marriage: committing to the architectureCareer and home life
Children: revolutionary changes
Legacy
BirthSolution concept
Typical concerns
• What do the stakeholders need?• How can we give it to them?
11
Typical output
• Business goals• Scope• First solution concept
BirthSolution concept
Typical concerns
• What do the stakeholders need?• How can we give it to them?
Traditional
• Project Brief• Inception• Solution Outline
12
Typical output
• Business goals• Scope• First solution concept
Agile
• Capture• Funnel
GraduationBusiness case
Typical concerns
• Is it worth doing this?• Are we confident risks and costs are
under control?
13
Typical output
• Business case• Solution design• Delivery concept
GraduationBusiness case
Typical concerns
• Is it worth doing this?• Are we confident risks and costs are
under control?
Traditional
• Project Initiation Documentation• Elaboration• Architectural Design
14
Typical output
• Business case• Solution design• Delivery concept
Agile
• Value statement, ROI• Refine understanding• Analysis
Tip: document this evidence in architectural views that address uncertainty-related concerns:• Operational View• Delivery Breakdown View
15
Graduation
• Stakeholder(s) funding solution (project/epic) agree that uncertainty in risk and cost is below a threshold
• Architecture is (part of) evidence that threshold is reached
Cone of uncertainty
Budget approval
Acceptable risk threshold
Graduation: making the business case
t
All architecture documentation methods use views• ISO 42010, TOGAF, Archimate, 4 + 1, ‘Views and Beyond’
• Viewpoints address concerns per stakeholder (group)• Budget go/no-go concerns are common across traditional and agile contexts
GraduationViews and Viewpoints
Graduation ViewsOperational View: Context Diagram
Context Diagram:Solution in its operational environment
• “What’s in scope and what is not?” Solution Boundary
• “What external systems/actors?” Interface Overview
Source: Wikimedia
Graduation ViewsOperational View: Operational Decomposition
Operational Decomposition:Components interact in running solution
• “How do run-time elements depend on each other?”
• “How does information flow through the solution?”
Transient Solutions:• “How is the system operated now?”
CMO, As-is• “How will it run after transformation?”
FMO, To-beSource: ibm.com
Graduation ViewsSolution Breakdown Structure
“How can the solution be decomposed to manage delivery?”
Basis for organizational allocation, solution costing, project planning / story decomposition
Solution
SW systemMaintenanceorganization
Supporting system
modifications
Hosting
App 1 Lib 5
Solution Breakdown Structure
MarriageCommitting to the architecture
Typical concerns
• How confident are we about this architecture?
• What are the alternatives?
20
Typical output
• Comparative / trade-off analysis• Elaborated solution design• Design review
MarriageCommitting to the architecture
Typical concerns
• How confident are we about this architecture?
• What are the alternatives?
Traditional
• Project Initiation Documentation• Elaboration• Critical Design Review
21
Typical output
• Comparative / trade-off analysis• Elaborated solution design• Design review
Agile
• Refine understanding• Review, evaluation• Evaluation
22
Marriage
Cost of change to architecture quickly grows after a point in time, e.g.:• Size of realization refactoring• Divestments in training,
development environment, third party products/commitments
t
Cost of architecture change
Cone of uncertainty
Realized solution
Marriage: committing to the architecture
Tip: organize independent architecture assessment before crossing this line• Cf. Kahneman “Outside View”• E.g. ATAM
Business Criticality
23
Marriage preparationHow many architectural decisions before commitment?
Cost of architecture change
Source: Barry Boehm
Cost of architecture change# Decisions
# Decisions
Marriage
Size
Volatility
Higher
Lower
Lower
Higher
Smaller/Simpler Larger/Complexer
Marriage
Career and Home LifeFulfilling the architecture
tCone of uncertainty
Realized solution
Career: fulfilling the architecture
25
Career and Home LifeFulfilling the architecture
Cone of uncertainty
Realized solution
Career: fulfilling the architecture• Ensure realization of all elements• Based on Delivery Breakdown View
Completeness
• Verify NFRs and other architectural requirements
Testing
• Architect involved in integration• Minimize inter-team dependencies
Coherence
• Architecture views, wallpaper, telling, training
Communication
• Identify & manage (new) architectural concerns
Risk Management
Def.of Done/Project plan
Backlog/Project plan
Team organization
Risk logConcern register
Team organization
t
26
Career and home lifeHealth and Debt Control
What’s in your backlog? (or Work Breakdown Structure / Project Portfolio / Change Requests)
New featuresAdded
functionality
Architectural,Structural features
Defects Technical Debt
Visible Invisible
PositiveValue
NegativeValue
Source: Philippe Kruchten
Health and Debt Control using SCRUM & RCDA
27
Health and Debt ControlArchitecture Roadmapping with Just Enough Anticipation
Just Enough Anticipation achieved by:
• Dependency Analysis• Technical Debt Control• Economic Reasoning
28
Source: Nanette Brown, Rod Nord, Ipek Ozkaya
ChildrenRevolutionary Changes
29
Typical concerns
• What has changed since the previous generation?
• Prevent damage to existing status quo
Typical output
• Business goals• Scope• First solution concept
ChildrenRevolutionary Changes
30
Typical concerns
• What has changed since the previous generation?
• Prevent damage to existing status quo
Traditional
• Project Brief• Inception• Solution Outline
Typical output
• Business goals• Scope• First solution concept
Agile
• Capture• Funnel
Our commitment to youWe approach every engagement with one objective in mind: to help clients succeed
Spare slides follow
Architectural Decision MakingTiming of architectural decisionsCertainty of correct architectural decision depends on knowledge:• relative cost of the alternative solutions• value and impact on the business• delivery times
Timing architectural decision is balancing risk, cost and delivery time:• too little information risk of not meeting key requirements• waiting too long project delays, wasted resources
Key skills of Solution Architect:• timing of architectural decisions• making decisions based on incomplete information• dealing with the resulting risks
There's an art of knowing when.Never try to guess.
Toast until it smokes and thentwenty seconds less.
- Pat Hein
t
RiskCost of delay
Cost + Risk
Decisiontime
Solution CostingExample: Package Implementation
1. Configuration2. Custom built functionality3. Core module(s) / standard functionality4. External interfaces5. Internal interfaces6. Data
33
Solution CostingExample: Package Implementation Decisions
34
D1 – Choice of ERP Vendor: TBQD2 – Core modules selected: Finance & OrderD3 – Extend Order module with bespoke Order Routing functionalityD4 – Extend Finance module with bespoke Internal Clearing functionalityD5 – Build custom functionality using Mill platformD6 – Payments will be handled by partner PayUpD7 – Order related e-mails sent through existing mail distribution serverD8 – Order Routing module will interface with Fleet mgt partner AphlasD9 – Data to be converted: Ledger, Catalog, Stock (no open orders)D10 – Selected ETL tool: Barn
Solution CostingExample: Operational View
35
TBQ Finance Core
Internal Clearing (custom)
TBQ Order Core
Order Routing (custom)
TBQ Solution
PayUp
Aphlas
Users
Solution CostingExample: Construction View
36
TBQ Finance Core
Internal Clearing (custom)
TBQ Order Core
Order Routing (custom)
TBQ Solution
PayUp
Aphlas
Barn
Barn
CatalogStock
Mill
Mill
Ledger
Solution CostingExample: Package Implementation SBS
Package Implementation
Configuration
Finance config
Order config
Custom built functionality
Internal Clearing
Order Routing
Core modules
Finance
Order
External interfaces
Payments
Fleet
Internal interfaces
Finance Order
Data
Converted Ledger
Converted Catalog
Converted Stock
37
Solution CostingExample: Package Implementation Cost Drivers
38
Deliverable Elements Typical cost drivers (realization) Parameter examples
Configuration Solution complexity #Config parameters
Organization complexity #Stakeholder workshops
Custom built functionality Functional size #Use cases, function pts
Implementation technology API callsProgramming language
Core module(s) / standard functionality
Vendor IP pricing Modules, options#Users, #Transactions…
External interfaces Interface complexity I/F protocol, technologyNon-functional reqs
Commercial availability Vendor pricing
Internal interfaces Interface complexity I/F protocol, technologyNon-functional reqs
Data Data size #TB, #tables, #records
Data quality Pollution, redundancy
Data compatibility (ETL) tooling availability