the local group and galactic evolution
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Local Group and Galactic Evolution
I The Local Group
I Satellite Galaxies
I Cepheid Variables
I Tides and the Roche Limit
I Local Spirals
I Chemical Evolution
I Dwarf Galaxies
I Future of the Local Group
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 2: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Local Group
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 3: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Local Group
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 4: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Local Group
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 5: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Large Magellanic Cloud
HI gas Hα
S Dor
opticalIR - 24µm
⇐= 10 or 8.5 kpc =⇒ ⇐= 7 or 6.0 kpc =⇒
LargeMagellanicCloud
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 6: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Bulge Large Magellanic Cloud
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 7: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Magellanic Clouds
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 8: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Cepheid Variables
MV = −3.525 log(P/d) + 2.88(V − Ic )0−2.80− 1.05AV
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 9: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Pulsational Frequency
The Euler equation of motion for a surface layer of mass m and radius R
md2R
dt2= −GMm
R2− 1
ρ
∂p
∂r.
Use V = 1/ρ and −Vdp = pdV − pV = pdV = 4πR2dr (p = 0 at thetop of the layer (surface) and V = 0 at the bottom). In equilibrium, onehas GMm/R2
0 = 4πR20 p0. With perturbation R → R0 + δR; p → p0 + δp
md2(R + δR)
dt2= − GMm
(R + δR)2+ 4π(R + δR)2(p + δp)
md2δR
dt2=
(2GMm
R30
+ 8πR0p0
)δR + 4πR2
0δp
d2δR
dt2=
GMR3
0
(4− 3γ)δR
We used pV γ = constant or pR3γ = constant or δp/p0 = −3γδR/R0.This equation has a harmonic solution δR = A sinωt if γ > 4/3.
ω =
√(3γ − 4)
GMR3
0
'
√GMR3
0
∼√ρ.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 10: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Pulsational Instability
An instability will occur if opacityincreases with compression(temperature), which is not normallythe case. Normal stellar opacity is ofthe Kramer’s type κ ∝ ρT−3.5 andρ ∝ T 3 in adiabatic matter. Thusκ ∝ ρ−1/6 and decreases uponcompression.
In a partial ionization zone,H↔ H+ + e−,He↔ He+ + e−,He+ ↔ He++ + e−, the temperatureincreases less because of the ionizationenergy sink. This is the key to thekappa mechanism.
V
I A→ B: opacity increases during compression
I B → C : heat absorbed ∆SBC = ∆QBC/Thot
I C → D: opacity decreases during expansion
I D → A: heat released ∆SDA = ∆QDA/Tcold
∆QBC + ∆QDA = ∆SBC (Thot − Tcold )/Thot > 0
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 11: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Period-Luminosity Relation
I log L = 3.5 logM+ a
I log L = 2 log R + 4 log Teff
I log P = − 12 logM+ 3
2 log R + b
I log Teff ∼ − 120 log L
I log P = ( 34 −
17 + 3
20 ) log L− 3 log Teff + b + a7
I log P = 0.76 log L + b + a7
I MV = − 2.50.76 log P + c = −3.3 log P + c
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 12: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies
I At least asluminous asglobular clusters
I Surfacebrightness 1% ofLMC
I > 10 in LocalGroup
I No young stars,no gas
I Stars of a widerange of ages3− 10 Gyr
I Low metallicities
Z = 0.02Z
3 Gyr
7
15
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 13: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Galaxy Encounters
I Weak or distant encountersI Flyby with associated tidesI Satellite orbit decay due to
dynamical frictionI Tidal evaporation of orbiting
satelliteI Tidal or gravitational shocks
I Strong or close encountersI MergersI Global gravitational effects
become important
I Analytic cases (mergers can onlybe treated numerically)
I Dynamical friction (smallsystem moving through a largerone)
I Tidal evaporation(Jacobi/Roche limit)
I Slow encounters (adiabaticapproximation)
I Fast (shocking) encounters(impulse approximation)
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 14: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Distant Weak Encounters and Drag
Use the impulse approximation, ignoringthe deviation in the stellar paths. Theimpact parameter is b. The perpindicularpull of star m on star M is GmM/r2
times b/r , with r2 = b2 + V 2t2:
F⊥(t) =GmMb
(b2 + V 2t2)3/2=MdV⊥
dt
Deflection angle:
θ =∆V⊥
V=
1
MV
∫ +∞
−∞F⊥dt =
2Gm
bV 2
The encounter has symmetry about thevector of closest approach, the line θ/2backwards from the original perpendicularimpact parameter vector. Newton’s 3rdlaw says m∆v = M∆V .
Drag is caused by the component of theforce parallel and backwards to M’smotion. Then
∆t∆Fdrag = −m∆v|| = −2GMm
bV
θ
2
= −2G 2M2m
b2V 3.
Fdrag =
∫ ∫nV ∆Fdragdt2πbdb
= −4πG 2M2nm ln Λ
V 2
Λ =bmax
bmin
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 15: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Distant Weak Encounters and DragThe basic idea is that a moving massattracts objects to it, but because ofits motion, the objects tend to gatherbehind the mass, pulling it backwards.
I Open clusters: ln Λ ≈ 6
I Globular clusters: ln Λ ≈ 11
I Large elliptical galaxy: ln Λ ≈ 22
I Galaxy clusters: ln Λ ≈ 7
Allowing for a range of velocities(Chandrasekhar friction formula):
Fdrag = −4πG 2M2m
V 2ln Λ
∫ V
0
f (v)d3v
I V << v , use f (v) ≈ f (0),resembles Stokes law for motionthrough a viscous fluid.
Fdrag = −16
3π2G 2M2mf (0)V ln Λ
I V >> v , all stars contribute,drag decreases with V :
Fdrag = −4πG 2M2nmV−2 ln Λ
I Maxwellian with dispersion σ,X = V /(σ
√2):
Fdrag = −4πG 2M2nmV−2 ln Λ
×[erf (X )− 2Xe−X 2
/√π]
' −4πG 2M2nmV−2 ln Λ[1− e−0.6X 2
]J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 16: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Applications of Dynamical Friction
I Satellite in circular orbitTake an isothermal galaxy:ρ(r) = V 2
c /(4πGr2), σ = Vc/√
2or X = 1, L =MVc r
Fdrag = −0.43G (M/r)2 lnλ
dL/dT = Fdrag r =−0.43G (M2/r) ln Λ =MVcdr/dt
tinfall = Vc r2i /(0.86GM ln Λ)
Example: globular cluster orbitingMilky WayM = 106M,Vc = 250 km/s,bmax = ri = 2 kpc:
tinfall ' 2.6× 1010 yr
I Massive galaxy encounterM = 1010M, ri = 20 kpc,V = Vc :
tinfall ' 2× 108 yr ∼ orbit period.
I LMCM≈ 2× 1010M, ri = 60 kpc:
tinfall ≈ 3× 109 yr.
Why is LMC still there? Not on acircular orbit; LMC has beenbound to SMC in elliptic(e = 0.2) orbit. Their orbit hasdecayed by factor 2 but willtidally separate when approachingMilky Way within 30 kpc.They will settle in Galactic centerin 1010 yr.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 17: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Tidal Limit
Satellite and galaxy are fixed in arotating frame. A star’s energyE = V 2/2 + Φ is not conserved; butEJ = V 2/2 + Φeff is.
Φeff (r) = Φ(r)− |Ω× r|2/2
Along a line connecting m and Mwith origin at m:
Φeff (x) = − GM|D−x| −
Gm|x| = Ω2
2 (x − D)2
Turning points:xJ ' ±D(m/3M)1/3
is the Jacobi (or tidal, Roche, Hill)radius.
For an isothermal potential,xJ ' ±D(m/2M)1/3.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 18: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Satellite Evaporation and Destruction
Satellite star with EJ moving awayfrom satellite has decreasing V , andturns around when EJ = Φeff .
If EJ > Φeff (rJ ) the star is lost(evaporated). This differs from slowevaporation caused by scattering ofstars to V > Ve . Even bound stars(E < 0) can have EJ > Φeff (rJ ).
A satellite approaching a galaxy hasdecreasing rJ and Φeff (rJ ) so it losesmore and more stars.Since most stars are only marginallybound (N(E ) peaks near E = 0), asmall decrease in Φeff (rJ ) can result inthe loss of many stars.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 19: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Slow and Fast Encounters
Although orbits of many starssignificantly affected by a tidalencounter, the tightly bound ones(Porb << tencounter ) are not. The tidalfield slowly changes and these starsrespond adiabatically.
The opposite extreme is a tidal shock:Porb >> tencounter orVinternal << ∆Vencounter . These starsdon’t move during the encounter, sono change in PE. They feel an impulseand ∆ KE. These stars are thusheated.
System must expand and cool inresponse. A two step process (recallEo,f = - KEo,f ):
I shock: KEi = KEo + ∆KE,Ei =Eo + ∆ KE = - KEo + ∆ KE
I relaxation: Ef = Ei , KEf =KEo −∆KE
Although shock heated system by∆KE, during relaxation it cooled by−2∆KE and expanded.
Some stars received enough energy tounbind and evaporate. Repeatedshocks can disintegrate a cluster.
If the encounter is distant, the systemis left elongated, long axis pointing tothe point of closest approach.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 20: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Examples
I Open clusters are shocked bypassage of dense molecular clouds;most evaporated after 5× 108 yr.
I Globular clusters are shocked bypassing through disk.If σ = 5 km/s, r = 10 pc,V⊥ = 170 km/s, R = 3.5 kpc:tdisrupt ≈ 6× 109 yr.
I Galaxies in clusters (galaxyharassment): disks are heated andthicken; spiral arm formation issuppressed; galaxies appear toevolve to earlier Hubble type.Stars and dark matter expand andare lost but join the cluster.Gas loses angular momentum andfalls to center, triggering starformation (starburst).
I Ring galaxies are formed fromtidal shocks. A perturber passesrapidly through center of disk,inducing an inward ∆Vr . Setsup a synchronized epicyclicmotion, results in an expandingcircular density wave or ring.These trigger star formation.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 21: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Andromeda Galaxy
I Large than Milky Way: 50% moreluminous, hR is double,V (R) ∼ 260 km/s (about 20-30%larger). Twice the number ofglobular clusters (300).
I Bulge is larger than Milky Way’s,with about 30-40% of theluminosity. Stars are older than afew Gyr and relatively rich inheavy elements.
I Has a compact, semi-stellarnucleus, with two concentrationsof light 2pc (0.5 arcsec) apart.One is a star cluster, one is ablack hole of 4× 106M.Nucleus is free of gas and dust.
I Metal-poor globular clusters havedeeply plunging trajectories.
I Most stars within a few kpc ofdisk are not metal-poor, as if thebulge was overflowing. These areabout 6 Gyrs old and may be theremnant of a merger with ametal-rich (and thereforemassive) galaxy.
I A “ring of fire” circles at 10 kpcand contains most of the youngstars. Marked by HII regions andCO emission.
I Less pronounced, and tightlywound, spiral features makes thisan Sb galaxy, compared to MilkyWay (SBc).
I 4− 6× 106M of HI, 50% morethan Milky Way.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 22: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
M31
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 23: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Formation of Local Group
Tidal torques induce slow rotation
Denser clumps collapse, and are already clustered.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 24: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Galactic Chemical EvolutionEvolution of total massM(t) =Mg (t) +M∗(t) in terms ofinflows f (t) and outflows o(t):
dM/dt = f − o
In the Closed Box Model, f (t) = o(t).The evolution of the gas mass Mg (t)
dMg/dt = −Ψ + E + f − o
in terms of the Star Formation Rate(SFR, Ψ(t)) and the rate of massejection by dying stars E (t).A star of mass M is created at timet − τM and dies at time t > τM,leaving a remnant of mass CM.
E (t) =
∫ MU
Mt
(M−CM)Ψ(t−τM)ξ(M)dM
The Initial Mass Function (IMF) is ξ.Integrate over stars dying at time t,i.e., from Mt to the upper limit of theIMF MU .The evolution of species i with massMgZi in the gas is
dMgZi/dt = −ΨZi +Ei + fZi,f −oZi,o
The rate of stellar ejection of species i :
Ei (t) =
∫ MU
Mt
Yi (M)Ψ(t−τM)ξ(M)dM
where Yi (M) is the stellar yield andcould depend on t.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 25: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Inputs
Stellar lifetimes strongly decreasewith M.Stellar remnants include whitedwarfs, neutron stars and blackholes. Their masses depend onthe extent of mass loss by winds.Ejected mass fractions increasewith M.
Stellar yields are better expressedin terms of net yields
yi (M) = Yi (M)− Zi (M− CM),
the newly created mass of i minuswhat was originally there.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 26: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Initial Mass FunctionLuminosity functionf (L) = dN/dL and M− Lrelation for MS starsφ(L) = dM/dL. The present-daymass function (PDMF, F (M)) is
F (M) = dN/dM = f φ.
The IMF can be derived if the SFRis known as it is an integral overtime of the star creation rate ΦΨ.If the IMF doesn’t depend on t:
ξ(M) = F (M)/
∫ T
T−τMΨ(t)dt.
Return Mass Fraction R is massfraction of a stellar generationreturned to ISM
R =
∫ MU
MT
(M− CM)ξ(M)dM
R = 0.28 (S), 0.30 (K + S),0.34 (C + S)
Two simplified cases:
I Short-lived stars
ξ(M) =F (M)
Ψ0τM.
I Eternal stars
ξ(M) =F (M)
〈Ψ〉τM
where 〈Ψ〉 = T−1∫ T
0Ψ(t)dt is
the past average SFR.
Salpeter formula (α = 2.35)
ξ(M) = dN/dM = ξoM−α
1 =
∫ MU
ML
ξ(M)MdM
ξo = ξ0Mα−1
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 27: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
IMF and Its Evolution
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 28: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Star Formation Rate
Schmidt (1959): Ψ(t) = νMg (t)N
N ∼ 2 theoretically if referring to mass densityN ∼ 1.4 observationally if referring to surface density, more easilymeasured.Kennicutt (1998): Ψ ∝ Σ/τdyn where τdyn = R/V (R).
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 29: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Analytical Chemical Evolution
Analytical solutions are possible if Instantaneous RecyclingApproximation (IRA) is adopted (Schmidt 1963). Stars are either
I “eternal”, M <M, τM ≥ T ∼ 12 Gyr, orI “dead at birth”, M <M, τM ≈ 0.
With IRA, Ψ(t − τM) = Ψ(t) 6= f (M). Define pi to be the amount of icreated by a stellar generation per unit mass of “eternal” stars andremnants:
pi = (1− R)−1
∫ MU
MT
yi (M)ξ(M)dM,
For a closed box, IRA model
dMg
dt= −(1− R)Ψ(t),
dMgZi
dt= Ψ(t)(1− R)(pi − Zi ).
Eliminating Ψ and t, and setting Mg (t = 0) =M:
MgdZi = −pidMg ; Zi = Zi,0 + pi lnMMg
Assuming a Schmidt Law with N = 1:
Mg =Me−ν(1−R)t , Zi = Zi,0 + piν(1− R)t.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 30: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Models
Parameters of the model should be constrained to produce thepresent-day metallicity. Assuming Zi,0 = 0, R ' 0.3, non-IRA modelsimply N = 1 and ν = 1.2 Gyr−1. IRA predicts
Mg (T )/M = e−ν(1−R)T ' 4× 10−5
compared to the observed value Mg (T ) ' 0.2M. Also
p = −(Z − Z0)/ ln(Mg/M) ' 0.6Z ' 0.012
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 31: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Metallicity Evolution
Nearby F and G stars
b v > 80 km/sr v < 80 km/s
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 32: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Metallicity Distribution
Mg =Me−[Z(t)−Z(0)]/p.
Where the gas abundance is high relative to stars (outer disk regions) themetallicity is low.
Disk gas in M33
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 33: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Metal Abundances in Bulge Giant Stars
Mass of stars with metallicity between Z and Z + ∆Z is
dM∗dZ
∆Z =Me−[Z(t)−Z(0)]/p∆Z .
Consistency indicates bulge retained all its gas, turning it into stars.
p = 0.7Z, G and K giant stars in Galactic bulge.
dM∗/dZ dM∗/d ln Z
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 34: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Metal Abundances in Solar-Neighborhood Dwarf Stars
Closed box model with IRA andZ (0) = 0 suggests for solarneighborhood
Z (T ) ' Z ' p ln(MMg
)
≈p ln(50
13),
p ' 0.74Z.
Fraction of metal-poor stars withZ < Z/4:
M∗(< 0.25Z)
M∗(< 0.7Z)=
1− e−0.25Z/p
1− e−0.7Z/p
' 0.52.
Observed fraction ∼ 25%. Knownas the G-dwarf problem.
If Z (0) = Z0 6= 0, Z0 ∼ 0.15Z:Z − Z0 ' p ln (M/Mg ) and p ' 0.63Z.
M∗(< 0.25Z)
M∗(< 0.7Z)=
1− e(Z0−0.25Z)/p
1− e(Z0−0.7Z)/p
' 0.25.
d[N
(Z<
Z′ )/
N(Z<
ZT
)]/
dln
Z
Pre-enrichment: Z0 = 0.08Z
Infall: exponential τ = 7 Gyr
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 35: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Evidence For Infall
There is another inconsistency with the closed box model.
Note Ψ ∼ 3− 5M yr−1 in the solar neighborhood.
Present disk gas mass is Mg ∼ 5− 10× 109M.
Remaining epoch of star formation should last no longer thanMg/[Ψ(1− R)] ∼ 1.4− 4.8 Gyr.
Why do we live so near the end of star formation?
Additional gas must be accumulating in the Galactic disk.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 36: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Models with Infall
If it is assumed gas infalls with a metallicity Z0 = Z (t = 0) and an infallrate proportional to star formation rate:
f (t) = Λ(1− R)Ψ(t).
The parameter Λ ≤ 1; if Λ = 1 then Mg (t) =Mg (0).
Mg (t)
Mg (0)=
(1− [Z (t)− Z0]
Λ
p
)Λ−1−1
, Z (t) =p
Λ
(1−
[Mg (t)
Mg (0)
]Λ/(1−Λ)).
When Z = Z0 + p/Λ, the maximum metallicity, Mg → 0. Introducing
µ(t) =M(t)−M(0)
M(0)= Λ
1− R
M(0)
∫ t
0
Ψ(t ′)dt ′ =Mg (t)−M(0)
M(0)
Λ
Λ− 1,
Z (t) = Z0 + pΛ−1(
1−[1− (Λ−1 − 1)µ(t)
]Λ/(1−Λ)), Λ 6= 1
Z (t) = Z0 + p[1− e−µ(t)
]. Λ = 1
N(Z < Z ′) =
∫ t′
0
Ψ(t)dt =M(0)
Λ(1− R)µ(t ′),
N(Z < Z ′)
N(Z < Z (T ))=µ(t ′)
µ(T )
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 37: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Evolution of the Solar Neighborhood (the Thin Disk)
Assume exponentially decreasing infall with timescale τf = 7 Gyr andMg (0) = Z (0) = 0. Use surface densities:
I Infall normalized to observed value:
ΣT =
∫ T
0
f (t)dt = Σg + Σ∗ ' 12 + 38 = 50M pc−2
f (t) = Ae−t/τf =⇒ ΣT = Aτf
(1− e−t/τf
)=⇒ A = (50/7)
(1− e−12/7
)−1
' 8.7M pc−2 Gyr−1
I Assume Schmidt SFR Ψ(t) = νΣg (t) and Σg (T )/ΣT (T ) = 0.24:dΣg
dt= −(1− R)Ψ(t) + Ae−t/τf , Σg (t) =
A
αe−t/τf
(1− e−αt
),
α = (1− R)ν − τ−1f =⇒ ν ' 0.32 Gyr−1, Ψ(T ) ' 3.8M pc−2 Gyr−1
Constrain to solar metallicity Z = Z (t = 7.5 Gyr) ' 0.02:
Z (t) = pν1− R
α
eαt − αt − 1
eαt − 1=⇒ p = 1.17Z
N(Z < Z ′) =
∫ t′
0
Ψdt =Aν
α
[α +
e−t′/τf
τf− (1− R)νe−(1−R)νt′
].
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 38: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Evolution of the Solar Neighborhood (the Thin Disk)
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 39: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Oxygen Evolution
Oxygen is characteristic of a primary α−nucleus, originating primarily inType II supernovae.Iron is also primary, produced in a 2:1 proportion by Type I and Type IIsupernovae, but the former don’t ”turn on” until [Fe/H]> −1.5.
halo
thin disk
thick disk
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 40: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
CNO Evolution
Carbon and oxygen are characteristicof primary nuclei, originating primarilyin Type II supernovae.Nitrogen thought to originate fromHot Bottom Burning in AGB stars,but the most massive of these (8M)have lifetimes too long to explain itsprimary character.It is also produced as a secondarynucleus.Now known to be a primary nucleusproduced by rotationally-inducedmixing in massive stars, fromH-burning of C and O produced insidethe star.Requires low-metallicity stars to berotating muich faster (800 km/s) thanhigh-metallicity stars (300 km/s).
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 41: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Halo Evolution and Hierarchical Galaxy Formation
The metallicity distribution of halofield stars is well fit by a closed box,IRA model dN/d ln Z ∝ (Z/p)e−Z/p.This peaks at Z = p. [Fe/H]= −1.6implies p ' Z/40.
The reduced yield could be explainedby an outflow during halo formation,with a rate 8 times the SFR.
It could also be interpreted as due tohierarchical galaxy formation. Thehalo metallicities are lower by morethan 3 times than those of nearbygalaxies of the same mass as the halo.Those small galaxies show a linearrelation between stellar mass andmetallicity which results from massloss: hot supernova ejecta escape moreeasily from smaller mass galaxies.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 42: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The R-Process
Elements heavier than Feare produced by protoncapture (p) or by neutroncapture, either slow (s)or rapid (s).
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 43: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Element Evolution
Primary α-elements show lessscatter and small trendswith metallicity. Secondary r-processelements show large scatter.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 44: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
R-Process and Heirarchical Galaxy Formation
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 45: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Dwarf Spheroidals and Metallicity Distributions
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 46: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Neutron Star Mergers and the R-Process
Mergers have minimum evolutionlifetimes of 10-100 Myrs.But high r-process abundance canbe made in small metallicity places.Different places have different [Fe/H].[Fe/H] is decoupled from time.
Ishimaru, Wanajo & Prantzos 2010
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 47: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Dwarf Galaxies
I Types:I Dwarf Spheroidals - diffuse and devoid of
gas and star formationI Dwarf Ellipticals - devoid of gas and star
formationI Dwarf Irregulars -diffuse and abundant
gas and star formation
I Properties:I All have horizontal branch stars, i.e.,
some stars older than 10 Gyr. This ispredicted by cold dark matter.
I M32 is anomalous, with extremely highcentral surface density. Perhaps the coreremnant of a larger galaxy with amassive black hole at its center
I Metallicities in dwarf galaxies correlateswith their masses. This suggestsoutflow, caused by star formation, whichis easier the more shallow is thegravitational potential.
I Gas in dwarf irregularsextends beyond stellar disk
HI gas on R band image of IC10
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 48: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
M33
Wolf-Rayet
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5
![Page 49: The Local Group and Galactic Evolution](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022052107/628831e7ca6233648c499b03/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
History of the Local Group
Treat the Local Group as the galaxiesM31 (M) and the Milky Way (m).They are separated by r = 770 kpcand approaching each otherdr/dt = −120 km/s.
It can be shown that the equation ofmotion for two arbitrarily massiveobjects (m,M) is the same as for asmall mass m moving in the field of amuch larger mass M+ m. In thiscase, the relative positions of the twomasses satisifies
d2r
dt2=
L2z
r3− G (M+ m)
r2
dr
dt= ±
√2G (M+ m)
r− L2
z
r2
Since dr/dt < 0, we use − sign.
Pericenter is reached when dr/dt = 0or rmin = L2
z/[2G (M+ m)].Using rmin = 0 gives M+ m >(dr/dt)2r/(2G ) ∼ 1.3× 1012M.There is a cyclic solution
r = a(1− e cos η)
t =a3/2(η − e sin η)√
G (M+ m)
where a = L2z/[G (M+ m)(1− e)].
Galaxies began moving apart at t = 0(η = 0) and are now approaching.η = π(2π) corresponds to apocenter(pericenter). M+ m, η, a can bedetermined from r , dr/dt, t if e isknown. We find a minimumM+ m >∼ 5.1× 1012M when e = 1,12 times larger than we estimated fromcircular velocities. Pericenter time ist2π = 2πa3/2/
√G (M+ m) = 15 Gyr.
J.M. Lattimer AST 346, Galaxies, Part 5