the measure of american democracy

29
The Measure of American Democracy Charles Stewart III June 1, 2012

Upload: affrica

Post on 24-Feb-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Measure of American Democracy. Charles Stewart III June 1, 2012. Who won?. Who won? How would we know?. Florida 2000 reminds us of what V.O. Key once wrote:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Measure of American Democracy

The Measure of American Democracy

Charles Stewart III

June 1, 2012

Page 2: The Measure of American Democracy

• Who won?

Page 3: The Measure of American Democracy

• Who won?

• How would we know?

Page 4: The Measure of American Democracy

• Florida 2000 reminds us of what V.O. Key once wrote:

Over most of the United States, the conduct of elections is the most neglected and primitive branch of our public administration . . . .

V.O. Key, Southern Politics in State and Nation (1949

Page 5: The Measure of American Democracy
Page 6: The Measure of American Democracy
Page 7: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

Page 8: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

Page 9: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

Page 10: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

What do the data say?

Page 11: The Measure of American Democracy

What problems were unearthed in 2000?

Page 12: The Measure of American Democracy

What problems were unearthed in 2000?: Florida

1. Recount law and practice were a mess (leading to a near constitutional crisis)

2. Old voting machines (lost votes)

3. Poor ballot design (confused voters)

4. Poor registration systems (led to voters being turned away)

Page 13: The Measure of American Democracy

What problems were unearthed in 2000? Nationwide

1. Nationwide recount law and practice were a mess (leading to a near constitutional crisis)

2. Old voting machines (lost votes)

3. Poor ballot design (confused voters)

4. Poor registration systems (led to voters being turned away)

5. People registering by mail (possibility of fraud)

6. Physically disabled hindered from voting independently

7. No federal champion for improving elections

8. Felon disenfranchisement

Page 14: The Measure of American Democracy

What problems were unearthed in 2000?: The magnitude

Data sources: state election divisions; Current Population Survey, Voting and Registration Supplement

Page 15: The Measure of American Democracy

The response: The Help America Vote Act (HAVA)

Problem Solution(s)Old voting machines $billions for new machines

Lever machines & punch cards bannedPoor ballot design EAC mandate for research

Poor registration systems Mandates for new computerized systemsProvisional ballots as “fail safe”

People registering by mail ID requirement for most first-time voters

No federal champion EAC

Page 16: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

• Yes, definitely– Voting machines

• Yes, somewhat– Voter registration systems

• No– Designing better ways to resolve election disputes– Improving polling place practices– Spurring research into best practices– Improving access for the disabled

Page 17: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

• Q: How do we know?

Page 18: The Measure of American Democracy

Have elections gotten better in the U.S. since 2000?

• Q: How do we know?

• A: Data analysis

Page 19: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in voting machines

Page 20: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in voting machines

• Election data from elections divisions

Page 21: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in voting machines

• Election data from elections divisions

• Voting machine data from the EAC and Election Data Services

Page 22: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in voting machines

• Election data from elections divisions

• Voting machine data from the EAC and Election Data Services

• Net result: Fewer lost votes due to voting machines

– 1 million fewer in 2004

– 1.3 million fewer in 2008

Page 23: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in registration lists

• Data from the Voting and Registration Supplement of the Current Population Study

Page 24: The Measure of American Democracy

Improvements in registration lists

• Data from the Voting and Registration Supplement of the Current Population Study

• Fewer people failing to vote due to registration problems

– 0.92% of registered voters in 2000

– 0.74% in 2004

– 0.57% in 2008

Page 25: The Measure of American Democracy

We’re doing better.Do we feel better?

Page 26: The Measure of American Democracy

We’re doing better.Do we feel better?

Year Egotropic Sociotropic2000 CBS/NYT; LAT Pew; NAES2002 None2004 CBS/NYT; Pew (2); ABC/WP

(2); NAES (2)CBS/NYT; Pew; ABC

2006 Pew (3); CNN; Fox; ABS/WP CNN; Gallup/USAT; Pew

2008 Gallup/USAT; Pew (2); SPAE Gallup/USAT; ANES; CBS/NYT; Pew; NAES

2010 Pew Pew

Source: Roper Center (mostly)

Page 27: The Measure of American Democracy

We’re doing better.Do we feel better?

Page 28: The Measure of American Democracy

We’re doing better.Do we feel better?

Page 29: The Measure of American Democracy