the method of cloud-based learning
TRANSCRIPT
WG iLearner: The Method of Cloud-based learning Brussels, 18 Nov. 2016
education and learning has
changed …
…so it must do better than
this…
… a good education demands
a good approach …
… so let’ hear The Story of John … • John enters the school door, has a look if there is
anything new in the intercultural area, greets his friends who are doing a small game in the playground section and checks his mobile device.
Learning environment • Relaxed
• No wallls
• New furniture
• Connection with nature
• Connection with other learners
• Diverse
The Story of John
• There he finds that one of his colleagues posted a question to their professor, still being unanswered. So he decides to meet members of another group in the cantine, joining them for an orange juice. They had already advanced, so they indeed can help.
• John and his colleagues continue to get data from the open data cloud, using the free open-source software to analyze and compile it, preparing a cool interactive visualization.
Learning process • Critical thinking
• Flipped classroom
• Data management
• Open source software
• Peer learning
• Tutorials from learners to learners
• Privacy awareness
• Critical thinking
• Prepared for the real working environment
• Time-wise and content-wise organized
• Creative
… The Story of John …
• After two hours the chair reports to John’s device that he is sitting since two hours. There is where Theresa comes into the learning story. She is a trainer for yoga and guides the team to the relaxation room, showing them some new exercises to relax their neck muscles.
• Right after they finished their exercise they hear the “bell of good ideas”. They move to the schools amphitheater and wait for the announcement. One of their colleagues just had the idea of using a 3D-pen to create individual models of chocolate for their christmas party
European Schoolnet, the Future
Classroom Lab (FCL)
create
interact
present
investigate
exchange develop
RHIZO Lyceum Kortrijk, Belgium
RHIZO Lyceum Kortrijk, Belgium
… The Story of John
• Then the team goes back to work. They proceed very well, achieving the “flow” state. Suddenly the system warns “15 minutes left until automatic shutdown for today”. They concentrate and finish their work, having the evening for their outdoor non-school related activities and games.
Health Social and Ethical Issues • Health Issues
• Physical
• Mental
• Addiction
• Behavioral
• Cyber mobbing
• Plagiarism
PLE with ICT
Sketch your own
• Using this information: Develop a personalized learning course from one of your existing courses (or one you like to develop) or a course you attended:
• Create your own framework for a good course
Use
https://www.spiderscribe.net Or
https://www.mindmup.com/ Or any other Cloud tool
Criteria for a good personalised learning
1. The pedagogical approach or didactic process:
a) HOW organised
b) What TOOLS/software
2. The object/content of learning WHAT is the content
3. The subject/intended for the actors WHO is involved
Type Indicator
Weight
(Importance,
1=basic 100%, 2
= 150%, 3=200%)
Green:
present
Orange:
to be
adjusted
Red:
missing
HOW
Diagnostic entry test to start a real personalised
learning trajectory
100 %
Diagnostic tests during the personalised learning
trajectory
150 %
Assessment at the end (via test and/or portfolio) 100 %
m-learning or u-learning instead of e-learning 150 %
Take different learning styles into account 100 %
TOOLS
Social network or other form of contact with co-
learners included
100 %
Interactivity 200 %
Accessibility and usability of learning materials for
everyone
100 %
Monitoring via the system 150 %
Motivation (entertainment) tools 100 %
WHAT
Formal education --> core-curriculum 100 %
Possibility (not obligatory) to include non-formal and
informal learning
100 %
Valuing all dimensions of the learner 150 %
Valuing previous knowledge, competences, life and
work skills, also informal
100 %
Taking the cognitive background of the target group
into consideration
100 %
Flexibility in the system (flexible content) 200 %
WHO
Ownership of personalised learning 200 %
Instructor / tutor, experts and teachers to guide and
support the learning
150 %
Contact with peer group/ cooperative learning 100 %
Personalised learning course in a correct VLE: easy?
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
CA
SE 0
1
CA
SE 0
2
CA
SE 0
3
CA
SE 0
4
CA
SE 0
5
CA
SE 0
8
CA
SE 0
9
CA
SE 1
2
CA
SE 1
5
CA
SE 1
6
CA
SE 1
7
CA
SE 1
8
CA
SE 2
0
CA
SE 2
1
CA
SE 2
2
CA
SE 2
3
CA
SE 2
4
CA
SE 2
5
CA
SE 2
6
CA
SE 2
8
CA
SE 2
9
CA
SE 3
1
CA
SE 3
2
CA
SE 3
4
CA
SE 4
3
CA
SE 4
5
CA
SE 4
7
CA
SE 4
8
CA
SE 5
3
CA
SE 5
4
CA
SE 5
5
CA
SE 5
6
CA
SE 5
7
CA
SE 5
8
CA
SE 5
9
CA
SE 6
0Average score: 58,6%
Median: 56,7%
Personalised learning course in a correct VLE: easy?
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
CA
SE 0
1
CA
SE 0
2
CA
SE 0
3
CA
SE 0
4
CA
SE 0
5
CA
SE 0
8
CA
SE 0
9
CA
SE 1
2
CA
SE 1
5
CA
SE 1
6
CA
SE 1
7
CA
SE 1
8
CA
SE 2
0
CA
SE 2
1
CA
SE 2
2
CA
SE 2
3
CA
SE 2
4
CA
SE 2
5
CA
SE 2
6
CA
SE 2
8
CA
SE 2
9
CA
SE 3
1
CA
SE 3
2
CA
SE 3
4
CA
SE 4
3
CA
SE 4
5
CA
SE 4
7
CA
SE 4
8
CA
SE 5
3
CA
SE 5
4
CA
SE 5
5
CA
SE 5
6
CA
SE 5
7
CA
SE 5
8
CA
SE 5
9
CA
SE 6
0Average score: 58,6%
Median: 56,7%
Type
Indicato
r
Weigh
t
CASE0
1
CASE0
2
CASE0
3
CASE0
4
CASE0
5
CASE0
8
CASE0
9
CASE1
2
CASE1
5
CASE1
6
CASE1
7
CASE1
8
CASE2
0
CASE2
1
CASE2
2
CASE2
3
CASE2
4
CASE2
5
CASE2
6
CASE2
8
CASE2
9
CASE3
1
CASE3
2
CASE3
4
CASE4
3
CASE4
5
CASE4
7
CASE4
8
CASE5
3
CASE5
4
CASE5
5
CASE5
6
CASE5
7
CASE5
8
CASE5
9
CASE6
0
HOW
Diagnosticentrytesttostart
arealpersonalizedlearning
trajectory 4,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
HOW
diagnostictestsduringthe
personalizedlearning
trajectory 6,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
HOWassessmentattheend(via
testand/orportfolio) 4,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 3 4 0 4 5 0 0 3 5 4 4 5 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
HOWm-learningoru-learning
insteadofe-learning 6,1% 0 4 4 0 4 4 2 0 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 3 5 4 0 2 5 2 5 5
HOWtakedifferentlearningtypes
intoaccount 4,1% 0 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 3 2 0 2 5 5 3 5 4 0 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 5 2 3 0 2 5 1 4 5
TOOLS
socialnetworkorotherform
ofcontactwithco-learners
included 4,1% 0 5 5 5 3 5 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 5 4 0 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 3 5 0 3 0 3 5 5 3 5
TOOLS Interactivity 8,2% 0 5 3 3 0 5 5 4 4 4 2 3 2 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 5 4 3 3
TOOLS
Accessibilityandusabilityof
learningmaterialsfor
everyone 4,1% 3 3 1 5 0 5 5 4 3 4 0 2 2 3 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 3 5 5 1 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 4 4
TOOLS monitoringviathesystem 6,1% 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 4 5 5 3 4 5 0 3 0 4 4 4 4 5
TOOLSmotivation(entertainment)
tools 4,1% 0 5 0 0 3 3 5 2 4 3 2 2 3 4 5 2 5 3 5 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 3 4 4 3 1 2 5 0 3 5
WHATformaleducation-->core-
curriculum 4,1% 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 3 3 1 3 5 5 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 5 5 4 3 5 2 4 1 1 5 5 4 5
WHAT
possibility(notobligatory)to
includenon-formaland
informallearning 4,1% 0 5 3 5 3 5 0 0 2 4 4 2 1 3 5 4 0 4 3 5 2 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 0 0 1 3 5 3 2 5
WHATvaluingalldimensionsofthe
learner 6,1% 0 5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 0 1 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 3
WHAT
valuingpreviousknowledge,
competences,lifeandwork
skills,alsoinformal 4,1% 0 3 3 5 3 5 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 2 5 4 3 4 0 1 0 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3 5 3 4 4 5
WHAT
takingthecognitive
backgroundofthetarget
groupintoconsideration 4,1% 0 5 3 1 0 4 3 0 0 3 1 3 2 1 4 4 0 3 2 2 5 5 3 4 4 5 3 5 4 2 1 4 5 2 2 3
WHATflexibilityinthesystem
(flexiblecontent) 8,2% 4 5 5 0 3 0 0 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 4 0 0 0 3 5 0 3 4
WHOownershipofpersonalized
learning 8,2% 0 5 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 1 5 0 3 5 1 1 4 4 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 2 0 3 4 0 2 3
WHO
instructor/tutor,experts
andteacherstoguideand
supportthelearning 6,1% 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 3 2 4 3 4 2 3 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 0 4 3 3 5 5 4 5
WHOContactwithpeergroup/
cooperativelearning 4,1% 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 2 4 3 1 3 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 0 1 0 3 5 3 3 5
Totalscore(max100%)
13,1%
79,2%
71,0%
53,1%
42,4%
58,0%
27,8%
26,9%
30,6%
51,8%
31,0%
57,1%
24,5%
41,2%
75,5%
56,7%
63,3%
75,9%
42,4%
42,9%
83,3%
92,7%
82,9%
91,0%
82,9%
84,9%
77,1%
91,0%
33,1%
44,5%
13,5%
51,8%
80,0%
51,4%
55,1%
85,3%
Type
Indicato
r
Weigh
t
CASE01
CASE02
CASE03
CASE04
CASE05
CASE08
CASE09
CASE12
CASE15
CASE16
CASE17
CASE18
CASE20
CASE21
CASE22
CASE23
CASE24
CASE25
CASE26
CASE28
CASE29
CASE31
CASE32
CASE34
CASE43
CASE45
CASE47
CASE48
CASE53
CASE54
CASE55
CASE56
CASE57
CASE58
CASE59
CASE60
HOW
Diagnosticentrytesttostart
arealpersonalizedlearning
trajectory 4,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
HOW
diagnostictestsduringthe
personalizedlearning
trajectory 6,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
HOWassessmentattheend(via
testand/orportfolio) 4,1% 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 3 4 0 4 5 0 0 3 5 4 4 5 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
HOWm-learningoru-learning
insteadofe-learning 6,1% 0 4 4 0 4 4 2 0 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 3 5 4 0 2 5 2 5 5
HOWtakedifferentlearningtypes
intoaccount 4,1% 0 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 3 2 0 2 5 5 3 5 4 0 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 5 2 3 0 2 5 1 4 5
TOOLS
socialnetworkorotherform
ofcontactwithco-learners
included 4,1% 0 5 5 5 3 5 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 5 4 0 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 3 5 0 3 0 3 5 5 3 5
TOOLS Interactivity 8,2% 0 5 3 3 0 5 5 4 4 4 2 3 2 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 5 4 3 3
TOOLS
Accessibilityandusabilityof
learningmaterialsfor
everyone 4,1% 3 3 1 5 0 5 5 4 3 4 0 2 2 3 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 3 5 5 1 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 4 4
TOOLS monitoringviathesystem 6,1% 0 4 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 4 5 5 3 4 5 0 3 0 4 4 4 4 5
TOOLSmotivation(entertainment)
tools 4,1% 0 5 0 0 3 3 5 2 4 3 2 2 3 4 5 2 5 3 5 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 3 4 4 3 1 2 5 0 3 5
WHATformaleducation-->core-
curriculum 4,1% 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 3 3 1 3 5 5 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 5 5 4 3 5 2 4 1 1 5 5 4 5
WHAT
possibility(notobligatory)to
includenon-formaland
informallearning 4,1% 0 5 3 5 3 5 0 0 2 4 4 2 1 3 5 4 0 4 3 5 2 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 0 0 1 3 5 3 2 5
WHATvaluingalldimensionsofthe
learner 6,1% 0 5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 0 1 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 3
WHAT
valuingpreviousknowledge,
competences,lifeandwork
skills,alsoinformal 4,1% 0 3 3 5 3 5 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 2 5 4 3 4 0 1 0 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3 5 3 4 4 5
WHAT
takingthecognitive
backgroundofthetarget
groupintoconsideration 4,1% 0 5 3 1 0 4 3 0 0 3 1 3 2 1 4 4 0 3 2 2 5 5 3 4 4 5 3 5 4 2 1 4 5 2 2 3
WHATflexibilityinthesystem
(flexiblecontent) 8,2% 4 5 5 0 3 0 0 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 5 5 4 4 2 2 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 4 0 0 0 3 5 0 3 4
WHOownershipofpersonalized
learning 8,2% 0 5 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 1 5 0 3 5 1 1 4 4 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 2 0 3 4 0 2 3
WHO
instructor/tutor,experts
andteacherstoguideand
supportthelearning 6,1% 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 3 2 4 3 4 2 3 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 0 4 3 3 5 5 4 5
WHOContactwithpeergroup/
cooperativelearning 4,1% 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 2 4 3 1 3 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 0 1 0 3 5 3 3 5
Totalscore(max100%)
13,1%
79,2%
71,0%
53,1%
42,4%
58,0%
27,8%
26,9%
30,6%
51,8%
31,0%
57,1%
24,5%
41,2%
75,5%
56,7%
63,3%
75,9%
42,4%
42,9%
83,3%
92,7%
82,9%
91,0%
82,9%
84,9%
77,1%
91,0%
33,1%
44,5%
13,5%
51,8%
80,0%
51,4%
55,1%
85,3%
Averagescore: 58,6%
Median: 56,7%
Let’s see with examples
• http://www.schoolonthecloud.net/state-of-the-art---case-studies The 59 case studies gathered by you all
• https://www.mooc-list.com A complete list of Massive Open Online Courses (free online courses) offered by the top universities and colleges in a wide range of subjects
Sketch your own
• Using the information and guidelines: Develop a personalized learning course from one of your existing courses (or one you like to develop) or a course you attended:
• Update your own framework for a good course,
• Take into account the 4 criteria
– HOW
–What TOOLS
–WHAT
–WHO
Use the checklist!