the myth of influencers

19
We make sense out of media N Facebook Online News Blog Twi3er Video TV Print Images Forum The Myth of Influence @LutzFinger

Upload: lutz-finger

Post on 04-Jul-2015

668 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Our own experience tells us, that some people are more influential then others. A good run CRM system should therefore identify those “Opinion Leader”, “task makers” or “influencer” to treat them differently. But do they even exist? Lutz Finger (@LutzFinger) will look at anecdotal evidence as well as research to clarify how to measure influence. The findings: # Influencers are often not wide-spreading… they are local. # There not only a few dominating the rest… it is more network and peer pressure which influences. # Influencers are often overestimated… 50% is homophily. # Influence very much depends on the topic. Rather than to look for influencers look for Broadcaster. However be aware that broadcaster only create awareness and not necessarily intention. The video from the presentation: http://youtu.be/HgCNwUytjZI

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: the myth of influencers

We  make  sense  out  of  media  

N  

Facebook  

Online  News  

Blog  

Twi3er  

Video  

TV  

Print  

Images  

Forum  

The  Myth  of  Influence  

@LutzFinger  

Page 2: the myth of influencers

@LutzFinger  

Co-­‐Founder  

Researcher  &  Speaker  

Book  Author  

Page 3: the myth of influencers

Quiz Please  raise  your  hand,  if….  

•  Would  you  choose  a  doctor  because  friends  recommended  it?  

•  Would  you  choose  a  computer  program  because  friends  recommended  it?  

•  Would  you  have  gone  to  a  movie  because  your  friends  recommended  the  movie?  

 

Page 4: the myth of influencers

Success  Stories  

●  100  influencers  in  social  media  ●  Offered  Test  Drives  and  “broadcasted”  their  comments  ●  YouTube  videos  related  to  this  campaign  generated  over  6.5  million  views  

…  and  was  it  successful?  ●  Ford  received  more  than  50,000  requests  for  informaQon  ●  10,000  cars  were  sold  in  the  first  six  days  

Source:  "Demys.fying  social  media,"  McKinsey  Quarterly,  April  2012  Picture:  YouTube  channel  

Awareness Trigger Intention

Influencer  

Page 5: the myth of influencers

The  Marketer  Dream  

Logo  by  OCAL  &  clker.com      

Page 6: the myth of influencers

The  Marketer  Dream  

Logo  by  OCAL  &  clker.com      

Page 7: the myth of influencers

The  Marketer  Dream  

Logo  by  OCAL  &  clker.com      

Page 8: the myth of influencers

Since  1955  

●  opinion  leaders  (Katz  and  Lazarsfelt  1955)  ●  influenQals  (Merton  1968)  ●  Influencers  (Rand  2004)  ●  e-­‐fluenQals  (Burson-­‐Marsteller  2001)  ●  hubs  (Rosen  2000)  ●  Mavens  &  connectors  (Gladwell  2000)  

Source:  Amazon.com

 Website  

Law of the Few Social epidemics (are)… driven by the efforts of a handful of exceptional people (Malcom  Gladwell,  2000,  The  Tipping  Point)  

Page 9: the myth of influencers

Influence  can  be  local  

Source:  h3p://www.doh.wa.gov/        

Why?    ●  By  Chance?  ●  Influence?  ●  Socio-­‐Economical?  

Page 10: the myth of influencers

Yahoo!  Go  

Source:  Sinan  Arala,  Lev  Muchnik,  and  Arun  Sundararajan  (2009):  PNAS  Vol  106,  no  51      

IntroducQon  2007    QuesQon:  

•  friends  influence  friends  to  adopt  •  friends  with  similar  backgrounds  and  tastes  adopt  (homophily)  

 Sinan  Arala  et.al.:  •  Analyzed  27.4  million  users  •  89  million  disQnct  relaQonships  •  14  bn  page  views  •  3.9  bn  messages  •  Over  5  month  

Page 11: the myth of influencers

Influence  comes  from  many  

Source:  Sinan  Arala,  Lev  Muchnik,  and  Arun  Sundararajan  (2009):  PNAS  Vol  106,  no  51      

FracOo

n  of  Ado

pters  v

s.  Non

-­‐ado

pters  

Number  of  Adopters  in  Network  

•  Network  externality  are  the  main  driver  for  Influence  -­‐  contagious  •  Homophily  is  accounQng  for  50%  of  the  adopQon  effect  

Page 12: the myth of influencers

Influence  depends  on  the  Topic  

Source:  Kevin  Lewisa,  Marco  Gonzaleza  and  Jason  Kaufman  (2012):  PNAS  Vol  109,  no  1  

Not  all  Topics  are:      •  4  years  •  1001  Students  on  Facebook  •  tradiQonal  Self-­‐reported  Data  •  How  did  taste  Spread  

Source:  orgtheory.net  

Page 13: the myth of influencers

The  Myth  of  Influencer  

●  Influence  can  be        local

●  Influence  is  done  by    many (like  peer  pressure)  ●  Influence  might  be  in  reality  homophily

●  Influence  depends  on    topic  

 

13  

Page 14: the myth of influencers

BUT  why….    Aja  Dior  M.  omgg,  my  aunt  .ffany  who  work  for  whitney  houston  just  found  whitney  houston  dead  in  the  tub.  such  ashamed  &  sad  :(  

45  min  

Or  why….    

6  month  

Source:  TED  talk  by  Kevin  Allocca    

Page 15: the myth of influencers

15  

BroadcasQng        ≠            Influence  

Awareness        ≠            IntenQon  

Page 16: the myth of influencers

How  to  MEASURE  broadcast  

● Reach  ● AcQvity  ● Engagement  

16  

Page 17: the myth of influencers

Youth  Olympic  Games  

17  

0  

1000  

2000  

3000  

4000  

5000  

6000  

Athletes  Role  Models  

Young  Ambassadors  

Young  Reporters  

YOG  Ambassador  

AcOvity  versus  Response  

Response  

PromoQng  YOG  Social  Media  AcQvity  

● Reach  ● AcQvity  ● Engagement  

Source:  Fisheye  Analy.cs  

Page 18: the myth of influencers

CRM  Strategy  

●  Re-­‐Check  your  Influencer  Strategy:  ─  It  might  be  local  ─  It  might  be  more  based  on  peer  pressure  ─  It  might  not  fit  all  of  your  products  

●  Look  out  for  the  Broadcaster  ─  Most  reach  measure  will  work  ─  Be  sure  that  you  measure  engagement  ─  Stay  away  from  acQvity  

Intent

Awareness

Source:  Fisheye  Analy.cs  

Page 19: the myth of influencers

Thanks  

If  you  liked  it.  Follow  me  on  Twi3er  @LutzFinger.  

Book  by  O’Reilly  Media  To  be  published  in  Spring  2013