the national strategy for private sector development · 2018-06-04 · the national strategy for...
TRANSCRIPT
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTORDEVELOPMENT
BOOSTING INVESTOR CONFIDENCE FOR ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENTAND INDUSTRIALISATION
2017
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
2017/18-2021/22
Plot 2-12, Appollo Kaggwa RoadP.O. Box 8147, Kampala
Telephone: +256 414 707000www.finance.go.ug
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTORDEVELOPMENT
BOOSTING INVESTOR CONFIDENCE FOR ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENTAND INDUSTRIALISATION
2017
2017/18-2021/22
Plot 2-12, Appollo Kaggwa RoadP.O. Box 8147, Kampala
Telephone: +256 414 707000www.finance.go.ug evelopment Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic D
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
NATIONAL STRATEGYFOR
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
2017/18-2021/22
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
2017
ii
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
FOREWORD
Uganda has pursued a Private Sector-led approach to its economic policy and management over the last three decades. This has put the Private Sector at the forefront of the growth and development process of the Country. The role of the Public Sector in this context is to provide an enabling environment through policy, continuous regulatory reforms and good infrastructure. Government intervenes through various initiatives ranging from economic policies, plans and regulations. These interventions are targeted at eradicating poverty, modernising agriculture, building an industrial base and ultimately transforming the structure of the economy in a sustainable manner.
In spite of the various constraints and gaps including inadequate infrastructure, limited access to finance and high interest rates, Government efforts have been able to yield economic stability and spread economic opportunities. GDP growth averaged 5.4 percent per annum over the NDP I period (2010/11-2014/15) and poverty declined further from 24.5 percent in 2010 to 19.3 percent in 2013. The Private Sector however remains weak and largely informal. This is partly because past efforts of the Public Sector were too broad and uncoordinated across Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs). Government is now, pursuing a better prioritised Public Investment agenda with more focused execution plans.
It is against this renewed focus in public investment that the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED) has developed the National Strategy for Private Sector Development (NSPSD) to guide both Public and Private Sector interventions across all three pillars; the Micro, Meso and Macro. This approach will drive the Private Sector in reaching the Country’s vision, goals and targets with respect to employment, income and wealth creation; ultimately delivering social economic transformation.
I thank the Private Sector players who worked with technical staff from my Ministry and the different MDAs in producing this comprehensive Strategy for Private Sector Development.
Matia Kasaija (MP)MINISTER OF FINANCE, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
iii
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
PREFACE
The National Strategy for Private Sector Development (NSPSD) FY 2017/18-2021/22 sets out a comprehensive scheme for coordinating the growth and development of the Private Sector in Uganda. The overall goal of the Strategy is to “increase competitiveness of the Private Sector and enhance its contribution to economic development”.
Government has taken this initiative to reinforce the policy of a Private Sector-led economy; to strengthen co-ordination of policies and initiatives geared towards growing and developing business enterprises; and to facilitate performance measurement and management of national efforts aimed at improving Private Sector competitiveness. The interventions in this strategy are organised around three pillars: economy-wide level (Macro pillar); the industry-specific level (Meso pillar) and the firm level (Micro pillar).
The strategy is defined by two features: it anchors Government interventions for Private Sector Development around a national industrialization agenda; and it is based on a simplified follow-up and review mechanism that uses sector-based structural benchmarks and service delivery indicators to inform performance measurement and management.
The implementation of this strategy is premised on effective service delivery. The strategic objectives under each of the three pillars will be realized through the standard planning, budgeting and implementation modalities of Government. In recognition of the Government approach required to support the Private Sector, a coordination Platform within the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development is enshrined within the Strategy.
I call upon all stakeholders to be effectively engaged in the delivery of this Strategy.
Keith MuhakaniziPermanent Secretary/Secretary to the Treasury
iv
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This National Strategy for Private Sector Development was prepared under the technical leadership of a team of experts and staff of Economic Development Policy and Research Department in Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MFPED).
We wish to recognize the guidance of the Technical and Top Management of MFPED, the input of the stakeholders from the Private Sector fraternity and the technical contributions of technocrats from relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies of Government.
Special thanks go to the Executive Director, PSFU, Mr. Gideon Badagawa and his team for championing the active engagement of the private sector in the formulation of this strategy.
We also wish to thank Dr. Madina Guloba Mwangale of the Economic Policy and Research Centre for editorial support rendered by way of important inputs and peer-review of the entire document for content and consistent validity.
v
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword.......................................................................................................................................ii Preface................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................iv Table of contents...................................................................................................................................v
CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION............................................................1 1.1 What is new in the NSPSD.................................................................................1 1.2 Implementation of the Strategy.....................................................................................2
CHAPTER TWO: THE STATUS OF UGANDA’S PRIVATE SECTOR............................................3 2.1 Profile and structure of the Private Sector in uganda...................................................3 2.2 Private Sector contribution to the Economy...................................................................3 2.3 Industrialisation.............................................................................................................5 2.3.1 Manufacturing...............................................................................................................6 2.3.2 Agro-processing...........................................................................................................6 2.3.3 Light Manufacturing, Heavy Manufacturing and Extractive Industries......................9 2.4 Services Sector...........................................................................................................11 2.4.1 Credit to the Private Sector.........................................................................................12 2.4.2 Professionalism and Skilling of Enterprises...............................................................15 2.4.3 Linkages to Foreign Direct Investments...................................................................15 2.4.4. Employment...............................................................................................................16 2.4.5 Performance of Exports..............................................................................................17 2.4.6 Ease of Doing Business..............................................................................................18 2.4.7 Legal and Regulatory Reforms................................................................................19 2.4.8 Contribution to Tax Revenue.......................................................................................20
CHAPTER THREE: NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT.........24 3.1 The Vision, Goal and Objective of the Strategy.........................................................24 3.1.1 Projected benchmark actions of the NSPSD..............................................................24 3.1.2 The Key Objectives of the NSPSD..............................................................................25 3.2 Approach of the NSPSD..............................................................................................26 3.2.1 Macro objectives........................................................................................................28 3.2.2 Meso objectives and interventions.............................................................................30 3.2.3 Micro objectives and interventions.............................................................................31
CHAPTER FOUR: IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS..............34 4.1 Coordination of implementation modalities...............................................................34 4.2 Key performance benchmarks....................................................................................34 4.3 Monitoring and Evaluation........................................................................................34 4.2 Service delivery outcomes and targets.......................................................................37 4.3 Risk assessment..........................................................................................................37 4.4 The role of Public Sector............................................................................................37 4.5 The role of the Private Sector......................................................................................37
Appendices:.........................................................................................................................................38i) General Assumptions..............................................................................................................38ii) Assumptions by objectives......................................................................................................38
vi
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
List of Tables
Table 1: Gaps in selected policies and how they are addressed in the NSPSD.....................................2Table 2: Enterprises by Size..................................................................................................................3Table 3: Agro-processing in Selected Commodities.............................................................................8Table 4: Status and Key Issues of Manufacturing..........................................................................10 Table 5: State of the Services by Sector..........................................................................................11 Table 6: Sector Analysis of Commercial Credit to Private sector (UGX BNS).............................13Table 7: Uganda’s Ease of Doing Business Rankings........................................................................19Table 8: Key areas for Improvement..................................................................................................21Table 9: Projected Benchmarks Actions..............................................................................................25Table 10: Selected development indicators to private sector development........................................26Table 11: Strategic Execution Matrix..................................................................................................35Table 12: General Assumptions..........................................................................................................38Table 13: Pillar Assumptions.............................................................................................................38
List of Graphs.
Graph 1: Sector Contribution to GDP...................................................................................................4Graph 2: Formal and Informal Sector Contribution to GDP................................................................4Graph 3: Trend Industry Value add to GDP by Country...............................................................................5Graph 4: Trend of Manufacturing to GDP by Country.........................................................................6Graph 5: Sectoral Shares of Credit to the Private Sector.....................................................................13Graph 6: Annual Commercial Bank lending Treasury bill rate (%)....................................................14Graph 7: Private Investments (Ush bn) and Exchange Rates Trend...................................................14Graph 8: Private Sector Contribution to GDP by Country..................................................................15Graph 9: FDI Inflows in EAC (USD Millions)...................................................................................16Graph 10: FDI Stock in EAC (USD Millions-Current).......................................................................16Graph 11: Uganda’s International Trade performance ($)..................................................................18Graph 12: Uganda’s Revenue Collection Performance......................................................................20
Pie ChartsPie Chart 1: Value Added in Agriculture...............................................................................................7
List of Figures Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of the Strategy 2015/16-2020/21...................................................27
vii
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AGOA African Growth and Opportunities ActBDS Business Development ServicesBOU Bank of UgandaBTVET Business, Technical and Vocational Education Training BUBU Buy Uganda Build Uganda.CBR Central Bank RateCICS Competitiveness and Investment Climate StrategyCMA Capital Markets AuthorityCRB Credit Reference BureauCOMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern AfricaDAP Draft Animal PowerDUCAR District Urban Community Access RoadsEAC East African CommunityEDB Ease of Doing BusinessEPA Economic Partnership Agreement.EPZs Export Processing Zones.ERA Electricity Regulatory AuthorityFDI Foreign Direct InvestmentFIPs Framework Implementation Plans FPC First Parliamentary CouncilFY Financial YearGAPR Government Annual Performance ReportGCI Global Competitive IndexGDP Gross Domestic ProductGOU Government of Uganda.ICT Information and Communications TechnologyIPO’s Initial Public OffersKCCA Kampala City Council AuthorityKIBP Kampala Industrial Business ParkLGs Local GovernmentsMAAIF Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and FisheriesMDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies.M&E Monitoring and EvaluationMFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic DevelopmentMGLSD Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social DevelopmentMJCA Ministry of Justice and Constitutional AffairsMLHUD Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban DevelopmentMSMEs Micro, Small and Medium EnterprisesMTIC Ministry of Trade, Industry and CooperativesMTCS Medium Term Competitiveness StrategyMTEFs Medium Term Expenditure FrameworksMoE&S Ministry of Education and SportsNARO National Agricultural Research InstituteNAGRCDB National Agricultural Genetic Research Centre and Data BankNBI National Backbone InfrastructureNDP National Development PlanNEDS National Export Development StrategyNES National Export Strategy
viii
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
NITA-U National Information Technology Authority-UgandaNIRA National Identity Registration AuthorityNTBs Non-Tariff BarriersNTP National Trade PolicyPAYE Pay As You EarnPFMA Public Financial Management ActPMA Plan for Modernization of AgriculturePS Private SectorPSDU Private Sector Development UnitNSPDS National Strategy for Private Sector Development PSFU Private Sector Foundation UgandaPS/ST Permanent Secretary/Secretary to the TreasuryPPP Public Private PartnershipsSADC Southern African Development CommunitySMEs Small and Medium EnterprisesSTI Science Technology and InnovationTNCs Transnational CorporationsTOC Theory of ChangeTREP Taxpayer Register Expansion ProjectUBOS Uganda Bureau of StatisticsUDB Uganda Development BankUEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company LimitedUEGCL Uganda Electricity Generation Company LimitedUEPB Uganda Exports Promotion BoardUETCL Uganda Electricity Transmission Company LimitedUFZA Uganda Free Zone AuthorityUIA Uganda Investment AuthorityUIRI Uganda Industrial Research InstituteULRC Uganda Law Reform CommissionUNBS Uganda National Bureau of StandardsUNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentUNRA Uganda National Roads AuthorityURA Uganda Revenue AuthorityURSB Uganda Registration Services BureauUWRSA Uganda Warehouse Receipt Systems Authority
1
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTIONThis Chapter sets the tone and justification for the holistic approach embedded in this National Strategy for Private Sector Development.
Government of Uganda has for long recognized the significance of the private sector in achieving sustainable socio-economic development. Uganda’s economic development policy envisages an inclusive private sector-led and export-oriented economy. To that end, Government designed and implemented several initiatives such as the Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture (PMA), the Medium Term Competitiveness Strategy – MTCS (2000-2005) and the Competitiveness and Investment Climate Strategy (CICS) I (2005/6-2009/10) and II (2011-2015/16). These strategies were useful in building stakeholder consensus around a common agenda but remained very broad with limited synergies between them.
The National Strategy for Private Sector Development-NSPSD 2017/18-2021/22 takes into account the key lessons from the design and implementation of previous strategies and has been formulated for a five year period (2017/18-2021/22), in accordance with the priorities of the National Development Plan (NDP II). The NSPSD, among other things, aims to facilitate coordinated action within the public sector and between the public and private sector for development. On the basis of a comprehensive situational analysis of Uganda’s Private Sector, the NSPSD proposes interventions to be undertaken at Macro, Meso and Micro levels of the economy. The Macro interventions relate to creating an enabling business environment while Meso interventions focus on accelerating industrialization and business linkages. The Micro interventions aim at enhancing productivity and modernisation at firm and household level.
1.1 What is new in the NSPSDThe NSPSD is characterised by two main features. First, it anchors Government interventions for Private Sector Development (PSD) on a National industrialisation agenda. It aims to strengthen structural transformation in the economy by deepening the links between agriculture and industry while reducing the informal sector. Accordingly, the NSPSD approaches industrialisation from a holistic perspective, taking into account the entire production value chain and facilitating business linkages and integration. The NSPSD has been formulated within existing policy frameworks like the National Industrial Policy (2008-2018). It identifies policy gaps within this policy framework (Table 1) and proactively prescribes ways of addressing them.
Secondly, the NSPSD is based on a simplified follow up and review mechanism that uses sector-based structural benchmarks and service delivery indicators to inform performance measurement and management. Following the recommendations made in the CICS II (2010/11-2015/16) evaluation report of February 2016, the NSPSD establishes new baselines for both services and routine indicators to evaluate the quality of service delivery.
2
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 1: Gaps in Selected Policies and how they are Addressed in the NSPSDPolicy Key Issues/Gaps Treatment of gaps in NSPSDNational Industrial Policy, 2008
• Focuses more on higher level outcomes (i.e. Industry contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP); manufactured goods to total exports etc.) but does not address intermediate targets.
• No concrete actions within priority sectors are prescribed.
• Focuses largely on supply side and less on demand side factors.
• Comprehensive analysis of industrial sectors and identifying key constraints of each sub sector (Section 2.3).
• Recognize, as part of the structural benchmarks to be addressed: review and update the National Industrial Policy; formulate a successor Industrialization Plan; and institute a mechanism for regularly updating both the industrial policy and plan in line with emerging developments.
• Incorporate industry as a separate pillar (Meso) in the strategy and formulate sustainable interventions that accelerate industrialization (Chapter 3).
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Policy, 2015
• Proposes measures that are largely in line with NSPSD, but requires interventions to address modernization of business firms.
• Focus on skills and business development services through interventions at macro and micro-Pillars (Chapter 3.)
National Agricultural Policy, 2011
• Comprehensive analysis of agricultural sector and challenges towards its transformation.
• Lacks commodity specific analysis and clear strategies on how to achieve value addition.
• Approach agricultural sector from both supply side (improve inputs, modernization of farming) and demand side (linkages to industries, production and productivity of agriculture).
• Undertake commodity specific value chain analysis (Section 2.3) of Chapter 2.
Land Policy, 2013
• Limited analysis of effects of land title to all policies on private sector development and investment.
• Emphasise title registration, setting benchmarks for Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban development (MLHUD) to finalize computerization of land registry (Chapter 4).
1.2 Implementation of the StrategyThe objectives of the NSPSD will be achieved through:
a) Prioritisation of selected structural benchmarks and service delivery targets under the Programme Based Budgeting (PBB) approach; b) Use of the National Standards Indicator framework and PBB process to facilitate performance measurement and coordination of MDAs; and c) The requirement by MFPED for all MDAs to have a strategic plan within a certain period as a precondition for budgetary allocation. This requirement provides an opening to identify and prioritise strategic private sector implementation issues.
3
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER TWO
2.0. THE STATUS OF UGANDA’S PRIVATE SECTOR
2.1. Profile and Structure of the Private Sector in UgandaUganda’s Private Sector is dominated by Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) comprising approximately 1,100,000 enterprises and employing approximately 2.5 million people equivalent to 90% of total non-farm private sector workers1 . Evidence from the Uganda business registry in 20102 shows that majority of enterprises were operating on a micro to small scale with more than 93% of the enterprises categorised as micro enterprises and employing less than 5 persons each (Table 2).
Table 2: Enterprises by SizeEnterprise Size Number of enterprises Share per category (%)1-4 Employees 428,100 93.55-9 Employees 19,027 4.1>10 Employees 10,979 2.4Total 458,106 100
Source: Census of Businesses Establishments (UBOS, 2010/11)
Total private sector contribution to GDP is nearly 80% going by the GDP share of the national budget in FY 2015/16. Most enterprises are located in Kampala Business District (45%) and Central region (21%) with the rest distributed across the other regions–Western (14%), Eastern (13%), and Northern (7%)
In terms of ownership, sole proprietors constitute 43% of enterprises and private limited liability companies 33%. Others include: Partnerships (18%), Associations (2%) and cooperatives (4%)3. In the MSME sector, sole proprietorship is the most frequent form of business operation, reflecting the dominance of micro enterprises. 4MSME’s are predominately informal and young, majority of which have not been in existence for more than 5 years.
There is a high mortality rate of enterprises with 90% of them operating for less than 20 years5. At the top end of the spectrum, only a handful of indigenous enterprises have survived the demise of their founders. The majority of these small enterprises are family based with no formal skills, no clear addresses and usually operating in an informal manner, using basic technology. This undermines the ability of these enterprises to gain access to services such as advanced technology, information or financial services for them to compete favourably in the market6 .
2.2 Private Sector Contribution to the EconomySector specific contributions to GDP have nearly stagnated for the past 10 years (Graph 1). However, services sector has continuously been the highest contributor to GDP and in FY 2015/16, the sector contributed 49 % to GDP of which trade and repairs contributed 12.7%, Education (6.2%), Real Estate Activities (4.7%) and human health and social work activities (4.6%). Tourism has also become prominent registering a growth rate of 14% between FY 2008/09 and 2013/14. Although Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing contributed 23.5 % while Industry contributed 19.7% to GDP in FY 2015/16 (graph1)7 , the former’s contribution to formal GDP remained relatively small at below 6% in FY2015/16.
1Financial Sector Deepening 2015. National Small Business Survey.2The Census of Business Establishments (CoBE) was last conducted in 2010 3Private Sector Platform for Action Report, An analysis of private sector growth challenges and proposals for policy reform, Private Sector Foundation Uganda (PSFU) 20144Financial Sector Deepening 2015. National Small Business Survey Uganda.5Financial Sector Deepening 2015.6Private Sector Platform for Action Report, An analysis of private sector growth challenges and proposals for policy reform, Private Sector Foundation Uganda (PSFU) 20147Statistical Abstract 2016-UBOS
4
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Graph 1: Sector Contribution to GDP
47.2 47.0 46.9 46.4 45.5 47.7 46.2 47.4 47.9 48.6 49.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2005
/06
2006
/07
2007
/08
2008
/09
2009
/10
2010
/11
2011
/12
2012
/13
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
% sh
are
Agriculture, forestry and fishing Industry Services
Source: Various Statistical Abstracts Uganda Bureau of Statistics
Uganda is a dual economy with the informal sector contributing a significant share to GDP (43.9%) in FY 2014/15. The size and strength of the informal sector as evidenced by its contribution to GDP poses a significant challenge to formal enterprises. A 2009 survey conducted by UBOS revealed that about 39 percent of MSMEs surveyed were constrained by competition from the informal sector.
The informal sector, however, remains an important source of employment, creating 19 out of 20 non-agriculture jobs with young people occupying 94.7% of those jobs. This is particularly important given Uganda’s high population growth rate of 3 per cent per annum. By 2014, the proportion of under-18 year olds in the population stood at 55 per cent and the working age population (14-64 years) was 18.2 million or 52 per cent of total population.
Graph 2: Formal and Informal Sector Contribution to GDP
43.3%
45.8% 45.2% 45.5%
43.9%
50.5%
48.2% 48.3% 47.9% 48.7%
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
Informal sector Formal sector
Source: Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2015
5
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Similarly, a close analysis of sector contribution to GDP shows that MSMEs contribute 18%8 to Uganda’s GDP. This prompted Government to formulate the National MSME Policy in 2015 and the Small and Medium Enterprise Strategic Development Plan for 2016-2020 to foster MSME development. Specifically, the Policy emphasizes creating an enabling environment for MSME growth by addressing some of the underlying challenges through the promotion of research, innovation, value addition; facilitation of market access and business information; access to credit; and exploiting entrepreneurship potential. Furthermore, the policy addresses cross cutting issues which include gender equality and HIV/AIDS.
Despite Government’s recognition of the informal sector in both the policy and the strategy, there is no clear strategic direction on addressing informality. The policy highlights the challenges faced by MSMEs, namely; low productivity levels, high informality, low growth of enterprises and limited innovation.
2.3. IndustrialisationIndustrialisation plays a crucial role in the economic development process. It does not only promote development of other sectors of the economy through backward and forward linkages but it is also strongly associated with an increase of foreign exchange earnings leading to an improvement in the balance of payment outcomes. Structural change entails a shift of resources from the agriculture sector to the industrial sector. However, the sector’s contribution to GDP in Uganda has not changed significantly over time and has stagnated at approximately 20% since 2009 and thus still remains low compared to other countries as shown in graph 3.
Graph 3: Trend Industry value add to GDP by Country.
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
% o
f GDP
China Japan Kenya Korea, Rep.
Tanzania Uganda South Africa
Source: World Development Indicators, 2016
The Manufacturing and Construction sub-sectors are the main drivers of industry in Uganda and contributed 9.6% and 7.5% to GDP respectively in 2014/15. In the last decades, growth in Uganda’s industrial sector occurred mainly on account of the construction sector, rather than through growth in essential raw materials, investment in machinery and equipment, which are essential for agro pro-cessing and overall industrial expansion and future economic growth.9
8Private Sector Platform for Action Report, An analysis of private sector growth challenges and proposals for policy reform, Private Sector Foundation Uganda (PSFU) 20149African Development Bank 2014. Eastern Africa’s Manufacturing Sector. Uganda Country Report.
6
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Other sub-sectors of the industrial sector are electricity generation and water services, which are es-sential for industrial sector expansion and future economic growth.
2.3.1 ManufacturingManufacturing (both formal and informal) critically impacts on the performance of the industrial sector in a country. From graph 4 , Uganda’s share of manufacturing to GDP lags far behind emerging economies such as China, South Korea (over 30% and rising), South Africa (about 20%, but declining), and performs better than Tanzania but below Kenya.
Graph 4: Trend of Manufacturing to GDP by Country
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
% o
f GDP
China Japan Kenya Korea, Rep.
Tanzania Uganda South Africa
Source: World Development Indicators, 2016
Uganda’s manufacturing sub-sector is characterized by firm size and type of product. In terms of firm size, it is dominated by a large number of small scale producers (90%) manufacturing goods with a high import content and thus low value addition. Production costs remain very high and most establishments are characterized by excess capacity with utilization at an average of 50%.10 In terms of product type, the sub-sector consists of agro-processing, light manufacturing and heavy manufacturing product makers. Most of manufacturing activities are in agro-processing (39%) producing low value added basic consumer goods. There are few capital goods industries in the country. Thus the level of innovation remains low. The rising share of manufacturing goods in exports has therefore to be assessed with care, since these are still mainly goods with limited value addition. Most of Uganda’s exports are resource based (47% in 2012) and 33% of exports are high and medium technology products.
2.3.2 Agro-processingAgro-processing refers to the processing of raw materials, which originate from the agricultural sector. Agricultural inputs are used in various forms of manufacturing activities, including that of foods, beverages, and tobacco, textile, wood, paper, and rubber products among others. Industry, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries subsectors, contributed 4.0% and 3.2% of agroprocessed exports respectively, by FY 2015/1611 . However, despite the agricultural sector remaining the backbone of Uganda livelihoods, its annual growth rate at 2.9%12 and contribution to GDP still remains low with
10African Development Bank 2014. Eastern Africa’s Manufacturing Sector. Uganda Country Report.11UBOS Statistical Abstract 201612UBOS (2016), Statistical Abstract2016
7
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
value addition concentrated on food crops (accounting for 50% of total value addition). Cash crops only account for 10% of total value addition, despite being the main export and raw material base for the country. Limited value addition to agricultural produce, post-harvest losses and supply side constraints are some of the key challenges in the sector. Chart 1 shows value addition by sub-sector within the agriculture sector.
Pie Chart 1: Value Added in Agriculture.
Forestry 16% Livestock
17%
Fishing 7%
Cash crops 10%
Food crops 50%
Forestry Livestock Fishing Cash crops Food crops
Source: MFPED 2015
Table 3 provides an overview of the agro-processing sub-sectors and outlines the key issues emerging from coffee, tea, dairy, beef, leather, fisheries and horticulture sub-sectors which are among the identified key priority commodities in the NDP II. The salient issues which emerge from different commodities in agro-processing relate to lack of adequate processing facilities, quality inputs, a clear legal and regulatory framework in the different sectors, available, affordable and reliable power, and high yielding breeds and varieties in both livestock and horticultural sub-sectors.
8
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 3: Agro-processing in Selected CommoditiesSubsector Status Key IssuesCoffee • Key foreign exchange earner (15% of
total export earnings in 14/15).• Limited number of roasting companies
for value addition.• Decline in Coffee Processing (-3.2% in
2014)
• Low attraction of investors and capital.
• Limited skilled labour.• Poor Coffee Standards.• Low value addition.
Tea • 70% produced in large scale production• Majority exported through Mombasa
auction• Reduction in Tea Export earnings of
recent (1% in 2014)
• Limited Research in high quality and yielding varieties.
• Ugandan Tea not marketed as its own brand.
• Absence of a national Tea Policy.Livestock Beef
• Three up to standard abattoirs and seven small scale beef processing plants
• Production of beef increased by 3 per cent from 180,300 MT in 2010 to 202,929 Mt in 2014
• Export earnings from processed meat and live animals are negligible.
• Lack of Improved breeds.• Poor Disease control methods.• Low processing for value
addition.• Quality and certification
challenges.
Dairy• Annual milk production of 2 billion litres• 85 per cent sold in raw form generating
US$ 160 million, 15 per cent in processed form generating US $108 million
• 10 large and small dairy processors
• Poor milk yielding breeds.• Poor animal husbandry practices.• Low value addition• Poor regulatory framework.• High costs of power.
Leather• Major livestock export earner, generating
US$64.35 m in 2013• 8 Tanneries• Hides and skins exported in raw form• Capacity per year for hides 340.000, for
skins 2,150,000
• Only one factory (Jinja) processing hides and skins up to a finished stage.
• Tanneries operating below capacity.
• Most leather products imported.• Smuggling of unprocessed hides
and skins.Fisheries • Decline in fish species (Tilapia and
Nile Perch)• Closure of 12 out of 21 fish processing
plants• Exported worth US$18m in 2015
• Lack of adequate cold storage facilities/equipment.
• Low volumes of fish due to illegal fishing
• Lack of effective enforcement• Limited technological uptake of
new alternative fishing methods.• Initial investments costs very
high and risky business
9
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Subsector Status Key IssuesHorticulture • Contributed $ 80.56 million (3%) to
total exports in 2014/15 and among top ten foreign exchange earners
• Contribution of other fruits
• Need for construction of irrigation schemes.
• Need for storage facilities.• Need for Standardisation.• Waste management/health
concerns due to chemical application
Maize and Pulses
• Dominated by smallholder farmers, mainly channelled through informal markets, both for domestic and international sales.
• Limited market information
• Limited availability of storage facilities
• Limited value addition• Ineffective use of commodity
exchange• Limited commercial farming and
unexploited by SME at domestic level
Edible Oils • Exported US$78.96 million of edible oils in 2015
• Accounted for 3.5 per cent of total exports in 2015
• Need for increased production to satisfy demand
• Avail inputs (cotton, sunflower seeds among others)
Sugar • Exports fluctuating around 100 metric Tonnes per year and in 2015 exported 124,619 MT
• Export earnings of $65.72 million • Registering second highest import value
(US$90.6 million in 2010)• Growth registered in sugarcane exports
(28.6 per cent in 2014/15)• 10 sugar factories operational
• EAC Economic integration issues including NTBs
Source: Compilation from MFPED BTTB and UBOS 2016
2.3.3 Light Manufacturing, Heavy Manufacturing and Extractive IndustriesLight manufacturing refers to the use of simple inputs in a production process which is taking place in a single location. Light manufacturing industries are more labour than capital intensive and outputs include consumer electronics, apparel, plastics and jua kali (micro-enterprises). Uganda’s light manufacturing sector is growing but remains characterized by a large number of informal and unregulated micro-enterprises (jua kali). With regard to heavy manufacturing, the sector is dominated by subsidiaries of multinational corporations that are capital intensive industries and require large initial investments. They commonly produce non-consumer oriented products such as steel or chemicals. Table 4 provides a breakdown of sub-sectors, the status and key issues in manufacturing.
10
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 4: Status and Key Issues in ManufacturingSector Subsector Status Key IssuesHeavy Manufacturing
Cement Three Producers (Tororo, Hima, Kampala)
• High energy costs• Competition from cheap imports
Steel & Iron Over 10 producers • Stiff competition from cheap imports
• Use of expensive imported raw materials
• High energy costs• Limited skilled labour
Construction • Infant local firms • Many informal firms • Few foreign owned
companies that dominate the market
• Unable to capture opportunities• Bureaucratic procurement and
contracting procedures• Price fluctuations of imported
materials• Lack of a sound legal and
institutional framework• Weak compliance enforcement
regimeLight Manufacturing
Plastics and Packaging
• 9 major producers• Significant growth
rate
• Competition from cheap imports and counterfeits
Foods and Beverages
• About 20 major processors
• High prevalence of informality
Processing • Big number of small processors
• Counterfeits• Cheap imports• Environmental issues from
NEMA etc.Pharmaceuti-cals
• 12 manufacturers• 901 private
pharmacies• 5,984 private drug
shops
• Competition from cheap imports• Inadequate skilled labour force• counterfeits
Extractive Industries
Oil & Gas • Refinery construction planned in Hoima
• Pipeline route mapped and pipeline under FEED13
• Limited skilled labour.• Local content policy
operationalisation.
Minerals • Large mineral deposits (iron ore, gold, vermiculite reserves, limestone, nickel, phosphates, etc.).
• More beneficiation required.• Significant unmet domestic
demand for steel and fertilizer.• Fake fertilizer on market.• Fertilizer factory set up in
Eastern Uganda and Fertilizer policy passed in 2016
• Low scale production of most of the minerals.
13Front End Engineering Design
11
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
2.4 Services SectorThe services sector in Uganda contributed 47.6% to GDP in FY 2014/15. It comprises the tourism sector, financial services, telecommunications, banking, real estate and other investments. The telecommunications and banking sectors have been described as generally sound and well regulated. The real estate sector continues to be dominated by high levels of informality. Table 5 summarises the status of services by subsector in Uganda.
Table 5: State of the Services by SectorSubsector Status Key IssuesTourism • 15 major tourists destinations
• Numerous Tour operators• One training centre• 61 hotels attained a star rating14
• Large unexploited potential• Limited marketing.• Limited skilled labour
forceTelecommunications • 5 major company operators.
• 24 Public Infrastructure Providers (PIP)
• 36 Public Service Provider (PSP) Voice and Data
• Over 22,973,902 subscribers (2015)15
• Dominated by foreign firms.
• Regulations are inadequate to cause change.
Banking • 25 commercial banks• Significant profit growth rates (17.2%
in 2014)• 4 Credit institutions• 4 Microfinance institutions• High average CBR (14% in 2015)16
• Low penetration in rural areas
• Limited growth in private sector credit
• High interest rates• Scarcity of long-term
finance to support industrialization and Agriculture.
• Limited products range.Real Estate • High Informality
• High cost of building material• Low effective demand
• Lack of a sound institutional and legal framework.
• Markets are highly speculative/ Missing markets.
Education • 5,763 Pre-primary schools (2015)• 18,889 Primary Schools with an
enrolment of 8,264,317 pupils. (63.8% Government, 2015)
• 1023 government and 1672 private secondary schools (2015).
• 167 Post primary institutions, 52% private owned in 2015.17
• Limited skills development• Inappopriate education
curriculum
14Uganda Tourism Board Statistics, 2015 15 Market Report for Third Quarter 2015, UCC16Bank of Uganda Statistics, 201517Education Statistical Abstract, 2015
12
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Subsector Status Key IssuesHealth • 155 hospitals (65 government owned,
63 private non-profit and 27 private)18• Low per capita healthcare
spending• High spending on treatment
abroad due to limited specialized care facilities.
• Inadequate human resources.
• No national health care schemes.
Creative and Performing Arts
• Dominated by small and infant firms• Significant local content
• Inadequate intellectual property rights
• High level of informality• Inadequate legal and
regulatory frameworksInsurance • 29 insurance companies
• 26 insurance brokers• 21 Loss Assessors 13 Health
Membership Organizations19
• Low penetration rates at 0.85% of the population
• Inadequate legal and regulatory frameworks.
• Unaffordable insurance services
• Inadequate awareness for public to appreciate insurance.
Source: Compiled by MFPED
2.4.1 Credit to the Private SectorSustainable credit growth is essential to a country’s economic transformation and growth. According to MoFPED (2015) credit to the private sector has continued to show a positive trend but at a decreasing rate, registering a GDP share of 15.2% in 2015 compared to 14.4% realised in 2014, 13.5% in 2013, 15.4% in 2011 and 11.6% in 2009. In FY 2014/15, private sector credit totalled UShs10.9747 billion (or 15.3% of GDP).20 A large share of credit to the private sector is provided by commercial banks (96%).21 Most loans issued are to the construction and building sector (23% of credit) and to households in form of personal loans (15%). Credit to the agricultural sector grew by 32.4% between June 2013 (Ush295.0 billion) and June 2014 (Ush390.6 billion22), with the majority of this credit (61.3%) going into agro-processing and marketing. Sectors that attracted less credit in the private sector include electricity, water, business development services, social services, mining and quarrying, as they require huge initial credit for investment. Nonetheless, mining and quarrying received mainly foreign financing, accounting for the sector with the largest Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) inflows.23
18Annual Health Sector Performance Report FY 2014/15, MoH19Annual Report 2014, Insurance Regulatory Authority20Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development 2015. Annual Economic Performance Report.21Bank of Uganda 2015. Statistics on Credit to Private Sector.22UBOS,201523Bank of Uganda 2014. Private Sector Investment Survey.
13
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 6: Sector Analysis of commercial credit to Private sector (UGX BNS)Sector 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Agriculture 1,050 2,396 2,331 3,556 5,189 5,706 7,092 9,362 11,686 Mining and Quarrying 261 152 152 342 225 359 357 352 575
Manufacturing 2,108 4,606 6,365 7,450 10,258 12,147 13,698 14,318 19,610 Trade 2,024 4,707 8,925 11,675 16,958 18,062 18,419 21,113 24,085 Transport and Communication 1,050 2,297 2,833 4,350 5,788 5,887 5,713 5,506 6,883 Electricity and Water 120 317 306 511 628 988 1,245 1,575 2,210 Building, Mortgage, Construction and Real Estate 1,489 5,441 7,369 10,453 15,711 20,166 21,485 24,647 29,482 Business Services - - - 1,816 3,420 3,809 4,440 4,608 5,890 Community, Social & Other Services - - - 1,600 2,513 3,029 2,920 3,568 4,158 Personal Loans and Household Loans 2,451 7,612 9,927 10,724 12,393 12,790 13,882 18,360 19,424 Other Services 3,730 7,345 6,423 3,362 4,022 4,017 5,238 2,351 1,789
Source: Bank of Uganda, 2016
Graph 5: Sectoral Shares of Credit to the Private Sector
4.4
0.1
0.5
35.2
6.1
0.2
12.0
4.8
3.5
30.9
2.3
6.7
0.1
0.7
31.6
5.3
0.1
12.3
4.6
4.5
30.6
3.6
9.4
0.1
3.0
32.8
5.4
0.1
9.5
5.4
4.3
27.4
2.7
12.7
0.0
2.1
33.0
5.1
0.0
9.7
6.5
3.3
25.3
2.2
15.4
0.2
0.7
32.3
5.1
0.1
9.8
8.1
2.7
24.3
1.3
17.3
0.4
0.5
27.1
4.9
0.1
9.0
8.7
4.0
25.8
2.0
Agriculture
Mining and Quarrying
Manufacturing
Trade
Transport and Communication
Electricity and Water
Building, Mortgage, Construction and Real Estate
Business Services
Community, Social & Other Services
Personal Loans and Household Loans
Other Services
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
Source: Bank of Uganda, 2016
Despite the growth of private sector credit to the various sectors (graph 5), corresponding output growth has not been realized. This can be attributed to credit benefitting the construction and building sector (23%), followed by personal loans (15%) whose returns and impact may manifest in the long term. Low production and value addition in the agriculture sector (only 10% value addition for cash crops) could be another factor.
In comparison to other EAC member states, Uganda had the highest commercial bank lending rate at 24.7 as per February 2016 (graph 6) while Kenya’s was at 18.3% and Tanzania approx. 17%. In Uganda the prime lending rates are at 23% of the principal and yet obtaining credit in foreign currency at an average of 10% is not sustainable with interest being paid in local currency.
14
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Graph 6: Annual Commercial Bank lending Treasury bill rate (%)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Commercial bank lending rates TBR (91 Day)
Source: Bank of Uganda, 2016
Graph 7 shows the relationship between exchange rates and private investments in Uganda. While private investments have been steadily increasing, the growth has not been high enough as expected. This was partly attributed to the weakening shilling in the international markets. In addition, high interest rates hinder many MSMEs from accessing finance, collateral on a higher share of loans is required, loan processing fees and short term loans are expensive to acquire. As stated earlier on, interest rates on loans in Uganda have been significantly higher in comparison with those of neighbouring countries. The main borrower from commercial banks is the state and some parastatals.
Graph 7: Private Investments (Ush bn) and Exchange Rates Trend.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0.00
500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
3,500.00
4,000.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Priv
ate
inve
stm
ent
Exc
hang
e ra
tes
Exchange rates (Ushs) Private investment (at constant 2002 prices) Ush Bn
Source: Bank of Uganda, 2016
In comparison with other countries (Mauritius 100%, South Africa 150% and Korea Republic 140%) on the global scene, the trends show that Uganda’s performance in credit provision to the private sector by 2014 is still very low (14%) which limits available capital for domestic investments (graph 8).
15
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Graph 8: Private Sector Contribution to GDP by Country
Source: World Development Indicators 2015
2.4.2 Professionalism and Skilling of EnterprisesUganda was ranked third in the world in terms of Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) at 36 per cent in 2012. In the previous years, the proportion of new businesses rose from 19 per cent in 2010 to 28 per cent in 2012, and the stock of established businesses increased from 27 to 31 per cent but with a high mortality rate currently at 26 per cent24.
Access to business development services such as training at different stages between infancy and maturity can sustain existing MSMEs. Government has undertaken to continue simplifying and enhancing business registration procedures in order to reduce the influence of business informalities in the economy. Initial steps have been taken through the establishment of an e-licensing portal at Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB) whose effective implementation should increase business formalization.
2.4.3 Linkages to Foreign Direct InvestmentsOver the years, there has been significant growth of FDI in Uganda making the country the second largest FDI recipient in the EAC region (graph 9). This has built investor confidence in Uganda as an international investment destination. Second to Tanzania, Uganda has managed to maintain the relatively high level of FDI inflows and stock. Its performance is on account of the development of its gas and mineral sectors with the highest FDI inflows in 2013 being registered in the mining and quarrying sectors, ICT, Finance and Insurance respectively.25
24Global Enterpreneurship Monitor 2012. GEM Uganda Exclusive Report. 25Bank of Uganda
16
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Graph 9: FDI Inflows in EAC (USD Millions)
Source: UNCTAD Database 2015
Graph 10: FDI Stock in EAC (USD Millions-Current)
Source: UNCTAD Database 2015
The continued increase in FDI inflows and accumulation of stocks is a positive signal of Government’s efforts in creating an investor friendly environment. However, the major challenge is how to ensure that FDI creates backward and forward linkages from these extractive industries to other sectors in the domestic economy.
2.4.4. EmploymentThe 2015 Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) ranked Uganda 27 out of 144 countries in terms of labour market efficiency. However, it ranked low in terms of pay and productivity (rank 126 out of 144), country capacity to attract talent (95 out of 144) and country capacity to retain talent (113 out of 144). These indicators are essential to ensuring a sustainable contribution of the private sector to efficiency in the labour market.
The level of skills development in Uganda is important for private sector growth and development.
17
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
The legal framework for vocational training and skills development in Uganda was strengthened by the Business and Vocational Education Training (BTVET) Act, 2008. The Act facilitated the operationalization of Skilling Uganda Strategy and was augmented by the Strategic Plan (2011-2020). The plan aims at providing industrial training, improving overall training quality and changing the negative attitudes towards technical and vocational education programmes to ultimately provide a more skilled labour force thus addressing the growing underutilization rate of youth labour.
Despite the ambitious objectives of the BTVET strategic plan, the impact of BTVET institutions on skills development was found to be minimal. Evidence shows that BTEVT graduates are an inappropriately skilled workforce, and 40 per cent of the main courses offered by BTVETs were found to be irrelevant.26 The 2014/15 results for the National BTVET assessment show a significant drop in the number of students enrolled.
2.4.5 Performance of ExportsGovernment has pursued various efforts aimed at enhancing Uganda’s access to regional and inter-national markets. These include: joining regional trading blocs such as the East African Commu-nity (EAC), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), in addition to seizing opportunities under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) with the European Union. Government has also formulated the National Trade Policy (NTP), Uganda National Export Strategy (NES) 2008 -2012 and the draft National Export Development Strategy (NEDS) 2015/16-2019/20 in addition to establishment of the Uganda Export Promotions Board (UEPB), to address domestic trade issues.
The NTP aims to develop and nurture private sector competitiveness and to support the productive sectors of the economy to trade at both domestic and international levels. The NEDS complements the NTP, articulating measures for expanding Uganda’s exports, and placing new ones in global markets. UEPB on the other hand aims to help Ugandan exporters in penetrating, establishing and expanding their presence in the target export markets.
Uganda’s trade deficit averaged US$ 2.8 billion over the NDP I period. This was largely on account of low value exports as well as higher government and private sector oil imports. The deterioration of the trade deficit was also driven by the services deficit, which deteriorated to US$710.18 million in FY 2014/15 from US$637.99 million in FY 2010/11 mainly on account of higher payments of government services related to infrastructure projects and declining tourism receipts. Graph 11 below provides highlights of Uganda’s Trade performance.
26Council for African Policy 2013. Uganda’s Education Policy Review. A Focus on the state of sklills development in the Teso region.
18
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Graph 11: Uganda’s International Trade performance ($)
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Imports Exports TradeBalance
Imports Exports TradeBalance
Imports Exports Total TradeBalance
Goods Services Goods & Services
US$
Mill
ion
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Source: Bank of Uganda Statistics
Uganda’s international trade performance, particularly with regard to export development has been affected by a number of constraints, namely: low production levels with limited value addition, un-competitive products and services, sub-optimal use of factors of production, inadequate finance for the exports sector and inadequate infrastructure for trade development, limited information and insti-tutional inadequacies.
2.4.6 Ease of Doing BusinessThe World Bank Ease of Doing Business (EDB) report 2016 ranked Uganda at 122th out of 189 countries, an improvement by 13 positions. Despite the progress, there is need for further reforms to attain a double digit rank. The improvement in the overall ranking can be attributed to mainly an increase in the ratings of resolving insolvency and trading across borders through consolidation of all provisions related to corporate insolvency in one law, which established provisions on the administration of companies (re-organization) and clarifying standards on the professional qualifications of insolvency.
In terms of trading across borders, the introduction of electronic systems in the submission of export and import documents has led to improvement reflected in the EDB reports. Significant efforts in fast-tracking the enactment of commercial laws, resulted in the formulation of several new laws since 2013, including the PFMA Act, 2015, Free Zones Act, 2014, Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2015, PPP Act among others.
Uganda’s Doing Business rank is based on 10 indicators (Table 7). Overall performance on most of the DB indicators continued to deteriorate in 2015. Businesses continue to face a plethora of licenses/permissions, and this remains one of the worst performing areas in the Doing Business indicators (Uganda’s DB rank for dealing with construction permits declined from 143 to 163 (DBR 2015). Other than that, the indicator of getting credit where Uganda’s rank deteriorated rapidly from 42nd in 2014 to 131st in 2015. In addition, its rank in DBR 2015 on protecting investors improved from 115 to 110. This is attributed to the Investment Code Act cap 92 of 1991 and revised /amended in 2013.
19
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 7: Uganda’s Ease of Doing Business RankingsIndicator rank 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Starting a Business 107 114 129 129 137 143 50 151 166Acquiring Construction Permits 110 81 81 84 133 109 183 143 163Getting Electricity 129 166 178 184Registering Property 166 163 167 149 150 127 149 126 125Getting Credit 159 158 109 113 46 48 23 42 131Protecting Minority Investors 60 122 126 132 132 133 117 115 110Paying Taxes 43 55 70 66 62 93 165 98 104Trading Across Borders 160 141 145 145 148 158 145 164 161Enforcing Contracts 71 119 117 116 113 116 42 117 80Resolving Insolvency 44 48 51 53 56 63 157 79 98Total 175 178 181 183 183 183 185 189 189
Notes:Reform making it easier to do business
Negative change in starting a businessSource: Doing Business Various Reports, World Bank
As discussed in section 2.4, most of formal credit to private sector is provided by commercial banks, which still rely heavily on collateral due to their inability to meet borrowers’ creditworthiness. This is hindrance to many Ugandans who do not have access to titled land and makes it impossible for them to obtain a formal loan. In this context, in 2008 Bank of Uganda (BoU) introduced a Credit Reference Bureau (CRB) to facilitate obtaining information on borrowers.
2.4.7 Legal and Regulatory ReformsOther efforts undertaken in the past include: Simplifying the company’s Act 2012, the New Partnership Act 2010, the Competition Law and Insolvency Act 2011, Consumer Protection Bill, and Copyright and Patent laws. There is need to put more effort towards ensuring an enabling legal and regulatory framework.
Despite these improvements in the mentioned indicators, progress has been slow or deteriorating in the following indicators: the ease of starting a business, getting electricity and dealing with construction permits. The reforms in 2011 and 2012 negatively impacted on the ease of starting a business due to increased licensing fees and time to process licenses. The current doing business report 2016 shows improvements due to the introduction of an online system for business registration. This requires Government to remain focused and follow up on legal developments in the economy and other countries and must avoid implementing reforms which lead to further deterioration in these indicators.
The Business Licensing Reform process emerged out of Cabinet’s directive in August 2013, and implementation of legal reforms will continue; through this process, 188 licenses have been successfully completed. 30 licenses are being drafted but pending at various stages, 102 licenses are ongoing.
The other key remaining challenge is access to and cost of electricity. Despite the improvements in procedures, access to electricity over the years, prices still remain high. Although the latest doing business report found that in 2015, there was reduction in delays for new electricity connections,
20
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
getting electricity remains one of the indicators in which Uganda performed worst (ranking 184 out of 189 countries).
2.4.8 Contribution to Tax RevenueIn a private sector led economy, enterprises play a significant role in economic growth and development through their contribution to total revenue among other things. There has been a slight increase in the tax-to-GDP ratio over the NDP I period. However Uganda’s performance still lags within the region with a tax-to-GDP ratio of 13% (FY 2014/15) compared to Kenya at 22%. A large part of tax revenue is still derived from international trade. This depicts a significant weakness in the domestic private sector’s contribution to tax revenue generation.
In the Ease of Doing Business Report, World Bank compares Uganda with other global economies and ranks Uganda 104 out of 189 countries. This is despite tax incentives granted by Government to companies, mainly in the agro processing and mining sector under Uganda Free Zone (UFZA) Act of 2014. It remains key to address informality of businesses in order to enhance private sector’s contribution to revenue generation. With regional integration, the harmonization of the taxation system plays an important role in this regard27. In order to increase registration, perceived burdens of tax administration should be substantially addressed.
Graph 12: Uganda’s Revenue Collection Performance
0.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
UShs
Bill
ion
Domestic Taxes Taxes on International trade
Source: Uganda Revenue Authority
In conclusion, the analysis reveals that the business environment in Uganda is a key component in promoting private sector growth and competitiveness. Deliberate efforts therefore ought to be made to enable the economy take hold of its opportunities, increase production and productivity for exports.
27African Development Bank 2013. Supporting the Transformation of the Private Sector in Africa. Private Sector Development Strategy 2013-2017.
21
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
The
follo
win
g ar
eas h
ave
been
iden
tified
to re
alis
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
gro
wth
.Ta
ble
8: K
ey A
reas
for
Impr
ovem
ent.
Indi
cato
r an
alys
edW
hat d
o w
e se
e?W
hat n
eeds
to c
hang
e?
Con
trib
utio
n of
di
ffer
ent s
ecto
rs
to G
DP
• D
omin
ance
of s
ervi
ces (
47.7
%),
follo
wed
by
agric
ultu
re (2
3.7%
) and
in
dust
ry (2
0.4%
). •
Agr
icul
ture
: dom
inat
ed b
y fo
od c
rops
• In
dust
ry is
dom
inat
ed b
y m
anuf
actu
ring
and
cons
truct
ion
• Se
rvic
es a
re d
omin
ated
by
trade
and
rep
airs
, pub
lic a
dmin
istra
tion
and
ICT
Stru
ctur
al tr
ansf
orm
atio
n is
slo
w. T
he G
DP
cont
ribut
ion
of se
ctor
s of t
he e
cono
my
rem
ains
larg
ely
unch
ange
d.a)
Incr
ease
d va
lue
addi
tion
in a
gric
ultu
re is
nee
ded
b) In
crea
se th
e con
tribu
tion
of m
anuf
actu
ring
in in
dust
rial
outp
uts
Info
rmal
vs.
Form
al S
ecto
r as
shar
e of
GD
P
• R
elat
ivel
y hi
gh c
ontri
butio
n of
info
rmal
sect
or to
GD
P •
Info
rmal
sec
tor
dom
inat
ed b
y ag
ricul
ture
, fol
low
ed b
y se
rvic
es a
nd
indu
stry
a) F
orm
alis
atio
n ne
eds t
o ha
ppen
fast
er in
the
serv
ices
sect
orb)
Dee
p an
alys
is a
nd u
nder
stan
ding
of i
nfor
mal
sect
orc)
Brid
ge th
e ga
ps b
etw
een
the
info
rmal
and
form
al
sect
ors,
thro
ugh
rem
oval
of b
ottle
neck
s and
ince
ntiv
ize
form
aliz
atio
nPr
ivat
e Se
ctor
C
redi
t (PS
C)
• Pr
ivat
e Se
ctor
Cre
dit g
row
th a
t 15.
3 pe
r ce
nt (
FY 2
014/
15),
driv
en
mai
nly
by h
ouse
hold
and
per
sona
l loa
ns.
• Li
mite
d ac
cess
to la
nd, c
redi
t is
still
ofte
n ba
sed
on c
olla
tera
l•
Larg
est s
hare
of
PSC
is a
lloca
ted
to b
uild
ing,
con
stru
ctio
n an
d re
al
esta
te (2
3%),
follo
wed
by
trade
(20%
) and
man
ufac
turin
g (1
5%) a
nd
pers
onal
and
hou
seho
ld lo
ans (
15%
)•
96%
of c
redi
t pro
vide
d by
com
mer
cial
ban
ks
a) C
apita
lise
UD
B to
pro
vide
long
term
cap
ital.
b) L
ower
the
cost
of b
usin
ess
for c
omm
erci
al b
anks
and
ad
dres
s driv
ers o
f cre
dit r
isks
c)
Nee
d of
Gov
ernm
ent
to b
e in
nova
tive
and
expl
oit
finan
cial
m
arke
t in
stru
men
ts
to
mob
ilize
lo
ng
term
fin
anci
ngd)
Impr
ove
dive
rsity
and
usa
ge o
f fina
ncia
l ins
trum
ents
Fore
ign
Dir
ect
Inve
stm
ent
(FD
I)
• Sl
ight
decr
ease
in 20
13, d
ue to
rein
vest
ed ea
rnin
gs an
d low
borr
owin
gs
from
affi
liate
d en
terp
rises
• La
rges
t co
ntrib
utio
n in
min
ing,
fina
ncia
l s
ervi
ces,
man
ufac
turin
g,
ICT,
ele
ctric
ity a
nd g
as se
ctor
s
a) N
eed
to c
reat
e ba
ckw
ard
linka
ges t
o do
mes
tic
indu
stry
from
FD
I infl
ows
b) C
arry
out a
n ag
gres
sive
cam
paig
n to
attr
act F
DI
22
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Indi
cato
r an
alys
edW
hat d
o w
e se
e?W
hat n
eeds
to c
hang
e?
Em
ploy
men
t C
reat
ion
by
priv
ate
sect
or
• M
ost e
mpl
oym
ent s
till i
n ag
ricul
ture
, for
estry
and
fish
ing
(71.
4%),
serv
ices
(21.
7%) a
nd m
anuf
actu
ring
(21.
7%)
• D
omin
ance
of s
elf-
empl
oym
ent (
>60%
). •
Yout
h: lo
w s
kills
, maj
orly
eng
aged
in p
rimar
y em
ploy
men
t, 9
out o
f 10
you
ths i
n no
n-ag
ricul
tura
l sec
tor a
re in
info
rmal
sect
or
a) N
eed
to a
ddre
ss e
mpl
oym
ent c
reat
ion
in a
gric
ultu
ral
sect
orb)
Tra
in la
bour
for s
kills
to im
prov
e pr
oduc
tion
and
prod
uctiv
ity.
c) P
rom
ote
and
stre
ngth
en in
tern
ship
sSh
are
of E
xpor
t ea
rnin
gs b
y se
ctor
• K
ey f
orei
gn e
xcha
nge
earn
er:
Agr
icul
tura
l se
ctor
, fo
llow
ed b
y m
anuf
actu
ring
• La
rge
earn
ing
loss
es d
ue to
info
rmal
exp
orts
a) P
rom
ote
valu
e ad
ditio
n in
agr
icul
ture
b) F
orm
alis
e an
d di
vers
ify e
xpor
tsc)
Exp
loit
regi
onal
mar
kets
d) F
ocus
on
man
ufac
turin
g fo
r com
petit
iven
ess.
Valu
e ad
ditio
ns•
Serv
ice
sect
or e
xper
ienc
ing
mos
t val
ue a
dditi
on•
Agr
icul
ture
: Va
lue
addi
tion
mos
tly h
appe
ning
in
food
cro
ps v
ery
limite
d, in
cas
h cr
ops
• In
dust
ry: d
omin
ated
by
valu
e ad
ditio
n fr
om m
anuf
actu
ring,
follo
wed
by
con
stru
ctio
n
a) P
rom
ote
valu
e ad
ditio
n En
sure
ver
tical
mob
ility
of
valu
e ch
ains
, fa
cilit
ate
busi
ness
es u
pgra
ding
tow
ards
hi
gher
val
ue a
dditi
on
Skill
s de
velo
pmen
t•
Incr
ease
in p
rimar
y an
d se
cond
ary
scho
ol e
nrol
men
t, bu
t dec
line
in
trans
ition
rate
s •
Poor
regi
onal
rank
ings
in te
rms o
f qua
lity
of e
duca
tion
• Vo
catio
nal
train
ing
(BTV
ET)
esta
blis
hed,
bu
t no
t ap
prec
iate
d,
rece
ntly
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s dec
reas
ed•
Hig
h le
vel o
f un
skill
ed la
bour
forc
e an
d lo
w p
rodu
ctiv
ity•
Insu
ffici
ent k
now
ledg
e of m
anag
ing
MSM
Es le
adin
g to
hig
h m
orta
lity
rate
a) E
nsur
e qu
ality
of
educ
atio
n an
d its
rol
e in
pra
ctic
al
skill
s pro
visi
onb)
Ince
ntiv
ise
tech
nica
l and
voc
atio
nal t
rain
ing
to a
ttrac
t th
e yo
uth
and
othe
rs in
labo
ur sk
illin
g.c)
Impr
ove
acce
ss to
BD
Sd)
Exp
lore
new
mod
els
such
as
fran
chis
ing
to e
nhan
ce
skill
s and
tech
nolo
gica
l tra
nsfe
r in
busi
ness
es.
e) A
ttitu
de a
nd m
ind
set c
hang
e to
war
ds v
ocat
iona
l tra
inin
g.
23
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Indi
cato
r an
alys
edW
hat d
o w
e se
e?W
hat n
eeds
to c
hang
e?
Priv
ate
sect
or
com
petit
iven
ess
• Im
prov
emen
t in d
oing
busi
ness
rank
ing,
but s
till l
aggi
ng in
com
paris
on
with
the
regi
on•
Impr
ovem
ent
in s
ome
indi
cato
rs:
regi
ster
ing
prop
erty
, pr
otec
ting
inve
stor
s, tra
ding
acr
oss
bord
ers,
enfo
rcin
g co
ntra
cts,
reso
lvin
g in
solv
ency
• D
eter
iora
tion
in t
erm
s of
acc
ess
to e
lect
ricity
, st
artin
g bu
sine
ss,
deal
ing
with
con
stru
ctio
n pe
rmits
• G
CI
reve
aled
pro
blem
s re
gard
ing
infr
astru
ctur
e an
d in
stitu
tions
, em
phas
ized
the
pos
itive
per
form
ance
in
term
s of
lab
our
- m
arke
t ef
ficie
ncy.
• Sl
ow p
erfo
rman
ce in
edu
catio
n, tr
aini
ng, a
nd in
nova
tion
a) N
eed
to fo
llow
up
on a
lread
y in
itiat
ed re
form
s inc
lud-
ing
Smal
l C
laim
s Pr
oced
ure,
Com
pute
rizat
ion
of c
ross
bo
rder
trad
e,
b) A
dopt
ing
onlin
e pr
oces
ses i
n pu
blic
serv
ices
c) I
mpr
ove
elec
trici
ty a
cces
s, bu
sine
ss r
egis
tratio
n an
d de
alin
g w
ith c
onst
ruct
ion
perm
its
Tax
reve
nue
gene
rate
d by
se
ctor
• In
crea
se in
tax
reve
nue
• Po
sitiv
e pe
rfor
man
ce in
cor
pora
tion
tax,
dec
reas
e in
PAY
E •
Dom
inan
ce o
f int
erna
tiona
l tra
de in
reve
nue
gene
ratio
n.
Impr
ove
tax
adm
inis
tratio
n an
d ex
pand
the
tax
base
, sc
alin
g up
the
Tax
Reg
istra
tion
Expa
nsio
n Pr
ogra
m
(TR
EP).
Savi
ngs t
o G
DP
ratio
Incr
ease
sinc
e 20
12, b
ut st
ill lo
wes
t sav
ings
rate
in th
e EA
C re
gion
.a)
Enc
oura
ge sa
ving
s cul
ture
and
min
dset
chan
ge to
war
ds
long
term
savi
ngs
b) E
nsur
e sa
ving
s are
rein
vest
ed.
c) S
uppo
rt di
ffere
nt s
avin
gs/fi
nanc
ing
inst
rum
ents
(i.e
. in
vest
men
t clu
bs, p
rivat
e eq
uity
and
ven
ture
cap
ital)
24
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENTThe private sector is pivotal to accelerating economic growth, reducing poverty and enhancing the quality of life, particularly through its contribution to revenue, employment creation, provision of services, and financing investments and social services. An assessment of the challenges currently facing the private sector highlights the need for improvement in a number of areas which include; factor productivity (labour, land); access to finance, business development services and capital, entrepreneurship and enterprise management, the share of the formal economy, innovations and level of value addition in production.
The NSPSD identifies required interventions in three areas; Macro, Meso, and Micro levels of the economy. The Macro interventions relate to creating an enabling business environment while the Meso is concerned with accelerating industrialization and improving market integration, and the Micro relates to firm/enterprise development.
This chapter outlines the national framework for private sector development with its essential elements: the vision, goals, objectives and high level policy impacts to be achieved. This is augmented by strategic benchmarks and the service and routine indicators against which to assess progress and performance in Chapter four.
3.1 The Vision, Goal and Objective of the StrategyThe NSPSD envisions a competitive and developing private sector that promotes inclusive growth for sustainable development. Its goal is to increase competitiveness of the private sector and enhance its contribution to Uganda’s sustainable economic development.
The NSPSD contributes to the NDP II goal of “attaining middle income status by 2020 through strengthening the country’s competitiveness for sustainable wealth creation, employment and inclusive growth”. The NSPSD aims to: Increase competitiveness of Uganda’s business environment and speed up the process of strengthening the links between Agriulture and Industry. Through a comprehensive and inclusive focused approach, it distinguishes itself from past strategies by identifying opportunities for all segments of the population and ensuring income distribution for prosperity to enable persons to move towards middle income status by 2020.
3.1.1 Projected Benchmark actions of the NSPSDThe interventions delivered through the NSPSD will contribute to the achievement of various Sector benchmarks in the mediums term as illustrated in Table 9 below.
25
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 9: A Sample of Projected Benchmarks Actions.Benchmark Required Action Responsible
MDALegal and Regulatory Benchmarks
i) Investment Code Amendment Act & Regulationsii) National Payment Policy & guidelinesiii) Draft principles for various law amendments to streamline 198 Business licensesiv) Formulate the National Irrigation Policy and guidelines
MFPEDMFPEDVarious MDAsMWE
Fiscal Policy Benchmarks
i) Annual Inflation at an average of 5% by 2021ii) GDP growth of 6.7% by 2021iii) Fiscal deficit as percentage of GDP (from 5%-3%) by 2021iv) Reduce domestic borrowing to Ush 485bn by 2021.v) Eliminate domestic arrears by 2021
MFPEDMFPEDMFPEDMFPEDMFPED
Institutional & Administrative Reforms Benchmarks
i) Establish One Stop Center by 2022ii) Establish 9 industrial parks by 2022 iii)Establish one EPZ Kawewetaiv) Recapitalize UDB by Shs 50bn per yearv) Increase power by 1,163 MW/HRvi) Construct an oil pipeline to Tanga by 2020vii) Construct 273km of SGR. (Eadtern route)viii) Retool 22% of the current Labs at UNBSix) Implement NEDS strategyx) Operationalise the National Commodity Exchange Platform (UNCEX)xi) Computerize 21 land Registries.xii) Construct and rehabilitate 15,000km DUCAR roadsxiii) Implement the Public Extension Service Strategyxiv) Operationalize Fertilizer Policyxv) Dispose upto 65% of case backlog in Commercial division
UIAUIAUFZAMFPEDUEGCMoW&TMoW&TUNBSMTICWHRAMoLH&UDMoLGMAAIFMAAIFMoJ&CA
Source: MFPED
3.1.2 The key objectives of the NSPSD
To achieve the overall objective the strategy will;a) Enhance coordination of Government and Non-Government efforts that promote private sector growth and competitiveness. By specifying the roles of Government and Non-Government actors in creating synergies that enhance the contribution of the private sector to Uganda’s economic development and transformation;b) Identify and address barriers that impede the Private Sector’s capacity to exploit market opportunities.c) Foster competitiveness of the Ugandan markets and attract increased domestic investment and FDI. d) Harness the Private Sector’s potential to foster socioeconomic transformation, particularly through increased entrepreneurship, innovation, productivity, employment creation, and value addition and skills development.
26
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Table 10: Selected development indicators to private sector developmentIndicator Baseline
(2012/13)NDPII Target 2040 Target
Per Capita IncomeShare of population below the National poverty lineGINI CoefficientManufactured exports (% of total exports)Savings (% of GDP)ICT goods & services (% of total exports)Electricity Consumption per capita (kWh)Innovation as measured by number of patients regis-teres per year% level of urbanizationLabour productivity GDP/worker($) in agricultureLabour productivity GDP/worker($) in industryLabour productivity GDP/worker($) in Services% of population access to electricity
$ 74319.7%
44.36%
20%6%80
N/A18%581
5,1062,44114%
$ 1,03314.8%0.45219%N/AN/A578N/AN/A978
7,8725,21830%
$ 9,5005.0%0.3250%35%40%
3,6686,00060%
6,79024,82025,513
80%
Source: NDP II, Vision 2040
3.2 Approach of the NSPSDThe NSPSD takes a service delivery focused approach and identifies crucial MDAs responsible for the delivery of services pertinent to PSD. As shown in graph 11below, it adopts a framework that addresses the constraints to private sector development at three different levels; Macro, Meso and Micro through a holistic approach with specific objectives and interventions. These pillars reinforce each other to achieve the Vision and broad objectives of the NSPSD. Thus, the strategy targets both the overall environment in which the private sector operates and recognizes the need to support the specific interventions through policy impact and strategic execution benchmarks.
27
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of the Strategy 2017/18-2021/22
Source: MFPED
41 | P a g e
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of the Strategy 2015/16-2020/21
Vision 2040 “Transformed Ugandan Society from a Peasantry to a Modern and Prosperous
Country within 30 years”
NDP II PSD Objective (s)
NPSDS Vision “A competitive and developing Private
Sector that promotes inclusive growth for sustainable economic development”
Micro-Pillar "Increase Profitability
and Growth of Enterprise"
1. Enhance factor productivity. 2. Formalisation and professionalism of SMEs. 3. Increase access to finance.
Meso-Pillar "Accelerate
Industrialisation"
1. Increase Business to Business linkages. 2. Upward mobility along industrial Value Chain. 3. Improve quality assurance.
Macro-Pillar "Boost Investor
Confidence"
1. Improve Macroeconomic Environment. 2. Enhance Legal and Regulatory framework. 3. Infrastructure expansion and maintenance. 4. Increase market efficiencies. 5. Entrepreneurship and skills development.
28
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
3.2.1 Macro PillarAt the Macro level, the NSPSD aims to achieve increased investor confidence to facilitate increased domestic and foreign direct investment. To achieve this objective, the strategy shall focus on the fol-lowing specific objectives.
Specific objectives
a) Improve Macro Economic EnvironmentThe success of the NSPSD is dependent on Government’s ability to sustain macroeconomic stability. Political and macro-economic stability are essential elements in boosting investor confidence. Between 2010/11, Uganda’s economy was exposed to external economic shocks that have particularly manifested in volatility in the foreign exchange rates and poor performance of exports, which undermine the competitiveness of the private sector. The economy also reveals significant high import content of inputs for Uganda’s industrial and other sectors.
To address this challenge, attention will be focused on:i. Increasing foreign exchange earnings: government will promote an export led development strategy in order to boost export earnings and FDI inflows. ii. Ensuring prudent fiscal and macroeconomic managementiii. Ensuring a conducive interest rate regime through monetary policy
b) Enhance Legal and Regulatory FrameworkGovernment embarked on reforming policies, commercial laws and regulations. The reforms aim to make the laws and other provisions simpler, more accessible, modern, fairer and cost-effective for the private sector. In regard to commercial laws, the reform has resulted in the enactment of Companies Act 2012, Partnership Act 2010, and the Insolvency Act 2011. A proposal on Competition law is still under review.
Further improvement will be realized through:i. Business Licensing and Regulatory Reforms. This includes fast tracking construction approvals;
removing inefficient, unnecessary, unfriendly and cumbersome licensing, improving business registration, land administration and tax administration. Out of the 766 licenses identified for reconsideration, the principles in the total of 307 licenses will be drafted to amend the respective laws. This will reduce the regulatory costs associated with these licenses thus reducing the cost of doing business.
ii. Establishment of One-Stop Centre (OSC) at UIA for inter-agency business facilitation. For effective implementation, NSPSD support will include technical assistance in setting up the secretariat, studies on the integration of the licensing systems into OSC, and benchmarking with other fast developing economies.
c) Infrastructure Expansion and MaintenanceThe poor quality of physical infrastructure leads to high costs of businesses, decreases their competitiveness and restricts access to local and international markets. Evidence shows that poor physical infrastructure reduces national economic growth in developing countries by two percentage points every year and cuts business productivity by as much as 40 percent. Uganda still faces a large infrastructural deficit, whereby the proportion of paved roads to total road network was at 23% by 2016/17. Similar trends are observed in electricity, with 20% of the population connected to the national grid.28 The high prices for electricity and transport increase the cost of doing business rendering investment less attractive. Establishment of well-developed infrastructure would therefore accelerate the exploitation of trade, agriculture and business opportunities within the economy. 28Government of Uganda 2015. National Development Plan II 2015/16-2019/20.UBOS 2015
29
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
The NSPSD accordingly aims to:
i. Strengthen and monitor government efforts relating to policy regulation and public investments in infrastructure with a focus on transport (airways, water, roads and railway) and electricity. ii. Continue to streamline local content in public procurement on infrastructure projects to support the domestic private sector.
d) Increase Market EfficiencesThe strategy recognizes the need to improve market efficiency in order to increase Uganda’s competitiveness and improve its domestic revenue position. Market efficiency is mainly constrained by low production and productivity levels in agriculture, limited storage facilities, counterfeits and limited value addition. At the regional level, Uganda will take advantage of its membership in various regional trade agreements under the EACOM (East African Common Market) and COMESA Free Trade Area to increase its market access and neutralize the negative effects that arise from its landlinked position. The EAC ministry in co-ordination with relevant MDAs will continue to engage and fast track the effort of elimination of Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in the EAC which is identified as one of the areas that increase the cost of doing business.
Government will also embark on harmonization of standards locally and at regional level. Elimination of counterfeits will be through the Counterfeits law, and effective implementation of the commodity market exchange to provide a warehouse receipt system. The latter will reduce on post-harvest losses, promote price discovery and improve quality and quantity. This will ultimately boost prices and competitiveness in businesses.Other interventions will include facilitating the development of the financial markets through a ten year Uganda Capital Markets Development Master Plan and the completion of a computerized land registration system.
e) Entrepreneurship and SkillsThe NDPII is cognizant of human capital and infrastructure development as fundamentals in realization of socio-economic transformation. The private sector in Uganda is constrained by a low skilled workforce making it difficult for businesses to find qualified labour. Cognizant of the gaps created by the type of education under primary and secondary schools which does not provide necessary skills for business performance, the BTVET Strategic Plan for 2012/13-2021/22 aims at the provision of industrial training, improvement in overall training quality and changing negative mind-sets on Vocational and Technical Training. However, continuous assessment of the current BTVET strategy shows that programme services are still not well appreciated and utilized and enrolment rates have dropped. In this strategy, focus will be on:
i. Improving the quality of vocational training, education, entrepreneurship in both school and vocational training institutions.
ii. Building capacity of entrepreneurship trainers through Business Development Services and Skills development.
iii. Mind-sets change through awareness campaigns and a joint communication strategy with the relevant subsectors.
iv. Creating awareness of BTVET opportunities to enhance uptake/enrolment.
30
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
3.2.2 Meso Pillar: Accelerate Industrialization
Government recognizes industrial development as an integral part of Uganda’s development agenda. At Meso level, the NSPSD prioritizes interventions for accelerating the development of competitive industries in tandem with Uganda’s National Industrial Policy (2008-2018).Uganda’s industrial sec-tor is relatively small with an average contribution of approximately 20.7% to GDP over the NDP I period. A vibrant industrial sector is critical for Uganda’s progress towards a sustainable development path through widening the tax base, offering employment opportunities, higher export earnings and increased productivity.
Industrialization can be achieved through manufacturing and adding value by processing to reduce post-harvest losses and by increasing exports of higher value products, especially from agricultural and mineral resources among other things.29 The NSPSD thus emphasizes the need to specifically consolidate and direct efforts that facilitate industrial development in the country towards attaining the overall goal of a more competitive private sector for sustainable economic development. NSPSD therefore aims to;
a) Increase Business to Business linkages(B2B)Research by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) shows that business linkages, both between Trans-national Corporations (TNCs) and domestic businesses present a possibility for businesses to increase their professionalism and acquire critical assets to improve their competitiveness.30 Therefore, the NSPSD will:i. Foster Government’s efforts towards improving the business environment. The promotion
of Uganda as an investment destination and the identification of strategic industries for investment will be critical to ensure sufficient linkages to the local economy. The choice of priority sectors for investment shall be linked to their potential to create linkages with local SMEs, with particular emphasis on agro processing sector.
ii. Follow the cluster development approach taken in NDP II to foster enterprise survival and development, and graduate to higher levels of industrialization. A data base yet to be created under the MSME policy will play a critical role for facilitating the establishment of business to business linkages.
iii. Support the building of infrastructure in the four regional industrial parks out of the 22 ear-marked for the country. The four parks and the existing ones of Kampala Industrial Business Park (KIBP), Bweyogerere and Luzira Parks will be fully operationalized through private and PPP arrangements. Kaweweta Free Zones Park will also benefit from infrastructure provision in order to create an enabling environment for investors.
b) Facilitate upward mobility along the industrial value chainOver the NDPI period, the value adding subsectors have performed poorly. Agriculture and fisheries contribution to industry GDP decreased by -2.8% (2010/11: 26.5%) and that of industry remained stagnant (2010/11: 20.4%). The contribution of manufacturing to industry decreased by 3.1% (2010/11: 50.2%). For sustainable economic development, a strong industrial sector is critical to ensure sufficient revenue generation, employment creation and access to markets. Therefore this strategy advocates for vertical mobility along the value chains to increase value addition.
i. Key emphasis will be directed to agro-processing, manufacturing and cottage industries, which remain the major employers in the economy. The National Export Development Strategy (NEDS), outlines required strategic actions to be undertaken by government to support value addition in the priority sectors identified in NDP II. The NSPSD will ensure that the NEDS is prioritised and implemented.
29Government of Uganda 2008. National Industrial Policy.30United Nations Conference for Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2010. Creating Business Linkages. A Policy Perspective.
31
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
ii. A critical component to increased mobility along the industrial value chain is the level of skills in the respective enterprises to enable them move towards higher value addition. The strategy will focus on improving access to BDS through support of the providers for increase of management professionalism in enterprises and reduction in information gap between SMEs and large enterprises.
c) Improve quality assuranceThe verification of product quality plays a critical role for both imports and exports. At the import level, quality assurance is essential to avoid counterfeit and low quality products. This is a major problem in the agricultural sector, where counterfeit fertilizers and other inputs continue to gain access to the market.
In terms of market access the credibility of product certifications can critically influence the demand for Ugandan products. Both the ease of standardizing production and awareness about its necessity play an important role. The NSPSD will:
i. Ensure further support to UNBS in its effort to certify Ugandan products and to verify import product quality through the Pre-Export Verification of Conformity mechanism. Within this context a critical constraint arises out of the understaffing at border posts, which essentially affects its effectiveness in fighting counterfeits. The NSPSD thus advocates for increasing staff at unmanned border posts.
ii. In addition to input verification mechanisms through text messages, there is need for private sector players to form distributor input associations/platforms for purposes of monitoring and eliminating counterfeits.
iii. Improve access to certification services by raising awareness among businesses to certify products as they graduate towards higher levels of value addition.
3.2.3 Micro Pillar: Increase Profitability and Growth of EnterprisesUganda’s private sector is characterized by a large number of MSMEs. These are estimated at 1,100,100 enterprises and account for the majority of private sector activities. Most of the MSMEs employ less than five people, lack adequate skills of management and access to finance which leads to a high mortality rate. The strategy advocates for a special focus on enhancing the profitability and growth potential of enterprises at this level, to that end, the strategy aims to advance the measures below:
a) Enhance factor productivityEvidence shows that factor productivity and productivity in general for Uganda is comparatively low within the EAC region. For example, in the agriculture sector, the value added per worker is the second lowest in the region at US $ 214.7. Uganda is also quoted to be one of the lowest users of fertilizer in the world. For instance Uganda uses only 2.2kg per ha compared to Kenya at 52.5 kg per ha.31 Results on latest improvement in harvests in Uganda show that this is due to increase in acreage rather than productivity. Access to physical infrastructure is also identified as a key constraint to productivity.32 Inappropriate work ethics, the formal education system, inappropriate skills, low investment in training, lack of training incentives and schemes are identified to be the main reasons for low labour productivity. The Strategy will therefore emphasize the following:
i) Provision of quality inputs and appropriate technology by the private sector with targeted incentives from government and enforcement of standards by the appropriate bodies.
32World Bank 2015. World Development Indicators Database.33African Development Bank 2014
32
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
ii) Training and mentoring a skilled labour force through the education system curriculum and by the private sector in case of mentorship.iii) Promote Research and Development (RD) of appropriate technology, use of ICT and high yielding agricultural varieties. This strategy recognizes the need to have mechanisms in place to boost adoption of R&D products.iv) Reviving and formation of producer organizations to facilitate access to markets, training, finance and quality improvements, bargaining power and uptake of volumes.v) Land administration reform to improve the attractiveness of Uganda as investment destination while protecting the land rights of local communities. Sound land policies can facilitate growth in agricultural productivity via secure land tenure. Significant opportunities could open up for the development of a number of sectors, including manufacturing. Currently, manufacturing firms in Uganda lack access to serviced industrial land. This poses a significant handicap in making Industrial Parks and Export Processing Zones (EPZs) operational. vi) Cross cutting issues that influence factor productivity such as HIV/ AIDS with prevalence rate of 7.3% in 2014, malaria, gender and environment etc. will be addressed through the relevant MDAs in their sectors.
b) Professionalism of SMEsThe economy is still predominantly informal and this substantially affects productivity and survival of businesses. The informality of businesses is essentially influenced by constraints in business registration, negative perception and mind-set, low level of tax education and inadequate law enforcement. Formalization of businesses will boost revenue generation at all levels. The Strategy will focus on:
i. Full implementation of a One Stop Centre both physical and online at UIA to facilitate formalization and registration of businesses.ii. Instituting a joint communication strategy by major playersiii. Providing Business Development Services (BDS) and support BDS providers, with special emphasis on entrepreneurship training, business advisory and counselling service, information access, business planning, marketing, technology access, business linkages and other services to assist both start-ups and existing businesses.
c) Increasing access to credit finance The National Small Business Survey 2015 identifies access to finance as one of the major constraints to the private sector in Uganda. 33Despite an increase of private sector credit (14.4% of GDP in FY 2014/15), Uganda’s share of domestic credit to GDP still remains low compared to other countries like Mauritius and South Africa. About 70% of the loans are accounted for by; households: (28.5%), building and construction (21.4), and trade credit (20.1%)-(UBOS 2015). This structure of loans for investment has minimal positive impact on creation of employment. Few, low grade and temporary jobs are likely to be generated.
Another challenge arises from the high risk portfolio of borrowers and the low savings ratio, fluctuating between 12%-15% over the last ten years. It still remains below the average of 23.6%for low income countries.34 This in turn leads to high interest rates charged by banks. Lack of required collateral including titled land, from most MSMEs further limits access to finance. There are on-going efforts by government to increase the share of titled land. Key among them is the on-going computerization of the land registry and Land Information Management System.
33Financial Deepening 2015. National Small Business Survey. 34Government of Uganda 2015: National Development Plan II 2015/16-2019/20
33
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Syndicating the existing Credit Reference Bureaus with National Identity Numbers of clients will also go a long way in improving access to the borrowers’ profiles. From this perspective, the strategy will therefore focus on:
i. Creating alternative forms of financing by promoting and formalizing investment clubs as a source of raising domestic capital for investment and essentially increasing personal savings. Mind-set change on savings is critical to reverse low savings in Uganda which are relatively low within the EAC region.ii. Fast tracking land registration to increase the stock of titled land, which will not only increase access to credit but also substantially reduce the cost of doing business.iii. Improving the stock market environment as a potential avenue to mobilize resources and channel them into productive sectors.iv. Fast tracking and implementing the Chattels Securities Act, 2014.v. In Public Procurement promote Buy Uganda Build Uganda (BUBU) policy in public procurement.vi. Provide long term finance through Uganda Development Bank Limited.
34
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTSThis Chapter addresses the Institutional arrangements for implementing the Private Sector Development Strategy (NSPSD 2017/18-2021/22). The Implementation Strategy of the NSPSD is defined by two main features: a Strategic Execution Matrix (SEM) that defines specific Structural Benchmarks for sectors and the Service Delivery Matrix which prioritizes Service Delivery indicators for the respective MDAs as detailed in table 14 in the annex.
The Strategic Execution Matrix (Table 11) spells out the crucial benchmarks for each of the identified MDAs, to be achieved within the five year NSPSD implementation period. In line with the service delivery focused approach, a detailed Service Delivery Matrix (Table 14) outlining services and routine deliverables has also been developed indicating the relevant MDAs and their required contribution to the NSPSD implementation. All identified MDAs are expected to mainstream actions and resource requirements of the NSPSD in their respective MTEFs and Plans over the medium term.
4.1 Coordination of Implementation ModalitiesMinistry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development will play a monitoring and facilitative role in the effective implementation of the Strategy and the respective MDAs will be required to mainstream issues of Private Sector Development in their mandates.
A Multi Stakeholder Private Sector Working Group (PSWG) will be formed comprising of key MDAs, Private Sector, Advocacy Institutions, Civil Society Organisations(CSO), Development Partners, Research and Development (R&D), Academic and Training Institutions.
The NSPSD will be operationalised through the annual budgeting process using the outcome-based budgeting approach under the newly adopted Programme-Based Budget structure. In line with the objectives of the Strategy, thematic working groups will provide technical expertise to the PSWG. The Private Sector Development Unit(PSDU) under the Ministry of Finance, Planning & Economic Development (MFPED) will be the Secretariat.
4.2 Key Performance BenchmarksThere are a number of outstanding issues that have to be addressed to spur private sector development. These have been attributed to different MDAs that were identified to play a vital role in facilitating private sector development. To that end, the SEM (Table 11) outlines the crucial benchmarks for the identified MDAs. These benchmarks need to be achieved within the five year implementation period of the strategy. The SEM also contains indicators to measure the achievement of benchmark actions and the means of verification.
4.3 Monitoring and EvaluationThe Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development will be responsible for Monitoring and Evaluation(M&E) of this strategy. In the interest of rationalizing costs and systematizing operations, the M&E framework for the NSPSD will consist of a combination of existing mechanisms, processes and indicators informed by the Theory of Change (TOC) or Logical Framework. Routine activities will be monitored and feedback escalated to effect changes appropriately. The M&E framework will ensure that all outputs of the strategy are implemented, measured and reported quarterly, semi-annually and annually. A midterm review and final evaluation of the strategy will be conducted in 2020 and 2023, respectively.
35
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Tabl
e 11
: Str
ateg
ic E
xecu
tion
Mat
rix
MD
AB
ench
mar
k ac
tions
Veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Ban
k of
Uga
nda
Dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t a le
gal a
nd
regu
lato
ry fr
amew
ork
for p
aym
ents
and
se
ttlem
ents
• Pr
ogre
ss ra
te
• N
umbe
r of
peo
ple
usin
g C
RB
s• B
oU p
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
Kam
pala
City
Cou
ncil
Aut
hori
tyLo
cal E
cono
mic
Dev
elop
men
t stra
tegy
Ex
pans
ion
of p
ublic
tran
spor
t•
Loca
l Eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
stra
tegy
in p
lace
• Th
ree
flyov
ers c
onst
ruct
ed
• Min
iste
rial P
olic
y St
atem
ent
Min
istr
y of
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ent
Coo
rdin
atio
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of T
ax
paye
rs R
egis
tratio
n E
xpan
sion
Pro
ject
• N
umbe
r of
taxp
ayer
s reg
iste
red
thro
ugh
TREP
UR
A d
ata
Min
istr
y of
Fin
ance
Pl
anni
ng a
nd E
cono
mic
D
evel
opm
ent
Ope
ratio
naliz
e PF
M A
ct (2
015)
Incr
ease
cap
italiz
atio
n of
UD
B
• W
ork
plan
s sub
mitt
ed b
y in
tern
al
audi
tors
• Su
bmis
sion
of h
alf y
ear
cons
olid
ated
fisc
al st
atem
ents
to
PS/S
T by
Acc
ount
ant g
ener
al•
Am
ount
of e
quity
inje
cted
to
UD
B
Rep
orts
and
wor
k pl
ans r
ecei
ved
by P
S/ST
Fina
ncia
l Rel
ease
s
Min
istr
y of
Gen
der,
Lab
our
and
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
Esta
blis
h a
netw
ork
of
empl
oym
ent b
urea
us•
Num
ber
of e
mpl
oym
ent b
urea
us
oper
atio
nal
• N
o. o
f peo
ple
findi
ng jo
b th
roug
h em
ploy
men
t bur
eaus
Min
iste
rial P
olic
y St
atem
ent
Min
istr
y of
Lan
ds, H
ousi
ng
and
Urb
an D
evel
opm
ent
Com
pute
rizat
ion
of la
nd re
gist
ry
Dep
loym
ent o
f Nat
iona
l Lan
d In
form
atio
n Sy
stem
• La
nd re
gist
ry e
serv
ices
op
erat
iona
l•
Num
ber o
f sub
mis
sion
s for
re
ques
ting
land
title
s mad
e on
line
• Ti
me
and
cost
s•
Num
ber
of r
egio
nal l
and
man
agem
ent I
nfor
mat
ion
syst
em
esta
blis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal
Land
regi
stry
dat
a ba
nkPr
ogre
ss re
port
Min
istr
y of
Tra
de, I
ndus
try
and
Coo
pera
tives
Full
impl
emen
tatio
n of
MSM
E Po
licy
by
MSM
E di
rect
orat
e•
MSM
E po
licy
and
stra
tegy
im
plem
enta
tion
rate
• M
SME
data
bas
e es
tabl
ishe
d•
Num
ber
of c
omm
erci
al o
ffice
rs
recr
uite
d an
d de
ploy
ed
Min
iste
rial P
olic
y St
atem
ent
GA
PRD
evel
op st
rate
gies
to im
prov
e va
lue
addi
tion
for 1
2 pr
iorit
y co
mm
oditi
esD
eplo
ymen
t of D
istri
ct C
omm
erci
al
Offi
cers
at t
he d
istri
cts a
nd e
mba
ssie
s
36
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
MD
AB
ench
mar
k ac
tions
Veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Min
istr
y of
Wat
er a
nd
envi
ronm
ent
Fina
lize
Nat
iona
l Irr
igat
ion
Polic
y•
Impl
emen
tatio
n ra
te o
f Nat
iona
l Ir
rigat
ion
Polic
yM
inis
teria
l Pol
icy
Stat
emen
t
Min
istr
y of
Wor
ks a
nd
Tran
spor
t & U
gand
a R
ailw
ays C
orpo
ratio
n (U
RC
)
Com
plet
ion
of S
tand
ard
Gau
ge R
ailw
ay•
Num
ber o
f km
cov
ered
• Pe
rcen
tage
of p
rogr
ess
Stat
us p
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
NIT
A-U
Com
plet
ion
of N
atio
nal B
ackb
one
Infr
astru
ctur
e Pr
ojec
t (N
BI)
• Pr
ogre
ss ra
te o
f NB
IN
ITA
-U P
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
Uga
nda
Exp
ort P
rom
otio
n B
oard
Rev
iew
and
impl
emen
t Nat
iona
l Exp
ort
Stra
tegy
• Pr
ogre
ss im
plem
enta
tion
rate
of
NED
SPr
ogre
ss re
ports
Uga
nda
Free
Zon
es
Aut
hori
tyO
pera
tiona
lize
Kaw
ewet
a Fr
ee z
one
• In
fras
truct
ure
in K
awew
ete
Free
Zo
ne in
pla
ceU
FZA
Pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Indu
stri
al R
esea
rch
Inst
itute
Esta
blis
h tw
o re
gion
al h
ubs o
n ST
I (Sc
i-en
ce T
echn
olog
y an
d In
nova
tion)
• N
umbe
r. of
hub
s est
ablis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal
• N
umbe
r of g
radu
ate
incu
bate
es
UIR
I pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Inve
stm
ent
Aut
hori
tyEs
tabl
ish
and
oper
atio
naliz
e fo
ur re
gion
al
indu
stria
l par
ksFu
lly o
pera
tiona
lize
the
one
stop
cen
tre
• N
umbe
r of
indu
stria
l par
ks
esta
blis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal
• O
ne st
op c
entre
fully
ope
ratio
nal
UIA
pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Rev
enue
Aut
hori
tyLi
nkin
g TI
N a
nd N
atio
nal I
Ds
• To
be
disc
usse
dTo
be
disc
usse
dFu
lly im
plem
ent t
he T
REP
Pro
gram
me
• A
nnua
l gro
wth
in T
ax p
ayer
re
gist
ryTR
EP p
erfo
rman
ce re
ports
War
ehou
se R
ecei
pt
Aut
hori
tyEs
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd o
pera
tiona
lizat
ion
of
regi
onal
war
ehou
ses
• N
umbe
r of
war
ehou
ses
oper
atio
nal
War
ehou
se R
ecei
pt A
utho
rity
prog
ress
repo
rtO
pera
tiona
lize
Uga
nda
com
mod
ities
ex
chan
ge•
Volu
me
of c
omm
oditi
es tr
aded
Esta
blis
hmen
t of a
com
mod
ity d
ata
base
• D
ata
base
in p
lace
Vis
ion
2040
“Tra
nsfo
rmed
Uga
ndan
Soc
iety
from
a P
easa
nt to
a M
oder
n an
d Pr
ospe
rous
Cou
ntry
with
in 3
0 ye
ars”
ND
P II
PSD
Obj
ectiv
e (s
)
PSD
S V
isio
n“A
com
petit
ive
and
deve
lopi
ng P
rivat
e Se
ctor
that
pro
mot
es in
clus
ive
grow
th fo
r sus
tain
able
eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent”
Mes
o-Pi
llar
"Acc
eler
ate
Indu
stri
alis
atio
n"
1. In
crea
se b
usin
ess t
o bu
sine
ss li
nkag
es.
2. U
pwar
d m
obili
ty a
long
indu
stria
l val
ue c
hain
.3.
Impr
ove
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
.
Mac
ro-P
illar
"Boo
st In
vest
or C
onfid
ence
"
1. Im
prov
e m
acro
econ
omic
env
ironm
ent.
2. E
nhan
ce le
gal a
nd re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
k.3.
Infr
astru
ctur
e ex
pans
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
.4.
Incr
ease
mar
ket e
ffici
enci
es.
5. E
ntre
pren
eurs
hip
and
skill
s dev
elop
men
37
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
4.2 Service Delivery Outcomes and TargetsIn its implementation, the NSPSD takes a unique Service-delivery focused approach. Table 14 below, presents the services and routines delivered by the different MDAs structured along the framework of the NSPSD.
The analysis was conducted across the three Pillars of the strategy, Macro, Meso and Micro Pillars.The analysis focused on various objectives under each pillar to enable identification of services under MDAs, pertinent to private sector development. Service routine indicators were developed and measured at a baseline stage (FY 2014/15). Targets for the end period of the strategy (2019/20) were populated in consultation with the respective MDAs and various relevant Government documents.
4.3 Risk AssessmentThis Strategy is built on a number of assumptions. However, there are systemic risks that are likely to be associated with these assumptions, which, if not controlled, would compromise the success of the Strategy. These risks together with their mitigation measures are highlighted in Table 12 below.There are both general assumptions referring to the context in which the NSPSD is implemented as well as specific assumptions behind the respective objectives.
4.4 The Role of Public SectorThe role of the public sector in implementation of the NSPSD is both generic and specific. The general role will include:
a) Ensuring a conducive policy and legal regime;b) Providing the necessary public infrastructure; c) Facilitating structured and evidence-based stakeholder dialogue; andd) If and where appropriate, undertake investments in partnership with the private sector.
The specific role of Government will be to drive execution through a push for results and problem solving. A dedicated team of officials from within the existing establishment of Government will be charged with this function.
4.5 The Role of the Private Sector.Consistent with the goal of the NSPSD - to increase competitiveness of the private sector and enhance its contribution to Uganda’s sustainable economic development – the private sector is expected to seize business opportunities by deploying its entrepreneurial acumen and resources with a sense of professionalism. It is expected to identify, mobilize and target financial and human resources to drive firm growth and development.
MD
AB
ench
mar
k ac
tions
Veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Min
istr
y of
Wat
er a
nd
envi
ronm
ent
Fina
lize
Nat
iona
l Irr
igat
ion
Polic
y•
Impl
emen
tatio
n ra
te o
f Nat
iona
l Ir
rigat
ion
Polic
yM
inis
teria
l Pol
icy
Stat
emen
t
Min
istr
y of
Wor
ks a
nd
Tran
spor
t & U
gand
a R
ailw
ays C
orpo
ratio
n (U
RC
)
Com
plet
ion
of S
tand
ard
Gau
ge R
ailw
ay•
Num
ber o
f km
cov
ered
• Pe
rcen
tage
of p
rogr
ess
Stat
us p
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
NIT
A-U
Com
plet
ion
of N
atio
nal B
ackb
one
Infr
astru
ctur
e Pr
ojec
t (N
BI)
• Pr
ogre
ss ra
te o
f NB
IN
ITA
-U P
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
Uga
nda
Exp
ort P
rom
otio
n B
oard
Rev
iew
and
impl
emen
t Nat
iona
l Exp
ort
Stra
tegy
• Pr
ogre
ss im
plem
enta
tion
rate
of
NED
SPr
ogre
ss re
ports
Uga
nda
Free
Zon
es
Aut
hori
tyO
pera
tiona
lize
Kaw
ewet
a Fr
ee z
one
• In
fras
truct
ure
in K
awew
ete
Free
Zo
ne in
pla
ceU
FZA
Pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Indu
stri
al R
esea
rch
Inst
itute
Esta
blis
h tw
o re
gion
al h
ubs o
n ST
I (Sc
i-en
ce T
echn
olog
y an
d In
nova
tion)
• N
umbe
r. of
hub
s est
ablis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal
• N
umbe
r of g
radu
ate
incu
bate
es
UIR
I pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Inve
stm
ent
Aut
hori
tyEs
tabl
ish
and
oper
atio
naliz
e fo
ur re
gion
al
indu
stria
l par
ksFu
lly o
pera
tiona
lize
the
one
stop
cen
tre
• N
umbe
r of
indu
stria
l par
ks
esta
blis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal
• O
ne st
op c
entre
fully
ope
ratio
nal
UIA
pro
gres
s rep
orts
Uga
nda
Rev
enue
Aut
hori
tyLi
nkin
g TI
N a
nd N
atio
nal I
Ds
• To
be
disc
usse
dTo
be
disc
usse
dFu
lly im
plem
ent t
he T
REP
Pro
gram
me
• A
nnua
l gro
wth
in T
ax p
ayer
re
gist
ryTR
EP p
erfo
rman
ce re
ports
War
ehou
se R
ecei
pt
Aut
hori
tyEs
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd o
pera
tiona
lizat
ion
of
regi
onal
war
ehou
ses
• N
umbe
r of
war
ehou
ses
oper
atio
nal
War
ehou
se R
ecei
pt A
utho
rity
prog
ress
repo
rtO
pera
tiona
lize
Uga
nda
com
mod
ities
ex
chan
ge•
Volu
me
of c
omm
oditi
es tr
aded
Esta
blis
hmen
t of a
com
mod
ity d
ata
base
• D
ata
base
in p
lace
Vis
ion
2040
“Tra
nsfo
rmed
Uga
ndan
Soc
iety
from
a P
easa
nt to
a M
oder
n an
d Pr
ospe
rous
Cou
ntry
with
in 3
0 ye
ars”
ND
P II
PSD
Obj
ectiv
e (s
)
PSD
S V
isio
n“A
com
petit
ive
and
deve
lopi
ng P
rivat
e Se
ctor
that
pro
mot
es in
clus
ive
grow
th fo
r sus
tain
able
eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent”
Mes
o-Pi
llar
"Acc
eler
ate
Indu
stri
alis
atio
n"
1. In
crea
se b
usin
ess t
o bu
sine
ss li
nkag
es.
2. U
pwar
d m
obili
ty a
long
indu
stria
l val
ue c
hain
.3.
Impr
ove
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
.
Mac
ro-P
illar
"Boo
st In
vest
or C
onfid
ence
"
1. Im
prov
e m
acro
econ
omic
env
ironm
ent.
2. E
nhan
ce le
gal a
nd re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
k.3.
Infr
astru
ctur
e ex
pans
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
.4.
Incr
ease
mar
ket e
ffici
enci
es.
5. E
ntre
pren
eurs
hip
and
skill
s dev
elop
men
38
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
APPENDICES
i) General Assumptions
Table 12: General Assumptions.Assumption Risk Mitigation1. Macro-economic
stabilityExternal shocks Internal fiscal mismanagement
Greater involvement by the Private Sector and the citizens of the country in the management of public affairs would provide assurances against macroeconomic instability risks.
2.Commitment of MDAs to NSPSD
Failure to mainstream sufficient resources and effective implementation of NSPSD
Mainstreaming and Prioritizing the NSPSD in MDA Planning and budgeting.
3. Holistic approach to implementation of the strategy
Ineffective coordination of relevant MDAs for implementation of the strategy.
Focusing on the big national objective than individual institutional mandates.
4. Effective Regional economic integration.
Ineffective elimination of Economic and trade barriers
Exploiting the domestic market and global opportunities.
ii) Assumptions by objectivesThe formulation of the objectives and their implementation for effective outcomes at the Macro-, Meso- and Micro-pillars was undertaken bearing in mind specific assumptions as outlined below.
Table 13: Pillar AssumptionsI MACRO: BOOSTING INVESTOR CONFIDENCE# Objective Assumption1 Improve Macroeconomic
Environment• Reasonable external shocks if any• Sound fiscal management
2 Enhance legal and regula-tory framework
• Limited delays in legislative process• Effective enforcement of laws and policies
3 Infrastructure expansion and maintenance
• Quality and timely execution of infrastructure delivery• Fast and transparent process in procurement• Private Sector engagement in infrastructure projects• Further reduction in power tariffs
4 Increase Market efficiency • Elimination of trade and non-tariff barriers• Increased competitiveness to benefit from regional trade
agreements• Increased private sector engagement in regional markets
5 Entrepreneurship and skills development
• More and better R&D for private sector development• Quality and relevant BTVET Institutions• Relevance of skills for labour market
39
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
II MESO: ACCELERATING INDUSTRIALISATIONObjective Assumption
1 Increase Business to Busi-ness Linkages
• Support from implementing agencies • Private Sector Uptake• Growth of business clusters• Implementation of MSME Policy and Strategy 2015
2 Increase upward mobility along the value chain
• Implementation of National Export Development Strategy• Increased value added Exports and improved current account• EPZs and Industrial Parks are operational• Internships and mentorship
3 Improve quality assurance • Adequate staffing and equipment of UNBS• Elimination of counterfeits• More Ugandan goods access regional and global markets
III MICRO: PROFITABILITY AND ENTERPRISE GROWTHObjective Assumption
1 Enhance factor productiv-ity
• Improved factor inputs-land , capital, labour• Implementation of R&D in agriculture
2 Formalization and profes-sionalism of SMEs
• Private Sector mind-set change• Increase in SMEs paying taxes.• Enforcement of Business registration• Incentives to SMEs
3 Increase access to finance • Affordable interest rates• New and expansion of alternative forms of credit (Microfinance
Institutions, Capital Markets)• Available long-term credit• Support by financial institutions
40
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Tabl
e 14
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix
MA
CR
O P
ILL
AR
:
BO
OST
ING
INV
EST
OR
CO
NFI
DE
NC
EO
bjec
tive
1. Im
prov
e M
acro
econ
omic
Env
iron
men
t
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et F
Y 2
1/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rsB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
Fin
ance
, Pl
anni
ng
and
Eco
nom
ic
Dev
elop
men
t
Econ
omic
M
anag
emen
t
Ann
ual
curr
ency
de
prec
iatio
n ra
te11
.40%
12.
10%
A
Bud
getin
g
Abs
orpt
ion
rate
96%
BN
/A
Deb
t to
GD
P ra
tio30
.2%
242
.50%
B
Shar
e of
bud
get fi
nanc
ed
dom
estic
ally
-3.3
%B
77.5
0%B
Gov
ernm
ent E
xpen
ditu
re
(% o
f GD
P)21
.5%
B21
.10%
B
Fisc
al
Man
agem
ent
Loan
dis
burs
emen
t rat
e39
%B
N/A
Mon
itorin
g lo
an
upta
ke a
nd
perf
orm
ance
Aver
age
annu
al lo
an
disb
urse
men
t rat
e39
%B
N/A
Aver
age
annu
al lo
an
abso
rptio
n ra
te
Tax
to G
DP
ratio
13%
B16
%B
Tax
polic
y m
anag
emen
t an
d re
view
Perc
enta
ge o
f unr
esol
ved
tax
com
plai
nts
to to
tal
case
s in
tax
appe
als t
ribun
al29
%B
21%
B
Fisc
al d
efici
t out
turn
s6.
7%B
4.70
%B
Bud
getin
gB
udge
t out
turn
s4.
50%
B4.
70%
B
Ban
k of
U
gand
a
Mon
etar
y Po
licy
Man
agem
ent
Ann
ual c
ore
infla
tion
targ
et o
f 5%
(+/-
2%)
4.6%
B5%
B
Infla
tion
targ
etin
gN
/AN
/A
1 Min
istry
of F
inan
ce, P
lann
ing
and
Econ
omic
Dev
elop
men
t, Pe
rfor
man
ce o
f the
Eco
nom
y Ju
ne 2
015
2 Min
istry
of F
inan
ce, P
lann
ing
and
Econ
omic
Dev
elop
men
t, Pe
rfor
man
ce o
f the
Eco
nom
y Ju
ne 2
016.
41
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2.
Enh
ance
lega
l and
reg
ulat
ory
fram
ewor
k
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Min
istr
y of
Ju
stic
e an
d C
onst
itutio
nal
Aff
airs
Adm
inis
tratio
n of
Just
ice
Rat
io o
f bro
ught
fo
rwar
d an
d di
spos
ed
case
s to
regi
ster
ed
35%
3N
/AA
djud
icat
ion
of c
ases
in
com
mer
cial
di
visi
on a
nd
indu
stria
l cou
rts
Num
ber o
f pen
ding
ca
ses i
n co
mm
erci
al
divi
sion
.
2,
861C
N/A
Dis
posa
l rat
e %
of
filed
cas
es82
.35%
C
Rat
io o
f com
plet
ed
case
s to
regi
ster
ed
case
s75
%C
125%
C
Uga
nda
Law
Ref
orm
C
omm
issi
onLe
gal r
efor
m
Ann
ual c
hang
e in
no
. of o
utda
ted
law
s in
the
inve
ntor
y (f
rom
orig
inal
44
com
mer
cial
law
s)
444
10%
paC
Rev
iew
and
pu
blic
atio
n of
co
mm
erci
al la
ws
Shar
e of
com
mer
cial
la
ws r
evie
wed
63%
c10
0%
Parl
iam
enta
ry
com
mis
sion
of
Uga
nda
Legi
slat
ion
% o
f Com
mer
cial
B
ills p
endi
ng in
Pa
rliam
ent
45%
C50
%C
Deb
ate
and
pass
bi
llsN
o. o
f Bill
s pas
sed
N
/A
D
omes
ticat
ion
of
harm
oniz
ed E
AC
Le
gisl
atio
ns
No.
of E
AC
Law
s do
mes
ticat
ed
N/A
N/A
3 Writ
ten
subm
issi
on to
MFP
ED Ju
ne, 2
016
4 Bus
ines
s lic
ensi
ng &
Reg
ulat
ion
refo
rm R
epor
t 201
2.
42
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2.
Enh
ance
lega
l and
reg
ulat
ory
fram
ewor
k
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Min
istr
y of
Fin
ance
, Pl
anni
ng a
nd
Eco
nom
ic
Dev
elop
men
t
Polic
y an
d St
rate
gy
% o
f Com
mer
cial
B
ills p
endi
ng
issu
ance
of
Cer
tifica
te
of F
inan
cial
Im
plic
atio
n
N/A
0%
Ass
essm
ent
and
Issu
ance
of
Fin
anci
al
Cer
tifica
tes
Tim
e ta
ken
to d
ispo
se
off t
he re
ques
tsN
/A
N/A
Ass
uran
ce
and
advi
sory
se
rvic
es
% o
f Int
erna
l Aud
it re
com
men
datio
ns
impl
emen
ted
63%
579
%D
Ass
uran
ce
and
Adv
isor
y Se
rvic
es
-No.
of a
udit
case
s w
ith sa
tisfa
ctor
y ra
ting.
1DN
/A
-No.
of a
udit
case
s with
nee
ds
impr
ovem
ent r
atin
g44
D
-No.
of a
udit
case
s w
ith u
nsat
isfa
ctor
y ra
ting
12D
Uga
nda
Inve
stm
ent
Aut
hori
ty
Faci
litat
ing
Inve
stm
ents
Li
cens
ing
No.
of I
nves
tors
lic
ense
d th
roug
h
One
-Sto
p C
entre
300C
400C
Proc
essi
ng
Inve
stor
’s
requ
ests
und
er
One
-Sto
p C
entre
Aver
age
time
take
n to
pr
oces
s req
uest
sN
/AN
/A
5 Min
istry
of F
inan
ce A
nnua
l Int
erna
l aud
it R
epor
t 201
5/16
43
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3.
Infr
astr
uctu
re E
xpan
sion
and
Mai
nten
ance
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Min
istr
y of
W
orks
and
Tr
ansp
ort
Wat
er
Tran
spor
t
Prop
ortio
n of
Car
go
Frei
ght c
onve
yed
by
wat
er2%
6N
/AM
anag
emen
t of
wat
er
vess
els a
nd
infr
astru
ctur
e
Car
go fr
eigh
t co
nvey
ed b
y w
ater
(MTS
)8,
100E
N/A
Av
erag
e Po
rt ca
paci
tyN
/AN
/A
Rai
l Tra
nspo
rt
Prop
ortio
n of
Met
re
Rai
lway
ope
ratio
n 56
%E
95%
E
Prop
ortio
n of
Car
go
Frei
ght c
onve
yed
by
Rai
l6%
E95
%E
Mai
nten
ance
an
d co
nstru
ctio
n of
Rai
l in
fras
truct
ure
No.
of k
m o
f rai
l co
nstru
cted
No
of K
m
mai
ntai
ned.
01,
736E
Roa
d Tr
ansp
ort
Prop
ortio
n of
Car
go
Frei
ght
conv
eyed
by
Roa
d95
%E
R
oad
cons
truct
ion
No.
of K
m o
f roa
d co
nstru
cted
12
9,46
9E
Air
Tran
spor
tPr
opor
tion
of
Com
mer
cial
Air
Cra
ft m
ovem
ents
87%
E95
%E
Mai
nten
ance
and
Ex
pans
ion
of
Airp
orts
Car
go fr
eigh
t co
nvey
ed b
y ai
r (m
etric
tonn
es)
UN
RA
Nat
iona
l R
oads
re
habi
litat
ion
&
Con
stru
ctio
n
Shar
e of
pav
ed
Nat
iona
l roa
ds in
fair
to g
ood
cond
ition
77%
E85
%E
Roa
d co
nstru
ctio
n
No.
of K
m o
f N
atio
nal R
oads
co
nstru
cted
per
A
nnum
250E
1000
E
Sh
are
of u
npav
ed
Nat
iona
l roa
ds in
fair
to g
ood
cond
ition
54%
E65
%E
Roa
d m
aint
enan
ce
No.
of K
m o
f roa
ds
mai
ntai
ned
Per
Ann
um11
,000
E2,
500E
6 Min
istry
of w
orks
and
Tra
nspo
rt, A
nnua
l Per
form
ance
repo
rt 20
15/1
6
44
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3.
Infr
astr
uctu
re E
xpan
sion
and
Mai
nten
ance
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
KC
CA
City
Roa
ds
reha
bilit
atio
n&
cons
truct
ion
Shar
e of
City
road
s in
fair
to g
ood
cond
ition
64%
EN
/AR
oad
cons
truct
ion
No.
of K
m o
f pav
ed
city
road
s con
stru
cted
Pe
r Ann
um57
5E1,
055E
Roa
d
mai
nten
ance
No.
of K
m o
f city
ro
ads
mai
ntai
ned
Per
Ann
um48
0E1,
200E
Expa
nsio
n of
Inte
grat
ed
Tran
spor
t Se
rvic
es in
th
e C
ity
Prop
ortio
n of
C
omm
uter
s usi
ng
mas
s Pub
lic tr
ansp
ort
(Bus
es, M
atat
us, M
ass
Tran
sits
, Bod
abod
a)
21%
M60
%M
Traf
fic
man
agem
ent
Aver
age
time
spen
t in
traffi
c ja
m h
rs./d
ay24
,000
7N
/A42
%M
3%M
37%
MN
/A
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ents
DU
CA
R R
oads
re
habi
litat
ion
& c
onst
ruct
ion
Shar
e of
DU
CA
R
road
s in
fair
to g
ood
cond
ition
60%
E80
%E
Roa
d co
nstru
ctio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce
No.
of K
m o
f D
UC
AR
road
s new
ly
cons
truct
ed
5,00
0E
15,0
00E
Prop
ortio
n of
LG
road
s to
Tot
al n
umbe
r of
road
s con
stru
cted
.
No.
of k
m o
f D
UC
AR
road
s m
aint
aine
d
50%
E75
%E
Agr
o-Pr
oces
sing
and
Va
lue A
dditi
on
Exte
nsio
n se
rvic
es to
bu
sine
sses
. 29
765
0Su
pply
, in
stal
latio
n an
d op
erat
iona
lizat
ion
of A
gro-
proc
essi
ng a
nd
valu
e ad
ditio
n fa
cilit
ies.
No.
of A
gro-
proc
essi
ng a
nd v
alue
ad
ditio
n fa
cilit
ies
oper
atio
naliz
ed.
297E
650E
7 KC
CA
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an 2
014/
15-2
018/
19
45
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3.
Infr
astr
uctu
re E
xpan
sion
and
Mai
nten
ance
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
NIT
A-U
Prov
isio
n of
IC
T N
atio
nal
back
bone
in
fras
truct
ure
Tele
den
sity
50%
8
9
0%F
Exte
nsio
n of
NB
I co
vera
geN
o: K
ms o
f NB
I ca
bles
laid
1,58
9F2,
299F
Acc
ess i
ndex
1.96
F3.
5F
Shar
e of
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ents
and
LLG
co
nnec
ted
to th
e N
BI
22%
F50
%F
Aver
age
annu
al
dow
ntim
e of
NB
I se
rvic
e(D
ays)
5F3.
65F
No.
of M
DA
s co
nnec
ted
to th
e N
BI
57%
F25
0FAv
erag
e In
tern
et
Spee
d of
NB
I ser
vice
(G
BPs
)2.
5FN
/A
MIN
IST
RY
O
F E
NE
RG
Y
Prov
isio
n of
en
ergy
nee
ds o
f th
e co
untry
.
Shar
e of
oil
prod
uctio
n0
N/A
N
o.km
of p
ipel
ine
cons
truct
ed.
Prop
ortio
n of
min
eral
s to
exp
orts
0N
/A
Oil
Refi
nery
co
nstru
ctio
n
0N
/A
Stor
age
capa
city
fo
r oil
natio
nal o
il re
serv
es
M
iner
al d
evel
opm
ent
8 ICT
Sect
or st
rate
gy &
Inve
stm
ent p
lan
2015
-202
0
46
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3.
Infr
astr
uctu
re E
xpan
sion
and
Mai
nten
ance
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Uga
nda
Ele
ctri
city
G
ener
atio
n C
ompa
ny
Lim
ited
(UE
GC
L)
Elec
trici
ty
gene
ratio
n
Elec
trici
ty g
ener
atio
n ca
paci
ty (i
n M
W/H
R)
380G
1,
163G
Mai
nten
ance
an
d ex
pans
ion
of e
lect
ricity
ge
nera
tion
(Kar
uma
600M
/H
R, I
sim
ba
183M
/hr.
and
380m
/hr.
Esko
m).
Aver
age
Con
stru
ctio
n pr
ogre
ss ra
te fo
r pu
blic
dam
s
57%
GN
/A
94%
GN
/A
Dev
elop
men
t an
d op
erat
ion
of e
lect
ricity
ge
nera
tion
faci
litie
s
1,16
3G
Con
cess
ion
mon
itorin
g of
com
plex
(E
SKO
M;
2021
/22)
N/A
Varia
nce
betw
een
inst
alle
d an
d ge
nera
tion
capa
city
67%
G94
% -
97%
G
Ele
ctri
city
R
egul
ator
y A
utho
rity
Elec
trici
ty
Indu
stry
R
egul
atio
n
Aver
age
disp
osal
ra
te o
f lic
ense
ap
plic
atio
ns(d
ays)
180G
N/A
Lice
nse
issu
ance
Proj
ects
with
m
inim
um g
ener
atio
n ca
paci
ty o
f 49.
7 M
W
8GN
/A
Rat
io o
f res
olve
d co
mpl
aint
s: T
otal
co
mpl
aint
s70
%G
N/A
Indu
stry
Su
rvei
llanc
e an
d R
egul
atio
n En
forc
emen
t
No.
of c
ompl
aint
s31
4GN
/A
Uga
nda
Ele
ctri
city
Tr
ansm
issi
on
Com
pany
L
imite
d (U
ET
CL
)
Elec
trici
ty
trans
mis
sion
Ann
ual g
row
th in
de
nsity
of h
igh
volta
ge
elec
trici
ty g
rid b
y m
odel
2015
G20
20G
Con
stru
ctio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce
of h
igh
pow
er
volta
ge li
nes
Ener
gy p
erce
ntag
e lo
ss in
tran
smis
sion
3.60
% G
2.70
%G
47
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3.
Infr
astr
uctu
re E
xpan
sion
and
Mai
nten
ance
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2U
gand
a E
lect
rici
ty
Dis
trib
utio
n C
ompa
ny
Lim
ited
(UE
DC
L)
Elec
trici
ty
dist
ribut
ion
Geo
grap
hica
l co
vera
ge o
f ele
ctric
ity
dist
ribut
ion
netw
ork
40%
G80
%G
Supe
rvis
ion
and
expa
nsio
n of
ele
ctric
ity
dist
ribut
ion
Ener
gy lo
ss in
di
strib
utio
n18
.8%
G14
%G
No
of K
WTs
di
strib
uted
(to
the
busi
ness
com
mun
ity)
7,47
0,51
8G11
,952
,828
G
Ann
ual i
ncre
ase
in th
e nu
mbe
r of c
onne
ctio
ns
to th
e el
ectri
city
grid
11,7
94,3
5GN
/A
12
.80%
G11
.00%
G
Shar
e of
pop
ulat
ion
conn
ecte
d to
the
elec
trici
ty g
rid
14.8
%G
15%
G
Tech
nica
l and
co
mm
erci
al lo
sses
No.
of C
usto
mer
s on
the
Grid
9,52
6G
10
0,00
0G14
0,00
0G
48
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 4
: Inc
reas
e g
oods
Mar
ket e
ffici
enci
es in
Uga
nda
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22
Min
istr
y of
Tra
de,
Indu
stry
and
C
oope
rativ
es
Trad
e D
evel
opm
ent
Nat
iona
l C
omm
odity
Ex
chan
ge M
arke
t op
erat
iona
lized
01
Con
stru
ctio
n of
bo
arde
r mar
kets
for
regi
onal
exp
orts
Num
ber o
f bo
arde
r mar
kets
co
nstru
cted
and
op
erat
iona
l
1
20H
Num
ber
of
Infr
astru
ctur
e de
velo
ped
120
10
Ran
king
of G
oods
M
arke
t Effi
cien
cy
(GC
I ran
k )
12011
No.
of t
rade
rs
acce
ssin
g na
tiona
l tra
de in
form
atio
n sy
stem
0N
/A
Dev
elop
men
t and
in
stal
latio
n of
ICT
infr
astru
ctur
e fo
r One
St
op B
oard
er p
osts
No.
of o
ne st
op
boar
der p
osts
es
tabl
ishe
d w
ith
ICT
4
20H
Fiel
d vi
sits
and
as
sess
men
t
No.
of N
TBs
iden
tified
and
el
imin
ated
1,
500H
3,
000H
Upd
ate
and
Mai
nten
ance
of N
TB
repo
rting
syst
em
Num
ber o
f use
rs o
f th
e Sy
stem
5,
000H
10
0,00
0H
Esta
blis
hmen
t of T
rade
In
form
atio
n de
sks
Num
ber o
f tra
de
info
rmat
ion
desk
s es
tabl
ishe
d.
5H
N/A
10M
inis
try o
f Tra
de, I
ndus
try a
nd C
oope
rativ
es, S
ecto
r Dev
elop
men
t pla
n 20
15/1
6-20
119/
2011
Wor
ld E
cono
mic
For
um G
loba
l Com
petit
iven
ess R
epor
t201
5/16
49
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 4
: Inc
reas
e g
oods
Mar
ket e
ffici
enci
es in
Uga
nda
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22
Min
istr
y of
Gen
der,
Lab
our
and
Soci
al
Dev
elop
men
t
Labo
ur
Mar
ket
Info
rmat
ion
Occ
upat
ion
Safe
ty
and
Hea
lth
N/A
N/A
Mon
itorin
g of
O
ccup
atio
nal H
ealth
&
Sta
ndar
ds a
t Wor
k Pl
aces
No:
of s
tatu
tory
in
spec
tions
co
nduc
ted.
63
0 12
63
0C
N/A
N/A
No.
of n
on-
stat
utor
y in
spec
tions
co
nduc
ted.
64
6C
800C
Labo
ur M
arke
t ef
ficie
ncy
(GC
I)27
13N
/A
Dat
a C
olle
ctio
n an
d an
alys
is o
f Lab
our
Stat
istic
s
Upd
ated
op
erat
iona
l D
atab
ase
1 1
No.
of b
ilate
ral
agre
emen
t to
expo
rt la
bour
- 7
No.
of e
mpl
oym
ent
bure
aus l
icen
sed
30
C
100C
Arb
itrat
ion
of la
bour
di
sput
es
Num
ber o
f cas
es
hand
led
in th
e In
dust
rial C
ourt
N/A
N
/A
Res
olvi
ng c
ases
of
labo
ur c
ompl
aint
s and
di
sput
es
Perc
enta
ge o
f re
gist
ered
cas
es
hand
led
in
MoG
LSD
90%
C95
%C
Cas
e ba
cklo
g in
in
dust
rial C
ourt.
Perc
enta
ge o
f re
gist
ered
cas
es
reso
lved
in th
e In
dust
rial C
ourt
5%C
40%
C
Mon
itorin
g fo
r lab
our
stan
dard
s (co
nditi
ons
& se
rvic
es o
f wor
kers
.
No.
of
insp
ectio
ns
cond
ucte
d
197C
30
0C
12M
inis
try o
f Gen
der,
Labo
ur a
nd so
cial
Dev
elop
men
t, W
ritte
n su
bmis
sion
to M
FPED
Nov
embe
r 201
6.13
Wor
ld E
cono
mic
For
um, G
loba
l Com
petit
iven
ess R
epor
t,201
5/16
50
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 4
: Inc
reas
e g
oods
Mar
ket e
ffici
enci
es in
Uga
nda
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tors
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22
Uga
nda
War
ehou
se
Rec
eipt
A
utho
rity
Com
mod
ity
War
ehou
se
Rec
eipt
Sy
stem
(W
HR
S)
Nat
iona
l W
areh
ousi
ng
stor
age
capa
city
(M
etric
Ton
s)
165,
40014
550,
000C
Mon
itorin
g &
In
spec
tion
of
war
ehou
se st
ores
No.
of w
areh
ouse
s re
gist
ered
N
/A
26C
146,
500C
Sh
are
of li
cens
ed
war
ehou
ses
N/A
N/A
No.
of p
artic
ipan
ts
sens
itize
d
800C
3,
200C
N
o. o
f War
ehou
ses
Insp
ecte
d
26C
N/A
N
o. o
f Ban
ks
disc
ount
ing
rece
ipts
N
/A
N/A
N
o. o
f Per
sonn
el/
Han
dler
s tra
ined
130C
N/A
Num
ber o
f tra
ders
/ Dep
osito
rs
regi
ster
ed u
nder
th
e W
areh
ouse
re
ceip
ting
syst
em
80
0C
4,00
0C
No.
of w
areh
ouse
re
ceip
ts is
sued
N
/AN
/A
CM
A
Cap
ita M
arke
t re
gula
tion
No.
of I
nstit
utio
ns
unde
r reg
ulat
ion
2815
N/A
Reg
ulat
ion,
Su
perv
isio
n an
d Li
stin
g
No.
of l
icen
ses
issu
ed a
nd re
new
ed
114C
N/A
No.
of n
ew
prov
ider
s lic
ense
d
4C N
/A
Cap
ital
Mar
ket
Dev
elop
men
t
Perc
enta
ge c
hang
e in
equ
ity tu
rnov
er
USE
7%C
NA
Con
duct
ing
rese
arch
for m
arke
t de
velo
pmen
t
Fund
s und
er
man
agem
ent
licen
sed
by
CM
A(T
rillio
ns)
1,2
4C N
/A
Shar
e Vo
lum
e of
Tr
ade
thro
ugh
USE
(M
illio
n U
gx)
1.84
8,05
C
N/A
N
/A
14W
areh
ouse
Rec
eipt
syst
em, w
ritte
n su
bmis
sion
to M
FPED
201
615
Cap
ital m
arke
ts A
utho
rity
writ
ten
subm
issi
on to
MFP
ED 2
016
51
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 5
: Ent
repr
eneu
rshi
p an
d Sk
ills D
evel
opm
ent
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rsB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
UIR
I
Indu
stria
l Res
earc
h &
Dev
elop
men
t
Valu
e Add
ed
Prod
ucts
dev
elop
ed
Esta
blis
hmen
t and
m
aint
enan
ce o
f bus
ines
s an
d te
chno
logy
incu
batio
n in
fras
truct
ure
No
of n
ew
incu
batio
ns
20.0
0C
200.
00C
Num
ber o
f new
Sa
mpl
es d
evel
oped
Supe
rvis
ion
and
mon
itorin
g of
Pro
duct
D
evel
opm
ent.
Indu
stria
l Res
earc
h R
epor
ts
40C
250C
Supe
rvis
ion
and
Adv
isor
y Se
rvic
es
Prod
uct r
ange
m
atur
ing
from
In
cuba
tion
800C
33,8
00C
Con
duct
ing
Surv
eys a
nd
Ana
lysi
s
No
of In
cuba
tion
Prod
ucts
de
velo
ped
22
.00C
N/A
B
usin
ess a
nd
Tech
nolo
gica
l In
cuba
tion
10C
100C
20C
200C
Mod
el V
alue
A
dditi
on
Esta
blis
hmen
ts
10C
130C
4C39
C
MoE
SSk
ills T
rain
ing
and
Cer
tifica
tion
Ann
ual B
TVET
En
rolm
ent
42,0
0016
103,
000I
Con
stru
ctio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f Voc
atio
nal
Trai
ning
cen
ters
No
of o
pera
tiona
l tra
inin
g si
te c
entre
s1,
000I
N/A
Ann
ual B
TVET
Pa
ss ra
te31
%I
90%
ITr
aini
ngN
o of
stud
ents
tra
ined
42
,000
I
103,
000I
16U
gand
a B
ITV
ET st
rate
gy 2
012/
13-2
020/
22
52
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
Obj
ectiv
e 5
: Ent
repr
eneu
rshi
p an
d Sk
ills D
evel
opm
ent
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rsB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
Gen
der,
Lab
our
and
Soci
al
Dev
elop
men
t
Gra
nt &
Loa
n fin
ance
Ann
ual g
rant
s di
sbur
sed
thro
ugh
Yout
h Li
velih
ood
Prog
ram
me
(Ush
s)
35bn
C
85bn
C
Sens
itiza
tion
Mob
iliza
tion
and
bene
ficia
ry a
sses
smen
t
No
of Y
outh
be
nefic
iarie
s
50,7
43C
90
,000
C.
Ann
ual g
rant
s di
sbur
sed
thro
ugh
W
omen
ent
erpr
ises
(U
WEP
)(U
shs)
3bnC
40bn
C
No.
of
envi
ronm
enta
lly
frie
ndly
ent
erpr
ises
un
der y
outh
3,
872C
7,
000C
No.
of b
enefi
ciar
ies
unde
r wom
en
Entre
pren
eurs
hip
prog
ram
me.
-
26,0
00C
Ann
ual n
umbe
r of
certi
fied
appr
entic
es
No.
of
envi
ronm
enta
lly
frie
ndly
ent
erpr
ises
un
der U
WEP
-
2,60
0C
Skill
s tra
inin
g
Non
-for
mal
Vo
catio
nal a
nd li
fe
Skill
trai
ning
.
App
rent
ices
hip/
Trai
ning
N
o of
app
rent
ices
gr
adua
tes
-
1,50
0.00
I
Sens
itiza
tion
mob
iliza
tion
bene
ficia
ry se
lect
ion
and
skill
s tra
inin
g
No.
of Y
outh
eq
uipp
ed w
ith n
on-
form
al v
ocat
iona
l an
d lif
e sk
ills.
1,11
1.00
I
2,01
1.00
I
Perc
enta
ge o
f tra
ined
you
th
equi
pped
with
tool
ki
ts in
rele
vant
ar
eas.
50%
IN
/A
53
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
ME
SO P
ILL
AR
: A
CC
EL
ER
ATIN
G IN
DU
STR
IAL
IZAT
ION
Obj
ectiv
e 1:
I
ncre
ase
Bus
ines
s to
Bus
ines
s Lin
kage
s
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
Tr
ade,
Indu
stry
an
d C
oope
rativ
es
Trad
e an
d In
dust
ry
info
rmat
ion
Tr
ade
prom
otio
nN
o. o
f tra
de fa
irs
orga
nize
d1H
10H
Shar
e of
mic
ro e
nter
pris
es in
bu
sine
ss re
gist
er.
94%
17 N
/A
Shar
e of
mic
ro e
nter
pris
es
linke
d fo
r bus
ines
s tra
nsac
tions
N/A
N
/A
Bui
ldin
g da
taba
se o
f SM
Es.
Prop
ortio
n of
MSM
Es p
er
subs
ecto
r ope
ratio
nal a
nd
upda
ted
data
base
N/A
N/A
Dat
a co
llect
ion
and
anal
ysis
No
of M
SMEs
per
su
bsec
tor
N/A
N/A
Uga
nda
Inve
stm
ent
Aut
hori
ty
SME
deve
lopm
ent
Prop
ortio
n of
SM
Es li
nked
to
Tra
nsna
tiona
l Cor
pora
tion
(TN
C)-
SME)
.
8C16
C
No
of n
etw
orki
ng
even
ts a
nd p
latfo
rms
8C16
C
Prop
ortio
n of
SM
Es tr
aine
d in
bus
ines
s ski
lls a
nd
Entre
pren
eurs
hip.
384C
480C
Bus
ines
s par
ticip
atio
n ra
te70
%C
90%
CC
lust
er
form
atio
nN
o. o
f SM
E cl
uste
r es
tabl
ishe
d8C
16C
No.
of j
oint
ven
ture
s60
C16
C
17M
inis
try o
f Tra
de, I
ndus
try a
nd c
oope
rativ
es, S
ecto
r Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n201
5/16
-201
9/20
54
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2:
Upw
ard
Mob
ility
alo
ng In
dust
rial
Val
ue C
hain
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Uga
nda
Exp
ort
Prom
otio
n B
oard
Expo
rt tra
de a
nd
mar
ket i
nfor
mat
ion-
In
form
atio
n on
exp
orts
C
ampa
igns
(IEC
)
Upd
ated
and
op
erat
iona
l da
taba
se
012
18St
akeh
olde
r en
gage
men
tN
o of
stud
ies
publ
ishe
d ab
out m
arke
t op
portu
nitie
s
21910
K
A
nnua
l exp
orts
st
atis
tical
ab
stra
cts
1K1K
N
o of
trai
ning
s co
nduc
ted
in v
alue
ad
ditio
n an
d bu
sine
ss
mar
kets
.
10K
250K
U
gand
a’s s
hare
in
CO
MES
A e
xpor
ts3%
K5%
K
No.
of p
artic
ipan
ts
train
ed in
val
ue a
dditi
on
and
busi
ness
mar
ketin
g
30K
50K
U
gand
a’s s
hare
in
EAC
exp
orts
per
an
num
22%
K30
%K
N
o of
ben
efici
arie
s fr
om tr
aini
ngs
N/A
N/A
Expo
rt m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n
Upd
ate
freq
uenc
y of
ex
port
stat
istic
s/an
num
1K4JK
N
o. o
f IEC
cam
paig
ns
6K30
K
N
o. o
f cer
tifica
tes o
f or
igin
issu
ed (f
or a
ll se
ven
pref
eren
tial t
rade
re
gim
es)
18,0
00C
30,0
00C
18U
gand
a ex
port
prom
otio
n pa
per a
t 7th
ann
ual s
ecto
r rev
iew
con
fere
nce2
016/
17
19M
inis
try o
f Tra
de, i
ndus
try a
nd C
oope
rativ
es, S
ecto
r Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n 20
15/1
6-20
19/2
0
55
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2:
Upw
ard
Mob
ility
alo
ng In
dust
rial
Val
ue C
hain
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Uga
nda
Inve
stm
ent
Aut
hori
ty
Inve
stm
ent P
rom
otio
n an
d fa
cilit
atio
nPr
opor
tion
of
Bus
ines
ses
licen
sed
thro
ugh
UIA
Acq
uisi
tion
of la
nd fo
r in
dust
rial
deve
lopm
ent
No.
of i
ndus
trial
par
ks
who
se la
nd is
secu
red
4C9C
Shar
e of
serv
iced
pl
ots
44%
C10
0%C
Indu
stria
l an
d B
usin
ess
park
in
fras
truct
ure
deve
lopm
ent
and
mai
nten
ance
No.
of
com
pany
in
oper
atio
nal i
ndus
trial
pa
rks
67C
355C
Tim
e(M
onth
s) ta
ken
to a
cqui
re la
nd in
in
dust
rial p
arks
3C1C
Valu
e of
in
vest
men
t in
flow
s
N/A
N
umbe
r of j
obs c
reat
ed0.
8m
Shar
e of
op
erat
iona
l se
rvic
e pl
ots
10%
C85
%C
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
of in
dust
ry
activ
ity
Ope
ratio
nal c
apac
ity
of fu
nctio
nal i
ndus
trial
an
d bu
sine
ss p
arks
355C
355c
56
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2:
Upw
ard
Mob
ility
alo
ng In
dust
rial
Val
ue C
hain
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Uga
nda
Free
Z
ones
Aut
hori
ty
Expo
rt in
vest
or su
ppor
t an
d in
fras
truct
ure
deve
lopm
ent
Num
ber o
f en
terp
rises
op
erat
ing
in fr
ee
zone
s
010
020Pr
omot
ing
Inve
stm
ent i
n Fr
ee Z
ones
Act
ual I
nves
tmen
ts in
Fr
ee Z
ones
0 $
1.5
bnL
No.
of o
pera
tiona
l EP
Zs0
10L
Lice
nsin
gN
o. o
f ope
rato
rs a
nd
deve
lope
rs li
cens
ed0
10L
No.
of j
obs c
reat
ed0
2,50
0LM
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
nN
o. o
f job
s cre
ated
02,
500L
Valu
e of
ent
erpr
ises
op
erat
ing
in th
e fr
ee
zone
s
0$
1bL
Expo
rt or
ient
ed
inve
stm
ent
Valu
e of
exp
orts
in th
e Fr
ee Z
ones
0$1
bL
Min
istr
y of
Tra
de,
Indu
stry
and
C
oope
rativ
es
Prov
isio
n of
Mar
ket
Plat
form
s N
o. o
f ope
ratio
nal
boar
der
mar
ket
3H16
1HR
egul
atio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of p
latfo
rm
activ
ities
No.
of p
rogr
ess r
epor
ts
(M&
E)40
H
Uga
nda
Dev
elop
men
t C
orpo
ratio
n
Proj
ect d
evel
opm
ent
Feas
ibili
ty st
udie
s co
nduc
ted
5 21
15C
Und
erta
ke S
trate
gic
Publ
ic In
vest
men
tsPr
opor
tion
of
stra
tegi
c In
vest
men
ts
unde
rtake
n b
y U
DC
4C15
CPr
ojec
t D
evel
opm
ent
Num
ber o
f Fea
sibi
lity
stud
ies u
nder
take
n
Jo
int v
entu
res a
nd
or P
PPs f
orm
ed.
Num
ber o
f Inv
estm
ent
nego
tiatio
ns.
MT
WA
Expo
rt tra
de a
nd m
arke
t in
form
atio
n
Exhi
bitio
n N
o. o
f exp
os4J
10J
Prop
ortio
n of
to
uris
ts a
rriv
als
To
uris
ts re
ache
d in
targ
et
mar
kets
10
,000
J20
m22
20U
gand
a Fr
ee Z
ones
Aut
horit
y, st
rate
gic
Plan
201
5/16
-201
9/20
21
Uga
nda
Dev
elop
men
t Cor
pora
tion,
Writ
ten
subm
issi
on to
MFP
ED, J
une
2016
22
The
com
petit
iven
ess a
nd E
nter
pris
e D
evel
opm
ent P
roje
ct 2
015-
2019
57
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3:
Impr
ove
Qua
lity
Ass
uran
ce
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
Uga
nda
Nat
iona
l B
urea
u of
St
anda
rds
Stan
dard
s de
velo
pmen
tPr
oduc
t cov
erag
e by
st
anda
rd re
gist
ry12
02325
0ND
omes
ticat
ion
of E
AC
an
d C
OM
ESA
and
in
tern
atio
nal
stan
dard
s
No.
of s
tand
ards
de
velo
ped
120N
250N
Stan
dard
s Res
earc
hN
o. o
f new
stan
dard
s for
lo
cal p
rodu
cts
120N
250N
Stan
dard
s en
forc
emen
tN
o. o
f sub
stan
dard
pr
oduc
ts i
dent
ified
7,50
0N4,
000N
Qua
lity
audi
ts
(Sta
ndar
ds v
erifi
catio
n)N
o. o
f qua
lity
insp
ectio
ns20
0N80
0N
No.
of i
mpo
rted
good
s con
sign
men
t in
spec
ted
50,0
00N
90,0
00N
Elim
inat
ion
of
Cou
nter
feit
prod
ucts
No.
of s
taff
in b
orde
r po
sts
30N
150N
Prod
uct
certi
ficat
ion
No
of c
ertifi
ed
dom
estic
pro
duct
s50
0N90
0NPr
oces
sing
app
licat
ions
fo
r cer
tifica
tion
App
licat
ions
dis
pose
d10
0N10
00N
Prod
uct
Sam
ples
Te
sted
No
of la
bora
torie
s set
up
No.
of S
ampl
es T
este
d7,
200N
12, 0
00N
Mea
sure
men
t sy
stem
s aud
itC
onfo
rmity
rate
s
In
spec
tion
No.
of i
nstru
men
ts
test
ed1,
200N
3,00
0N
Mar
ket a
nd fa
ctor
y su
rvei
llanc
e
Equi
pmen
t Ve
rified
No
of in
spec
tions
1000
N18
,000
N
Ope
ratio
nal l
ab
equi
pmen
t54
0,00
0N65
6,37
3N
23U
gand
a N
atio
nal B
urea
u of
Sta
ndar
ds, W
ritte
n su
bmis
sion
to M
FPED
June
201
6
58
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3:
Impr
ove
Qua
lity
Ass
uran
ce
MD
APu
blic
Se
rvic
e R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
FY 2
1/22
Rou
tine A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2
UT
B
Stan
dard
s En
forc
emen
t of
hot
els
Prop
ortio
n of
hot
els
that
mee
t the
requ
ired
stan
dard
s.
N/A
N/A
Mon
itorin
g R
egio
ns M
onito
red
1O5O
Hot
el a
nd re
stau
rant
gr
adin
gN
o of
hot
els a
nd
rest
aura
nts g
rade
d/cl
assi
fied
42O
20
0O
Sens
itiza
tion
Hot
els s
ensi
tized
for
clas
sific
atio
n20
024
2,00
0O
N
umbe
r of h
otel
s in
spec
ted.
320O
20
,000
O
MIC
RO
PIL
LA
R: I
NC
RE
ASI
NG
PR
OFI
TAB
ILIT
Y A
ND
GR
OW
TH
OF
EN
TE
RPR
ISE
SO
bjec
tive
1:
E
nhan
ce F
acto
r Pr
oduc
tivity
MD
APu
blic
Ser
vice
R
ole
Serv
ice
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY 1
4/15
Targ
et
21/2
2R
outin
e A
ctiv
ityR
outin
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/1
5Ta
rget
FY
21/2
2M
inis
try
of
Edu
catio
n Sk
ills
deve
lopm
ent
Perc
enta
ge o
f Ter
tiary
en
rollm
ent b
y B
TVET
7
0,00
0I 1
20,0
00I
Esta
blis
hing
tra
inin
g in
fras
truct
ure
No.
of
form
al tr
aini
ng
cent
res
esta
blis
hed
144I
289I
com
plet
ion
rate
in
BTV
ET N
/A
N/A
C
ondu
ctin
g tra
inin
gsN
o. o
f enr
olle
d st
uden
ts g
radu
atin
gN
/AN
/A
No.
of
info
rmal
tra
inin
g ce
ntre
s es
tabl
ishe
d
300I
300I
No.
of
Publ
ic C
entre
s of
exc
elle
nce
040
I
24M
inis
try o
f Tou
rism
, Wild
life
and
Ant
iqua
tes A
nnua
l Bud
get P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t 201
4/15
59
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 1:
Enh
ance
Fac
tor
Prod
uctiv
ityM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
21
/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
Lan
ds,
Hou
sing
an
d U
rban
D
evel
opm
ent
Land
A
dmin
istra
tion
and
man
agem
ent
Shar
e of
title
d la
nd
20%
2532
%P
Land
regi
stra
tion
Ann
ual g
row
th in
the
shar
e of
title
d la
nd40
%P
100%
P
C
ompu
teriz
atio
n of
land
regi
stry
No.
of
com
pute
rized
la
nd re
gist
ries
6P21
P
Land
In
form
atio
nAv
erag
e tit
le se
arch
tim
e(da
ys)
23P
14P
Title
sear
chN
o. o
f titl
e se
arch
es
cond
ucte
d50
0,00
0P1m
P
Pe
rcen
t of c
ount
ry
map
ped
30%
P10
0%P
25M
inis
try o
f Lan
ds, H
ousi
ng &
Urb
an D
evel
opm
ent,
Ann
ual B
udge
t Per
form
ance
Rep
ort
60
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 1:
Enh
ance
Fac
tor
Prod
uctiv
ityM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
21
/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
A
gric
ultu
re
Ani
mal
In
dust
ry &
Fi
sher
ies
Inpu
t sup
ply
Rat
io o
f ext
ensi
on
wor
kers
: far
mer
s1
to
5000
26
1 to
500
0R
Rec
ruitm
ent
and
capa
city
bu
ildin
g of
ex
tens
ion
wor
kers
No.
of e
xten
sion
w
orke
rs re
crui
ted
Con
stru
ctio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce
of a
gric
ultu
ral
scho
ols
Num
ber o
f agr
icul
tura
l sc
hool
s con
stru
cted
an
d m
aint
aine
d.
2R2R
Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f de
mon
stra
tion
site
s
No.
of d
emon
stra
tion
site
s ope
ratio
nal
Perc
enta
ge o
f far
mer
s ac
cess
ing
qual
ity in
puts
40
%R
80%
R
Proc
urem
ent a
nd
dist
ribut
ion
of
inpu
t sup
plie
s
Inpu
t vol
umes
di
strib
uted
by
type
(c
rops
, agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck)
N/A
N/A
Rat
io o
f reg
iste
red
and
certi
fied
inpu
t sup
plie
rs
to fa
rmin
g ho
useh
olds
.
Seed
s 1 to
50
0,00
0R
Seed
lings
1
to
20,0
00
1:10
000R
Reg
istra
tion
and
certi
ficat
ion
of
inpu
t dea
lers
.N
o. o
f sup
plie
rs
certi
fied
Shar
e of
cer
tified
inpu
ts
to d
eman
d(cr
ops,
aqua
cultu
re, l
ives
tock
) 40
%R,
20%
,50%
Su
ppor
t priv
ate
sect
or to
in
crea
se se
ed
prod
uctio
n.
Shar
e of
farm
ers u
sing
irr
igat
ion.
1%
R5%
R
Ope
ratio
n &
mai
nten
ance
of
irr
igat
ion
sche
mes
No.
of i
rrig
atio
n sc
hem
es e
stab
lishe
d an
d op
erat
iona
l
1%S
5%S
26U
gand
a N
atio
nal a
gric
ultu
ral E
xten
sion
Stra
tegy
201
6/17
-202
2/21
61
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 1:
Enh
ance
Fac
tor
Prod
uctiv
ityM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
21
/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
A
gric
ultu
re
Ani
mal
In
dust
ry &
Fi
sher
ies
Wat
er fo
r pr
oduc
tion
% o
f far
mer
s with
ac
cess
to a
gric
ultu
ral
mec
hani
zatio
n.
10%
R20
%R
Pro
mot
e ac
quis
ition
and
ut
iliza
tion
of
agric
ultu
ral
mec
hani
zatio
n te
chno
logi
es
% o
f far
mer
s with
ac
cess
to tr
acto
rs.
10%
R20
%R
% o
f ara
ble
land
und
er
irrig
atio
n1%
275%
Con
tract
ion
of
field
irrig
atio
n sc
hem
eA
crea
ge o
f new
ara
ble
land
und
er ir
rigat
ion
1%S
5%S
Farm
er
regi
stra
tion
and
Dem
and
asse
ssm
ent
No.
of f
arm
ers
regi
ster
ed a
nd d
eman
d as
sess
ed
Wat
er re
sour
ces
asse
ssm
ent
No.
Wat
er re
sour
ces
asse
ssm
ent r
epor
ts
Feas
ibili
ty
Stud
ies
No.
Fea
sibi
lity
stud
y re
ports
Engi
neer
ing
Des
igns
No.
Eng
inee
ring
desi
gn re
ports
Con
stru
ctio
n of
w
ater
rese
rvoi
rsN
o. o
f new
rese
rvoi
rs
cons
truct
ed
Reh
abili
tatio
n of
W
ater
rese
rvoi
rsN
o of
rese
rvoi
rs
reha
bilit
ated
Com
mun
ity
Bas
ed O
pera
tion
and
Mai
nten
ance
(C
BO
M)
activ
ities
in
clud
ing
train
ing
No.
of W
ater
Use
rs'
Ass
ocia
tions
(WU
As)
fo
rmed
and
trai
ned
CB
OM
syst
em in
pl
ace
27M
inis
try o
f Wat
er a
nd E
nviro
nmen
t, Ir
rigat
ion
Mas
ter p
lan
2035
62
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 1:
Enh
ance
Fac
tor
Prod
uctiv
ityM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
21
/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY21
/22
Min
istr
y of
A
gric
ultu
re
Ani
mal
In
dust
ry &
Fi
sher
ies
Wat
er fo
r pr
oduc
tion
Wat
er st
orag
e ca
paci
ty
(Cub
ic M
eter
s)11
.5S
20S
Con
stru
ctio
n of
w
ater
rese
rvoi
rs
No.
of n
ew v
alle
y ta
nks a
nd d
ams
cons
truct
ed in
cat
tle
corr
idor
(cub
ic
mill
imet
ers)
11.5
S20
S
NA
RO
Res
earc
h &
D
evel
opm
ent
in h
igh
yiel
ding
va
rietie
s
Varie
ties d
evel
oped
126
105S
Con
duct
ing
rese
arch
into
ne
w v
arie
ties
No
of n
ew v
arie
ties
rele
ased
126S
105S
New
Tec
hnol
ogy,
in
nova
tions
&
man
agem
ent p
ract
ices
12
0SSt
reng
then
ing
rese
arch
in
stitu
tes.
Trai
ned
at M
Sc a
nd
PhD
Lev
el.
30
sTr
aini
ng o
f re
sear
cher
sN
umbe
r of r
esea
rche
rs
train
ed
12
s
6%S
50%
S
NA
GR
C&
DB
Bre
edin
g of
liv
esto
ck &
Po
ultry
Bre
eds d
evel
oped
and
di
strib
uted
Res
earc
h an
d D
evel
opm
ent
N/A
N/A
63
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 2:
Form
aliz
atio
n an
d St
reng
then
ing
Cap
acity
of S
ME
sM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
21
/22
Rou
tine
Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY20
/21
Ent
erpr
ise
Uga
nda
Bus
ines
s D
evel
opm
ent
Serv
ices
Ann
ual c
hang
e in
clie
nt
regi
stry
Surv
ival
rate
of B
DS
grad
uate
30%
C65
%C
Trai
ning
pr
ogra
ms
No
of c
lient
regi
ster
ed
34,8
57C
N/A
No
of p
artic
ipan
ts
train
ed in
Bus
ines
s an
d En
trepr
eneu
rshi
p
Trai
ning
, and
lin
kage
sN
o. o
f bus
ines
ses
acce
ssin
g B
DS
from
en
terp
rise
Uga
nda
9,00
011
,000
C
UR
SBB
usin
ess
regi
stra
tion
Ann
ual c
hang
e in
the
Bus
ines
s reg
iste
r.53
%C
70%
CR
egis
tratio
n of
co
mpa
nies
Aver
age
time
take
n to
re
gist
er a
Com
pany
(h
rs.)
6C1C
Reg
istra
tion
of
busi
ness
nam
es
and
pate
nts
No.
of c
ompa
nies
re
gist
ered
18,3
36C
N/A
No.
of b
usin
ess n
ames
re
gist
ered
11,4
82C
N/A
Aver
age
time
take
n to
Reg
iste
r bus
ines
s na
me
and
othe
r do
cum
ents
< 4h
rC<
1 ho
urC
Expa
nsio
n of
R
egis
tratio
n C
entre
s
Num
ber o
f R
egis
tratio
n C
entre
s 5C
37C
UR
ATa
x ad
min
istra
tion
aver
age
time
take
n to
re
ceiv
e a
TIN
(hrs
)48
C4C
Tax
regi
stra
tion
Num
ber o
f cam
paig
ns
carr
ied
out
122C
180C
Ann
ual g
row
th
in ta
x re
gist
er23
%C
25%
Tax
Educ
atio
nN
umbe
r of n
ew ta
x pa
yers
regi
ster
edM
inis
try
of L
ocal
G
over
nmen
t
Trad
ing
and
busi
ness
lic
enci
ng
No
of d
ays t
o is
sue
a tra
ding
lice
nce
5C1C
Issu
ance
of
tradi
ng li
cens
es
No.
of b
usin
esse
s lic
ense
d by
regi
on.
64
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3:
Incr
ease
Acc
ess t
o Fi
nanc
eM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY20
21/2
2
MT
IC
Coo
pera
tive
regu
latio
nco
oper
ativ
es w
ith
unqu
alifi
ed a
udits
40%
HN
/AR
egis
tratio
n an
d su
perv
isio
nTo
tal n
umbe
r of
Coo
pera
tives
37
,853
H
Coo
pera
tives
aud
ited
10H
No.
of c
oope
rativ
es
audi
ted
15
,000
H
Reg
ulat
ion
and
Supe
rvis
ion
of th
e se
ctor
Rat
e of
com
plia
nce
with
aud
it re
com
men
datio
ns.
60%
H90
%H
Com
plia
nce,
M
onito
ring
and
Enfo
rcem
ent o
f Sc
hem
es a
nd
Serv
ice
Prov
ider
s
Offs
ite in
spec
tion
sche
mes
10H
Ons
ite In
spec
tion
Sche
mes
Due
Dili
genc
e on
Se
rvic
e Pr
ovid
ers
20H
R
egul
atio
ns a
nd
sets
of
Gui
delin
es
deve
lope
d
7H10
H
Sche
mes
& S
ervi
ce
prov
ider
s lic
ense
d64
H10
0H25
H
serv
ice
prov
ider
s
25
H34
H
Sect
or c
ompl
aint
s ad
dres
sed
N/A
70%
H
UB
BR
A
Expa
ndin
g of
co
vera
ge o
f pe
nsio
n se
ctor
Pens
ion
Ass
et to
G
DP
ratio
9%C
15%
CM
onito
ring
of
Des
igns
and
In
vest
men
ts
Res
earc
hers
and
Sec
tor
Surv
eys
01C
Pens
ion
cove
rage
ra
tio12
%C
20%
CEd
ucat
ion
and
Cam
paig
nsN
o. o
f tra
inin
gs a
nd
wor
ksho
ps2C
2C
Nat
iona
l Id
entit
y R
egis
trat
ion
Aut
hori
ty
Issu
ance
of
Nat
iona
l ID
Prop
ortio
n of
the
popu
latio
n w
ith ID
.49
%C
R
egis
terin
g fo
r na
tiona
l ID
Perc
enta
ge o
f po
pula
tion
regi
ster
ed16
.4%
C
Issu
ance
of B
irths
C
ertifi
cate
sSh
are
of re
gist
ered
bi
rths
Proc
essi
ng a
nd
issu
ance
of c
ards
No
of C
ards
issu
ed
(Mill
ions
): 14
.6C
65
NAT
ION
AL
STR
ATEG
Y F
OR
PR
IVAT
E SE
CTO
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
Obj
ectiv
e 3:
Incr
ease
Acc
ess t
o Fi
nanc
eM
DA
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce
Rol
eSe
rvic
e In
dica
tor
Bas
elin
e FY
14/
15Ta
rget
FY
21/
22R
outin
e Act
ivity
Rou
tine
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
FY14
/15
Targ
et
FY20
21/2
2
MoF
PED
Cap
italiz
atio
n of
U
DB
Ann
ual c
hang
e in
U
DB
Cap
italiz
atio
n1.
2%29
83%
U
Uga
nda
Dev
elop
men
t B
ank
Fina
ncin
g fo
r de
velo
pmen
tSh
are
of lo
ng te
rm
cred
it in
tota
l cre
dit30
93%
C95
%C
App
licat
ions
, as
sess
men
t and
m
anag
emen
t
Non
- per
form
ing
loan
s at
( UD
B)
28%
C15
%C
29A
nnua
l bud
get p
erfo
rman
ce re
port
2015
/16
30U
gand
a D
evel
opm
ent B
ank,
Sub
mis
sion
to M
FPED
.
66
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
KEY TO REFERENCES
KEY SPECIFIC REFERENCE OF SOURCE OF DATAA Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Performance of the
Economy June 2015B Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Annual budget performance
report 2015/16C Written submissions to Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
(MFPED) by respective Agency.D Ministry of Finance, Planning & Economic Development, Annual Internal Audit Report
2015/16E Ministry of works and transport, Annual performance report 2014/15F ICT Sector Strategy & Investment plan 2015-2020G Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Ltd, Grid Development Plan 2015-2030.H Ministry of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, Sector Development plan 2015/16-
20119/20I Skilling Uganda, BITVET Strategic Plan 2012/13-2021/22J Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquates Annual Budget Performance Report
2014/15K Uganda Export Promotion paper at 7th annual sector review conference2016/17L Uganda Free Zones Authority, Strategic Plan 2015/16-2019/20M KCCA Strategic Plan 2014/15-2018/19N Uganda National Bureau of standards, Written submission to MFPED June 2016O Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquates Annual Budget Performance Report
2014/15P Ministry of Lands, Housing & Urban Development, Annual Budget Performance Report
2015/16R Uganda National Agricultural Extension Strategy 2016/17-2022/21S Ministry of Water and environment, National Irrigation Master plan 2035
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTORDEVELOPMENT
BOOSTING INVESTOR CONFIDENCE FOR ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENTAND INDUSTRIALISATION
2017
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
2017/18-2021/22
Plot 2-12, Appollo Kaggwa RoadP.O. Box 8147, Kampala
Telephone: +256 414 707000www.finance.go.ug
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTORDEVELOPMENT
BOOSTING INVESTOR CONFIDENCE FOR ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENTAND INDUSTRIALISATION
2017
2017/18-2021/22
Plot 2-12, Appollo Kaggwa RoadP.O. Box 8147, Kampala
Telephone: +256 414 707000www.finance.go.ug evelopment Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic D