the network balance model of trauma resolution · pdf file•loss of mpfc and dlpfc...

23
The Network Balance Model of Trauma Resolution D. Eric Chamberlin MD “Balance the Networks and Memory will Process.” D. Eric Chamberlin MD The Trauma Paradox 2752 New York area residents, 6 months after 9/11. “Across the range of exposure conditions the prevalence of resilience was more than 50%…” A lot of people didn’t develop PTSD. (On the other hand a lot of people did develop PTSD.) Trauma Paradox - Developing PTSD is a “normal” response, and not developing PTSD is a “normal” response. A useful physiological model of psychological trauma, and its resolution, must account for this paradox. Bonanno et al. 2006 Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Upload: dinhnhan

Post on 10-Mar-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Network Balance Model of Trauma Resolution

D. Eric Chamberlin MD

!

“Balance the Networks and Memory will Process.”

D. Eric Chamberlin MD

The Trauma Paradox• 2752 New York area residents, 6 months after 9/11.

• “Across the range of exposure conditions the prevalence of resilience was more than 50%…”

• A lot of people didn’t develop PTSD. (On the other hand a lot of people did develop PTSD.)

• Trauma Paradox - Developing PTSD is a “normal” response, and not developing PTSD is a “normal” response.

• A useful physiological model of psychological trauma, and its resolution, must account for this paradox.

Bonanno et al. 2006

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Paradigm shifts within NBM

• The Predictive Brain

• Memory Re-consolidation

• The Network Basis of Psychopathology

• The Science of Consciousness

• Cortical Memory Networks . “Cognits”

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Copernican Revolution of Neuroscience

• Traditional view: the Brain gathers sensation and assembles it into a model of the world directly.

• Contemporary View: the Brain generates and maintains a model of the world using sensation as feedback about the accuracy of its model. Knowledge of the world is indirect.

• Perception is an active probe the brain uses to test its model. An experiment to test a hypothesis.

• The Brain runs a simulation of reality, a parallel world that gets updated when sensation doesn’t match predictions.

Hohwy 2013 Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Daniel Kish - “Bat Man”

• “Blind as a Bat: seeing without eyesight.” YouTube

• Very sparse sensory data (echoes), therefore “seeing” the world in 3-D only possible if the brain provides the model which is then fine tuned by the sparse sensory data from the world.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Brain as Crime Artist• Crime artist (police sketch artist) sits in a room, like the brain in the skull.

• No direct access to the real world.

• Access to the real world is through witnesses who come in, like sensation coming into the brain.

• Witnesses are imprecise and inaccurate, like sensations.

• Crime artist using “generic” memories of faces draws a model, a prediction of what the suspect looks and tests it with the witnesses- How is this?

• Witnesses respond by saying what’s wrong with particular details, and the crime artist updates the model.

• The more times this cycle is repeated, the closer the drawing is to the suspect in the real world, despite lack of direct access and imperfect data.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Drawing what you’ve never seen.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Brain Internal Model

• PBS “The Brain” with David Eagleman - What is Reality?

Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

Perception as “best guess”

• “Your brain hallucinates your conscious reality” TED- Anil Seth

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Predictive Brain• The brain is a sophisticated hypothesis testing mechanism

that is constantly trying to minimize prediction errors using sensation as feedback.

• Minimizing prediction errors can account for perception, learning, action, attention, goal directed behavior, functional specialization in a statistically based, rigorous methodology.

• Only interested in prediction error. Predicted stimuli ignored.

• The brain predicts by generating models based primarily on experience i.e. memory.

Friston 2012, Friston 2009, Bar 2009, Strelnikov 2010Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Predictive Brain in action• Police entering apt. in rough neighborhood at night…

“When a gun is not a gun” NYT 4/19/15

• tennis serve- predicting bounce

• Insulin rise before a meal.

• Glucose rise before competition.

• Cortisol increase before rising in the morning.

• Generating hypotheses in psychotherapy.

• Predictions are based on memories.Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Memory Updating• Mismatch between what the brain predicts and what it senses (a

prediction error) opens a window of 4-6 hours during which memory can be updated. Learning.

• Memories are refined to enhance their efficiency and utility over time. Automatic and non-conscious.

• Changes mediating updating span intracellular gene induction to system level reorganization.

• Memories are balanced between stability vs. flexibility to be updated. Specific vs. general. Always a product of Trade-offs.

• Memories are like a sketch that captures some features better than others, and evolves with experience over time. Not a video.

Pedreria 2004, Dudai 2009, Kroes et al. 2012, Stickgold & Walker, 2007, Schiller et al. 2010Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

“Good Memory”• Is accurate allowing predictions to guide behavior.

• Is consistent with other memories in the system.

• Can be combined with other memories to extrapolate and predict things we haven’t directly experienced.

• Is capable of being updated. Dynamic.

• Optimized?

Schacter et al. 2007, Dudai 2009, Bar 2009, Lee 2009

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Mismatch Negativity• Brain’s response to stimulation that deviates from

what is predicted - marker of prediction error.

• EEG wave with a negative deflection that occurs after an unexpected stimulation e.g. series of the same auditory tone followed by a different tone.

• auditory, visual, somatosensory stimulation, violation of an abstract rule, grammatical rule etc.

• “When the power went out, the house became ….”

Naatanen 2007, Strelnikov 2007Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Summary-Predictive Brain• Brain makes a model.

• Runs experiments using sensation to test its model.

• Only interested in “prediction error”, when sensation doesn’t match the prediction. (when the model gets it wrong)

• Mismatch Negativity marks the error.

• Mismatch opens the window for memory updating.

• Memory and Model get updated improving predictive accuracy.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Triune Brain- Paul MacLean• ( 3 ) N e o c o r t e x

“thinking brain”-flexible responses

• (2) Limbic brain “emotional brain”-learned responses

• ( 1 ) B r a i n s t e m “Rept i le bra in” H a r d - w i r e d responses.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Brain Toggle• Under extreme stress,

control “toggles” to the older brain (2).

• Evolutionarily old, time t e s t e d / p r o v e n responses. Habits.

• Less flexible but faster and more reliable.

• With resolution of stress, control “toggles” back to the newer brain (3).

Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

!

• “Officers fired after beating man” YouTube

• “Marco Rubio short circuits, repeats same line 4 times during GOP debate” YouTube

Brain Toggle in Action

Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

Trauma Induced Imbalance• In Trauma control

toggles to the lower brain (2) but does not toggle back to the newer brain (3) when the stress is over.

• The lower brain remains in control w i t h o n g o i n g imbalance of whole brain.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Stress Induced Brain Imbalance• High Nor-epinephrine (NE) decreases Pre-frontal

cortex (PFC) neuronal firing and therefore “top-down” control.

• High NE enhances amygdala function and therefore “bottom up” control.

• High NE “gives the microphone” to the lower brain.

• (Moderate NE has the opposite effects thereby enhancing PFC “top-down” control when safe.)

Arnsten et al. 2015

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Guardian

• Extreme Stress shuts down prefrontal cortex turning control of behavior over to lower, older brain structures. Faster, more reliable, pre-programmed, survival driven behavior.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

PFC Hypo-function• Loss of mPFC mediated Context Processing.

• Results in failure to retrieve the appropriate contextual representation (analogy) for experience.

• Results in failure to inhibit retrieval of inappropriate memories.

• Results in failure of inhibition of amygdala yielding inappropriate emotional responses/poor affect regulation.

• Loss of dlPFC results in deficits in Working Memory.

• Loss of mPFC and dlPFC mediated integration of memory.

• Indexed and modulated by Heart Rate Variability (HRV)Thayer 2007, Thayer et al. 2004, Bar 2009, Liberzon 2016, Preston 2013

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Amygdala -“Yikes!”Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

PFC - “It’s all good!”Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

Working with Memory• “Working memory” more precisely conceptualized as

“Working with Memory” ( a problem solving function)

• the selection of task relevant information and activation of the corresponding circuits in the brain

• repeated cycles of selection and activation necessary for different stages of solving a problem

• “goal” must be held online, over time, with constantly changing particulars. Dynamic.

• Dorsolateral PFC - critical node in “Working with Memory”Goldberg 2009

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The New Memory Network Paradigm• “Cognit”= memory network.

• Memories are distributed in diverse regions of the prefrontal and posterior association cortex.

• Nested networks (cognits) of increasing size, complexity and abstraction from primary cortex to multi-modal association cortex.

• Cognits overlap and interconnect profusely.

• Integration occurs everywhere, but especially at the “top” among widely dispersed elements. “Working with Memory”

Fuster 2009, Merzenich 2014

Copyright © 2015 D. Eric Chamberlin

Where is the memory?

• Matthew Walker from PBS Nova-“Memory Hackers”.

Copyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

Episodic Memory Retrieval

Geib et al. 2017

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Consciousness-Dehaene• “Global Neuronal Workspace”-Consciousness is global information

broadcasting to distant cortical regions.

• When processing crosses a threshold there is “ignition” of a temporary network with synchronization of distant, specific brain regions in bi-directional communication.

• Allows information to be processed flexibly by a variety of different systems in different ways, for an arbitrarily long duration. Processing no longer reflexive.

• “Signatures of Consciousness” -patterns of brain activity that occur only if person having conscious experience.

• Dorsolateral PFC and FEF are anchor nodes in the GNWDehaene 2014

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Consciousness- The Tip of the Iceberg

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Consciouness-Workspace ignition

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Global Neuronal Workspace

Dehaene 2009

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Cross Referencing Sense Data

• PBS “The Brain” with David Eagleman

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

adapted from Arnsten 2009

When Stress turns off the PFC there is no “Working with Memory” or Context Processing!

Working Memory

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Context Process

Stress Reduces WM in dlPFC (2)

blue-green=regions activated in working memory taskred=failure to activate normally while under stress.

Qin et al. 2009

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Summary-Trauma induced imbalance

• Brain shifts control to more primitive structures as an adaptive response in extreme circumstances.

• High levels of nor-epinephrine turn off PFC.

• “Working with memory” is not available so information is not broadcast and diverse regions are not able to share information and integrate into a coherent representation. (Left with fragments.)

• When triggered, emotionally charged fragments stimulate high levels of nor-epi and imbalance persists.

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Restoring PFC Function aka Returning to “window of tolerance”

• Safety, control

• Increase Heart Rate Variability (e.g. using emWave)

• Eye Movements

• alpha 1 antagonist (prazosin)

• alpha 2A agonist (guanfacine, clonidine)

• SSRI’s

• Executive fxn. tests- e.g. simple calculationsCopyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Thayer 2007, Arntsen 2015, MacNamara et al. 2016

Resting State Networks• Brain networks identified using a variety of imaging

techniques. Most common- functional MRI (fMRI).

• Analogy to social networks e.g. “Pool club network” is “at rest” during the winter, but evidence can be seen in sporadic activity (emails) between members (nodes). In summer, network becomes activated with lots of activity between members. Membership may overlap with “Ski club network”. Some functions e.g. town-wide celebration may activate both networks.

• Patterns, but also flexibility in membership and activation.

• Not like a computer with fixed wiring and functions.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

3 Principal Networks

• Me Network -my past, my future, my relationships.

• Deal Network-deal with the external world. Direct the eyes.

• Feel Network-feeling and regulating the body and emotions.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Me Network

• Nodes in network: medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobule, medial and lateral temporal lobe

• Functions: my past, my future, my relationships. Context Processing and Prediction.

• Formally known as the Default Mode Network in the literature.

Buckner et al. 2008 , Raichle et al. 2007, Bar 2009Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Deal Network• Nodes in network: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontal eye fields, intraparietal sulcus, superior parietal lobule, posterior parietal cortex, middle temporal area.

• Function: Deal with the world. (Directed attention/cognition.) Working With Memory. Directing eye movements.

• Formally known as the Central Executive Network in the literature.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Buschman 2009, Bressler 2010

Deal vs. Me Network

Me-yellow, Deal-blue Shim et al. 2010

medial

lateral

Feel Network• Nodes in network: orbitofrontal cortices/anterior insula,

anterior cingulate, extensive connections to subcortical nuclei- amygdala, hypothalamus, ventral striatum periaqueductal grey.

• Functions: visceral sensation, autonomic and emotional regulation, reward processing. Mediates interactions between Me and Deal networks.

• Formally known as the Salience Network in the literature.

Menon et al. 2010, Menon 2011, Seeley 2007

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Me-Deal Network see-saw • When the Deal network increases in activity, the Me

network decreases in activity and vice versa. Mediated by the Feel network.

• Attention demanding tasks (Deal network) decrease “rumination” (Me network).

• Distraction takes mind off of problems.

Fox et al. 2005, Menon 2011, Wilson et al. 2014

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

The Feel Network SwitchMe Feel Deal

Copyright © 2015 D. Eric ChamberlinUddin 2015

3 Principle Networks

Shannon 2011 Feel-yellow, Me-green, Deal-red Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Effects of Stress on Network Balance

Hermans et al. 2014

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Core of Network Balance • Feel network sits between the Me and Deal networks

having a panoramic view of the external and internal environments where it integrates external sensation with internal visceral sensation, emotion, and cognition.

• Feel network selectively and flexibly recruits the Me and Deal networks, thus allocating functional resources depending on circumstances.

• “deficits in engagement and disengagement of these three core neuro-cognitive networks play a significant role in many psychiatric disorders”

Barbas et al. 2010, Menon 2011Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Role of Eye Movements 1.

• Eye movements turn on the “explore mode” by activation of the Deal network (CEN). This re-directs processing resources to activity in the external world. Sampling of sensation increases facilitating updating with new information e.g. “it’s over”.

• “saccades are optimal experiments in which data are gathered to test hypotheses or beliefs”

Hoffman et al. 2013, Dudai 2009, Kroes 2012, Rajkai et al. 2008, Friston et al. 2012

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Testing Hypothesis w Saccades

• Diana F 7-7-14 #14

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

How EMDR works: Network Balance Model

• Assessment activates Me and Feel networks with the poorly encoded memory.

• Eye movements activate Deal network, turning down Me network by the seesaw effect. Deal network has minimal connection to the limbic system therefore anxiety abruptly decreases.

• Eye movements increase sensory sampling of the present which triggers Mismatch Negativity prediction error as current sensation does not match the prediction of the poorly encoded memory.

• Memory becomes labile for updating and optimization to reduce prediction error and enhance predictive accuracy for the future.

• Repetition of procedural steps sequentially activates Me, Feel and Deal networks “manually” re-establishing dynamic network balance and fluid Dual Attention. “Network Balance Training”.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

Fine tuning network balance.• Dual Attention - balance Me and Deal networks which balances

retrieval vs. encoding in hippocampus, promoting integration.

• “Stay off the tracks” - avoid unnecessary activation of Deal network when networks balanced and processing.

• “Let whatever happens, happen”- encourage “surrender” to reduce Deal network activation.

• “Watch a movie” -decrease Feel network, increase Deal network. (“Detached observer”)

• Focus on Attachment - increase Feel network and interpersonal regulation via Social Vagus activation.

Richter et al. 2015, Lange 2003, Beauregard 2001, Porges 2012

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

“Looping” and Network Balance• Stuck on the same informational plateau. High distress, same

emotions, sensations, images etc.

• Not processing because networks not balanced.

• Change eye movements- speed or direction. Attempt to activate Deal network. Motion captures attention.(Habituation?)

• Focus on body sensation. All, most pronounced, tension from thwarted movement. Attempt to activate Feel network.

• Scan incident for more distressing element-visual, auditory. Activate Me Network.

• Cognitive interweave-information activation of Deal network.

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric ChamberlinShapiro 2001

!

“Balance the Networks and Memory will Process.”

D. Eric Chamberlin MD

Theta rhythm organizes Encoding vs. Retrieval in Hippocampus

adapted from Hasselmo & Stern 2014

Double Dutch

Theta Rhythm

Hippocampus

Cortex Cortex

Hippocampus

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Saccades drive Theta

Jutras et al. 2013

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Saccades organize Hippocampal Memory Function• Mammals explore the world using Saccadic eye movements.

• The hippocampus maps the world in both space and time as we explore and navigate.

• The hippocampus maps cognitive (cortical) space as it indexes episodic memory.

• Theta rhythm organizes hippocampal mapping i.e. past, current and future positions in time. (Critical to not confuse current perception w a memory)

• Saccadic eye movements reset Theta rhythm organizing hippocampal mapping.

• Searching external space with our eyes occurs simultaneously with searching internal (cortical) space with our hippocampus.

Meister & Buffalo 2015, Jutras et al. 2013, Hannula et al. 2010, Colgan 2016Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Eye movements coupled to Hippocampus

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

Hippocampus drives eye movements and

eye movements drive hippocampusLiu et al. 2016, Meister & Buffalo 2016, Shen et al. 2016, Jutras et al 2013, Colgan 2016,

Bochynska & Laeng 2015,Hannula et al. 2010, Scholz et al. 2014, Johannson 2014, Micic et al. 2010, Ehrilchman 2007

Role of Eye Movements 2.• Restore network balance by activating the Deal Network

(CEN, including frontal eye fields and dorsolateral PFC).

• Reduce affect by tipping Network Seesaw to Deal Network that has minimal connection to subcortical affective centers.

• Increase sensory sampling which (in trauma) increases prediction error driving memory updating.

• Optimize memory retrieval and encoding by resetting theta rhythm and organizing information flow in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.

• Drive generation of associations. (Searching the world with eyes and searching memory are coupled functions.)

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

EM Exploration of Hippocampal memory space

• Diana F 10-8-14 Clip#15

Copyright © 2014 D. Eric Chamberlin

EMDR-“lather, rinse, repeat”• Accessing memory creates prediction. EM’s serve vision by

sampling the world and testing the prediction. Resulting prediction error drives memory updating. Appears desensitizing.

• Once prediction has been tested, additional EM’s serve to search the traumatic memory resulting in additional predictions. Appears stimulating.

• Further EM’s then sample the world testing the new predictions.

• As the “channels” of the memory get “cleared out” amygdala driven nor-epi decreases and balance begins to tip back towards PFC control with improved working memory function. As this occurs EM driven search broadens from local (trauma) recall to global recall that contacts positive self and world memories. Memory is then fully integrated.

How does EMDR work?• EMDR works by increasing Prediction Error and

triggering Memory Re-consolidation.

PBS The Brain w David EaglemanCopyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin

As seen on YouTube!

Copyright © 2017 D. Eric Chamberlin

That’s just my theory, but I think it’s correct. -Woody Allen

Chamberlin applied Neuroscience

!

[email protected]

Further Reading• PBS The Brain with David Eagleman. DVD

• Making up the Mind: How the Brain creates our Mental world. Chris Frith

• Consciousness and the Brain. Stanislaw Dehaene

• The Invisible Gorilla: How our intuitions deceive us. Christopher Chablis

• The New Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes in a Complex World. Elkhonen Goldberg

• Wider than the Sky: The Phenomenal gift of Consciousness. Gerald Edelman

• Surfing Uncertainty. Andy Clark

• The Predictive Mind. Jakob HohwyCopyright © 2016 D. Eric Chamberlin