the oregon-oxford debate
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DEBATE•Formal type of argumentation
•Intelligent exchange of points between the affirmative and negative sides
![Page 3: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
In debate
Proposition
![Page 4: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Proposition
Topic or issue that is argued
upon
![Page 5: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
In exploring
Do some ORGANIZED research!
Utilize the library-it’s the first source
Do some interviewsTake down notes!Refer to the web
![Page 6: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
introductiondiscussi
onconclusi
on
Parts of an argument
![Page 7: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
To arouse the interest of the audience
To explain the proposition
To state the issues to be debated
To state the parameters of the debate
introduction
![Page 8: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
You should arouse the attention of
your audience.
REMEMBER!
![Page 9: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Make them see that the
topic is important.
How?
![Page 10: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Show them that the topic
is timely.
How?
![Page 11: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Preserve a favorable attitude.
How?
![Page 12: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Second aim of intro is to
explain the proposition.
REMEMBER!
![Page 13: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Define all important words. (1st
A)
How?
![Page 14: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Set the parameters/ limit of the
debate (1st A)
How?
![Page 15: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The whole idea must be clearly explained.
How?
![Page 16: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Present a short but
lively history of the topic.
How?
![Page 17: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Third aim of intro is to state the ISSUES.
REMEMBER!
![Page 18: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a side.
UNDERSTAND
![Page 19: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a side.
UNDERSTAND
![Page 20: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)
•How would the proposition affect
SPCIS? The students?
![Page 21: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)
•Is there really a need to implement the
proposition?
![Page 22: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
introductiondiscussi
onconclusi
on
Parts of an argument
![Page 23: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
OPPOSING SIDES
Affirmative
Negative
![Page 24: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
AFFIRMATIVEBurden of proofProve all aspects of the caseCannot win based on inability of the negative
![Page 25: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
NEGATIVEBurden of rebuttalMust destroy either the necessity, beneficiality and practicability of (+)
Cannot discuss anything the affirmative didn’t discuss
![Page 26: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(+)
NECESSITY
BENEFICIALITYPRACTICABILITY
![Page 27: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(-)NON-NECESSITY
NON-BENEFICIALITY
NON-PRACTICABILITY
![Page 28: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
NECESSITYNeed for the propositionDiscusses the presence/absence of an inherent flaw in the status quo
![Page 29: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
BENEFICIALITYDiscusses the advantages or disadvantages of adopting or rejecting the resolution
![Page 30: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
PRACTICABILITYfeasibility of a proposition
includes matter of:*law *clamor *finance
![Page 31: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
PARTS OF THE DEBATE(+)Constructive speechInterpellation
Rebuttal
![Page 32: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Constructive speechpresentation of each
team member’s arguments and
evidence for each aspect of the case
![Page 33: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
InterpellationThe opportunity for
the opposing debater to ask
questions regarding the speech of the
speaker
![Page 34: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
RebuttalThe summary and
defense of each team’s arguments and
evidence, to be delivered by the team
captain
![Page 35: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Speaker roles1A speaker-NECESSITY1N speaker-NON NECESSITY
![Page 36: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Speaker roles2A speaker-BENEFICIALITY2N speaker-NON BENEFICIALITY
![Page 37: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Speaker roles3A speaker-PRACTICABILITY3N speaker-NON PRACTICABILITY
![Page 38: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Outline of speech-1A
I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,and task of each memberA. Define the termsB. Give the status quo
![Page 39: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Outline of speech-1A
-what is the status quo?-what’s wrong with it?C. State your standIII. CaselineA. State all your argumentsfirst
![Page 40: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Outline of speech-1A
B. Go back, then strengthen each oneC. Always give transition.IV. Conclusion
![Page 41: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Outline of speech-1N
I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,Negate or show clash towards it.III. Rebut the 1st speakers’arguments
![Page 42: The Oregon-Oxford Debate](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013011/54787635b4af9fa6478b478f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Outline of speech-1N
IV. Caseline-same as thecomponents of caseline of 1Av. Conclusion