the paper 2 & 3 bibleknelsonhota.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/history-paper...• use a...

4
Paul Hart • Li Po Chun United World College • Hong Kong • [email protected] THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY WRITE A DP HISTORY ESSAY FOR 2017 CURRICULUM FALL 2017 1 % OF GRADE HL SL 25 45 Paper 2 is based on 12 world history topics. Students must answer two questions chosen from different topics. The total exam length is 1 hour 30 minutes (45 minutes per essay). 1. Selecting the Question Read all the questions from the topics (P2) and sections (P3) you have covered in class. The First step in writing a good paper is choosing an appropriate question. When you choose a question make sure you understand the (command/key/ ambiguous) terms in the question and the chronological, geographic, and thematic scope of the question, and that you have appropriate historical evidence to support any response. You should feel con$ident with the question you choose. 2. Understanding the Question “Question analysis means reading the entire question, breaking down the task into constituent parts or themes and then avoiding the temptation to reproduce an avalanche of information whose relevance to the speci$ic demands is quite marginal.” – May 2009 History Subject Report “Understanding the task (question analysis) is essential for success in the examination. Candidates need to be aware of the demands of the command terms and to take note of any dates provided in the question.” May 2010 History Subject Review Read the question three to four times. Make sure you know what it’s asking: 1. What type of a response does the command term demand? 2. Are there nebulous/key terms in the question that need to be deFined? 3. What is the (chronological, regional, thematic) scope of the question? Answer the question as it is, not as you want it to be! Do not just blindly agree with whatever the question asks. (ex. “To what extent were dandelions important in Hitler’s rise to power?”) Don’t be afraid to challenge any built in assumptions (ex. “Why were the intentions of those responsible for treaties rarely fulFilled?”) 3. Planning the Essay “A thematic approach to essays, when appropriate, usually provides a more successful outcome. The chronological narrative often tends towards descriptive writing and curtails analytical treatment of topics.” – May 2010 History Subject Report Plan all your essays before you begin writing your First one Take 4-6 minutes to plan each essay; you may feel like this is a waste of time but it will save you time overall and will mean you do most of your thinking at the start, allowing you to spend the rest of your time writing Write your planning in a spare answer booklet so that you can keep your planning in front of you as you write Organize your arguments/paragraphs into suitable themes as thematic approaches generally score better than chronological accounts After you have established your arguments, write down related key names, policies, dates, events, key actors and statistics in point form Use pertinent and appropriate information only; make sure your arguments and historical knowledge are relevant to the question (this will help prevent your writing going off on a tangent) Now begin writing the essay question you are most conFident with Command Terms Compare - Give an account of the similarities between two items or situations, referring to both of them throughout. Contrast - Give an account of the differences between two items, referring to both of them throughout. Discuss - Offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence. Evaluate - Make an appraisal weighing up the strengths and limitations of an argument or concept. Examine - Consider an argument or concept in a way that uncovers the assumptions and interrelationships of the issue. To what extent - Consider the merits or otherwise of an argument or concept. Opinions and conclusions should be presented clearly and supported with appropriate evidence and sound argument. Note: The primary differences between a “to what extent” question and an “evaluate” question are: 1) that a “to what extent” question opens the door to the role other factors played, while an “evaluate” question demands that the student focus on the topic being evaluated, and 2) an “evaluate” questions require more of a judgment or clear stance on the question. % OF GRADE HL SL 35 N/A Paper 3 is based on 18 sections of the regional depth study. Students must answer three questions. Unlike the Paper 2, students may choose two answers from the same section. The total exam length is 2 hours 30 minutes (50 minutes per essay). Scope Chronology Region Theme (cultural, economic, legal, political, social, territorial, technological)

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLEknelsonhota.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/History-Paper...• Use a concluding sentence that summarizes the paragraph and ties it back to your thesis; don’t

P a u l H a r t • L i P o C h u n U n i t e d Wo r l d C o l l e g e • H o n g K o n g • p a u l @ l p c u w c . e d u . h k

THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY WRITE A DP HISTORY ESSAY

FOR 2017 CURRICULUM FALL 2017 1

% OF GRADE

HL SL

25 45

Paper2isbasedon12worldhistorytopics.Studentsmustanswertwoquestionschosenfromdifferenttopics.Thetotalexamlengthis1hour30minutes(45minutesperessay).

1.SelectingtheQuestion• Readallthequestionsfromthetopics(P2)andsections(P3)youhavecoveredinclass.

• TheFirststepinwritingagoodpaperischoosinganappropriatequestion.• Whenyouchooseaquestionmakesureyouunderstandthe(command/key/ambiguous)termsinthequestionandthechronological,geographic,andthematicscopeofthequestion,andthatyouhaveappropriatehistoricalevidencetosupportanyresponse.

• Youshouldfeelcon$identwiththequestionyouchoose.2.UnderstandingtheQuestion“Questionanalysismeansreadingtheentirequestion,breakingdownthetaskintoconstituentpartsorthemesandthenavoidingthetemptationtoreproduceanavalancheofinformationwhoserelevancetothespeci$icdemandsisquitemarginal.”–May2009HistorySubjectReport

“Understandingthetask(questionanalysis)isessentialforsuccessintheexamination.Candidatesneedtobeawareofthedemandsofthecommandtermsandtotakenoteofanydatesprovidedinthequestion.”May2010HistorySubjectReview

• Readthequestionthreetofourtimes.Makesureyouknowwhatit’sasking:1. Whattypeofaresponsedoesthecommandtermdemand?2. Aretherenebulous/keytermsinthequestionthatneedtobedeFined?3. Whatisthe(chronological,regional,thematic)scopeofthequestion?

• Answerthequestionasitis,notasyouwantittobe!• Donotjustblindlyagreewithwhateverthequestionasks.(ex.“TowhatextentweredandelionsimportantinHitler’srisetopower?”)

• Don’tbeafraidtochallengeanybuiltinassumptions(ex.“WhyweretheintentionsofthoseresponsiblefortreatiesrarelyfulFilled?”)

3.PlanningtheEssay“Athematicapproachtoessays,whenappropriate,usuallyprovidesamoresuccessfuloutcome.Thechronologicalnarrativeoftentendstowardsdescriptivewritingandcurtailsanalyticaltreatmentoftopics.”–May2010HistorySubjectReport

• PlanallyouressaysbeforeyoubeginwritingyourFirstone• Take4-6minutestoplaneachessay;youmayfeellikethisisawasteoftimebutitwillsaveyoutimeoverallandwillmeanyoudomostofyourthinkingatthestart,allowingyoutospendtherestofyourtimewriting

• Writeyourplanninginaspareanswerbookletsothatyoucankeepyourplanninginfrontofyouasyouwrite

• Organizeyourarguments/paragraphsintosuitablethemesasthematicapproachesgenerallyscorebetterthanchronologicalaccounts

• Afteryouhaveestablishedyourarguments,writedownrelatedkeynames,policies,dates,events,keyactorsandstatisticsinpointform

• Usepertinentandappropriateinformationonly;makesureyourargumentsandhistoricalknowledgearerelevanttothequestion(thiswillhelppreventyourwritinggoingoffonatangent)

• NowbeginwritingtheessayquestionyouaremostconFidentwith

Command Terms

Compare-Giveanaccountofthesimilaritiesbetweentwoitemsorsituations,referringtobothofthemthroughout.

Contrast-Giveanaccountofthedifferencesbetweentwoitems,referringtobothofthemthroughout.

Discuss-Offeraconsideredandbalancedreviewthatincludesarangeofarguments,factorsorhypotheses.Opinionsorconclusionsshouldbepresentedclearlyandsupportedbyappropriateevidence.

Evaluate-Makeanappraisalweighingupthestrengthsandlimitationsofanargumentorconcept.

Examine-Consideranargumentorconceptinawaythatuncoverstheassumptionsandinterrelationshipsoftheissue.

Towhatextent-Considerthemeritsorotherwiseofanargumentorconcept.Opinionsandconclusionsshouldbepresentedclearlyandsupportedwithappropriateevidenceandsoundargument.

Note:Theprimarydifferencesbetweena“towhatextent”questionandan“evaluate”questionare:1)thata“towhatextent”questionopensthedoortotheroleotherfactorsplayed,whilean“evaluate”questiondemandsthatthestudentfocusonthetopicbeingevaluated,and2)an“evaluate”questionsrequiremoreofajudgmentorclearstanceonthequestion.

% OF GRADE

HL SL

35 N/A

Paper3isbasedon18sectionsoftheregionaldepthstudy.Studentsmustanswerthreequestions.UnlikethePaper2,studentsmaychoosetwoanswersfromthesamesection.Thetotalexamlengthis2hours30minutes(50minutesperessay).

Scope• Chronology• Region• Theme(cultural,economic,legal,political,social,territorial,technological)

Page 2: THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLEknelsonhota.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/History-Paper...• Use a concluding sentence that summarizes the paragraph and ties it back to your thesis; don’t

P a u l H a r t • L i P o C h u n U n i t e d Wo r l d C o l l e g e • H o n g K o n g • p a u l @ l p c u w c . e d u . h k

FOR 2017 CURRICULUM FALL 2017 2

Introduction“Higherawardsalsotendedtogotothosecandidateswhowereabletoeffectivelyde$ine/explainkeytermsattheoutset.”–May2009HistorySubjectReport• Inyourintroductionyouwanttobesureto:

• Setthehistoricalcontext• Clarifyanykeyterms(totalwar,guerrillawarfare,ideology,propaganda,militarism,brinksmanship)ornebulousterms(success,circumstances,modern)fromthequestion

• Yourintroductionshouldnarrowfromabroadoverviewofthehistoricalcontexttoathesis,whichdirectlyanswersthequestion

Thesis• Thethesisshouldbethelastsentence(s)ofyourintroduction

• Itshoulddirectlyanswerthequestionbyusingthelanguageofthequestion

• Itshouldstatethemainideayouplantoprove;itistheonestatementyouwouldmakeifyoucouldonlymakeonestatementabouttheessayquestion

• AnidealthesisnotonlydirectlyanswersthequestionbutalsospeciFiestheargumentsthatwillbepresentedinthebodyoftheessay

Body“Thebestresponsesrevealedcommandofchronology,taskidenti$ication,structureandabovealltheprovisionofrelevanthistoricaldetail.Itcannotbeemphasizedenoughthatanswersmustbesupportedbyreferencetohistoricalknowledge.”–May2010HistorySubjectReport

"Toomanyresponsessufferedfromagreat[lack]ofsuf$icient,relevant,accuratehistoricalknowledge.Sweepinggeneralizationsdevoidofconvincinghistoricalsubstantiationseemedtocharacterizetoomanyresponses.”–May2010HistorySubjectReport

• “Hit‘emhard”-Startyourbodyparagraphswithyourstrongestargument• Eachbodyparagraphshouldbeginwithatopicsentencethatintroducestheparagraph’smainargument;historicalevidenceshouldnotbepresentedinthetopicsentenceasthisleadstoanarrativeapproach

• Theuseoftopicsentencesensuresthatyouareansweringthequestionandsupportingyourthesisstatement,whileavoidingheadingoffonatangent

• Ideallythetopicsentenceneatlytransitionsfromthepreviousparagraph• Everythingintheparagraphshouldsupportthetopicsentence• Theuseofrhetoricalquestionscanhelpclarifyandchannelyourideas,whilesoundingsophisticated• Thebestsupportisinthecombinedformofexplanationandhistoricalknowledge• Avoidnarrativeordescriptiveaccounts(“storytelling”)• Usedatestodemonstrateyouunderstandchronologyandthehistoricalcontext• BespeciFicinyourresponses;avoidgeneralizations

SEXC-AnEasyGuidetoBodyParagraphWriting

Statement-introducetheparagraphwithyourtopic sentenceExplanation-developtheideaputforwardinyourtopic sentence;“Fleshitout”eXample-providehistoricalknowledge,examples, detailsandstatisticstosupportyourargumentConcludingstatement-restateyourargumentandlink itbacktoyourthesisstatement,demonstrating howtheparagraphservestoproveyourthesis

UsingHistoricalVocabularyTrytoincorporatetheacademiclanguageintoyouressay,suchas:hegemony,irredentist,ratify,geopolitical,sovereignty,casusbelli,unilateralism,Manichean,etc.

RecipeforDistaster(aka.Don’tDoThis!!!)

• Avoidusingnon-academiclanguageorslang• Useaconcludingsentencethatsummarizestheparagraphandtiesitbacktoyourthesis;don’tFinishyourparagraphwithaquotefromahistorian

Page 3: THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLEknelsonhota.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/History-Paper...• Use a concluding sentence that summarizes the paragraph and ties it back to your thesis; don’t

P a u l H a r t • L i P o C h u n U n i t e d Wo r l d C o l l e g e • H o n g K o n g • p a u l @ l p c u w c . e d u . h k

GeneralTips• TheFirstessayyouwriteshouldbetheoneyou’remostconFidentin.However,don’tspendmorethan50minutes(P2)or60minutes(P3)onyourFirstpaperasyourisknothavingenoughtimeforyourother(s)

• Don’tusetheFirstperson(saying“Hitlerwasapoormilitarytactician,”ismorepowerfulthansaying“IthinkHitlerwasapoormilitarytactician.”)

• Avoidhypotheticals(useis,was,andwill,notcanandcould)• Writeconsistentlyinthepasttense• Donotusewhiteout.;crossoutunwantedwordsbydrawingalinethroughthem

• Usetermsfromthelanguageoftheeventyou’restudying(latifundistas,bainianguochi,Wehrmacht)

• Textbookauthorsaren’thistorians• Avoidcliches(“allinall”),superlativesthatyoucan’tsupport(all,every,none,never)andtheuseofetc.ore.g.

• Ifyourealizethereistextyouwanttoaddtoaparagraph,trytoadditlaterthatsamepage,notattheendofyouressay

Historiography“Historiographyisnotthebe-allandend-allofhistoryessaywriting:itshouldnotbeasubstitute/replacementforsolidfactualknowledge,accuratechronologyandsequencingwhichmustformthebasisofanyeffectiveessays.”–May2009HistorySubjectReport

“Candidatesthrowaroundtermslikerevisionist,intentionalist,structuralist,orthodox,etc.withoutrealunderstandingofthetermsandwithoutanyrealappreciationofthebasisofevidencewhicheachoftheseschoolsusesintheirargumentation.”–May2010HistorySubjectReport

• Historiographyisusefulbutshouldbeusedtosupportarguments,notinlieuofthem

• Avoidnamedroppingschoolsofthought(orthodox,revisionist,post-revisionistschools)withoutdemonstratingsomeunderstandingofhow/when/whytheydeveloped

• Quotingacademichistoriansismuchmoreappropriateandfruitfulthanquotingtheauthorsofschooltextbooks

• Themarkbandawardsstudentswhoevaluatedifferentapproachestohistoricaleventsandusehistoriographytosupporttheirargumentmorethanstudentswhosimplystatedifferenthistoricalviews.

FOR 2017 CURRICULUM FALL 2017 3

Conclusion• BrieFlysummarizeyourarguments,drawthemtogetheranddemonstratehowtheysupportyourthesis(two-threesentences).Ittotal,yourconclusionshouldnotbemorethanFivesentences.

• Aimtoincludesomebigpicturethinkinginyourconclusionthatlinksyourquestiontothekeyconceptsofthecourse(seepage4).Forexample,“WhileitisnexttoimpossibleforthehistoriantodeFinitivelyidentifythreeconcreteandprimarycauses…”or“Whilepromotingchange,thelateQingreformsrepresentedsigniFicantcontinuitywithChina’spast.

• Ifyourunoutoftime,skipwritingaconclusionsoyoucanwriteagoodFinalbodyparagraph

• Don’tintroduceanynewinformation

CommonlyMisspelledWords

AggressiveDependentDisastrous

LedSeparate

Page 4: THE PAPER 2 & 3 BIBLEknelsonhota.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/History-Paper...• Use a concluding sentence that summarizes the paragraph and ties it back to your thesis; don’t

P a u l H a r t • L i P o C h u n U n i t e d Wo r l d C o l l e g e • H o n g K o n g • p a u l @ l p c u w c . e d u . h k

FOR 2017 CURRICULUM FALL 2017 4

10CommandmentsofHistoryEssayWriting

Thoushaltnot…1.UsetheFinalmomentsbeforetheexamtomadlycram2.Story-tell

Thoushalt…3.Givegreatthoughttoquestionselection4.Readthequestionandknowthouscope5.DeFinekeytermsinthyintro6.Finishthyintrowithathesis7.Includeargumentsinthythesis8.Usedates,dates,dates9.Beginparagraphswithtopicsentences10.Believeinthyself

ThePaper2&3Criteria(SimpliYied)• Theresponseisfocusedonthedemandsandimplicationsofthequestion

•Wellstructuredandeffectivelyorganized• Responseisclearandcoherent•Knowledgeisdetailed(P3),accurateandrelevant• Eventsareunderstoodwithintheirhistoricalcontext

• Clearunderstandingofhistoricalconcepts(seeright)

• Appropriateandrelevantexamplessupportanalysis/evaluation

• Differentperspectivesareevaluated

• Well-developedcriticalanalysis(P3)

• Mainpointsaresubstantiated• Conclusionisconsistentwithevidence

CopingwithStress• Getagoodnight’ssleepbeforeyourexam• BeconFidententeringtheexamknowingyou’vedoneallyoucantoprepare

• Takeaseriesofdeepbreathswhileclosingyoureyes• Usepositivesilentselftalk(“Iknowthis”,“Iamsmart”,“IamgoingtobeFine”)

• Putthingsinperspective–let’sbehonest,it’sjustaHistoryPaper!

CommonP2/P3Mistakes• Forgettingtoincludedatesintheessay• Confusingmethodsandconditions• MisusingthetermsUSSR/Russia• Mixingup19thcenturyand1900s

CommonP2Mistakes• Answeringtwoquestionsfromthesametopicarea

• Answeringquestionsontopic11(twentiethcenturywars)usingexamplesfromoutsidethetwentiethcentury(e.g.Sino-JapaneseWar,OpiumWars)

• Failingtoobservetheneedtoprovideexamplesfromtwodifferentregions• FailingtodistinguishbetweenriseandruleofSPS(Topic3)

AttheEndoftheEssay• Makesurethequestionnumbersarewritteninthelefthandmarginandmatchthequestionyouactuallywroteon

• Filloutyourcandidateandpage#s

• Crossoutanymaterialyoudonotwantmarked

ConceptsChangeContinuityCausationConsequenceSigniFicancePerspective

HittingtheCriteriaEvaluatingdifferentperspectives-integratehistoriographyorshowdifferentwaysoflookingattheissue(“thoughitmaybeargued…)Demonstratingconceptualknowledge-makeexplicitsomeofthesixconceptsinthecourseUnderstandingHistoricalcontext-usedatesorcauseandeffectStructuredandorganized-usetopicandconcludingsentencesthatusethelanguageofthequestion