the phylogenetics project data revealed!

22
The phylogenetics project data revealed! October 4, 2010 OEB 192

Upload: kerem

Post on 23-Feb-2016

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The phylogenetics project data revealed!. October 4, 2010 OEB 192. Geographic Distribution. Pathogen = Salmonella Typhi. Why so little turnover?. Letters indicate antibiotic resistant haplotypes. Selection less effective due to “carriers” with no symptoms!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

The phylogenetics project data revealed!

October 4, 2010OEB 192

Page 2: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Geographic Distribution

Pathogen = Salmonella Typhi

Page 3: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Why so little turnover?

Letters indicate antibiotic resistant haplotypes

Selection less effective due to “carriers” with no symptoms!

Page 4: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Codon Usage Bias & Selection

October 4, 2010OEB 192

Page 5: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Degenerate Code

Page 6: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Codon Usage BiasNon-random usage of codons

Rickettsia (bacteria) - Winkler 1988

Percent codon usage in family

Codons for each amino acid

Preferredargininecodon

Unpreferredargininecodon

Page 7: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Why non-random codon usage?

Let’s look at tRNA

Page 8: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Codons correspond to anticodons on tRNAs

Page 9: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Unequal numbers of tRNAs

There are six leucine codons

So, there are six corresponding tRNAs

tRNA copy number differences

E. Coli - Ikemura 1981

Page 10: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Species differ in codon usage biasWithout considering selection, why might different species have

different codon usage patterns?

Massey 2003

6 LeucineCodons

Page 11: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Different GC content alters codon usage

Mutational Bias

232 Eubacterial genomes - Guchte 2006

Page 12: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Is there selection on codon bias?

Four levels of evidence:1. Genome level2. Species level3. Tissue level4. Gene level

Evidence:Non-random patterns of codon usage that are difficult to explain without selection

Page 13: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Selection on codons1. Throughout genomes

Same organism, so not explained by differences in tRNA abundance or mutational bias

2. Between speciesWhy does the pattern decrease from E. coli to Human?

Drummond and Wilke 2008

expressionoptim

al c

odon

s

High Expression level genes have high codon bias

Page 14: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Selection on codons3. Within tissues

Plotkin et al 2004

Red = selectively expressed in human testes

Blue – selectively expressed In human ovaries

Page 15: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Selection on codons4. Within genes

Conserved sites more likely to use preferred codons

Likely tofind Preferred

codon

Likely tofind Unpreferred

codon

Species in alignemnt: Os = Oryza sativa, Pp = Physcomitrella patens, Dd = Dictyostelium discoideum, Hs = Homo sapiens, Dr = Danio reiro, Dm = Drosophila melanogaster, Sc = Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sp = Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pf = Plasmodium falciparum Gene = ubiquitin/SUMO-1 like protein

Wang et. al. 2001

Page 16: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Why is there selection on codons?Many hypotheses relate to speed and accuracy of translation

Translation Speed:Use of rare, unpreferred codons means the ribosome has to wait until a rare tRNA passes by.

Translation Accuracy:While waiting, the liklihood that the wrong tRNA inserts the wrong amino acid may increase.

Page 17: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Codon Bias and Translation Speed

Faster translation could allow more protein to be made:Might explain why highly expressed genes have more preferred codons*Does not explain within gene codon bias

Slow translation may be desirable when translating certain parts of the protein:Translation speed may correlate with folding

Some parts fold quickly, but some fold slowlyMeans sometimes unpreferred codons are advantageousSelection results from the cost of improper folding

How could translation speed pose a selective cost or advantage?

Hypotheses

Page 18: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Costs of improper protein folding

Page 19: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Codon Bias and Translation Accuracy

Errors in translation affect folding of protein product:Loss of functionWasted resourcesHarmful misfolded byproducts

Errors in translation affect function directly:Protein folds but cannot do it’s job

How do these address correlation between highly expressed genes and codon bias?

How could translation accuracy pose a selective cost or advantage?

Hypotheses

Page 20: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Weak selectionIs population size dependent – WHY?

Smaller populations are more stochastic:7 heads and 3 tails in 10 coin flips - possiblevs. 70,000 heads and 30,000 tails in 100,000 coin flips – rare!

Page 21: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

Weak selectionIs population size dependent

Other possible types of weak selection:

Do humans and mammals have selection on codons?

Much stronger in microbes!Allow us to study these patterns-ascertain mechanistic basis for selection-determine average effect of mutation

Genome sizeNumber of introns

Urrutia & Hurst 2003

Page 22: The  phylogenetics  project data revealed!

1. Could effect dN/dS (or other measures of selection)

...but, It’s very weak selection that doesn’t effect all genes

2. Useful to detect HGT

3. Helpful to consider when building genetically modified organisms

4. Medical applications

– Coleman et al. 2008

Implications of selection on synonymous sites

Pride et al 2006