the potential of htr for contributing to the reduction of...
TRANSCRIPT
The potential of HTR for contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions and security of energy
supply in Europe
Dominique Hittner
AREVA NP
Chairman of the (European) HTR Technology Network (HTR-TN)
What is HTR-TN?
� 20 partners from 11 EU countries�5 nuclear engineering companies�2 large utilities�1 worldwide graphite
manufacturing leader, �8 research centres, �3 universities
� Created in 2000 for supporting industrial development of HTR
� Roadmap for HTR deployment � 12 projects until now in FP5-6 & 7,
including the 20 M€ IP RAPHAEL�Participation in several non-
EURATOM projects� Rescue of European HTR know-how� International engagement� Presently new projects for the next
step are in preparation
AMEC Ansaldo Nucleare Areva NP Areva NC Belgonucléaire Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA) Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) Electricité de France (EdF) Empresarios Agrupados Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ) GrafTech Joint Research Centre of the E.C. (JRC) NEXIA Solutions Nuclear Research & consultancy Group (NRG) Nuclear Research Institute – Rěz (NRI) Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) Suez-Tractebel Universität Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
The European nuclear development strategy: the Strategic Research Agenda of
SNE-TP
Forms of energy utilisation
Oil43%
Gas16%
Electricity16%
Coal7%
Other renewables
4%
Combustible renewables
14%
Nuclear Electricitytoday
Heat
Elect rici ty
⇒Heat applications represent a huge market, larger than the electricity market
What is a HTR?
What is a HTR?
HTR = High Temperature Reactor
� Graphite moderated
⇒ Thermal neutron spectrum
⇒ Very negative temperature coefficient
� ~ 1000 T of graphite in a 600 MWth reactor
⇒ Very large thermal inertia
� Helium cooled
⇒ Chemical inertia
� Coated particle fuel (TRISO)
⇒ Keeps its leak tightness to fission products up to very high temperature (> 1600°C)
� Low power density (a few MW/m3
Vs ~ 100 MW/m3 in PWR)
High operating temperature
( 850°C with existing materials and fuel
Inherent safety features
Buffer 95µmInner
PyC 40µm
UO2 kernel 600µm
Outer PyC 40µm
SiC 35µm
“Modular” design, with passive safety,low power (( 600 MW),
competitive
What is a HTR?
HTR fuel cycles
� The HTR can burn different types of fuel (U, Pu, minor actinides, Th cycle) without design change� Very good Pu burner: 100% Pu cores
� HTR is compatible with closed cycle (U-Pu, Th-233U → thermal breeding): � A specific reprocessing head-end needed for breaking
particle coating layers and separating fuel kernels� Experience on breaking particles with mechanical
crushing (manufacturing)� New processes under development (ultrasonic pulses,
chemical or thermal degradation, pulsed current)
� It must still be verified that these processes work with irradiated fuel
� Once kernels separated, reprocessing with standard PUREX process for U fuel and with a similar process, THOREX, developed up to the industrial pilot for Th cycle.
Weapon Pu
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Re
lativ
e p
luto
nium
isot
ope
qua
ntiti
es
LWR spent fuel option
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
N et co nsumpt io nP u39: ~51%T o ta l P u: ~27%
GT-MHR spent fuel option
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
N et co nsumpt io nP u39: 90-95%T o ta l P u: 65-72%
Pu 239
Pu 240
Pu 241
Pu 242
Why do we need HTR?
Why do we need HTR?
� Specific assets of modular HTR� High temperature
� Beyond electricity generation, a large range of industrial process heat applications� Cogeneration application: a growing need of industry
� Flexibility� Modular concept: possibility to adapt more easily to the versatility of applications power needs� Cogeneration: even more fine tuning
� Mature technology� It can address in the short term the
reduction of CO2 emissions andenergy independence
⇒ HTR: most appropriate fission system to address energy needs of industry
� B
Cogeneration in Europe (EUROPROG, EUROSTAT)
Temperature (°C)
1600 1400 1200 800 600 400
Desalination, District Heating Urea Synthesis
Wood Pulp Manufacture De-sulfurization of Heavy Oil
Petroleum Refineries Town Gas
Ethylene (naphtha, ethane) Hydrogen (Steam Reforming)
Electricity Generation
Glass Manufacturing Cement Manufacturing
Iron Manufacturing
App
1000
Styrene (ethylbenzene)
Gasification of Coal
Reactor Temperature up to 850°C
Nuclear Heat
200
(with a Blast Furnace) (Direction Reduction Methods)
Application
(Gas Turbine)
Figure 1: Present heat intensive industrial processes
SFR, LFR, SCWR→→→→ 500°C
LWR, HWR →→→→ 250°C
HTR, →→→→ 800°C VHTR > 800°CMSR →→→→ 600°C
GFR
A very large industrial application: cogeneration of electricity and steam
07 - 2001SUT Utility Terminal550 t/h47 bar
2 ALSTOM 9FA+2x 240 MW + 250 MW ST
SembCorp CogenSingaporePulau Sakra24
11 - 2001Tioxide Chemical plant128 t/h
70 - 20 barGE LM 6000 PD DLE43 MW + 5 MW ST (1shaft)
EnersolCalais - FranceTioxide25
12 - 2001Condat Paper Mill190 t/h66 - 7 bar
2 GE LM 6000 PD DLE2 x 43 MW
Périgord EnergieCondat - FranceCondat26
01 - 2002Peugeot Car Factory100 t/h41 - 8 bar
GE LM 6000 PD DLE43 MW
CogethermSochaux - FrancePeugeot Sochaux27
04 - 2002PTT Oil Refinery70 t/h41 bar
ROLLS-ROYCE Coberra265613 MW
Petroleum Authority of ThailandRayong - ThailandPTT Rayong28
05 - 2002Solvay Chemical Plant70 t/h57 bar
GE LM 2500 PJ DLE21 MW
Elyo Cogeneración 2000Martorell - SpainSolvay Martorell29
07 - 2002Lyondell Chemical Plant120 t/h21 bar
GE LM 6000 PD DLE44 MWElectrabel NLRotterdam - NetherlandsAir Products30
10 - 2002Papeteries Etienne Paper Mill85 t/h
41 - 4.5 barGE LM 6000 PD DLE44 MW
SethelecArles - FranceArles Paper Mill31
11 - 2004Smurfit Paper Mill20 t/h15 bar
SIEMENS V94.3A400 MW - Single Shaft CCPP
Voghera EnergiaVoghera - ItalyVoghera CCCPP32
10-2005Stadtwerke Saarbrücken AG120 t/h
112-70 barLM6000PD44 MW
ElectrabelSaarbrücken GermanyRepoweringRomerbrücke
33
Lanxess rubber producer120 t/h50 MW ElectrabelBelgiumLanxessCogeneration
34
CommercialOperation
Heat ClientHeat
ProductionGas turbineClient - OwnerLocation - CountryProject name
An example of cogeneration system for an industrial platform
Syngas production
� Today
� A short term path
� A longer term path
CO+H2CO+H2C+H2OCoal chemistry
R&D
no CO 2 emission
HTR as heat sourceHTR as heat source
CO+H2CO+H2
H2OH2O
CO2 recycling R&D
HTR as heat sourceHTR as heat source
Clean coal power plant
O2
CO2
no CO 2 emission
CO+H2CO+H2C+O2+H2OCoal
gasification
CO2
Coal for heatingCoal for heating
C
Coal (for heating) + O 2
450°C850°C DécompositionH2SO4
H2
DécompositionHI
VaporisationHI
O2
Réaction deBunsen
SO2
ConcentrationH2SO4
H20
I2
I2 + SO2 + 2 H2O → H2SO4 + 2 HI[120 °C]
2 HI → H2 + I2[330 °C]
H2SO4↓
H2O + SO2 + ½ O2[850 °C]
450°C850°C DécompositionH2SO4
H2
DécompositionHI
VaporisationHI
O2
Réaction deBunsen
SO2
ConcentrationH2SO4
H20
I2
450°C850°C DécompositionH2SO4
H2
DécompositionHI
VaporisationHI
O2
Réaction deBunsen
SO2
ConcentrationH2SO4
H20
I2
I2 + SO2 + 2 H2O → H2SO4 + 2 HI[120 °C]
2 HI → H2 + I2[330 °C]
H2SO4↓
H2O + SO2 + ½ O2[850 °C]
Hydrogen production
Short term path for reduction of CO2 emissions
Long term path for reduction of CO2 emissions
Water electrolysisPresent production technologies
Methane Steam Reforming (SMR)
⇒ 100% CO2 freeCompetitive
Low efficiency (20-25%)⇒ 30% reduction of CO2 emission
CompetitiveVery high efficiency (> 70%)
Nuclear heat (VHTR)
+ nuclear electricity+ Steam electrolysis
+ Thermo-chemical processes
High efficiency (~ 45%)⇒ 100% CO2 free
Nuclear electricity Nuclear heat (HTR) + SMR (+ reduction of process temperature)
H
c
CO2 Sep. (152)
(131)
CO2
NG compressor
HDS(170)
(160)
H2 compressor
c
PSA(190)
H2
c cc
H
(151)
Heat Exchange Network (140)
Demi Water
Steam
Natural Gas
Post CombustionChamber (120)
Heat Exchanger (110)
Nuclear or Solar Energy
Air
Second Post Combustion
Chamber(137)
H2 Recycle
(12)
PSA purge
PSA Purge (11)
Natural Gas Make-up
H
H
(20)
(24)(25)
(14)
(13)
(132) (133)
Stack(180)
(134)
(135)
(136)
H
(23)
(22)
(21)
(26)
(11)
(19)
(10)
(15)(16)
(17)
(18)
H
c
CO2 Sep. (152)
(131)
CO2
NG compressor
HDS(170)
(160)
H2 compressor
c
PSA(190)
H2
c cc
H
(151)
Heat Exchange Network (140)
Demi Water
Steam
Natural Gas
Post CombustionChamber (120)
Heat Exchanger (110)
Nuclear or Solar Energy
Air
Second Post Combustion
Chamber(137)
H2 Recycle
(12)
PSA purge
PSA Purge (11)
Natural Gas Make-up
H
H
(20)
(24)(25)
(14)
(13)
(132) (133)
Stack(180)
(134)
(135)
(136)
H
(23)
(22)
(21)
(26)
(11)
(19)
(10)
(15)(16)
(17)
(18)
????Technical feasibility
Competitiveness
Membrane SMR
S-I process
High temperature electrolysis stack
module
The international context
REACTORVESSEL
INTERMEDIATE HEAT EXCHANGER (IHX)
MODULE FUELSTORAGE AREA
REACTOR CAVITYCOOLING SYSTEM(RCCS) TANKS
HEAT RECOVERYSTEAM GENERATOR(HRSG)
GENERATOR
L.P. TURBINE
CONDENSERH.P./I.P. TURBINE
COMPRESSOR
GAS TURBINE
MAINTRANSFORMER
RCCS HEADERSAND STANDPIPES
FUEL TRANSFERTUNNEL
SECONDARY GASISOLATION VALVES (TYPICAL)
SECONDARYGAS BYPASS
CONDENSERCOOLING WATER
Japan: HTTR test reactor, 30MWth, in operation since
1998
Korea: NHDD project
China: HTR-10, test reactor, 10MWth, in operation since
2000China: HTR-PM, industrial
prototype, 2x250 MWth, commissioning 2013
USA: NGNP, industrial prototype for CHP and hydroge n production, commissioning in 2021
Japan: GTTR 300, 600 MWth
France: ANTARES programme for a CHP
system, 600 MWth
Russia: GT-MHR project
South Africa: PBMR400 MWth, commissioning in 2014
Status of HTR development in the world
Status of HTR development in the world: recent trends
� “Generation IV International Forum (GIF)”: the VHTR is the system with the highest momentum, with already 3 Project Arrangements signed (fuel, hydrogen, materials)
� Emphasis of NGNP and PBMR on process heat applications
� Major US process heat user companies support NGNP
� Evolving design of PBMR
� China: digging the ground for HTR-PM foundations
E.U.
Plenary session “voice of the customer, Application of Process Heat from HTRs”
PBMR 2004: direct cycle for electricity generation
PBMR 2008: indirect cycle for CHP
What about Europe?
The assets of Europe: the legacy of past developments
� Europe built HTR up to the industrial prototype scale
� Europe developed the technology of components for industrial process heat applications
� Europe developed high quality fuel
THTR (FRG)1986 - 1989
AVR (FRG)1967 - 1988
DRAGON (U.K.)1963 - 76
EXPERIMENTAL REACTORS DEMONSTRATION OFBASIC HTR TECHNOLOGY
MODULAR CONCEPT
10 MW mock-up of a He-He
heat exchanger
10 MW steam reformer mock-up for nuclear application
The assets of Europe: the present situation
� The renaissance of HTR technology development in Europe� Materials qualified for HTR applications� Advanced technologies for heat exchangers developed� Fuel manufacturing technology
recovered
� EURATOM is involved in GIF VHTR projects
� The European industry is involved in the main international HTR projects (USA, South Africa and China), supplying technology and components
⇒ Europe is also ready to develop its own HTR: within 10 to 15 years there could be in Europe a HT R demonstrator supplying heat
to industrial processes
SE RRATED FINS
Before and after BRA ZING
0.8 à 2 .5 mm
3 .53 à 9.63 mm
M ODULE
PLATES/FINS Assembly
PFHE 1
SE RRATED FINS
Before and after BRA ZING
0.8 à 2 .5 mm
3 .53 à 9.63 mm
M ODULE
PLATES/FINS Assembly
PFHE 1
INLETAPERTURE
OUTLETAPERTURE
RINGRING
N2+He
He
Plates are brazed along seams Rings welded by
plasma
PFHE 2INLET
APERTURE
OUTLETAPERTURE
RINGRING
N2+He
He
Plates are brazed along seams Rings welded by
plasma
PFHE 2
Corrugated plate HXCorrugated plate HX
PMHE conceptPMHE conceptPMHE concept
(CEA Cadarache)UO2 kernel fabrication UO2 kernel coating
Plate heat exchanger conceptsHE-FUS3 helium loop(ENEA Brasimone)
What to do?
Need of a partnership with end-users
� A strategic alliance between reactor vendors and utilities allowed developing nuclear systems adapted to operators’ requirements
� For developing heat and co-generation HTRs for industrial process energy needs, a strategic alliance must be built with
� Industrial users of process heat
� Engineering companies supplying plants to process heat users
� Designers and operators of cogeneration plants for industry
� Such alliance is needed for
� Defining end user requirements on the nuclear heat source
� Adapting the industrial process applications to operation with a HTR
� Building this alliance is a challenge: even if increasing costs and CO2 reduction concerns are impacting industry, there remains still a cultural and economic gap
� Very different time scales for investment feedback in nuclear Vs non-nuclear industry
� Large investment often already made for minimising energy needs of the plants ⇒ possibility of resorting to a nuclear energy source only for new plants
� General reluctance to resort to nuclear energy (alleged risks, hostile public opinion…)
A proposed initial step for the developing a strategic alliance with process heat and
co-generation industrial users
� Proposal presented in the present call of Euratom 7th Framework Programme: EUROPAIRS = End-User Requirements for Process Heat Applications with Innovative Reactor for Sustainable Energy Supply
� Objectives� To develop a strategic alliance between nuclear and process heat and co-generation
user industries for developing a HTR demonstrator coupled with industrial processes
� To make jointly (with partners from nuclear, end-user and licensing organisations) an assessment of the feasibility of the coupling� Technical� Industrial� Economic� Licensing� Sustainability
⇒ Identification of the issues which require developments
⇒Roadmap for the development of a demonstrator
� If selected for funding, starting of the project beginning of 2009
EUROPAIRS partnership
• End-user industries• ArcelorMittal – France Steel making• Technip KTI – Italy • Prochem – Poland • Saipem – France/Italy• Utility Support Group B.V. (USG/DSM) – The Netherlan ds Chemistry + energy supply operator
• Energy supply operators (+ nuclear operator)• Fortum Power and Heat Oy – Finland• Suez – Belgium
• Nuclear industry • Amec-NNC – UK• Areva NP – France
• Technical Support Organisations of Nuclear Regulato ry Bodies• Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) – Germany• Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear S afety (IRSN) – France • TüV Nord – Germany
• Nuclear research• Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA) – France• Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (J RC)• ForschungsZentrum Jülich GmbH (FZJ) – Germany• Nexia Solutions Ltd – UK• Nuclear Research & consultancy Group (NRG) – The Net herlands
�The objective is to develop the end-user group
Oil engineering
Two Polish fertiliser companies interested in joining the partnership:ZAK and PUŁAWY
Next step: a project for the pre-conceptual design of a demonstrator
Proposed for being launched in 2009-2010, jointly between HTR-TN partners and non-nuclear industries
� Pre-conceptual design
� Selection of the main options of the reactor
� Selection of prototypic industrial process applications and of the main options for the selected process
� Definition of coupling schemes
� Design of the components of the reactor, of the coupling system and of the applications
� Licensing reference frame
� Support R&D
� Continuation of nuclear R&D (fuel, materials, component qualification, computer code qualification, waste management) + initiation of a few new topics (e.g. high temperature instrumentation)
� Development of application processes and possibly of heat transport technologies
� Search for a funding scheme and a partnership (European or international) for carrying out a demonstrator project
Conclusion
� There is a large potential for a breakthrough of HTR as CHP CO2 free plants for addressing industry energy needs
� A fast track for deployment of HTR, minimising development risks, is possible
� For a breakthrough of HTR in the CHP market to be possible, a strategic alliance with heat-user industries is necessary
� A political push is needed for inciting industry to look for such prospects, which cannot enter into the frame of “business as usual”
� The strategy proposed by HTR-TN is in line with
� The global strategy for energy R&D proposed by the EC for developing low carbon technologies (SET plan)
� The Strategic Research Agenda of SNE-TP