the pros and cons of nearshoring - rsm usrsmus.com/pdf/wc_pros_cons_nearshoring.pdfthe pros and cons...
TRANSCRIPT
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 1
The pros and cons of near-shoring
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
June 4, 2013
Welcome
We will address your questions at the end of the presentation.presentation.
To submit a question, select the Q&A window at the top of the screen. In the window that opens, type your question into the dialog box, and press the “Ask” button.
Please disable all webcams.
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Download a PDF copy of the slides by pressing the Handouts Button located on the tool bar at the top of your screen.
1
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 2
Awarding CPE
To receive CPE credit
• One person per computer
• Must stay connected for at least 50 minutes and answer each of the four (4) y ( )polling questions
• NASBA requires that we monitor your participation
• Your interactions will be tracked through the system
• Your audio and computer connections will be tracked through the system
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
2
Leading today’s discussion
Karen KurekPartner and National Industrial Products Industry Leader
Frank JiNational China Desk Leader
Edgar Lopezlena Director, Mexican Tax Practice
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
3
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 3
Today’s agenda
Perspectives on near-shoring China insights China insights
Considerations for Mexico
Q&A
Our presenters will answer audience questions at the end of the presentation. To submit a question, select
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
p q ,the Q&A button at the top of your screen.
4
Perspectives on near-shoring
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
5
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 4
What is Near-shoring and why is it so important to the U.S.?
Near-shoring
In-shoring
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
6
On-shoring
“Made in America” is making a comeback
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
7Source: Time Magazine
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 5
Factors that provide the underlying rationale for near-shoring as a supply chain strategy
Costs - Landed cost/Cost of Ownership. - Rising labor costs in emerging countries - Rising energy costs in emerging countries, decreasing energy costs
in the US
Increase in logistics costs (administrative, transportation and inventory)
Long lead times and the resultant impact on customer satisfaction and inventory
Rising and shifting consumer expectations/time to market
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Increase risk (natural disasters alone cost $300b in supply chain costs in 2012)
Importance of quality IP Protection
8
Why the optimism toward a manufacturing comeback?
Cheap U.S. natural gas and other
increased energy production are
helping to power U.S. factories more
Congressional approval in 2011 of
trade agreements with South Korea,
Colombia and Panama and other
efficiently, with gas especially
providing inexpensive raw materials
for U.S. manufacturers of plastics,
tires, certain pharmaceuticals and
other petrochemical products.
Higher wages in China and other
foreign export markets are making
agreements being negotiated now
with Asia and Europe are promising to
open more foreign markets to U.S.
products.
High U.S. unemployment is relieving
pressure on factory owners to
increase wages, helping to make U.S.
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
outsourcing less profitable to U.S.
firms.
labor costs more globally competitive.
Major technology advances have
steadily boosted factory efficiency and
worker productivity.
9Source: AP- April 4, 2013
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 6
Near-shoring vs. Off-shoring
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
10Source: Alix Partners Executives’ Perspectives on Manufacturing Near-Shoring
Near-shoring vs. Off-shoring
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
11Source: Alix Partners Executives’ Perspectives on Manufacturing Near-Shoring
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 7
Offshore supply chain procurement
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
43 percent say that foreign sourcing for their supply chain will increase in the coming 18 months .Nearly 60 percent say they are not going to increase foreign sourcing in next 12-18 months.
12Source: McGladrey Monitor- Fall 2011
Factors expected to drive jobs to the U.S.
A recent study posits that some 3 million jobs will return to the U.S. thanks to near-shoring.
Three factors expected to drive this process
The rising costs of production in China
The rising costs of transportation
The improved efficiency and productivity in the
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
13
p y p yU.S. and Europe
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 8
Today’s agenda
Perspectives on near-shoring
China insights China insights Considerations for Mexico
Q&A
Our presenters will answer audience questions at the end of the presentation. To submit a question, select
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
p q ,the Q&A button at the top of your screen.
14
The Current Trend
As the cost of doing business in China is increasing, many U.S. companies are moving g y p gsome of their export oriented manufacturing operations to other locations, such as Mexico and SE Asia.
However, most of the U.S. companies that are doing business in China are not leaving China completely because of the following reasons:- As China is changing to a consumer based economy from
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
As China is changing to a consumer based economy from an export orientated economy, it is becoming an ever more important market for U.S. companies.
- It is extremely difficult to dissolve a foreign investment enterprise (“FIE”).
15
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 9
Improved Purchasing Power
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
16
Overview of China’s law on Liquidation
Articles 181 to 191 of the Company Law of The People’s Republic of China (revised in 2005) govern the
fdissolution and liquidation of an enterprise. If a foreign investment enterprise fails to meet its
obligation and “walks away” without going through a proper liquidation, the PRC Government will seek prosecution for foreign executives and legal representative of the enterprise and impose heavy penalties (even jail sentences). The foreign executives concerned may also be permanently barred from entry
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
concerned may also be permanently barred from entry to China, thus affecting their future investment opportunities in China. In addition, the PRC Government may seek prosecution against the foreign executives in their own domicile.
17
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 10
Reasons for Liquidation
According to Art 181 of the Company Law, a company may be dissolved under the following circumstances:y g1. The business operation term expires and the occurrence of
other reasons for dissolution as prescribed in the company’s articles of association.
2. Shareholders pass a resolution to dissolve the company.
3. Dissolution as a result of merger or segregation of the company.
4. The company’s business license is cancelled by
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
government authorities or it is ordered to close down or to be dissolved according to the law.
5. The People’s Court decides to dissolve the company according to Art 183 of the Company Law.
18
Timelines
Dissolving a FIE is a lengthy process, which generally takes 6-9 months to complete but could take years.
General timelines for a liquidation proceeding:1. Relevant Government authorities should be notified within 7
days from the beginning of the liquidation.2. liquidation committee should be formed within 15 days from
the date of dissolution of the liquidating company to carry out the liquidation procedure.
3. After the liquidation committee is formed, the liquidation committee should notify the known creditors in writing within
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
y g10 days and place public announcement in a national newspaper within 60 days.
4. Creditors should declare their claims within 30 days from the receipt of the written notices or within 45 days from the issuance of the public announcement.
19
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 11
Timelines (Continued)
5. If an enterprise terminates its business operation during a tax year, the annual Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”) for the current tax period should be settled within 60 days from the date oftax period should be settled within 60 days from the date of the actual termination of the business operation.
6. Within 180 days upon the formation of the liquidation committee, the liquidation committee should write up a liquidation report and submit the same to the Board of Directors and relevant Government authorities for approval.
7. Deregistration with the original registration authorities (e.g. State Administration for Industry and Commerce, Customs Bureau and State Administration of Foreign Exchange, etc) should be applied within 30 days from the date of the
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
should be applied within 30 days from the date of the submission of the liquidation report.
8. The liquidated enterprise should file an enterprise liquidation income tax return and settle tax liabilities within 15 days from the date of the completion of the liquidation procedures.
20
Liquidation Audit
liquidation audits are generally required twice:i. When the termination application is submitted to the
authorities and the application approved by the government authorities;
ii. When all the termination procedures have been completed.
The liquidation audit procedures are similar to statutory audit procedures but with more emphasize on the following :- The financial performance of the company for the six months
before the date of declaring liquidation;
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
before the date of declaring liquidation;- The completeness and truthfulness of the information on
assets;- The liabilities of the company;- The liquidation expenses .
21
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 12
Major Issues for Tax Deregistration
1. Clearance of outstanding tax liabilities – All existing tax liabilities, such as Enterprise Incomeexisting tax liabilities, such as Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”), Value Added Tax (“VAT”), Business Tax (“BT”), Stamp Duties, should be settled.
2. New tax liabilities during liquidation - The liquidation itself may result new liabilities. For example, employee compensation will be subject to individual income tax and assets disposal will be
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
to individual income tax and assets disposal will be subject to turnover tax.
22
Severance
Employees’ salaries should be fully paid as at the end of the month preceding the announcement ofend of the month preceding the announcement of the liquidation. The employment contracts would indicate how long each employee has officially worked for the company and the compensation for termination of employment would be calculated based on the salary and length of employment. In general, an employee can receive a month of pay
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
(based on the average salary they earned during the current year of employment) for every year they have worked for the company
23
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 13
Other Government Agencies Involved
Government authorities Liquidation Process
Ministry of Commerce To deregister and terminate the Approval CertificateCertificate
SAIC To apply for business deregistration
SAFE To close all bank accounts
Customs Bureaus To apply for Customs deregistration
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China
To apply for deregistration of Unified Code
24
Today’s agenda
Perspectives on near-shoring
China insights China insights
Considerations for Mexico Q&A
Our presenters will answer audience questions at the end of the presentation. To submit a question, select
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
p q ,the Q&A button at the top of your screen.
25
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 14
Mexico At-a-glance
Size 1,200,000 sq mi
States 31 + Mexico City, D.F.
Geographic • US Border: 1,900 mig pBoundaries • Guatemala / Belize Border:
750 mi• Coastline: 6,000 mi
Official Language Spanish
Currency Mexican Peso (MXN)
Population • 110,000,000 people• Mexico City pop. 20,000,000• Majority of population live in Mexico City has the largest
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
26
urban areas
Economy • World’s 11th largest economy• GDP (2012): US$1.7 Trillion• GDP Per Capita (2012):
US$15,000• Considered a local power
(Latin America Area of Influence)
y gpopulation of U.S. expatriates in the world (600,000 est.)
Why Mexico?
Logistics- Geographic proximity to North American marketsGeographic proximity to North American markets
- First rate port / communications infrastructure
- Natural hub for growing Central and South American markets
- Hub for APEC and EU shipments (extensive shores on both oceans)
- Similarities in business practices between the U.S. and Mexico
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Mexico
27
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 15
Regulatory
100% foreign investment allowed (except certain specific sectors)specific sectors)
Minimum initial capital requirements
Cero foreign currency restrictions
Liability concerns not as heavy as in the U.S.
Government agencies familiar with U.S. investment
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
28
Tax
Competitive corporate tax rates: Flat 30% (No state taxes on income))
Attractive incentives for export operations (Maquiladoras)- Tax rate can be potentially reduced to approximately 17%- Exemption from VAT and import duties (in most cases)- Simplified transfer pricing compliance
Generous tax environment to repatriate excess cash
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
cash Comprehensive free trade agreements (NAFTA,
EU, APEC, South America) Comprehensive network of tax treaties
29
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 16
Labor
58 million people employed or employable
Competitive labor costs (Minimum wage averagesCompetitive labor costs (Minimum wage averages US$9.00 per day)
Well trained labor force
Some of the most recognized (and oldest) higher learning institutions in Latin America (UNAM – First university in the Americas – ca. 1551)
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
)
Hard working culture
Examples: Aerospace, high-end automotive manufacturing, medical equipment, chemical products
30
Economics
Robust economy – 11th largest economy in the world
Outperformed other economies during the 2008 crisisOutperformed other economies during the 2008 crisis
Stability – Economic indicators have been relatively stable (except during the 2008 – 2009 post-crisis period)
Low inflation
Strong middle class with strong purchasing power
U.S. – Mexico one of the largest trade partnerships in the
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
31
U.S. Mexico one of the largest trade partnerships in the world
U.S. investments into Mexico average US$10 Billion ever year
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 17
Inflation Rate
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
32
Trade Balance
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
33
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 18
U.S. – Mexico Trade Balance
Month Exports Imports Balance
January 2012 17,254.7 21,493.6 -4,238.9
February 2012 16,893.2 22,707.9 -5,814.7
Millions of U.S. Dollars
y , , ,
March 2012 18,954.9 25,094.2 -6,139.4
April 2012 17,293.0 22,740.4 -5,447.4
May 2012 18,528.8 24,877.2 -6,348.4
June 2012 17,548.9 23,483.7 -5,934.7
July 2012 17,550.9 22,539.2 -4,988.4
August 2012 19,168.8 23,688.3 -4,519.5
September 2012 17,450.6 22,213.0 -4,762.3
October 2012 20,458.2 24,818.0 -4,359.8
November 2012 18,828.4 23,692.4 -4,864.0
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
34
December 2012 16,400.6 20,304.9 -3,904.3
TOTAL 2012 216,330.9 277,652.7 -61,321.8
2012 : U.S. trade in goods with Mexico NOTE: All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars on a nominal basis, not seasonally adjusted unless otherwise specified. Details may not equal totals due to rounding.Source: www.census.org
Why Mexico?
And of course, great food!
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
35
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 19
Challenges in Mexico
Too much dependency on U.S. economy (“If the U.S. gets a cold, Mexico gets pneumonia”)a cold, Mexico gets pneumonia )
Red tape – Still too much paperwork and time consuming registration, formation processes. Uncertainty on how to do things, in some cases
Aggressive tax / social security audits
Overprotective labor laws – 10% of the Profits go to the
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
p gemployees!
Security – Has not affected investment significantly, but still an important factor
36
Initial Considerations
Investment vehicles• Branch?• Legal entity?• What type? • How many?• U.S. tax treatment?
Set up of Maquiladora (IMMEX) program – Ideal vehicle for export operations
Initial tax registrations and requirements Checklist
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Initial tax registrations and requirements – Checklist (Estimated time is fifteen business days)
Transfer pricing strategy Tax withholdings
37
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 20
Investment vehicles – How many entities?
Segregating different functions into separate legal entities can be a good planning strategy:
- Increase protection of valuable assets
- Facilitate sales into Mexico of Maquiladora products
Downside: Potential increase in Mexican tax liability / increased cost of administration
Separate entity for employees used to be an effective planning technique to save on PTU (*). New labor law rules eliminate this planning strategy (“Look-Through” provisions)
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
* PTU: a mandatory profit sharing payment to all employees. It is 10% of the employer’s net taxable income with no carry forward of NOLS allowed
eliminate this planning strategy ( Look Through provisions)
38
Maquiladora / IMMEX Program
Principal benefits:- Reduction or elimination of import dutiesReduction or elimination of import duties
- Expeditious customs paperwork when importing and exporting
- Expeditious refund of Value-Added tax recoverable balances
- Certain reductions in Mexican income taxes
- Simplified transfer pricing regulatory framework
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
- CAUTION: Heavily regulated and scrutinized
39
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 21
Myth Fact
Maquiladoras have to be located in the border with the U.S.
Maquiladoras can be located anywhere within Mexico where state laws allow
Maquiladoras have to ship product back to the U.S.
Maquiladoras can ship product to any country outside of Mexico
Maquiladoras cannot produce goods for local markets
Maquiladoras can produce goods for local markets, although certain tax implications may arise
I can keep books and records for my Maquiladora in my headquarters in the U.S.
Maquiladoras are required to maintain accounting and tax books and records in their location
I can transfer my Maquiladora (IMMEX) authorization
The Maquiladora (IMMEX) Program is non-transferable and can only be used by the Mexican legal entity that owns it
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Maquiladoras are simply an extension of my manufacturing operation (same entity concept)
Maquiladoras are entities independent of their owners. They serve as contract manufacturers to their owners and are expected to maintain an arm’s-length relationship with those owners
I have to pay Mexican taxes on the sale of products manufactured or assembled by my Maquiladora
If transfer pricing requirements are met, sales of products manufactured in Mexico will generally escape Mexican taxation
40
Final considerations
Be patient, things in Mexico do not h f t ld t ihappen as fast as you would expect in the U.S.
Always ask before acting; do not try to look at things as you would if you were setting up an operation in the U S
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
setting up an operation in the U.S.
Hire a good accountant and a good attorney in Mexico
41
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 22
Who to contact
Karen KurekChicago
312.634.3920 [email protected]
Frank JiSchaumburg, IL
847.413.6471 [email protected]
Edgar Lopezlena Schaumburg, IL
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
42
Thank you.
Thank you for joining us today!Thank you for joining us today!
Join McGladrey for these upcoming webcasts:
June 19: Strategies for growth: The 2013 Manufacturing & Distribution Monitor
June 20: Ireland Update: Considerations for US
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
companies.
Register today at McGladrey.com/Events
43
The pros and cons of near-shoringJune 4, 2013
McGladrey LLP 23
McGladrey LLP is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be addressed to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 150 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 700, Nashville, TN, 37219-2417 Website: www nasba org
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
2417. Website: www.nasba.org.
44
DisclaimerThe information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. McGladrey LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. McGladrey LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors
i th li ti f t l t th i ti l it ti
McGladrey LLP is the U.S. member of the RSM International (“RSMI”) network of independent accounting, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSMI collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities which cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party.
McGladrey, the McGladrey signature, The McGladrey Classic logo, The power of being understood, Power comes from being understood and
McGladrey LLP
888.811.1023 www.mcgladrey.com
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations.
Circular 230 DisclosureThis analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
p g , gExperience the power of being understood are trademarks of McGladrey LLP.
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.