the pulse april/may

24
THE PULSE THE NEWSLETTER OF THE ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY HOUSING OFFICERS APRIL & MAY 2015 IN THIS ISSUE President’s Welcome [4] RLC & FBM [6] Changing Student Housing Landscape [8] Assessment with Julie [13] OACUHO Research [22] and more! OACUHO 2015 SPRING CONFERENCE Rejuvenate - York University JUNE 8th - JUNE 11th

Upload: oacuho-pulse

Post on 22-Jul-2016

245 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Official Newsletter of the Ontario Association of College and University Housing Officers.

TRANSCRIPT

THE PULSETHE NEWSLETTER OF THE ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY HOUSING OFFICERS

APRIL & MAY 2015

IN THIS ISSUE

President’s Welcome [4] RLC & FBM [6]

Changing Student Housing Landscape [8] Assessment with Julie [13] OACUHO Research [22]

and more!OACUHO 2015 SPRING CONFERENCE

Rejuvenate - York University

JUNE 8th - JUNE 11th

Board of Directors

The Communications Committee

PRESIDENTLaura Storey | Carleton [email protected]

ura

PRESIDENT-ELECT / FINANCE DIRECTORJulie West | University of Guelph [email protected]

PAST PRESIDENTChad Nuttall | University of Toronto Mississauga [email protected]

COMMUNICATION DIRECTOR Brian Cunha | University of Waterloo [email protected]

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORMatthew Harris | York University [email protected]

MEMBERSHIP ENGAGEMENT DIRECTORBrian Ingoldsby | University of Guelph [email protected]

CONFERENCE DIRECTORBrittany Gawley | McMaster [email protected]

CORPORATE PARTNER RELATIONS DIRECTORColin Ryrie | Brock [email protected]

SENIOR-LEVEL MEMBER AT LARGEGlenn Matthews | Western [email protected]

MEMBER AT LARGESamantha Wiebe | University of Waterloo [email protected]

TH

E P

ULS

E DIRECTORBrian Cunha

CONTRIBUTORSDrew SimonHeather Lang

THE PULSE EDITORSVictoria GadonAlison KavanaghLyn-Marie FarleyKatie CalcaterraLaura Mammone

THE HISTORY PROJECTGlenn MatthewsMatt WaghornAndrew Quenneville

6rlc & fbm

7

11

OACUHO Research22

EDITOR Brian Cunha

OACUHO mentorship program

our place in the rapidly changing student housing landscape

assessment with julie westgoal setting 16

2 0OACUHO spotlight moment

Table of Contents

checkouts: an admissions perspective18

21

13

                 

  t’s   been   a   fantastic   year   .illed   with  change.   I,   for   one,   am   re.lecting   on   what   I’ve  learned  this  year  and  I’d  like  to  share  with  you  some   of   my   “nuggets”.   While   some   of   these  things   I   knew   before,   sometimes   it’s   great   to  have  them  reinforced  through  a  life  lesson.  

   

    A  decision  is  just  a  decision.  

That’s  right.  There  is  no  good  or  bad  decision.  When  you’re  trying  to  make  a  decision  to  take  a  new  job,  to  move,  to  take  on  that  new  project  –   there   is   no   good  or   bad  decision.   There   are  probably  good  and  bad   things   that  come  with  each  choice  regardless  of  the  decision.  I  moved  to  a  new  job  in  a  new  city  this  year.  There  have  been   so   many   great   things   about   this  decision…   and   also   some   really   hard   and   sad  parts  of  leaving  my  old  job  and  my  old  city.  

When  you’re  trying  to  make  a  decision  to  take  a  new  job,  to  move,  to  take  on  that  new  project  –  there  is  no  good  or  bad  decision.

- 4 -

I

President’s Message

1.“ “

Things I learned this year… by Laura

   

      It’s  okay  to  ask  for  help.  And  know  the  difference  between  desire  to  support  and  ability  to  support.  

I  de.initely  knew  this  before  this  year.  However,  as  I’ve  moved  forward  professionally  this  has   become  more   nuanced.  Who   do   I   ask   for   help   and  when?   Asking   for   help   requires  vulnerability   and   authenticity   and   I   am   careful   in   trying   not   to   burden   anyone   when  asking.   During   a   particularly   dif.icult   incident   on   campus,   I  was  more   than   three   hours  away.  Because  of  the  relationship  I  have  with  the  people  I  work  with  I  was  able  to  let  them  know   I   wouldn’t   be   back   on   campus   right   away   and   asked   if   they   could   manage   the  incident   in  my  absence.  My  desire   to  help  and  my  ability   to  help  were  not   congruent  at  that  time  –  and  admitting  that  to  the  team  allowed  for  those  involved  in  the  incident  to  get  the  support   they  needed.  A  great   team  will  know  that   there  will  be  differences  between  ability  and  desire.  

    What  keeps  you  busy?  

I’ve  tried  to  shift  my  focus  to  be  more  balanced  in  my  everyday  life  and  in  that  I’ve  tried  to  not  de.ine  myself  by  only  my  work.  In  that,  I’ve  stopped  asking  people  “what  do  you  do?”  and   started  asking   “what  keeps  you  busy?”.  The   former  often  prompts  a  work  or   school  response  while   the   latter   prompts   a   response   that   includes   a   lot   of   passion.   Sometimes  “what  keeps  you  busy”  has  the  person  telling  me  about  their  work  –  but  more  often  it  has  them  telling  me  about  an  art  project,  their  family,  a  book  they’re  reading  or  a  trip  they’ll  be  taking.  It’s  a  great  conversation  starter  that  doesn’t  come  with  assumptions.  

   

What   are   your   favourite   nuggets   from   this   year?   Tell   me   more   on   twitter   @oacuho  #lifelessons.  

   

- 5 -

President’s Message

Laura  StoreyOACUHO  President

2.

3.

- 6 -

Q:  Why   the   change   in   date   for   the   Residence  Life  Conference?A:  By  hos.ng   the  Residence   Life  Conference   in  November,   those   who   a=end   the   conference  will   be   able   to   op.mize   on   the   .me   following  the   conference   to   implement   and   share   the  knowledge  gained  at   the  conference.  With   two  rounds   of   proposal   applica.ons   for   student  delegates,   there   will   be   plenty   of   .me   to  prepare   and   prac.ce!   Furthermore,   by   having  the   conference   in   November   as   opposed   to  January   and   February,   it   doesn’t   overlap   as  much  with  typical  RLS  hiring  cycles.  

Q:  Why  the  decision  to  combine  the  FBM  and  RLC  and  host  at  McMaster  University? A:  Since  both  the  Fall  Business  Mee.ng  and  the  Residence   Life   Conference   are   happening   in  November  2015,   the  decision   to  host   both   the  same  weekend  at  the  same  loca.on  will  help  to  maximize   the   number   of   professional   and  student  delegates  that  can  a=end.  In  having  the  two   conferences   together,   it ’s   a   great  opportunity   to   bring   student   staff   and  professional   delegates   together   whi le  promo.ng  OACUHO  to  student  staff.

With   the   exci.ng   change   in   date   to   the   Residence   Life   Conference   and   the   collabora.on  taking   place   between   McMaster   University   and   Carleton   University’s   Fall   Business   Mee.ng,   we  thought  we  would  take  the  opportunity  to  answer  some  of  the  frequently  asked  ques.ons  we  have  been  receiving!

Melissa  Pratt  &  Drew  Simon     McMaster  University

Sara  Wills  &  Natalie  Allan   Carleton  University

RLC & FBM

- 7 -

Q:  Will  there  sCll  be  two  themes? A:   Yes!   Carleton’s   theme   is   Capitalizing   on  Collabora.on   and  McMaster’s   theme   is   Follow  your   Curiosity.   You’ll   no.ce   that   both   of   our  logos   of   the  maple   leaf   and   the   light   bulb   are  .ed   to   one   another   in   design   but   con.nue   to  represent  each  of  our  themes. Q:  Will   there  be  an  opportunity  on  the  day  of  Friday   November   13th   for   student   staff   who  come  early  with  professional  delegates?  

A:   Yes,   we   are   currently   working   together   to  develop   a   pre-­‐conference   opportunity   for  student   staff   who   are   traveling   on   the   Friday  morning   to   a=end   pre-­‐conference   sessions   in  the   aWernoon.   This   may   include   social   and  learning  ac.vi.es  as  well  as   the  opportunity  of  to  connect  with  professional  staff.  This  year  the  Business  Mee.ng   por.on   of   the   conference   is  being   held   on   Friday   AWernoon   as   opposed   to  the   morning.   We   are   changing   the   tradi.onal  schedule   to   accommodate   those   professionals  who   wish   to   a=end   the   FBM   in   combina.on  with  the  Residence  Life  Conference  and  cannot  

make   it   in   the  morning.  This   is   currently   in   the  ini.al   planning   stages   and   we   would   love   to  have  your   input  on  what  can  be  done   to  make  this   an   amazing   and   valuable   experience   for  student   staff   in   our   pre-­‐assessment   survey:  h=ps://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FBM2015 Q:  Will  there  be  a  reduced  or  packaged  cost  for  those   who   register   for   both   the   Fall   Business  MeeCng  and  the  Residence  Life  Conference? A:  We  are  currently  working  out  pricing  for  the  Fall   Business   Mee.ng   and   Residence   Life  Conference   registra.on.   Based   on   the   needs  assessment   response,   we   will   be   providing  addi.onal  informa.on. We   encourage   you   to   visit   our   websites   for  more   informa.on   as  we   get   closer   to   the   date  at:   h=p://rlc2015.mcmaster.ca/   and   h=p://cua[bm2015.com/.  We   look   forward   to   seeing  you   all   November   13-­‐15,   2015   for   the   Fall  Business   Mee.ng   and   the   Residence   Life  Conference!  

- 8 -

    e've   seen   tremendous   growth   in   off-­‐

    campus   housing   construc.on   in  Waterloo   over   the   past   decade.   Derek   Lobo,   a   real  estate   professional   who   started   working   with  companies   interested   in   the   student   housing   market  more   than   25   years   ago,   says   that  more   than   10,000  purpose-­‐built  beds  have  been  constructed  in  Waterloo  in   a   li=le   over   a   decade.     By   comparison,   that   is   as  much  growth  as  has  taken  place  in  the  rest  of  Canada  over  the  same  .me  frame.    This  results  in  Waterloo  students  having  more  choice  in  where   they   live   than   anywhere   else   in   the   country.  Those   of   us   working   in   UW   Housing   are   trying   to  understand   what   this   means   for   us.   In   my   role   as  Director   of   Housing   at   UWaterloo   one   of   my   biggest  responsibili.es   is   to   provide   leadership.   To   do   that  effec.vely  I  need  to  know  where  I’m  leading  my  group,  a   challenge   made   more   complex   by   the   rapidly  changing  landscape.

To   help   me   understand   how   our   local   market   is  evolving   I've   spent   some   .me   looking   at   how   the  student   housing  market   has   developed   in   the   United  States.  The  sheer  size  of  the  popula.on  and  the  higher  educa.on  industry,  along  with  the  crea.ve  spirit  of  the  culture,   oWen   means   business   opportuni.es   are  explored  earlier  there  then  they  are  in  Canada.  In  early  April   I   a=ended   the   7th   annual   Interface   Student  Housing   conference   in   Texas.   This   gathering   a=racts  companies   from   all   parts   of   the   (student)   housing  market,   including   investors,   developers,   real   estate  professionals,   lenders,   property   managers,   builders,  and  marketers  among  others.  

Our place in the rapidly changing student housing landscape

Glen  WepplerDirector,  Housing  &  ResidencesUniversity  of  Waterloo  

W

- 9 -

Nearly   1,000   people   registered   for   the   conference,  which   is   comparable   in   size   to   ACUHO-­‐I's   annual  conference.  The   sessions   I   a=ended  covered  a  variety  of   topics   including:   current   and   future   state   of   the  student   housing   market,   current   and   future  construc.on   projects,   trends   in   design,   management  and  opera.ons,  informa.on  technology  infrastructure,  future  of  social  media,  public-­‐private-­‐partnerships  and  town-­‐gown-­‐property   rela.onships.   It ’s   worth  highligh.ng   that  while  all  of   these   topics  are   relevant  to  campus  housing,  none  of  them  focus  on  a  student’s  learning  and  development,  which  we  know  to  be  a  key  component  of  student  success. The  conference  was  a  valuable  experience  for  me  and  I  wouldn't   hesitate   to   recommend   it   to   my   peers   and  leaders  in  campus  housing.  The  lessons  learned  for  me  included:   •   The   student   housing   market   con.nues   to   grow  steadily   if  not   rela.vely   fast  when  compared   to  other  types  of  investments.  Purpose  built  (for-­‐profit)  student  housing   is   now   as   large   as   on-­‐campus   housing   in   the  United  States.  This  growth  has  largely  happened  inside  of  the  last  two  decades. •   Several   companies   now   have   a   good   handle   on  what's   involved   in   opera.ng   a   student   housing  property  and  some  have  billions   (with  a   'b')  of  dollars  in  assets.   •   Proximity   to   a   campus   was   iden.fied   as   a   very  important  factor  in  the  success  of  a  property.  •   Differen.a.ng   one   property   from   other   proper.es  was  an  outcome  commonly  desired   yet   it  was   readily  acknowledged  that  it  is  hard  to  achieve.    

•  A  common  incen.ve/marke.ng  tac.c  shared  was  to  provide   giW   cards   to   encourage   students   to   sign   a  lease.  One  example  shared  saw  a  property  spend  well  over  $100,000  on  giW  cards.   •   The   high   end   of   the   market   in   the   United   States  appears  to  be  saturated  (which  appears  to  be  the  case  in  Waterloo  as  well).   •  Considerable   effort   is   put   into  marke.ng  proper.es  a n d   t h e   a p p ro a c h e s   t a ke n   a r e   e vo l v i n g  constantly.   Social   media   is   a   key   component   of   the  marke.ng  efforts.   •  A  heavy  focus  was  placed  on  metrics  in  each  session  –  no  ma=er  the  topic.   As   I   reflect   on   this   conference   experience,   I   not   only  remain  op.mis.c  about  the  future  of  campus  housing,  but   some   of   my   beliefs   have   been   strengthened.  Foremost   among   those   is   that   our   student's   learning  and   development   is   a   core   part   of   our   work,   which  aligns   perfectly   with   the   reason's   a   student   a=ends  university   in   the   first   place.   That   said,   we   must  con.nue   to   seek   out   ways   to   deepen   our  understanding  of  how  living  on-­‐campus  contributes  to  learning.  Furthermore,  we  must  tell  our  students,  their  parents  and  our  partners  across  campus  the  value  that  residence   adds   to   our   student's   experience.     The  contribu.ons   we  make   to   our   student’s   learning   and  development   is   what   makes   us   dis.nct   from   other  types  of  student  housing.    

- 11 -

        w a l k i n g   t h r o u g h           campus  with  trees  and           flowers  star.ng  to  bud           –   the   magnolia   and  cherry   blossoms   are   already   in   full   bloom.   Isn’t   that  invigora.ng   to   step  out  of   your  office  on  a   sunny  day  and  take  a  stroll  on  your   lunch?  Don’t  you  feel   revitalized   as   you   sit   outside   on   a  bench   with   your   colleagues   with   your  coffee?   If   you’ve   been   nodding   along   and  smiling   then   you   know   exactly   what   I  mean,   and   you’re   going   to   love   what   I’m  going  to  say  next…‘Tis  conference  season!!   Don’t   you   feel   rejuvenated   just   by   that  thought  alone?!  While   the   days   grow   longer,   the   .me   is  quickly  disappearing  as  we  look  forward  to  the   2015   OACUHO   Annual   Spr ing  Conference.     Each   spring,   Housing   and  Residence   Life   professionals   from   across  Ontario,   along   with   professionals   from  some   out-­‐of-­‐province   Colleges   and  Universi.es,  gather   to  discuss  and  present  

on  trends  in  student  housing  and  showcase  new  ideas  and   products   that   further   advance   innova.on   in   the  field. York   University   is   very   proud   and   excited   to   host   the  conference   next   month   and   have   been   an.cipa.ng  

that   aWer   a   long   year,   taking   a   bit   of   .me  for   yourself   and   some   PD   is   exactly   what  the   doctor   (read:   manager)   ordered.   The  Host   Commi=ee   was   inten.onal   in  selec.ng   the   conference’s   theme   to   be  “Rejuvenate”.   Rejuvena.on   is   a   process   of  renewal,   for   individuals,   for   facili.es,   for  prac.ces   and   for   ideas.   Considering   how  we   care   for   ourselves   is   essen.al   to   best  enable   the   proper   care   of   others.   To  rejuvenate  can  look  very  different  from  one  person,  or  from  one  place,  to  the  next  –  we  believe   exploring   and   highligh.ng   this  process  will  be  helpful   to   individuals,   their  prac.ces  and  their  campuses  as  they  move  into  the  future.  

Tammy  Douglas   Residence  Life  CoordinatorYork  University   [email protected]    

Rejuvenation  is  a  process  of  renewal,  for  individuals,  for  facilities,  for  practices  and  for  ideas.

Ahh,

“  ”

- 12 -

As   proposals   were   reviewed,   the   need   and   want   for  re juvena.on   on   your   campus,   within   your  departments,   and  within   your   prac.ces   became   clear  to   us.   There   are   so   many   incredible   ini.a.ves   being  undertaken   right   now   within   our   colleges   and  universi.es,  within  Housing,  Facili.es,  Admissions  and  Residence   Life.   Where   there   was   need   for   change,  you’ve   been   looking   for   posi.ve   and   prac.cal  solu.ons.   Where   there   has   been   progress   made,  you’ve   documented   your   steps   and   are   ready   to  present  best  prac.ces  to  your  colleagues.  Where  there  have  been  new  and  invigora.ng  ideas,  you’re  ready  to  share   your   success.   We   too,   as   the   Host   Commi=ee,  have   been   rejuvena.ng   how   such   programs   are  reviewed  and  accepted  to  present  at  OACUHO’s  Spring  Conference.   A   difference   in   the   process   this   year  was  the   crea.on   of   the   program   review   commi=ee   –  OACUHO   members   were   sent   an   email   inquiring   of  their   interest   in   reviewing   program   proposals   and  we  had   an   overwhelmingly   posi.ve   response.   Each  interested  member   reviewed   1-­‐2   programs  with   each  proposal  being  reviewed  by  two  separate  people.  This  is  a  change  from  previous  conferences  where  the  Host  Commi=ee   reviewed   all   proposals.   By   involving   the  membership   on   this   level,   the   reviewers   could   gain  some   insight   as   to   what   sessions   are   being   offered.  Addi.onally,  those  who  reviewed  had  the  opportunity  to   look   at   a   proposal   and   think,   “maybe   I’ll   put  something  together  next  year”.   York  has  also  refreshed  the  medium  of  the  conference  program.   AWer   much   research   and   discussion,   we’ve  secured   the   services   of   an   App   provider,   EventMobi.  The   building   of   the   app   to   suit   the   needs   of   the  conference   is   currently   in   full   swing.   Get   your  smartphones  ready  and  engage,  stay  organized  and  

plot   out   what   sessions   you’ll   a=end   on   a   whole   new  level!   Not   to   worry   if   you’re   not   smartphone  compa.ble  -­‐  there  will  be  a  small  offering  of  programs  for   such   a   purpose   as   to   make   your   conference  experience  tailored  to  you. As   all   the   pieces   come   together   to   make   this  conference  happen,  we  are  very  pleased  to  be  able  to  announce   the  opportunity   to  have  Dr.  Carney  Strange  as  our  Faculty  in  Residence  throughout  the  conference.  Not  only  will  he  be  giving  a  Keynote  address,  but  he’ll  be   leading  a  Pre-­‐Conference  workshop   (I   see   some  of  you   have   already   jumped   on   that   boat)   as   well   as   a  mid-­‐week   session.   If   you,   like   me,   were   at   CACUSS  2013   in   Montreal,   you   may   have   had   the   chance   to  a=end   a   session  with  Dr.   Strange   and  hear   him   teach  through  the  strumming  of  his  guitar.  He  has  served  as  a  mentor   to   many   in   the   field   of   Student   Services   and  has   co-­‐authored/edited   several   books,   many   with   a  focus  on  Higher  Educa.on  in  Canada.   These  are  simply  a  few  of  the  developments  I  can  share  at  this  moment.  York  University’s  Host  Commi=ee  has  been   eagerly   planning   and   awai.ng   your   arrival   at  OACUHO’s  Spring  Conference,  an  opportunity  we  have  been   so   happy   to   have   been   given   for   this   year.   We  want  to  showcase  what  makes  our  York  community  so  vibrant,   as   well   as,   provide   social   opportuni.es   that  encompass   just   a   small   sampling  of  what  Toronto  has  to  offer.  We  hope  you  come  away  from  this  conference  teeming   with   possibili.es   for   the   upcoming   year.  Engage,  learn  and  rejuvenate!For   more   informa.on   please   look   to   the   website:  h=p://rejuvenate2015.info.yorku.ca/    

Off on the Right Foot

- 13 -

  he   Free   Dic.onary   (by   Farlex)   defines     assessment  broadly  as  “the  act  of       assessing  or   appraisal”   –   it   can  be  used  in   educa.on,   banking   and   finance   and   many  other  areas.     Assessment   is   a   concept   that   ins.lls   fear   in  some   people.     It   oWen   treated   as   an   aWer-­‐thought,   but   in   reality   without   it,   you   can’t  determine  your  progress  or  success.   How  can  I  do  assessment?Let’s   address   the   fear   factor   first   –   you   don’t  need   a   degree   in   sta.s.cs   to   be   successful   in  assessment. For   instance,   you   can   contract  with   an   outside  source   that   specializes   in   assessments.    Educa.onal   Benchmarking   (EBI   –   now   called  Skyfactor)  and  Campus  Labs  are   two  examples.      Skyfactor   is   a   great   resource   to   do   some  assessments   and   the  beauty  of   par.cipa.ng   in  their   surveys   is:   a)   you   don’t   need   a   stats  background   to   analyze   the   results   and;   b)   you  

can   see   how   you   measure   up   against   other  schools  that  are  similar  to  yours.    They  provide  a  great   interface   that   allows   you   to   view   the  overall   sta.s.cs,   compare   groups   and  determine  priori.es  for  ac.on.  This  kind  of  data  allows   you   to   ‘toot   your   own   horn’   at   your  ins.tu.on   and   provides   performance   feedback  that   may   help   you   nego.ate   be=er   service  agreements  with  university  service  partners.  

A   less   costly  method  may  be   to   engage  with  an  academic  partner.    Link  up  with  faculty  or  graduate  students  who  may  be   looking  for  a  research   opportunity.     In   some   cases   a   local  senior  undergraduate  or   graduate   student  may  have   a   project   where   they   are   required   to   do  some   research.   It’s   a   great  way   to   bridge  with  faculty   and   gets   some   great   assessment   or  research   done   at   a   reasonable   price   (oWen  nothing)   and   a   wonderful   opportunity   for  collabora.on   and   academic   engagement   with  residence.  

Alterna.vely,  you  can  do  it  yourself.    Just  be   aware   of   the   limita.ons   of   your   skill,   .me  and  cost  constraints.  

Julie  West Coordinator,  Research  &  Special  ProjectsUniversity  of  [email protected]    

Assessment

T

Who  uses  assessment?Everyone!     If   you‘re   not   doing   it   and   using   it,  how  can  you  set  goals  and  chart  your  progress  toward  them? In   ResLife,   assessment   is   oWen   used   to  determine  if  learning  has  taken  place.    You  may  use   it   in   training,   programs,   and   structured  conversa.ons.     For   classroom  assessment,   just  google   Classroom   Assessment   Techniques   –  there  is  a  wealth  of  info  online.    One  example  is  that   last   year,   I   did   a   training   session   for   our  ResLife  staff  on  ‘who  are  our  students’.    I  began  with  about  5  learning  outcomes  and  ended  the  session  with  a   re-­‐cap  of   the  outcomes  phrased  as  ques.ons  and  polled  the  group  for  answers.    I   received   an   instant   indica.on   of   whether   or  not  they  took  in  the  informa.on  I  provided. In   the   facili.es   area,   you  may   be   interested   in  building   condi.on,   and   assessment   may   be   in  the   form   of   an   engineering   report,   lifecycle  analysis,  energy  use,  etc.   In  such  circumstances  it  may  more  typically  be  called  an  audit.    These  types  of  assessments  provide  informa.on  useful  in  the  development  of  capital  renewal  plans  and  budgets.   Assessing   students   sa.sfac.on   with  services   provided   can   also   be   useful   in  determining   changes   in   opera.ons   or  procedures. Assessment   undertaking   by   the   admissions  group   can   provide   useful   informa.on   for  occupancy  management,   such   as   the   ability   of  students  to  obtain  their  first  choice  of  residence  accommoda.ons,   or   in   determining   why  students   leave   the   residence   system.   The   EBI  offered   a   sec.on   on   Room   Assignment   and  Change   that   may   provide   some   informa.on  about   how   sa.sfied   students   are   with   their  assignment  or  their  ability  to  move.

In   the   IT   world,   assessment   measures   can  provide  informa.on  on  how  do  students  define  a   successful   wireless   network   deployment   and  what   characteris.cs   are   most   important   to  them.    We  asked,  and  our  students  said  speed,  coverage,   reliability,   were   3   of   their   top   5  indicators.  In  looking  at  these  factors,  there  are  many   ways   to   assess   the   network:   perhaps   a  wireless  site  survey   to  give  you  some  objec.ve  data  on  coverage,  capacity  and  other  quality  of  service  metrics.    Perhaps  a  use  and  sa.sfac.on  survey  to  determine  how  students  want   to  use  the   network   and   their   sa.sfac.on   with   their  ability  to  perform  various  tasks  on  the  network. And   how   about   off-­‐campus   housing   –   do   you  know   what   the   most   popular   type   of   housing  your   students   are   in?     Purpose   built   student  housing,   accessory   apartments   in   houses,  homestay? In   the   end,   assessment   is   central   to   evidence  based,  data  driven  decision  making. Where  to  get  data? Sources  of  data  oWen  freely  exist;  you  just  need  to  know  what  you  need  and  where  to  look. Internally,   check   to   see   if   your  department  has  par.cipated   in   the   EBI   survey.     In   2014,  more  than   20   Canadian   ins.tu.ons   took   part   in   the  EBI  Resident  Sa.sfac.on  Survey.    What  did  your  department   learn?     How   did   you   compare   to  your  comparator  groups?    What  goals  were  set?    How  have  you  measured  progress  or  success  on  those  goals? You   can   also   check   your   ins.tu.onal   research  department   (aka   Analysis   &   Planning).     They  oWen  collect  data  from  students  that  can  prove  helpful.     You   can   typically   find   data   on  enrolment   forecas.ng   and   large   scale   surveys  that   take   place   on   campus   (Na.onal   Survey   of  

- 14 -

Student   Engagement   –   aka   NSSE,   Canadian  University  Survey  Consor.um  aka  CUSC).    They  would   also   be   the   ones   who   would   look   at  reten.on   and   persistence   data   and   you   could  ask   them   to   compare   your   residence   students  with  those  off  campus.    Or  are  there  differences  in  the  various  styles  of  your  residences.    Check  with  your  campus  health  service  to  determine  if  your  campus  par.cipated  in  the  2013  edi.on  of  the  Na.onal  College  Health  Assessment   survey  (with   30+   Canadian   ins.tu.ons   par.cipa.ng).  Our  interna.onal  student  office  recently  invited  us   to   a   presenta.on   of   the   Interna.onal  Student  Barometer.    While  there  weren’t  many  items   pertaining   to   residence,   those   that   did  provide  some  great  context  on  a  topic  we  were  concerned  about. Externally,  when  we  were  looking  at  whether  or  not   to  build  a  new  residence,  Sta.s.cs  Canada  and  the  Ontario  Ministry  of  Finance  (and  lots  of  other   reports)   provided   us   with   projec.ons   of  popula.on  growth  that  helped  us  to  determine  what   our   ‘share’   of   tradi.onal   post-­‐secondary  students  might  be. Now  what? What   ques.ons   do   you   have?     What   data   do  you   already   have?     What   do   you   need   to  collect?     How  might   you   collect   it?   And   what  will  you  do  with  it? If   you   are   in   Res   Life,   your   ques.on  might   be:  are   your   students   learning?     What   are   your  learning   goals   for   students?     How   can   you  measure   them?     How   many   students  successfully  meet  those  learning  goals? If   you   are   in   admissions,   how   many   students  request   transfers   each   year   and  what   are   their  reasons,   are   there   any   themes   that   your  office  can   address;   or   anything   for   another   part   of  your  department  (i.e.,  a  par.cularly  noisy  areas,  

or  building  repairs  that  are  stalled  or  perhaps  a  drug   concern).     Are   there   any   policies   or  procedures   that   need   adjustment   to   be=er  inform  students  of  their  op.ons? If   you   are   in   facili.es,   are   your   laundry  machines  deemed  ‘ineffec.ve’  by  students?    Put  up   a   poster   in   the   laundry   room   teaching  students  how  to  do  laundry  (No,  5  pair  of  jeans  in   one   load   probably   won’t   dry   in   one   cycle).    Then  find  a  way  to  test  them.    ‘Have  they  seen  the   poster?   Have   they   read   it?   Do   they   follow  the  advice? For  those  students  living  off  campus,  where  are  they   in   the   community?     Has   there   been   a  migra.on   from   one   area   of   the   community   to  another?    What  impact  has  that  had? Finally,   tell   your   story   (especially   if   you   can  a=ach  numbers).    You  might  find  that  you  have  a   12%   recidivism   rate   for   students   that   go  through   our   alcohol   educa.on   seminar,   but   a  35%  recidivism  rate  for  students  that  get  a  fine.    When  it  comes  to  cleanliness  of  the  washrooms,  82%   of   your   students   indicate   that   they   are  sa.sfied   or   very   sa.sfied.       From   admissions,  38%   of   your   students   may   indicate   that   they  received   their   first   choice   of   residence   and  nearly  70%  received  their  first  or  second  choice.    To  connect  to  the  wireless  network,  85%  of  your  students   might   indicate   that   they   were   either  sa.sfied   or   very   sa.sfied   with   the   ease   of  connec.on.    And  the  older  neighbourhood  near  the   campus   has   reduced   the   student  concentra.on  by  40%  in  the  past  5  years. Be  sure  to  share  with  OACUHO  your  assessment  challenges,  successes,  ques.ons.    The  more  we  can  talk  about  it,  the  be=er  resource  we  are  to  each  other. Assessment  in  The  Free  Dic/onary  by  Farlex.    Retrieved  on  April   27,   2015   hAp://www.thefreedic/onary.com/assessment  

- 15 -

- 16 -

“Goals  help  us  focus  our  energy  and  ac.ons,  measure  our   progress   and,   ul.mately,   achieve   purposeful  results.  “  –Ontario  Ins.tute  for  Educa.onal  Leadership    

I  like  goals.  Even  more,  I  love  the  development  that   occurs   through   the   achievement   of   goals.   There  are  .meless  goal  sexng  strategies  that  can  be  found  at  your   finger.ps   using   Google   search   such   as   Locke   &  Latham’s   Goal   Sexng   Theory   (clarity,   challenge,  complexity,   commitment,   and   feedback)   or   Doran’s  S.M.A.R.T   goals   (specific,   measurable,   a=ainable,  realis.c,   and   .mely).   As   professionals   in   the   housing  industry,   I  believe  our  collec.ve  knowledge   in   regards  to   these   strategies   is   extensive.     However,   I   am   not  here  to  address  the  ‘what’  behind  goal  sexng.  Rather,  I  am  choosing  to  begin  with  the  ‘why’.      

Beginning   as   early   as   the   1960’s,   Locke’s  pioneering  work  established  the  rela.onship  between  clear   goals,   appropriate   feedback,   and   employee  mo.va.on  (Locke  and  Latham,  2002).  We  see  how  this  determina.on   has   carried   over   into   a   variety   of  professional  work  environments   through  performance  appraisals,   professional   development   employee  programs,  and  work  incen.ves.  It  is  interes.ng  to  note  how   goal   sexng   remains   the   underlying   explana.on  for  all  major  theories  of  fostering  work  mo.va.on  and  engagement   (see   Vroom’s   VIE   theory,   Maslow   or  Herzberg’s   mo.va.on   theories,   Bandura’s   social  cogni.ve   theory,   or   Skinner ’s   operant   based  behaviourism  to  name  a  few!).  If  you  are  interested  in  learning  more  about  the  benefits  of  goal  sexng,  there  are   an   extensive   number   of   studies   (Echols,   2005;  Erikson,  2004;  Knight  et  al.,  2001;  Mathieson,  2006;  

Tasker,   2004)   that   have   discussed   effec.ve   goal  sexng’s   posi.ve   impact   on   outcomes   within  organiza.ons.  This  is  just  the  .p  of  the  iceberg  in  terms  of   the   vast   amount  of   knowledge   that   is   immediately  available  to  us   in  regards  to  the  proven  advantages  of  goal  sexng.    

To  elaborate  on  one  specific  study,   the  results  from   an   experiment   conducted   by   Medlin   (2009),  demonstrate   that   goal   sexng   directly   and   posi.vely  impacts   employee   engagement   (coefficient   of   +0.58).  Employee  engagement  directly   and  posi.vely   impacts  workplace   op.mism   (coefficient   of   +0.65)   and   that  workplace   op.mism,   in   turn,   directly   and   posi.vely  impacts   individual   performance   (coefficient   of   +0.77).  Therefore,   in   transferring   this   knowledge   to   the  workplace  it  translates  to:

In  short,  goal  sexng  is  important  and  it  works.  

Goal SettingLaura  Mammone   Residence  Life  Area  CoordinatorWilfrid  Laurier  University

GOAL SETTING

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

WORKPLACE OPTIMISM

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE

- 17 -

Next,  I  will  focus  on  the  future  of  ‘how’.  One  thing  that  I   chose   to   emphasize   this   year   with  my   student   staff  team   was   goal   sexng   (who   would   have   guessed!).   I  began  an  experiment  of  my  own  through  beginning  the  year   by   conduc.ng   an   informa.onal   interview   with  each   of  my   staff  members.     I   wanted   to   learn   about  what   passions   they   had,   the   strengths   they   felt   they  already   possessed,   where   they   wanted   to   grow,   and  what   they   hoped   to   accomplish   throughout   the   year.  From  there,  I  worked  collabora.vely  with  each  of  them  to  create  somewhat  of  an  individual  learning  plan.  We  included   both   the   goals,   ac.on   plans,   and   resources  that  they  would  need  to  accomplish  their  goals.  In   order   to   keep   these   goals   at   the   forefront   of   their  minds,   we   measured   their   progress   throughout   four  phases  during  the  year.  By  having  the  goals  in  wri.ng,  at  the  end  of  the  year  they  were  able  to  see  how  much  they   really  did   accomplish  and   to  also   reflect  on  how  they   had   grown   as   leaders.   This   made   it   extremely  rewarding   for  both  myself  and   for   the   staff  members.    One  example  of   the  successes  of   this  occurred  with  a  staff  member  who  was  interested  in  student  discipline.  Using  myself  as  a  resource,  I  discussed  the  behavioural  sanc.oning   process   and   objec.ves   of   disciplinary  mee.ngs.  We  then  worked  towards  the  final  goal  and  this   student  was   successfully   able   to   conduct   a   lower  level   disciplinary  mee.ng.    My   personal   observa.ons  at   the   end   were   that   students   seemed   much   more  sa.sfied   with   their   staffing   experience.   Addi.onally,  through   them   being   challenged,   they   ended   up  achieving   more   than   they   would   have   without   these  goals  and  also   resulted   in   them  gaining  a  higher   level  of  self-­‐efficacy  through  their  accomplishments.    To   summarize,   I   challenge   us   all   to   begin   thinking  outside  the  box  to  determine  in  what  other  ways  goal-­‐sexng   might   be   applied   to   our   work   environments.  Perhaps   as   a   collabora.ve   team   encourager?   What  about  to  increase  the  performance  of  student  leaders?  Is   it  possible  to  align  our  efforts   in  assessment  results  with  substan.al  goal-­‐sexng  prac.ces? Whatever   might   resonate   with   you,   it   might   be  S.M.A.R.T   to   reserve   some   .me   during   the   summer  months  to  strategize  on  how  to  incorporate  more  goal-­‐sexng  into  your  prac.ce!  

“Goal   sexng   has   yet   to   become   personal,   real,   and  compelling   for   us   in   our   daily   lives   in   schools.   As   a  result,  we  are  missing  one  of  the  most  powerful  tools  for  helping  students  achieve.  The   loss   to  adults   is   just  as   profound.   We   are   missing   the   opportuni.es   to  experience  empowerment,  efficacy,  and  ..joy  in  work.”  –Conzemius  and  O’Neill  2006References Conzemius,  A.  &  O’Neill,  J.  (2001).  Building  shared  responsibility  for  student  learning.  Alexandria:  Associa/on  for  Supervision  and  Curriculum  Development.  Echols,  M.E.  (2005),  “Engaging  employees  to  impact  performance”,  Human  Capital,  February,  pp.  44-­‐8. Erickson,  B.   (2004),   “Nature  /mes  nurture:  how  organiza/ons  can  op/mize   their   people’s   contribu/ons”,   Journal   of   Organiza/onal  Excellence,  Vol.  24  No.  1,  pp.  21-­‐30. Locke,  E.  &  Latham,  G.  (2002).  Building  a  prac/cally  useful  theory  of  goal   se`ng   and   task   mo/va/on:   A   35   year   Odyssey.   American  Psychologist,  57  (9),  705-­‐717. Mathieson,   M.   (2006),   “Improving   organiza/onal   performance  through  developing  our  people”,   Industrial  &  Commercial  Training,  Vol.  38  No.  2,  pp.  70-­‐7.Knight,  D.,  Durham,  C.C.  and  Locke,  E.   (2001),  “The  rela/onship  of  team   goals,   incen/ves,   and   efficacy   to   strategic   risk,   tac/cal  implementa/on,   and   performance”,   Academy   of   Management  Journal,  Vol.  44  No.  2,  pp.  326-­‐38. Locke,  E.  et  al   (1981)  Goal  Se`ng  and  Task  Performance:  1969   to  1980.  Psychological  Bule/n,  Vol.    90,  No.  1,  pp  125  –  152Lunenburg,   F.   (2011).   Goal   Se`ng   Theory   of   Mo/va/on.  Interna/onal   Journal   of   Management,   Business,   and  Administra/on.  15  (1),  1-­‐6.   Medlin,  B.  &  Green,  K.  W.   (2009)  Enhancing  Performance   through  Goal   Se`ng,  Engagement,  and  Op/mism.   Industrial  Management  &  Data  Systems,  Vol.  109,  No.  7,  pp  943  –  956. Ontario   Ins/tute   for   Educa/onal   Leadership   (2014).   Se`ng  Goals:  The  Power  of  Purpose.     Ideas  Into  Ac/on.  Ontario:  Queen’s  Printer  for  Ontario. Tasker,   J.   (2004),   “Engagement   equals   produc/vity”,   Personnel  Today,  October  5,  pp.  8-­‐9.  

- 18 -

t  was  April  2013,  and  as  the  student       staff  member  scheduled  for  a  checkout     shiW,  I  came  prepared  with  my       clipboard,  checkout  form  and  pen.   Akin   to   any   other   checkout   at  Western,   I   began   to   make   my   way  through   the   checkout   mo.ons:   the  washroom   fixtures   were   intact,   the  student’s   bedroom   was   leW   in   a  cleanly   manner,   and   the   common  area   of   the   room   was   clear   of  damage.  Alas,  I  reached  the  last  step  of   the   checkout   form,   a   signature  from  the  student.  As  I  leaned  against  the  wall,   I   felt   a   poster   slightly   give  way.   Slowly,   I   ran   my   hand   behind  the  poster  and  found  that  there  was  a   sizeable   hole   hidden   carefully  behind   it.  Upon   further   inspec.on   I  found   similar   holes   behind   a   few  other  posters  in  the  room.   Checkouts   on   the   front   lines   can   be   complex,  and   filled   with   surprises   as   illustrated   above.  However,  we  some.mes  pay  li=le  mind  to  the  

complexi.es   of   checkout   processes   at   our    respec.ve   ins.tu.ons   and   the  esprit   de   corps  between  func.onal  areas  of  Housing  programs.  

Recently  I  had  the  opportunity  to  sit  down  with  Ruta  Lawrence,  Assistant  Director  of  Residence  Admissions  at  Western  University,   to   gain   a   be=er  understanding  of  checkouts  from  an  admissions  perspec.ve.   Ruta   explained   that   the   checkout  process   at   Western   has   changed  significantly  during  her  .me  with  the  admiss ions   team.   Or ig ina l l y,  checkouts   were   largely   handled  building-­‐to-­‐building  where  the  Front  Desk   teams   would   process   paper  work   and   apply   respec.ve   charges.  T h i s   p r o c e s s   w a s   . m e l y ,  

decentralized,   and   resulted   in   inconsistencies.  Ruta  shared  two  words  to  describe  the  changes  she   has   seen   over   the   course   of   her   career,  streamlining  and  automa.on.    

Ruta  shared  two  words  to  describe  the  changes  she  has  seen  over  the  course  of  her  career,  streamlining  and  automation.  

Andrew  QuennevilleResidence  Manager Western  [email protected]    

Checkouts: An Admissions Perspective

I

Following   the   checkout   process,   two   members   of  Western’s  Front  Desk  team  receive  the  paper  forms  from   the   nine   residences   at   Western   and  immediately   begin   to   input   damage   charges.   Ruta  explained   that   these   charges   are   documented   by  two  sources:   student   staff  members  and  members  of  Western’s  Facili.es  Management   team.  Focus   is  placed   on   combining   this   informa.on,   making  sense   of   differences   and   conver.ng   informa.on  into   an   electronic   format.   ThereaWer,   her   team  endeavours   to   invoice   students   for   damages   as  quickly   as   possible.   Ruta   commented   on   the  .meliness  of  this  process  as  being  important  to  her  team,   as   it   can   be   challenging   for   students   to  connect   an   invoice   with   a   damage   that   occurred  months  earlier.   I  asked  Ruta  to  share  some  of  the  challenges  faced  by  her  team  over  the  course  of  her  career  and  how  they  have  gone  about  remedying  these  challenges.    

Ruta  explained  that  her  team  has  been   inten.onal  about   elimina.ng   the   challenge   of   students  checking   out   of   residence   and   accidentally  removing   elements   of   the   room   that   belonged   to  the   University.   For   example,   students   at   Western  were   provided   with   ethernet   cables   before   the  switch   to   a   wireless   internet   service.   OWen,  students  would  mistakenly   pack   these   cables  with  them  at  the  .me  of  their  departure  from  residence.  Ruta   laughed  while   recalling   that   her   team  would  oWen   receive   parcels   containing   these   cables   and  other  items  accidentally  removed  from  rooms. Another  challenge  Ruta   iden.fied  was  the  year-­‐to-­‐year   assessment   of   the   threshold   for   charging  students  for  damages.  She  gave  the  example  of  a  

residence  room  with  four  students  and  the  difficult  decision  of  whether  or  not  to  assign  the  students  in  the  room  a  shared  damage  fee  of  $30.  While  these  costs  add  up,  Ruta  recognized  that  a  balance  needs  to   be   struck   between   charging   students   for  damages  and  the  .me  spent  assigning,  billing,  and  reconciling  these  damages.  Ruta   concluded   with   placing   emphasis   on  checkouts   being   a   year-­‐long   process.   She   shared  that  when  students  move   in   to   residence   they  are  encouraged  to  fill  out  the  Residence  Inventory   Condi.ons   Checklist,  which   allows   them  to   iden.fy   any   pre-­‐exis.ng   damages   in   their  residence   room.   ThereaWer,   Residence   Staff   at  Western   encourage   their   communi.es   in   an  ongoing  manner   to   take   care   of   themselves,   each  other  and  this  place.  This   take  care  mo=o  drives  a  culture   of   community   and   caring,   that   results   in   a  great  track  record  of  minimal  damages  at  the  close  of  the  academic  year  and  reduces  the  workload  on  Ruta’s   team.  Ruta   spoke  with  pride,  and  closed  by  commen.ng   on   the   success   achieved   by   students  taking  care  of  their  community,  and  the  excitement  gained   by   working   with   student   staff   and   young  professionals  year-­‐to-­‐year. So  what  will  the  future  of  checkouts  look  like?  Ruta  remarked   about   the   importance   of   cri.cally  reviewing   the   process   each   year   and   making   the  call  of  when  to  assess  damage  charges  as  a  source  of  consistent  change  for  her  team.  As  the  checkout  process   for   2015   is   about   to   begin,   Ruta’s   team   is  just  beginning  to  flip  over  their  next  poster!  

- 19 -

This  month’s  Spotlight  Moment  recognizes  Lindsay  Winger,   from   the   University   of   Guelph,  for  her  work  in  suppor.ng  her  staff: “As  Guelph’s  Ac/ng  Associate  Director  (AD)   of   Residence   Life,   Lindsay  Winger   has   done   a   fantas/c   job   of  suppor/ng   Guelph's   Residence  Life   Management   Team   this   year   –  truly  going  above  and  beyond.  Taking  on   the   AD   role,   while   s/ll   managing  responsibili/es   of   the   Community  Standards   Officer   posi/on,   has   been  no   small   task.   However,   Lindsay   has  managed   it   all   with   a   smile   on   her   face,  maintaining   her   commitment   to   each   student’s  success  and  experience  in  residence.  

Whether   she   is   “on-­‐call”   or   not,   Lindsay   will  regularly   aAend   difficult   residence   situa/ons   to  ensure  the  staff  feel  supported.  Plus,  she  always  makes  sure  to  make  /me  for  her  team,  even  if  it  

means  losing  some  for  herself. Lindsay’s   on-­‐going   effort   and   the  support   and   mentorsh ip   she  provides   certainly   make   her   worthy  of  the  “Spotlight”.  Thanks  for  all  you  do  Lindsay!”On   behalf   of   the   membership   and  

engagement  commi=ee,  congratula.ons  Lindsay  on  gexng  recognized  for  all  the  work  you  do  in  suppor.ng  your  staff!  

Spotlightmoment

- 20 -

As   the   year   comes   to   a   close,   the   commiNee   would   like   to   thank   all   of   those   who   submiNed  nominaCons  and  contributed  “Spotlight  Moments”  this  year.  We  would  also  like  to  recognize  all  of  the  staff,  across  all  funcConal  areas  in  OACUHO,  for  the  work  that  gets  put  in  daily,  in  supporCng  staff   and   students   and   contribuCng   to   the   overall   missions   of   student   development   and   staff  support.  It  takes  a  strong  level  of  commitment  to  stay  engaged  and  driven  throughout  an  academic  year.  #OAKUDOS  to  all.    

For   the   2014-­‐15   program,   we   were   able   to  facilitate   31   mentorship   pairings,   involving   58  professionals   from   22   ins.tu.ons   within  OACUHO.     Now   as   we   prepare   to   launch   this  year’s  program,  we  are  excited  to  announce  we  are  accep.ng  mentor  and  mentee  applica.ons!Launched  in  2007  at  the  OACUHO  Annual  Spring  Conference   at   the   University   of   Toronto  Mississauga,   the   OACUHO  Mentorship   Program  aims   to   foster   meaningful   professional  rela.onships   by   matching   an   experienced  housing   professional   (min.   3   years   experience;  “Mentor”)   with   newer   professional   (“Mentee”)  looking  to  advance  their  knowledge  and/or  skills  in  a  specific  func.onal  area  in  Housing.  The  OACUHO  Mentorship  Program  aims  to:•  Cul.vate  rela.onships  among  members  of  the  Associa.on   by   promo.ng   life-­‐long   learning  through  personal  and  professional  development•  Facilitate  opportuni.es   to  network  within   the  Associa.on•  Engage  with  professionals  in  various  func.onal  areas   in   Housing,   and   from   various   ins.tu.ons  within  the  Associa.on  

•   Increase   reten.on   of   Housing   professionals  through   support   from  experienced  peers   in   the  field. Program   par.cipants   regularly   connect   –  approximately   1   hour   per   monthly   minimum   –  to   develop   and   work   on   professional   and  personal   goals.     This   is   a   great   way   to   engage  and   learn   from   other   members   within   the  Associa.on  on  a  deeper  level.      More   informa.on   is   available   on   the   OACUHO  website:   h=p://oacuho.com/index.php?sec.on=overview-­‐mentor       Applica.onMENTOR:  h=p://goo.gl/forms/qpfGVwHx1c       MENTEE:  h=p://goo.gl/forms/nQTK4KUps5   Our  hope  is  to  have  some  applicants  paired  with  a   mentor/mentee   in   May,   to   allow   the   chance  for   them   to   connect   in   person   at   the   Spring  Conference   at   York  University.    We  will   also   be  accep.ng   applica.ons   on   a   rolling   basis   in   the  summer/year,   making   pairs   as   appropriate  matches  become  available.  If   you   have   any   ques.ons   or   concerns,   please  c o n t a c t   A n d r e w   Q u e n n e v i l l e  ([email protected]).     Looking   forward  to   a   great   year   ahead   for   our   mentors   and  mentees!  

OACUHO Mentorship Program 2015-16: Applications are open!

- 21 -

- 22 -

It’s Never Okay: Ontario Releases Action Plan to Curb Sexual Violence

  ast  month,   Ontario   announced   a   groundbreaking   and       wide-­‐ranging  ini.a.ve  to  curb  sexual  violence  and         harassment  in  the  province.  Called  It’s  Never  Okay:  An       Ac.on    Plan   to   Stop   Sexual   Violence   and   Harassment  [source:   h=ps://www.ontario.ca/document/ac.on-­‐plan-­‐stop-­‐sexual-­‐violence-­‐and-­‐harassment],   the   plan   was   announced   by   Ontario  Premier  Kathleen  Wynne  and  encompasses  a   three-­‐year,  $41  million  mul.-­‐pronged  approach  that   includes  a  mul.media  public  educa.on  campaign,   stronger   workplace   safety   legisla.on,   and   an   enhanced  prosecu.on   model.   Addi.onally,   the   province   commi=ed   increased,  stabilized   funding   for   survivor   support   and   proposed   legisla.on   to  eliminate  the  two-­‐year  limita.on  period  for  civil  sexual  assault  claims,  as  reported  in  Academica.

OACUHO Research

with  Trevor  CorkumOACUHO  Research  Writer    

L

- 23 -

Importantly,   according   to   Academica,   the  province   also   says   it   will   introduce  legisla.on   to   require   all   postsecondary  ins.tu.ons  to  adopt  a  sexual  assault  policy,  developed   with   input   from   students;   to  have   clearly   stated   complaint   procedures  and   response   protocols;   and   to   report  publically  on   incidence  of  sexual  assault  as  well   as   the   effec.veness   of   campaigns  against  sexual  violence. The  plan  is  blunt  and  direct  in  its  language:“We   want   to   eliminate   rape   culture   on  campus.  We  want   school   environments   to  be   safe   and   respec[ul.   We   want   every  student,   in   every   university   and   college   in  Ontario,   to  be  able   to   learn  and  study  and  experience   campus   life   at   its   finest,   free  from   sexual   violence   and   harassment…Ontario’s   campuses   should   be   safe   for  everyone.” The   plan   has   been   widely   praised   by  university  and  college   leaders.  For  Colleges  Ontario   President   Linda   Franklin,   “this   is   a  priority   for   every   college   in   the   province.”  The   Council   of   Ontario   Universi.es,  meanwhile,  said  that  “they  are  encouraged  by   Premier   Wynne’s   ac.ons”,   and   that  “universi.es   will   con.nue   to   do   our   part,  and  step  up  our  efforts  where  we  could  do  more.”  Earlier  this  year,  Ontario’s  publically-­‐funded  universi.es   unanimously   agreed   to   a  number   of   ini.a.ves   [source:   h=p://academica.ca/top-­‐ten/ontario-­‐universi.es-­‐unanimously-­‐agree-­‐ini.a.ves-­‐address-­‐sexual-­‐violence]  to  curb  sexual  violence  on  

campus,   including   the   crea.on   of   a  reference   group   to   discuss   best   prac.ces  for   addressing   on-­‐campus   sexual   assault  and   working   with   Ontario’s   colleges   to  discuss  and  combat  the  issue. The  report  comes  in  the  wake  of  a  number  of   high-­‐profile   cases   of   sexual   assault   and  harassment   on   university   and   college  campuses  across  Canada.  Many  universi.es  and  colleges   in  Ontario  have   responded   to  the   wider   issue   of   sexual   violence   by  conduc.ng   their   own   research   or   crea.ng  or   upda.ng   protocols   for   handling   sexual  assault. At   Wilfrid   Laurier   University,   for   example,  researchers   released   a   report   last   month  [source:   h=p://www.wlu.ca/media/news-­‐releases/march-­‐2015/study-­‐by-­‐laurier-­‐researchers-­‐into-­‐gendered-­‐violence-­‐on-­‐campus-­‐shapes-­‐university-­‐efforts-­‐to-­‐change-­‐culture-­‐and-­‐improve-­‐services.html]  looking   at   gendered   violence   on   campus.  Called   The   Change   Project,   the   research  involved   a   survey   of   570   students   and  interviews   with   51   students,   faculty  members,   and   community   partners.  According   to   Academica,   the   goal   of   the  report   was   to   build   a   solid   founda.on   of  evidence  that  would  allow  the  university  to  build   strategies   to   address   gendered  violence  and   improve  preven.on  programs  and   support   services   for   providers.  Recommenda.ons   include   developing   a  sustainable  bystander  program,  focusing  on  men  and  masculinity,  and  delivering  broad-­‐based   and   targeted   educa.on   and  awareness  campaigns.  

Ontario Association of College and University Housing Officers312 Oakwood Crt, Newmarket Ontario, L3Y 3C8 Telephone: 905-954-0102 Fax: 905-895-1630