the rate of progress of evolution - simons institute for the ...nicholas pippenger the rate of...

76
The Rate of Progress of Evolution Nicholas Pippenger 20 March 2014 Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Upload: others

Post on 24-Aug-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Nicholas Pippenger

20 March 2014

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 2: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Progress—Goals

I There will be goals.

I But they will not be imputed to nature.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 3: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Progress—Goals

I There will be goals.

I But they will not be imputed to nature.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 4: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Progress—Goals

I There will be goals.

I But they will not be imputed to nature.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 5: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 6: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 7: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 8: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 9: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 10: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

My Goals (for this talk)

I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of “rates”.

I But “progress” might not be proportional to time.

I Presently, functional forms.

I But don’t lump all power laws together as “polynomial”.

I Emphasize negative results.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 11: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

“The Cost of Natural Selection”

I J. B. S. Haldane, J. Genetics,1957.

I About 10—300 generations per substitution.

I J. Maynard Smith, Nature, 1968.

I Truncation.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 12: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

“The Cost of Natural Selection”

I J. B. S. Haldane, J. Genetics,1957.

I About 10—300 generations per substitution.

I J. Maynard Smith, Nature, 1968.

I Truncation.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 13: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

“The Cost of Natural Selection”

I J. B. S. Haldane, J. Genetics,1957.

I About 10—300 generations per substitution.

I J. Maynard Smith, Nature, 1968.

I Truncation.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 14: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

“The Cost of Natural Selection”

I J. B. S. Haldane, J. Genetics,1957.

I About 10—300 generations per substitution.

I J. Maynard Smith, Nature, 1968.

I Truncation.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 15: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

“The Cost of Natural Selection”

I J. B. S. Haldane, J. Genetics,1957.

I About 10—300 generations per substitution.

I J. Maynard Smith, Nature, 1968.

I Truncation.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 16: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 17: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 18: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 19: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 20: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 21: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 22: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 23: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 24: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 25: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 26: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Assumptions

I Fix n alleles (initially present in moderate amounts).

I Haploid genome.

I No mutation.

I Non-overlapping generations.

I Sexual reproduction.

I No assortative mating.

I No linkage in recombination.

I Fecundity unaffected.

I Omniscience as to genome.

I Omnipotence as to opportunity for reproduction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 27: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Basic Step

I Choose a threshold.

I Truncate population to individuals above threshold.

I Let population regain its original size.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 28: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Basic Step

I Choose a threshold.

I Truncate population to individuals above threshold.

I Let population regain its original size.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 29: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Basic Step

I Choose a threshold.

I Truncate population to individuals above threshold.

I Let population regain its original size.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 30: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Basic Step

I Choose a threshold.

I Truncate population to individuals above threshold.

I Let population regain its original size.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 31: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Basic Step

I Choose a threshold.

I Truncate population to individuals above threshold.

I Let population regain its original size.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 32: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Conclusions

I Iteration of the basic step is essentially optimal.

I #generations ≥ C√

n.

I This is (a lower bound for) the true “cost of naturalselection”.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 33: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Conclusions

I Iteration of the basic step is essentially optimal.

I #generations ≥ C√

n.

I This is (a lower bound for) the true “cost of naturalselection”.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 34: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Conclusions

I Iteration of the basic step is essentially optimal.

I #generations ≥ C√

n.

I This is (a lower bound for) the true “cost of naturalselection”.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 35: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Conclusions

I Iteration of the basic step is essentially optimal.

I #generations ≥ C√

n.

I This is (a lower bound for) the true “cost of naturalselection”.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 36: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

What If There’s No Sex?

I #generations ≥ C n.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 37: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

What If There’s No Sex?

I #generations ≥ C n.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 38: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Evolution As a Random Walk

I S. J. Gould, Full House, 1996.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 39: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Evolution As a Random Walk

I S. J. Gould, Full House, 1996.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 40: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk on a Line

• •p

oo1−p

// •

I p = 1/2.

I At time T , most walkers are to the left of C√

T .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 41: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk on a Line

• •p

oo1−p

// •

I p = 1/2.

I At time T , most walkers are to the left of C√

T .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 42: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk on a Line

• •p

oo1−p

// •

I p = 1/2.

I At time T , most walkers are to the left of C√

T .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 43: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk on a Line

• •p

oo1−p

// •

I p = 1/2.

I At time T , most walkers are to the left of C√

T .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 44: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Objection

I Sensitive to parameter: p = 1/2.

I If p < 1/2, populations sweeps to right.

I If p > 1/2, distribution approaches exponential.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 45: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Objection

I Sensitive to parameter: p = 1/2.

I If p < 1/2, populations sweeps to right.

I If p > 1/2, distribution approaches exponential.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 46: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Objection

I Sensitive to parameter: p = 1/2.

I If p < 1/2, populations sweeps to right.

I If p > 1/2, distribution approaches exponential.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 47: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Objection

I Sensitive to parameter: p = 1/2.

I If p < 1/2, populations sweeps to right.

I If p > 1/2, distribution approaches exponential.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 48: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Create a random environment.

I Take a random walk in that environment.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 49: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Create a random environment.

I Take a random walk in that environment.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 50: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Create a random environment.

I Take a random walk in that environment.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 51: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Environment

I An infinite tree, created by a branching process.

I Pr[two children] = a, Pr[no children] = 1− a.

I Condition on non-extinction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 52: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Environment

I An infinite tree, created by a branching process.

I Pr[two children] = a, Pr[no children] = 1− a.

I Condition on non-extinction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 53: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Environment

I An infinite tree, created by a branching process.

I Pr[two children] = a, Pr[no children] = 1− a.

I Condition on non-extinction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 54: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Environment

I An infinite tree, created by a branching process.

I Pr[two children] = a, Pr[no children] = 1− a.

I Condition on non-extinction.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 55: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

◦ ◦

• •

ppppppppppppp

NNNNNNNNNNNNN

◦ ◦

1− a a

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 56: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Walk

I Pr[ascend] = p.

I At a leaf, Pr[stay] = 1− p.

I At a binary node, Pr[descend left] = Pr[descend right] = 1−p2 .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 57: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Walk

I Pr[ascend] = p.

I At a leaf, Pr[stay] = 1− p.

I At a binary node, Pr[descend left] = Pr[descend right] = 1−p2 .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 58: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Walk

I Pr[ascend] = p.

I At a leaf, Pr[stay] = 1− p.

I At a binary node, Pr[descend left] = Pr[descend right] = 1−p2 .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 59: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Walk

I Pr[ascend] = p.

I At a leaf, Pr[stay] = 1− p.

I At a binary node, Pr[descend left] = Pr[descend right] = 1−p2 .

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 60: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

The Random Walk

◦ ◦

p

OO

1−p

ZZ •

p

OO

1−p2

xxqqqqqqq1−p2

&&MMMMMMM

◦ ◦

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 61: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Gould: a = 1.

I H. Kesten, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, 1986.

I a = 1/2, p = 1/3.

I At time T , most walkers are above level C T 1/3.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 62: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Gould: a = 1.

I H. Kesten, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, 1986.

I a = 1/2, p = 1/3.

I At time T , most walkers are above level C T 1/3.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 63: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Gould: a = 1.

I H. Kesten, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, 1986.

I a = 1/2, p = 1/3.

I At time T , most walkers are above level C T 1/3.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 64: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Gould: a = 1.

I H. Kesten, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, 1986.

I a = 1/2, p = 1/3.

I At time T , most walkers are above level C T 1/3.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 65: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

A Random Walk in a Random Environment

I Gould: a = 1.

I H. Kesten, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, 1986.

I a = 1/2, p = 1/3.

I At time T , most walkers are above level C T 1/3.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 66: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping

I Traps are entered with fixed probability 1/2 at each level.

I Time to escape a random trap is finite with probability one.

I But its expectation is infinite.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 67: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping

I Traps are entered with fixed probability 1/2 at each level.

I Time to escape a random trap is finite with probability one.

I But its expectation is infinite.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 68: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping

I Traps are entered with fixed probability 1/2 at each level.

I Time to escape a random trap is finite with probability one.

I But its expectation is infinite.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 69: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping

I Traps are entered with fixed probability 1/2 at each level.

I Time to escape a random trap is finite with probability one.

I But its expectation is infinite.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 70: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping

I Traps are entered with fixed probability 1/2 at each level.

I Time to escape a random trap is finite with probability one.

I But its expectation is infinite.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 71: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping occurs if 1/2 < a < 1 and 0 < p < (1− a)/(2− a).

1/2 • •

1/3 •

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

p

0 • •

1/2 a 1

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 72: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Trapping occurs if 1/2 < a < 1 and 0 < p < (1− a)/(2− a).

1/2 • •

1/3 •

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

p

0 • •

1/2 a 1

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 73: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

At time T , most walkers are above level C T θ, where

θ ≤log 1

1−a

log 14p

.

I Trapping is different from diffusion against a wall.

I Trapping is exacerbated by positive bias.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 74: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

At time T , most walkers are above level C T θ, where

θ ≤log 1

1−a

log 14p

.

I Trapping is different from diffusion against a wall.

I Trapping is exacerbated by positive bias.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 75: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

At time T , most walkers are above level C T θ, where

θ ≤log 1

1−a

log 14p

.

I Trapping is different from diffusion against a wall.

I Trapping is exacerbated by positive bias.

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution

Page 76: The Rate of Progress of Evolution - Simons Institute for the ...Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution My Goals (for this talk) I Ultimately, quantitative estimates of

Thank You

Nicholas Pippenger The Rate of Progress of Evolution