the report of student performance on the north carolina tests of

Repor ting on the Classes of 2008-2012

Published January 2009

Public Schools of North CarolinaState Board of EducationDepartment of Public InstructionAccountability Ser vices/Test Development SectionRaleigh NC 27601-2825www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing

2007-08 Report of

Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education is that every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life in the 21st Century. HOWARD N. LEE Chairman :: Chapel Hill WAYNE MCDEVITT Vice Chair :: Asheville WALTER DALTON Lieutenant Governor :: Rutherfordton JANET COWELL State Treasurer :: Raleigh

KATHY A. TAFT Greenville KEVIN D. HOWELL Raleigh SHIRLEY E. HARRIS Troy EULADA P. WATT Charlotte

ROBERT “TOM” SPEED Boone MELISSA E. BARTLETT Statesville JOHN A. TATE III Charlotte PATRICIA N. WILLOUGHBY Raleigh

NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION June St. Clair Atkinson, Ed.D., State Superintendent 301 N. Wilmington Street :: Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825 In compliance with federal law, NC Public Schools administers all state-operated educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of race, religion, national or ethnic origin, color, age, military service, disability, or gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law.

Inquiries or complaints regarding discrimination issues should be directed to: Dr. Rebecca Garland, Chief Academic Officer :: Academic Services and Instructional Support 6368 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6368 :: Telephone: (919) 807-3200 :: Fax: (919) 807-4065

Visit us on the Web:: www.ncpublicschools.org M0109

Report of Student Performance

on the

North Carolina Computer Skills

Proficiency Standard

2007-08

Published January 2009

Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Accountability Services/Test Development Section Raleigh NC 27601-2825 www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing

This publication and the information contained within must not be used for personal or financial gain. North Carolina LEA school officials and teachers, parents, and students may download and duplicate this publication for instructional and educational purposes only. Others may not duplicate this publication without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI), Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section. © 2009 All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced by any means, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Division of Accountability Services, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825.

Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard, 2007-08

Summary of

Report of Student Performance on the

North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard

Background

• In May 1991, the State Board of Education, under Feature C of the Quality Assurance Program, initially established a computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000 and beyond. In October of 1995, the Board modified the requirement by making it effective beginning with the graduating Class of 2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year and beyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma.

As declared in State Board of Education policy HSP-N-004 (16 NCAC 6D.0503), effective with the class entering ninth grade for the first time in the 2000-01 school year, students with disabilities in grades 9-12 may follow the North Carolina Occupational Course of Study (OCS) to fulfill requirements for a North Carolina high school diploma. These students must demonstrate computer proficiency “as specified in the IEP” in order to meet the computer skills proficiency graduation requirement.

• The first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiency requirement arises during eighth grade. Passing the computer skills standard for Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) is defined as passing both the multiple-choice and performance portions of the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills. Passing the computer skills standard for Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) is defined as passing the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills, or for eligible students, passing the North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment.

• The Class of 2008 completed the eighth grade at the end of the 2003-04 school year, the Class of 2009 at the end of 2004-05, the Class of 2010 at the end of 2005-06, the Class of 2011 at the end of 2006-07, and the Class of 2012 at the end of 2007-08.

Findings for Eighth Grade

(Class of 2012)

• For the 2007-08 school year, 82.0 percent of students statewide met the requirement by the end of grade eight.

• There were differences in performance among subgroups at grade eight. The Black (70.1%), Hispanic (71.1%), and American Indian (72.5%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Multi-Racial (85.5%), Asian (88.2%), and White (90.0%) subgroups.


Findings for Ninth Grade

(Class of 2011)

• For the 2007-08 school year, 80.7 percent of students statewide met the requirement by the end of grade nine.

• There were differences in performance among subgroups at grade nine. The Hispanic (68.3%), Black (70.4%), and American Indian (74.9%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (79.6%), Multi-Racial (82.5%), and White (88.9%) subgroups.

Findings for Tenth Grade

(Class of 2010)

• For the 2007-08 school year, 88.7 percent of students statewide met the requirement by the end of grade ten.

• There were differences in performance among subgroups at grade ten. The percentages passing were 80.4 percent for Hispanics, 81.4 percent for Blacks, 85.4 percent for American Indians, 89.4 percent for Multi-Racial, 89.8 percent for Asians, and 93.2 percent for Whites.

Findings for Eleventh Grade

(Class of 2009)

• For the 2007-08 school year, 93.0 percent of students statewide met the requirement by the end of grade eleven.

• There were differences in performance among subgroups at grade eleven. The percentages passing were 87.0 percent for Hispanics, 89.3 percent for Blacks, 90.7 percent for Asians, 92.6 percent for Multi-Racial, 92.8 percent for American Indians, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent for Whites.

Findings for Twelfth Grade

(Class of 2008)

• For the 2007-08 school year, greater than or equal to 95.0 percent of students statewide met the requirement by the end of grade twelve.

• There were differences in performance among subgroups at grade twelve. The percentages passing were 92.7 percent for Blacks, 93.2 percent for Hispanics, 94.8 percent for the American Indian, and greater than or equal to 95.0 for the Asian, Multi-Racial, and White subgroups.

Report of Student Performance

on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard

2007-08

Table of Contents

Introduction.............................................................................................................................. i

Background ............................................................................................................................. ii

Findings.....................................................................................................................................x

Statewide Performance............................................................................................................1

Student Performance by LEA and Region ..........................................................................45

Eighth Graders Taking the Performance Test for the First Time in 2006-07

and 2007-08...........................................................................................................................109

Sample Questions for the NC Tests of Computer Skills...................................................125

Sample Test Questions for Edition 1 of the Tests of Computer Skills ..............................127

Answers to Sample Questions and Notes for Edition 1 of the Tests of Computer Skills..134


Answers to Sample Questions and Notes for Edition 2 of the Tests of Computer Skills..144


Appendix ..............................................................................................................................155

List of North Carolina Charter Schools, 2007-08..............................................................157

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


i

Computer Skills Introduction In May 1991, the State Board of Education, under Feature C of the Quality Assurance Program, initially established a computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October of 1995, the Board modified the requirement by making it effective beginning with the graduating Class of 2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year and beyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergarten through grade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum originally approved in July 1992 by the State Board of Education and subsequently revised in 1998 and 2004. These competencies are defined in the North Carolina Standard Course of Study (SCS). The goals of the requirement are to ensure that: (1) most students enter high school with sufficient computer skills, and (2) no student exits North Carolina high schools without sufficient computer skills.

The North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills must be administered by the end of grade eight with subsequent opportunities at least annually during high school, as needed, to allow students the opportunity to satisfy the requirement before completing their senior year in high school. Computers have become an integral part of today’s world both in the home and marketplace; therefore, computer proficiency is an expectation for graduates of North Carolina’s high schools. Initially, in order to meet the requirement, students were required to achieve a scale score on the performance part of the test equal to or greater than 49 and a combined scale score equal to or greater than 46. Under the old standard when the pass/fail status was assigned, it was assigned for student performance for both parts of the test. The multiple-choice and performance parts of the test were considered together to determine, in a compensatory model, a student’s pass/fail status.

At the recommendation of the Computer Skills Advisory Committee, after input from educators and others, the State Board of Education modified the standard for passing the computer skills requirement effective July 1, 1997. The modified standard required that the test be separated into two tests; a multiple-choice and a performance test. Either test could be passed independently of the other. The standards for the 1992 curriculum (Test Edition 1) and the 1998 curriculum (Test Edition 2) computer skills tests require that a student achieve a performance test scale score of 49 or above and a multiple-choice test scale score of 47 or above. Eligible students with disabilities who entered grade eight for the first time in 1996-97 through the 2004-05 school year, if documented on the students’ Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), may use the Computer Skills Portfolio to assess proficiency in computer skills.

As declared in State Board of Education policy HSP-N-004 (16 NCAC 6D .0503), effective with the class entering ninth grade for the first time in the 2000-01 school year, students with disabilities in grades 9-12 may follow the North Carolina Occupational Course of Study (OCS) to fulfill requirements for a North Carolina high school diploma. These students must demonstrate computer proficiency “as specified in the IEP” in order to meet the computer skills proficiency graduation requirement. As a result, students following the OCS may fulfill the computer skills proficiency requirement by meeting the standard for the secure state-developed computer skills tests with or without accommodations. In addition, students following the OCS who entered grade eight for the first time in 1996-97 through the 2004-05 school year, if documented on the students’ Individual Education Programs (IEPs), may use the Computer Skills Portfolio Assessment Accommodation to fulfill the proficiency requirement and any combination of these assessments or other measures that are deemed appropriate as documented in the student’s current IEP. Students following the OCS who entered grade eight for the first time in the 2005-06 school year, if documented on the students’ IEPs, may use the North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment to fulfill the proficiency requirement or other measures that are deemed appropriate as documented in the student’s current IEP.

The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students who took the computer skills tests during the 2007-08 school year. This includes the Class of 2008 as twelfth graders, the Class of 2009 as eleventh graders, the Class of 2010 as tenth graders, the Class of 2011 as ninth graders, and the Class of 2012 as eighth graders. The online test of computer skills began with the 2005-06 school year. For the class of 2010 and beyond, the passing scores for proficiency is a score of 150 on the online test of computer skills and 146 for the computer skills alternative assessment. Previously published Computer Skills Reports displayed LEA level data in the pie chart series in this report; beginning in 2002-03, charter school data are also included. A PDF version of this report is available at http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/reports.


ii

Computer Skills Background

Definitions • The first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiency requirement

is during the eighth grade. Passing the computer skills standard for Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) is defined as passing both the multiple-choice and performance portions of the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills. Passing the computer skills standard for Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) is defined as passing the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills, or for eligible students, passing the North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment.

High School Class Eighth Grade Year % Passing Standard at End of Grade 8

2001 1996-97 74.8

2002 1997-98 77.5

2003 1998-99 74.9

2004 1999-00 73.0

2005 2000-01 75.9

2006 2001-02 79.3

2007 2002-03 80.4

2008 2003-04 80.8

2009 2004-05 80.9

2010 2005-06 65.4

2011 2006-07 78.9

2012 2007-08 82.0

North Carolina Standard Course of Study

• The year a student enters grade 8 determines which edition of the tests the student is to be administered in order to meet the requirement for graduation.

• 1992 Curriculum (Test Edition 1): Students who entered grade eight from the 1996-97 school year through the 1999-00 school year must meet the computer skills proficiency requirement based on the 1992 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study. The multiple-choice and performance tests measure the strands set forth and specifically defined in the 1992 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study: (1) word processing; (2) keyboarding; (3) database use; (4) spreadsheet use; (5) telecomputing skills; (6) societal issues; (7) ethics; (8) terms, operation and care of computers; and (9) the use of computers in various curricular areas. The performance test consists of four parts: (1) keyboarding techniques, (2) word processing/editing, (3) database use, and (4) spreadsheet use.


iii

North Carolina Standard Course of Study (continued)

• 1998 Curriculum (Test Edition 2): Students who entered grade eight from the 2000-01 school year through the 2004-05 school year must meet the computer skills proficiency requirement based on the 1998 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study. The multiple-choice and performance tests measure the strands set forth and specifically defined in the 1998 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study: (1) keyboard utilization/word processing/desktop publishing, (2) database use, (3) spreadsheet use, (4) telecommunications, (5) societal issues (including ethics and care/operations), and (6) multimedia presentation. The performance test consists of three parts: (1) desktop publishing, (2) database use, and (3) spreadsheet use.

• 2004 Curriculum (Test Edition 3): Students who entered grade eight in the 2005-06 school year and beyond must meet the computer skills proficiency requirement based on the 2004 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study. The Online Test of Computer Skills and the Computer Skills Alternative Assessment measure the strands set forth and specifically defined in the 2004 North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study: (1) Societal/Ethical Issues, (2) Database, (3) Spreadsheet, (4) Keyboard Utilization/Word Processing/Desktop Publishing, (5) Multimedia/Presentation, and (6) Telecommunications/Internet. Both the Online Test of Computer Skills and the Computer Skills Alternative Assessment consist of a combination of multiple-choice items and performance-based tasks (constructed response items).

The Standard • Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum): For students who entered grade eight from the 1996-97 school year through the 2004-05 school year, students must have a scale score of at least 47 on the multiple-choice test and a scale score of at least 49 on the performance test to meet the computer skills proficiency requirement. The standard is the same for both Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) of the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills. Students are retested only on the test(s) that they have not passed.

• Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum): For students who entered grade eight in the 2005-06 school year and beyond, students must have a scale score of at least 150 on the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills, or for eligible students, a scale score of at least 146 for the North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment, to meet the computer skills proficiency requirement.

Computer Skills Requirement Guidelines

• Beginning with the eighth grade, a student must be provided focused remedial instruction if the student fails to demonstrate proficiency on the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills.

• Each senior must have at least one additional opportunity to take the test during the last month of school prior to graduation to demonstrate computer proficiency.


iv

Testing Accommodations

• Accommodations are available for students with disabilities with current Individual Education Programs (IEPs) or Section 504 Plans and students identified as limited English proficient (LEP).

• Accommodations may be provided in accordance with recommendations noted in Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities and Guidelines for Testing Students with Limited English Proficiency or to fulfill the needs of individual students.

• The need for accommodations must be documented (for example, in the student’s current IEP, Section 504 Plan, or LEP plan). Accommodations used during the administration of North Carolina tests are to be consistent with routine instructional use and must not invalidate test results.

Computer Skills Portfolio Assessment Accommodation: Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) only Computer Skills Alternative Assessment: Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) only

• The expectation is that all students will take the tests during the eighth grade. The portfolio assessment accommodation is available for those students with disabilities (only) who cannot take the test under standard administration conditions or with accommodations. Portfolio use must be documented in the current IEP or Section 504 Plan.

• The purpose of portfolio assessment accommodation is not to provide an easier alternative to demonstrating competency, but to provide a student accessible alternative that meets the same high standards as the tests for students who, because of the nature of their disability, are unable to access the test or parts of the test.

• Successful completion of the portfolio is required prior to graduation.

• The expectation is that work to be included in the portfolio will be completed within the school setting over a period of time. The student’s teacher and principal must verify the authenticity of the student’s portfolio work and make the determination requiring the student’s proficiency status as demonstrated by evidence presented in the portfolio.

• The North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment may be used to meet the standard for (1) students who cannot access the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills as a result of technical/technology limitations at the building level and (2) students with disabilities who, due to the nature of their disabilities, are not able to access the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills even with the available approved accommodations.

Occupational Course of Study

• Students with disabilities following the Occupational Course of Study (OCS) meet the computer skills proficiency requirement “as specified in the IEP.” These students may or may not be required to take the computer skills tests.


v

Supported Software Packages for Performance Test: Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) only

• For the administration of the computer skills performance test, the NCDPI provides secure electronic files to accommodate the range of integrated software packages commonly used in schools. For the 2005-06 school year, the following software packages were supported:

• AppleWorks for Mac Versions 5, 6

• AppleWorks for Windows 95 Version 5

• AppleWorks for Windows 95/98/ME/XP/2000 Version 6.2

• Claris Works for Mac Versions 4, 5

• Claris Works for Windows Version 4

• MS Office Pro Versions 4, 95, 97, 2000, XP Pro, 2003

• MS Works for Windows Versions 3, 4, 2000,

2000 Suite, 6.0/2001, 2001 Suite, 7.0/2003 Suite, 2004 Suite

• MS Works for Mac Version 4

• Effective with the 1999-00 school year, the NCDPI discontinued support of the following software packages at the state level for assessment purposes:

• DOS version of PFS First Choice

• Appleworks for Apple IIe Versions 1, 2, 3, 4


• MS Works for DOS Versions 2, 3

• MS Works for Windows Version 2

• MS Works for Mac Versions 2, 3, 4

Supported Software for Online Test of Computer Skills: Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) only

• For the administration of the Online Test of Computer Skills, the NCDPI provides an application suite called NCDesk. NCDesk is designed to provide a standardized interface to the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills. NCDesk is a collection of small Java™ programs that replicate common applications.

• The five primary programs included in NCDesk are: (1) a word processing/text

editing application, (2) a database application, (3) a spreadsheet application, (4) an e-mail application, and (5) a window management application. NCDesk programs perform a limited set of functions and can be used externally from the test. NCDesk also includes a Test Simulation used to familiarize students with the test environment. When using NCDesk for learning and practice, the software does not require connection to the Internet. However, when used for testing, NCDesk communicates to a central "testing" server to get test items and collect responses


vi

Supported Software for Online Test of Computer Skills: Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) only (continued) Supported Software Packages for Computer Skills Alternative Edition Assessment: Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) only

from students. NCDesk is a locally installed client application and requires client computers to have a Java™ runtime installation. Unlike with previous editions of the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, the use of NCDesk eliminates the need for supporting multiple software packages to deliver the test. More information on NCDesk can be found at http://cskills.ncsu.edu/ncdesk/.

• For the administration of the Computer Skills Alternative Assessment, the NCDPI provides secure electronic files to accommodate the range of integrated software packages commonly used in schools. For the 2007-08 school year, the following software packages were supported:

• AppleWorks for Mac Versions 5, 6

• AppleWorks for Windows 95 Version 5

• AppleWorks for Windows 95/98/ME/XP/2000 Version 6.2

• Claris Works for Mac Version 4, 5

• Claris Works for Windows Version 4

• MS Office Pro Versions 4, 95, 97, 2000, XP Pro, 2003

• MS Works for Windows Versions 3, 4, 2000, 2000 Suite, 6.0/2001 Suite, 7.0/2003 Suite, 2004 Suite

• MS Works for Mac Version 4


• MS Works for DOS Versions 2, 3

• MS Works for Windows Version 2

• MS Works for Mac Versions 2, 3, 4


vii

Scoring the Tests: Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum) only Scoring the Tests: Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) only Data Verification

• Beginning in the spring of 2005-06, the LEAs provided the scoring for all computer skills portfolios for that system.

• The LEA test coordinator, the exceptional children director, and the computer coordinator provide direction for the scoring and approval process for completed computer skills portfolios. The LEA may involve other personnel as deemed appropriate.

• For the 2007-08 school year, the multiple-choice tests [for both Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum)] were scored and aggregated locally. The performance tests [for both Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum)] were scored by a contractor who provided score reports in the form of electronic rosters to the LEAs.

• For the 2006-07 school year, the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills was scored electronically and results provided to LEAs by a contractor in the form CSV rosters.

• For the 2006-07 school year, the North Carolina Computer Skills Alternative Assessment was scanned, scored, and aggregated locally.

• The LEAs provided the NCDPI with a pass/fail flag for each student enrolled by submitting electronic files in the spring of 2006. LEAs exclude visiting, transfer, and foreign-exchange students based on a NCDPI directive. In order to protect student confidentiality, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five, and, performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

Differences in Data Collection and Analysis: 1997-98 to 2007-08

• The data collected for the computer skills tests in 1997 and 1998 used the same denominator, which included the number of pupils tested in both performance and multiple choice. In 1999, 2000, and 2001, the denominator included the number of pupils on the NCDPI “masterbuild" file, including absent and foreign-exchange pupils (but did not include visiting students). In 1999 and beyond, the denominator included the number of students who were exempted from participation in the test administrations. In 2002-03 foreign exchange, dually enrolled, and students not subject to the standard were excluded. In 2003-04 visiting students, Occupational Course of Study students, IEP exclusion students, foreign exchange students, and transfer students were excluded. In 2004-05 and beyond, visiting students, IEP exclusion students, foreign exchange students, and transfer students were excluded. These differences should be noted when making comparisons from year to year. As the testing program and methods of reporting data are standardized, differences in data reporting will be eliminated.

• In 1997, fall and spring data were merged centrally and LEAs had the opportunity to correct the final file of pupils. In 1998, all test administrations from fall 1997 to spring 1998 were merged centrally, accounting for the North Carolina State Board of Education’s change in the standard. Most school systems edited the merged files locally and returned a file of pupil data that had a pass/fail flag for performance and a pass/fail flag for multiple choice. In


viii

Differences in Data Collection and Analysis: 1997-98 to 2007-08 (continued)

1999, a blank form was sent to LEAs to collect summary data (not pupil data), with a column for the number of pupils on the “masterbuild” file (including exempt and absent pupils), and a column for the number passing both performance and multiple choice. Since 2000-01, the LEAs updated scores as needed in their data systems and submitted electronic files that contained each pupil's pass/fail flag (data updated after September 15, 2008 are not incorporated in the 2007-08 report). Every year, it was the responsibility of the LEA to submit accurate data and the NCDPI reported data that was submitted.

• Since the 2000-01 data year, some required reporting variables were added by merging the most recent electronic files with other testing files where the required variables had been collected. For 2007-08, the merge included previous years’ computer skills data and current data collected for the state’s ABCs analysis. Information from the other testing files was only applied to a student record when the student's last name, identification number, and gender were identical; therefore, information was not obtained for students where name or identification number changed or was miscoded. Also, duplicates, when found, were removed to reflect the most complete data.

Resources Provided by NCDPI

• Lesson plans and staff development activities have been provided by the NCDPI since the computer skills curriculum was revised in 1992. Some of the lesson plans are available on the DPI InfoWeb (www.ncpublicschools.org) and through the NCDPI Office of Publications.

• Test Edition 1 (1992 curriculum) and Test Edition 2 (1998 curriculum): The NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program provides all school systems and charter schools with ample copies of the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Student Handbook to be distributed to the appropriate students. The handbook includes information about the graduation proficiency requirement, computer skills test-taking strategies, and sample questions. Students may practice answering the same sample questions interactively via the Testing Program website. In addition, information regarding rubrics for scoring the sample performance questions in the handbook is located at the same site..

• Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum): The NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section provides year-round accessibility to the NCDesk proprietary software which is used for delivering the North Carolina Online Test of Computer Skills. NCDesk comes installed with an embedded Test Simulation, an abbreviated functional demonstration of how the test interface works. The Test Simulation provides students, administrators, and parents with the opportunity to become familiar with the test environment (i.e., appearance, navigation) and the use of features/functions within the test environment. The Test Simulation consists of three sections containing ten sample items each. In addition, NCDesk includes access to the five primary test applications integrated in and used during the test. The applications are: (1) a word processing/text editing application, (2) a database application, (3) a spreadsheet spreadsheet application, (4) an e-mail application, and (5) a window management application. More information on NCDesk, the Test


ix

Simulation, and other resources for Test Edition 3 (2004 curriculum) is available at http://cskills.ncsu.edu/nccs/.

• A PDF version of this report is available at: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/reports


x

Findings 2007-08 Student Performance

Student Performance by Ethnicity

• For the 2007-08 school year, 82.0 percent of eighth graders, 80.7 percent of ninth graders, 88.7 percent of tenth graders, 93.0 percent of eleventh graders, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent of twelfth graders passed the computer skills graduation proficiency requirement.

• The percent of eighth graders passing the requirement increased from 80.4 percent in 2003-04 to 82.0 percent in 2007-08.

• The number of students in the cohort participating in the administration of the computer skills tests statewide from 2003-04 (in grade 8) to 2007-08 (in grade 12) decreased from 109,304 students to 84,858 students, a 22.4 percent decrease.

• By the end of the 2007-08 school year, a smaller percentage of eighth graders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Black (70.1%), Hispanic (71.1%) and American Indian (72.5%) subgroups than the Multi-Racial (85.5%), Asian (88.2%), and White (90.0%) subgroups.

• The percent of eighth graders passing the proficiency requirement decreased for the American Indian subgroup from 2003-04 (77.4%) to 2007-08 (72.5%), while increasing for the Hispanic subgroup from 2003-04 (60.7%) to 2007-08 (71.1%), for the Black subgroup from 2003-04 (68.0%) to 2007-08 (70.1%), for the Multi-Racial subgroup from 2003-04 (83.1%) to 2007-08 (85.5%), for the Asian subgroup from 2003-04 (87.0%) to 2007-08 (88.2%), and for the White subgroup from 2003-04 (89.1%) to 2007-08 (90.0%).

• By the end of the 2007-08 school year, the percentages passing for ninth graders were 68.3 percent for Hispanics, 70.4 percent for Blacks, 74.9 percent for American Indians, 79.6 percent for Asians, 82.5 percent for Multi-Racial, and 88.9 percent for Whites.

• By the end of the 2007-08 school year, the percentages passing for tenth graders were 80.4 percent for Hispanics, 81.4 percent for Blacks, 85.4 percent for American Indians, 89.8 percent for Asians, 89.4 percent for Multi-Racial, and 93.2 percent for Whites.

• By the end of the 2007-08 school year, the percentages passing for eleventh graders were 87.0 percent for Hispanics, 89.3 percent for Blacks, 90.7 percent for Asians, 92.6 percent for Multi-Racial, 92.8 percent for American Indians, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent for Whites.

• By the end of the 2007-08 school year, the percentages passing for twelfth graders were 92.7 percent for Blacks, 94.8 percent for the American Indians, 93.2 percent for Hispanics, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent for the Asian, Multi-Racial, and White subgroups.


xi

Student Performance by Ethnicity (continued) Student Performance by Gender Performance of Students with Disabilities

• For the Class of 2008, the percent of students passing the proficiency requirement by ethnic subgroup from 2003-04 (cohort at grade 8) to 2007-08 (cohort at grade 12) increased significantly for the Black subgroup (from 68.0% of 33,016 students in 2003-04 to 92.7% of 23,914 students in 2007-08); the Hispanic subgroup (from 60.7% of 6,068 students in 2003-04 to 93.2% of 4,448 students in 2007-08); and the American Indian subgroup (from 77.4% of 1,550 students in 2003-04 to 94.8% of 1,068 students in 2007-08). The Multi-Racial subgroup (from 83.1% of 1,878 students in 2003-04 to greater than or equal to 95.0 of 1,620 students in 2007-08); the Asian subgroup (from 87.0% of 2,115 students in 2003-04 to greater than or equal to 95.0% of 2,011 students in 2007-08); and the White subgroup (from 89.1% of 64,677 students in 2003-04 to greater than or equal to 95.0% of 51,797 students in 2007-08) also showed an increase in the percentage passing.

• The number of eligible students in the cohort participating in the administration of the computer skills tests at grade 8 in 2003-04 to grade 12 in 2007-08 decreased: for the Hispanic subgroup by 26.7 percent (6,068 students in 2003-04 to 4,448 students in 2007-08); for the White subgroup by 19.9 percent (64,677 students in 2003-04 to 51,797 students in 2007-08); for the Black subgroup by 27.6 percent (33,016 students in 2003-04 to 23,914 students in 2007-08); and for the American Indian subgroup by 31.1 percent (1,550 students in 2003-04 to 1,068 students in 2007-08). The number of students in the cohort decreased for the Asian subgroup by 4.9 percent (2,115 students in 2003-04 to 2,011 students in 2007-08) and the Multi-Racial subgroup by 13.7 percent (1,878 students in 2003-04 to 1,620 students in 2007-08).

• Females have higher passing rates than males on the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills. At the end of the 2007-08 school year, 85.2 percent of females and 79.0 percent of males had passed at the end of grade eight. At the end of grade twelve, greater than or equal to 95.0 percent for females and 94.6 percent for males had passed.

• For the 2007-08 school year, 56.3 percent of 16,191 eighth-grade students with disabilities (including students identified only under Section 504) met the computer proficiency requirement. Also, 58.6 percent of 16,389 ninth-grade students, 68.1 percent of 11,582 tenth-grade students, 73.7 percent of 9,857 eleventh-grade students, and 74.1 percent of 7,992 twelfth-grade students with disabilities passed.


xii

Performance of Students Identified as Limited English Proficient Eighth Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills Test for the First Time in 2007-08

• For students identified as limited English proficient, 58.8 percent of 6,037 students in grade 8 met the computer proficiency standard in 2007-08. For the other grades in 2007-08, 53.3 percent of 6,695 students at grade 9, 69.6 percent of 3,783 students at grade 10, 78.4 percent of 2,839 students at grade 11, and 90.6 percent of 2,706 students at grade 12 met the computer proficiency requirement in 2007-08.

• In 2007-08, 112,824 eighth graders took the online test of computer skills test for the first time. The percent of the students passing the on their first attempt was 69.8 percent in comparison to 67.5 percent in 2006-07, a slight increase (2.3%).

• There were disparities among subgroups. The Black (51.5%), American Indian (56.0%) and Hispanic (53.8%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the test than the Multi-Racial (73.4%), Asian (79.6%), and White (82.0%) subgroups. More females (73.9%) passed than males (65.9%).

• From 2006-07 to 2007-08, the percent of students passing the test increased for all ethnic subgroups: Black (47.7% to 51.5%), Hispanic (49.7% to 53.8%), American Indian (54.9% to 56.0%), Asian (78.7% to 79.6%), Multi-Racial (71.0% to 73.4%), and White (80.4% to 82.0%).

• Students whose school computers were located in a lab setting (71.2%) had slightly lower passing rates than students whose school computers were located in class (73.4%) or in the media center/library (73.1%).

• Predictably, the percent passing for students with access to computers outside of class all the time (78.4%) was higher than for students with no access outside of class (36.0%) or the occasional access outside of class (58.9%). Students who often have opportunities to use computers to plan, develop, or present information, activities and/or projects (79.3%), had a higher passing rate than students who have such opportunities sometimes (65.1%) or never (43.0%).

• The percent proficient of students with disabilities in the eighth grade who took the online test of computer skills for the first time relatively stayed the same from 38.8 percent in 2006-07 to 38.7 percent in 2007-08.

• The percent of students identified under Section 504 who met the proficiency standard increased from 59.8 percent in 2006-07 to 65.1 percent in 2007-08 (5.3%).

• For students identified as limited English proficient, 37.1 percent passed in 2007-08 in comparison to 29.9 percent in 2006-07, a 7.2 percent increase.


N %

Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient Participating ParticipatingAll Students 112,824 111,989 99.3 82.0 835 0.7 111,989 99.3Female 54,974 54,656 99.4 85.2 318 0.6 54,656 99.4Male 57,850 57,333 99.1 79.0 517 0.9 57,333 99.1American Indian 1,641 1,626 99.1 72.5 15 0.9 1,626 99.1Asian 2,588 2,580 99.7 88.2 8 0.3 2,580 99.7Black 33,316 32,966 98.9 70.1 350 1.1 32,966 98.9Hispanic 10,086 9,991 99.1 71.1 95 0.9 9,991 99.1Multi-Racial 3,214 3,185 99.1 85.5 29 0.9 3,185 99.1White 61,979 61,641 99.5 90.0 338 0.5 61,641 99.5Economically Disadvantaged 51,118 50,688 99.2 72.1 430 0.8 50,688 99.2Not Economically Disadvantaged 61,706 61,301 99.3 90.2 405 0.7 61,301 99.3Title I 16,497 16,352 99.1 76.8 145 0.9 16,352 99.1Non-Title I 96,327 95,637 99.3 82.9 690 0.7 95,637 99.3Schoolwide Title I Program 15,982 15,837 99.1 77.1 145 0.9 15,837 99.1Targeted Assistance 452 452 100.0 70.1 0 0.0 452 100.0Migrant 89 89 100.0 52.8 0 0.0 89 100.0Not Migrant 112,735 111,900 99.3 82.0 835 0.7 111,900 99.3Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 6,037 5,975 99.0 58.8 62 1.0 5,975 99.0Not LEP 106,787 106,014 99.3 83.3 773 0.7 106,014 99.3Students with IEPs 13,957 13,731 98.4 52.4 226 1.6 13,731 98.4Students without IEPs 98,867 98,258 99.4 86.2 609 0.6 98,258 99.4Students with Disabilities 16,191 15,965 98.6 56.3 226 1.4 15,965 98.6Students without Disabilities 96,633 96,024 99.4 86.3 609 0.6 96,024 99.4Autism 621 596 96.0 40.6 25 4.0 596 96.0Deaf-Blindness 1 1 100.0 * 0 0.0 1 100.0Deafness 0 0 0.0 * 0 0.0 0 0.0Serious Emotional Disability 1,054 1,010 95.8 49.1 44 4.2 1,010 95.8Hearing Impairment 151 150 99.3 57.6 1 0.7 150 99.3Intellectual Disability-Mild 1,909 1,875 98.2 23.6 34 1.8 1,875 98.2Intellectual Disability-Moderate 355 326 91.8 <=5% 29 8.2 326 91.8Intellectual Disability-Severe 56 53 94.6 <=5% 3 5.4 53 94.6Specific Learning Disability 6,163 6,123 99.4 63.1 40 0.6 6,123 99.4Multiple Disabilities 153 137 89.5 <=5% 16 10.5 137 89.5Other Health Impairment 3,116 3,085 99.0 59.8 31 1.0 3,085 99.0Orthopedic Impairment 57 57 100.0 68.4 0 0.0 57 100.0Speech or Language Impairment 236 235 99.6 67.4 1 0.4 235 99.6Traumatic Brain Injury 37 35 94.6 43.2 2 5.4 35 94.6Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 48 48 100.0 60.4 0 0.0 48 100.0Section 504 2,234 2,234 100.0 80.4 0 0.0 2,234 100.0Notes: 1"Membership" is the number of student grade enrollment records in schools' information systems on the first day of test administration in the testing cycle.

*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilities (CECAS). These data represent coding on the 2007-08 test documents. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table.

Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,Grade 8

1

Category

2N Tested" is the number of students who took the computer skills tests.

Not Tested

N Absent/ Other

% Absent/ Other

Table 1. North Carolina Testing ProgramComputer Skills Annual Assessment, 2007-08

Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


N %

Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient Participating ParticipatingAll Students 127,125 125,663 98.8 80.7 1,462 1.2 125,663 98.8Female 60,411 59,851 99.1 83.6 560 0.9 59,851 99.1Male 66,714 65,812 98.6 78.1 902 1.4 65,812 98.6American Indian 1,808 1,791 99.1 74.9 17 0.9 1,791 99.1Asian 2,846 2,806 98.6 79.6 40 1.4 2,806 98.6Black 39,994 39,295 98.3 70.4 699 1.7 39,295 98.3Hispanic 11,239 11,046 98.3 68.3 193 1.7 11,046 98.3Multi-Racial 3,219 3,176 98.7 82.5 43 1.3 3,176 98.7White 68,019 67,549 99.3 88.9 470 0.7 67,549 99.3Economically Disadvantaged 54,654 54,000 98.8 72.8 654 1.2 54,000 98.8Not Economically Disadvantaged 72,471 71,663 98.9 86.7 808 1.1 71,663 98.9Title I 4,266 4,216 98.8 69.1 50 1.2 4,216 98.8Non-Title I 122,859 121,447 98.9 81.1 1,412 1.1 121,447 98.9Schoolwide Title I Program 4,177 4,129 98.9 69.6 48 1.1 4,129 98.9Targeted Assistance 15 15 100.0 60.0 0 0.0 15 100.0Migrant 82 80 97.6 45.1 2 2.4 80 97.6Not Migrant 127,043 125,583 98.9 80.7 1,460 1.1 125,583 98.9Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 6,695 6,547 97.8 53.3 148 2.2 6,547 97.8Not LEP 120,430 119,116 98.9 82.2 1,314 1.1 119,116 98.9Students with IEPs 15,724 15,509 98.6 57.3 215 1.4 15,509 98.6Students without IEPs 111,401 110,154 98.9 84.0 1,247 1.1 110,154 98.9Students with Disabilities 16,389 16,169 98.7 58.6 220 1.3 16,169 98.7Students without Disabilities 110,736 109,494 98.9 84.0 1,242 1.1 109,494 98.9Autism 538 532 98.9 41.6 6 1.1 532 98.9Deaf-Blindness 3 3 100.0 * 0 0.0 3 100.0Deafness 1 1 100.0 * 0 0.0 1 100.0Serious Emotional Disability 1,438 1,393 96.9 48.5 45 3.1 1,393 96.9Hearing Impairment 155 154 99.4 63.2 1 0.6 154 99.4Intellectual Disability-Mild 2,236 2,205 98.6 28.7 31 1.4 2,205 98.6Intellectual Disability-Moderate 398 392 98.5 <=5% 6 1.5 392 98.5Intellectual Disability-Severe 71 69 97.2 7.0 2 2.8 69 97.2Specific Learning Disability 7,068 6,996 99.0 69.6 72 1.0 6,996 99.0Multiple Disabilities 190 179 94.2 5.3 11 5.8 179 94.2Other Health Impairment 3,316 3,278 98.9 66.8 38 1.1 3,278 98.9Orthopedic Impairment 87 86 98.9 63.2 1 1.1 86 98.9Speech or Language Impairment 122 121 99.2 59.0 1 0.8 121 99.2Traumatic Brain Injury 52 51 98.1 38.5 1 1.9 51 98.1Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 49 49 100.0 59.2 0 0.0 49 100.0Section 504 665 660 99.2 89.5 5 0.8 660 99.2Notes: 1"Membership" is the number of student grade enrollment records in schools' information systems on the first day of test administration in the testing cycle.


Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,


2

Category

Not Tested

N Absent/ Other

% Absent/ Other

Table 2. North Carolina Testing Program

Grade 9

Computer Skills Annual Assessment, 2007-08



N %

Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient Participating ParticipatingAll Students 103,346 102,355 99.0 88.7 991 1.0 102,355 99.0Female 51,695 51,298 99.2 90.1 397 0.8 51,298 99.2Male 51,651 51,057 98.8 87.2 594 1.2 51,057 98.8American Indian 1,396 1,385 99.2 85.4 11 0.8 1,385 99.2Asian 2,404 2,394 99.6 89.8 10 0.4 2,394 99.6Black 29,660 29,212 98.5 81.4 448 1.5 29,212 98.5Hispanic 7,080 6,975 98.5 80.4 105 1.5 6,975 98.5Multi-Racial 2,376 2,348 98.8 89.4 28 1.2 2,348 98.8White 60,430 60,041 99.4 93.2 389 0.6 60,041 99.4Economically Disadvantaged 37,032 36,608 98.9 83.1 424 1.1 36,608 98.9Not Economically Disadvantaged 66,314 65,747 99.1 91.8 567 0.9 65,747 99.1Title I 3,231 3,190 98.7 82.9 41 1.3 3,190 98.7Non-Title I 100,115 99,165 99.1 88.9 950 0.9 99,165 99.1Schoolwide Title I Program 3,175 3,134 98.7 83.2 41 1.3 3,134 98.7Targeted Assistance 0 0 0.0 * * * 0 0.0Migrant 59 59 100.0 67.8 0 0.0 59 100.0Not Migrant 103,287 102,296 99.0 88.7 991 1.0 102,296 99.0Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 3,783 3,719 98.3 69.6 64 1.7 3,719 98.3Not LEP 99,563 98,636 99.1 89.4 927 0.9 98,636 99.1Students with IEPs 10,868 10,725 98.7 66.5 143 1.3 10,725 98.7Students without IEPs 92,478 91,630 99.1 91.3 848 0.9 91,630 99.1Students with Disabilities 11,582 11,438 98.8 68.1 144 1.2 11,438 98.8Students without Disabilities 91,764 90,917 99.1 91.3 847 0.9 90,917 99.1Autism 480 474 98.8 47.1 6 1.3 474 98.8Deaf-Blindness 2 2 100.0 * 0 0.0 2 100.0Deafness 1 1 100.0 * 0 0.0 1 100.0Serious Emotional Disability 697 664 95.3 63.1 33 4.7 664 95.3Hearing Impairment 124 122 98.4 70.2 2 1.6 122 98.4Intellectual Disability-Mild 1,691 1,670 98.8 31.6 21 1.2 1,670 98.8Intellectual Disability-Moderate 284 281 98.9 9.2 3 1.1 281 98.9Intellectual Disability-Severe 35 35 100.0 5.7 0 0.0 35 100.0Specific Learning Disability 5,013 4,967 99.1 81.0 46 0.9 4,967 99.1Multiple Disabilities 111 105 94.6 <=5% 6 5.4 105 94.6Other Health Impairment 2,191 2,166 98.9 76.4 25 1.1 2,166 98.9Orthopedic Impairment 71 71 100.0 71.8 0 0.0 71 100.0Speech or Language Impairment 74 74 100.0 73.0 0 0.0 74 100.0Traumatic Brain Injury 47 46 97.9 61.7 1 2.1 46 97.9Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 47 47 100.0 68.1 0 0.0 47 100.0Section 504 714 713 99.9 92.6 1 0.1 713 99.9Notes: 1"Membership" is the number of student grade enrollment records in schools' information systems on the first day of test administration in the testing cycle.




3

Category

Not Tested

N Absent/ Other

% Absent/ Other




N %

Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient Participating ParticipatingAll Students 94,149 92,886 98.7 93.0 1,263 1.3 92,886 98.7Female 47,524 46,963 98.8 94.1 561 1.2 46,963 98.8Male 46,625 45,923 98.5 92.0 702 1.5 45,923 98.5American Indian 1,190 1,176 98.8 92.8 14 1.2 1,176 98.8Asian 2,194 2,165 98.7 90.7 29 1.3 2,165 98.7Black 26,391 25,932 98.3 89.3 459 1.7 25,932 98.3Hispanic 5,625 5,517 98.1 87.0 108 1.9 5,517 98.1Multi-Racial 1,971 1,947 98.8 92.6 24 1.2 1,947 98.8White 56,778 56,149 98.9 >=95% 629 1.1 56,149 98.9Economically Disadvantaged 30,137 29,670 98.5 89.2 467 1.5 29,670 98.5Not Economically Disadvantaged 64,012 63,216 98.8 94.9 796 1.2 63,216 98.8Title I 2,984 2,944 98.7 89.7 40 1.3 2,944 98.7Non-Title I 91,165 89,942 98.7 93.2 1,223 1.3 89,942 98.7Schoolwide Title I Program 2,958 2,918 98.6 90.0 40 1.4 2,918 98.6Targeted Assistance 0 0 0.0 * 0 0.0 0 0.0Migrant 28 28 100.0 57.1 0 0.0 28 100.0Not Migrant 94,121 92,858 98.7 93.1 1,263 1.3 92,858 98.7Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 2,839 2,778 97.9 78.4 61 2.1 2,778 97.9Not LEP 91,310 90,108 98.7 93.5 1,202 1.3 90,108 98.7Students with IEPs 9,313 9,179 98.6 72.4 134 1.4 9,179 98.6Students without IEPs 84,836 83,707 98.7 >=95% 1,129 1.3 83,707 98.7Students with Disabilities 9,857 9,719 98.6 73.7 138 1.4 9,719 98.6Students without Disabilities 84,292 83,167 98.7 >=95% 1,125 1.3 83,167 98.7Autism 429 424 98.8 45.5 5 1.2 424 98.8Deaf-Blindness 2 2 100.0 * 0 0.0 2 100.0Deafness 1 1 100.0 * 0 0.0 1 100.0Serious Emotional Disability 425 412 96.9 75.5 13 3.1 412 96.9Hearing Impairment 117 117 100.0 80.3 0 0.0 117 100.0Intellectual Disability-Mild 1,543 1,520 98.5 40.4 23 1.5 1,520 98.5Intellectual Disability-Moderate 398 391 98.2 14.8 7 1.8 391 98.2Intellectual Disability-Severe 78 76 97.4 9.0 2 2.6 76 97.4Specific Learning Disability 4,206 4,147 98.6 89.8 59 1.4 4,147 98.6Multiple Disabilities 202 197 97.5 14.4 5 2.5 197 97.5Other Health Impairment 1,715 1,695 98.8 85.8 20 1.2 1,695 98.8Orthopedic Impairment 67 67 100.0 83.6 0 0.0 67 100.0Speech or Language Impairment 48 48 100.0 85.4 0 0.0 48 100.0Traumatic Brain Injury 46 46 100.0 67.4 0 0.0 46 100.0Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 36 36 100.0 86.1 0 0.0 36 100.0Section 504 544 540 99.3 >=95% 4 0.7 540 99.3Notes: 1"Membership" is the number of student grade enrollment records in schools' information systems on the first day of test administration in the testing cycle.


N Absent/ Other

% Absent/ Other


4




Category

Not Tested


N %

Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient Participating ParticipatingAll Students 84,858 84,003 99.0 >=95% 855 1.0 84,003 99.0Female 43,075 42,701 99.1 >=95% 374 0.9 42,701 99.1Male 41,783 41,302 98.8 94.6 481 1.2 41,302 98.8American Indian 1,068 1,064 99.6 94.8 4 0.4 1,064 99.6Asian 2,011 1,994 99.2 >=95% 17 0.8 1,994 99.2Black 23,914 23,613 98.7 92.7 301 1.3 23,613 98.7Hispanic 4,448 4,367 98.2 93.2 81 1.8 4,367 98.2Multi-Racial 1,620 1,602 98.9 >=95% 18 1.1 1,602 98.9White 51,797 51,363 99.2 >=95% 434 0.8 51,363 99.2Economically Disadvantaged 24,453 24,181 98.9 92.1 272 1.1 24,181 98.9Not Economically Disadvantaged 60,405 59,822 99.0 >=95% 583 1.0 59,822 99.0Title I 2,699 2,678 99.2 93.0 21 0.8 2,678 99.2Non-Title I 82,159 81,325 99.0 >=95% 834 1.0 81,325 99.0Schoolwide Title I Program 2,684 2,664 99.3 93.0 20 0.7 2,664 99.3Targeted Assistance 0 0 0.0 * 0 0.0 0 0.0Migrant 15 14 93.3 93.3 1 6.7 14 93.3Not Migrant 84,843 83,989 99.0 >=95% 854 1.0 83,989 99.0Limited English Proficiency (LEP) 2,076 2,036 98.1 90.6 40 1.9 2,036 98.1Not LEP 82,782 81,967 99.0 >=95% 815 1.0 81,967 99.0Students with IEPs 7,880 7,806 99.1 73.8 74 0.9 7,806 99.1Students without IEPs 76,978 76,197 99.0 >=95% 781 1.0 76,197 99.0Students with Disabilities 7,992 7,916 99.0 74.1 76 1.0 7,916 99.0Students without Disabilities 76,866 76,087 99.0 >=95% 779 1.0 76,087 99.0Autism 346 344 99.4 38.2 2 0.6 344 99.4Deaf-Blindness 3 3 100.0 * 0 0.0 3 100.0Deafness 2 2 100.0 * 0 0.0 2 100.0Serious Emotional Disability 288 276 95.8 81.6 12 4.2 276 95.8Hearing Impairment 94 93 98.9 86.2 1 1.1 93 98.9Intellectual Disability-Mild 1,379 1,368 99.2 44.7 11 0.8 1,368 99.2Intellectual Disability-Moderate 420 414 98.6 11.7 6 1.4 414 98.6Intellectual Disability-Severe 98 92 93.9 11.2 6 6.1 92 93.9Specific Learning Disability 3,566 3,546 99.4 93.3 20 0.6 3,546 99.4Multiple Disabilities 177 176 99.4 9.6 1 0.6 176 99.4Other Health Impairment 1,315 1,300 98.9 90.9 15 1.1 1,300 98.9Orthopedic Impairment 58 58 100.0 60.3 0 0.0 58 100.0Speech or Language Impairment 32 32 100.0 93.8 0 0.0 32 100.0Traumatic Brain Injury 61 61 100.0 78.7 0 0.0 61 100.0Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 41 41 100.0 87.8 0 0.0 41 100.0Section 504 112 110 98.2 >=95% 2 1.8 110 98.2Notes: 1"Membership" is the number of student grade enrollment records in schools' information systems on the first day of test administration in the testing cycle.


5




Category

Not Tested

N Absent/ Other

% Absent/ Other


2003-04 Class of 2008N Passing = 88,350Membership=109,304

2004-05 Class of 2009N Passing = 88,679Membership=109,678

2005-06 Class of 2010N Passing = 72,643Membership= 111,004

2006-07 Class of 2011 Class of 2010N Passing = 87,588 N Passing = 93,800 N Passing = 93,665 N Passing = 87,005Membership= 111,030 Membership= 124,572 Membership= 103,565 Membership= 93,903

2007-08 Class of 2012 Class of 2011N Passing = 92,526 N Passing = 102,595 N Passing = 91,638 N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = **Membership= 112,824 Membership= 127,125 Membership= 103,346 Membership= 94,149 Membership= 84,858

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Class of 2009 Class of 2008N Passing = 98,228 N Passing = 90,509Membership= 118,838 Membership= 100,376

at End of Grades 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12


Figure 1. 2003-04 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing the Standard*

for the Classes of 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

Membership=123,567

Class of 2008N Passing =101,011

Class of 2010 Class of 2009 Class of 2008

Class of 2009 Class of 2008

78.9

75.382

.0

80.7 88

.7 93.0

80.8 81.7

80.9

90.2

82.7

65.4

92.7

90.4 >=95

.0

0102030405060708090

100

8th grade 9th grade 10th grade 11th grade 12th grade

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

6

2003-04 Class of 2008(In Grade 8)

N Passing = 88,350Membership=109,304

2004-05 Class of 2008 Class of 2009(In Grade 9) (In Grade 8)

N Passing = 101,011 N Passing = 88,679Membership= 123,567 Membership=109,678

2005-06 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2010(In Grade 10) (In Grade 9) (In Grade 8)

N Passing = 90,509 N Passing = 98,228 N Passing = 72,643 Membership= 100,376 Membership= 118,838 Membership= 111,004

2006-07 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2010 Class of 2011(In Grade 11) (In Grade 10) (In Grade 9) (In Grade 8)

N Passing = 87,005 N Passing = 93,665 N Passing = 93,800 N Passing = 87,588 Membership= 93,903 Membership= 103,565 Membership= 124,572 Membership= 111,030

2007-08 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012(In Grade 12) (In Grade 11) (In Grade 10) (In Grade 9) (In Grade 8)

N Passing = ** N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = 91,638 N Passing = 102,595 N Passing = 92,526 Membership= 84,858 Membership= 94,149 Membership= 103,346 Membership= 127,125 Membership= 112,824

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

7

Across Years by Cohort



for the Classes of 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012,

80.4 80.8

65.4

78.9 82.082.0 82.775.3

80.790.2 90.4 88.792.7 93.0>=95.0

0102030405060708090

100

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

8th grade 9th grade 10th grade 11th grade 12th grade

Class of:

1997-98 N Passing = 70,480 N Passing = 867 N Passing =1,120 N Passing =14,794 N Passing =1,155 N Passing = 962 N Passing =51,282Class of 2002 N Tested = 90,906 N Tested =1,394 N Tested =1,437 N Tested =25,467 N Tested =1,982 N Tested =1,238 N Tested =58,910

1998-99 N Passing = 71,457 N Passing = 861 N Passing =1,212 N Passing =16,422 N Passing =1,303 N Passing = 469 N Passing =51,176Class of 2003 N Tested = 95,377 N Tested =1,433 N Tested =1,664 N Tested =28,071 N Tested =2,622 N Tested = 641 N Tested =60,924

1999-00 N Passing = 69,080 N Passing = 886 N Passing =1,292 N Passing =15,347 N Passing =1,415 N Passing = 548 N Passing =49,591Class of 2004 Membership= 94,620 Membership=1,402 Membership=1,683 Membership=27,559 Membership=3,024 Membership= 747 Membership=60,204


2001-02 N Passing = 81,274 N Passing =1,002 N Passing =1,601 N Passing = 19,965 N Passing =2,445 N Passing =1,009 N Passing =55,228Class of 2006 Membership=102,532 Membership=1,407 Membership=1,916 Membership=30,404 Membership=4,514 Membership=1,256 Membership=62,983

2002-03 N Passing = 85,287 N Passing =1,109 N Passing =1,739 N Passing =21,304 N Passing =3,109 N Passing =1,258 N Passing =56,768Class of 2007 Membership=106,055 Membership=1,488 Membership=2,044 Membership=31,764 Membership=5,334 Membership=1,540 Membership=63,885



2005-06 N Passing = 72,643 N Passing = 915 N Passing = 1,758 N Passing = 14,789 N Passing = 3,789 N Passing = 1,705 N Passing = 49,687Class of 2010 Membership= 111,004 Membership= 1,627 Membership= 2,242 Membership= 33,648 Membership= 7,941 Membership= 2,464 Membership= 63,082

2006-07 N Passing = 87,588 N Passing =1,135 N Passing =2,002 N Passing = 21,443 N Passing = 5,557 N Passing = 2,288 N Passing =55,163Class of 2011 Membership= 111,030 Membership=1,573 Membership=2,341 Membership= 33,362 Membership= 8,746 Membership= 2,790 Membership=62,218

2007-08 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing =1,190 N Passing =2,283 N Passing = 23,349 N Passing = 7,172 N Passing = 2,749 N Passing =55,783Class of 2012 Membership= 112,824 Membership=1,641 Membership=2,588 Membership= 33,316 Membership= 10,086 Membership= 3,214 Membership=61,979

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01through 2004-5 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Percent Passing the Standard* for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

at End of Grade 8, by Ethnicity

Figure 3. 1998-99 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

85.1

80.9

78.1 83

.1

69.3

62.5

82.1

65.4

56.2

78.4

44.0 47

.7

69.2

78.882

.0

72.5

88.2

70.1

71.1

85.5 90

.0

77.5

62.2

77.9

58.1

58.3

77.7

87.1

58.5

74.9

60.1

72.8

49.7

73.2

84.0

73.0

63.2

76.8

55.7

46.8

73.4

82.4

75.9

64.9

80.2

60.2

50.2

78.6

85.0

79.3

71.2

83.6

65.7

54.2

80.3

87.7

88.9

81.7

58.3

67.1

74.580

.4

89.1

83.1

60.768

.0

87.0

77.480

.8

88.8

88.7

82.0

63.5

64.3

85.5

72.278

.9

0102030405060708090

100

State American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

8

1997-98 N Passing = 71,204 N Passing =1,021 N Passing =1,037 N Passing =15,895 N Passing =1,080 N Passing = 858 N Passing =50,869Class of 2001 N Tested = 87,061 N Tested =1,492 N Tested =1,255 N Tested =24,113 N Tested =1,714 N Tested =1,074 N Tested =56,795

1998-99 N Passing = 73,839 N Passing = 958 N Passing =1,237 N Passing =18,105 N Passing =1,265 N Passing = 446 N Passing =51,819Class of 2002 N Tested = 96,431 N Tested =1,542 N Tested =1,764 N Tested =28,809 N Tested =2,495 N Tested = 601 N Tested =61,200

1999-00 N Passing = 78,260 N Passing =1,022 N Passing =1,366 N Passing =19,950 N Passing =1,615 N Passing = 547 N Passing =53,756Class of 2003 Membership=100,002 Membership=1,495 Membership=1,878 Membership=30,586 Membership=3,140 Membership= 731 Membership=62,164

2000-01 N Passing = 82,613 N Passing =1,121 N Passing =1,522 N Passing =21,334 N Passing =2,019 N Passing = 721 N Passing =55,896Class of 2004 Membership=102,252 Membership=1,561 Membership=1,967 Membership=30,597 Membership=3,911 Membership= 895 Membership=63,314




2004-05 N Passing =101,011 N Passing =1,434 N Passing =1,989 N Passing =27,842 N Passing =4,688 N Passing =1,822 N Passing =63,236Class of 2008 Membership=123,567 Membership=1,841 Membership=2,393 Membership=38,739 Membership=8,049 Membership=2,187 Membership=70,358

2005-06 N Passing = 98,228 N Passing =1,311 N Passing =1,930 N Passing =27,123 N Passing =5,224 N Passing = 2,008 N Passing =60,632Class of 2009 Membership=118,838 Membership=1,645 Membership=2,366 Membership=37,065 Membership=8,401 Membership= 2,393 Membership=66,968



Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.



for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011at End of Grade 9, by Ethnicity

78.3

68.4

65.2

81.9

73.2

82.0

77.1 83

.4

81.7

77.9 83

.1

71.9

58.2

83.3 89

.9

82.7

79.7

81.6

73.2

62.2

83.9 90

.5

66.6

77.8

61.5

56.5

77.6 86

.1

74.9 79

.6

70.4

68.3

82.5 88

.9

81.8

68.4

82.6

65.9

63.0

79.9 89

.6

76.6

62.1 70

.1

62.8

50.7

74.2

84.7

74.8

72.7

51.4

86.5

71.880

.8

77.4

69.7

51.6

80.6 88

.3

80.1

69.9 78

.6

68.4

53.1

81.0 88

.489

.8

81.9

55.0

71.9

79.6

90.6

56.0

71.0

83.5

75.3 80

.7

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

9

1998-99 N Passing = 64,166 N Passing = 749 N Passing =1,108 N Passing =15,652 N Passing = 993 N Passing = 302 N Passing =45,345Class of 2001 N Tested = 79,385 N Tested =1,077 N Tested =1,522 N Tested =22,636 N Tested =1,610 N Tested = 419 N Tested =52,092



2001-02 N Passing = 82,624 N Passing =1,039 N Passing =1,690 N Passing =21,717 N Passing =2,248 N Passing = 743 N Passing =55,168Class of 2004 Membership= 92,535 Membership=1,229 Membership=1,971 Membership=26,306 Membership=3,161 Membership= 837 Membership=59,000

2002-03 N Passing = 83,889 N Passing =1,112 N Passing =1,693 N Passing =22,125 N Passing =2,761 N Passing =1,024 N Passing =55,174Class of 2005 Membership= 93,033 Membership=1,268 Membership=1,915 Membership=26,533 Membership=3,819 Membership=1,141 Membership=58,357

2003-04 N Passing = 87,620 N Passing =1,124 N Passing =1,786 N Passing =23,446 N Passing =3,288 N Passing =1,208 N Passing =56,768Class of 2006 Membership= 97,208 Membership=1,277 Membership=2,040 Membership=28,122 Membership=4,471 Membership=1,338 Membership=59,960





Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.




for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 201080

.8

69.5 72.8

69.1

61.7 72

.1

87.0

86.8

80.6

80.6

77.3 85

.0 91.8

72.2

90.2

87.7

72.3

89.6

86.7

88.4

82.7

73.4

89.1 94

.4

90.2

87.2 90.2

83.4

77.7

89.7 94

.7

90.4

87.9

88.6

84.3

78.1

91.4 94.9

85.4 89

.8

81.4

80.4 89

.4 93.2

70.1

94.0

89.0

82.9

82.986

.289.9

93.5

88.8

71.182

.6

85.7

84.589

.3

94.5

89.7

83.488

.4 94.7

90.3

83.4

73.5

87.590.1

88.0

88.7

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

10

1999-00 N Passing =59,195 N Passing = 671 N Passing =1,137 N Passing =14,554 N Passing =1,011 N Passing = 291 N Passing =41,530Class of 2001 Membership=68,386 Membership= 822 Membership=1,398 Membership=18,699 Membership=1,380 Membership= 358 Membership=45,728

2000-01 N Passing =65,978 N Passing = 744 N Passing =1,374 N Passing =16,497 N Passing =1,388 N Passing = 488 N Passing =45,487Class of 2002 Membership=71,603 Membership= 830 Membership=1,551 Membership=18,969 Membership=1,669 Membership= 538 Membership=48,046

2001-02 N Passing =73,308 N Passing = 801 N Passing =1,456 N Passing =18,626 N Passing =1,814 N Passing = 624 N Passing = **Class of 2003 Membership=78,879 Membership= 860 Membership=1,633 Membership=21,103 Membership=2,226 Membership= 688 Membership=52,312

2002-03 N Passing =74,986 N Passing = 934 N Passing =1,585 N Passing =19,062 N Passing =2,150 N Passing = 769 N Passing = **Class of 2004 Membership=79,837 Membership=1,000 Membership=1,747 Membership=21,311 Membership=2,638 Membership= 816 Membership=52,325

2003-04 N Passing =77,921 N Passing = 953 N Passing =1,639 N Passing =20,350 N Passing =2,777 N Passing =1,020 N Passing = **Class of 2005 Membership=83,467 Membership=1,022 Membership=1,777 Membership=22,926 Membership=3,322 Membership=1,103 Membership=53,317

2004-05 N Passing =81,511 N Passing = 919 N Passing =1,730 N Passing =21,568 N Passing =3,238 N Passing =1,183 N Passing = **Class of 2006 Membership=87,660 Membership=1,002 Membership=1,939 Membership=24,398 Membership=3,861 Membership=1,282 Membership=55,178

2005-06 N Passing =81,648 N Passing = 930 N Passing = 1,857 N Passing = 21,481 N Passing = 3,519 N Passing = 1,332 N Passing = **Class of 2007 Membership=88,230 Membership= 1,023 Membership= 2,046 Membership= 24,628 Membership= 4,184 Membership= 1,435 Membership= 54,914

2006-07 N Passing =87,005 N Passing =1,083 N Passing =1,963 N Passing =23,666 N Passing =4,272 N Passing =1,607 N Passing = **Class of 2008 Membership=93,903 Membership=1,188 Membership=2,162 Membership=26,796 Membership=5,029 Membership=1,740 Membership=56,988

2007-08 N Passing =87,605 N Passing =1,104 N Passing =1,991 N Passing =23,560 N Passing =4,892 N Passing =1,826 N Passing = **Class of 2009 Membership=94,149 Membership=1,190 Membership=2,194 Membership=26,391 Membership=5,625 Membership=1,971 Membership=56,778

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.




for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 200986

.6

81.6

81.3

77.8

73.3 81

.3

90.8

92.1

89.6

88.6

87.0 90

.7 94.7

93.1

81.5

90.7 94

.2

83.6

93.0

91.7

89.2

88.4

83.9

92.3

92.5

90.9

90.8

87.2

84.1

92.8

92.7

91.2

90.8

88.3

84.9 92

.4

93.0

92.8

90.7

89.3

87.0 92

.6

83.2

90.7

88.3

89.2 >=

95.0

92.9

>=95

.0

81.5

89.4

93.4

93.9

>=95

.0

92.5

88.892

.2

93.2

93.4

>=95

.0>=

95.0

>=95

.0>=

95.0

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

11


Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficency Standard, 2007-08


for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008

1 2

2000-01 N Passing =59,653 N Passing =707 N Passing =1,278 N Passing =15,513 N Passing =1,156 N Passing =347 N Passing =40,652Class of 2001 Membership=64,516 Membership=779 Membership=1,391 Membership=17,570 Membership=1,314 Membership=378 Membership=43,084

2001-02 N Passing =67,064 N Passing =786 N Passing =1,445 N Passing =17,283 N Passing =1,562 N Passing =497 N Passing =45,449Class of 2002 Membership=70,821 Membership=828 Membership=1,545 Membership=18,849 Membership=1,701 Membership=535 Membership=47,315

2002-03 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing =18,813 N Passing =2,011 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** Class of 2003 Membership=74,702 Membership=810 Membership=1,589 Membership=20,081 Membership=2,165 Membership=682 Membership=49,375

2003-04 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing =19,631 N Passing =2,436 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2004 Membership=77,030 Membership=957 Membership=1,716 Membership=21,091 Membership=2,615 Membership=811 Membership=49,840

2004-05 N Passing =76,106 N Passing = ** N Passing =1,666 N Passing =20,529 N Passing =2,922 N Passing = 985 N Passing = **Class of 2005 Membership=80,376 Membership=943 Membership=1,757 Membership=22,555 Membership=3,236 Membership=1,043 Membership=50,842

2005-06 N Passing = ** N Passing = 820 N Passing = ** N Passing = 20,182 N Passing = 3,191 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2006 Membership=77,592 Membership= 868 Membership= 1,761 Membership= 21,898 Membership= 3,362 Membership=1,117 Membership=48,586

2006-07 N Passing = ** N Passing = 894 N Passing = ** N Passing = 21,300 N Passing =3,533 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2007 Membership=81,744 Membership= 961 Membership= 1,922 Membership= 23,052 Membership= 3,795 Membership=1,334 Membership=50,680

2007-08 N Passing = ** N Passing = 1,012 N Passing = ** N Passing = 22,176 N Passing =4,146 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2008 Membership=84,858 Membership=1,068 Membership= 2,011 Membership= 23,914 Membership= 4,448 Membership=1,620 Membership=51,797

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, erformance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

88.3

88.091

.7

91.8

93.7

92.9

93.1

93.2

94.8

91.0

90.3 94

.4

94.5

92.2 94.9

93.0

92.4

93.1

94.8

92.7

93.2

94.4

91.8

91.9

90.892

.5 96.1

92.9

93.5

94.9

94.7

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

94.7

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0>=

95.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08



for the Class of 2008, Across Years, by Ethnicity

2003-04 N Passing = 88,350 N Passing =1,199 N Passing =1,839 N Passing =22,449 N Passing =3,682 N Passing =1,561 N Passing =57,620(In Grade 8) Membership=109,304 Membership=1,550 Membership=2,115 Membership=33,016 Membership=6,068 Membership=1,878 Membership=64,677

2004-05 N Passing = 101,011 N Passing =1,434 N Passing =1,989 N Passing =27,842 N Passing =4,688 N Passing =1,822 N Passing =63,236(In Grade 9) Membership= 123,567 Membership=1,841 Membership=2,393 Membership=38,739 Membership=8,049 Membership=2,187 Membership=70,358

2005-06 N Passing = 90,509 N Passing =1,159 N Passing =1,965 N Passing =24,525 N Passing =4,294 N Passing = 1,650 N Passing = 56,916(In Grade 10) Membership= 100,376 Membership=1,329 Membership=2,178 Membership=29,412 Membership=5,527 Membership= 1,839 Membership= 60,091

2006-07 N Passing = 87,005 N Passing = 1,083 N Passing = 1,963 N Passing = 23,666 N Passing = 4,272 N Passing = 1,607 N Passing = **(In Grade 11) Membership= 93,903 Membership= 1,188 Membership= 2,162 Membership= 26,796 Membership= 5,029 Membership= 1,740 Membership= 56,988

2007-08 N Passing = ** N Passing = 1,012 N Passing = ** N Passing =22,176 N Passing =4,146 N Passing = ** N Passing = **(In Grade 12) Membership= 84,858 Membership= 1,068 Membership =2,011 Membership=23,914 Membership=4,448 Membership=1,620 Membership=51,797Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

80.8

77.4

87.0

68.0

60.7

83.1 89

.1

81.7

77.9 83

.1

71.9

58.2

83.3 89

.9

90.2

87.2 90

.2

83.4

77.7

89.7 94

.7

93.0 95.0

92.4

93.1 95.0

94.8

92.7

93.2 >=95

.0

95.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

13




14

2004-05 N Passing = 88,679 N Passing =1,225 N Passing =1,725 N Passing =23,025 N Passing =4,342 N Passing =1,809 N Passing =56,553(In Grade 8) Membership=109,678 Membership =1,569 Membership =2,075 Membership =33,220 Membership =6,944 Membership =2,204 Membership =63,666

2005-06 N Passing = 98,228 N Passing = 1,311 N Passing = 1,930 N Passing = 27,123 N Passing = 5,224 N Passing = 2,008 N Passing = 60,632(In Grade 9) Membership= 118,838 Membership = 1,645 Membership = 2,366 Membership = 37,065 Membership = 8,401 Membership = 2,393 Membership = 66,968

2006-07 N Passing = 93,665 N Passing = 1,143 N Passing = 2,003 N Passing =25,513 N Passing = 5,076 N Passing = 1,986 N Passing = 57,944(In Grade 10) Membership= 103,565 Membership = 1,301 Membership = 2,260 Membership =30,281 Membership = 6,502 Membership = 2,173 Membership = 61,048

2007-08 N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = 1,104 N Passing = 1,991 N Passing =23,560 N Passing = 4,892 N Passing = 1,826 N Passing = **(In Grade 11) Membership= 94,109 Membership = 1,190 Membership = 2,194 Membership =26,391 Membership = 5,625 Membership = 1,971 Membership = 56,778

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Beginning in 2004-05, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance dta that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

80.9 78.183.1

69.3

82.182.7 79.7 81.673.2

62.2

83.990.590.4 87.9 88.6

84.378.1

91.4 94.992.8 89.3 87.0

62.5

88.8>=95.092.690.793.0

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standards, 2007-08



2005-06 N Passing = 72,643 N Passing = 915 N Passing = 1,758 N Passing = 14,789 N Passing = 3,789 N Passing = 1,705 N Passing = 49,687(In Grade 8) Membership = 111,004 Membership = 1,627 Membership = 2,242 Membership = 33,648 Membership = 7,941 Membership = 2,464 Membership = 63,082

2006-07 N Passing = 93,800 N Passing = 1,195 N Passing = 2,008 N Passing = 24,450 N Passing =5,567 N Passing = 2,164 N Passing = 58,416(In Grade 9) Membership = 124,572 Membership = 1,793 Membership = 2,580 Membership = 39,741 Membership =9,859 Membership = 2,788 Membership = 67,811

2007-08 N Passing = 91,638 N Passing = 1,192 N Passing = 2,159 N Passing = 24,133 N Passing =5,695 N Passing = 2,124 N Passing = 56,335(In Grade 10) Membership = 103,346 Membership = 1,396 Membership = 2,404 Membership = 29,660 Membership =7,080 Membership = 2,376 Membership = 60,430

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

65.456.2

78.4

44.0 47.7

69.278.875.3

66.6

77.8

61.556.5

77.686.185.4

89.881.4 80.4

89.4 93.288.7

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

15




2006-07 N Passing = 87,588 N Passing =1,135 N Passing =2,002 N Passing =21,443 N Passing =5,557 N Passing =2,288 N Passing =55,163(In Grade 8) Membership=111,030 Membership =1,573 Membership =2,341 Membership =33,362 Membership =8,746 Membership =2,790 Membership =62,218

2007-08 N Passing = 102,595 N Passing =1,355 N Passing =2,264 N Passing =28,149 N Passing = 7,671 N Passing =2,656 N Passing =60,500(In Grade 9) Membership=127,125 Membership =1,808 Membership =2,846 Membership =39,994 Membership =11,239 Membership =3,219 Membership =68,019


78.972.2

85.5

64.3 63.5

82.088.7

80.774.9

79.670.4 68.3

82.588.9

0102030405060708090

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2006-07 2007-08

16


Figure 12. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing the Standard*


2007-08 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing =1,190 N Passing =2,283 N Passing =23,349 N Passing = 7,172 N Passing =2,749 N Passing =55,783(In Grade 8) Membership=112,824 Membership =1,641 Membership =2,588 Membership =33,316 Membership =10,086 Membership =3,214 Membership =61,979


82.072.5

88.2

70.1 71.1

85.5 90.0

0

20

40

60

80

100


Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2007-08

17


18


for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 at End of Grade 8, by Gender

1997-98 N Passing = 70,480 N Passing =36,364 N Passing =33,861Class of 2002 N Tested = 90,906 N Tested =44,615 N Tested =45,883

1998-99 N Passing = 71,457 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** Class of 2003 N Tested = 95,377 N Tested = ** N Tested = **

1999-00 N Passing = 69,080 N Passing =35,754 N Passing =33,326Class of 2004 Membership= 94,620 Membership=46,450 Membership=48,170


2001-02 N Passing = 81,274 N Passing =42,026 N Passing =39,244Class of 2006 Membership=102,532 Membership=50,566 Membership=51,956




2005-06 N Passing = 72,643 N Passing = 37,724 N Passing =34,919Class of 2010 Membership= 111,004 Membership= 54,414 Membership=56,590

2006-07 N Passing = 87,588 N Passing = 44,865 N Passing =42,723Class of 2011 Membership=111,030 Membership=54,261 Membership=56,769


Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. **Data by gender were not collected from LEAs in 1998-99. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

77.5 81

.5

73.874.9

73.0 75

.9

71.7

80.2

79.3 83

.1

75.5

84.1

76.980

.8 84.7

77.284

.7

77.2

65.4 69

.3

61.7

78.9 82

.7

75.3

69.2 77

.080.4

80.9

79.085

.2

82.0

0102030405060708090

100

State Female Male

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

****

19


Figure 14. 1997-98 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing the Standard* for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003,

2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009,2010, and 2011 at End of Grade 9, by Gender

1997-98 N Passing = 71,204 N Passing =36,608 N Passing =34,212Class of 2001 N Tested = 87,061 N Tested =42,847 Membership=43,716

1998-99 N Passing = 73,839 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2002 N Tested = 96,431 N Tested = ** N Tested = **






2004-05 N Passing =101,011 N Passing =50,199 N Passing =50,812Class of 2008 Membership=123,567 Membership=58,903 Membership=64,664

2005-06 N Passing = 98,228 N Passing =49,241 N Passing = 48,987Class of 2009 Membership= 118,838 Membership=57,374 Membership= 61,464

2006-07 N Passing = 93,800 N Passing = 47,266 N Passing =46,534Class of 2010 Membership=124,572 Membership =59,690 Membership=64,882

2007-08 N Passing = 102,595 N Passing = 50,522 N Passing =52,073Class of 2011 Membership= 127,125 Membership =60,411 Membership=66,714

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. **Data by gender were not collected from LEAs in 1998-99. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

85.4

78.3

78.3 81

.8

74.977

.6 84.2

80.1 83

.8

76.681

.9

78.6

78.681

.7 85.2

78.682

.7 85.8

79.7

75.3 79

.2

71.781

.8 76.6 80

.8 85.4

82.0 85

.6

78.183

.6

80.7

0102030405060708090

100

State Female Male

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

** **

1998-99 N Passing = 64,166 N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2001 N Tested = 79,385 N Tested = ** N Tested = **

1999-00 N Passing = 69,474 N Passing =35,590 N Passing =33,883Class of 2002 N Tested = 80,054 N Tested =40,068 N Tested =39,984









Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Students who began grade 8 1996-9 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum.

Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. 1999-00 and beyond data use membership as the denominator rather than total number tested as was used in previous years. **Data by gender were not collected from LEAs in 1998-99. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

20



for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 at End of Grade 10, by Gender

80.8 86

.8 88.8

84.789

.9

88.1 91

.7

89.3 91

.1

87.590

.2 91.8

88.5

88.489

.6 91.3

87.890

.2 91.8

88.590

.4 92.1

88.8

88.7 90.1

87.291

.9

90.1

0102030405060708090

100

State Female Male

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

****



2001-02 N Passing =73,308 N Passing =37,650 N Passing =35,656 Class of 2003 Membership=78,879 Membership=40,087 Membership=38,789







Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

21



for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 at End of Grade 11, by Gender

86.6

88.8

84.390

. 8

93. 4

92.9

93.9

91.9

94.8

93.0

93.4

94.3

92.4

93.0

94.1

91.8

92.5

93.7

91.4

92.7

93.8

91.5

93.0

94.1

92.0

9

2.1

93.9

0102030405060708090

100

State Female Male

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


2001-02 N Passing =67,064 N Passing = ** N Passing =32,308 Class of 2002 Membership=70,821 Membership=36,337 Membership=34,483

2002-03 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = **Class of 2003 Membership=74,702 Membership=38,363 Membership=36,339


2004-05 N Passing =76,106 N Passing = ** N Passing =36,856Class of 2005 Membership=80,376 Membership=41,056 Membership=39,320


2006-07 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing =37,611Class of 2007 Membership=81,744 Membership=42,043 Membership=39,701

2007-08 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing =39,530Class of 2008 Membership=84,858 Membership=43,075 Membership=41,783

**Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

22

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.



for the Classes of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, at End of Grade 12, by Gender

92.5

90.8 94

.0

94.7

93.7

94.7

93.7

94.7

94.6

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

>=95

.00

102030405060708090

100

State Female Male

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


Number Tested1 % TestedAll Students 10 100.0% (40.0% Proficient)

GenderFemale 3 30.0Male 7 70.0

Grade8 9 90.09 1 10.0

EthnicityAmerican Indian 1 10.0Hispanic 1 10.0Multi-Racial 2 20.0White 5 50.0

Economically DisadvantagedYes 7 70.0No 3 30.0

Students with DisabilitiesAutism 2 20.0Intellectual Disability-Mild 3 30.0Specific Learning Disability 3 30.0Other Health Impaired 1 10.0Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 1 10.0

Notes: 1"Number Tested" is the number of students who took the computer skills alternate assessment test. Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilities (CECAS). Data received from LEAs and charter schools September 15, 2008 are not included in this table.

Table 6. North Carolina Testing ProgramStatewide Computer Skills Alternate Assessment,

2007-08


Category

23


Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12

CategoryMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficient

Member-ship

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

Member-ship

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

Member-ship

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

Member-ship

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

All Students 112,824 92,526 82.0 127,125 102,595 80.7 103,346 91,638 88.7 94,149 87,605 93.0 84,858 * >=95%Academically/Intellectually Gifted 17,291 * >=95% 13,627 * >=95% 12,729 * >=95% 10,501 * >=95% 1,382 * >=95% AIG - Reading 13,874 * >=95% 11,523 * >=95% 10,885 * >=95% 8,970 * >=95% 1,217 * >=95% AIG - Mathematics 14,714 * >=95% 11,908 * >=95% 11,179 * >=95% 8,856 * >=95% 1,163 * >=95%Economically Disadvantaged 51,118 36,850 72.1 54,654 39,773 72.8 37,032 30,764 83.1 30,137 26,885 89.2 24,453 22,524 92.1Not Economically Disadvantaged 61,706 55,676 90.2 72,471 62,822 86.7 66,314 60,874 91.8 64,012 60,720 94.9 60,405 * >=95%Title I 16,497 12,673 76.8 4,266 2,946 69.1 3,231 2,680 82.9 2,984 2,678 89.7 2,699 2,510 93.0Not Title I 96,327 79,853 82.9 122,859 99,649 81.1 100,115 88,958 88.9 91,165 84,927 93.2 82,159 * >=95%Schoolwide Title I 15,982 12,323 77.1 4,177 2,907 69.6 3,175 2,643 83.2 2,958 2,663 90.0 2,684 2,496 93.0Targeted Assistance 452 317 70.1 15 9 60.0 0 * * 0 * * 0 * *Migrant 89 47 52.8 82 37 45.1 59 40 67.8 28 16 57.1 15 14 93.3Not Migrant 112,735 92,479 82.0 127,043 102,558 80.7 103,287 91,598 88.7 94,121 87,589 93.1 84,843 * >=95%Limited English Proficient (LEP) 6,037 3,549 58.8 6,695 3,571 53.3 3,783 2,633 69.6 2,839 2,226 78.4 2,076 1,881 90.6Not Limited English Proficient 106,787 88,977 83.3 120,430 99,024 82.2 99,563 89,005 89.4 91,310 85,379 93.5 82,782 * >=95%All Students with Disabilities2 16,191 9,111 56.3 16,389 9,598 58.6 11,582 7,883 68.1 9,857 7,260 73.7 7,992 5,924 74.1Students without Disabilities 96,633 83,415 86.3 110,736 92,997 84.0 91,764 83,755 91.3 84,292 * >=95% 76,866 * >=95%Autism 621 252 40.6 538 224 41.6 480 226 47.1 429 195 45.5 346 132 38.2Deaf-Blindness 1 * * 3 * * 2 * * 2 * * 3 * *Deafness 0 * * 1 * * 1 * * 1 * * 2 * *Serious Emotional Disability 1,054 517 49.1 1,438 698 48.5 697 440 63.1 425 321 75.5 288 235 81.6Hearing Impairment 151 87 57.6 155 98 63.2 124 87 70.2 117 94 80.3 94 81 86.2Intellectual Disability-Mild 1,909 451 23.6 2,236 642 28.7 1,691 534 31.6 1,543 624 40.4 1,379 617 44.7Intellectual Disability- Moderate 355 * <=5% 398 * <=5% 284 26 9.2 398 59 14.8 420 49 11.7Intellectual Disability-Severe 56 * <=5% 71 5 7.0 35 2 5.7 78 7 9.0 98 11 11.2Specific Learning Disability 6,163 3,887 63.1 7,068 4,918 69.6 5,013 4,063 81.0 4,206 3,779 89.8 3,566 3,327 93.3

Learning Disabled-Reading 4,009 2,531 63.1 1,150 572 49.7 437 258 59.0 68 35 51.5 27 20 74.1Learning Disabled-Mathematics 2,553 1,495 58.6 692 335 48.4 294 176 59.9 52 32 61.5 27 20 74.1Learning Disabled-Written Expression 2,999 1,904 63.5 866 421 48.6 338 199 58.9 61 33 54.1 24 19 79.2Learning Disabled-Other 199 131 65.8 96 46 47.9 36 21 58.3 8 4 50.0 2 * *Multiple Disabilities 153 * <=5% 190 10 5.3 111 * <=5% 202 29 14.4 177 17 9.6Other Health Impairment 3,116 1,863 59.8 3,316 2,214 66.8 2,191 1,674 76.4 1,715 1,472 85.8 1,315 1,195 90.9Orthopedic Impairment 57 39 68.4 87 55 63.2 71 51 71.8 67 56 83.6 58 35 60.3Speech or Language Impairment 236 159 67.4 122 72 59.0 74 54 73.0 48 41 85.4 32 30 93.8Traumatic Brain Injury 37 16 43.2 52 20 38.5 47 29 61.7 46 31 67.4 61 48 78.7Visual Impairment incl. Blindness 48 29 60.4 49 29 59.2 47 32 68.1 36 31 86.1 41 36 87.8Section 504 2,234 1,796 80.4 665 595 89.5 714 661 92.6 544 * >=95% 112 * >=95%

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Some variables were merged from external data sources with the data 2The total for "All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.. "Membership" and "Number Passing" totals for "All Students with Disabilities" data include all students with answer sheets coded as having a disability. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Due to the challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilities (CECAS). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section

Table 7. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing the Standard1

Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students,Across Grades 8 - 12

24


Grade 8 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing = 9,111Membership = 112,824 Membership = 16,191




Grade 12 N Passing = ** N Passing = 5,924Membership = 84,858 Membership = 7,992

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Due to the challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Figure 18. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Performance of Students with Disabilities, Grades 8 - 12Percent Passing the Standard*

82.0

56.3

80.7

58.6

88.7

68.1

93.0

73.7 74.1

>=95.0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

State Students with Disabilities

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade11 Grade12

25


AU- Autism DB- Deaf-Blindness DF- Deafness ED- Serious Emotional Disability HI - Hearing ImpairmentIDMI - Intellectual Disability - Mild IDMO - Intellectual Disability - Moderate IDSE - Intellectual Disability - Severe LD - Specific Learning Disability

Grade 8 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing = 9,111 N Passing = 252 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = 517 N Passing = 87 N Passing = 451 N Passing =** N Passing =** N Passing =3,887Membership=112,824 Membership=16,191 Membership= 621 Membership=1 Membership=0 Membership=1,054 Membership=151 Membership=1,909 Membership=355 Membership=56 Membership=6,613

Grade 9 N Passing =102,595 N Passing = 9,598 N Passing = 224 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = 698 N Passing = 98 N Passing = 642 N Passing =** N Passing = 5 N Passing =4,918Membership=127,125 Membership=16,389 Membership= 538 Membership=3 Membership=1 Membership=1,438 Membership=155 Membership=2,236 Membership=398 Membership=71 Membership=7,068

Grade 10 N Passing = 91,638 N Passing = 7,883 N Passing = 226 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = 440 N Passing = 87 N Passing = 534 N Passing =26 N Passing = 2 N Passing =4,063Membership=103,346 Membership=11,582 Membership= 480 Membership=2 Membership=1 Membership= 697 Membership=124 Membership=1,691 Membership=284 Membership=35 Membership=5,013

Grade 11 N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = 7,260 N Passing = 195 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = 321 N Passing = 94 N Passing = 624 N Passing =59 N Passing = 7 N Passing =3,779Membership= 94,149 Membership= 9,857 Membership= 429 Membership=2 Membership=1 Membership= 425 Membership=117 Membership= 1,543 Membership=398 Membership=78 Membership=4,206

Grade 12 N Passing = ** N Passing = 5,924 N Passing = 132 N Passing = ** N Passing = ** N Passing = 235 N Passing = 81 N Passing = 617 N Passing =49 N Passing =11 N Passing =3,327Membership= 84,858 Membership= 7,992 Membership= 346 Membership=3 Membership=2 Membership= 288 Membership= 94 Membership= 1,379 Membership=420 Membership=98 Membership=3,566

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilties (CECAS). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Performance of Students with Disabilities, by Classification, Grades 8 - 12

26

63.1

7.0

69.6

88.7

31.6

5.7

81.0

73.7

40.4

14.8

9.0

89.8

38.2

81.6

93.3

82.0

56.3

40.6

** **

49.1 57

.6

23.6

<=5.

0

<=5.

0

28.7

80.7

58.6

41.6

** **

48.5

63.2

<=5.

0

68.1

47.1

** **

63.1 70

.2

9.2

93.0

45.5

** **

75.5 80

.3

**

>=95

.0

74.1

**

86.2

44.7

11.7

11.2

0102030405060708090

100

State All Students withDisabilities

AU DB DF ED HI IDMI IDMO IDSE LD

Perc

ent P

assi

ng



MU - Multiple Disabilities DF- Deafness OI - Orthopedic IOH - Other Health Im SI- Speech or Language ImpairmentTB - Traumatic Brain Injury VI - Visual Impairmen504- Section 504

Grade 8 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing = 9,111 N Passing = ** N Passing = 1,863 N Passing = 39 N Passing = 159 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 29 N Passing = 1,796Membership=112,824 Membership =16,191 Membership =153 Membership =3,116 Membership =57 Membership =236 Membership =37 Membership =48 Membership =2,234

Grade 9 N Passing = 102,595 N Passing = 9,598 N Passing = 10 N Passing = 2,214 N Passing = 55 N Passing = 72 N Passing = 20 N Passing = 29 N Passing = 595Membership=127,125 Membership =16,389 Membership =190 Membership =3,316 Membership =87 Membership =122 Membership =52 Membership =49 Membership =665

Grade 10 N Passing = 91,638 N Passing = 7,883 N Passing = ** N Passing = 1,674 N Passing = 51 N Passing = 54 N Passing = 29 N Passing = 32 N Passing = 661Membership=103,346 Membership =11,582 Membership =111 Membership =2,191 Membership =71 Membership =74 Membership =47 Membership =47 Membership =714

Grade 11 N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = 7,260 N Passing = 29 N Passing = 1,472 N Passing = 56 N Passing = 41 N Passing = 31 N Passing = 31 N Passing = **Membership=94,149 Membership = 9,857 Membership =202 Membership =1,715 Membership =67 Membership =48 Membership =46 Membership =36 Membership =544

Grade 12 N Passing = ** N Passing = 5,924 N Passing = 17 N Passing = 1,195 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 30 N Passing = 48 N Passing = 36 N Passing = **Membership=84,858 Membership = 7,992 Membership =177 Membership =1,315 Membership =58 Membership =32 Membership =61 Membership =41 Membership =112

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilties (CECAS). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Performance of Students with Disabilities, by Classification, Grades 8 - 12 (continued)

27

82.0

56.3 59

.8

80.4

5.3

66.8

89.5

88.7

76.4

73.7

14.4

85.8 90

.9 93.8

87.8

<=5.

0

43.2

68.4

67.4

60.4

38.5

58.6

80.7

59.263.2

59.0 61

.768.1 71.8

68.1

92.6

<=5.

0

73.0

85.4

93.0

83.6

>=95

.0

67.4

86.1

78.7

9.6

60.3

74.1

>=95

.0

>=95

.0

0102030405060708090

100

State All Students withDisabililties

MU OH OI SI TB VI 504

Perc

ent P

assi

ng




Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, Grades 8 - 12

Grade 8 N Passing = 92,526 N Passing = 3,549Membership=112,824 Membership =6,037



Grade 11 N Passing = 87,605 N Passing = 2,226Membership= 94,149 Membership =2,839

Grade 12 N Passing = ** N Passing = 1,881Membership= 84,858 Membership =2,076

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

82.0

58.8

80.7

53.3

88.7

69.6

93.0

78.4

90.6>=95.0

0102030405060708090

100

State Limited English Proficient Students

Perc

ent P

assi

ng


28


Figure 21. 2003-04 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing the Standard*

by Category, for the Class of 2008, at End of Grades 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12

Percent Passing the Standard Categories

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Percent passing categories may not sum to 100.0% due to rounding. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

90% or above

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

Below 50%

End of Grade 8

18.9%

7.1%2.4% 4.1%

30.2%

37.3%

End of Grade 9

6.3%1.4%

4.9%

28.7%

44.1%

14.7%

End of Grade 10

65.2%

24.6%

3.0%

0.0%

3.0%

End of Grade 11

2.2%1.5%

9.5%

0.7%

86.1%

End of Grade 12

84.7%

1.5%

12.4%

1.5%

29



by Category, for the Class of 2009, at End of Grades 8, 9,10, and 11


Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Percent passing categories may not sum to 100.0% due to rounding. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested onn the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

90% or above

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%Below 50%

End of Grade 8

6.4%1.8%

6.4%

25.1%

40 9%

19.3%

End of Grade 9

6.9%1.4%

4.9%

11.1%

51.4%

24.3%

End of Grade 10

1.4%1.4%

70.2%

22.7%

1.4%

2.8%

End of Grade 11

2.8%1.4%

18.4%

75.9%

0.7%0.7%

30



by Category, for the Class of 2010, at End of Grades 8, 9 and 10


Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Percent passing categories may not sum to 100.0% due to rounding. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

90% or above

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

Below 50%

End of Grade 8

19.0%

12.3%

12.8%

8.4%

25.7%

21.8%

End of Grade 9

4.8%

28.8%

32.2%

17.8%8.2%

8.2%

End of Grade 10

4.9% 1.4%

56.9%

25.7%

11.1%

31

8 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard, 2007-0


by Category, for the Class of 2011, at End of Grade 8 and 9


Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Percent passing categories may not sum to 100.0% due to rounding. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

90% or above

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

Below 50%

End of Grade 8

3.3%

6.6%

9.3%

26.2%

33.3%

21.3%

End of Grade 9

17.9%

42.1%

22.8%

7.6%

6.2%

3.4%

32


Figure 25. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing the Standard*

by Category, for the Class of 2012, at End of Grade 8


Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Percent passing categories may not sum to 100.0% due to rounding. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

90% or above

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

Below 50%

End of Grade 8

3.8%2.2%

8.7%

33.3%

32.8%

19.1%

33


Crosscreek Charter School** Alexander JohnstonGrandfather Academy** Alleghany Kinston Charter Academy**Laurinburg Homework** Avery LincolnOmuteko Gwamaziima** Bridges** Maureen Joy**

Brunswick McDowellBuncombe Millennium**Cabarrus Mitchell

Academy of Moore County** Hertford Caldwell MontgomeryAnson Kennedy Charter** Caswell MooreBrevard Academy** Lexington City Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Mooresville CityC.G. Woodson** Chatham New Hanover

Clay Newton-Conover CityCleveland OnslowClinton City Orange

Bertie PreEminent** Columbus Orange Charter**Bladen Provisions Academy** Craven PenderCrossnore Academy** Richmond Cumberland RandolphEdgecombe Robeson Dare River Mill Academy**Healthy Start** S.B. Howard** Davidson Roanoke Rapids CityJones STARS** Edenton/Chowan RockinghamLenoir Swain Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Rocky Mount Prep Sch**Pitt Washington Gates Rowan-Salisbury

Granville RutherfordHarnett ScotlandHaywood Stokes

Alamance-Burlington Kestrel Heights** Henderson Success Institute**Asheboro City Lee Hickory City UnionAsheville City Macon Hoke WakeBeaufort Madison Iredell-Statesville Weldon CityCharlotte/Mecklenburg Martin Jackson Whiteville CityCurrituck Nash-Rocky MountDowntown Middle** NorthamptonDuplin PersonDurham Research Triangle** American Ren. Middle** Metrolina**East Wake Academy** Sampson Arapahoe Charter** Mount Airy CityFranklin Thomasville City ArtSpace Charter** Mountain Community**Gaston Two Rivers Community School** Ashe Mountain Discovery**Greene Vance Bethany Community** PamlicoGuilford Warren Burke PerquimansGuilford Prep Academy** Wayne CIS Academy** Piedmont Community**Halifax Wilson Camden PolkHyde Winston-Salem/Forsyth Cape Fear Center** Quality Education**Kannapolis City Carolina International** Queen's Grant**

Carter Community** Quest Academy**Carteret Roxboro Community**Catawba SPARC Academy**Charter Day School** StanlyChatham Charter** Sterling Montessori**Cherokee County Sugar Creek**Clover Garden** Summit Charter**Davie SurryElkin City The Learning Center**Evergreen Community** Thomas Jefferson**Exploris** TransylvaniaF Delany New School** TyrrellForsyth Academies** Union Academy**Franklin Academy** Vance Charter**Gaston College Prep** Washington Montessori**Graham WataugaGreensboro Academy** WilkesHaliwa-Saponi Tribal** Woods Charter**Lake Norman** YadkinLincoln Charter** YanceyMagellan**

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table.


34

N=35

Table 8. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing the Standard* by Range

for the Class of 2012, at End of Grade 8, by LEA

Below 50%

90% or aboveN=61

N=4 80-89%

N=60

50-59%N=7

60-69%N=16

70-79%


Beaufort Laurinburg Homework** Alleghany JonesCape Lookout Marine** Martin Asheboro City LincolnCrossnore Academy** Provisions Academy** Buncombe MaconCrossroads Charter** Quality Education** Cabarrus MadisonKennedy Charter** Caldwell McDowell

Caswell MitchellChapel Hill-Carrboro City Mooresville CityChatham Nash-Rocky Mount

Bertie Pace Academy** Clay New HanoverDurham Vance Cleveland Newton-Conover CityHertford Columbus Onslow

Community Partners High** PamlicoCraven PenderCumberland Perquimans

Anson Lexington City Currituck PersonBladen Pitt Dare RandolphC.G. Woodson** Robeson Davidson RichmondGreene Rutherford Duplin Roanoke Rapids CityHarnett Warren East Wake Academy** RockinghamLenoir Franklin Rowan-Salisbury

Gaston SampsonGates ScotlandGranville Stokes

Alamance-Burlington Lee Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** TransylvaniaAsheville City Montgomery Haywood TyrrellCarolina International** New Century Charter** Henderson WakeCharlotte/Mecklenburg Northampton Hoke WataugaClover Garden** Orange Hyde WayneEdgecombe River Mill Academy** Iredell-Statesville WilsonElizabeth City/Pasquotank Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Jackson Winston-Salem/ForsythGuilford Swain JohnstonHalifax Thomasville CityHickory City UnionKannapolis City WashingtonKestrel Heights** Weldon City Alexander Lincoln Charter**Lake Norman** Whiteville City Ashe Moore

Avery Mount Airy CityBrunswick Piedmont Community**Burke PolkCamden Queen's Grant**Carteret Raleigh Charter HS**Catawba Roxboro Community**Cherokee County StanlyClinton City SurryDavie Thomas Jefferson**Edenton/Chowan Union Academy**Elkin City WilkesFranklin Academy** Woods Charter**Gaston College Prep** YadkinGraham YanceyGray Stone Day**

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school

name can be found in the Appendix. Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section



N=61Below 50% 80-89%

N=9

50-59%

N=26

90% or aboveN=33

N=5

60-69%N=11

70-79%

35


Crossroads Charter** Kennedy Charter** Alexander Kannapolis CityAlleghany LincolnAshe Lincoln Charter**Asheboro City Macon

C.G. Woodson** Provisions Academy** Avery MadisonCrossnore Academy** Rutherford Brunswick McDowellDurham Vance Buncombe MitchellLaurinburg Homework** Burke Moore

Cabarrus Mooresville CityCaldwell Mount Airy CityCamden New Century Charter**

Anson Hertford Carolina International** New HanoverBertie Hickory City Carteret OnslowBladen Kestrel Heights** Catawba PamlicoCape Lookout Marine** Martin Chapel Hill-Carrboro City PerquimansCaswell Pace Academy** Cherokee County PersonEast Wake Academy** River Mill Academy** Clay Piedmont Community**Greene Washington Cleveland PolkGuilford Whiteville City Clinton City Raleigh Charter HS**

Clover Garden** RandolphCommunity Partners High** RichmondCraven Roanoke Rapids City

Alamance-Burlington Montgomery Cumberland RockinghamAsheville City Nash-Rocky Mount Dare Rocky Mount Prep Sch**Beaufort Newton-Conover City Davidson Rowan-SalisburyCharlotte/Mecklenburg Northampton Davie Roxboro Community**Chatham Orange Duplin SampsonColumbus Pender Edenton/Chowan StanlyCurrituck Pitt Elkin City StokesEdgecombe Quality Education** Franklin SurryElizabeth City/Pasquotank Queen's Grant** Franklin Academy** Thomas Jefferson**Gaston College Prep** Robeson Gaston TransylvaniaHalifax Scotland Gates TyrrellHaliwa-Saponi Tribal** Swain Graham Union Academy**Harnett Thomasville City Granville WakeHenderson Union Gray Stone Day** Weldon CityHyde Warren Haywood WilkesJones Watauga Hoke Winston-Salem/ForsythLee Wayne Iredell-Statesville Woods Charter**Lenoir Wilson Jackson YadkinLexington City Johnston Yancey

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name

can be found in the Appendix. Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

N=37 80-89%

N=82N=2

N=760-69%

70-79%N=16

90% or above



50-59%

36


Cape Lookout Marine** Alexander Franklin PenderAlleghany Franklin Academy** PersonAshe Gaston Piedmont Community**Asheboro City Gaston College Prep** Pitt

Laurinburg Homework** Asheville City Gates PolkAvery Graham Raleigh Charter HS**Bladen Granville RandolphBrunswick Gray Stone Day** Richmond

New Century Charter** Pace Academy** Buncombe Greene River Mill Academy**Burke Halifax Roanoke Rapids CityCabarrus Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** RobesonCaldwell Haywood Rockingham

Hertford Provisions Academy** Camden Henderson Rowan-SalisburyKennedy Charter** Vance Carteret Hickory City Roxboro Community**

Caswell Hoke SampsonCatawba Iredell-Statesville ScotlandChapel Hill-Carrboro City Jackson Stanly

Alamance-Burlington Jones Charlotte/Mecklenburg Johnston StokesAnson Lee Chatham Kannapolis City SurryBeaufort Lexington City Cherokee County Kestrel Heights** SwainBertie Martin Clay Lenoir Thomas Jefferson**C.G. Woodson** Newton-Conover City Cleveland Lincoln Thomasville CityColumbus Northampton Clinton City Lincoln Charter** TransylvaniaCrossnore Academy** Perquimans Clover Garden** Macon UnionCrossroads Charter** Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Community Partners High** Madison WakeDurham Rutherford Craven McDowell WashingtonEast Wake Academy** Tyrrell Cumberland Mitchell WataugaGuilford Union Academy** Currituck Montgomery WayneHarnett Warren Dare Moore Weldon CityHyde Woods Charter** Davidson Mooresville City Whiteville City

Davie Mount Airy City WilkesDuplin Nash-Rocky Mount WilsonEdenton/Chowan New Hanover Winston-Salem/ForsythEdgecombe Onslow YadkinElizabeth City/Pasquotank Orange YanceyElkin City Pamlico

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

60-69%

70-79%

80-89%N=26

N=2

N=4

N=107 90% or above

N=1

N=1Below 50%

50-59%

Table 11. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard* by Range


37


Edgecombe Alamance-Burlington Elizabeth City/Pasquotank PamlicoKestrel Heights** Alexander Elkin City Pender

Alleghany Franklin PerquimansAnson Franklin Academy** PersonAshe Gaston Piedmont Community**

Cape Lookout Marine** Asheboro City Gates PittKennedy Charter** Asheville City Graham Polk

Avery Granville Provisions Academy**Beaufort Gray Stone Day** Raleigh Charter HS**Bertie Guilford Randolph

C.G. Woodson** Bladen Halifax RichmondCrossroads Charter** Brunswick Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** River Mill Academy**Durham Buncombe Harnett Roanoke Rapids CityGreene Burke Haywood RobesonHenderson Cabarrus Hoke RockinghamHertford Caldwell Iredell-Statesville Rowan-SalisburyHickory City Camden Jackson RutherfordHyde Carteret Johnston SampsonLexington City Caswell Jones StanlyNewton-Conover City Catawba Kannapolis City StokesOrange Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Laurinburg Homework** SurryPace Academy** Charlotte/Mecklenburg Lee SwainRocky Mount Prep Sch** Chatham Lenoir Thomas Jefferson**Scotland Cherokee County Lincoln Thomasville CityTyrrell Clay Lincoln Charter** TransylvaniaVance Cleveland Macon UnionWoods Charter** Clinton City Madison Wake

Clover Garden** Martin WarrenColumbus McDowell WashingtonCommunity Partners High** Mitchell WataugaCraven Montgomery WayneCumberland Moore Weldon CityCurrituck Mooresville City Whiteville CityDare Mount Airy City WilkesDavidson Nash-Rocky Mount WilsonDavie New Century Charter** Winston-Salem/ForsythDuplin New Hanover YadkinEast Wake Academy** Northampton YanceyEdenton/Chowan Onslow

Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appen Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

N=17



80-89%

N=116

70-79%N=2

60-69%N=2

90% or above

38


State Percent Passing1 2007 LEA Performance *** ArtSpace Charter**, Bethany Community**, Cape Fear Center**, Carolina International**, Carter Community**, Carteret, Chatham Charter**, Clover Garden**, Davie, Evergreen Community**, Exploris**, F Delany New School**, Franklin Academy**, Gaston College Prep**, Greensboro Academy** Lake Norman**, Lincoln Charter**, Magellan**, Metrolina**, Mount Airy City, Mountain Community** Mountain Discovery**, Pamlico, Piedmont Community**, Quality Education**, Queen's Grant**, Quest Academy**, Roxboro Community**, SPARC Academy**, Sterling Montessori**, Summit Charter** The Learning Center**, Thomas Jefferson**, Union Academy**, Vance Charter**, Woods Charter** 94 Ashe, CIS Academy**, Camden, Charter Day School**, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Sugar Creek** Yancey 93 Polk, Transylvania, Watauga 92 Cherokee County, Surry, Tyrrell, Washington Montessori** 91 American Ren. Middle**, Arapahoe Charter**, Perquimans, Stanly 90 Burke, Catawba, Elkin City, Forsyth Academies**, Graham, Wilkes, Yadkin 89 Avery, Cleveland, Lincoln, River Mill Academy**, Stokes 88 Brunswick, Caswell, Davidson, Orange Charter**, Pender, Randolph, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**, Weldon City 87 Bridges**, Buncombe, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Clay, Craven, Cumberland, Henderson, Johnston, Moore, New Hanover, Rutherford 86 Cabarrus, Chatham, Clinton City, Edenton/Chowan, Haywood, Iredell-Statesville, Jackson,

Maureen Joy**, Onslow, Rockingham, Success Institute**, Wake 85 Caldwell, Roanoke Rapids City 84 Alleghany, McDowell, Montgomery, Orange 83 Granville, Harnett, Newton-Conover City, Rowan-Salisbury

2008 State 82 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Millennium**, Mitchell, Scotland2004,2005 State 81 Dare, Gates, Hoke, Mooresville City

2003 State 80 Alexander, Columbus, Hickory City, Kinston Charter Academy**, Union, Whiteville City2002,2007 State 79 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Person

1998 State 78 Alamance-Burlington, Beaufort, Gaston, Halifax, Northampton, Sampson, Wayne 77 Guilford, Macon, Nash-Rocky Mount, Wilson, Winston-Salem/Forsyth

2001 State 76 Asheboro City, Asheville City, East Wake Academy**, Thomasville City1999 State 75 Duplin, Durham, Guilford Prep Academy**, Hyde, Martin, Warren

74 Kestrel Heights**, Vance2000 State 73 Madison, Two Rivers Community School**

72 Kannapolis City 71 Currituck, Downtown Middle**, Franklin, Lee, Research Triangle** 70 Greene

69 Healthy Start** 68 Bladen, Lenoir, PreEminent**, Richmond, Robeson, Swain 67 Crossnore Academy** 66 Pitt, Washington2006 State 65 Bertie

64 Provisions Academy**63 STARS**62 Jones... 60 Edgecombe, S.B. Howard**59 Brevard Academy**, C.G. Woodson**58 Anson, Kennedy Charter**... 56 Lexington City... 54 Hertford53 Academy of Moore County**... 44 Grandfather Academy**43 Crosscreek Charter School**, Omuteko Gwamaziima**... 20 Laurinburg Homework**...

*** Alpha Academy**

Notes:*These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1Percent passing is rounded to the nearest percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Table 13. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard* for the Class of 2012, at End of Grade 8, by LEA

39


State

Percent Passing1 2007 LEA Performance

*** Camden, Franklin Academy**, Raleigh Charter HS**, Roxboro Community**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter**, Yadkin, Yancey 94 Ashe, Davie, Stanly, Union Academy** 93 Avery, Carteret, Edenton/Chowan, Graham, Mount Airy City 92 Clinton City, Elkin City, Piedmont Community**, Wilkes 91 Burke, Catawba, Cherokee County, Gray Stone Day**, Lincoln Charter**, Moore 90 Alexander, Brunswick, Gaston College Prep**, Polk, Queen's Grant**, Surry 89 Cabarrus, Craven, Cumberland, Dare, Davidson, Franklin, Haywood, Johnston, Lincoln, Pamlico 88 Asheboro City, Buncombe, Caldwell, East Wake Academy**, New Hanover, Person, Stokes 87 Gaston, Granville, Hoke, Iredell-Statesville, Madison, Mitchell, Newton-Conover City, Perquimans, Sampson, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Watauga 86 Alleghany, Currituck, Duplin, Gates, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Randolph, Richmond 85 Clay, Jackson, Macon, Mooresville City, Onslow, Wake, Winston-Salem/Forsyth

84 Henderson, Hyde, McDowell, Roanoke Rapids City, Scotland2006 State 83 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Chatham, Columbus, Pender, Rockingham, Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson

2003,2004,2005 State 82 Cleveland, Community Partners High**2001,2008 State 81 Jones, Nash-Rocky Mount, Wayne

2002 State 80 Caswell 79 Carolina International**, Clover Garden**, Kannapolis City, Lee, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**

2000 State 78 1999 State 77 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Orange, River Mill Academy**

76 Asheville City, Northampton, Weldon City2007 State 75 Alamance-Burlington, Guilford, Hickory City, Lake Norman** ...

73 New Century Charter**, Swain, Union 72 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Halifax, Kestrel Heights**, Montgomery, Thomasville City 71 Whiteville City 70 Edgecombe, Washington 69 Greene, Lenoir, Rutherford ... 67 Bladen, Pitt 66 Harnett, Lexington City, Robeson, Warren

65 Anson ... 60 C.G. Woodson** ... 58 Hertford ... 55 Durham 54 Vance 53 Bertie, Pace Academy** ... 47 Beaufort 46 Quality Education** 45 Cape Lookout Marine** 44 Laurinburg Homework** 43 Crossnore Academy** ... 41 Provisions Academy** ... 39 Crossroads Charter** ... 31 Kennedy Charter** ... 28 Martin ... *** Grandfather Academy**



40


State Percent Passing1 2007 LEA Performance *** Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Brunswick, Cabarrus, Camden, Carteret, Catawba, Clinton City, Clover Garden**, Craven, Davie, Elkin City, Franklin Academy**, Franklin, Granville, Lincoln Charter**, Macon, Mitchell, Mount Airy City, New Century Charter**, Pamlico, Perquimans, Piedmont Community**, Polk, Randolph, Stanly, Surry, Thomas Jefferson**, Tyrrell, Union Academy**, Wilkes, Woods Charter**, Yadkin, Yancey 94 Buncombe, Burke, Carolina International**, Community Partners High**, Dare, Duplin, Gates, Graham, Gray Stone Day**, Haywood, Johnston, Lincoln, Moore, Person, Raleigh Charter HS**, Transylvania 93 Cherokee County, Clay, Edenton/Chowan, Hoke, Kannapolis City, Madison, New Hanover, Roxboro Community**, Stokes 92 Asheboro City, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Cumberland, Iredell-Statesville, Mooresville City, Onslow, Roanoke Rapids City, Rockingham, Rowan-Salisbury, Sampson, Wake, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 91 Cleveland, Davidson, Gaston, Jackson, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**

2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 State 90 Caldwell, McDowell, Richmond, Weldon City2002, 2008 State 89 Asheville City, Beaufort, Chatham, Harnett, Pender, Wayne

88 Henderson, Newton-Conover City, Orange, Watauga, Wilson2000 State 87 Currituck, Halifax, Lee, Montgomery, Nash-Rocky Mount, Scotland, Swain

86 Gaston College Prep** 85 Alamance-Burlington, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Pitt, Quality Education**, Union, Warren

84 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Queen's Grant**, Thomasville City 83 Edgecombe, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Northampton, Robeson 82 Hyde, Lexington City 81 Columbus, Jones, Lenoir ... 79 Martin, River Mill Academy**, Washington ... 77 Guilford, Hickory City, Kestrel Heights** 76 Caswell 75 Bertie, Whiteville City 74 East Wake Academy**, Greene, Hertford 73 Pace Academy** ... 71 Anson 70 Bladen, Cape Lookout Marine** 69 Vance 68 Durham 67 Laurinburg Homework** ... 65 Rutherford ... 63 Crossnore Academy**, Provisions Academy** ... 60 C.G. Woodson** ... 55 Kennedy Charter** 54 Crossroads Charter** ... *** Grandfather Academy**



41


State Percent Passing1 2007 LEA Performance *** Alexander, Ashe, Asheboro City, Avery, Brunswick, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Caldwell, Camden, Catawba, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Clay, Clinton City, Clover Garden**, Community Partners High**, Craven, Cumberland, Davidson, Duplin, Edenton/Chowan, Elkin City, Franklin Academy**, Franklin, Gaston, Gates, Graham, Granville, Gray Stone Day**, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Haywood, Hoke, Iredell-Statesville, Johnston, Lincoln, Madison, McDowell, Moore, Mount Airy City, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender, Person, Piedmont Community**, Polk, Raleigh Charter HS**, Randolph, Richmond, River Mill Academy**, Roanoke Rapids City, Rockingham, Sampson, Stanly, Stokes,

Surry, Swain, Thomas Jefferson**, Transylvania, Wake, Washington, Watauga, Wilkes, Wilson, Winston-Salem/Forsyth, Yadkin, Yancey

2003 State 94 Cherokee County, Davie, Wayne, Weldon City2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 State 93 Asheville City, Burke, Dare, Gaston College Prep**, Kannapolis City, Lincoln Charter**,

Macon, Mooresville City, Nash-Rocky Mount, Orange2001 State 92 Alleghany, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Cleveland, Halifax, Jackson, Kestrel Heights**, Pitt,

Rowan-Salisbury, Roxboro Community** 91 Bladen, Carteret, Currituck, Henderson, Lenoir, Mitchell, Montgomery, Robeson

90 Caswell, Chatham, Edgecombe, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Greene, Hickory City, Scotland, Thomasville City, Union, Whiteville City 89 East Wake Academy**, Lexington City, Newton-Conover City, Northampton 88 Anson, Bertie, Columbus, Lee, Perquimans, Union Academy**, Warren 87 Guilford, Harnett, Hyde, Martin 86 Alamance-Burlington, Beaufort, Crossnore Academy** 85 Rutherford 84 Jones, Tyrrell 83 C.G. Woodson**, Woods Charter** 82 Rocky Mount Prep Sch** ... 80 Crossroads Charter**, Durham 79 Vance 78 Hertford, Provisions Academy** ... 76 Kennedy Charter** ... 69 Pace Academy** ... 61 New Century Charter** ... 57 Laurinburg Homework** ... 46 Cape Lookout Marine** ... *** Grandfather Academy**Notes:*These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. 1Percent passing is rounded to the nearest percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


42


State Percent Passing1 2007 LEA Performance2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, *** Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Asheboro City, Asheville City, Avery, Brunswick, Buncombe,2006, 2007, 2008 State Burke, Cabarrus, Caldwell, Camden, Catawba, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Charlotte/Mecklenburg,

Cherokee County, Clay, Clinton City, Clover Garden**, Community Partners High**, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Davidson, Davie, Duplin, East Wake Academy**, Edenton/Chowan, Elkin City, Franklin Academy**, Franklin, Gaston, Gates, Graham, Granville, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Haywood, Hoke, Iredell-Statesville, Jackson, Johnston, Kannapolis City, Lincoln Charter**, Macon, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Montgomery, Moore, Mooresville City, Mount Airy City,

New Century Charter**, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Person, Polk, Provisions Academy**, Raleigh Charter HS**, Randolph, Richmond, River Mill Academy**, Roanoke Rapids City, Rockingham, Rowan-Salisbury, Sampson, Stanly, Stokes, Surry, Swain, Thomas Jefferson**, Transylvania,

Wake, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Wayne, Whiteville City, Wilkes, Wilson, Winston-Salem/Forsyth, Yadkin, Yancey 94 Beaufort, Carteret, Caswell, Lincoln, Nash-Rocky Mount, Pender, Robeson

93 Bladen, Gray Stone Day**, Guilford, Perquimans, Piedmont Community**, Pitt, Union 92 Bertie, Chatham, Cleveland, Dare, Halifax, Harnett, Lenoir, Rutherford 91 Alamance-Burlington, Columbus, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Jones, Lee, Thomasville City, Weldon City 90 Laurinburg Homework**, Martin 89 C.G. Woodson**, Henderson 88 Durham, Greene, Hertford, Hickory City, Orange, Scotland 87 Crossroads Charter** ... 85 Vance 84 Hyde, Pace Academy**, Woods Charter** ... 82 Newton-Conover City, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**, Tyrrell 81 Lexington City ... 76 Cape Lookout Marine**...

72 Kennedy Charter**... 65 Edgecombe64 Kestrel Heights**... *** Crossnore Academy**



43

44


Student Performance

byLEA and Region

on the North Carolina Computer Skills

Proficiency Standard

45

46



Member-shipPercent Passing Member-ship

Percent Passing Member-ship







Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Western Region 7,716 86.0 110 78.2 71 93.0 464 70.7 467 71.3 219 84.9 6,385 88.3 3,732 88.6 3,984 83.6

Buncombe 2,063 86.8 7 71.4 23 >=95% 118 71.2 120 72.5 81 85.2 1,714 88.8 974 89.0 1,089 84.8

Asheville City 241 75.5 1 * 1 * 98 52.0 16 75.0 10 80.0 115 >=95% 113 77.0 128 74.2

Cherokee County 294 91.8 2 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 5 * 278 91.4 146 93.8 148 89.9

Clay 94 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 1 * 91 86.8 42 >=95% 52 80.8

Graham 89 89.9 13 84.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 90.8 43 88.4 46 91.3

Haywood 622 85.7 8 87.5 3 * 8 75.0 22 54.5 10 80.0 571 87.0 297 90.6 325 81.2

Henderson 985 86.8 1 * 15 73.3 52 69.2 141 73.0 35 74.3 741 91.5 472 88.8 513 85.0

Jackson 266 86.1 32 84.4 1 * 2 * 13 61.5 2 * 216 88.0 123 89.4 143 83.2

Macon 349 76.8 3 * 3 * 4 * 22 45.5 4 * 313 79.2 182 82.4 167 70.7

Madison 190 73.2 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 4 * 2 * 183 72.7 99 77.8 91 68.1

McDowell 518 84.4 0 -- 9 * 17 88.2 39 66.7 7 * 446 85.2 253 87.0 265 81.9

Mitchell 175 82.3 1 * 0 -- 1 * 7 42.9 2 * 164 84.8 77 89.6 98 76.5

Polk 210 93.3 0 -- 1 * 17 88.2 17 82.4 10 70.0 165 >=95% 95 >=95% 115 90.4

Rutherford 743 86.9 0 -- 2 * 121 79.3 31 83.9 25 >=95% 564 88.3 370 88.1 373 85.8

Swain 165 68.5 40 67.5 1 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 118 67.8 78 74.4 87 63.2

Transylvania 253 92.9 0 -- 6 * 10 80.0 4 * 10 90.0 223 93.7 130 93.1 123 92.7

Yancey 235 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 19 73.7 3 * 209 >=95% 121 >=95% 114 93.0

ArtSpace Charter** 18 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 16 * 9 * 9 *

F Delany New School** 10 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10 * 6 * 4 *

Evergreen Community** 41 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 1 * 3 * 4 * 32 >=95% 16 * 25 >=95%

The Learning Center** 6 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 1 * 5 *

Mountain Community** 16 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 15 * 6 * 10 *

Summit Charter** 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 * 6 * 6 *

Thomas Jefferson** 95 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 4 * 88 >=95% 60 >=95% 35 >=95%

Mountain Discovery** 9 * 1 * 1 * 1 * 0 -- 1 * 5 * 5 * 4 *

Brevard Academy** 17 58.8 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 -- 1 * 14 57.1 8 50.0 9 66.7

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

47

Asian Black Hispanic

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Ethnicity, and Gender

General Test

Female Male

Western Region

Multi-Racial WhiteTotal

Table 18a. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

American Indian


Membership Percent Passing Membership

Percent Passing Membership





Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Western Region 7,716 86.0 1,429 84.0 6,287 86.5 1,423 84.1 0 -- 6 50.0 7,710 86.0

Buncombe 2,063 86.8 3 * 2,060 86.8 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 2,060 86.8Asheville City 241 75.5 0 -- 241 75.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 241 75.5Cherokee County 294 91.8 294 91.8 0 -- 294 91.8 0 -- 0 -- 294 91.8Clay 94 87.2 0 -- 94 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 94 87.2Graham 89 89.9 0 -- 89 89.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 89 89.9Haywood 622 85.7 1 * 621 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 621 85.7Henderson 985 86.8 2 * 983 86.9 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 983 86.9Jackson 266 86.1 240 88.8 26 61.5 240 88.8 0 -- 0 -- 266 86.1Macon 349 76.8 314 75.2 35 91.4 314 75.2 0 -- 0 -- 349 76.8Madison 190 73.2 0 -- 190 73.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 190 73.2McDowell 518 84.4 0 -- 518 84.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 518 84.448 Mitchell 175 82.3 175 82.3 0 -- 175 82.3 0 -- 0 -- 175 82.3Polk 210 93.3 0 -- 210 93.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 210 93.3Rutherford 743 86.9 0 -- 743 86.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 743 86.9Swain 165 68.5 165 68.5 0 -- 165 68.5 0 -- 0 -- 165 68.5Transylvania 253 92.9 0 -- 253 92.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 253 92.9Yancey 235 94.0 235 94.0 0 -- 235 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 235 94.0ArtSpace Charter** 18 * 0 -- 18 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 18 *F Delany New School** 10 * 0 -- 10 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10 *Evergreen Community** 41 >=95% 0 -- 41 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 41 >=95%The Learning Center** 6 * 0 -- 6 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 *Mountain Community** 16 * 0 -- 16 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 16 *Summit Charter** 12 * 0 -- 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 *Thomas Jefferson** 95 >=95% 0 -- 95 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 95 >=95%Mountain Discovery** 9 * 0 -- 9 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 9 *Brevard Academy** 17 58.8 0 -- 17 58.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 17 58.8

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Not MigrantTargeted AssistanceTotal Served by Title I

Table 18b. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant Students

General TestWestern Region

Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program Migrant


Member-ship Percent Passing Member-ship








Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Northwest Region 17,110 84.8 36 77.8 450 90.7 2,633 67.0 1,482 69.9 462 85.1 12,047 90.3 8,377 87.6 8,733 82.2

Alexander 463 79.7 0 -- 17 * 23 73.9 27 51.9 2 * 394 81.0 221 82.8 242 76.9

Alleghany 116 84.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 92.3 2 * 101 83.2 56 87.5 60 81.7

Ashe 243 94.2 0 -- 1 * 1 * 9 88.9 6 * 226 94.2 124 >=95% 119 91.6

Avery 187 89.3 1 * 1 * 0 -- 9 44.4 5 80.0 171 91.8 90 94.4 97 84.5

Burke 1,200 90.1 2 * 111 92.8 82 68.3 52 80.8 35 88.6 918 92.4 562 92.9 638 87.6

Caldwell 1,058 85.0 2 * 11 * 73 68.5 59 78.0 27 81.5 886 86.7 514 87.0 544 83.1

Catawba 1,331 89.7 5 60.0 104 90.4 94 74.5 104 87.5 38 92.1 986 91.4 652 93.1 679 86.5

Hickory City 337 79.5 0 -- 19 78.9 95 73.7 36 55.6 14 71.4 173 88.4 180 78.3 157 80.9

Newton-Conover City 185 82.7 0 -- 10 90.0 35 77.1 29 72.4 6 * 105 85.7 98 86.7 87 78.2

Davidson 1,561 87.7 6 83.3 18 77.8 52 71.2 53 69.8 24 83.3 1,408 89.2 782 89.4 779 86.0

Lexington City 241 56.0 0 -- 19 68.4 101 49.5 53 50.9 10 50.0 58 69.0 126 61.9 115 49.6

Thomasville City 207 76.3 1 * 3 * 106 80.2 43 65.1 6 50.0 48 81.3 111 82.9 96 68.8

Davie 525 >=95% 0 -- 8 * 32 >=95% 46 91.3 15 * 424 >=95% 278 >=95% 247 93.9

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,780 76.8 11 72.7 69 89.9 1,269 61.9 504 59.3 151 84.8 1,776 91.2 1,837 80.2 1,943 73.5

Iredell-Statesville 1,728 86.4 5 * 40 >=95% 279 69.2 127 74.8 41 82.9 1,236 91.2 831 90.0 897 83.1

Mooresville City 425 80.7 0 -- 5 * 82 63.4 18 72.2 10 50.0 310 86.5 218 83.5 207 77.8

Stokes 605 88.6 1 * 0 -- 29 75.9 16 87.5 14 92.9 545 89.2 289 90.3 316 87.0

Surry 657 92.4 1 * 2 * 19 78.9 89 83.1 11 * 535 94.2 313 >=95% 344 89.5

Elkin City 107 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 9 77.8 18 66.7 3 * 77 >=95% 51 88.2 56 91.1

Mount Airy City 112 94.6 0 -- 2 * 5 * 7 85.7 2 * 96 >=95% 59 94.9 53 94.3

Watauga 378 92.6 0 -- 2 * 3 * 14 42.9 7 85.7 352 94.6 181 >=95% 197 89.8

Wilkes 810 90.0 0 -- 6 * 42 85.7 49 79.6 15 86.7 698 91.0 381 92.4 429 87.9

Yadkin 492 90.2 1 * 0 -- 12 58.3 87 79.3 8 * 384 93.5 241 89.6 251 90.8

Grandfather Academy** 9 44.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 8 37.5 1 * 8 50.0

Crossnore Academy** 15 66.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 14 64.3 8 62.5 7 71.4

Quality Education** 24 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 22 >=95% 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 16 93.8 8 *

Downtown Middle** 113 70.8 0 -- 0 -- 92 66.3 4 * 4 * 13 92.3 57 75.4 56 66.1

C.G. Woodson** 22 59.1 0 -- 0 -- 19 63.2 2 * 1 * 0 -- 10 90.0 12 33.3

Forsyth Academies** 67 89.6 0 -- 2 * 35 88.6 11 90.9 0 -- 19 89.5 40 >=95% 27 81.5

American Ren. Middle** 55 90.9 0 -- 0 -- 7 71.4 1 * 2 * 45 93.3 26 92.3 29 89.7

Success Institute** 14 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 13 84.6 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 7 85.7 7 85.7

Millennium** 17 82.4 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 15 80.0 6 * 11 72.7

Two Rivers Community Sch 11 72.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 11 72.7 6 83.3 5 60.0

Bridges** 15 86.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 86.7 5 80.0 10 90.0


49

Total American Indian Asian

Northwest Region

Table 18c. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test

Female MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial White








Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Northwest Region 17,110 84.8 2,340 72.9 14,770 86.7 2,329 73.0 0 -- 11 63.6 17,099 84.8

Alexander 463 79.7 0 -- 463 79.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 463 79.7

Alleghany 116 84.5 116 84.5 0 -- 116 84.5 0 -- 0 -- 116 84.5

Ashe 243 94.2 0 -- 243 94.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 243 94.2

Avery 187 89.3 0 -- 187 89.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 187 89.3

Burke 1,200 90.1 0 -- 1,200 90.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,200 90.1

Caldwell 1,058 85.0 904 83.5 154 93.5 904 83.5 0 -- 0 -- 1,058 85.0

Catawba 1,331 89.7 0 -- 1,331 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,331 89.7

Hickory City 337 79.5 333 80.5 4 * 333 80.5 0 -- 0 -- 337 79.5

Newton-Conover City 185 82.7 0 -- 185 82.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 185 82.7

Davidson 1,561 87.7 0 -- 1,561 87.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,561 87.7

Lexington City 241 56.0 239 56.5 2 * 239 56.5 0 -- 0 -- 241 56.0

Thomasville City 207 76.3 0 -- 207 76.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 207 76.3

Davie 525 >=95% 0 -- 525 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 525 >=95%

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,780 76.8 600 53.8 3,180 81.1 600 53.8 0 -- 0 -- 3,780 76.8

Iredell-Statesville 1,728 86.4 11 36.4 1,717 86.7 11 36.4 0 -- 0 -- 1,728 86.4

Mooresville City 425 80.7 0 -- 425 80.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 425 80.7

Stokes 605 88.6 0 -- 605 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 605 88.6

Surry 657 92.4 11 63.6 646 92.9 0 -- 0 -- 11 63.6 646 92.9

Elkin City 107 89.7 0 -- 107 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 107 89.7

Mount Airy City 112 94.6 0 -- 112 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 112 94.6

Watauga 378 92.6 75 93.3 303 92.4 75 93.3 0 -- 0 -- 378 92.6

Wilkes 810 90.0 0 -- 810 90.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 810 90.0

Yadkin 492 90.2 51 92.2 441 90.0 51 92.2 0 -- 0 -- 492 90.2

Grandfather Academy** 9 44.4 0 -- 9 44.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 9 44.4

Crossnore Academy** 15 66.7 0 -- 15 66.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 66.7

Quality Education** 24 >=95% 0 -- 24 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 24 >=95%

Downtown Middle** 113 70.8 0 -- 113 70.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 113 70.8

C.G. Woodson** 22 59.1 0 -- 22 59.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 22 59.1

Forsyth Academies** 67 89.6 0 -- 67 89.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 67 89.6

American Ren. Middle** 55 90.9 0 -- 55 90.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 55 90.9

Success Institute** 14 85.7 0 -- 14 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 85.7

Millennium** 17 82.4 0 -- 17 82.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 17 82.4

Two Rivers Community School* 11 72.7 0 -- 11 72.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 11 72.7Bridges** 15 86.7 0 -- 15 86.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 86.7

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

50

Northwest Region

Targeted Assistance Migrant Not Migrant

Table 18d. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test

Total Served by Title I Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program










Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Southwest Region 26,708 81.2 290 74.1 676 87.7 8,371 69.7 2,659 70.4 615 83.4 14,097 89.9 13,116 84.2 13,592 78.4

Anson 353 58.4 2 * 15 80.0 219 43.4 7 57.1 2 * 108 85.2 171 62.6 182 54.4

Cabarrus 2,082 86.2 6 66.7 36 88.9 360 74.2 201 66.7 72 84.7 1,407 92.2 976 89.2 1,106 83.5

Kannapolis City 405 72.3 0 -- 7 71.4 127 63.8 70 65.7 16 81.3 185 80.0 186 71.5 219 73.1

Cleveland 1,357 88.9 4 * 8 87.5 379 81.0 40 80.0 21 81.0 905 92.8 672 91.5 685 86.4

Gaston 2,484 78.5 5 * 47 >=95% 524 61.5 149 69.1 28 75.0 1,731 83.9 1,168 81.5 1,316 75.8

Hoke 582 81.3 72 72.2 2 * 292 80.5 60 75.0 17 70.6 139 91.4 311 84.9 271 77.1

Lincoln 1,001 88.6 3 * 5 * 67 82.1 82 78.0 29 93.1 815 89.9 494 91.9 507 85.4

Charlotte/Mecklenburg 10,104 79.1 54 70.4 428 86.0 4,548 71.4 1,454 70.5 250 85.2 3,370 92.1 4,986 81.8 5,118 76.5

Montgomery 324 84.3 1 * 6 66.7 91 73.6 75 80.0 3 * 148 93.2 153 86.3 171 82.5

Moore 993 87.3 3 * 15 73.3 189 70.9 75 85.3 22 86.4 689 92.3 470 88.5 523 86.2

Richmond 706 67.6 48 54.2 9 * 271 55.7 30 70.0 10 80.0 338 77.5 352 73.3 354 61.9

Rowan-Salisbury 1,623 82.9 4 * 16 93.8 337 66.8 108 68.5 49 81.6 1,109 89.0 786 89.2 837 76.9

Scotland 530 81.7 74 85.1 6 * 267 74.5 6 66.7 9 77.8 168 91.7 249 86.3 281 77.6

Stanly 784 91.5 4 * 24 >=95% 118 79.7 39 89.7 15 * 584 93.8 416 91.1 368 91.8

Union 2,740 80.1 8 87.5 31 90.3 455 56.5 249 60.6 60 73.3 1,937 88.1 1,396 83.0 1,344 77.0

Carolina International** 43 >=95% 0 -- 4 * 6 * 0 -- 5 * 28 >=95% 26 >=95% 17 94.1

Piedmont Community** 58 >=95% 1 * 2 * 8 87.5 2 * 1 * 44 >=95% 31 93.5 27 >=95%

Lincoln Charter** 64 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 2 * 60 >=95% 34 94.1 30 >=95%

Kennedy Charter** 26 57.7 0 -- 0 -- 24 62.5 1 * 0 -- 1 * 11 63.6 15 53.3

Lake Norman** 184 >=95% 0 -- 7 * 3 * 4 * 2 * 168 >=95% 103 >=95% 81 92.6

Sugar Creek** 48 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 47 93.6 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 23 91.3 25 >=95%

Metrolina** 16 * 0 -- 8 * 0 -- 1 * 1 * 6 * 6 * 10 *

Queen's Grant** 78 94.9 1 * 0 -- 5 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 72 >=95% 40 >=95% 38 92.1

Academy of Moore County** 19 52.6 0 -- 0 -- 9 22.2 1 * 0 -- 9 77.8 7 28.6 12 66.7

STARS** 19 63.2 0 -- 0 -- 8 50.0 0 -- 0 -- 11 72.7 11 63.6 8 62.5

Laurinburg Homework** 5 20.0 0 -- 0 -- 5 20.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 4 *

Union Academy** 80 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 10 * 4 * 1 * 65 >=95% 37 >=95% 43 >=95%


Total American Indian Asian Female MaleBlack

Table 18e. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Ethnicity, and GenderSouthwest Region

General Test

Hispanic Multi-Racial White

51


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Southwest Region 26,708 81.2 769 87.4 25,939 81.1 761 87.6 0 -- 9 66.7 26,699 81.3Anson 353 58.4 0 -- 353 58.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 353 58.4Cabarrus 2,082 86.2 0 -- 2,082 86.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,082 86.2Kannapolis City 405 72.3 0 -- 405 72.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 405 72.3Cleveland 1,357 88.9 0 -- 1,357 88.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,357 88.9Gaston 2,484 78.5 0 -- 2,484 78.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,484 78.5Hoke 582 81.3 6 66.7 576 81.4 0 -- 0 -- 6 66.7 576 81.4Lincoln 1,001 88.6 494 89.3 507 88.0 494 89.3 0 -- 0 -- 1,001 88.6Charlotte/Mecklenburg 10,104 79.1 0 -- 10,104 79.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10,104 79.1Montgomery 324 84.3 0 -- 324 84.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 324 84.3Moore 993 87.3 117 86.3 876 87.4 117 86.3 0 -- 1 * 992 87.3Richmond 706 67.6 105 77.1 601 65.9 105 77.1 0 -- 0 -- 706 67.6Rowan-Salisbury 1,623 82.9 2 * 1,621 82.9 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,621 82.9Scotland 530 81.7 0 -- 530 81.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 530 81.7Stanly 784 91.5 45 >=95% 739 91.1 45 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 784 91.5Union 2,740 80.1 0 -- 2,740 80.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,740 80.1Carolina International** 43 >=95% 0 -- 43 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 >=95%Piedmont Community** 58 >=95% 0 -- 58 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 58 >=95%Lincoln Charter** 64 >=95% 0 -- 64 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 64 >=95%Kennedy Charter** 26 57.7 0 -- 26 57.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 26 57.7Lake Norman** 184 >=95% 0 -- 184 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 184 >=95%Sugar Creek** 48 93.8 0 -- 48 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 48 93.8Metrolina** 16 * 0 -- 16 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 16 *Queen's Grant** 78 94.9 0 -- 78 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 94.9Academy of Moore County** 19 52.6 0 -- 19 52.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 19 52.6STARS** 19 63.2 0 -- 19 63.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 19 63.2Laurinburg Homework** 5 20.0 0 -- 5 20.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5 20.0Union Academy** 80 >=95% 0 -- 80 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 80 >=95%


Migrant Not Migrant

52

Table 18f. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test

Total Served by Title I Not Served by Title I

Southwest Region

Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Northeast Region 6,676 73.1 39 87.2 43 81.4 3,419 63.9 276 69.6 107 79.4 2,792 84.1 3,281 77.8 3,395 68.5

Beaufort 525 78.5 0 -- 0 -- 209 67.5 44 70.5 10 80.0 262 88.5 258 85.3 267 71.9

Bertie 261 65.1 0 -- 1 * 233 63.5 2 * 1 * 24 75.0 133 70.7 128 59.4

Camden 144 93.8 0 -- 1 * 23 91.3 0 -- 3 * 117 94.0 66 >=95% 78 92.3

Edenton/Chowan 197 86.3 1 * 0 -- 94 77.7 1 * 3 * 98 94.9 87 92.0 110 81.8

Currituck 328 70.7 0 -- 2 * 27 63.0 9 55.6 11 63.6 279 72.0 152 76.3 176 65.9

Dare 370 80.5 0 -- 4 * 13 69.2 23 65.2 8 62.5 322 82.3 176 87.5 194 74.2

Edgecombe 561 60.1 1 * 1 * 337 53.1 32 68.8 8 87.5 182 70.3 298 66.1 263 53.2

Gates 170 80.6 1 * 2 * 69 68.1 0 -- 0 -- 98 88.8 87 87.4 83 73.5

Halifax 383 77.8 23 87.0 0 -- 338 77.5 4 * 3 * 15 60.0 185 82.7 198 73.2

Roanoke Rapids City 204 84.8 1 * 3 * 41 68.3 3 * 1 * 155 89.0 102 88.2 102 81.4

Weldon City 78 88.5 0 -- 2 * 72 87.5 2 * 0 -- 2 * 37 >=95% 41 80.5

Hertford 252 54.4 3 * 1 * 210 52.4 3 * 4 * 31 61.3 127 64.6 125 44.0

Hyde 53 75.5 0 -- 0 -- 17 70.6 4 * 1 * 31 83.9 29 86.2 24 62.5

Martin 322 74.8 1 * 3 * 168 64.9 11 90.9 2 * 137 86.1 154 84.4 168 66.1

Northampton 210 77.6 1 * 0 -- 176 75.0 2 * 1 * 30 93.3 96 80.2 114 75.4

Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 403 81.9 2 * 1 * 187 75.4 11 63.6 14 * 188 87.8 201 84.6 202 79.2

Perquimans 138 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 40 90.0 2 * 2 * 94 92.6 59 93.2 79 89.9

Pitt 1,768 66.0 2 * 21 61.9 956 52.4 112 67.9 33 75.8 644 85.2 884 68.7 884 63.2

Tyrrell 52 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 22 86.4 3 * 1 * 26 >=95% 23 91.3 29 93.1

Washington 167 66.5 0 -- 1 * 123 61.8 6 83.3 1 * 36 77.8 78 74.4 89 59.6

Washington Montessori** 12 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 -- 10 90.0 7 * 5 80.0

Gaston College Prep** 78 94.9 3 * 0 -- 63 93.7 1 * 0 -- 11 * 42 >=95% 36 91.7



Table 18g. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Ethnicity, and GenderNortheast Region

General Test


53


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Northeast Region 6,676 73.1 1,221 68.6 5,455 74.1 1,193 68.6 25 72.0 5 60.0 6,671 73.1Beaufort 525 78.5 1 * 524 78.6 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 524 78.6Bertie 261 65.1 0 -- 261 65.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 261 65.1Camden 144 93.8 0 -- 144 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 144 93.8Edenton/Chowan 197 86.3 0 -- 197 86.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 197 86.3Currituck 328 70.7 0 -- 328 70.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 328 70.7Dare 370 80.5 0 -- 370 80.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 370 80.5Edgecombe 561 60.1 81 56.8 480 60.6 80 56.3 0 -- 1 * 560 60.0Gates 170 80.6 0 -- 170 80.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 170 80.6Halifax 383 77.8 0 -- 383 77.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 383 77.8Roanoke Rapids City 204 84.8 0 -- 204 84.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 204 84.8Weldon City 78 88.5 78 88.5 0 -- 78 88.5 0 -- 0 -- 78 88.5Hertford 252 54.4 252 54.4 0 -- 252 54.4 0 -- 0 -- 252 54.4Hyde 53 75.5 45 73.3 8 87.5 45 73.3 0 -- 0 -- 53 75.5Martin 322 74.8 322 74.8 0 -- 322 74.8 0 -- 0 -- 322 74.8Northampton 210 77.6 203 79.3 7 28.6 203 79.3 0 -- 2 * 208 77.9Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 403 81.9 0 -- 403 81.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 403 81.9Perquimans 138 91.3 0 -- 138 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 138 91.3Pitt 1,768 66.0 93 65.6 1,675 66.0 67 62.7 25 72.0 1 * 1,767 65.9Tyrrell 52 92.3 0 -- 52 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 52 92.3Washington 167 66.5 146 61.6 21 >=95% 146 61.6 0 -- 0 -- 167 66.5Washington Montessori** 12 91.7 0 -- 12 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 91.7Gaston College Prep** 78 94.9 0 -- 78 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 94.9


Targeted Assistance Migrant Not MigrantTotal Served by Title I Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program

General Test

Table 18h. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsNortheast Region

54


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Southeast Region 18,592 82.1 1,009 69.0 197 88.3 6,451 74.2 1,454 75.9 628 88.2 8,853 89.9 9,070 85.7 9,522 78.8

Bladen 439 68.3 6 50.0 0 -- 213 57.3 30 70.0 4 * 186 82.3 223 75.8 216 60.6

Brunswick 984 87.7 7 85.7 4 * 209 83.3 61 78.7 34 79.4 669 90.4 503 88.9 481 86.5

Carteret 682 94.7 2 * 12 66.7 51 84.3 15 80.0 20 >=95% 582 >=95% 333 >=95% 349 92.0

Columbus 499 80.4 37 81.1 0 -- 188 78.7 24 79.2 5 * 245 81.2 261 84.3 238 76.1

Whiteville City 172 80.2 0 -- 1 * 70 71.4 4 * 5 60.0 92 90.2 93 81.7 79 78.5

Craven 1,084 87.2 3 * 20 70.0 402 78.9 49 83.7 25 >=95% 585 93.7 513 90.3 571 84.4

Cumberland 4,276 87.1 95 82.1 80 >=95% 2,110 82.8 301 86.7 179 89.9 1,511 92.7 2,061 89.5 2,215 84.9

Duplin 676 75.3 2 * 2 * 220 63.2 164 68.3 10 80.0 278 88.5 325 80.9 351 70.1

Greene 242 69.8 0 -- 1 * 109 65.1 49 63.3 3 * 80 78.8 100 78.0 142 64.1

Jones 90 62.2 0 -- 0 -- 51 52.9 1 * 2 * 36 75.0 44 77.3 46 47.8

Lenoir 747 68.0 1 * 4 * 360 55.3 56 62.5 17 88.2 309 82.5 356 72.2 391 64.2

New Hanover 1,905 86.7 5 * 26 >=95% 514 75.3 110 72.7 57 87.7 1,193 92.5 909 87.3 996 86.0

Onslow 1,734 85.6 16 93.8 20 85.0 375 76.5 124 87.9 149 91.9 1,050 87.6 881 88.4 853 82.8

Pamlico 112 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 34 88.2 2 * 2 * 74 >=95% 57 >=95% 55 92.7

Pender 641 88.1 1 * 3 * 142 78.9 41 70.7 13 * 441 92.5 291 90.7 350 86.0

Robeson 1,850 67.9 784 65.1 6 * 548 62.0 129 71.3 36 80.6 347 80.7 910 75.1 940 61.1

Sampson 662 77.9 3 * 0 -- 183 69.9 128 73.4 19 68.4 329 84.8 315 84.1 347 72.3

Clinton City 215 85.6 12 83.3 5 * 90 83.3 32 65.6 5 80.0 71 >=95% 105 87.6 110 83.6

Wayne 1,416 77.5 3 * 11 72.7 545 65.9 129 69.0 39 84.6 689 88.0 715 83.1 701 71.9

Charter Day School** 32 93.8 1 * 0 -- 1 * 1 * 2 * 27 92.6 15 93.3 17 94.1

Alpha Academy** 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 2 * 2 *

Kinston Charter Academy 25 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 22 81.8 1 * 1 * 1 * 11 81.8 14 78.6

Cape Fear Center** 27 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 0 -- 1 * 20 >=95% 11 90.9 16 *

Arapahoe Charter** 43 90.7 0 -- 2 * 1 * 3 * 0 -- 37 91.9 20 >=95% 23 87.0

CIS Academy** 35 94.3 31 93.5 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 16 93.8 19 94.7

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Table 18i. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Ethnicity, and GenderSoutheast Region

General Test


55








Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Southeast Region 18,592 82.1 9,067 78.8 9,525 85.3 8,636 79.2 427 70.0 22 54.5 18,570 82.2Bladen 439 68.3 1 * 438 68.3 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 438 68.3Brunswick 984 87.7 85 >=95% 899 87.0 82 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 981 87.8Carteret 682 94.7 48 89.6 634 >=95% 48 89.6 0 -- 0 -- 682 94.7Columbus 499 80.4 499 80.4 0 -- 499 80.4 0 -- 3 * 496 80.2Whiteville City 172 80.2 172 80.2 0 -- 172 80.2 0 -- 5 60.0 167 80.8Craven 1,084 87.2 0 -- 1,084 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,084 87.2Cumberland 4,276 87.1 3,269 86.9 1,007 87.7 3,269 86.9 0 -- 0 -- 4,276 87.1Duplin 676 75.3 305 82.6 371 69.3 305 82.6 0 -- 0 -- 676 75.3Greene 242 69.8 0 -- 242 69.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 242 69.8Jones 90 62.2 90 62.2 0 -- 90 62.2 0 -- 0 -- 90 62.2Lenoir 747 68.0 740 68.6 7 * 740 68.6 0 -- 1 * 746 68.1New Hanover 1,905 86.7 427 70.0 1,478 91.5 0 -- 427 70.0 0 -- 1,905 86.7Onslow 1,734 85.6 0 -- 1,734 85.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,734 85.6Pamlico 112 >=95% 0 -- 112 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 112 >=95%56 Pender 641 88.1 388 82.7 253 >=95% 388 82.7 0 -- 2 * 639 88.3Robeson 1,850 67.9 1,850 67.9 0 -- 1,850 67.9 0 -- 5 * 1,845 68.1Sampson 662 77.9 662 77.9 0 -- 662 77.9 0 -- 2 * 660 77.9Clinton City 215 85.6 215 85.6 0 -- 215 85.6 0 -- 0 -- 215 85.6Wayne 1,416 77.5 316 78.5 1,100 77.3 316 78.5 0 -- 0 -- 1,416 77.5Charter Day School** 32 93.8 0 -- 32 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 32 93.8Alpha Academy** 4 * 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 *Kinston Charter Academy** 25 80.0 0 -- 25 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 25 80.0Cape Fear Center** 27 >=95% 0 -- 27 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 27 >=95%Arapahoe Charter** 43 90.7 0 -- 43 90.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 90.7CIS Academy** 35 94.3 0 -- 35 94.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 35 94.3



Program

Southeast Region

Table 18j. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Central Region 36,022 82.0 157 83.4 1,151 87.5 11,978 70.6 3,748 70.3 1,183 86.1 17,805 91.5 17,398 85.3 18,624 78.9Alamance-Burlington 1,790 77.9 3 * 22 81.8 426 67.4 273 61.2 42 88.1 1,024 86.1 868 82.5 922 73.5Caswell 258 88.4 0 -- 2 * 104 82.7 13 84.6 9 * 130 93.1 138 92.8 120 83.3Chatham 598 86.5 3 * 5 * 89 70.8 130 77.7 27 81.5 344 94.5 292 90.8 306 82.4Durham 2,361 74.6 6 83.3 49 83.7 1,371 70.8 325 60.6 84 82.1 526 91.3 1,134 79.7 1,227 69.9Franklin 680 70.9 0 -- 7 * 264 56.1 65 58.5 9 66.7 335 84.5 332 74.7 348 67.2Granville 716 83.4 4 * 6 * 249 70.3 50 90.0 19 94.7 388 90.2 344 86.6 372 80.4Guilford 5,509 76.8 26 80.8 289 78.9 2,394 64.2 421 70.5 215 82.8 2,164 91.0 2,601 81.0 2,908 73.0Harnett 1,392 83.5 11 90.9 4 * 416 76.2 145 76.6 60 86.7 756 88.5 680 87.9 712 79.2Johnston 2,299 87.3 11 * 13 * 474 75.1 298 76.2 70 94.3 1,433 93.2 1,166 90.6 1,133 84.0Lee 715 71.0 4 * 9 88.9 166 63.9 169 57.4 24 66.7 343 81.0 341 73.0 374 69.3Nash-Rocky Mount 1,390 76.9 6 66.7 17 88.2 753 70.5 83 67.5 21 81.0 510 87.5 678 81.4 712 72.6Orange 585 84.4 1 * 3 * 133 72.2 39 66.7 13 76.9 396 90.4 305 86.2 280 82.5Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 915 87.4 0 -- 117 86.3 129 59.7 77 66.2 36 94.4 556 >=95% 440 88.2 475 86.7Person 405 78.5 3 * 2 * 147 70.1 20 60.0 7 71.4 226 85.4 186 82.8 219 74.9Randolph 1,475 87.7 9 44.4 14 78.6 62 82.3 141 80.9 30 93.3 1,219 89.0 720 91.4 755 84.1Asheboro City 365 76.2 2 * 4 * 57 59.6 112 62.5 12 75.0 178 89.3 158 80.4 207 72.9Rockingham 1,122 85.8 0 -- 6 50.0 261 78.5 72 68.1 38 94.7 745 89.9 538 87.4 584 84.4Vance 542 73.6 0 -- 3 * 357 67.8 47 83.0 7 85.7 128 85.9 261 77.8 281 69.8Wake 10,587 86.2 33 87.9 548 92.9 3,152 75.5 1,141 72.2 418 87.3 5,295 94.8 5,070 88.2 5,517 84.3Warren 225 75.1 13 84.6 0 -- 144 68.8 8 87.5 6 83.3 54 87.0 104 85.6 121 66.1Wilson 959 76.6 1 * 11 72.7 471 67.5 77 77.9 9 44.4 390 88.2 465 80.2 494 73.3River Mill Academy** 44 88.6 0 -- 1 * 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 39 89.7 26 88.5 18 88.9Clover Garden** 38 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 0 -- 34 >=95% 25 92.0 13 *Chatham Charter** 18 * 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 0 -- 1 * 12 * 8 * 10 *Woods Charter** 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 18 94.4 6 83.3 14 *Maureen Joy** 22 86.4 0 -- 0 -- 17 82.4 3 * 1 * 1 * 13 84.6 9 88.9Healthy Start** 32 68.8 0 -- 0 -- 30 66.7 0 -- 1 * 1 * 18 72.2 14 64.3Carter Community** 22 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 22 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8 * 14 *Kestrel Heights** 74 74.3 0 -- 2 * 30 56.7 5 60.0 6 * 31 87.1 32 81.3 42 69.0Research Triangle** 48 70.8 1 * 1 * 41 68.3 1 * 1 * 3 * 23 69.6 25 72.0Omuteko Gwamaziima** 7 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 7 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 3 *Crosscreek Charter School** 7 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 6 33.3


White FemaleAsian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial

Central Region

Table 18k. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test

MaleTotal American Indian

57


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 1,641 72.5 2,588 88.2 33,316 70.1 10,086 71.1 3,214 85.5 61,979 90.0 54,974 85.2 57,850 79.0

Central Region 36,022 82.0 157 83.4 1,151 87.5 11,978 70.6 3,748 70.3 1,183 86.1 17,805 91.5 17,398 85.3 18,624 78.9

Greensboro Academy** 77 >=95% 0 -- 4 * 3 * 0 -- 1 * 69 >=95% 43 >=95% 34 >=95%

Guilford Prep Academy** 20 75.0 0 -- 0 -- 16 68.8 0 -- 1 * 3 * 9 55.6 11 90.9

Provisions Academy** 11 63.6 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 1 * 0 -- 6 33.3 8 62.5 3 *

Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 90 87.8 1 * 2 * 57 86.0 3 * 3 * 24 >=95% 43 90.7 47 85.1

Orange Charter** 24 87.5 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 1 * 22 86.4 9 88.9 15 86.7

Roxboro Community** 79 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 14 92.9 0 -- 1 * 64 >=95% 46 >=95% 33 >=95%

Bethany Community** 29 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 28 >=95% 15 * 14 92.9

Vance Charter** 42 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 0 -- 0 -- 37 >=95% 20 >=95% 22 >=95%

Exploris** 59 >=95% 1 * 3 * 8 * 2 * 2 * 43 >=95% 33 >=95% 26 >=95%

Magellan** 66 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 4 * 2 * 0 -- 57 >=95% 30 >=95% 36 >=95%

Sterling Montessori** 23 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 13 * 12 * 11 *

Franklin Academy** 98 >=95% 1 * 1 * 6 * 2 * 2 * 86 >=95% 52 >=95% 46 >=95%

East Wake Academy** 76 76.3 1 * 1 * 13 69.2 2 * 0 -- 59 76.3 39 79.5 37 73.0

SPARC Academy** 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 11 * 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 8 *

PreEminent** 19 68.4 0 -- 0 -- 17 64.7 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 10 60.0 9 77.8

Quest Academy** 12 * 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 10 * 5 * 7 *

Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 17 94.1 16 93.8 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 11 90.9

S.B. Howard** 48 60.4 0 -- 0 -- 32 59.4 14 71.4 0 -- 2 * 29 69.0 19 47.4


General Test

Hispanic Multi-Racial FemaleBlack White


Total American Indian

for the Class of 2012, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Ethnicity, and GenderCentral Region (continued)

Asian Male

58








Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Central Region 36,022 82.0 1,671 66.4 34,351 82.7 1,640 66.9 0 -- 36 44.4 35,986 82.0Alamance-Burlington 1,790 77.9 256 60.2 1,534 80.8 255 60.0 0 -- 1 * 1,789 77.9Caswell 258 88.4 258 88.4 0 -- 258 88.4 0 -- 0 -- 258 88.4Chatham 598 86.5 141 77.3 457 89.3 140 77.9 0 -- 4 * 594 86.9Durham 2,361 74.6 0 -- 2,361 74.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,361 74.6Franklin 680 70.9 2 * 678 71.1 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 678 71.1Granville 716 83.4 0 -- 716 83.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 716 83.4Guilford 5,509 76.8 832 57.3 4,677 80.2 832 57.3 0 -- 0 -- 5,509 76.8Harnett 1,392 83.5 3 * 1,389 83.5 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,389 83.5Johnston 2,299 87.3 74 86.5 2,225 87.4 63 90.5 0 -- 13 69.2 2,286 87.4Lee 715 71.0 2 * 713 71.2 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 713 71.2Nash-Rocky Mount 1,390 76.9 3 * 1,387 77.0 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,387 77.0Orange 585 84.4 0 -- 585 84.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 585 84.4Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 915 87.4 0 -- 915 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 915 87.4Person 405 78.5 0 -- 405 78.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 405 78.559 Randolph 1,475 87.7 2 * 1,473 87.8 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,473 87.8Asheboro City 365 76.2 0 -- 365 76.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 365 76.2Rockingham 1,122 85.8 4 * 1,118 86.0 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 1,118 86.0Vance 542 73.6 2 * 540 73.7 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 540 73.7Wake 10,587 86.2 0 -- 10,587 86.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10,587 86.2Warren 225 75.1 0 -- 225 75.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 225 75.1Wilson 959 76.6 92 79.3 867 76.4 92 79.3 0 -- 0 -- 959 76.6River Mill Academy** 44 88.6 0 -- 44 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 44 88.6Clover Garden** 38 94.7 0 -- 38 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 38 94.7Chatham Charter** 18 * 0 -- 18 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 18 *Woods Charter** 20 >=95% 0 -- 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 20 >=95%Maureen Joy** 22 86.4 0 -- 22 86.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 22 86.4Healthy Start** 32 68.8 0 -- 32 68.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 32 68.8Carter Community** 22 >=95% 0 -- 22 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 22 >=95%Kestrel Heights** 74 74.3 0 -- 74 74.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 74 74.3Research Triangle** 48 70.8 0 -- 48 70.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 48 70.8Omuteko Gwamaziima** 7 42.9 0 -- 7 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7 42.9Crosscreek Charter School** 7 42.9 0 -- 7 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7 42.9


Table 18l. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1


General Test


Central Region


Program








Percent Passing

State 112,824 82.0 16,497 76.8 96,327 82.9 15,982 77.1 452 70.1 89 52.8 112,735 82.0Central Region 36,022 82.0 1,671 66.4 34,351 82.7 1,640 66.9 0 -- 36 44.4 35,986 82.0

Greensboro Academy** 77 >=95% 0 -- 77 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 77 >=95%Guilford Prep Academy** 20 75.0 0 -- 20 75.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 20 75.0Provisions Academy** 11 63.6 0 -- 11 63.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 11 63.6Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 90 87.8 0 -- 90 87.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 90 87.8Orange Charter** 24 87.5 0 -- 24 87.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 24 87.5Roxboro Community** 79 >=95% 0 -- 79 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 79 >=95%Bethany Community** 29 >=95% 0 -- 29 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 29 >=95%Vance Charter** 42 >=95% 0 -- 42 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 42 >=95%Exploris** 59 >=95% 0 -- 59 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 59 >=95%Magellan** 66 >=95% 0 -- 66 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 66 >=95%60 Sterling Montessori** 23 >=95% 0 -- 23 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 23 >=95%Franklin Academy** 98 >=95% 0 -- 98 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 98 >=95%East Wake Academy** 76 76.3 0 -- 76 76.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 76.3SPARC Academy** 12 * 0 -- 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 *PreEminent** 19 68.4 0 -- 19 68.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 19 68.4Quest Academy** 12 * 0 -- 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 *Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 17 94.1 0 -- 17 94.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 17 94.1S.B. Howard** 48 60.4 0 -- 48 60.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 48 60.4Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Central Region (continued)


Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Not Migrant

General Test












Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1

Western Region 8,616 84.8 127 83.5 74 86.5 544 69.1 476 68.7 226 82.7 7,169 87.1 4,165 87.6 4,451 82.2

Buncombe 2,332 88.4 8 * 22 86.4 157 75.8 158 74.1 80 87.5 1,907 90.6 1,124 90.7 1,208 86.3

Asheville City 343 76.4 0 -- 4 * 130 66.9 19 68.4 22 81.8 168 83.3 172 82.6 171 70.2

Cherokee County 319 90.9 5 80.0 4 * 7 85.7 8 * 7 85.7 288 91.0 172 91.9 147 89.8

Clay 110 85.5 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 107 86.0 55 87.3 55 83.6

Graham 102 93.1 12 * 1 * 0 -- 1 * 1 * 87 93.1 47 >=95% 55 89.1

Haywood 753 88.6 9 88.9 3 * 6 83.3 19 73.7 17 82.4 699 89.4 346 90.2 407 87.2

Henderson 1,089 83.8 4 * 10 90.0 48 62.5 119 64.7 42 83.3 866 87.6 529 85.8 560 82.0

Jackson 283 85.2 31 90.3 2 * 0 -- 16 56.3 0 -- 234 86.3 144 87.5 139 82.7

Macon 397 84.6 1 * 3 * 3 * 27 48.1 2 * 361 87.3 203 90.1 194 78.9

Madison 234 86.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 83.3 0 -- 228 86.8 102 92.2 132 82.6

McDowell 545 84.0 2 * 9 88.9 15 86.7 29 75.9 9 88.9 481 84.2 285 86.7 260 81.2

Mitchell 187 87.2 0 -- 1 * 1 * 6 66.7 0 -- 179 88.3 77 90.9 110 84.5

Polk 220 89.5 0 -- 1 * 19 84.2 11 54.5 5 * 184 91.8 99 88.9 121 90.1

Rutherford 808 68.7 2 * 2 * 135 58.5 32 59.4 24 58.3 613 71.9 386 73.6 422 64.2

Swain 225 73.3 52 73.1 3 * 0 -- 6 83.3 0 -- 164 73.2 107 79.4 118 67.8

Transylvania 378 86.5 1 * 4 * 17 70.6 10 70.0 17 88.2 329 87.8 185 89.2 193 83.9

Yancey 215 94.9 0 -- 4 * 2 * 5 * 0 -- 204 94.6 91 >=95% 124 94.4

Thomas Jefferson** 76 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 2 * 0 -- 70 >=95% 41 >=95% 35 >=95%




General Test

Multi-Racial WhiteTotal American Indian

Western Region

Asian Black Hispanic Female Male

61


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Western Region 8,616 84.8 522 89.1 8,094 84.5 513 89.5 0 -- 9 66.7 8,607 84.8

Buncombe 2,332 88.4 3 * 2,329 88.4 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 2,329 88.4

Asheville City 343 76.4 0 -- 343 76.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 343 76.4

Cherokee County 319 90.9 319 90.9 0 -- 319 90.9 0 -- 0 -- 319 90.9

Clay 110 85.5 0 -- 110 85.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 110 85.5

Graham 102 93.1 0 -- 102 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 102 93.1

Haywood 753 88.6 3 * 750 88.7 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 750 88.7

Henderson 1,089 83.8 2 * 1,087 83.8 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,087 83.8

Jackson 283 85.2 1 * 282 85.1 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 282 85.1

Macon 397 84.6 7 85.7 390 84.6 7 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 397 84.6

Madison 234 86.8 0 -- 234 86.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 234 86.8

McDowell 545 84.0 0 -- 545 84.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 545 84.0

Mitchell 187 87.2 187 87.2 0 -- 187 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 187 87.262 Polk 220 89.5 0 -- 220 89.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 220 89.5

Rutherford 808 68.7 0 -- 808 68.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 808 68.7

Swain 225 73.3 0 -- 225 73.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 225 73.3

Transylvania 378 86.5 0 -- 378 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 378 86.5

Yancey 215 94.9 0 -- 215 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 215 94.9

Thomas Jefferson** 76 >=95% 0 -- 76 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 >=95%





Migrant Not MigrantTargeted AssistanceTotal Served by Title I Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program










Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1


Alexander 476 90.1 0 -- 16 93.8 27 77.8 31 80.6 2 * 400 91.8 210 92.4 266 88.3

Alleghany 133 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 16 68.8 7 71.4 106 90.6 58 94.8 75 80.0

Ashe 268 94.4 1 * 0 -- 2 * 16 68.8 5 * 244 >=95% 119 >=95% 149 91.9

Avery 228 92.5 1 * 1 * 0 -- 15 60.0 1 * 210 94.8 101 >=95% 127 90.6

Burke 1,136 91.0 3 * 103 92.2 66 77.3 72 81.9 28 92.9 864 92.6 539 93.7 597 88.6

Caldwell 1,148 87.5 0 -- 8 87.5 68 91.2 62 61.3 25 88.0 985 88.9 572 90.2 576 84.9

Catawba 1,610 91.1 7 * 112 90.2 131 85.5 132 80.3 50 94.0 1,178 92.9 776 93.3 834 89.1

Hickory City 411 74.7 3 * 22 72.7 105 63.8 62 62.9 18 61.1 201 85.6 217 74.7 194 74.7

Newton-Conover City 207 87.4 1 * 10 * 41 75.6 30 80.0 5 * 120 91.7 96 87.5 111 87.4

Davidson 1,776 88.8 6 83.3 25 >=95% 90 71.1 65 78.5 18 83.3 1,572 90.2 842 91.1 934 86.7

Lexington City 298 65.8 1 * 15 66.7 126 67.5 71 49.3 14 78.6 71 76.1 122 68.9 176 63.6

Thomasville City 228 72.4 2 * 2 * 100 70.0 49 71.4 11 90.9 64 73.4 110 77.3 118 67.8

Davie 550 94.0 1 * 1 * 49 93.9 58 81.0 20 >=95% 421 >=95% 242 94.2 308 93.8

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 4,509 84.9 12 83.3 71 85.9 1,711 78.0 570 71.2 138 92.0 2,007 94.2 2,215 86.9 2,294 83.0

Iredell-Statesville 1,881 86.7 5 * 41 87.8 280 73.6 145 64.8 28 92.9 1,382 91.4 902 90.8 979 82.8

Mooresville City 449 85.3 0 -- 6 * 87 78.2 25 52.0 3 * 328 89.3 233 87.1 216 83.3

Stokes 593 88.2 2 * 2 * 24 83.3 17 76.5 15 86.7 533 88.9 270 92.2 323 84.8

Surry 765 90.5 1 * 6 * 29 89.7 86 82.6 7 71.4 636 91.8 357 93.3 408 88.0

Elkin City 112 92.0 0 -- 0 -- 8 87.5 16 81.3 1 * 87 94.3 59 >=95% 53 86.8

Mount Airy City 134 92.5 0 -- 5 * 11 81.8 17 88.2 5 * 96 93.8 72 >=95% 62 87.1

Watauga 365 87.1 0 -- 4 * 6 * 14 50.0 9 88.9 332 88.3 162 87.7 203 86.7

Wilkes 896 91.6 1 * 2 * 61 85.2 72 75.0 18 88.9 742 93.8 444 92.8 452 90.5

Yadkin 549 >=95% 2 * 2 * 18 88.9 78 91.0 11 * 438 >=95% 241 >=95% 308 >=95%

Grandfather Academy** 4 * 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 2 * 2 *

Crossnore Academy** 14 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 12 41.7 8 50.0 6 33.3

Quality Education** 13 46.2 0 -- 0 -- 13 46.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8 37.5 5 60.0

C.G. Woodson** 20 60.0 0 -- 0 -- 16 62.5 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 11 54.5 9 66.7


White

Northwest Region

Total



General Test

American Indian Asian Female MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial

63


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Northwest Region 18,773 87.5 91 49.5 18,682 87.7 71 46.5 15 60.0 5 60.0 18,768 87.5

Alexander 476 90.1 0 -- 476 90.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 476 90.1Alleghany 133 86.5 0 -- 133 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 133 86.5Ashe 268 94.4 2 * 266 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 266 >=95%Avery 228 92.5 0 -- 228 92.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 228 92.5Burke 1,136 91.0 0 -- 1,136 91.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,136 91.0Caldwell 1,148 87.5 25 72.0 1,123 87.9 25 72.0 0 -- 0 -- 1,148 87.5Catawba 1,610 91.1 0 -- 1,610 91.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,610 91.1Hickory City 411 74.7 22 45.5 389 76.3 22 45.5 0 -- 0 -- 411 74.7Newton-Conover City 207 87.4 0 -- 207 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 207 87.4Davidson 1,776 88.8 0 -- 1,776 88.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,776 88.8Lexington City 298 65.8 0 -- 298 65.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 298 65.8Thomasville City 228 72.4 0 -- 228 72.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 228 72.4Davie 550 94.0 0 -- 550 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 550 94.0Winston-Salem/Forsyth 4,509 84.9 26 38.5 4,483 85.2 11 9.1 15 60.0 0 -- 4,509 84.9Iredell-Statesville 1,881 86.7 13 30.8 1,868 87.0 13 30.8 0 -- 0 -- 1,881 86.7Mooresville City 449 85.3 0 -- 449 85.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 449 85.3Stokes 593 88.2 0 -- 593 88.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 593 88.2Surry 765 90.5 3 * 762 90.4 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 762 90.4Elkin City 112 92.0 0 -- 112 92.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 112 92.0Mount Airy City 134 92.5 0 -- 134 92.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 134 92.5Watauga 365 87.1 0 -- 365 87.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 365 87.1Wilkes 896 91.6 0 -- 896 91.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 896 91.6Yadkin 549 >=95% 0 -- 549 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 549 >=95%Grandfather Academy** 4 * 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 *Crossnore Academy** 14 42.9 0 -- 14 42.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 42.9Quality Education** 13 46.2 0 -- 13 46.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 46.2C.G. Woodson** 20 60.0 0 -- 20 60.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 20 60.0


64

General Test


Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Not Migrant


for the Class of 2011, at the End of Grade 9, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsNorthwest Region










Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1


Anson 384 64.6 1 * 8 87.5 265 57.0 6 50.0 7 71.4 97 84.5 181 72.9 203 57.1

Cabarrus 2,437 89.5 7 85.7 40 87.5 476 80.5 236 76.7 77 89.6 1,601 94.1 1,158 91.2 1,279 88.0

Kannapolis City 419 78.8 1 * 3 * 138 69.6 83 65.1 9 77.8 185 91.4 178 83.7 241 75.1

Cleveland 1,730 82.0 1 * 9 88.9 553 72.5 42 73.8 34 82.4 1,091 87.2 795 87.0 935 77.8

Gaston 2,870 87.2 8 87.5 30 >=95% 592 78.7 173 79.2 55 80.0 2,012 90.5 1,374 88.9 1,496 85.8

Hoke 548 87.0 54 94.4 5 * 255 83.1 61 73.8 17 82.4 156 >=95% 252 88.5 296 85.8

Lincoln 1,035 88.6 4 * 2 * 61 70.5 96 82.3 22 >=95% 850 90.5 454 93.0 581 85.2

Charlotte/Mecklenburg 11,077 72.1 63 69.8 528 73.9 5,178 65.6 1,546 59.6 248 73.0 3,514 86.8 5,345 75.2 5,732 69.2

Montgomery 402 71.9 0 -- 8 87.5 117 66.7 90 62.2 6 83.3 181 79.0 198 74.7 204 69.1

Moore 1,114 91.3 10 80.0 9 * 256 85.5 79 84.8 25 88.0 735 94.1 517 92.6 597 90.1

Richmond 625 85.8 32 90.6 5 * 263 76.0 24 87.5 5 * 296 93.2 315 87.9 310 83.5

Rowan-Salisbury 1,915 83.0 6 * 24 75.0 452 69.0 139 65.5 50 80.0 1,244 90.2 899 86.0 1,016 80.3

Scotland 589 83.9 91 85.7 5 * 279 77.1 4 * 6 66.7 204 92.6 281 89.7 308 78.6

Stanly 810 94.2 6 * 25 >=95% 142 85.9 34 88.2 12 91.7 591 >=95% 364 >=95% 446 93.5

Union 2,917 72.8 8 62.5 35 85.7 481 53.0 280 58.2 62 72.6 2,051 79.3 1,405 76.2 1,512 69.8

Carolina International** 33 78.8 0 -- 3 * 9 77.8 1 * 1 * 19 78.9 13 84.6 20 75.0

Piedmont Community** 38 92.1 0 -- 0 -- 7 * 0 -- 2 * 29 93.1 15 93.3 23 91.3

Lincoln Charter** 58 91.4 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 55 90.9 30 90.0 28 92.9

Kennedy Charter** 49 30.6 0 -- 0 -- 48 31.3 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 18 55.6 31 16.1

Lake Norman** 108 75.0 0 -- 4 * 15 66.7 2 * 2 * 85 76.5 49 69.4 59 79.7

Crossroads Charter** 62 38.7 0 -- 0 -- 60 38.3 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 40 40.0 22 36.4

Queen's Grant** 71 90.1 1 * 0 -- 12 75.0 1 * 0 -- 57 93.0 42 90.5 29 89.7

Laurinburg Homework** 18 44.4 1 * 0 -- 15 53.3 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 9 55.6 9 33.3

Gray Stone Day** 69 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 1 * 64 90.6 41 >=95% 28 85.7

Union Academy** 68 94.1 2 * 0 -- 10 * 4 * 0 -- 52 92.3 37 91.9 31 >=95%




General Test

Female MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal American Indian Asian

Southwest Region

65


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Southwest Region 29,446 79.2 87 82.8 29,359 79.1 79 84.8 0 -- 8 62.5 29,438 79.2Anson 384 64.6 0 -- 384 64.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 384 64.6Cabarrus 2,437 89.5 0 -- 2,437 89.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,437 89.5Kannapolis City 419 78.8 0 -- 419 78.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 419 78.8Cleveland 1,730 82.0 0 -- 1,730 82.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,730 82.0Gaston 2,870 87.2 0 -- 2,870 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,870 87.2Hoke 548 87.0 7 57.1 541 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 7 57.1 541 87.4Lincoln 1,035 88.6 0 -- 1,035 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,035 88.6Charlotte/Mecklenburg 11,077 72.1 0 -- 11,077 72.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 11,077 72.1Montgomery 402 71.9 0 -- 402 71.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 402 71.9Moore 1,114 91.3 0 -- 1,114 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,114 91.3Richmond 625 85.8 78 85.9 547 85.7 78 85.9 0 -- 0 -- 625 85.8Rowan-Salisbury 1,915 83.0 1 * 1,914 83.0 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,914 83.0Scotland 589 83.9 1 * 588 84.0 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 589 83.9Stanly 810 94.2 0 -- 810 94.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 810 94.2Union 2,917 72.8 0 -- 2,917 72.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,917 72.8Carolina International** 33 78.8 0 -- 33 78.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 33 78.8Piedmont Community** 38 92.1 0 -- 38 92.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 38 92.1Lincoln Charter** 58 91.4 0 -- 58 91.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 58 91.4Kennedy Charter** 49 30.6 0 -- 49 30.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 49 30.6Lake Norman** 108 75.0 0 -- 108 75.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 108 75.0Crossroads Charter** 62 38.7 0 -- 62 38.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 62 38.7Queen's Grant** 71 90.1 0 -- 71 90.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 71 90.1Laurinburg Homework** 18 44.4 0 -- 18 44.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 18 44.4Gray Stone Day** 69 91.3 0 -- 69 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 69 91.3Union Academy** 68 94.1 0 -- 68 94.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 68 94.1


Targeted Assistance Migrant

Southwest Region

Not Migrant

66




General TestSchoolwide Title I

Program


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1


Beaufort 699 46.9 1 * 0 -- 299 43.8 38 31.6 8 62.5 353 50.7 347 48.1 352 45.7

Bertie 296 52.7 1 * 0 -- 261 54.0 0 -- 3 * 31 48.4 131 58.8 165 47.9

Camden 156 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 22 >=95% 3 * 3 * 125 >=95% 76 >=95% 80 93.8

Edenton/Chowan 213 93.4 0 -- 2 * 108 91.7 5 60.0 2 * 96 >=95% 91 >=95% 122 91.8

Currituck 354 85.9 0 -- 1 * 15 73.3 8 87.5 11 72.7 319 86.8 166 87.3 188 84.6

Dare 420 88.6 0 -- 1 * 17 88.2 25 52.0 7 85.7 370 91.4 194 90.7 226 86.7

Edgecombe 710 70.1 0 -- 0 -- 445 63.8 30 70.0 6 33.3 229 83.4 325 76.0 385 65.2

Gates 192 86.5 0 -- 1 * 80 82.5 1 * 2 * 108 89.8 94 92.6 98 80.6

Halifax 491 71.9 30 76.7 0 -- 443 71.3 4 * 3 * 11 81.8 217 79.7 274 65.7

Roanoke Rapids City 286 83.6 1 * 4 * 66 68.2 10 80.0 8 75.0 197 88.8 136 87.5 150 80.0

Weldon City 136 75.7 0 -- 0 -- 133 75.2 0 -- 1 * 2 * 63 82.5 73 69.9

Hertford 301 57.8 1 * 0 -- 253 54.9 5 60.0 2 * 40 72.5 141 70.2 160 46.9

Hyde 57 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 21 90.5 4 * 1 * 31 80.6 34 88.2 23 78.3

Martin 360 28.1 1 * 0 -- 211 23.7 11 27.3 4 * 133 35.3 156 23.1 204 31.9

Northampton 269 75.8 0 -- 0 -- 229 74.2 0 -- 2 * 38 86.8 124 83.9 145 69.0

Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 578 76.8 0 -- 5 60.0 281 65.5 15 53.3 16 87.5 261 90.0 273 82.1 305 72.1

Perquimans 167 86.8 0 -- 2 * 56 83.9 1 * 1 * 107 87.9 74 90.5 93 83.9

Pitt 2,225 67.3 2 * 31 64.5 1,171 55.0 122 63.1 46 80.4 853 84.3 1,082 72.1 1,143 62.8

Tyrrell 55 87.3 0 -- 0 -- 26 88.5 6 83.3 0 -- 23 87.0 29 86.2 26 88.5

Washington 183 70.5 1 * 1 * 128 64.1 2 * 5 * 46 87.0 77 81.8 106 62.3

Gaston College Prep** 87 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 78 88.5 2 * 3 * 4 * 45 88.9 42 90.5


Northeast Region

American Indian Asian



General Test

Female MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal

67


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship


Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Northeast Region 8,235 69.7 366 27.6 7,869 71.6 360 28.1 0 -- 6 * 8,229 69.7Beaufort 699 46.9 0 -- 699 46.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 699 46.9Bertie 296 52.7 0 -- 296 52.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 296 52.7Camden 156 >=95% 0 -- 156 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 156 >=95%Edenton/Chowan 213 93.4 0 -- 213 93.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 213 93.4Currituck 354 85.9 0 -- 354 85.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 354 85.9Dare 420 88.6 0 -- 420 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 420 88.6Edgecombe 710 70.1 0 -- 710 70.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 710 70.1Gates 192 86.5 0 -- 192 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 192 86.5Halifax 491 71.9 0 -- 491 71.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 491 71.9Roanoke Rapids City 286 83.6 0 -- 286 83.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 286 83.6Weldon City 136 75.7 0 -- 136 75.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 136 75.7Hertford 301 57.8 0 -- 301 57.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 301 57.8Hyde 57 84.2 0 -- 57 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 57 84.2Martin 360 28.1 360 28.1 0 -- 360 28.1 0 -- 0 -- 360 28.1Northampton 269 75.8 1 * 268 76.1 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 268 76.1Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 578 76.8 0 -- 578 76.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 578 76.8Perquimans 167 86.8 0 -- 167 86.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 167 86.8Pitt 2,225 67.3 5 * 2,220 67.5 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 2,220 67.5Tyrrell 55 87.3 0 -- 55 87.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 55 87.3Washington 183 70.5 0 -- 183 70.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 183 70.5Gaston College Prep** 87 89.7 0 -- 87 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 87 89.7


for the Class of 2011, at the End of Grade 9, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsNortheast Region

68


Program

General Test



Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1

Southeast Region 20,956 83.3 1,086 70.5 228 73.7 7,704 78.1 1,445 74.7 605 88.1 9,888 90.0 10,002 86.8 10,954 80.1

Bladen 438 67.4 6 66.7 2 * 204 67.6 32 56.3 2 * 192 69.8 212 72.6 226 62.4

Brunswick 1,240 89.5 18 77.8 8 75.0 271 85.2 67 77.6 34 94.1 842 92.0 585 92.3 655 87.0

Carteret 720 93.1 2 * 4 * 62 82.3 22 50.0 13 92.3 617 >=95% 311 93.6 409 92.7

Columbus 547 83.4 26 88.5 1 * 207 77.3 28 89.3 5 80.0 280 86.8 263 90.5 284 76.8

Whiteville City 202 71.3 1 * 3 * 95 63.2 4 * 5 * 94 80.9 100 76.0 102 66.7

Craven 1,410 88.7 2 * 41 48.8 498 84.5 63 85.7 40 87.5 766 93.9 630 91.7 780 86.3

Cumberland 4,681 88.8 67 92.5 77 88.3 2,389 85.9 326 85.3 170 >=95% 1,652 93.0 2,305 91.0 2,376 86.7

Duplin 742 86.0 1 * 1 * 247 82.6 156 80.1 11 81.8 326 91.7 364 86.5 378 85.4

Greene 269 69.1 0 -- 1 * 123 56.9 44 56.8 5 80.0 96 89.6 125 75.2 144 63.9

Jones 116 81.0 1 * 2 * 63 76.2 3 * 1 * 46 89.1 56 82.1 60 80.0

Lenoir 954 69.5 1 * 4 * 516 60.5 46 65.2 13 76.9 374 81.8 427 77.3 527 63.2

New Hanover 2,080 88.2 8 87.5 21 71.4 607 80.7 74 71.6 66 86.4 1,304 93.0 1,002 90.0 1,078 86.5

Onslow 1,832 84.8 12 83.3 22 86.4 412 77.2 97 75.3 138 86.2 1,151 88.2 928 89.0 904 80.5

Pamlico 158 88.6 2 * 0 -- 35 88.6 0 -- 4 * 117 88.9 73 87.7 85 89.4

Pender 746 83.1 3 * 1 * 179 78.2 68 58.8 18 94.4 477 88.1 352 86.9 394 79.7

Robeson 2,163 66.3 914 67.1 11 72.7 718 61.8 107 57.0 22 72.7 391 74.9 1,015 71.8 1,148 61.5

Sampson 722 86.7 10 90.0 2 * 230 83.9 141 80.1 7 71.4 332 91.9 343 90.4 379 83.4

Clinton City 245 91.8 9 * 1 * 114 89.5 36 88.9 2 * 83 >=95% 118 92.4 127 91.3

Wayne 1,660 81.0 3 * 26 73.1 727 75.1 130 65.4 49 83.7 725 89.8 779 85.6 881 76.8

Cape Lookout Marine** 31 45.2 0 -- 0 -- 7 57.1 1 * 0 -- 23 43.5 14 50.0 17 41.2


Southeast Region




General Test

Female MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal

69








Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Southeast Region 20,956 83.3 2,891 70.3 18,065 85.4 2,872 70.4 0 -- 27 63.0 20,929 83.3Bladen 438 67.4 2 * 436 67.7 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 436 67.7Brunswick 1,240 89.5 5 40.0 1,235 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 5 40.0 1,235 89.7Carteret 720 93.1 0 -- 720 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 720 93.1Columbus 547 83.4 547 83.4 0 -- 547 83.4 0 -- 3 * 544 83.3Whiteville City 202 71.3 15 53.3 187 72.7 12 50.0 0 -- 3 * 199 71.4Craven 1,410 88.7 0 -- 1,410 88.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,410 88.7Cumberland 4,681 88.8 160 86.3 4,521 88.9 160 86.3 0 -- 0 -- 4,681 88.8Duplin 742 86.0 3 * 739 85.9 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 739 85.9Greene 269 69.1 0 -- 269 69.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 269 69.1Jones 116 81.0 0 -- 116 81.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 116 81.0Lenoir 954 69.5 15 46.7 939 69.9 15 46.7 0 -- 0 -- 954 69.5New Hanover 2,080 88.2 0 -- 2,080 88.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,080 88.2Onslow 1,832 84.8 0 -- 1,832 84.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,832 84.8Pamlico 158 88.6 0 -- 158 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 158 88.6Pender 746 83.1 2 * 744 83.2 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 744 83.2Robeson 2,163 66.3 2,138 66.1 25 84.0 2,138 66.1 0 -- 5 80.0 2,158 66.3Sampson 722 86.7 4 * 718 86.9 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 718 86.9Clinton City 245 91.8 0 -- 245 91.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 245 91.8Wayne 1,660 81.0 0 -- 1,660 81.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,660 81.0Cape Lookout Marine** 31 45.2 0 -- 31 45.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 31 45.2



Program

General Test


for the Class of 2011, at the End of Grade 9, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsSoutheast Region

70


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 1,808 74.9 2,846 79.6 39,994 70.4 11,239 68.3 3,219 82.5 68,019 88.9 60,411 83.6 66,714 78.1Central Region 41,099 78.7 210 78.6 1,296 77.9 14,643 68.9 4,397 67.1 1,172 79.6 19,381 88.8 19,371 81.4 21,728 76.3

Alamance-Burlington 2,073 75.3 7 85.7 35 80.0 541 69.1 330 53.6 40 72.5 1,120 84.5 941 78.7 1,132 72.3Caswell 282 80.1 1 * 0 -- 102 74.5 11 81.8 7 85.7 161 83.2 123 84.6 159 76.7Chatham 590 83.1 2 * 5 80.0 110 77.3 129 65.1 20 >=95% 324 91.4 261 84.7 329 81.8Durham 3,318 54.9 8 62.5 64 65.6 2,034 51.1 416 32.7 109 71.6 687 75.5 1,545 56.8 1,773 53.2Franklin 741 89.5 2 * 4 * 294 87.4 67 71.6 9 88.9 365 94.2 327 92.0 414 87.4Granville 950 87.4 6 * 6 * 408 80.1 63 81.0 17 94.1 450 94.2 455 92.5 495 82.6Guilford 6,516 75.3 48 75.0 372 66.1 2,843 66.2 475 60.2 238 73.1 2,540 89.9 3,151 79.8 3,365 71.1Harnett 1,624 66.4 27 59.3 5 60.0 495 63.6 153 66.7 64 56.3 880 69.0 791 68.9 833 64.1Johnston 2,330 89.2 6 66.7 15 86.7 485 79.4 317 76.3 70 92.9 1,437 >=95% 1,133 91.9 1,197 86.6Lee 1,269 78.6 9 77.8 7 85.7 215 64.7 576 85.8 18 72.2 444 76.1 431 73.1 838 81.4Nash-Rocky Mount 1,526 80.6 9 77.8 17 82.4 866 73.8 74 75.7 22 77.3 538 92.4 716 85.2 810 76.5Orange 633 77.3 0 -- 5 80.0 164 67.1 40 62.5 10 40.0 414 83.6 298 79.9 335 74.9Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 1,060 82.7 1 * 148 64.9 192 76.0 111 65.8 45 91.1 563 92.4 522 81.4 538 84.0Person 498 88.0 3 * 0 -- 203 81.8 13 61.5 6 83.3 273 93.8 247 92.3 251 83.7Randolph 1,644 86.4 11 90.9 19 84.2 65 78.5 149 81.9 38 81.6 1,362 87.4 783 89.3 861 83.7Asheboro City 360 87.5 0 -- 16 93.8 50 76.0 81 80.2 13 * 200 92.0 164 90.9 196 84.7Rockingham 1,313 83.1 2 * 11 81.8 342 73.1 71 81.7 33 84.8 854 87.1 608 86.7 705 80.0Vance 821 53.7 2 * 1 * 567 51.3 51 43.1 3 * 197 62.9 380 58.2 441 49.9Wake 11,517 84.7 29 86.2 528 88.6 3,725 75.9 1,153 69.8 381 84.5 5,701 93.0 5,460 86.4 6,057 83.1Warren 287 65.9 14 85.7 0 -- 223 63.7 8 50.0 3 * 39 74.4 150 71.3 137 59.9Wilson 1,036 82.6 4 * 14 * 545 77.4 82 74.4 8 * 383 91.4 529 85.3 507 79.9River Mill Academy** 43 76.7 1 * 1 * 7 57.1 3 * 1 * 30 86.7 22 72.7 21 81.0Clover Garden** 28 78.6 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 1 * 26 76.9 12 83.3 16 75.0New Century Charter** 15 73.3 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 78.6 9 77.8 6 66.7Woods Charter** 43 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 1 * 38 >=95% 21 >=95% 22 >=95%Kestrel Heights** 54 72.2 0 -- 2 * 27 66.7 12 75.0 1 * 12 83.3 25 72.0 29 72.4Provisions Academy** 27 40.7 0 -- 0 -- 20 45.0 1 * 0 -- 6 16.7 10 50.0 17 35.3Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 78 79.5 2 * 2 * 54 75.9 1 * 1 * 18 83.3 35 91.4 43 69.8Pace Academy** 34 52.9 0 -- 0 -- 17 47.1 2 * 1 * 14 50.0 13 53.8 21 52.4Roxboro Community** 76 >=95% 1 * 2 * 7 * 0 -- 1 * 65 >=95% 43 >=95% 33 >=95%Franklin Academy** 78 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 2 * 0 -- 71 >=95% 42 >=95% 36 >=95%East Wake Academy** 67 88.1 2 * 1 * 12 83.3 2 * 1 * 49 89.8 39 89.7 28 85.7Raleigh Charter HS** 137 >=95% 0 -- 15 93.3 13 84.6 3 * 10 * 96 >=95% 73 >=95% 64 >=95%Community Partners High** 17 82.4 0 -- 0 -- 7 57.1 0 -- 0 -- 10 * 8 75.0 9 88.9Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 14 85.7 13 92.3 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 10 90.0


Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White



General TestTotal American Indian

Central Region

Female Male

71








Percent Passing

State 127,125 80.7 4,266 69.1 122,859 81.1 4,177 69.6 15 60.0 82 45.1 127,043 80.7Central Region 41,099 78.7 309 75.1 40,790 78.8 282 80.1 0 -- 27 22.2 41,072 78.8Alamance-Burlington 2,073 75.3 0 -- 2,073 75.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,073 75.3Caswell 282 80.1 282 80.1 0 -- 282 80.1 0 -- 0 -- 282 80.1Chatham 590 83.1 3 * 587 83.5 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 587 83.5Durham 3,318 54.9 0 -- 3,318 54.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3,318 54.9Franklin 741 89.5 0 -- 741 89.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 741 89.5Granville 950 87.4 0 -- 950 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 950 87.4Guilford 6,516 75.3 0 -- 6,516 75.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6,516 75.3Harnett 1,624 66.4 1 * 1,623 66.5 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,623 66.5Johnston 2,330 89.2 8 12.5 2,322 89.4 0 -- 0 -- 8 12.5 2,322 89.4Lee 1,269 78.6 7 42.9 1,262 78.8 0 -- 0 -- 7 42.9 1,262 78.8Nash-Rocky Mount 1,526 80.6 0 -- 1,526 80.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,526 80.6Orange 633 77.3 0 -- 633 77.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 633 77.3Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 1,060 82.7 0 -- 1,060 82.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,060 82.7Person 498 88.0 0 -- 498 88.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 498 88.0Randolph 1,644 86.4 3 * 1,641 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,641 86.5Asheboro City 360 87.5 0 -- 360 87.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 360 87.5Rockingham 1,313 83.1 4 * 1,309 83.3 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 1,309 83.3Vance 821 53.7 1 * 820 53.8 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 820 53.8Wake 11,517 84.7 0 -- 11,517 84.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 11,517 84.7Warren 287 65.9 0 -- 287 65.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 287 65.9Wilson 1,036 82.6 0 -- 1,036 82.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,036 82.6River Mill Academy** 43 76.7 0 -- 43 76.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 76.7Clover Garden** 28 78.6 0 -- 28 78.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 28 78.6New Century Charter** 15 73.3 0 -- 15 73.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 73.3Woods Charter** 43 >=95% 0 -- 43 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 >=95%Kestrel Heights** 54 72.2 0 -- 54 72.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 54 72.2Provisions Academy** 27 40.7 0 -- 27 40.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 27 40.7Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 78 79.5 0 -- 78 79.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 79.5Pace Academy** 34 52.9 0 -- 34 52.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 34 52.9Roxboro Community** 76 >=95% 0 -- 76 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 >=95%Franklin Academy** 78 >=95% 0 -- 78 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 >=95%East Wake Academy** 67 88.1 0 -- 67 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 67 88.1Raleigh Charter HS** 137 >=95% 0 -- 137 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 137 >=95%Community Partners High** 17 82.4 0 -- 17 82.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 17 82.4Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 14 85.7 0 -- 14 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 85.7Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Program

Central Region



General Test

72


Member-ship Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship



Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2

Western Region 7,243 89.6 116 84.5 71 94.4 443 78.1 365 83.0 146 89.0 6,102 90.9 3,629 90.8 3,614 88.5

Buncombe 1,930 93.6 10 90.0 27 >=95% 126 92.9 105 86.7 58 93.1 1,604 94.1 961 94.6 969 92.6

Asheville City 272 88.6 0 -- 6 * 76 77.6 16 93.8 15 93.3 159 92.5 139 88.5 133 88.7

Cherokee 302 93.0 4 * 0 -- 7 71.4 8 62.5 8 87.5 275 94.5 149 >=95% 153 90.2

Clay 114 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 2 * 0 -- 111 93.7 43 90.7 71 94.4

Graham 83 94.0 11 * 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 68 94.1 41 >=95% 42 92.9

Haywood 570 94.4 3 * 1 * 1 * 19 78.9 11 * 535 94.8 302 >=95% 268 93.3

Henderson 892 88.1 4 * 10 90.0 42 64.3 102 79.4 21 81.0 713 91.0 451 88.7 441 87.5

Jackson 265 91.3 14 85.7 2 * 4 * 7 85.7 1 * 237 92.0 130 93.8 135 88.9

Macon 296 94.6 3 * 8 75.0 4 * 11 81.8 0 -- 270 >=95% 153 >=95% 143 92.3

Madison 179 92.7 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 2 * 173 93.1 82 >=95% 97 89.7

McDowell 472 90.5 4 * 8 * 25 92.0 21 85.7 4 * 410 90.7 237 91.6 235 89.4

Mitchell 163 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 160 >=95% 88 >=95% 75 90.7

Polk 178 >=95% 0 -- 2 * 14 * 12 * 3 * 147 >=95% 96 >=95% 82 >=95%

Rutherford 754 65.4 1 * 4 * 121 58.7 29 72.4 11 63.6 588 66.2 393 66.9 361 63.7

Swain 215 86.5 59 81.4 1 * 1 * 7 71.4 3 * 144 88.9 94 84.0 121 88.4

Transylvania 328 93.6 2 * 1 * 16 * 8 75.0 5 80.0 296 94.3 142 >=95% 186 91.4

Yancey 174 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 3 * 6 * 2 * 162 >=95% 90 >=95% 84 94.0

Thomas Jefferson** 56 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 3 * 1 * 50 >=95% 38 >=95% 18 *


Western Region

Asian Black Hispanic Female Male



General Test

Multi-Racial WhiteTotal American Indian

73


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Western Region 7,243 89.6 482 94.2 6,761 89.3 477 94.1 0 -- 5 * 7,238 89.6

Buncombe 1,930 93.6 2 * 1,928 93.6 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,928 93.6Asheville City 272 88.6 0 -- 272 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 272 88.6Cherokee 302 93.0 302 93.0 0 -- 302 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 302 93.0Clay 114 93.0 0 -- 114 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 114 93.0Graham 83 94.0 0 -- 83 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 83 94.0Haywood 570 94.4 0 -- 570 94.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 570 94.4Henderson 892 88.1 3 * 889 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 889 88.1Jackson 265 91.3 0 -- 265 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 265 91.3Macon 296 94.6 12 * 284 94.4 12 * 0 -- 0 -- 296 94.6Madison 179 92.7 0 -- 179 92.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 179 92.7McDowell 472 90.5 0 -- 472 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 472 90.5Mitchell 163 >=95% 163 >=95% 0 -- 163 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 163 >=95%Polk 178 >=95% 0 -- 178 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 178 >=95%Rutherford 754 65.4 0 -- 754 65.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 754 65.4Swain 215 86.5 0 -- 215 86.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 215 86.5Transylvania 328 93.6 0 -- 328 93.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 328 93.6Yancey 174 >=95% 0 -- 174 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 174 >=95%Thomas Jefferson** 56 >=95% 0 -- 56 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 56 >=95%

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.

*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Table 20b. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard 1



74

Migrant Not MigrantTargeted AssistanceTotal Served by Title I Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program










Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2


Alexander 378 95.0 0 -- 13 * 22 >=95% 11 90.9 5 80.0 327 >=95% 186 94.6 192 >=95%

Alleghany 131 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 * 3 * 113 93.8 59 93.2 72 >=95%

Ashe 233 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 1 * 7 85.7 4 * 220 >=95% 113 >=95% 120 >=95%

Avery 179 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 1 * 3 * 1 * 173 >=95% 94 >=95% 85 >=95%

Burke 1,122 94.0 3 * 102 >=95% 60 91.7 54 87.0 25 >=95% 878 94.0 544 94.1 578 93.9

Caldwell 974 90.0 1 * 7 85.7 64 82.8 40 72.5 8 75.0 854 91.7 496 91.9 478 88.1

Catawba 1,401 >=95% 2 * 100 >=95% 109 90.8 90 86.7 30 >=95% 1,070 >=95% 665 >=95% 736 93.9

Hickory City 331 76.7 1 * 22 72.7 74 62.2 34 70.6 19 68.4 181 85.1 162 81.5 169 72.2

Newton-Conover City 182 88.5 0 -- 10 * 36 88.9 27 88.9 1 * 108 88.0 87 88.5 95 88.4

Davidson 1,647 91.5 7 85.7 17 88.2 42 76.2 65 84.6 10 90.0 1,506 92.3 856 92.9 791 90.0

Lexington City 168 81.5 1 * 9 88.9 78 84.6 32 65.6 10 90.0 38 84.2 97 83.5 71 78.9

Thomasville City 159 83.6 0 -- 3 * 86 83.7 21 76.2 2 * 47 85.1 82 81.7 77 85.7

Davie 501 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 41 85.4 33 87.9 8 * 418 >=95% 264 >=95% 237 94.1

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,610 91.7 3 * 72 93.1 1,274 86.9 345 84.1 121 94.2 1,795 >=95% 1,810 92.9 1,800 90.6

Iredell-Statesville 1,648 92.0 3 * 46 >=95% 266 86.5 96 79.2 24 91.7 1,213 94.1 821 93.8 827 90.2

Mooresville City 417 92.1 2 * 13 * 60 86.7 19 94.7 12 83.3 311 92.9 210 91.9 207 92.3

Stokes 583 93.1 0 -- 2 * 29 86.2 12 75.0 11 81.8 529 94.3 301 >=95% 282 89.7

Surry 642 94.5 0 -- 0 -- 20 90.0 72 84.7 9 * 541 >=95% 334 94.9 308 94.2

Elkin City 94 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 9 * 11 81.8 0 -- 74 >=95% 44 >=95% 50 >=95%

Mount Airy City 147 >=95% 0 -- 5 * 21 >=95% 6 * 6 * 109 >=95% 67 >=95% 80 >=95%

Watauga 385 88.3 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 8 50.0 6 * 369 88.9 187 89.8 198 86.9

Wilkes 724 >=95% 1 * 3 * 32 >=95% 45 80.0 11 90.9 632 >=95% 348 94.5 376 >=95%

Yadkin 442 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 22 86.4 51 >=95% 6 * 362 >=95% 228 >=95% 214 >=95%

Grandfather Academy** 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 1 * 3 *

Crossnore Academy** 8 62.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8 62.5 3 * 5 80.0

Quality Education** 13 84.6 0 -- 0 -- 13 84.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 7 71.4C.G. Woodson** 15 60.0 0 -- 0 -- 11 72.7 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 9 55.6 6 66.7


*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

MaleBlack Hispanic Multi-Racial White



General TestNorthwest Region

Total American Indian Asian Female

75


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Northwest Region 16,138 92.3 31 51.6 16,107 92.4 27 48.1 0 -- 4 * 16,134 92.3

Alexander 378 >=95% 0 -- 378 95.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 378 95.0

Alleghany 131 94.7 0 -- 131 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 131 94.7

Ashe 233 >=95% 0 -- 233 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 233 >=95%

Avery 179 >=95% 0 -- 179 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 179 >=95%

Burke 1,122 94.0 0 -- 1,122 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,122 94.0

Caldwell 974 90.0 9 55.6 965 90.4 9 55.6 0 -- 0 -- 974 90.0

Catawba 1,401 >=95% 0 -- 1,401 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,401 >=95%

Hickory City 331 76.7 13 38.5 318 78.3 13 38.5 0 -- 0 -- 331 76.7


Davidson 1,647 91.5 0 -- 1,647 91.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,647 91.5

Lexington City 168 81.5 0 -- 168 81.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 168 81.576 Thomasville City 159 83.6 0 -- 159 83.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 159 83.6

Davie 501 >=95% 0 -- 501 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 501 >=95%

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,610 91.7 0 -- 3,610 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3,610 91.7

Iredell-Statesville 1,648 92.0 5 60.0 1,643 92.1 5 60.0 0 -- 0 -- 1,648 92.0


Stokes 583 93.1 0 -- 583 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 583 93.1

Surry 642 94.5 4 * 638 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 638 94.7

Elkin City 94 >=95% 0 -- 94 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 94 >=95%

Mount Airy City 147 >=95% 0 -- 147 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 147 >=95%

Watauga 385 88.3 0 -- 385 88.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 385 88.3

Wilkes 724 >=95% 0 -- 724 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 724 >=95%

Yadkin 442 >=95% 0 -- 442 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 442 >=95%

Grandfather Academy** 4 * 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 *


Quality Education** 13 84.6 0 -- 13 84.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 84.6C.G. Woodson** 15 60.0 0 -- 15 60.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 60.0





Migrant

Northwest Region

Not Migrant


General Test











Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2


Anson 283 70.7 3 * 6 * 177 63.3 2 * 2 * 93 84.9 134 75.4 149 66.4

Cabarrus 1,956 94.6 12 * 31 >=95% 342 87.4 140 90.7 46 93.5 1,385 >=95% 956 95.0 1,000 94.3

Kannapolis City 258 93.4 0 -- 6 83.3 91 89.0 35 >=95% 9 * 117 94.9 144 93.8 114 93.0

Cleveland 1,215 90.6 0 -- 10 * 336 83.9 24 87.5 23 >=95% 822 93.2 598 92.1 617 89.1

Gaston 2,498 90.9 7 * 27 >=95% 558 84.1 138 76.8 24 91.7 1,744 94.0 1,217 91.9 1,281 89.9

Hoke 398 93.2 51 92.2 2 * 177 91.5 38 94.7 13 * 117 94.9 203 >=95% 195 90.3

Lincoln 963 93.9 4 * 7 * 62 88.7 82 86.6 21 >=95% 787 94.9 479 >=95% 484 91.9

Charlotte/Mecklenburg 8,560 85.3 44 77.3 409 87.3 3,558 80.5 917 74.5 137 87.6 3,495 92.9 4,308 86.4 4,252 84.2

Montgomery 311 86.8 0 -- 9 * 74 83.8 49 81.6 7 85.7 172 89.0 148 89.2 163 84.7

Moore 933 94.2 7 85.7 7 85.7 187 87.7 44 93.2 21 >=95% 667 >=95% 467 >=95% 466 93.3

Richmond 603 89.7 35 91.4 8 75.0 276 83.7 27 >=95% 7 * 250 >=95% 306 91.5 297 87.9

Rowan-Salisbury 1,446 92.0 4 * 18 88.9 280 82.5 71 81.7 22 90.9 1,051 >=95% 716 93.7 730 90.3

Scotland 472 86.7 59 81.4 7 * 239 83.3 3 * 5 * 159 93.1 261 87.0 211 86.3

Stanly 726 >=95% 2 * 32 >=95% 120 92.5 23 >=95% 16 * 533 >=95% 323 >=95% 403 >=95%

Union 2,449 84.7 10 80.0 30 93.3 414 72.9 192 72.9 49 73.5 1,754 88.9 1,242 86.5 1,207 82.9

Piedmont Community** 32 93.8 0 -- 1 * 5 80.0 1 * 1 * 24 >=95% 11 81.8 21 >=95%

Piedmont Community** 21 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 -- 19 * 6 * 15 *

Lincoln Charter** 56 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 -- 54 >=95% 28 >=95% 28 92.9

Kennedy Charter** 31 54.8 0 -- 0 -- 29 55.2 0 -- 1 * 1 * 12 83.3 19 36.8

Crossroads Charter** 76 53.9 0 -- 1 * 70 54.3 2 * 2 * 1 * 39 53.8 37 54.1

Crossroads Charter** 32 84.4 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 1 * 27 85.2 15 93.3 17 76.5

Laurinburg Homework** 21 66.7 5 60.0 0 -- 15 66.7 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 12 66.7 9 66.7

Gray Stone Day** 63 93.7 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1 * 0 -- 60 >=95% 33 90.9 30 >=95%Union Academy** 50 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 2 * 0 -- 45 >=95% 31 >=95% 19 *



Black Hispanic Multi-Racial


WhiteTotal American Indian Asian


General Test

Female

Southwest Region

Male

77


Member-shipPercent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship


Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Southwest Region 23,453 88.5 9 55.6 23,444 88.5 1 * 0 -- 8 62.5 23,445 88.5Anson 283 70.7 0 -- 283 70.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 283 70.7Cabarrus 1,956 94.6 0 -- 1,956 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,956 94.6Kannapolis City 258 93.4 0 -- 258 93.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 258 93.4Cleveland 1,215 90.6 0 -- 1,215 90.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,215 90.6Gaston 2,498 90.9 0 -- 2,498 90.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,498 90.9Hoke 398 93.2 2 * 396 93.2 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 396 93.278 Lincoln 963 93.9 0 -- 963 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 963 93.9Charlotte/Mecklenburg 8,560 85.3 0 -- 8,560 85.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8,560 85.3Montgomery 311 86.8 0 -- 311 86.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 311 86.8Moore 933 94.2 0 -- 933 94.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 933 94.2Richmond 603 89.7 0 -- 603 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 603 89.7Rowan-Salisbury 1,446 92.0 6 50.0 1,440 92.2 0 -- 0 -- 6 50.0 1,440 92.2Scotland 472 86.7 1 * 471 86.8 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 472 86.7Stanly 726 >=95% 0 -- 726 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 726 >=95%Union 2,449 84.7 0 -- 2,449 84.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,449 84.7Carolina International** 32 93.8 0 -- 32 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 32 93.8Piedmont Community** 21 >=95% 0 -- 21 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 21 >=95%Lincoln Charter** 56 94.6 0 -- 56 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 56 94.6Kennedy Charter** 31 54.8 0 -- 31 54.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 31 54.8Crossroads Charter** 76 53.9 0 -- 76 53.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 53.9Queen's Grant** 32 84.4 0 -- 32 84.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 32 84.4Laurinburg Homework** 21 66.7 0 -- 21 66.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 21 66.7Gray Stone Day** 63 93.7 0 -- 63 93.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 63 93.7Union Academy** 50 >=95% 0 -- 50 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 50 >=95%





Migrant

Southwest Region

Not Migrant


General Test



Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2


Beaufort 535 88.8 0 -- 1 * 192 81.3 29 65.5 5 * 308 >=95% 276 90.9 259 86.5

Bertie 202 74.8 0 -- 0 -- 170 74.1 1 * 2 * 29 79.3 108 75.9 94 73.4

Camden 139 >=95% 0 -- 4 * 28 92.9 3 * 1 * 103 >=95% 61 93.4 78 >=95%

Edenton/Chowan 198 92.9 1 * 0 -- 82 86.6 0 -- 0 -- 115 >=95% 108 >=95% 90 87.8

Currituck 306 86.6 1 * 3 * 25 72.0 9 * 8 87.5 260 87.7 143 88.1 163 85.3

Dare 374 93.9 1 * 2 * 8 87.5 13 69.2 11 81.8 339 >=95% 161 >=95% 213 93.0

Edgecombe 549 83.4 0 -- 1 * 330 78.5 17 88.2 4 * 197 90.9 278 84.5 271 82.3

Gates 156 93.6 0 -- 1 * 68 >=95% 3 * 1 * 83 94.0 84 91.7 72 >=95%

Halifax 349 87.1 20 85.0 0 -- 316 87.7 4 * 0 -- 9 77.8 160 91.9 189 83.1

Roanoke Rapids City 216 91.7 0 -- 1 * 36 83.3 6 * 4 * 169 93.5 109 94.5 107 88.8

Weldon City 68 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 66 89.4 1 * 1 * 0 -- 36 >=95% 32 81.3

Hertford 241 73.9 1 * 1 * 214 71.0 0 -- 1 * 24 >=95% 131 79.4 110 67.3

Hyde 50 82.0 0 -- 1 * 26 80.8 1 * 1 * 21 81.0 28 78.6 22 86.4

Martin 263 79.5 0 -- 1 * 107 62.6 7 71.4 0 -- 148 91.9 144 84.0 119 73.9

Northampton 184 82.6 0 -- 1 * 151 81.5 0 -- 1 * 31 90.3 92 83.7 92 81.5

Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 458 83.8 0 -- 2 * 209 80.4 12 75.0 12 83.3 223 87.4 211 88.6 247 79.8

Perquimans 131 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 58 94.8 1 * 0 -- 71 >=95% 70 >=95% 61 >=95%

Pitt 1,596 85.5 3 * 26 69.2 729 78.7 79 88.6 34 85.3 725 92.4 856 87.5 740 83.1

Tyrrell 49 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 19 94.7 4 * 1 * 25 >=95% 25 >=95% 24 >=95%

Washington 181 79.0 0 -- 0 -- 145 76.6 3 * 3 * 30 86.7 87 80.5 94 77.7Gaston College Prep** 76 85.5 0 -- 0 -- 67 85.1 1 * 2 * 6 83.3 44 86.4 32 84.4




Northeast Region




General Test

Female Male

79


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Northeast Region 6,321 86.0 265 78.9 6,056 86.3 263 79.5 0 -- 2 * 6,319 86.0Beaufort 535 88.8 0 -- 535 88.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 535 88.8Bertie 202 74.8 0 -- 202 74.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 202 74.8Camden 139 >=95% 0 -- 139 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 139 >=95%Edenton/Chowan 198 92.9 0 -- 198 92.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 198 92.9Currituck 306 86.6 0 -- 306 86.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 306 86.6Dare 374 93.9 0 -- 374 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 374 93.9Edgecombe 549 83.4 0 -- 549 83.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 549 83.4Gates 156 93.6 0 -- 156 93.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 156 93.6Halifax 349 87.1 0 -- 349 87.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 349 87.1Roanoke Rapids City 216 91.7 0 -- 216 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 216 91.7Weldon City 68 89.7 0 -- 68 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 68 89.7Hertford 241 73.9 0 -- 241 73.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 241 73.9Hyde 50 82.0 0 -- 50 82.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 50 82.0Martin 263 79.5 263 79.5 0 -- 263 79.5 0 -- 0 -- 263 79.5Northampton 184 82.6 0 -- 184 82.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 184 82.6Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 458 83.8 0 -- 458 83.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 458 83.8Perquimans 131 >=95% 0 -- 131 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 131 >=95%Pitt 1,596 85.5 2 * 1,594 85.6 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,594 85.6Tyrrell 49 >=95% 0 -- 49 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 49 >=95%Washington 181 79.0 0 -- 181 79.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 181 79.0Gaston College Prep** 76 85.5 0 -- 76 85.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 85.5



80


for the Class of 2010, at the End of Grade 10, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant Students Northeast Region

General Test


Program


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2

Southeast Region 17,455 89.8 849 85.4 216 90.7 6,131 85.6 1,080 84.3 489 91.4 8,690 93.7 8,733 91.6 8,722 88.0

Bladen 380 70.3 6 66.7 0 -- 192 64.6 14 85.7 1 * 167 76.0 180 80.6 200 61.0

Brunswick 771 >=95% 5 * 2 * 165 90.9 39 89.7 21 >=95% 539 >=95% 389 >=95% 382 94.0

Carteret 692 >=95% 5 * 11 72.7 39 >=95% 18 72.2 16 87.5 603 >=95% 327 >=95% 365 94.8

Columbus 490 80.6 31 >=95% 1 * 177 68.9 9 * 4 * 268 85.8 258 81.8 232 79.3

Whiteville City 205 75.1 0 -- 2 * 94 62.8 3 * 5 60.0 101 87.1 113 78.8 92 70.7

Craven 978 >=95% 3 * 14 92.9 333 90.7 31 >=95% 19 * 578 >=95% 506 >=95% 472 94.1

Cumberland 4,082 92.4 57 94.7 85 91.8 2,033 90.9 278 86.0 139 93.5 1,490 >=95% 2,039 93.2 2,043 91.6

Duplin 596 94.0 1 * 1 * 197 90.9 92 91.3 9 * 296 >=95% 309 94.5 287 93.4

Greene 231 74.0 0 -- 0 -- 124 74.2 26 53.8 2 * 79 81.0 107 84.1 124 65.3

Jones 106 81.1 0 -- 1 * 54 79.6 3 * 1 * 47 83.0 49 85.7 57 77.2

Lenoir 796 81.0 3 * 6 66.7 397 75.6 47 76.6 11 63.6 332 89.5 367 85.3 429 77.4

New Hanover 1,884 92.7 6 * 29 89.7 453 91.2 84 76.2 63 88.9 1,249 94.6 938 94.2 946 91.1

Onslow 1,692 91.5 17 94.1 26 >=95% 408 85.8 104 89.4 117 91.5 1,020 93.8 854 92.9 838 90.2

Pamlico 149 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 36 91.7 2 * 3 * 107 >=95% 72 >=95% 77 93.5

Pender 637 89.2 0 -- 1 * 144 84.0 42 81.0 7 85.7 443 91.6 322 91.0 315 87.3

Robeson 1,565 83.4 697 83.5 7 71.4 466 79.4 66 74.2 14 92.9 315 90.8 798 86.0 767 80.7

Sampson 584 92.5 8 * 4 * 182 88.5 94 90.4 14 * 282 >=95% 301 93.4 283 91.5

Clinton City 191 >=95% 8 * 2 * 88 >=95% 25 84.0 3 * 65 >=95% 97 >=95% 94 94.7

Wayne 1,383 88.9 2 * 23 91.3 541 84.7 103 82.5 36 >=95% 678 92.8 689 90.9 694 87.0

Cape Lookout Marine** 43 69.8 0 -- 0 -- 8 50.0 0 -- 4 * 31 74.2 18 61.1 25 76.0Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.






General Test

Female

Southeast Region

Male

81








Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Southeast Region 17,455 89.8 2,171 82.5 15,284 90.8 2,162 82.6 0 -- 12 75.0 17,443 89.8Bladen 380 70.3 1 * 379 70.4 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 379 70.4Brunswick 771 >=95% 1 * 770 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 770 >=95%Carteret 692 >=95% 0 -- 692 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 692 >=95%Columbus 490 80.6 490 80.6 0 -- 490 80.6 0 -- 2 * 488 80.5Whiteville City 205 75.1 10 50.0 195 76.4 7 42.9 0 -- 3 * 202 75.2Craven 978 >=95% 0 -- 978 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 978 >=95%Cumberland 4,082 92.4 131 91.6 3,951 92.5 131 91.6 0 -- 0 -- 4,082 92.4Duplin 596 94.0 2 * 594 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 594 93.9Greene 231 74.0 0 -- 231 74.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 231 74.0Jones 106 81.1 0 -- 106 81.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 106 81.1Lenoir 796 81.0 11 36.4 785 81.7 11 36.4 0 -- 0 -- 796 81.0New Hanover 1,884 92.7 0 -- 1,884 92.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,884 92.7Onslow 1,692 91.5 0 -- 1,692 91.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,692 91.5Pamlico 149 >=95% 0 -- 149 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 149 >=95%Pender 637 89.2 0 -- 637 89.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 637 89.2Robeson 1,565 83.4 1,523 83.0 42 >=95% 1,523 83.0 0 -- 1 * 1,564 83.4Sampson 584 92.5 2 * 582 92.4 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 582 92.4Clinton City 191 >=95% 0 -- 191 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 191 >=95%Wayne 1,383 88.9 0 -- 1,383 88.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,383 88.9Cape Lookout Marine** 43 69.8 0 -- 43 69.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 69.8


82


for the Class of 2010, at the End of Grade 10, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant Students Southeast Region

General Test


Program


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 1,396 85.4 2,404 89.8 29,660 81.4 7,080 80.4 2,376 89.4 60,430 93.2 51,695 90.1 51,651 87.2Central Region 32,736 86.7 134 87.3 1,033 87.9 10,648 78.4 2,547 78.0 910 87.8 17,464 92.9 16,358 88.2 16,378 85.2

Alamance-Burlington 1,593 84.9 9 66.7 27 92.6 438 78.1 167 70.1 48 85.4 904 90.9 745 88.3 848 82.0Caswell 245 75.9 0 -- 2 * 103 74.8 6 50.0 2 * 132 78.0 104 82.7 141 70.9Chatham 560 89.3 3 * 3 * 106 84.0 109 81.7 16 87.5 323 93.5 259 91.1 301 87.7Durham 2,388 68.3 6 66.7 53 84.9 1,400 60.6 198 52.0 65 81.5 666 86.6 1,217 70.1 1,171 66.4Franklin 573 >=95% 1 * 5 * 185 94.6 40 87.5 6 * 336 >=95% 272 >=95% 301 >=95%Granville 622 >=95% 1 * 7 * 239 93.7 22 >=95% 9 * 344 >=95% 328 >=95% 294 94.9Guilford 5,237 77.2 23 78.3 277 76.9 2,094 70.7 309 67.3 168 79.8 2,366 84.1 2,595 78.8 2,642 75.7Harnett 1,289 88.6 14 92.9 3 * 375 81.6 122 82.8 61 88.5 714 93.1 627 89.5 662 87.8Johnston 2,070 93.9 7 * 5 * 424 87.3 234 87.2 60 91.7 1,340 >=95% 1,011 >=95% 1,059 91.6Lee 667 86.5 2 * 7 71.4 155 80.6 134 76.9 24 87.5 345 93.0 343 88.9 324 84.0Nash-Rocky Mount 1,266 87.4 5 80.0 21 85.7 678 81.3 66 84.8 19 89.5 477 >=95% 673 88.9 593 85.7Orange 523 88.0 2 * 8 62.5 87 81.6 19 73.7 13 * 394 90.1 236 86.4 287 89.2Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 900 92.2 3 * 99 87.9 121 85.1 75 80.0 42 92.9 560 >=95% 451 92.7 449 91.8Person 420 94.0 3 * 1 * 162 91.4 13 92.3 3 * 238 >=95% 214 >=95% 206 91.3Randolph 1,330 >=95% 7 * 10 * 74 91.9 89 88.8 33 93.9 1,117 >=95% 687 >=95% 643 93.0Asheboro City 368 92.4 1 * 10 90.0 56 91.1 91 83.5 12 * 198 >=95% 199 91.0 169 94.1Rockingham 1,036 92.4 4 * 4 * 267 88.4 48 87.5 21 >=95% 692 94.2 503 94.4 533 90.4Vance 595 69.4 1 * 2 * 375 64.8 20 50.0 7 * 190 79.5 318 73.0 277 65.3Wake 9,212 91.9 17 88.2 463 94.0 2,602 86.9 704 84.1 263 89.0 5,163 >=95% 4,669 92.9 4,543 90.9Warren 212 84.9 10 * 1 * 156 82.1 5 80.0 4 * 36 91.7 106 90.6 106 79.2Wilson 892 87.9 2 * 8 87.5 450 83.3 57 75.4 12 91.7 363 >=95% 473 90.5 419 85.0River Mill Academy** 42 78.6 0 -- 0 -- 5 60.0 0 -- 4 * 33 78.8 25 76.0 17 82.4Clover Garden** 14 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 13 * 8 * 6 *New Century Charter** 23 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 2 * 19 94.7 18 94.4 5 *Woods Charter** 39 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 3 * 0 -- 3 * 32 >=95% 16 * 23 >=95%Kestrel Heights** 44 77.3 0 -- 0 -- 25 76.0 9 77.8 5 60.0 5 * 21 71.4 23 82.6Provisions Academy** 8 62.5 0 -- 0 -- 6 66.7 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 6 83.3Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 57 91.2 0 -- 0 -- 25 88.0 1 * 3 * 28 92.9 32 90.6 25 92.0Pace Academy** 15 73.3 1 * 0 -- 4 * 1 * 0 -- 9 77.8 5 * 10 60.0Roxboro Community** 29 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 0 -- 1 * 22 90.9 12 83.3 17 *Franklin Academy** 70 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 3 * 1 * 61 >=95% 47 >=95% 23 >=95%East Wake Academy** 84 73.8 0 -- 0 -- 5 40.0 0 -- 1 * 78 75.6 65 78.5 19 57.9Raleigh Charter HS** 268 94.4 1 * 16 * 9 77.8 2 * 2 * 238 95.0 63 90.5 205 >=95%Community Partners High** 33 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 5 80.0 1 * 0 -- 27 >=95% 10 * 23 91.3Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 12 83.3 11 81.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 4 * 8 87.5


FemaleWhite Male



American Indian Asian Black Hispanic

Central RegionGeneral Test

Multi-RacialTotal

83








Percent Passing

State 103,346 88.7 3,231 82.9 100,115 88.9 3,175 83.2 0 -- 59 67.8 103,287 88.7Central Region 32,736 86.7 273 74.7 32,463 86.8 245 75.9 0 -- 28 64.3 32,708 86.7Alamance-Burlington 1,593 84.9 1 * 1,592 85.0 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,592 85.0Caswell 245 75.9 245 75.9 0 -- 245 75.9 0 -- 0 -- 245 75.9Chatham 560 89.3 4 * 556 89.6 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 556 89.6Durham 2,388 68.3 0 -- 2,388 68.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,388 68.3Franklin 573 >=95% 0 -- 573 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 573 >=95%Granville 622 >=95% 0 -- 622 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 622 >=95%Guilford 5,237 77.2 0 -- 5,237 77.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5,237 77.2Harnett 1,289 88.6 0 -- 1,289 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,289 88.6Johnston 2,070 93.9 7 * 2,063 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 7 * 2,063 93.8Lee 667 86.5 4 * 663 86.6 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 663 86.6Nash-Rocky Mount 1,266 87.4 1 * 1,265 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,265 87.4Orange 523 88.0 0 -- 523 88.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 523 88.0Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 900 92.2 0 -- 900 92.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 900 92.2Person 420 94.0 0 -- 420 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 420 94.0Randolph 1,330 >=95% 6 83.3 1,324 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 6 83.3 1,324 >=95%Asheboro City 368 92.4 0 -- 368 92.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 368 92.4Rockingham 1,036 92.4 3 * 1,033 92.5 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,033 92.5Vance 595 69.4 2 * 593 69.6 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 593 69.6Wake 9,212 91.9 0 -- 9,212 91.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 9,212 91.9Warren 212 84.9 0 -- 212 84.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 212 84.9Wilson 892 87.9 0 -- 892 87.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 892 87.9River Mill Academy** 42 78.6 0 -- 42 78.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 42 78.6Clover Garden** 14 * 0 -- 14 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 *New Century Charter** 23 >=95% 0 -- 23 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 23 >=95%Woods Charter** 39 >=95% 0 -- 39 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 39 >=95%Kestrel Heights** 44 77.3 0 -- 44 77.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 44 77.3Provisions Academy** 8 62.5 0 -- 8 62.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8 62.5Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 57 91.2 0 -- 57 91.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 57 91.2Pace Academy** 15 73.3 0 -- 15 73.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 15 73.3Roxboro Community** 29 93.1 0 -- 29 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 29 93.1Franklin Academy** 70 >=95% 0 -- 70 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 70 >=95%East Wake Academy** 84 73.8 0 -- 84 73.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 84 73.8Raleigh Charter HS** 268 94.4 0 -- 268 94.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 268 94.4Community Partners High** 33 93.9 0 -- 33 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 33 93.9Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 12 83.3 0 -- 12 83.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 12 83.3Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Program

84



General TestCentral Region











Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0

Western Region 6,755 93.9 73 >=95% 69 73.9 404 86.6 305 85.6 114 89.5 5,790 >=95% 3,329 >=95% 3,426 92.5

Buncombe 1,785 >=95% 9 * 16 81.3 104 93.3 80 92.5 40 >=95% 1,536 >=95% 897 >=95% 888 >=95%

Asheville City 303 93.1 1 * 6 83.3 99 86.9 14 92.9 13 92.3 170 >=95% 159 >=95% 144 89.6

Cherokee County 264 93.9 6 * 1 * 4 * 3 * 3 * 247 94.3 129 >=95% 135 90.4

Clay 99 >=95% 1 * 2 * 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 95 >=95% 57 >=95% 42 92.9

Graham 66 >=95% 6 * 1 * 0 -- 1 * 1 * 57 94.7 39 >=95% 27 88.9

Haywood 498 >=95% 3 * 2 * 2 * 15 93.3 6 * 470 >=95% 234 >=95% 264 >=95%

Henderson 891 90.6 5 80.0 12 83.3 35 74.3 89 83.1 17 76.5 733 92.8 431 92.6 460 88.7

Jackson 248 92.3 23 >=95% 6 16.7 5 * 3 * 1 * 210 93.8 111 93.7 137 91.2

Macon 303 93.1 0 -- 4 * 2 * 14 64.3 2 * 281 >=95% 147 94.6 156 91.7

Madison 182 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 1 * 176 >=95% 93 >=95% 89 94.4

McDowell 439 95.0 1 * 12 75.0 12 * 21 85.7 4 * 389 >=95% 207 >=95% 232 93.1

Mitchell 145 91.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 66.7 0 -- 139 92.1 72 91.7 73 90.4

Polk 171 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 13 * 7 * 6 * 145 >=95% 85 >=95% 86 94.2

Rutherford 724 85.1 0 -- 3 * 110 79.1 26 69.2 12 66.7 573 87.3 365 88.5 359 81.6

Swain 117 94.9 16 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 97 94.8 57 >=95% 60 91.7

Transylvania 279 >=95% 2 * 3 * 14 92.9 6 83.3 4 * 250 >=95% 130 >=95% 149 94.6

Yancey 204 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 2 * 11 90.9 2 * 188 >=95% 94 >=95% 110 >=95%

Thomas Jefferson** 37 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 0 -- 1 * 34 >=95% 22 >=95% 15 *


Total Female MaleMulti-Racial WhiteAmerican Indian Asian Black Hispanic

General Test


for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Ethnicity, and GenderWestern Region

85


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Western Region 6,755 93.9 432 93.1 6,323 94.0 429 93.2 0 -- 3 * 6,752 94.0

Buncombe 1,785 >=95% 0 -- 1,785 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,785 >=95%Asheville City 303 93.1 0 -- 303 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 303 93.1Cherokee County 264 93.9 264 93.9 0 -- 264 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 264 93.9Clay 99 >=95% 0 -- 99 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 99 >=95%Graham 66 >=95% 0 -- 66 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 66 >=95%86 Haywood 498 >=95% 1 * 497 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 497 >=95%Henderson 891 90.6 2 * 889 90.7 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 889 90.7Jackson 248 92.3 0 -- 248 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 248 92.3Macon 303 93.1 20 >=95% 283 92.6 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 303 93.1Madison 182 >=95% 0 -- 182 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 182 >=95%McDowell 439 95.0 0 -- 439 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 439 95.0Mitchell 145 91.0 145 91.0 0 -- 145 91.0 0 -- 0 -- 145 91.0Polk 171 >=95% 0 -- 171 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 171 >=95%Rutherford 724 85.1 0 -- 724 85.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 724 85.1Swain 117 94.9 0 -- 117 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 117 94.9Transylvania 279 >=95% 0 -- 279 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 279 >=95%Yancey 204 >=95% 0 -- 204 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 204 >=95%Thomas Jefferson** 37 >=95% 0 -- 37 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 37 >=95%


*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Western Region


for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant Students

General Test

Migrant Not MigrantTargeted

AssistanceTotal Served by Title INot Served by

Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program


Member-shipPercent Passing Member-ship








Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0

Northwest Region 14,897 >=95% 39 92.3 415 92.5 2,236 93.6 875 90.2 277 92.1 11,055 >=95% 7,419 >=95% 7,478 94.6

Alexander 366 >=95% 1 * 14 * 20 >=95% 14 92.9 3 * 314 >=95% 186 >=95% 180 >=95%

Alleghany 105 92.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10 * 3 * 92 91.3 51 >=95% 54 88.9

Ashe 234 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 2 * 8 87.5 1 * 222 >=95% 108 >=95% 126 >=95%

Avery 143 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 4 * 3 * 135 >=95% 81 >=95% 62 >=95%

Burke 1,055 92.7 1 * 97 94.8 86 93.0 38 81.6 26 80.8 807 93.3 559 94.1 496 91.1

Caldwell 873 >=95% 1 * 6 * 55 92.7 32 93.8 15 93.3 764 >=95% 427 >=95% 446 >=95%

Catawba 1,269 >=95% 4 * 110 >=95% 87 92.0 74 >=95% 21 90.5 973 >=95% 617 >=95% 652 >=95%

Hickory City 300 90.0 0 -- 19 89.5 65 86.2 28 78.6 13 84.6 175 93.7 172 91.3 128 88.3

Newton-Conover City 185 89.2 1 * 18 72.2 31 93.5 18 77.8 7 71.4 110 93.6 93 92.5 92 85.9

Davidson 1,398 >=95% 7 * 15 86.7 42 90.5 47 >=95% 15 86.7 1,272 >=95% 697 >=95% 701 >=95%

Lexington City 168 88.7 0 -- 17 88.2 70 >=95% 24 79.2 6 83.3 51 80.4 87 >=95% 81 81.5

Thomasville City 172 90.1 0 -- 4 * 108 88.0 19 89.5 5 80.0 36 >=95% 66 >=95% 106 86.8

Davie 435 94.3 3 * 2 * 33 >=95% 26 69.2 3 * 368 >=95% 240 >=95% 195 93.3

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,535 >=95% 8 87.5 56 91.1 1,233 93.9 258 91.9 97 94.8 1,883 >=95% 1,763 >=95% 1,772 >=95%

Iredell-Statesville 1,500 >=95% 4 * 37 91.9 234 >=95% 85 84.7 22 >=95% 1,118 >=95% 709 >=95% 791 >=95%

Mooresville City 353 93.5 3 * 6 * 48 89.6 11 90.9 3 * 282 94.0 172 >=95% 181 91.7

Stokes 559 95.0 4 * 0 -- 35 94.3 13 * 15 93.3 492 >=95% 281 >=95% 278 92.8

Surry 599 >=95% 1 * 2 * 20 >=95% 73 87.7 5 * 498 >=95% 291 >=95% 308 >=95%

Elkin City 90 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 8 * 0 -- 78 >=95% 56 >=95% 34 94.1

Mount Airy City 136 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 13 92.3 6 * 2 * 112 >=95% 67 >=95% 69 92.8

Watauga 361 >=95% 0 -- 5 80.0 1 * 4 * 2 * 349 >=95% 168 >=95% 193 93.8

Wilkes 625 >=95% 1 * 1 * 25 >=95% 30 86.7 5 * 563 >=95% 311 >=95% 314 >=95%

Yadkin 422 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 18 * 45 >=95% 5 * 353 >=95% 210 >=95% 212 >=95%

Grandfather Academy** 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 --

Crossnore Academy** 7 85.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7 85.7 4 * 3 *C.G. Woodson** 6 83.3 0 -- 0 -- 6 83.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 4 *Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 and beyond were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal


for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Ethnicity, and Gender

General Test


Northwest Region

Female MaleBlack

87


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Northwest Region 14,897 >=95% 25 52.0 14,872 >=95% 23 52.2 0 -- 2 * 14,895 >=95%

Alexander 366 >=95% 0 -- 366 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 366 >=95%

Alleghany 105 92.4 0 -- 105 92.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 105 92.4

Ashe 234 >=95% 0 -- 234 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 234 >=95%

Avery 143 >=95% 0 -- 143 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 143 >=95%

Burke 1,055 92.7 0 -- 1,055 92.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,055 92.7

Caldwell 873 >=95% 13 76.9 860 >=95% 13 76.9 0 -- 0 -- 873 >=95%

Catawba 1,269 >=95% 0 -- 1,269 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,269 >=95%

Hickory City 300 90.0 7 14.3 293 91.8 7 14.3 0 -- 0 -- 300 90.0


Davidson 1,398 >=95% 0 -- 1,398 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,398 >=95%

Lexington City 168 88.7 0 -- 168 88.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 168 88.7


Davie 435 94.3 0 -- 435 94.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 435 94.3

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,535 >=95% 0 -- 3,535 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3,535 >=95%

Iredell-Statesville 1,500 >=95% 3 * 1,497 >=95% 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 1,500 >=95%


Stokes 559 >=95% 0 -- 559 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 559 >=95%

Surry 599 >=95% 2 * 597 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 597 >=95%

Elkin City 90 >=95% 0 -- 90 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 90 >=95%

Mount Airy City 136 >=95% 0 -- 136 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 136 >=95%

Watauga 361 >=95% 0 -- 361 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 361 >=95%

Wilkes 625 >=95% 0 -- 625 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 625 >=95%

Yadkin 422 >=95% 0 -- 422 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 422 >=95%

Grandfather Academy** 1 * 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 *


C.G. Woodson** 6 83.3 0 -- 6 83.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 83.3Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

88

General Test


Program Targeted Assistance

Northwest Region

Migrant Not Migrant












Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0

Southwest Region 21,030 93.2 171 91.2 592 93.4 6,106 89.8 1,448 85.8 351 94.3 12,362 >=95% 10,728 93.8 10,302 92.5

Anson 280 88.2 0 -- 6 83.3 185 84.9 3 * 0 -- 86 >=95% 142 92.3 138 84.1

Cabarrus 1,671 >=95% 4 * 26 >=95% 273 93.8 100 93.0 47 >=95% 1,221 >=95% 858 >=95% 813 >=95%

Kannapolis City 292 93.5 0 -- 2 * 107 90.7 41 >=95% 9 88.9 133 >=95% 154 >=95% 138 91.3

Cleveland 1,090 91.8 2 * 12 * 311 85.9 22 86.4 20 90.0 723 94.6 580 92.8 510 90.8

Gaston 2,267 >=95% 3 * 31 87.1 446 >=95% 102 88.2 26 >=95% 1,659 >=95% 1,166 >=95% 1,101 94.3

Hoke 371 >=95% 38 >=95% 3 * 184 >=95% 33 87.9 13 * 100 >=95% 197 >=95% 174 >=95%

Lincoln 897 >=95% 1 * 4 * 58 89.7 55 89.1 17 * 762 >=95% 434 >=95% 463 >=95%

Charlotte/Mecklenburg 7,374 92.1 32 81.3 376 93.6 3,022 89.4 715 83.2 95 90.5 3,134 >=95% 3,906 92.8 3,468 91.4

Montgomery 290 91.4 0 -- 12 * 82 89.0 41 >=95% 6 83.3 149 90.6 137 91.2 153 91.5

Moore 830 94.9 5 80.0 15 * 160 92.5 37 91.9 22 >=95% 591 >=95% 400 >=95% 430 94.7

Richmond 510 >=95% 21 >=95% 8 87.5 237 94.1 16 * 4 * 224 >=95% 232 >=95% 278 >=95%

Rowan-Salisbury 1,530 91.8 8 87.5 21 90.5 333 85.9 95 78.9 26 >=95% 1,047 94.7 763 93.4 767 90.1

Scotland 430 89.8 50 92.0 8 * 185 83.8 6 * 5 * 176 94.3 206 89.8 224 89.7

Stanly 677 >=95% 0 -- 31 >=95% 116 >=95% 12 91.7 12 * 506 >=95% 291 >=95% 386 >=95%

Union 2,281 90.3 3 * 36 83.3 336 86.9 166 84.3 47 91.5 1,693 91.7 1,134 89.9 1,147 90.7

Piedmont Community** 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 0 -- 1 * 13 * 14 * 6 *

Lincoln Charter** 41 92.7 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 40 92.5 17 94.1 24 91.7

Kennedy Charter** 29 75.9 0 -- 0 -- 27 74.1 1 * 1 * 0 -- 16 87.5 13 61.5

Crossroads Charter** 30 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 28 82.1 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 15 80.0 15 80.0

Laurinburg Homework** 7 57.1 2 * 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 4 * 3 *

Gray Stone Day** 71 >=95% 2 * 1 * 1 * 1 * 0 -- 66 >=95% 36 >=95% 35 >=95%

Union Academy** 42 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 2 * 0 -- 36 88.9 26 84.6 16 93.8Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

MaleBlack



General TestSouthwest Region

Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal American Indian Asian Female

89


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Southwest Region 21,030 93.2 3 * 21,027 93.2 1 * 0 -- 2 * 21,028 93.2Anson 280 88.2 0 -- 280 88.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 280 88.2Cabarrus 1,671 >=95% 0 -- 1,671 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,671 >=95%Kannapolis City 292 93.5 0 -- 292 93.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 292 93.5Cleveland 1,090 91.8 0 -- 1,090 91.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,090 91.8Gaston 2,267 >=95% 0 -- 2,267 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,267 >=95%Hoke 371 >=95% 2 * 369 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 369 >=95%Lincoln 897 >=95% 0 -- 897 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 897 >=95%Charlotte/Mecklenburg 7,374 92.1 0 -- 7,374 92.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7,374 92.1Montgomery 290 91.4 0 -- 290 91.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 290 91.4Moore 830 94.9 0 -- 830 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 830 94.9Richmond 510 >=95% 0 -- 510 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 510 >=95%Rowan-Salisbury 1,530 91.8 0 -- 1,530 91.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,530 91.8Scotland 430 89.8 1 * 429 90.0 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 430 89.8Stanly 677 >=95% 0 -- 677 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 677 >=95%Union 2,281 90.3 0 -- 2,281 90.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,281 90.3Piedmont Community** 20 >=95% 0 -- 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 20 >=95%Lincoln Charter** 41 92.7 0 -- 41 92.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 41 92.7Kennedy Charter** 29 75.9 0 -- 29 75.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 29 75.9Crossroads Charter** 30 80.0 0 -- 30 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 30 80.0Laurinburg Homework** 7 57.1 0 -- 7 57.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7 57.1Gray Stone Day** 71 >=95% 0 -- 71 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 71 >=95%Union Academy** 42 88.1 0 -- 42 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 42 88.1


Migrant Not Migrant

Table 21f. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard 1

General Test


Program Targeted Assistance

for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsSouthwest Region

90


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0

Northeast Region 5,798 90.5 24 87.5 34 >=95% 2,751 87.4 153 83.0 58 86.2 2,778 94.2 2,952 92.1 2,846 88.9

Beaufort 492 86.4 0 -- 1 * 186 81.7 19 73.7 5 * 281 90.0 251 86.9 241 85.9

Bertie 174 87.9 1 * 0 -- 149 85.9 0 -- 1 * 23 >=95% 85 89.4 89 86.5

Camden 134 >=95% 0 -- 2 * 21 90.5 0 -- 1 * 110 >=95% 58 >=95% 76 >=95%

Edenton/Chowan 190 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 77 93.5 4 * 0 -- 109 >=95% 100 >=95% 90 >=95%

Currituck 290 91.0 1 * 0 -- 23 82.6 3 * 6 * 257 91.4 144 91.7 146 90.4

Dare 364 93.4 0 -- 0 -- 9 * 12 75.0 6 66.7 337 94.4 179 92.7 185 94.1

Edgecombe 507 89.7 0 -- 2 * 315 88.6 16 93.8 1 * 173 91.3 268 93.3 239 85.8

Gates 131 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 55 94.5 0 -- 1 * 74 >=95% 64 >=95% 67 >=95%

Halifax 262 92.0 7 85.7 0 -- 251 92.4 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 158 94.3 104 88.5

Roanoke Rapids City 174 >=95% 3 * 0 -- 29 89.7 2 * 2 * 138 >=95% 87 >=95% 87 93.1

Weldon City 78 93.6 0 -- 1 * 77 93.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 >=95% 35 91.4

Hertford 251 77.7 5 60.0 0 -- 200 76.5 4 * 1 * 41 90.2 137 78.1 114 77.2

Hyde 54 87.0 0 -- 1 * 28 75.0 2 * 0 -- 23 >=95% 29 93.1 25 80.0

Martin 282 87.2 1 * 1 * 147 82.3 8 62.5 4 * 121 >=95% 138 89.1 144 85.4

Northampton 149 88.6 1 * 0 -- 114 86.0 1 * 2 * 31 >=95% 74 89.2 75 88.0

Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 394 90.4 2 * 3 * 176 89.8 10 80.0 8 75.0 195 91.8 208 92.3 186 88.2

Perquimans 113 88.5 0 -- 2 * 41 87.8 4 * 1 * 65 89.2 46 91.3 67 86.6

Pitt 1,520 91.8 2 * 21 >=95% 676 87.3 62 91.9 15 93.3 744 >=95% 764 93.7 756 89.8

Tyrrell 38 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 12 91.7 5 40.0 0 -- 21 90.5 19 84.2 19 84.2

Washington 143 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 113 93.8 1 * 2 * 27 >=95% 68 >=95% 75 93.3

Gaston College Prep** 58 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 52 94.2 0 -- 2 * 4 * 32 93.8 26 92.3Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Northeast Region



General Test


91


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Northeast Region 5,798 90.5 282 87.2 5,516 90.7 282 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 5,798 90.5Beaufort 492 86.4 0 -- 492 86.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 492 86.4Bertie 174 87.9 0 -- 174 87.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 174 87.9Camden 134 >=95% 0 -- 134 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 134 >=95%Edenton/Chowan 190 >=95% 0 -- 190 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 190 >=95%Currituck 290 91.0 0 -- 290 91.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 290 91.0Dare 364 93.4 0 -- 364 93.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 364 93.4Edgecombe 507 89.7 0 -- 507 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 507 89.7Gates 131 >=95% 0 -- 131 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 131 >=95%Halifax 262 92.0 0 -- 262 92.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 262 92.0Roanoke Rapids City 174 >=95% 0 -- 174 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 174 >=95%Weldon City 78 93.6 0 -- 78 93.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 93.6Hertford 251 77.7 0 -- 251 77.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 251 77.7Hyde 54 87.0 0 -- 54 87.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 54 87.0Martin 282 87.2 282 87.2 0 -- 282 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 282 87.2Northampton 149 88.6 0 -- 149 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 149 88.6Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 394 90.4 0 -- 394 90.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 394 90.4Perquimans 113 88.5 0 -- 113 88.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 113 88.5Pitt 1,520 91.8 0 -- 1,520 91.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,520 91.8Tyrrell 38 84.2 0 -- 38 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 38 84.2Washington 143 >=95% 0 -- 143 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 143 >=95%Gaston College Prep** 58 93.1 0 -- 58 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 58 93.1


General TestNortheast Region



92


Program


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0

Southeast Region 15,466 94.6 751 92.8 178 88.8 5,403 93.1 804 92.8 412 >=95% 7,918 >=95% 7,803 >=95% 7,663 93.6

Bladen 382 90.8 2 * 0 -- 194 89.2 17 76.5 2 * 167 94.6 182 91.8 200 90.0

Brunswick 745 >=95% 8 75.0 4 * 173 >=95% 29 89.7 18 * 513 >=95% 358 >=95% 387 >=95%

Carteret 633 91.5 2 * 7 71.4 40 87.5 9 77.8 18 77.8 557 92.6 303 92.1 330 90.9

Columbus 484 88.0 27 88.9 0 -- 212 83.5 10 90.0 1 * 234 91.9 211 90.0 273 86.4

Whiteville City 176 90.3 2 * 2 * 80 83.8 5 80.0 1 * 86 >=95% 86 93.0 90 87.8

Craven 843 >=95% 1 * 19 89.5 258 >=95% 23 >=95% 22 >=95% 520 >=95% 451 >=95% 392 >=95%

Cumberland 3,577 >=95% 59 >=95% 69 91.3 1,719 >=95% 243 93.0 126 >=95% 1,361 >=95% 1,783 >=95% 1,794 >=95%

Duplin 533 >=95% 1 * 1 * 194 >=95% 73 >=95% 3 * 261 >=95% 285 >=95% 248 >=95%

Greene 223 89.7 0 -- 1 * 110 88.2 17 82.4 2 * 93 92.5 108 89.8 115 89.6

Jones 93 83.9 0 -- 0 -- 64 85.9 2 * 3 * 24 83.3 38 84.2 55 83.6

Lenoir 660 91.1 1 * 6 * 315 87.3 19 84.2 4 * 315 94.9 337 92.3 323 89.8

New Hanover 1,564 >=95% 3 * 15 93.3 316 93.0 49 >=95% 36 94.4 1,145 >=95% 832 >=95% 732 >=95%

Onslow 1,492 >=95% 13 * 20 85.0 370 91.6 76 >=95% 103 >=95% 910 >=95% 754 >=95% 738 93.8

Pamlico 146 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 38 >=95% 5 80.0 2 * 100 >=95% 71 >=95% 75 >=95%

Pender 531 >=95% 0 -- 2 * 112 >=95% 15 93.3 12 * 390 >=95% 243 >=95% 288 >=95%

Robeson 1,446 91.4 615 92.2 10 * 452 88.7 45 80.0 13 92.3 311 >=95% 759 93.0 687 89.7

Sampson 474 >=95% 9 * 1 * 153 >=95% 69 94.2 9 * 233 >=95% 238 >=95% 236 94.1

Clinton City 203 >=95% 6 * 2 * 99 >=95% 13 * 7 * 76 >=95% 112 >=95% 91 >=95%

Wayne 1,235 94.3 2 * 18 77.8 500 93.2 84 >=95% 30 >=95% 601 >=95% 643 >=95% 592 92.2

Cape Lookout Marine** 26 46.2 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 1 * 0 -- 21 42.9 9 55.6 17 41.2Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Southeast Region



General Test


93








Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Southeast Region 15,466 94.6 2,011 90.1 13,455 >=95% 2,003 90.2 0 -- 10 60.0 15,456 94.6Bladen 382 90.8 0 -- 382 90.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 382 90.8Brunswick 745 >=95% 2 * 743 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 743 >=95%Carteret 633 91.5 0 -- 633 91.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 633 91.5Columbus 484 88.0 484 88.0 0 -- 484 88.0 0 -- 1 * 483 88.0Whiteville City 176 90.3 8 75.0 168 91.1 4 * 0 -- 4 * 172 90.7Craven 843 >=95% 0 -- 843 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 843 >=95%Cumberland 3,577 >=95% 86 88.4 3,491 >=95% 86 88.4 0 -- 0 -- 3,577 >=95%Duplin 533 >=95% 0 -- 533 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 533 >=95%Greene 223 89.7 0 -- 223 89.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 223 89.7Jones 93 83.9 0 -- 93 83.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 93 83.9Lenoir 660 91.1 5 * 655 91.8 5 * 0 -- 0 -- 660 91.1New Hanover 1,564 >=95% 0 -- 1,564 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,564 >=95%94 Onslow 1,492 >=95% 0 -- 1,492 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,492 >=95%Pamlico 146 >=95% 0 -- 146 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 146 >=95%Pender 531 >=95% 0 -- 531 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 531 >=95%Robeson 1,446 91.4 1,424 91.4 22 >=95% 1,424 91.4 0 -- 1 * 1,445 91.5Sampson 474 >=95% 2 * 472 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 472 >=95%Clinton City 203 >=95% 0 -- 203 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 203 >=95%Wayne 1,235 94.3 0 -- 1,235 94.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,235 94.3Cape Lookout Marine** 26 46.2 0 -- 26 46.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 26 46.2


General Test


for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsSoutheast Region


Program


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 1,190 92.8 2,194 90.7 26,391 89.3 5,625 87.0 1,971 92.6 56,778 >=95% 47,524 94.1 46,625 92.0Central Region 30,203 91.2 132 93.2 906 89.6 9,491 86.4 2,040 84.7 759 91.7 16,875 94.7 15,293 92.3 14,910 90.1

Alamance-Burlington 1,612 86.3 5 80.0 19 78.9 389 78.1 136 81.6 25 92.0 1,038 90.0 798 90.1 814 82.6

Caswell 220 90.5 1 * 1 * 99 91.9 5 60.0 8 87.5 106 90.6 101 91.1 119 89.9

Chatham 523 89.9 0 -- 3 * 110 87.3 69 85.5 7 * 334 91.9 270 90.0 253 89.7

Durham 2,044 79.8 3 * 43 79.1 1,084 73.6 149 65.8 63 85.7 702 91.9 1,024 81.0 1,020 78.7

Franklin 529 >=95% 1 * 4 * 186 >=95% 44 >=95% 7 * 287 >=95% 265 >=95% 264 >=95%

Granville 566 >=95% 1 * 4 * 213 >=95% 34 94.1 10 * 304 >=95% 303 >=95% 263 >=95%

Guilford 5,097 87.2 21 >=95% 236 85.2 2,073 82.0 293 74.1 167 88.0 2,307 93.5 2,624 88.8 2,473 85.4

Harnett 1,271 87.3 13 76.9 10 * 356 83.7 106 80.2 47 89.4 739 90.0 659 88.0 612 86.6

Johnston 1,838 >=95% 3 * 15 93.3 360 92.8 183 92.3 33 93.9 1,244 >=95% 909 >=95% 929 94.2

Lee 633 87.7 3 * 6 * 153 87.6 120 76.7 16 87.5 335 91.3 305 88.2 328 87.2

Nash-Rocky Mount 1,221 93.4 4 * 10 90.0 615 90.4 62 >=95% 15 * 515 >=95% 604 >=95% 617 91.2

Orange 520 93.5 2 * 5 * 105 94.3 24 79.2 12 * 372 93.8 254 >=95% 266 91.7

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 862 >=95% 1 * 68 >=95% 124 93.5 47 93.6 35 88.6 587 >=95% 402 >=95% 460 93.9

Person 380 94.7 1 * 2 * 132 94.7 9 88.9 7 * 229 >=95% 213 >=95% 167 92.8

Randolph 1,176 94.7 5 80.0 25 80.0 68 91.2 76 94.7 21 >=95% 981 >=95% 569 >=95% 607 93.9

Asheboro City 258 >=95% 0 -- 4 * 39 >=95% 57 >=95% 4 * 154 >=95% 136 >=95% 122 >=95%

Rockingham 1,020 >=95% 6 * 3 * 260 92.7 39 89.7 17 * 695 >=95% 474 >=95% 546 94.1

Vance 578 79.1 0 -- 4 * 382 79.1 31 48.4 4 * 157 85.4 306 80.7 272 77.2

Wake 8,399 94.8 32 87.5 426 93.0 2,100 92.2 506 91.1 237 94.1 5,098 >=95% 4,297 >=95% 4,102 94.6

Warren 208 87.5 7 * 0 -- 157 86.6 3 * 5 60.0 36 91.7 105 90.5 103 84.5

Wilson 767 94.5 0 -- 11 * 396 92.9 37 94.6 7 * 316 >=95% 400 >=95% 367 93.5

River Mill Academy** 34 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 8 * 2 * 3 * 21 >=95% 23 >=95% 11 *

Clover Garden** 22 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 21 >=95% 13 * 9 88.9

New Century Charter** 18 61.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 17 58.8 9 55.6 9 66.7

Woods Charter** 23 82.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 23 82.6 11 81.8 12 83.3

Kestrel Heights** 24 91.7 0 -- 1 * 18 94.4 2 * 1 * 2 * 13 84.6 11 *

Provisions Academy** 9 77.8 0 -- 0 -- 8 75.0 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 2 * 7 71.4

Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 45 82.2 0 -- 0 -- 33 81.8 1 * 1 * 10 80.0 22 81.8 23 82.6

Pace Academy** 13 69.2 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 0 -- 9 55.6 6 83.3 7 57.1

Roxboro Community** 13 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 9 88.9 7 * 6 83.3

Franklin Academy** 66 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 2 * 0 -- 63 >=95% 42 >=95% 24 >=95%

East Wake Academy** 44 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 2 * 1 * 37 86.5 27 88.9 17 88.2

Raleigh Charter HS** 127 >=95% 0 -- 6 83.3 4 * 0 -- 5 * 112 >=95% 68 >=95% 59 94.9

Community Partners High** 17 * 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 14 * 8 * 9 *Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 26 >=95% 23 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 24 >=95% 2 *Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

HispanicTotal American Indian Asian BlackGeneral Test

Central Region



Multi-Racial White Female Male

95








Percent Passing

State 94,149 93.0 2,984 89.7 91,165 93.2 2,958 90.0 0 -- 28 57.1 94,121 93.1Central Region 30,203 91.2 231 88.7 29,972 91.2 220 90.5 0 -- 11 54.5 30,192 91.2Alamance-Burlington 1,612 86.3 1 * 1,611 86.3 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,611 86.3Caswell 220 90.5 220 90.5 0 -- 220 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 220 90.5Chatham 523 89.9 1 * 522 89.8 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 522 89.8Durham 2,044 79.8 0 -- 2,044 79.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,044 79.8Franklin 529 >=95% 0 -- 529 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 529 >=95%Granville 566 >=95% 0 -- 566 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 566 >=95%Guilford 5,097 87.2 0 -- 5,097 87.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5,097 87.2Harnett 1,271 87.3 1 * 1,270 87.4 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,270 87.4Johnston 1,838 >=95% 3 * 1,835 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,835 >=95%Lee 633 87.7 3 * 630 87.8 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 630 87.8Nash-Rocky Mount 1,221 93.4 1 * 1,220 93.4 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,220 93.4Orange 520 93.5 0 -- 520 93.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 520 93.5Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 862 >=95% 0 -- 862 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 862 >=95%Person 380 94.7 0 -- 380 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 380 94.7Randolph 1,176 94.7 0 -- 1,176 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,176 94.7Asheboro City 258 >=95% 0 -- 258 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 258 >=95%Rockingham 1,020 >=95% 1 * 1,019 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1,019 >=95%Vance 578 79.1 0 -- 578 79.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 578 79.1Wake 8,399 94.8 0 -- 8,399 94.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 8,399 94.8Warren 208 87.5 0 -- 208 87.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 208 87.5Wilson 767 94.5 0 -- 767 94.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 767 94.5River Mill Academy** 34 >=95% 0 -- 34 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 34 >=95%Clover Garden** 22 >=95% 0 -- 22 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 22 >=95%New Century Charter** 18 61.1 0 -- 18 61.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 18 61.1Woods Charter** 23 82.6 0 -- 23 82.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 23 82.6Kestrel Heights** 24 91.7 0 -- 24 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 24 91.7Provisions Academy** 9 77.8 0 -- 9 77.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 9 77.8Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 45 82.2 0 -- 45 82.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 45 82.2Pace Academy** 13 69.2 0 -- 13 69.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 69.2Roxboro Community** 13 92.3 0 -- 13 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 92.3Franklin Academy** 66 >=95% 0 -- 66 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 66 >=95%East Wake Academy** 44 88.6 0 -- 44 88.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 44 88.6Raleigh Charter HS** 127 >=95% 0 -- 127 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 127 >=95%Community Partners High** 17 * 0 -- 17 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 17 *Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 26 >=95% 0 -- 26 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 26 >=95%Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

General Test

for the Class of 2009 at the End of Grade 11, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsTable 21l. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard1

Central Region

96


Program










Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6

Western Region 5,897 >=95% 59 >=95% 52 94.2 348 93.4 240 89.6 85 92.9 5,113 >=95% 2,904 >=95% 2,993 >=95%

Buncombe 1,478 >=95% 11 * 16 * 90 >=95% 63 >=95% 36 >=95% 1,262 >=95% 750 >=95% 728 >=95%

Asheville City 247 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 70 >=95% 11 90.9 8 87.5 157 >=95% 111 >=95% 136 >=95%

Cherokee 234 >=95% 6 * 2 * 6 * 7 * 3 * 210 >=95% 118 >=95% 116 >=95%

Clay 78 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 76 >=95% 34 >=95% 44 >=95%

Graham 78 >=95% 7 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 70 >=95% 37 >=95% 41 >=95%

Haywood 476 >=95% 1 * 3 * 5 80.0 14 92.9 4 * 449 >=95% 231 >=95% 245 >=95%

Henderson 843 89.1 0 -- 8 87.5 24 83.3 61 88.5 11 72.7 739 89.6 386 88.6 457 89.5

Jackson 225 >=95% 9 * 0 -- 3 * 7 85.7 3 * 203 >=95% 111 >=95% 114 93.0

Macon 242 >=95% 0 -- 2 * 4 * 8 87.5 5 * 223 >=95% 111 >=95% 131 >=95%

Madison 135 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 132 >=95% 66 >=95% 69 >=95%

McDowell 388 >=95% 3 * 9 * 17 * 15 86.7 3 * 341 >=95% 198 >=95% 190 >=95%

Mitchell 143 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 141 >=95% 76 >=95% 67 >=95%

Polk 155 >=95% 0 -- 2 * 15 * 9 * 1 * 128 >=95% 82 >=95% 73 >=95%

Rutherford 651 92.0 1 * 2 * 102 90.2 29 69.0 7 85.7 510 93.7 319 93.7 332 90.4

Swain 109 >=95% 21 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 84 >=95% 53 >=95% 56 >=95%

Transylvania 238 >=95% 0 -- 5 * 10 90.0 5 80.0 3 * 215 >=95% 126 >=95% 112 >=95%

Yancey 151 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 2 * 0 -- 147 >=95% 83 >=95% 68 >=95%

Thomas Jefferson** 26 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 26 >=95% 12 * 14 *


MaleMulti-Racial White

Western Region

Total American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Female



General Test

97


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Western Region 5,897 >=95% 386 >=95% 5,511 >=95% 383 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 5,894 >=95%

Buncombe 1,478 >=95% 3 * 1,475 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,475 >=95%Asheville City 247 >=95% 0 -- 247 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 247 >=95%Cherokee 234 >=95% 234 >=95% 0 -- 234 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 234 >=95%Clay 78 >=95% 0 -- 78 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 >=95%Graham 78 >=95% 0 -- 78 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 78 >=95%Haywood 476 >=95% 0 -- 476 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 476 >=95%Henderson 843 89.1 0 -- 843 89.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 843 89.1Jackson 225 >=95% 0 -- 225 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 225 >=95%Macon 242 >=95% 6 * 236 >=95% 6 * 0 -- 0 -- 242 >=95%Madison 135 >=95% 0 -- 135 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 135 >=95%McDowell 388 >=95% 0 -- 388 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 388 >=95%Mitchell 143 >=95% 143 >=95% 0 -- 143 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 143 >=95%Polk 155 >=95% 0 -- 155 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 155 >=95%Rutherford 651 92.0 0 -- 651 92.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 651 92.0Swain 109 >=95% 0 -- 109 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 109 >=95%Transylvania 238 >=95% 0 -- 238 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 238 >=95%Yancey 151 >=95% 0 -- 151 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 151 >=95%Thomas Jefferson** 26 >=95% 0 -- 26 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 26 >=95%



Migrant Not MigrantTargeted AssistanceSchoolwide Title I

Program

98



for the Class of 2008 at the End of Grade 12, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsWestern Region

General Test


MembershipPercent Passing Membership








Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6

Northwest Region 13,337 >=95% 28 >=95% 375 >=95% 1,980 93.7 698 94.0 210 >=95% 10,046 >=95% 6,607 >=95% 6,730 >=95%

Alexander 343 >=95% 0 -- 16 * 23 >=95% 11 * 4 * 289 >=95% 163 >=95% 180 >=95%

Alleghany 121 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 10 * 1 * 109 >=95% 53 >=95% 68 94.1

Ashe 192 >=95% 2 * 1 * 1 * 3 * 1 * 184 >=95% 88 >=95% 104 >=95%

Avery 122 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6 83.3 0 -- 116 >=95% 53 >=95% 69 >=95%

Burke 914 >=95% 3 * 105 >=95% 70 85.7 38 94.7 13 92.3 685 >=95% 462 >=95% 452 >=95%

Caldwell 783 >=95% 2 * 11 * 54 >=95% 29 >=95% 13 92.3 674 >=95% 392 >=95% 391 >=95%

Catawba 1,081 >=95% 3 * 80 >=95% 67 92.5 33 90.9 24 >=95% 874 >=95% 520 >=95% 561 >=95%

Hickory City 290 87.9 0 -- 20 85.0 65 78.5 27 74.1 6 * 172 93.6 147 89.1 143 86.7

Newton-Conover City 207 82.1 0 -- 21 90.5 40 82.5 19 84.2 4 * 123 79.7 112 88.4 95 74.7

Davidson 1,319 >=95% 6 * 9 88.9 41 >=95% 44 >=95% 10 90.0 1,209 >=95% 678 >=95% 641 >=95%

Lexington City 143 81.1 1 * 6 83.3 69 88.4 21 85.7 7 * 39 64.1 77 88.3 66 72.7

Thomasville City 140 90.7 0 -- 0 -- 77 88.3 17 94.1 1 * 45 93.3 68 91.2 72 90.3

Davie 411 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 40 >=95% 11 * 6 * 353 >=95% 211 >=95% 200 >=95%

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,111 >=95% 6 * 52 92.3 1,078 >=95% 204 94.6 80 >=95% 1,691 >=95% 1,555 >=95% 1,556 >=95%

Iredell-Statesville 1,189 >=95% 2 * 34 >=95% 174 92.5 74 >=95% 7 * 898 >=95% 559 >=95% 630 >=95%

Mooresville City 369 >=95% 0 -- 4 * 63 93.7 10 * 6 * 286 >=95% 218 >=95% 151 >=95%

Stokes 501 >=95% 1 * 1 * 25 >=95% 9 * 6 * 459 >=95% 232 >=95% 269 >=95%

Surry 535 >=95% 1 * 1 * 22 >=95% 43 >=95% 6 * 462 >=95% 251 >=95% 284 >=95%

Elkin City 101 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 3 * 15 * 2 * 80 >=95% 51 >=95% 50 >=95%

Mount Airy City 128 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 12 * 4 * 2 * 107 >=95% 58 >=95% 70 >=95%

Watauga 304 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 1 * 6 * 5 * 289 >=95% 130 >=95% 174 >=95%

Wilkes 601 >=95% 0 -- 7 * 27 >=95% 27 88.9 2 * 538 >=95% 314 >=95% 287 >=95%

Yadkin 420 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 17 * 37 >=95% 4 * 362 >=95% 208 >=95% 212 >=95%

Crossnore Academy** 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 3 * 0 --

C.G. Woodson** 9 88.9 0 -- 0 -- 9 88.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4 * 5 80.0Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White

Northwest Region

Total



General Test

American Indian Asian Female Male

99


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Northwest Region 13,337 >=95% 19 78.9 13,318 >=95% 18 77.8 0 -- 1 * 13,336 >=95%

Alexander 343 >=95% 0 -- 343 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 343 >=95%

Alleghany 121 >=95% 0 -- 121 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 121 >=95%

Ashe 192 >=95% 0 -- 192 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 192 >=95%

Avery 122 >=95% 0 -- 122 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 122 >=95%

Burke 914 >=95% 0 -- 914 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 914 >=95%

Caldwell 783 >=95% 12 91.7 771 >=95% 12 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 783 >=95%

Catawba 1,081 >=95% 0 -- 1,081 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,081 >=95%

Hickory City 290 87.9 4 * 286 88.5 4 * 0 -- 0 -- 290 87.9


Davidson 1,319 >=95% 0 -- 1,319 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,319 >=95%

Lexington City 143 81.1 0 -- 143 81.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 143 81.1


Davie 411 >=95% 0 -- 411 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 411 >=95%

Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,111 >=95% 0 -- 3,111 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3,111 >=95%

Iredell-Statesville 1,189 >=95% 2 * 1,187 >=95% 2 * 0 -- 0 -- 1,189 >=95%

Mooresville City 369 >=95% 0 -- 369 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 369 >=95%

Stokes 501 >=95% 0 -- 501 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 501 >=95%

Surry 535 >=95% 1 * 534 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 534 >=95%

Elkin City 101 >=95% 0 -- 101 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 101 >=95%

Mount Airy City 128 >=95% 0 -- 128 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 128 >=95%

Watauga 304 >=95% 0 -- 304 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 304 >=95%

Wilkes 601 >=95% 0 -- 601 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 601 >=95%

Yadkin 420 >=95% 0 -- 420 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 420 >=95%

Crossnore Academy** 3 * 0 -- 3 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3 *C.G. Woodson** 9 88.9 0 -- 9 88.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 9 88.9

Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found i 0 Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Not Served by Title I

General Test

100

Not Migrant

Northwest Region



Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance MigrantTotal Served by Title I










Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6

Southwest Region 19,188 >=95% 178 93.3 516 >=95% 5,614 93.9 1,159 93.4 257 >=95% 11,464 >=95% 9,868 >=95% 9,320 >=95%

Anson 217 94.9 0 -- 6 * 136 94.1 0 -- 0 -- 75 >=95% 116 >=95% 101 91.1

Cabarrus 1,588 >=95% 7 * 29 >=95% 253 >=95% 95 >=95% 35 >=95% 1,169 >=95% 796 >=95% 792 >=95%

Kannapolis City 235 >=95% 0 -- 5 * 70 >=95% 29 89.7 6 * 125 >=95% 117 >=95% 118 >=95%

Cleveland 1,029 91.6 2 * 12 75.0 296 91.9 17 88.2 14 92.9 688 91.9 510 92.9 519 90.4

Gaston 2,008 >=95% 6 * 43 >=95% 374 >=95% 88 >=95% 22 >=95% 1,475 >=95% 1,033 >=95% 975 >=95%

Hoke 359 >=95% 48 >=95% 1 * 204 >=95% 24 >=95% 12 * 70 >=95% 203 >=95% 156 94.9

Lincoln 806 94.2 2 * 3 * 70 88.6 44 86.4 12 * 675 >=95% 388 >=95% 418 93.1

Charlotte/Mecklenburg 6,740 >=95% 27 >=95% 325 >=95% 2,787 >=95% 559 93.7 77 >=95% 2,965 >=95% 3,555 >=95% 3,185 >=95%

Montgomery 275 >=95% 0 -- 5 * 82 >=95% 39 >=95% 4 * 145 >=95% 131 >=95% 144 >=95%

Moore 909 >=95% 11 * 5 * 192 >=95% 43 88.4 16 * 642 >=95% 464 >=95% 445 >=95%

Richmond 453 94.9 16 87.5 3 * 179 95.0 21 >=95% 3 * 231 94.8 245 >=95% 208 94.2

Rowan-Salisbury 1,320 >=95% 2 * 17 88.2 250 90.0 44 88.6 15 93.3 992 >=95% 655 >=95% 665 >=95%

Scotland 420 87.9 42 88.1 8 87.5 185 82.7 2 * 5 80.0 178 93.8 219 88.1 201 87.6

Stanly 659 >=95% 1 * 30 >=95% 97 >=95% 10 * 6 * 515 >=95% 325 >=95% 334 >=95%

Union 1,948 93.0 9 77.8 23 91.3 321 90.3 140 91.4 29 >=95% 1,426 93.8 1,001 92.9 947 93.1

Piedmont Community** 14 92.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 1 * 12 * 6 * 8 87.5

Lincoln Charter** 38 >=95% 2 * 0 -- 1 * 1 * 0 -- 34 >=95% 17 * 21 >=95%

Kennedy Charter** 76 72.4 0 -- 0 -- 74 73.0 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 30 86.7 46 63.0

Crossroads Charter** 30 86.7 0 -- 1 * 26 88.5 1 * 0 -- 2 * 16 81.3 14 92.9

Laurinburg Homework** 21 90.5 3 * 0 -- 17 88.2 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 10 90.0 11 90.9

Gray Stone Day** 43 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 42 92.9 31 93.5 12 91.7Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.




General Test

Female MaleBlack

Southwest Region

Hispanic Multi-Racial WhiteTotal American Indian Asian

101


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Southwest Region 19,188 >=95% 3 * 19,185 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 19,185 >=95%Anson 217 94.9 0 -- 217 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 217 94.9Cabarrus 1,588 >=95% 0 -- 1,588 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,588 >=95%Kannapolis City 235 >=95% 0 -- 235 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 235 >=95%Cleveland 1,029 91.6 0 -- 1,029 91.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,029 91.6Gaston 2,008 >=95% 0 -- 2,008 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2,008 >=95%Hoke 359 >=95% 1 * 358 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 358 >=95%Lincoln 806 94.2 0 -- 806 94.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 806 94.2Charlotte/Mecklenburg 6,740 >=95% 0 -- 6,740 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 6,740 >=95%Montgomery 275 >=95% 0 -- 275 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 275 >=95%Moore 909 >=95% 0 -- 909 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 909 >=95%Richmond 453 94.9 0 -- 453 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 453 94.9Rowan-Salisbury 1,320 >=95% 2 * 1,318 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 1,318 >=95%Scotland 420 87.9 0 -- 420 87.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 420 87.9Stanly 659 >=95% 0 -- 659 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 659 >=95%Union 1,948 93.0 0 -- 1,948 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,948 93.0Piedmont Community** 14 92.9 0 -- 14 92.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 14 92.9Lincoln Charter** 38 >=95% 0 -- 38 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 38 >=95%Kennedy Charter** 76 72.4 0 -- 76 72.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 76 72.4Crossroads Charter** 30 86.7 0 -- 30 86.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 30 86.7Laurinburg Homework** 21 90.5 0 -- 21 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 21 90.5Gray Stone Day** 43 93.0 0 -- 43 93.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 43 93.0


Targeted Assistance Migrant

102

Table 22f. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard 1

for the Class of 2008 at the End of Grade 12, by LEA, Title I, and Migrant StudentsSouthwest Region

General Test

Not MigrantTotal Served by Title I Not Served by Title ISchoolwide Title I

Program


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6

Northeast Region 5,361 91.0 24 91.7 30 93.3 2,624 89.4 123 93.5 53 >=95% 2,507 92.3 2,803 92.2 2,558 89.7

Beaufort 385 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 156 89.7 12 * 5 * 212 >=95% 197 94.4 188 93.6

Bertie 218 91.7 0 -- 1 * 188 92.0 0 -- 1 * 28 92.9 115 91.3 103 92.2

Camden 135 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 18 * 2 * 2 * 112 >=95% 62 >=95% 73 >=95%

Edenton/Chowan 127 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 64 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 61 >=95% 70 >=95% 57 >=95%

Currituck 288 >=95% 4 * 1 * 22 90.9 9 * 5 * 247 >=95% 150 >=95% 138 94.2

Dare 349 92.3 1 * 3 * 9 77.8 11 72.7 5 * 320 93.4 172 91.9 177 92.7

Edgecombe 441 65.1 0 -- 0 -- 270 74.8 14 92.9 0 -- 157 45.9 236 65.3 205 64.9

Gates 132 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 54 94.4 1 * 0 -- 76 >=95% 63 >=95% 69 >=95%

Halifax 303 92.1 14 * 0 -- 276 92.0 1 * 0 -- 12 83.3 167 >=95% 136 86.8

Roanoke Rapids City 179 >=95% 1 * 6 * 33 93.9 5 * 2 * 132 >=95% 97 >=95% 82 >=95%

Weldon City 64 90.6 1 * 0 -- 60 93.3 0 -- 1 * 2 * 33 93.9 31 87.1

Hertford 227 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 187 88.2 3 * 1 * 36 86.1 112 89.3 115 87.0

Hyde 44 84.1 0 -- 0 -- 21 76.2 1 * 1 * 21 90.5 26 92.3 18 72.2

Martin 283 90.5 1 * 0 -- 164 86.0 7 * 0 -- 111 >=95% 163 93.3 120 86.7

Northampton 207 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 180 >=95% 1 * 1 * 25 >=95% 119 >=95% 88 >=95%

Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 412 90.8 1 * 3 * 203 92.1 4 * 11 90.9 190 88.9 217 93.5 195 87.7

Perquimans 107 93.5 0 -- 0 -- 46 84.8 1 * 0 -- 60 >=95% 48 91.7 59 94.9

Pitt 1,281 93.3 1 * 13 * 549 88.9 44 >=95% 16 * 658 >=95% 665 94.7 616 91.7

Tyrrell 38 81.6 0 -- 0 -- 15 86.7 5 60.0 0 -- 18 83.3 18 88.9 20 75.0

Washington 141 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 109 >=95% 1 * 2 * 29 >=95% 73 >=95% 68 >=95%Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

103



General Test

Female MaleBlack

Northeast Region



Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Northeast Region 5,361 91.0 283 90.5 5,078 91.0 283 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 5,361 91.0Beaufort 385 94.0 0 -- 385 94.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 385 94.0Bertie 218 91.7 0 -- 218 91.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 218 91.7Camden 135 >=95% 0 -- 135 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 135 >=95%Edenton/Chowan 127 >=95% 0 -- 127 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 127 >=95%Currituck 288 >=95% 0 -- 288 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 288 >=95%Dare 349 92.3 0 -- 349 92.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 349 92.3Edgecombe 441 65.1 0 -- 441 65.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 441 65.1Gates 132 >=95% 0 -- 132 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 132 >=95%Halifax 303 92.1 0 -- 303 92.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 303 92.1Roanoke Rapids City 179 >=95% 0 -- 179 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 179 >=95%Weldon City 64 90.6 0 -- 64 90.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 64 90.6Hertford 227 88.1 0 -- 227 88.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 227 88.1Hyde 44 84.1 0 -- 44 84.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 44 84.1Martin 283 90.5 283 90.5 0 -- 283 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 283 90.5Northampton 207 >=95% 0 -- 207 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 207 >=95%Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 412 90.8 0 -- 412 90.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 412 90.8Perquimans 107 93.5 0 -- 107 93.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 107 93.5Pitt 1,281 93.3 0 -- 1,281 93.3 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,281 93.3Tyrrell 38 81.6 0 -- 38 81.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 38 81.6Washington 141 >=95% 0 -- 141 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 141 >=95%


104


Program

Northeast RegionGeneral Test




Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6

Southeast Region 14,089 >=95% 681 >=95% 164 >=95% 4,915 >=95% 685 >=95% 365 >=95% 7,279 >=95% 7,150 >=95% 6,939 >=95%

Bladen 303 93.1 2 * 1 * 170 90.6 6 * 2 * 122 >=95% 146 >=95% 157 90.4

Brunswick 694 >=95% 4 * 2 * 147 >=95% 24 >=95% 14 * 503 >=95% 337 >=95% 357 >=95%

Carteret 483 94.2 1 * 6 * 48 89.6 18 94.4 7 71.4 403 >=95% 249 >=95% 234 93.2

Columbus 400 91.3 29 >=95% 0 -- 168 85.7 8 87.5 0 -- 195 >=95% 205 92.2 195 90.3

Whiteville City 151 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 78 91.0 3 * 0 -- 69 >=95% 76 >=95% 75 93.3

Craven 947 >=95% 1 * 8 * 290 >=95% 32 >=95% 27 >=95% 589 >=95% 489 >=95% 458 >=95%

Cumberland 3,322 >=95% 55 >=95% 62 >=95% 1,580 >=95% 202 >=95% 116 >=95% 1,307 >=95% 1,716 >=95% 1,606 >=95%

Duplin 447 >=95% 1 * 1 * 166 >=95% 52 94.2 5 * 222 >=95% 235 >=95% 212 >=95%

Greene 171 87.7 0 -- 0 -- 87 88.5 15 86.7 0 -- 69 87.0 83 88.0 88 87.5

Jones 64 90.6 0 -- 0 -- 47 89.4 0 -- 1 * 16 93.8 32 >=95% 32 84.4

Lenoir 598 91.8 1 * 5 80.0 285 89.1 22 90.9 4 * 281 >=95% 304 94.1 294 89.5

New Hanover 1,490 >=95% 8 * 19 * 329 94.5 51 >=95% 46 >=95% 1,037 >=95% 737 >=95% 753 >=95%

Onslow 1,389 >=95% 13 * 23 >=95% 319 >=95% 71 >=95% 91 >=95% 872 >=95% 700 >=95% 689 >=95%

Pamlico 136 94.9 0 -- 1 * 51 88.2 2 * 1 * 81 >=95% 65 >=95% 71 91.5

Pender 445 93.9 1 * 3 * 132 93.2 19 94.7 8 * 282 94.0 208 94.7 237 93.2

Robeson 1,297 93.8 550 94.4 12 91.7 390 92.1 47 93.6 10 90.0 288 >=95% 673 >=95% 624 91.3

Sampson 423 >=95% 7 * 3 * 134 >=95% 51 >=95% 4 * 224 >=95% 215 >=95% 208 94.2

Clinton City 160 >=95% 5 * 4 * 65 >=95% 12 * 0 -- 74 >=95% 90 >=95% 70 >=95%

Wayne 1,144 >=95% 2 * 14 * 424 >=95% 50 94.0 27 92.6 627 >=95% 583 >=95% 561 >=95%

Cape Lookout Marine** 25 76.0 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 0 -- 2 * 18 66.7 7 71.4 18 77.8Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Female MaleBlack



General TestSoutheast Region


105








Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Southeast Region 14,089 >=95% 1,817 92.4 12,272 >=95% 1,813 92.3 0 -- 4 * 14,085 >=95%Bladen 303 93.1 0 -- 303 93.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 303 93.1Brunswick 694 >=95% 0 -- 694 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 694 >=95%Carteret 483 94.2 0 -- 483 94.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 483 94.2Columbus 400 91.3 400 91.3 0 -- 400 91.3 0 -- 0 -- 400 91.3Whiteville City 151 >=95% 9 88.9 142 >=95% 6 83.3 0 -- 3 * 148 >=95%Craven 947 >=95% 0 -- 947 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 947 >=95%Cumberland 3,322 >=95% 93 94.6 3,229 >=95% 93 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 3,322 >=95%Duplin 447 >=95% 0 -- 447 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 447 >=95%Greene 171 87.7 0 -- 171 87.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 171 87.7Jones 64 90.6 0 -- 64 90.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 64 90.6Lenoir 598 91.8 17 * 581 94.5 17 * 0 -- 0 -- 598 91.8New Hanover 1,490 >=95% 0 -- 1,490 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,490 >=95%Onslow 1,389 >=95% 0 -- 1,389 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,389 >=95%Pamlico 136 94.9 0 -- 136 94.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 136 94.9Pender 445 93.9 0 -- 445 93.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 445 93.9Robeson 1,297 93.8 1,297 93.8 0 -- 1,297 93.8 0 -- 0 -- 1,297 93.8Sampson 423 >=95% 1 * 422 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 422 >=95%Clinton City 160 >=95% 0 -- 160 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 160 >=95%Wayne 1,144 >=95% 0 -- 1,144 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,144 >=95%Cape Lookout Marine** 25 76.0 0 -- 25 76.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 25 76.0



Program

Southeast RegionGeneral Test



106


Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

Member- ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 1,068 94.8 2,011 >=95% 23,914 92.7 4,448 93.2 1,620 >=95% 51,797 >=95% 43,075 >=95% 41,783 94.6Central Region 26,986 94.7 98 92.9 874 >=95% 8,433 91.3 1,543 91.7 650 94.5 15,388 >=95% 13,743 >=95% 13,243 93.9

Alamance-Burlington 1,372 91.0 6 83.3 29 93.1 337 86.6 87 77.0 32 93.8 881 94.0 690 92.8 682 89.3Caswell 187 94.1 1 * 1 * 80 >=95% 9 88.9 5 * 91 94.5 97 91.8 90 >=95%Chatham 506 92.3 3 * 2 * 106 90.6 84 83.3 19 89.5 292 >=95% 255 91.0 251 93.6Durham 1,931 88.0 1 * 48 93.8 1,049 84.7 111 83.8 67 88.1 655 93.7 1,037 89.2 894 86.7Franklin 547 >=95% 1 * 3 * 214 >=95% 27 >=95% 4 * 298 >=95% 278 >=95% 269 >=95%Granville 545 >=95% 0 -- 6 * 193 >=95% 27 >=95% 6 * 313 >=95% 282 >=95% 263 >=95%Guilford 4,678 92.6 15 * 247 90.3 1,800 89.7 206 89.3 138 92.8 2,272 >=95% 2,367 93.9 2,311 91.4Harnett 919 92.1 9 88.9 4 * 279 88.2 74 87.8 28 92.9 525 94.7 465 94.8 454 89.2Johnston 1,549 >=95% 6 * 9 88.9 276 90.9 111 >=95% 27 >=95% 1,120 >=95% 758 >=95% 791 >=95%Lee 507 90.5 4 * 5 80.0 109 90.8 89 83.1 9 77.8 291 93.8 260 90.4 247 90.7Nash-Rocky Mount 1,084 94.4 6 * 13 92.3 531 92.5 51 >=95% 11 * 472 >=95% 557 94.6 527 94.1Orange 463 87.9 3 * 6 * 90 82.2 9 66.7 7 * 348 89.7 247 89.1 216 86.6Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 787 >=95% 1 * 66 >=95% 85 >=95% 46 >=95% 29 93.1 560 >=95% 390 >=95% 397 >=95%Person 378 >=95% 2 * 1 * 125 >=95% 13 92.3 6 83.3 231 >=95% 188 >=95% 190 >=95%Randolph 1,115 >=95% 4 * 14 * 52 >=95% 58 >=95% 20 >=95% 967 >=95% 555 >=95% 560 >=95%Asheboro City 283 >=95% 0 -- 7 * 38 >=95% 60 >=95% 6 * 172 >=95% 147 >=95% 136 >=95%Rockingham 779 >=95% 4 * 4 * 205 >=95% 29 >=95% 16 87.5 521 >=95% 402 >=95% 377 >=95%Vance 444 84.9 0 -- 0 -- 312 83.7 18 77.8 0 -- 114 89.5 226 88.9 218 80.7Wake 7,597 >=95% 15 * 396 >=95% 1,973 >=95% 385 >=95% 202 >=95% 4,626 >=95% 3,837 >=95% 3,760 >=95%Warren 182 94.5 8 * 0 -- 140 93.6 2 * 1 * 31 >=95% 93 93.5 89 >=95%Wilson 706 94.6 1 * 7 85.7 369 93.0 31 90.3 6 * 292 >=95% 379 >=95% 327 92.7River Mill Academy** 29 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 6 * 0 -- 0 -- 23 >=95% 16 * 13 92.3Clover Garden** 13 * 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 1 * 11 * 5 * 8 *New Century Charter** 20 >=95% 1 * 0 -- 2 * 1 * 0 -- 16 * 13 * 7 *Woods Charter** 19 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 0 -- 18 88.9 7 85.7 12 83.3Kestrel Heights** 22 63.6 0 -- 0 -- 10 60.0 7 85.7 1 * 4 * 13 69.2 9 55.6Provisions Academy** 19 94.7 0 -- 1 * 14 92.9 0 0.0 0 -- 4 * 11 * 8 87.5Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 39 82.1 1 * 1 * 15 80.0 1 * 2 * 19 89.5 21 >=95% 18 66.7Pace Academy** 37 83.8 1 * 0 -- 8 75.0 1 * 1 * 26 88.5 19 94.7 18 72.2Franklin Academy** 42 >=95% 0 -- 1 * 4 * 1 * 1 * 35 >=95% 24 >=95% 18 *East Wake Academy** 30 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 5 * 1 * 2 * 22 >=95% 15 * 15 *Raleigh Charter HS** 122 >=95% 0 -- 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 113 >=95% 74 >=95% 48 >=95%Community Partners High** 30 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1 * 1 * 25 >=95% 13 * 17 *Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 5 * 5 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 * 3 *Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic and gender categories may not sum to total membership because either category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

General Test

Total

Central Region

107

Table 22k. 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing the Standard 1


American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Female Male


Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

Member-ship

Percent Passing

State 84,858 >=95% 2,699 93.0 82,159 >=95% 2,684 93.0 0 -- 15 93.3 84,843 >=95%Central Region 26,986 94.7 191 93.7 26,795 94.7 187 94.1 0 -- 4 * 26,982 94.7Alamance-Burlington 1,372 91.0 0 -- 1,372 91.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,372 91.0Caswell 187 94.1 187 94.1 0 -- 187 94.1 0 -- 0 -- 187 94.1Chatham 506 92.3 1 * 505 92.5 0 -- 0 -- 1 * 505 92.5Durham 1,931 88.0 0 -- 1,931 88.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,931 88.0Franklin 547 >=95% 0 -- 547 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 547 >=95%Granville 545 >=95% 0 -- 545 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 545 >=95%Guilford 4,678 92.6 0 -- 4,678 92.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 4,678 92.6Harnett 919 92.1 0 -- 919 92.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 919 92.1Johnston 1,549 >=95% 3 * 1,546 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 3 * 1,546 >=95%Lee 507 90.5 0 -- 507 90.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 507 90.5Nash-Rocky Mount 1,084 94.4 0 -- 1,084 94.4 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,084 94.4Orange 463 87.9 0 -- 463 87.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 463 87.9Chapel Hill-Carrboro City 787 >=95% 0 -- 787 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 787 >=95%Person 378 >=95% 0 -- 378 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 378 >=95%Randolph 1,115 >=95% 0 -- 1,115 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1,115 >=95%Asheboro City 283 >=95% 0 -- 283 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 283 >=95%Rockingham 779 >=95% 0 -- 779 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 779 >=95%Vance 444 84.9 0 -- 444 84.9 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 444 84.9Wake 7,597 >=95% 0 -- 7,597 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 7,597 >=95%Warren 182 94.5 0 -- 182 94.5 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 182 94.5Wilson 706 94.6 0 -- 706 94.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 706 94.6River Mill Academy** 29 >=95% 0 -- 29 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 29 >=95%Clover Garden** 13 * 0 -- 13 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 13 *New Century Charter** 20 >=95% 0 -- 20 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 20 >=95%Woods Charter** 19 84.2 0 -- 19 84.2 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 19 84.2Kestrel Heights** 22 63.6 0 -- 22 63.6 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 22 63.6Provisions Academy** 19 94.7 0 -- 19 94.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 19 94.7Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 39 82.1 0 -- 39 82.1 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 39 82.1Pace Academy** 37 83.8 0 -- 37 83.8 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 37 83.8Franklin Academy** 42 >=95% 0 -- 42 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 42 >=95%East Wake Academy** 30 >=95% 0 -- 30 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 30 >=95%Raleigh Charter HS** 122 >=95% 0 -- 122 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 122 >=95%Community Partners High** 30 >=95% 0 -- 30 >=95% 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 30 >=95%Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** 5 * 0 -- 5 * 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5 *Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.


Program

General TestCentral Region



108

109

Eighth Graders Taking the Performance Testfor the First Time in 2006-07 and 2007-08

110


Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Computer Skills Proficiency Standard , 2007-08

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00

Category MembershipNumber Passing

Percent Proficient Membership

Number Passing


Number Passing


Number Passing

Percent Proficient

All Students1 88,846 65,432 73.6 106,059 84,055 79.3 95,479 80,168 84.0 95,163 76,168 80.0Academically/Intellectually Gifted (AIG) AIG Reading * * * * * * * * * 1,812 1,572 86.8 AIG Mathematics * * * * * * * * * 1,102 1,098 99.6All Students with Disabilities2 8,768 4,007 45.7 11,861 6,077 51.2 11,054 6,963 63.0 10,570 6,264 59.3 Students with IEPs Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 859 333 38.8 1,222 484 39.6 1,084 573 52.9 971 453 46.7 Hearing Impaired 112 66 58.9 143 88 61.5 114 85 74.6 108 82 75.9 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,175 197 16.8 1,920 401 20.9 1,283 393 30.6 1,157 286 24.7 Specific Learning Disabled 5,389 2,758 51.2 7,033 4,133 58.8 6,458 4,423 68.5 6,561 4,329 66.0 Speech-Language Impaired 151 73 48.3 134 82 61.2 150 99 66.0 147 83 56.5 Visually Impaired 37 17 45.9 55 36 65.5 33 21 63.6 35 24 68.6 Other Health Impaired 568 289 50.9 863 512 59.3 880 570 64.8 1,068 665 62.3 Orthopedically Impaired 44 21 47.7 60 32 53.3 38 25 65.8 36 18 50.0 Traumatic Brain Injury 22 ** ** 19 ** ** 23 ** ** 28 ** ** Other Exceptional Classifications 98 56 57.1 152 86 56.6 168 120 71.4 236 146 61.9 Autistic 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** Multihandicapped 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** Deaf/Blind 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** Trainable Mentally Disabled 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** Section 504 313 185 59.1 260 211 81.2 823 642 78.0 223 163 73.1 Not Coded 360 211 58.6 3,846 2,885 75.0 2,761 2,087 75.6 1,944 1,358 69.9Limited English Proficient (LEP) 632 251 39.7 351 199 56.7 1,018 594 58.3 2,105 1,148 54.5Learning Disabled-Reading 3,526 1,664 47.2 2,528 1,478 58.5 3,977 2,610 65.6 5,360 3,493 65.2Learning Disabled-Mathematics 2,354 990 42.1 3,653 1,939 53.1 2,535 1,515 59.8 759 446 58.8Learning Disabled-Written Expression 4,602 2,321 50.4 4,127 2,398 58.1 5,512 3,769 68.4 8,750 8,318 95.1Learning Disabled-Other3 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 0 ** **Not Served by Title I 58,061 44,516 76.7 70,192 59,559 84.9 71,125 61,592 86.6 65,740 54,836 83.4Schoolwide Title I 7,985 5,307 66.5 10,794 8,597 79.6 12,281 10,011 81.5 12,985 9,737 75.0Targeted Assistance 869 470 54.1 806 586 72.7 996 754 75.7 1,230 904 73.5Migrant 176 74 42.0 209 125 59.8 439 265 60.4 138 88 63.8

*Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected. Prior to 1999-00, performance data for the Academically/Intellectually Gifted category were not collected by subjec

"Membership" and "Number Passing" totals for "All Students with Disabilities" data include all students with performance answer sheets coded as having a disability.

2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum

reported as a category starting in 2000-01. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

these two groups of students have been revised and are now reported as mutually exclusive groups across all years In previous years' reports, Section 504 students and all students with exceptionalities were sometimes counted in both categories; however, beginning with the 2001-02 Computer Skills Report, the data for

Prior to 2000-01, data for autistic, severely/profoundly mentally disabled, multihandicapped, deaf/blind, and trainable mentally disabled were combined under the Other Exceptional Classification (OEC). OEC is no longer

Table 23. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills8th Graders Taking the General Performance* Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (1996-97 through 2004-05), by School Year,

Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 through 2007-08), by School Year,

General Performance Test* of Computer Skills

All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8

Notes: 1The numbers of "All Students" across the years of 1996-97 to 2000-01 differ from previous years' reports due to programming changes. 2The totals for "All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category.

**Prior to 2003-04, performance data were not reported when membership was fewer than thirty.

3Data for "Learning Disabled-Other" are not reported prior to 2002-03 due to incomplete coding.

111


2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Member-ship

Number Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tMember-

shipNumber Passing

Percent Proficien

tAll Students1 99,480 75,362 75.8 94,533 77,035 81.5 106,201 89,432 84.2 108,609 92,009 84.7 109,741 94,066 85.7 111,004 71,584 64.5 111,030 74,999 67.5Academically/Intellectually Gifted (AIG) AIG Reading 10,586 10,456 98.8 10,365 10,287 99.3 11,977 11,944 99.7 12,554 ** >=95.0 11,987 * >=95% 11,145 * >=95 9,755 * >=95% AIG Mathematics 10,364 10,233 98.7 10,360 10,296 99.4 11,616 11,591 99.8 12,057 ** >=95.0 12,122 * >=95% 10,518 * >=95 9,851 * >=95% All Students with Disabilities2 13,254 6,462 48.8 13,297 7,664 57.6 15,325 9,475 61.8 15,172 9,686 63.8 15,647 10,375 66.3 16,803 6,314 37.6 15,285 5,927 38.8Students without Disabilities *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 93,552 83,241 89.0 94,201 65,270 69.3 95,745 69,072 72.1 Students with IEPs

Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,167 444 38.0 1,215 543 44.7 1,268 637 50.2 1,280 661 51.6 1,250 673 53.8 1,256 312 24.8 966 263 27.2 Hearing Impaired 118 67 56.8 141 99 70.2 120 86 71.7 106 72 67.9 180 112 62.2 142 53 37.3 141 58 41.1 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,870 361 19.3 2,023 526 26.0 2,308 666 28.9 2,265 702 31.0 2,066 729 35.3 2,152 188 8.7 1,872 164 8.8 Specific Learning Disabled 7,325 3,979 54.3 6,974 4,499 64.5 7,788 5,370 69.0 7,026 4,960 70.6 6,466 4,685 72.5 6,661 2,964 44.5 5,905 2,624 44.4

Learning Disabled-Reading 4,837 2,473 51.1 4,859 2,978 61.3 5,608 3,736 66.6 5,314 3,627 68.3 5,423 3,850 71.0 4,193 2,047 48.8 4,407 1,775 40.3 Learning Disabled-Mathematics 3,002 1,266 42.2 2,864 1,487 51.9 3,065 1,769 57.7 2,732 1,605 58.7 2,769 1,727 62.4 2,511 1,111 44.2 2,637 954 36.2 Learning Disabled-Written Expression 6,256 3,374 53.9 5,856 3,783 64.6 6,042 4,154 68.8 5,752 4,060 70.6 5,276 3,840 72.8 3,396 1,738 51.2 3,312 1,402 42.3 Learning Disabled-Other3 0 ** ** 0 ** 0 132 88 66.7 174 112 64.4 166 111 66.9 1047 963 92.0 175 63 36.0

Speech-Language Impaired 146 87 59.6 167 113 67.7 218 150 68.8 194 130 67.0 188 126 67.0 393 201 51.1 348 185 53.2 Visually Impaired 47 19 40.4 33 23 69.7 46 33 71.7 56 41 73.2 49 35 71.4 54 26 48.1 51 22 43.1 Other Health Impaired 53 23 43.4 44 27 61.4 1,878 1,215 64.7 2,135 1,460 68.4 2,414 1,664 68.9 2,708 1,044 38.6 2,673 1,058 39.6 Orthopedically Impaired 36 13 36.1 28 ** ** 55 29 52.7 68 47 69.1 43 30 69.8 69 32 46.4 87 38 43.7 Traumatic Brain Injury 13 ** ** 23 ** ** 44 20 45.5 51 27 52.9 41 22 53.7 50 19 38.0 46 10 21.7 Autistic 0 ** ** 0 ** ** 106 73 68.9 114 64 56.1 885 598 67.6 498 124 24.9 479 136 28.4 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 1 ** ** 0 ** ** 2 ** ** 1 ** ** 0 * * 63 * <=5% 51 * <=5% Multihandicapped 40 20 50.0 48 28 58.3 15 ** ** 12 3 25.0 16 4 25.0 154 * <=5% 144 * <=5% Deaf/Blind 15 ** ** 11 ** ** 1 ** ** † ** ** 7 4 57.1 4 * * 0 * * Trainable Mentally Disabled 1,369 737 53.8 1,403 890 63.4 † ** ** 24 3 12.5 42 16 38.1 322 * <=5% 308 * <=5% Not Coded 2,769 1,874 67.7 1,835 1,400 76.3 1,817 1,468 80.8 2,672 2,293 85.8 544 454 83.5 2,114 1,185 56.1 2,039 1,192 58.5 Section 504 1,054 710 67.4 1,187 900 75.8 1,448 1,191 82.3 1,723 1,432 83.1 2,000 1,677 83.9 2,277 1,342 58.9 2,060 1,231 59.8

Limited English Proficient (LEP) 1,382 677 49.0 1,440 781 54.2 1,997 1,165 58.3 2,470 1,478 59.8 3,093 1,921 62.1 4,301 1,193 27.7 4,910 1,469 29.9Not Limited English Proficient *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 106,648 92,145 86.4 106,703 70,391 66.0 106,120 73,530 69.3Title I *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 19,380 16,118 83.2 22,380 11,661 52.1 23,235 13,831 59.5Not Title I 74,620 58,923 79.0 72,564 61,038 84.1 85,359 73,079 85.6 82,140 70,634 86.0 81,107 71,179 87.8 88,624 59,923 67.6 87,795 61,168 69.7Schoolwide Title I 12,808 8,764 68.4 13,106 9,903 75.6 18,658 14,751 79.1 19,660 15,658 79.6 17,779 14,920 83.9 21,995 11,536 52.4 21,838 13,062 59.8Targeted Assistance 938 575 61.3 1,553 1,069 68.8 813 575 70.7 1,144 805 70.4 1,435 1,096 76.4 219 65 29.7 934 569 60.9Migrant 142 77 54.2 116 77 66.4 370 227 61.4 622 482 77.5 408 272 66.7 266 91 34.2 1,170 662 56.6Not Migrant *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 100,079 87,025 87.0 110,738 71,493 64.6 109,860 74,337 67.7

"Membership" and "Number Passing" totals for "All Students with Disabilities" data include all students with performance answer sheets coded as having a disability. *Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are collected centrally. **Prior to 2003-04, performance data were not reported when membership was fewer than thirty. Beginning in 2003-04, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. ***Data for "Students with Disabilities," "Not LEP," "Title I," and "Not Migrant" are reported beginning in 2004-05.

†The data were coded incorrectly and are therefore not reliable.

Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students (continued)

In previous years' reports, Section 504 students and all students with exceptionalities were sometimes counted in both categories; however, beginning with the 2001-02 Computer Skills Report, the data for these two

Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum.

Online Test of Computer Skills

All data use "Membership" as the denominator.

General Performance Test* of Computer Skills

Table 23. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the General Performance* Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (1996-97 through 2004-05), by School Year,

112

Notes: 1The numbers of "All Students" across the years of 1996-97 to 2000-01 differ from previous years' reports due to programming changes. 2The totals for "All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category.

of students have been revised and are now reported as mutually exclusive groups across all years.

Category

3Data for "Learning Disabled-Other" are not reported prior to 2002-03 due to incomplete coding.


8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 through 2007-08), by School Year,


MembershipNumber Passing

Percent Proficient

All Students 112,824 78,778 69.8Academically/Intellectually Gifted AIG - Reading 13,874 * >=95% AIG - Mathematics 14,714 * >=95% All Students with Disabilities1 16,191 6,266 38.7Students without Disabilities 96,633 72,512 75.0 Students with IEPs 13,957 4,812 34.5

621 186 30.01 * * 0 * *

1,054 333 31.6151 65 43.0

1,909 205 10.7355 * <=5% 56 * <=5%

6163 2,617 42.54,009 1,579 39.42,553 878 34.42,999 1,181 39.4199 74 37.2153 * <=5%

3,116 1,214 39.057 29 50.9

236 122 51.7Traumatic Brain Injury 37 13 35.1

48 20 41.70 0 0.0

2,234 1,454 65.1Limited English Proficient (LEP) 6,037 2,238 37.1Not Limited English Proficient 106,787 76,540 71.7Title I 16,497 10,235 62.0Not Title I 96,327 68,543 71.2Schoolwide Title I 15,982 10,073 63.0Targeted Assistance 452 137 30.3Migrant 89 35 39.3Not Migrant 112,735 78,743 69.8

*Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are collected centrally. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilities (CECAS).

Learning Disability - ReadingSpecific Learning Disability

DeafnessSerious Emotional DisabilityHearing ImpairmentIntellectual Disability - Mild

Intellectual Disability - SevereIntellectual Disability - Moderate

Other Health Impairment

Speech or Language Impairment

2007-08

Table 23. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time, 2007-08

Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students (continued)Online Test of Computer Skills

AutismDeaf-Blindness

Category

Multiple Disabilities

Notes: All data use "Membership" as the denominator. 1The totals for "All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category.

Learning Disability - Mathematics

Section 504 Not Coded

Learning Disability - Written Expression

Visual Impairment incl. Blindness

Learning Disability - Other


Orthopedic Impairment

"Membership" and "Number Passing" totals for "All Students with Disabilities" data include all students with performance answer sheets coded as having a disability.

Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum.

Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report.

113


1996-97 N Passing = 65,432 N Passing = 4,007Membership= 88,846 Membership= 8,768












Notes: *Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. The vertical lines between the years in the legend indicates that the edition of the tests changed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

114

Figure 26. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the General Performance* Test for the First Time (1996-97 to 2004-05), by School Year,

8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 to 2007-08), by School Year,Students with Disabilities

73.6

45.7

79.3

51.2

84.0

63.0

80.0

59.3

75.8

48.8

81.5

57.6

84.2

61.8

84.7

63.8

85.7

66.364.5

37.6

67.5

38.8

69.8

38.7

0102030405060708090

100

State Students with Disabilities

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-062006-07 2007-08


1996-97 N Passing = 65,432 N Passing = 4,007 N Passing = 333 N Passing = 66 N Passing = 197 N Passing =2,758 N Passing = 73 N Passing =17 N Passing = 289Membership= 88,846 Membership= 8,768 Membership= 859 Membership=112 Membership=1,175 Membership=5,389 Membership=151 Membership=37 Membership= 568

1997-98 N Passing = 84,055 N Passing = 6,077 N Passing = 484 N Passing = 88 N Passing = 401 N Passing =4,133 N Passing = 82 N Passing =36 N Passing = 512Membership=106,059 Membership=11,861 Membership=1,222 Membership=143 Membership=1,920 Membership=7,033 Membership=134 Membership=55 Membership= 863

1998-99 N Passing = 80,168 N Passing = 6,963 N Passing = 573 N Passing = 85 N Passing = 393 N Passing =4,423 N Passing = 99 N Passing =21 N Passing = 570Membership= 95,479 Membership=11,054 Membership=1,084 Membership=114 Membership=1,283 Membership=6,458 Membership=150 Membership=33 Membership= 880

1999-00 N Passing = 76,168 N Passing = 6,264 N Passing = 453 N Passing = 82 N Passing = 286 N Passing =4,329 N Passing = 83 N Passing =24 N Passing = 665Membership= 95,163 Membership=10,570 Membership= 971 Membership=108 Membership=1,157 Membership=6,561 Membership=147 Membership=35 Membership=1,068

2000-01 N Passing = 75,362 N Passing = 6,462 N Passing = 444 N Passing = 67 N Passing = 361 N Passing =3,979 N Passing = 87 N Passing =19 N Passing = 23Membership= 99,480 Membership=13,254 Membership=1,167 Membership=118 Membership=1,870 Membership=7,325 Membership=146 Membership=47 Membership= 53

2001-02 N Passing = 77,035 N Passing = 7,664 N Passing = 543 N Passing = 99 N Passing = 526 N Passing =4,499 N Passing =113 N Passing =23 N Passing = 27Membership= 94,533 Membership=13,297 Membership=1,215 Membership=141 Membership=2,023 Membership=6,974 Membership=167 Membership=33 Membership= 44

2002-03 N Passing = 89,432 N Passing = 9,475 N Passing = 637 N Passing = 86 N Passing = 666 N Passing =5,370 N Passing =150 N Passing =33 N Passing =1,215Membership=106,201 Membership=15,325 Membership=1,268 Membership=120 Membership=2,308 Membership=7,788 Membership=218 Membership=46 Membership=1,878

2003-04 N Passing = 92,009 N Passing = 9,686 N Passing = 661 N Passing = 72 N Passing = 702 N Passing =4,960 N Passing =130 N Passing =41 N Passing =1,460Membership=108,609 Membership=15,172 Membership=1,280 Membership=106 Membership=2,265 Membership=7,026 Membership=194 Membership=56 Membership=2,135

2004-05 N Passing = 94,066 N Passing =10,375 N Passing = 673 N Passing = 112 N Passing = 729 N Passing =4,685 N Passing =126 N Passing =35 N Passing =1,664Membership=109,741 Membership=15,647 Membership=1,250 Membership=180 Membership=2,066 Membership=6,466 Membership=188 Membership=49 Membership=2,414

2005-06 N Passing = 71,584 N Passing = 6,314 N Passing = 312 N Passing = 53 N Passing = 188 N Passing = 2,964 N Passing = 201 N Passing = 26 N Passing = 1,044Membership= 111,004 Membership= 16,803 Membership= 1,256 Membership=142 Membership= 2,152 Membership= 6,661 Membership= 393 Membership= 54 Membership= 2,708

2006-07 N Passing = 74,999 N Passing = 5,927 N Passing = 263 N Passing = 58 N Passing = 164 N Passing = 2,624 N Passing = 185 N Passing = 22 N Passing = 1,058Membership= 111,030 Membership= 15,285 Membership= 966 Membership=141 Membership= 1,872 Membership= 5,905 Membership= 348 Membership= 51 Membership= 2,673

Notes: 1Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Prior to 2003-04, no scores were reported when membership was fewer than thirty students. Beginning in 2003-04, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. The vertical lines between the years in the legend indicates that the edition of the tests changed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

115

Figure 27. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 to 2007-08), by School Year,Performance of Students with Disabilities, by Classification

8th Graders Taking the General Performance1 Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (1996-97 to 2004-05), by School Year, and73

.6

45.7

38.8

58.9

16.8

51.2

48.3

45.9 50

.9

79.3

51.2

39.6

61.5

20.9

58.8

61.2 65

.5

59.3

84.0

63.0

52.9

74.6

30.6

68.5

66.0

63.6

64.8

80.0

59.3

46.7

75.9

24.7

66.0

56.5

68.6

62.3

75.8

48.8

38.0

56.8

19.3

54.3 59

.6

40.4 43.4

81.5

57.6

44.7

70.2

26.0

64.5 67.7

69.7

61.4

84.2

61.8

50.2

71.7

28.9

69.0

68.8 71.7

64.7

84.7

63.8

51.6

67.9

31.0

70.6

67.0 73

.2

68.4

85.7

66.3

53.8 62

.2

35.3

72.5

67.0 71

.4

68.9

37.6

64.5

24.8

37.3

8.7

44.5 51

.1

48.1

38.6

67.5

38.8

27.2

41.1

39.643.153

.2

44.4

8.8

0102030405060708090

100

State Students withDisabilities

BED HI EMD SLD SLI VI OHI

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

BED - Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled HI - Hearing Impaired EMD - Educable Mentally Disabled SLD - Specific Learning Disabled SLI - Speech-Language Impaired VI - Visually Impaired OHI - Other Health Impaired


1996-97 N Passing = 65,432 N Passing = 4,007 N Passing =21 N Passing = * N Passing = 56 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 185

Membership= 88,846 Membership= 8,768 Membership=44 Membership=22 Membership= 98 Membership= * Membership= * Membership= * Membership= 313

1997-98 N Passing = 84,055 N Passing = 6,077 N Passing =32 N Passing = * N Passing = 86 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 211

Membership=106,059 Membership=11,861 Membership=60 Membership=19 Membership=152 Membership= * Membership= * Membership= * Membership= 260

1998-99 N Passing = 80,168 N Passing = 6,963 N Passing =25 N Passing = * N Passing =120 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 642

Membership= 95,479 Membership=11,054 Membership=38 Membership=23 Membership=168 Membership= * Membership= * Membership= * Membership= 823

1999-00 N Passing = 76,168 N Passing = 6,264 N Passing =18 N Passing = * N Passing =146 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 163

Membership= 95,163 Membership=10,570 Membership=36 Membership=28 Membership=236 Membership= * Membership= * Membership= * Membership= 223

2000-01 N Passing = 75,362 N Passing = 6,462 N Passing =13 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing =20 N Passing = 737 N Passing = 710

Membership= 99,480 Membership=13,254 Membership=36 Membership=13 Membership= * Membership= * Membership=40 Membership=1,369 Membership=1,054

2001-02 N Passing = 77,035 N Passing = 7,664 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing =28 N Passing = 890 N Passing = 900

Membership= 94,533 Membership=13,297 Membership=28 Membership=23 Membership= * Membership= * Membership=48 Membership=1,403 Membership=1,187

2002-03 N Passing = 89,432 N Passing = 9,475 N Passing =29 N Passing =20 N Passing = * N Passing = 73 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing =1,191

Membership=106,201 Membership=15,325 Membership=55 Membership=44 Membership= * Membership=106 Membership=15 Membership= 28 Membership=1,448

2003-04 N Passing = 92,009 N Passing = 9,686 N Passing =47 N Passing =27 N Passing = * N Passing = 64 N Passing = 3 N Passing = 3 N Passing =1,432

Membership=108,609 Membership=15,172 Membership=68 Membership=51 Membership= * Membership=114 Membership=12 Membership= 24 Membership=1,723

2004-05 N Passing = 94,066 N Passing =10,375 N Passing =30 N Passing =22 N Passing = * N Passing =598 N Passing = 4 N Passing = 16 N Passing =1,677

Membership=109,741 Membership=15,647 Membership=43 Membership=41 Membership= * Membership=885 Membership=16 Membership= 42 Membership= 2,000

2005-06 N Passing = 71,584 N Passing = 6,314 N Passing =32 N Passing = 19 N Passing = * N Passing = 124 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,342

Membership= 111,004 Membership= 16,803 Membership=69 Membership= 50 Membership= * Membership= 498 Membership=154 Membership= 322 Membership= 2,277

2006-07 N Passing = 74,999 N Passing = 5,927 N Passing =38 N Passing = 10 N Passing = * N Passing = 136 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,231

Membership= 111,030 Membership= 15,285 Membership=87 Membership= 46 Membership= * Membership= 479 Membership= 51 Membership=144 Membership= 308 Membership= 2,060

Notes: 1Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected.

*Prior to 2003-04, no scores were reported when membership was fewer than thirty students; student performance for the severely/profoundly mentally disabled and deaf/blind categories were not included for this reason. Beginning in 2003-04, performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed."Membership" and "N Passing" totals for "Students with Disabilities" data include all students with performance answer sheets coded as having a disability, including Section 504. Prior to 2000-01, data for autistic, severely/profoundly mentally disabled, multihandicapped, deaf/blind, and trainable mentally disabled were combined under the "Other Exceptional Classification (OEC). OEC is no longer reported as a category starting in 2000-01. All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 throug 2004-05 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. The vertical lines between years in the legend indicates that the edition of the tests changed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Figure 27. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

OI - Orthopedically Impaired TBI - Traumatic Brain Injured OEC - Other Exceptional Classification A - Autistic S/PMD - Severely\Profoundly Mentally Disabled MH - Multihandicapped TMD - Trainable Mentally Disabled Section 504

116

8th Graders Taking the General Performance1 Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (1996-97 to 2004-05), by School Year, and8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 to 2007-08), by School Year,

Performance of Students with Disabilities, by Classification (continued)

73.6

45.7

47.7 57

.1

59.1

79.3

51.2

53.3 56.6

81.284.0

63.0 65.8 71

.4 78.0

80.0

59.3

50.0

73.175.8

48.8

50.0 53

.8

67.4

81.5

57.6

58.3 63

.4 75.884

.2

61.8

52.7

45.5

68.9

0.0

82.3

84.7

63.8 69

.1

52.9 56.1

25.0

12.5

83.185.7

66.3 69.8

53.7

67.6

25.0

38.1

83.9

58.967

.5

21.7

61.9

36.1

*

46.4

37.6

*

24.9

38.0

64.5

59.8

28.4

43.7

*

38.8

*0 00

102030405060708090

100


OI TBI OEC A S/PMD MH TMD Section 504

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

*


2007-08 N Passing = 78,778 N Passing = 6,266 N Passing = 186 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 333 N Passing = 65 N Passing = 205 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 2,617

Membership= 112,824 Membership= 16,191 Membership= 621 Membership= 1 Membership= 0 Membership= 1,054 Membership= 151 Membership= 1,909 Membership= 355 Membership= 56 Membership= 6,163

2007-08 N Passing = 78,778 N Passing = 6,266 N Passing = * N Passing = 29 N Passing = 122 N Passing = 13 N Passing = 20 N Passing = 1,454

Membership= 112,824 Membership= 16,191 Membership= 153 Membership= 57 Membership= 236 Membership= 37 Membership= 48 Membership= 2,234

Notes: 1Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected.

*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.

"Membership" and "N Passing" totals for "Students with Disabilities" data include all students with performance answer sheets coded as having a disability, including Section 504.

All data use "Membership" as the denominator.

Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum.

The vertical lines between years in the legend indicates that the edition of the tests changed.

Disability categories were revised to reflect those in the 2007-08 authoritative source for students with disabilities (CECAS).

Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report.


117

8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time, 2007-08Figure 27. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Performance of Students with Disabilities, by Classification (continued)

AU-Autism DB-Deaf-Blindness DF-Deafness ED-Serious Emotional Disability HI-Hearing Impairment IDMI-Intellectual Disability-Mild IDMO-Intellectual Disability-Moderate IDSE-Intellectual Disability-Severe

LD-Specific Learning Disability MU-Multiple Disabilities OH-Other Health Impairment OI-Orthopedic Impairment SI-Speech/Language Impairment TB-Traumatic Brain Injury Section 504

N Passing = 1,214

Membership= 3,116

69.8

38.730.0 31.6

43.0 42.5

<=5.0%****

10.7<=5.0%

010

2030

405060

7080

90100


AU DB DF ED HI IDMI IDMO IDSE LD

69.8

38.7

51.7

35.1

<=5.0%

65.1

41.739.050.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


MU OH OI SI TB VI sec504


Figure 28. North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the Performance Test* of Computer Skills for the First Time (1996-97 to 2004-05), by School Year, and

8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time (2005-06 to 2007-08), by School Year,Performance of Limited English Proficient Students

1996-97 N Passing = 65,432 N Passing = 251Membership = 88,846 Membership = 632

1997-98 N Passing = 84,055 N Passing = 199Membership = 106,059 Membership = 351

1998-99 N Passing = 80,168 N Passing = 594Membership = 95,479 Membership = 1,018

1999-00 N Passing = 76,168 N Passing = 1,148Membership = 95,163 Membership = 2,105









Notes: *Only performance data, not multiple-choice data, are centrally collected.All data use "Membership" as the denominator.Students who began grade 8 in 1996-97 through 1999-00 were tested on the 1992 computer skills curriculum; students who began grade 8 in 2000-01 through 2004 were tested on the 1998 computer skills curriculum. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum.The vertical lines between years in the legend indicates that the edition of the test changed.Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section

73.6

39.7

79.3

56.7

84.0

58.3

80.0

54.5

75.8

49.0

81.5

54.2

84.2

58.3

84.7

59.8

85.7

62.164.5

27.7

67.5

29.9

69.8

37.1

0102030405060708090

100

State Limited English Proficient

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-062006-07 2007-08

118


Table 24. 2006-07 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time,

Characteristics and Performance2006-07 2007-08

Member-ship

Number Percent Member-ship

Number PercentPassing Proficient Passing Proficient

Grade 8 - All Students 111,030 74,999 67.5 112,824 78,778 69.8GenderFemale 54,261 39,006 71.9 54,974 40,627 73.9Male 56,769 35,993 63.4 57,850 38,151 65.9Not Coded 0 * * 0 * *Ethnic GroupAmerican Indian 1,573 864 54.9 1,641 919 56.0Asian 2,341 1,842 78.7 2,588 2,061 79.6Black 33,362 15,924 47.7 33,316 17,172 51.5Hispanic 8,746 4,346 49.7 10,086 5,422 53.8Multi-Racial 2,790 1,982 71.0 3,214 2,359 73.4White 62,218 50,041 80.4 61,979 50,845 82.0Not Coded 0 * * 0 * *Parental EducationDid not finish high school Data Not Available Data Not AvailableHigh school or GED Some education after high school but did not graduate Community, technical or junior college Trade or business schoolFour-year college degreeGraduate degreeNot CodedHours of Homework Using the Computer (per week)None assigned 17,494 9,801 56.0 16,845 9,630 57.2Less than 1 hour 31,056 21,267 68.5 31,184 22,401 71.8Between 1-3 hours 27,884 19,392 69.5 28,696 21,255 74.1More than 3 hours, less than 5 hours 8,785 6,023 68.6 9,024 6,726 74.5Between 5-10 hours 3,523 2,516 71.4 3,615 2,773 76.7More than 10 hours 1,741 1,045 60.0 1,726 1,150 66.6Assigned but not done 1,543 522 33.8 1,417 482 34.0Not Coded 18,990 14,432 76.0 20,317 14,361 70.7Where Computer Skills are LearnedAt home 68,807 49,633 72.1 69,791 53,382 76.5At a friend's 41,230 28,828 69.9 40,293 30,717 76.2In computer class 84,879 56,236 66.3 84,206 59,659 70.8In regular classes 57,787 40,688 70.4 59,040 44,292 75.0Out of class 2,682 1,518 56.6 2,708 1,576 58.2Computer camp 9,720 5,637 58.0 10,004 6,215 62.1Other 34,254 22,733 66.4 34,391 24,835 72.2Location of Regular Computer AccessIn class 62,224 42,154 67.7 59,240 43,467 73.4In computer lab 86,871 57,981 66.7 87,460 62,263 71.2In media center/library 77,465 52,563 67.9 77,748 56,840 73.1Other 26,484 17,140 64.7 26,530 18,744 70.7Not Coded 20,011 14,723 73.6 20,712 14,511 70.1Years Attended North Carolina SchoolsFirst year 4,006 2,237 55.8 4,094 2,201 53.8Between 1-2 6,713 3,711 55.3 7,323 4,147 56.63 or more 81,450 54,687 67.1 81,277 58,127 71.5Not Coded 18,861 14,364 76.2 20,130 14,303 71.1Computer Access Outside of ClassNo 10,003 3,870 38.7 9,526 3,433 36.0On occasion 21,626 11,997 55.5 20,865 12,291 58.9All the time 60,432 44,715 74.0 62,125 48,708 78.4Not Coded 18,969 14,417 76.0 20,308 14,346 70.6Opportunity to Use Computer to Present InformationNever 5,138 2,300 44.8 4,619 1,988 43.0Sometimes 51,324 31,936 62.2 51,210 33,344 65.1Often 35,599 26,350 74.0 36,720 29,108 79.3Not Coded 18,969 14,413 76.0 20,275 14,338 70.7

Notes: All data use "Membership" as the denominator. Students who began grade 8 in 2005-06 and beyond were tested on the 2004 computer skills curriculum. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

119


2006-07 2007-08 Number Percent Number Percent

Category Membership Passing Proficient Membership Passing Proficient Grade 8 - All Students 111,030 74,999 67.5 112,824 78,778 69.8

Assistive Technology/Devices 169 19 11.2 164 38 23.2 Dictation to Scribe 68 21 30.9 58 21 36.2 Interpreter/Transliterator Signs/Cues Test1 25 6 24.0 45 11 24.4 Magnification Devices 25 12 48.0 43 18 41.9 Test Administrator Reads Test Aloud (in English)1 7,306 2,092 28.6 6,427 1,935 30.1 Typewriter/Word Processor 19 16 84.2 12 6 50.0 Hospital/Home Testing 6 3 50.0 1 * * Multiple Testing Sessions 3,059 973 31.8 2,821 906 32.1 Scheduled Extended Time 12,608 4,371 34.7 12,187 4,409 36.2 Testing in a Separate Room 9,154 2,939 32.1 8,891 2,950 33.2 English/Native Language Dictionary/Electronic Translator 1,193 223 18.7 1,357 324 23.9 Student Reads Aloud to Self 0 ** ** 17 4 23.5 Accommodation Notification Form 18 10 55.6 0 ** **

Notes: **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. 1Use of the "Interpreter/Transliterator Signs/Cues Test" and "Test Administrator Reads Test Aloud (in English)" accommodations during the administration of state tests that measure reading comprehension skills invalidates the results of the test. Accommodations are available for students with disabilities or limited English proficiency. All data use "memberhsip" as the denominator. All data are rounded to the nearest tenth, therefore, accommodation categories may not sum to 100.0 percent. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Program.

Table 25. 2006-07 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time,

Accommodations

120


2006-07 2007-08Number of Number Percent Number of Number Percent

Course Category Respondents Passing Proficient Respondents Passing ProficientMathematics Spreadsheet 53,247 37,271 70.0 51,226 37,190 72.6

Database 33,628 22,880 68.0 31,462 22,373 71.1Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 21,222 14,883 70.1 21,921 15,708 71.7Telecommunications 7,640 5,065 66.3 7,884 5,349 67.8Multimedia 16,412 11,108 67.7 18,577 13,413 72.2

Science Spreadsheet 27,278 18,307 67.1 26,343 18,259 69.3Database 25,773 17,724 68.8 24,852 17,536 70.6Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 32,424 23,942 73.8 32,177 25,461 79.1Telecommunications 9,046 5,869 64.9 9,482 6,499 68.5Multimedia 21,182 16,180 76.4 24,993 20,509 82.1

Social Spreadsheet 20,998 13,599 64.8 21,382 13,944 65.2Science Database 20,769 14,660 70.6 21,216 15,295 72.1

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 38,111 28,358 74.4 38,189 30,255 79.2Telecommunications 8,617 5,874 68.2 9,152 6,507 71.1Multimedia 20,063 15,423 76.9 24,493 20,122 82.2

Language Spreadsheet 18,577 11,058 59.5 18,279 11,011 60.2Arts Database 15,547 9,983 64.2 14,699 9,829 66.9


Business Spreadsheet 33,093 22,077 66.7 33,784 24,534 72.6Education Database 29,623 20,079 67.8 29,792 22,087 74.1


Other Spreadsheet 32,025 21,224 66.3 30,501 21,937 71.9Database 26,926 18,251 67.8 25,426 18,858 74.2Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 35,597 25,865 72.7 34,898 27,288 78.2Telecommunications 16,675 11,563 69.3 16,313 12,256 75.1Multimedia 27,424 19,887 72.5 29,583 23,350 78.9

Notes: All data use "Number of Respondents" as the denominator. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Table 26. 2006-07 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Graders Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time,

Computer Skills Learned in Each Subject Area

121


2006-07 2007-08

CourseNumber of

RespondentsNumber Passing

Percent Proficient

Number of Respondents

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

Mathematics Spreadsheet 6,475 2,734 42.2 6,220 2,590 41.6Database 4,245 1,799 42.4 3,973 1,677 42.2Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 2,600 1,059 40.7 2,631 1,049 39.9Telecommunications 1,102 425 38.6 1,098 410 37.3Multimedia 2,191 834 38.1 2,248 896 39.9

Science Spreadsheet 3,669 1,454 39.6 3,636 1,386 38.1Database 3,310 1,393 42.1 3,232 1,351 41.8Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 3,610 1,677 46.5 3,305 1,658 50.2Telecommunications 1,353 524 38.7 1,456 570 39.1Multimedia 2,198 1,087 49.5 2,429 1,327 54.6

Social Spreadsheet 3,066 1,134 37.0 3,243 1,146 35.3Science Database 2,709 1,189 43.9 2,735 1,181 43.2

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 4,167 2,031 48.7 3,932 1,971 50.1Telecommunications 1,236 532 43.0 1,304 542 41.6Multimedia 2,081 1,008 48.4 2,260 1,226 54.2

Language Spreadsheet 2,846 930 32.7 2,906 904 31.1Arts Database 2,088 753 36.1 1,999 716 35.8

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 6,175 3,019 48.9 5,808 3,010 51.8Telecommunications 1,310 538 41.1 1,263 527 41.7Multimedia 2,081 992 47.7 2,156 1,152 53.4

Business Spreadsheet 4,350 1,789 41.1 4,090 1,820 44.5Education Database 3,884 1,647 42.4 3,520 1,653 47.0


Other Spreadsheet 4,001 1,574 39.3 3,722 1,591 42.7Database 3,256 1,358 41.7 3,017 1,414 46.9Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 3,845 1,765 45.9 3,519 1,784 50.7Telecommunications 2,095 905 43.2 1,847 870 47.1Multimedia 2,972 1,376 46.3 2,851 1,500 52.6

Notes: All data use "Number of Respondents" as the denominator. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report.Prepared by NCPDI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Category

Table 27. 2006-07 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills 8th Grade Students with Disabilities (including Section 504 Students) Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time,


122


2006-07 2007-08

CourseNumber of

RespondentsNumber Passing

Percent Proficient

Number of Respondents

Number Passing

Percent Proficient

Mathematics Spreadsheet 2,003 661 33.0 2,291 933 40.7Database 1,303 434 33.3 1,406 561 39.9Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 791 251 31.7 943 334 35.4Telecommunications 290 76 26.2 372 116 31.2Multimedia 609 176 28.9 788 286 36.3

Science Spreadsheet 1,123 316 28.1 1,312 416 31.7Database 1,041 328 31.5 1,180 427 36.2Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 1,151 386 33.5 1,276 542 42.5Telecommunications 444 122 27.5 495 158 31.9Multimedia 599 202 33.7 804 369 45.9

Social Spreadsheet 937 247 26.4 1,163 311 26.7Science Database 790 267 33.8 899 336 37.4

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 1,329 491 36.9 1,454 634 43.6Telecommunications 391 109 27.9 448 148 33.0Multimedia 543 212 39.0 725 336 46.3

Language Spreadsheet 982 214 21.8 1,136 288 25.4Arts Database 669 178 26.6 785 271 34.5

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 1,866 687 36.8 2,149 1,009 47.0Telecommunications 447 138 30.9 458 158 34.5Multimedia 621 197 31.7 791 367 46.4

Business Spreadsheet 1,125 370 32.9 1,386 592 42.7Education Database 1,021 335 32.8 1,230 534 43.4

Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 975 334 34.3 1,209 556 46.0Telecommunications 645 200 31.0 701 316 45.1Multimedia 649 227 35.0 876 419 47.8

Other Spreadsheet 1,286 394 30.6 1,320 549 41.6Database 1,009 332 32.9 1,047 444 42.4Word Processing/Desktop Publishing 1,142 423 37.0 1,317 611 46.4Telecommunications 608 203 33.4 663 252 38.0Multimedia 919 334 36.3 1,057 521 49.3

Notes: All data use "Number of Respondents" as the denominator. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after September 15, 2008 are not included in this report.Prepared by NCPDI Division of Accountability Services/Test Development Section.

Category

Table 28. 2006-07 to 2007-08 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills8th Grade Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students Taking the Online Test of Computer Skills for the First Time,


123

124


Sample Questionsfor the

North Carolina Testsof Computer Skills

125

126


127

Sample Test Questions for Edition 1 Computer Skills Tests* Multiple-Choice Test This test consists of 70 questions that ask you about the use of computers in society, hardware and software components, keyboarding, and how to use specific software applications—word processing, database, spreadsheet, and telecomputing. Directions: To answer a question, first decide which is the best answer choice for a particular question. Then, find the question number on your answer grid (below) and make a mark in the circle containing the letter of the correct answer. Remember to mark only one answer for each question.

8 DCBA

7 DCBA

6 DCBA

5 DCBA

4 DCBA

3 DCBA

2 DCBA

DCBA1

Performance Test This test consists of four parts—Keyboarding Techniques, Word Processing/Editing, Database Use, and Spreadsheet Use—that assess how well you can use software to perform specific functions. (The sample performance questions in this handbook, as well as the electronic files, are located on the Internet at www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/index.html.** These will provide you with a chance to practice the questions using actual keyboarding, word processing/editing, database, and spreadsheet files. If you need help, talk to your teacher.) Directions: Read the directions at the beginning of each part. Then complete the task or questions. Either you or the teacher giving the test must print out your work for Keyboarding Techniques and Word Processing/Editing. For the Database Use and Spreadsheet Use parts you should mark your answers in the space provided next to each question. * This section is an excerpt from the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Student Handbook (September 2000). **The electronic files for state computer skills performance tests on the Internet are available in the software packages (PC and Macintosh platforms) that are supported by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.

128

Edition 1 Computer Skills Multiple-Choice Test 1. Doing research by using an online database

instead of a printed set of similar information offers which advantage?

A more current information B better charts C easier to understand tables D more legible diagrams

2. Upon walking into Mr. Johnson's workroom, Daryl saw a test that would be given the next day on the computer screen. Which of the following can Daryl ethically do?

A Correct obvious errors on the test to help

Mr. Johnson avoid embarrassment. B Read the questions as a study guide. C Add a few well-chosen questions that Mr.

Johnson left out. D Leave the room without reading the test

questions.

3. What is the function of a disk drive?

A to print sheets of paper B to read from or write information to a

floppy disk C to display information or pictures on a

screen D to calculate numbers

4. For a social studies report, Fred needs to illustrate the products of North Carolina with pictures and comparison graphs. He would most likely use which software programs?

A spreadsheet and statistical B spreadsheet and database C graphing and clip art D clip art and drawing

5. For correct keyboarding, what is the recommended placement of fingers on the home row keys?

A fingers of the left hand on A-S-D-F and

fingers on the right hand on J-K-L-; B fingers of the right hand on A-S-D-F and

fingers on the left hand on J-K-L-; C fingers of the left hand on A-S-E-F and

fingers on the right hand on J-K-O-P D fingers of the left hand on Q-W-E-R and

fingers on the right hand on U-I-O-P

129

6. Jim is typing a song on his word processor. The song has four verses, and the chorus is repeated after each verse. What would be the most efficient way to enter the song, making sure the chorus is repeated after each verse?

A Type the chorus four times. B Copy the chorus on a copy machine and

then cut and paste it into the document. C Use the Copy and Paste Commands on the

word processor. D Highlight the text and change it to Bold.

7. Which is not an advantage of using computerized spreadsheets?

A speed of calculation B flexibility of moving entries C cost of initial set-up D ability to generate tables

8. Using an electronic bulletin board, Andy can do all of the following except which one?

A send private messages to a friend B send a public message to friends interested

in one topic C send pictures to a friend D send a package to a friend

130

Edition 1 Computer Skills Performance Test Part I: Keyboarding Techniques

Directions: 1. Key, as accurately as possible, the title and paragraphs

below. Remember to use correct keyboarding techniques. Note: Do not worry about any differences in word wrap between what you type and how the paragraphs appear on this page.

2. When you have finished keying the title and paragraphs,

print your work.

OUR WEEKLY ASSEMBLY MEETING

Every Wednesday morning the students at Smith Middle School meet in the auditorium for assembly. The program may include speakers, musicians, plays, or movies. Most of the students like assembly because we never know what to expect. Sometimes at the end of the program, the principal tells us about special upcoming events. Every spring my math club makes a presentation. Last spring I explained how a computer does math.

131

Edition 1 Computer Skills Performance Test Part II: Word Processing/Editing

Directions: 1. Edit the title and paragraph below. You may use the

"Edit Symbol Reference Table" provided below if you need assistance.

2. When you have finished editing the title and paragraph, print your work.

center

indent

insert

move

spell out

capitalize

lower case

delete

replace word

insert spacenew paragraph

Edit Symbol Reference Table

132

Edition 1 Computer Skills Performance Test Part III: Database Use

Directions: Use your database program and the file called MAGAZDB.

1. Read the scenario. 2. Use the database file to respond to the questions below. 3. When asked to “describe the steps you took to find your

answer,” use appropriate database terms. For example, “Sorted Ad Cost per pg in descending order” or “Searched the Ad Cost per pg for all records greater than 1,000.”

Scenario:

Your school is selling magazines to raise money for class trips. Using the database MAGAZDB, your job is to answer questions asked by your classmates who are selling the magazines and other classmates who are handling records of sales.

Sample Record from MAGAZDB Database.* TITLE: American Health CITY PUBLISHED: New York STATE PUBLISHED: New York PUBLISHED BY: Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. TYPE OF MAG: Health #PUB PER YEAR: 10 AD COST PER PG: $34,500 AD COST BCK COV: $44.800 COST PER COPY: $1.95

1. What is the name of the magazine that has the largest circulation?

2. What is the name of the magazine published 6 times per year (# PUB PER YEAR) that has an advertisement cost per page (AD COST PER PG) of $4,045?

Explanation: Use database terms to describe the steps you took to find your answer. ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

*NOTE: This example does not contain all fields of the database. It is not representative of a complete record.

133

Edition 1 Computer Skills Performance Test Part IV: Spreadsheet Use

Directions: Use your spreadsheet program and the file called SSDRYCL. 1. Read the scenario. 2. Use the spreadsheet file to respond to the questions below.

Scenario:

The owners of a new dry cleaning business have pledged to donate 1% of their profit to purchase books for the library at your school. Your Computer Skills class has created the spreadsheet SSDRYCL to help the owners keep accurate records. On assignment at the dry cleaner’s, you test the spreadsheet in the following situations.

NOTE: The spreadsheet automatically calculates 6% tax. Excerpt from SSDRYCL Spreadsheet

Amount of money available to spend: $0.00 Cost of Cost of Specific Number of Cost Per Specific Item Plus Items Item Items Tax Shirts: 0 $1.55 $0.00 $0.00 Blouses: 0 $1.60 $0.00 $0.00 Men’s Suits: 0 $5.50 $0.00 $0.00 Women’s Suits: 0 $5.25 $0.00 $0.00 Sweaters: 0 $2.75 $0.00 $0.00 Overcoats: 0 $8.25 $0.00 $0.00 Total Cost of Dry Cleaning: $0.00 Amount of money Remaining: $0.00

1. Franco has $25.00 to pay for cleaning two sweaters and two overcoats. How much change should he get back?

2. Colleen paid $8.48 for having a number of blouses cleaned.

How many blouses did she have cleaned in all?

134

Answers to Sample Questions and Notes

Edition 1 Multiple-Choice Test Edition 1 Performance Test 1. The correct answer is A. This question

measures how well you understand how computers are used as a tool for accessing information.

2. The correct answer is D. This question measures how well you understand the ethical use of computers and respect the computer-generated work of others.

3. The correct answer is B. This question measures your understanding of the components of a computer—hardware and software. You may also be asked about other physical components of a computer, their function, and use.

4. The correct answer is C. This question measures your knowledge of the use of software in various subjects to solve problems. You may also be asked about other types of software, e.g., probeware used in science, database programs used in social studies.

5. The correct answer is A. This question measures your knowledge of correct keyboarding skills and finger placement on the home row keys.

6. The correct answer is C. This question measures your ability to use the Copy and Paste functions while word processing. You may also be asked about other functions (e.g., Move, Print) and utilities (e.g., spell checker, grammar checker), and about producing desktop published documents.

7. The correct answer is C. This question measures your understanding of the advantages (or disadvantages) of using a computerized spreadsheet versus a printed spreadsheet. You may also be asked to use a spreadsheet to test simple "What if" statements.

8. The correct answer is D. This question measures your understanding of how an electronic bulletin board works.

Part I: Keyboarding Techniques. This task is scored for typing accuracy, spacing, and length. Part II: Word Processing/Editing. This task is scored for the number of correct edits and if other errors are made while editing. Part III: Database Use. 1. The correct answer is “Reader’s Digest.” This question measures your ability to sort a database. 2. The correct answer is “American Scientist.” Your answer is also scored for how well you

explain how you determined your answer to the question (“I searched the field # PUB

PER YEAR=6 and searched the field AD COST PER YEAR=$4,045). This question measures your ability to search a database using more than one criterion to solve a problem.

Part IV: Spreadsheet Use. 1. The correct answer is $1.68. This question measures your ability to use a spreadsheet to test simple “What if” statements. 2. The correct answer is 5. This question also measures your ability to use a spreadsheet to test simple “What if” statements.

135

Sample Test Questions for Edition 2 Computer Skills Tests Multiple-Choice Test This test consists of 70 questions that ask you about the use of computers in society, hardware and software components, keyboarding, and how to use specific software applications—word processing, database, spreadsheet, and telecommunications.

Directions: To answer a question, first decide which is the best answer choice for a particular question. Then, find the question number on your answer grid (below) and make a mark in the circle containing the letter of the correct answer. Remember to mark only one answer for each question.

Performance Test This test consists of three parts—Desktop Publishing, Database Use, and Spreadsheet Use—that assess how well you can use software to perform specific functions. (By going to www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/computerskills/handbook, you can practice the same sample performance questions in this handbook on the Internet using actual electronic files.* If you need help, talk to your teacher.)

Directions: Read the directions at the beginning of each part. Then complete the task or questions. Either you or the teacher giving the test must print out some of your work for Desktop Publishing, Database Use, and Spreadsheet Use. You will also mark your answers in the space provided next to several questions in the Database Use and Spreadsheet Use parts of the test.

*The electronic files for state computer skills performance tests on the Internet are available in the software packages (PC and Macintosh platforms) that are supported by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.

DCBA1

DCBA2

DCBA3

DCBA4

DCBA5

DCBA6

DCBA7

DCBA8

DCBA9

136

Edition 2 Computer Skills Multiple-Choice Test 1. Trish is editing the last paragraph of her

essay. She has decided to add another sentence before the last sentence. Which of the following would be the most efficient process?

A Type the sentence in another

document and then place it in her essay where she wants it.

B Type the sentence at the end of her

essay and then move it to where she wants it.

C Type the sentence at the end of her

essay, copy the new sentence, and then paste it where she wants it.

D Put the cursor at the point where she

wants to add the sentence and then type the sentence.

2. Which search of an electronic phone

directory would find only the Doe families living on Main Street in area code 919?

A Name = “Doe” or Address = “Main

Street” or Area Code = “919” B Name = “Doe” and Address = “Main

Street” or Area Code = “919” C Name = “Doe” or Address = “Main

Street” and Area Code = “919” D Name = “Doe” and Address = “Main

Street” and Area Code = “919”

3. Using the table below, what is the result in Cell C6?

�

��

�

�

� � �

�

�

�

��

�

�

A 80 B 71 C 59 D 57 4. What does rsmith represent in [email protected]?

A domain B host C user’s name D address

137

5. Why is a web site an effective way to present

a report on an animal that you are studying?

A People like to read reports on computers.

B People can follow links to additional

information, pictures, or animal sounds.

C People do not have to read the report;

they can just look at the pictures and listen to the sounds.

D People can read a long report on one

page by scrolling down so they do not have to go to another web page.

6. When is a storyboard most helpful?

A at the end of a project to be sure the product is complete

B at the end of a project to be sure the

product is linear C during the project planning to be sure

the product works D in the middle of a project to be sure the

product works

7. Which method is used to cite resource materials in multimedia projects?

A bibliography of print resources B bibliography of three main sources

C bibliography of online resources

only D bibliography of all resources 8. Jane’s multimedia project group uses a

picture from an electronic encyclopedia. Which of the following must Jane’s group do?

A Use the encyclopedia picture freely.

B Cite the source for the picture.

C Credit the group members for scanning the picture.

D List the names of the group members at

the end of the project.

9. Who of the following owns the artwork

created in a school computer lab using commercial software?

A the student artist B the school principal C the school superintendent D the software developer

138

Edition 2 Computer Skills Performance Test Part I: Desktop Publishing Directions: 1. Use your word processing program and the file called WPFILE. 2. Read the scenario. 3. Use the word processing file to respond to the five tasks below. 4. When you have finished, print your work. Scenario: Your assignment is to edit and format a student newsletter for your school. Following the instructions below, edit and format the word processing file called WPFILE. Sample of WPFILE file The Social Studies TV Project Update May 2000 Volume 4, #3 The Big Four Became the Big Three We are all familiar with the ABC, CBS, and NBC networks, but

a fourth “major” network helped turn television from a novelty enjoyed

mainly by scientists and a few owners of sets in New York City into a

popular entertainment medium enjoyed by millions of viewers across

the nation.

TV Study to Be Televised The members of Ms. Roberta Romano’s eighth-grade social studies class hope their schoolmates and friends will watch the six o’clock evening news on WRAM-TV next Friday. Earlier in the afternoon, newscaster Warren Leonard will visit the class to interview students while preparing The Social Effects of Television in 1958 to send to the printers. The 96-page pamphlet will include statistics the students prodused during their 16-week study of the influence of television programming on American society in 1958.

139

1. Center the newsletter title, The Social Studies TV Project Update, in bold 24-point type. 2. In the first article, The Big Four Became the Big Three, make the following edits: • Center the title in bold 14-point type • Single space and left-align the text in regular 12-point type • Indent the paragraph 3. In the second article, TV Study to Be Televised, italicize the title, The Social Effects of

Television in 1958. 4. Use the spell checker to make certain all words are spelled correctly. 5. Below the last article, key in the following article: Paying for Noticeable Names. Remember to: • Key as accurately as possible the title and paragraph in the box below • Center and format the title in bold 14-point type

• Indent the paragraph • Left-align the text in 12-point type • Use correct keyboarding techniques

• Use word wrap and ignore any differences between what you key and how the paragraph appears on this page

• Use the spell checker

Paying for Noticeable Names

During the 1958 television season, advertisers were careful to get full value for their investments by putting the names of their companies in the titles of programs such as Lux Playhouse, The Dinah Shore Chevy Show, and Lawrence Welk’s Plymouth Show.

140

Edition 2 Computer Skills Performance Test Part II: Database Use Directions: 1. Use your database program and the files called DBFILE and DBSHORT. 2. Read the scenario. 3. Use the database file called DBFILE to respond to questions 1 and 2 below. 4. Use the database file called DBSHORT to respond to question 3 below. 5. When asked to “describe the steps you took to find your answer,” use appropriate

database terms (for example, “Sorted the MONTHS EXISTED field in ascending order” or “Searched the MONTHS EXISTED field for all records greater than 200”).

Scenario: Your social studies class has created a database containing information on the 106 network television shows shown during the evenings in the fall of 1958, the first year that all major networks had a full evening schedule. The database DBFILE is complete through December 1998, and your task is to answer the following questions.

Sample Record from DBFILE database (incomplete) PROGRAM: Alfred Hitchcock Presents BROADCAST DAY: Sunday NETWORK: CBS TIME STARTED: 9:30 TIME ENDED: 10:00 MINUTES LONG: 30 GENRE: Suspense Anthology LEAD PERFORMER: Alfred Hitchcock __________________ 1. Which program lasted for the greatest number of YEARS ON TV? _______________ 2. Which program had a MONTHS EXISTED number greater than 150 months and a YEARS ON TV number less than 5?

Explanation: Use database terms to describe the steps you took to find your answer for question 2.

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

141

PROGRAM NETWORK GENRE LEAD

Bat Masterson NBC Western Gene Barry Ed Sullivan Show CBS Variety Ed Sullivan Leave It To Beaver ABC Situation Comedy Barbara Billingsley This is Music ABC Music Colin Male 3. Close the database file called DBFILE. Next open the database file called DBSHORT.

Follow the instructions below: • Add a new field named BROADCAST DAY (the new field may be added before or

after any pre-existing field) • In the new field named BROADCAST DAY, enter the following day for each

program: • Wednesday (for Bat Masterson) • Sunday (for the Ed Sullivan Show) • Thursday (for Leave it to Beaver) • Monday (for This is Music) Print your final DBSHORT file.

142

Edition 2 Computer Skills Performance Test Part III: Spreadsheet Use Directions: 1. Use your spreadsheet program and the file called SSFILE. 2. Read the scenario. 3. Use the spreadsheet file to respond to questions 1 - 4 below. Scenario: Your social studies class is studying advertising on television in 1958. Your teacher has created a spreadsheet to estimate the number of viewers in the neighborhood around your school who would have seen advertisements for nine programs that were popular in 1958. Your assignment is to test the spreadsheet by answering the five questions below. After answering these questions, your teacher wants you to add new information to the file, SSFILE, and create a chart (graph) for presentation to your social studies class.

Program Weeks Ad Ran Rating Weekly Viewers Times Ad Viewed Gunsmoke 0 40 208 0Wagon Train 0 36 187 0Have Gun Will Travel 0 34 177 0The Danny Thomas Show 0 32 166 0Maverick 0 30 156 0The Price Is Right 0 30 156 0Wanted: Dead or Alive 0 28 146 0The Perry Como Show 0 27 140 0Sugarfoot 0 27 140 0 TOTAL VIEWERS WATCHING ADS 0

_____________ 1. If an ad ran for 7 weeks on The Price Is Right, how many times would the ad have been viewed? _____________ 2. If an ad on Gunsmoke was viewed 1,872 times, how many weeks did the ad run?

143

3. To the right of the “Times Ad Viewed” column on the spreadsheet, label a new column “Network.” In the rows under “Network,” enter the following networks for each program:

• CBS (for Gunsmoke) • NBC (for Wagon Train) • CBS (for Have Gun Will Travel) • CBS (for The Danny Thomas Show) • ABC (for Maverick) • NBC (for The Price Is Right) • NBC (for Wanted: Dead or Alive) • NBC (for The Perry Como Show) • ABC (for Sugarfoot)

In the rows under the “Weeks Ad Ran” column, enter 7 for each program.

4. Using the spreadsheet, create a chart (graph). Choose the chart (graph) that will best display

the following information: • Column labels (Program, Weeks Ad Ran, Rating, Weekly Viewers) • All data in the 4 columns (Program, Weeks Ad Ran, Rating, Weekly Viewers) • Do not include the “Times Ad Viewed” column, the “Network” column, or the “TOTAL

VIEWERS WATCHING ADS” row Print your final spreadsheet and chart (graph).

144

Answers to Sample Tests and Notes Edition 2 Multiple-Choice Test 1. The correct answer is D. This question measures your ability to create, format, save and print a

word processed document. 2. The correct answer is D. This question measures your ability to apply searching and sorting

strategies used in a database. 3. The correct answer is B. This question measures your ability to enter and edit data in a prepared

spreadsheet and observe the results. 4. The correct answer is C. This question measures your ability to use e-mails as a means of

communication. 5. The correct answer is B. This question measures your ability to use telecommunications to share

and publish information. 6. The correct answer is C. This question measures your ability to create a multiple-outcome

storyboard as a class activity.

7. The correct answer is D. This question measures your ability to research, create, publish, and present projects related to content areas using a variety of technological tools.

8. The correct answer is B. This question measures your ability to demonstrate an understanding of

copyrights by citing sources of copyrighted materials in papers, projects, and multimedia presentations.

9. The correct answer is A. This question measures your ability to recognize an individual’s rights of

ownership to computer-generated work. Edition 2 Performance Test Part I: Desktop Publishing. The tasks in this section measure your ability to edit and format a word

processing file. Tasks measure the ability to align text, change font type and size, use a spell checker, and demonstrate keyboarding techniques.

Part II: Database Use. 1. The correct answer is “Walt Disney Presents.” This question measures your ability to sort a

database.

2. The correct answer is “Adventures of Ellery Queen.” Your answer is also scored for how well you explain how you determined your answer to the question (“I searched the field MONTHS EXISTED for all records > 150 and searched the field YEARS ON TV for all records < 5”). This question measures your ability to search a database using more than one criterion to solve a problem.

3. This question measures your ability to add a new field and records into a database.

145

Edition 2 Performance Test (continued) Part III: Spreadsheet Use. 1. The correct answer is “1,092.” This question measures your ability to use a spreadsheet to answer

simple “What if” statements.

2. The correct answer is “9.” This question also measures your ability to use a spreadsheet to answer simple “What if” statements.

3. This question measures your ability to label a column and enter data into spreadsheet cells. 4. This question measures your ability to create a chart (graph) using specific data within the

spreadsheet.

146

Sample Test Items for the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Test

Edition 3 (2004 Curriculum): Online Test of Computer Skills and Computer Skills Alternative Assessment

Online Test of Computer Skills The Online Test of Computer Skills consists of 54 operational items that measure the strands set forth and specifically defined in the North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study adopted by the SBE in February 2004: (1) Societal/Ethical Issues, (2) Database, (3) Spreadsheet, (4) Keyboard Utilization/Word Processing/Desk Top Publishing, (5) Multimedia/Presentation, and (6) Telecommunications/Internet. Computer Skills Alternative Assessment The Computer Skills Alternative Assessment consists of 60 operational items (35 multiple choice items and 25 performance-based tasks [constructed response items]) that measure the strands set forth and specifically defined in the North Carolina Computer/Technology Skills Standard Course of Study adopted by the SBE in February 2004: (1) Societal/Ethical Issues, (2) Database, (3) Spreadsheet, (4) Keyboard Utilization/Word Processing/Desk Top Publishing, (5) Multimedia/Presentation, and (6) Telecommunications/Internet. The 15 sample items below are representative of items found on the North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Test Edition 3 (2004 Curriculum). These items, and additional items, can be found in the Test Simulation included with the NCDesk application download. The Test Simulation provides students, administrators, and parents with the opportunity to become familiar with the test environment (i.e., appearance, navigation) and the use of the features/functions within the test environment. In addition, while simulating the test environment, the Test Simulation allows users to practice application skills and actively perform the tasks requested by the sample items (i.e., filtering a database, editing text, etc.). More information on NCDesk and the Test Simulation can be found at http://ncdesk.ncsu.edu/nccs/.

147

Sample Item 1 The correct answer is D. This item measures the student’s knowledge of planning, designing, and developing a multimedia product to present content information in the most effective way.

Sample Item 2 This item measures the student’s ability to select and use WP/DTP features/functions to edit/revise documents/assignments.

148

Sample Item 3 This item measures the student’s ability to use e-mail as a means of interactive communication.

Sample Item 4 This item measures the student’s ability to modify and use spreadsheets to solve problems and display findings.

149

Sample Item 5 This item measures the student’s ability to modify and use databases to analyze, interpret and evaluate data.

Sample Item 6 This item measures the student’s ability to use WP/DTP features to format content projects/products.

150

Sample Item 7 The correct answer is C. This item measures the student’s ability to identify terms/concepts associated with safe, effective, and efficient use of telecommunications and the Internet.

Sample Item 8 This item measures the student’s ability to modify databases to display data.

151

Sample Item 9 This item measures the student’s ability to use multi-tasking concepts such as toggling and pasting between two windows on the desktop.

Sample Item 10 This item measures the student’s ability to use WP/DTP features to format content projects/products.

152

Sample Item 11 The correct answer is C. This item measures the student’s knowledge of information technologies and their impact on schools, workplaces and society.

Sample Item 12 This item measures the student’s ability to select and use spreadsheet formulas and functions.

153

Sample Item 13 This item measures the student’s ability to develop and use search strategies with two or more criteria.

Sample Item 14 The correct answer is B. This item measures the student’s ability to recognize how Copyright Laws protect the ownership of intellectual property.

154

Sample Item 15 This item measures the student’s ability to create graphs/charts to display, analyze, and interpret data for content assignments.

Appendix

155

156



Alpha Academy (K-8) Metrolina Regional Scholars' Academy (K-8) American Renaissance (K-8) Millennium Charter Academy (K-8)Arapahoe Charter School (K-8) Mountain Discovery Charter (K-8)Arts Based Elementary (K-5) Neuse Charter School (K-5)ArtSpace Charter School (K-8) Omuteko Gwamaziima (K-8) Bethany Community Middle (6-8) Orange Charter School (K-8)Bethel Hill Charter School (K-6) PACE Academy (9-12)Brevard Academy (K-8) Phoenix Academy (K-5)Bridges (K-8) Piedmont Community School (K-12)Cape Fear Center for Inquiry (K-8) Pine Lake Preparatory (K-2)Cape Lookout Marine Science (9-12) PreEminent Charter School (K-8) Carolina International School (K-10) Provisions Academy (6-12)Carter Community School (K-8) Quality Education Academy (K-10)Casa Esperanza Montessori (K-6) Queen's Grant Community Schools (K-10)Charlotte Secondary School (6) Quest Academy (K-8)Charter Day School (K-8) Raleigh Charter High School (9-12)Chatham Charter School (K-8) Research Triangle Charter Academy (K-8)Children's Community School (K-6) River Mill Academy (K-12)CIS Academy (6-8) Rocky Mount Prep. School (K-12)Clover Garden (K-12) Roxboro Community School (7-11)Columbus Charter School (K-3) Sallie B. Howard School (K-8)Community Partners High (9-12) Sandhills Theatre Arts Renaissance School (STARS) (K-8)Crosscreek Charter (K-8) Socrates Academy (K-3)Crossnore Academy (K-12) SPARC Academy (K-8)Crossroads Charter High (9-12) Sterling Montessori Academy (K-8)Dillard Academy (K-4) Success Institute (K-8)East Wake Academy (K-12) Sugar Creek Charter School (K-8)Evergreen Community Charter (K-8) Summit Charter School (K-8)Exploris Middle School (6-8) The Academy of Moore County (K-8)Forsyth Academies (K-8) The Carter G. Woodson School (K-12)Francine Delany New School for Children (K-8) The Central Park School for Children (K-5)Gaston College Preparatory (5-11) The Children's Village Academy (K-6)Grandfather Academy (5-12) The Community Charter School (K-5)Gray Stone Day School (9-12) The Downtown Middle School (5-8)Greensboro Academy (K-8) The Franklin Academy (K-12)Guilford Prep Academy (K-8) The Hawbridge School (9-12)Haliwa-Saponi Tribal (K-12) The Laurinburg Homework Center (8-12)Healthy Start Academy Charter (K-8) The Mountain Community School (K-8)Highland Charter Public School (K-3) The New Dimensions School (K-5)Hope Elementary School (K-5) The Woods Charter School (1-12)Kennedy School (6-12) Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy (K-12)Kestrel Heights School (6-12) Tiller School (K-5)Kinston Charter Academy (K-8) Torchlight Academy (K-5)KIPP: Charlotte (5) Two Rivers Community School (K-8)Lake Norman Charter School (5-8) Union Academy (K-11)Learning Center (K-8) Vance Charter School (K-8)Lincoln Charter School (K-12) Voyager Academy (4-7)Magellan Charter School (3-8) Washington Montessori (K-8)Maureen Joy Charter School (K-8) Wilmington Preparatory Academy (K-4)

List of North Carolina Charter Schools, 2007-08

157

the report of student performance on the north carolina tests of

Documents