the role of abstract and citation databases in supporting data repositories
DESCRIPTION
The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories. DataCite Workshop: Möglichkeiten und neue Lösungen im Forschungsdatenmanagement Köln - 12/12/2012 Michael Habib, MSLS Product Manager, Scopus [email protected]. More than 5,000 publishers - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories
DataCite Workshop: Möglichkeiten und neue Lösungen im Forschungsdatenmanagement Köln - 12/12/2012
Michael Habib, MSLSProduct Manager, [email protected]
![Page 2: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Broadest source for research answers
18,819Peer reviewed journals
405Trade journals
332Book series
A rich and extended coverage including
19,804 active titles
248Conf. series
2 million new records are added each year via daily updatesTotal average processing time: 5 days
![Page 3: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Breadth of coverage across subject areas
More than 19,500 titles in Scopus, titles can be in more than one subject area
Health Sciences 6,300
• (100% Medline)
• Nursing
• Dentistry
• etc.,
Social Sciences 6,350
• Psychology
• Economics
• Business
• A&H
• etc.,
Life Sciences 4,050
• Neuroscience
• Pharmacology
• Biology
• etc.,
Physical Sciences 6,600
• Chemistry
• Physics
• Engineering
• etc.,
![Page 4: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Broader coverage than nearest peer
Scopus (Total: 19,809)
Web of Science(Total: 12,311)
8,432
934
11,377
www.jisc-adat.com
Scopus added value
![Page 5: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Broadest coverage of quality global content including Asia and emerging countries
• …
Nearest Competitor Scopus 0
150
300
500
0
250
0
1,000
2,000
0
1,000
2,000
0
4,000
8,000
0
4,000
8,000
600
300
0
Elsevier constitutes approximately 15% of titles in Scopus
![Page 6: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
More expansive coverage does not meanlower standards
Scopus Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB)
![Page 7: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Scopus selection criteria
Journalpolicy
• Convincing editorial concept/policy• Level of peer-review• Diversity in geographic distribution of editors• Diversity in geographic distribution of authors
Quality ofcontent
• Academic contribution to the field• Clarity of abstracts• Quality and conformity with stated aims & scope• Readability of articles
Journal standing
• Citedness of journal articles in Scopus• Editor standing
Regularity • No delay in publication schedule
Online availability
• Content available online• English-language journal home page• Quality of home page
Minimum criteria
• Peer-review
• English abstracts
• Regular publication
• References in Roman script
• Publication ethics statement
![Page 8: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Titles reviewed(n=2,279, January 2011 – 15 May 2012)
2,279 titles reviewed of which 41% accepted
Num
ber o
f titl
es re
view
ed
Acce
ptan
ce ra
te
![Page 9: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(Researchers, N = 3824 ; study by Publishing Research Consortium, 2010)
High importance but noteasily accessible
![Page 10: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
– establish easier access to research data on the Internet
– increase acceptance of research data as legitimate, citable contributions to the scholarly record
– support data archiving that will permit results to be verified and re-purposed for future study.
From: http://datacite.org/whatisdatacite emphasis my own
What is DataCite?
![Page 11: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pro’s• Coupling of data and article• Peer review• Preservation (byte-wise)• Citation mechanism
Con’s• Limited data type support• Compatibility (format support)• Limited capacity• Data not centrally stored
Supplementary Material
![Page 12: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Supplementary material is not a perfect solution• Many poor solutions in use: data on PCs, university websites, personal
homepages, ...• Data repositories: the community’s answer?
– Scientists prefer independent data repositories above publishers– Domain-specific coordination– Centralized information “hubs”
• “Raw data should be freelyaccessible to researchers” “... believe that, as a general principle,
data sets, raw data outputs of research, and sets or subsets of that data should wherever possible be made freely accessible to other scholars ...”(Statement from STM & ALPSP, June 2006)
Connecting with Data Repositories
![Page 13: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Database Subject Type of Linking
CCDC Crystallography Article-level
PANGAEA Earth Sciences Article-level*
EMBL Molecular Interactions
Chemistry Entity, tagging
Molecular INTeraction DB Chemistry Entity, tagging
Genbank Nucleotides Entity, tagging
UniProt Proteins Entity, tagging
Protein Data Bank Proteins Entity, tagging
ClinicalTrials Medicine Entity, tagging
TAIR (Arabidopsis) Model organism Entity, tagging
Mendelian Inheritance in Men
Genetics, inheritance Entity, tagging
*: with Application
ScienceDirect Examples
![Page 14: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(86)90033-2
PANGAEA Supplementary Data
![Page 15: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
– establish easier access to research data on the Internet
– increase acceptance of research data as legitimate, citable contributions to the scholarly record
– support data archiving that will permit results to be verified and re-purposed for future study.
From: http://datacite.org/whatisdatacite emphasis my own
What is DataCite?
![Page 17: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ScopusExample
![Page 20: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
(Researchers, N = 3824 ; study by Publishing Research Consortium, 2010)
High importance but noteasily accessible
![Page 21: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1.Pilot with specific community of authors, publishers, and data repositories, to try and change behaviours (in concept phase)
2.Track, count, and analyze citations to Documents as proof of Data impact (research needs to be done)
3.Establish links from Scopus Document Records to related Data sets to improve discovery (PANGAEA first step, looking to expand)
4.Ingest and index Data Repository (DataCite) records and enable searching from Scopus (the future)
5.Track Citations from Documents to Data sets (the more distant future)
Scopus priorities moving forward
![Page 22: The Role of Abstract and Citation Databases in Supporting Data Repositories](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070502/568149ec550346895db71afb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Michael Habib, MSLSProduct Manager, [email protected]://twitter.com/habibhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565
Thank you