the seventh and eighth amendment eric french john cassidy austin light
DESCRIPTION
THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT Bans unusual punishment Bans excessive bail Bans excessive finesTRANSCRIPT
THE SEV
ENTH AND
EIGHTH AMENDMENT
E R I C F
R E N C H J OH N C
A S S I DY A
U S T I N L
I GH T
THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT• Cases that involve less than $20
($75,000 Today) will not be handled in the federal courts.
• This amendment guarantees a jury for Civil Cases in Federal Courts
• It prohibits people from setting up their own court system. All cases are held in courts recognized by the government
THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT• Bans unusual punishment• Bans excessive bail• Bans excessive fines
HISTORY OF THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT• Hugh Williamson- proposed it• Bill of Rights• James Madison • Went into effect with the
Constitution
THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT• Nearly identical to the provision in
English Bill of Rights• Titus Oates • Whipped while being tied to a
moving cart• Probably had intolerable acts in
mind
CASES IN WHICH SEVENTH AMENDMENT WAS USED• United States v. Wonson• Chief Justice Joseph Story• “The Historical Test”• Used to analyze if a jury needs to
be present• Anytime there is a civil suit, this
amendment is being used
COLGROVE V. BATTINA local district in Montana provided a six person jury.
Colgrove was given a six person jury and he demanded a twelve person jury. He said the six person jury violated the 7th Amendment.
Issue: Did the 7th Amendment guarantee the size of the jury?No, the 7th Amendment does not guarantee the size of the jury.
CASES IN WHICH THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT WAS USED• Wilkerson v. Utah • Established cruel and unusual
punishment no matter what the crime
• Drawing or quartering• Public dissections• Burned alive• Disembowelment
STACK V. BOYLE• Stack v Boyle was a case involving members
of the communist party who were charged with conspiring to violate the smith act. The district had set bail fixed amount of $50,000 for each petitioners.
• The defendant moved to reduce the bail stating that the price for bail is to excessive and unconstitutional
• The Supreme Court agreed and said it was excessive
CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO• They both fall under the rights of
the accused• Both of them have to do with court
trials & rulings• If seventh is not followed, the judge
could decide anything, which in turn could violate the eighth amendment if they were unfair
THE END