the space junk
DESCRIPTION
Typography design book of Elsa ChungTRANSCRIPT
the revolution of pollution via earth to aerospace
the JUNK storm
12/Sep/1959Luna 2
09/may/1965Luna 5
14/juLy/1967Surveyor 4
07/jan/1968Surveyor 7
14/nov/1969apoLLo 12
26/juLy/1971apoLLo 15
8/jan/1973Luna 21
07/jan/1998Lunar proSpector
26/juLy/1971apoLLo 15
24/jan/1990hitenfirSt japaneSe Lunar miSSion
21/dec/1966Luna 13
28/juLy/1964ranger7
03/dec/1965Luna 8
10/aug/1966Lunar orbiter 1
05/feb/1967Lunar orbiter 3
01/aug/1967Lunar orviter 5
12/Sep/1970Luna 16
02/Sep/1971Luna 18
07/jan/1998Lunar proSpectorinto a crater to Search for water
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
the revolution of pollution via earth to aerospace
the JUNK storm
the space exploratioN
coNteNt // page06
dealiNgwithdebris
page24
the operatioNal aspects
page38
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
///////////// //// /// /// //////////// /// // /// /////////// // /// ////////// // // /////////// //// // ///////////// ///////// /////// //
Mohawk fine papers inc.
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
///////////// //// /// /// //////////// /// // /// /////////// // /// ////////// // // /////////// //// // ///////////// ///////// /////// //
mohawk fine papers inc. is the largest manufacturer of premium print-ing and imaging papers in the country. privately owned and certified as women owned business enterprise, this highly successful company has grown from 900 tons per year on three paper machines to over 175, 000 tons capacity per year on six modernized machines. the company thriveson its competitive spirit and ability to combine the craft of traditional pap-ermaking with cutting-edge technology. mohawk fine papers inc. is alsothe exclusive marketer of Kromekote and Knightkote, coated brands man-ufactured by the Smart papers. > Story began with mohawk and hudson paper company, which was established after the civil war at a formeraxhandle factory on King’s canal in waterford, new york. the enterprisewas purchased in 1872 by frank gilbert, and renamed the frank gil-
bert paper company. nathaniel Sylvester describes the operation as employing 40 people who produced three tons of printing paper per day, using rags, wood and straw as raw materials. the mill building was pur-chased from uri gilbert, a prominent manufacturer of railroad cars in the1881. the frank gilbert paper company constructed their second paper mill in cohoes in 1917, just south of the junction of the erie and cham-plain canals. it manufactured groundwood, bond, mimeo, and wallpaperbase stock and was known as frank gilbert paper company until 1930 when it filed for bankruptcy. george o’connor, a waterford lawyer, and grandfather of current president and ceo.
10
the first steps into space were taken by german scientists during world war ii while testing the v2 rocket which became the first human-made object in space. after the war, the allies used ger-man scientists and their captured rockets in programs for both military and civilian research. that was 1949, its the begging of space exploration. from that period, human keep developing aero-space technology into different ways. > nowadays, we talk on cell phone every single days, we use gpS when we are driving, and watching weather report to know the weather in the future. wealso listen to the traffic report from internet or radio, we even check googLe map to see how our roof looks from the space view. all this information is based on what is sent by artificial satel-lites. our life relate to aerospace technology unconsciously. this fancy high-tech equipment no longer belongs to Space administration or military, it has been benefiting our life as well. > how-ever, satellites or space stations actually cannot be used forever. they retire when they run out offuel or have broken machinery. they become a giant metal trash floating around the earth for thereason of gravity. in 1958, the uS launched vanguard i into a medium earth orbit. it became one of the longest surviving pieces of space junk and as of 2009 remains the oldest piece still in orbit. there are over 20,000 objects surrounding earth now and the amount is still growing. the speed of these space debris are so fast that can easyly damage space ships or any working man-made satellites which we might use everyday.
via earth to outer space //
12mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
via earth to outer space //
11
1chapter oNe // history of aerospace techNology
whipple proved useful data when space exploration started just afew years later.
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
Space exploration is the use of astronomy and space technology to explore outer space. physical exploration of space is conducted both by human spaceflights and by robotic spacecraft. while the observation of objects in space, known as astronomy, predates reliable recorded history, it was the development of large liquid fuelled rocket engines during the early 20th century that allowed physical space exploration to become a reality. common rationales for exploring space include advancing scientific research, uniting different nations, ensuring future survival of humanity and developing military and strategic advantages against other countries. various criticisms of spaceexploration are sometimes made, enerally on cost or safety grounds. > Space exploration has often been used as a proxy competition for geopolitical rivalries such as the cold war. the early aera of space exploration was driven by a Space race between the Soviet union and the united States; the launch of the first man-made object to orbit the earth, the uSSr’s Sputnik 1, on octo-ber 4, 1957, and the first moon landing by the american apollo 11 craft on july 20, 1969 are often taken as the boundaries for this initial period. the Soviet space program achieved many of the first milestones, including the first living being in orbit in 1957, the first human spaceflight in 1961, the first spacewalk in 1965, the first automatic landing on another celestial body in 1966, and the launch of the first space station in 1971. > after the first 20 years of exploration, focus shifted from one-off flights to renewable hardware, such as the “Space Shuttle program”, and from competition to cooperation as with the international Space Station. from 1990, onwards, private interests began promoting space tourism and then private space exploration of the moon. > in 2000, china initiated a successful manned spaceflight program, while japan and india have also planned future manned space missions. Larger government programs have advocated manned missions to the moon and possibly mars sometime after 2010.
1615
1957
1958
1961
1969
1959
1960
firSt man-made object to orbit the earth, iS Launched and remainS in orbit untiL jan. 1958.
the firSt u.S. SateLLite in orbit, LiftS off atcape canaveraL uSing a modified abmajpL jupiter-c rocKet. it carrieS a Scientific exper-iment of jameS a. van aLLen, and diScoverS the earth’S radiation beLt.
oStoK 1 iS Launched by the uSSr, and carrying coSmonaut yuri a. gargarin, the firSt man inSpace. he orbitS the earth once.
neiL armStrong and edwin aLdrin, jr. made thefirSt manned Soft Landing on the moon, and aLSo the firSt moonwaLK, uSing apoLLo 11. at the Same year, Soyuz 4 and 5 perform the firSt Soviet Space Ship docKing, tranSferringcoSmonautS between vehicLeS.
Luna 1, firSt man-made SateLLite to orbit themoon, iS Launched by the uSSr. Luna 2 iS Lau-nched, impacting on the moon on Septembercarrying a copy of the Soviet coat of armS, and aLSo becoming the firSt man-made object to hit the moon.
tiroS 1, the firSt SucceSSfuL weather SateLL-ite iS Launched by uS. diScoverer xiv LauncheS it iS aLSo the firSt camera-equipped Spy Sat-eLLite that uS have.
tiMeline // space exploration
SmaLL debriS
0 89 173 456 847
0.025 KiLogram 25 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
1970 1971
197819771974
1981
1982
1986
1983
apoLLo 13 iS Launched, Suffering an expLoSionin itS Sm oxygen tanKS. itS moon Landing iS abo-rted, and the crew return SafeLy.
apoLLo 14 moon miSSion iS Launched by the uS with the Legendary aLan Shepard, aLong with Stuart rooSa and edgar mitcheLL on board. they Land in the pLanned apoLLo 13 Site.
einStein obServatory beginS itS 30 dayS miS-Sion. two pioneer Spacecraft reach venuS. one dropS four probeS into the atmoSphere, whiLe the other mapS the Surface.
Soviet SaLyut 6 Space Station iS Launched. itS crewS incLude memberS from czechoSLova-Kia, poLand, gdr, buLgaria, hungary, vietnam,cuba, mongoLia, and romania.
naSa LauncheS the firSt SynchronouS mete-oroLogicaL SateLLite. aLSo, their firSt miLitarySpace Station, Soviet SaLyut 3, iS Launched. it remainS in orbit untiL january 1975.
the firSt manned miSSion of the Space tran-Sportation SyStem Launched. the european Space agency LauncheS itS third ariane roc-Ket aLSo happened in thiS year aS weLL.
the european Space agency LauncheS itS third ariane rocKet. voyager 2 compLeteS itS fLyby of Saturn. the Space ShuttLe coLumbia’S fifth miSSion, itS firSt operationaL one, beginS, dep-Loying two SateLLiteS.
aStronomerS diScovered an inviSibLe gravity Source that SpLitS a quaSar’S Light. aStrono-merS aLSo found that our gaLaxy iS SmaLLer than they thought and the Sun iS 23000 Light-yearS from it’S center.
Space ShuttLe chaLLenger LiftS off for itS fir-St miSSion and the firSt Space waLK made by the uS in nine yearS.
1354 1589 1890 2165
0.658 centimetreS 0.259 inch
1817
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
in the context of spaceflight, a satellite is an object which has been placed into orbit by human end-eavor. Such objects are sometimes called artificial satellites to distinguish them from natural satellites such as the moon. > in 1957, the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, was launched by the Soviet union. by 2009 thousands of satellites had been launched into orbit around the earth. these originate from more than 50 countries have used satellites launching capabilities of ten nations. a few hundred satellites are currently operational, whereas thousands of unused satel-lites and satellite fragments orbit the earth as space debris. a few space probes have been placed into orbit around other bodies and become artificial satellites to the moon, venus, mars, jupiter and Saturn. common types of satellites include military and civilian earth observation satellites, communication satellites, navigation satellites, weather satellites, and research satellites. Space stations and human spacecraft in orbit are also satellites. Satellite orbits vary greatly, dependingon the purpose of the satellite, and are classified in a number of ways. well-known classes include low earth orbit, polar orbit, and geostationary orbit. > Satellites are semi independent computercontrolled systems. a spacecraft is a craft or machine designed for spaceflight. Satellite subsys-tems attend many tasks attitude control and orbit control. on a sub-orbital spaceflight, a space-craft enters space then returns to the earth. for an orbital spaceflight, a spacecraft enters a closed orbit around the planetary body. Spacecraft used for human spaceflight carry people onb-oard as crew or passengers. robotic spacecraft that leave the vicinity of the planetary body arespace probes. the spacecrafts used for robotic space missions operate eitherautonomously ortelerobotically. robotic spacecraft that remain in orbit around the planetary body are artificial satellites. Starships, which are built for interstellar travel, are so far a theoretical concept only. Spaceships bring astronauts into space to help repair damaged or broken sattelites.
2019
china 2750c. i. S (former uSSr) 4360european Space agency 0074united StateS 4280other 1173
china
other
european Space agency
united StateS
c. i. S (former uSSr)
2586 2984 3254 3698 4682
0.32 KiLogram 320 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
just as an individual ship seems tiny compared to the immensity of thesea, or an airplane relative to the entirety of the sky, man made satellites seem very insignificant in size compared to the vastness of space. the collection of material referred to as “space debris” ranges in size fromtiny paint chips to huge space stations. but relative size alone does notnecessarily determine the extent of the threat to humans posed by orbi-tal debris. > those who argue space debris does not pose a significant threat to humans draw their confidence from the vastness of space itself, the ability of the atmosphere to burn up objects before they reach earth’s surface, and from ongoing efforts by engineers and scientists to minimize the proliferation of space debris and to protect against it. no one has been killed by space debris, and satellites and space vesselshave rarely sustained serious damage from impacts in orbit. > those who fear space debris poses an imminent threat argue that uncertainty surrounding the dangers of space debris is reason enough to proceedwith the greatest of caution. rather than draw comfort from the absence
of any catastrophic collisions during the first four decades of space exp-loration, they point to a collection of observa-tions of minor to moderate impacts as warning sign of potential disaster. although serious damage has been avoided, space debris has fallen in and near populated areas, inju-red people, killed livestock, damaged terrestrial structures, and caused observable damage to satellites or space vehicles. any increase in space-based technology could easily lead to an increase in such events, with anaccompanying threat of more serious consequences. perhaps the great-est worry associated with space debris comes from the possibility thathighly toxic nuclear and chemical fuels used in space vehicles could re-enter the earth’s atmosphere and contaminate a populated area.
22
the total nuMber of space debrits
0.1968 inch
5398 6175 7246 8246 8365
0.5 centimetreS
21
2chapter two //iNtrodUctioN of space debris
Space debriS // orbitaL debriS // Space junK // Space waSte
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
in 1946, during the giacobinid meteor shower, helmut Landsberg collected several small mag-netic particles that apparently were associated with the shower. fred whipple was intrigued bythis and wrote a paper that demonstrated that particles of this size were too small to maintain their velocity when they encountered the upper atmosphere. instead, they would quickly decelerate and then fall to earth unmelted. at the time some argued that meteors were extra-solar in origin, while others claimed they were leftovers from the formation of the solar system. these direct measurements were able to locate the source of the meteors, demonstrating that the bulk of mat-erial was leftover from comet tails, and that none of it could be demonstrated to have an extra solar origin. today, it is understood that meteors of all sorts are leftover material from the formationof the solar system, part of the interplanetary dust cloud or the various other objects made up from this material, like comets. > a lack of good data about the debris problem prompted a seriesof studies to better characterize the Leo environment. naSa provided Kessler with additional funding for the further studies of the problem. Several approaches were used by these studies.Some used optical telescopes or short-wavelength radars to more accurately measure the num-ber and size of objects in space. the optical measurements alone demonstrated that the publishedpopulation count was too low by at least 50%. before this it was believed that the database wasessentially complete and accounted for at least the majority of large objects in orbit. these meas-urements demonstrated that lists deliberately eliminated some objects, could not easily accountfor objects under 20 centimetres in size, and did not bother to track many others because they were considered unimportant. in particular, the debris left over from exploding rocket boosters and several anti-satellite tests were only tracked in a haphazard way in the main database from 1960. > others studies used microscopes to study spacecraft that had returned to earth, looking for impacts that had already taken place and had gone unnoticed. Sections of Skylab and the apollo cSms that had been recovered in the 1960 and 1970 were shown to be heavily pitted by debris. to everyone’s surprise, every study demonstrated that the debris flux was much higher than expected, and that debris was already the primary source of collisions in space. Similar stud-ies continue to this day. one discovery was particularly disconcerting was that 42% of all debriswere the result of only 19 events, explosions of spent rocket stages, mostly from the uS deltas. Kessler made this discovery after using gabbard’s methods against known debris fields, overturn-ing the previously held belief that most unknown debris was from formerly unknown aSat tests.the delta was a workhorse of the uS space program, and there were already numerous other delta components in orbit that had not yet exploded.
2827
8659 8957 9642 10244 12546
0.45 KiLogram 450 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
Spa
cecr
aft
in a
deb
ris
fiel
d ar
e su
bjec
t to
con
stan
t w
ear
as a
res
ult
of
impa
cts
wit
h sm
all d
ebri
s. c
riti
cal a
reas
of s
pace
craf
t ar
e no
rmal
ly p
ro-
tect
ed b
y w
hipp
le s
hiel
ds, e
limin
atin
g m
ost
dam
age.
how
ever
, low
-mas
sim
pact
s ha
ve a
dir
ect i
mpa
ct o
n th
e lif
e-ti
me
of s
pace
mis
sion
s, if
spa
cecr
aft
is p
ower
ed b
y so
lar
pane
ls. t
hese
pan
els
are
diff
icul
t to
pro
tect
bec
ause
thei
r fr
ont
face
has
to
be d
irec
tly
expo
sed
to t
he s
un.
as
a re
sult
, th
eyar
e of
ten
punc
ture
d by
deb
ris.
whe
n hi
t, p
anel
s te
nd n
ot t
o pr
oduc
e ne
wde
bris
as
muc
h as
a c
loud
of
gas
-siz
ed p
arti
cles
tha
t do
es n
ot p
rese
nt
as m
uch
of a
ris
k to
oth
er s
pace
craf
t. t
his
gas
is g
ener
ally
pla
sma
whe
ncr
eate
d an
d co
nseq
uent
ly p
rese
nts
elec
tric
al r
isks
to
the
pane
ls t
hem
-se
lves
. >
e
ffec
ts o
f m
any
impa
cts
wit
h sm
alle
r de
bris
was
par
ticu
larl
y no
tabl
e on
mir
, th
e S
ovie
t sp
ace
stat
ion,
as
it r
emai
ned
in s
pace
for
long
peri
ods
of t
ime
wit
h th
e pa
nels
ori
gin
ally
laun
ched
on
its
vari
ous
mod
ul-
es. i
mpa
cts
wit
h la
rger
deb
ris
norm
ally
des
troy
spa
cecr
afts
. to
date
ther
eha
ve b
een
seve
ral k
now
n an
d su
spec
ted
impa
ct e
vent
s. t
rack
ing
show
ed
it h
ad s
uffe
red
som
e so
rt o
f br
eak
up w
ith
the
crea
tion
of
30
0 o
bjec
ts.
Kos
mos
did
not
con
tain
any
vol
atile
s an
d is
wid
ely
assu
med
to
have
suf
-fe
red
a co
llisi
on w
ith
a sm
all
obje
ct.
how
ever
, pr
oof
is l
acki
ng,
and
an
elec
tric
al b
atte
ry e
xplo
sion
has
bee
n of
fere
d as
a p
ossi
ble
alte
rnat
ive.
Kos
mos
14
84
suf
fere
d a
sim
ilar
mys
teri
ous
brea
kup
on o
ctob
er,
19
93
. S
ever
al c
onfi
rmed
impa
ct e
vent
s ha
ve t
aken
pla
ce s
ince
the
n. o
lym
pus
was
hit
by
a m
eteo
r an
d le
ft a
drif
t on
aug
ust,
19
93
. >
o
n ju
ly,
19
96
,th
e fr
ench
mic
rosa
telli
te c
eris
e w
as h
it b
y fr
agm
ents
of
an a
rian
e-1
uppe
r-st
age
boos
ter
that
had
exp
lode
d in
nov
embe
r 1
98
6.
on
mar
ch,
20
06
, the
rus
sian
exp
ress
-am
11
com
mun
icat
ions
sat
ellit
e w
as s
truc
k by
an
unk
now
n ob
ject
whi
ch r
ende
red
it in
oper
able
. Luc
kily
, th
e en
gin
eers
had
enou
gh
tim
e in
con
tact
wit
h th
e sp
acec
raft
to
send
it
to a
par
king
orbi
t ou
t of
ge
o.
>
the
firs
t m
ajor
spa
ce d
ebri
s co
llisi
on w
as o
n 2
00
9.
the
deac
tiva
ted
95
0 k
ilog
ram
s K
osm
os-2
25
1 a
nd a
n op
erat
iona
l 5
60
kilo
gram
s ir
idiu
m 3
3 c
ollid
ed 5
00
mile
s ov
er n
orth
ern
Sib
eria
. the
rel
ativ
esp
eed
of i
mpa
ct w
as a
bout
11
kilo
met
res
per
seco
nd,
or a
ppro
xim
atel
y1
20
kilo
met
res
per
hour
. b
oth
sate
llite
s w
ere
dest
roye
d an
d th
e co
llisi
onsc
atte
red
cons
ider
able
deb
ris,
whi
ch p
oses
an
elev
ated
ris
k to
spa
ce-
craf
t. t
he c
ollis
ion
crea
ted
a de
bris
clo
ud,
alth
oug
h ac
cura
te e
stim
ates
of n
umbe
r of
pie
ces
of d
ebri
s is
not
yet
ava
ilabl
e. in
a K
essl
er S
yndr
ome
casc
ade,
sat
ellit
e lif
etim
es w
ould
be
mea
sure
d on
the
ord
er o
f ye
ars
or
mon
ths.
new
sat
ellit
es c
ould
be
laun
ched
thr
ough
the
deb
ris
fiel
d in
to h
ig-
her
orbi
ts o
r pl
aced
in lo
wer
one
s w
here
nat
ural
dec
ay p
roce
sses
rem
ove
the
debr
is, b
ut it
is p
reci
sely
bec
ause
of
the
utili
ty o
f th
e or
bits
bet
wee
n 8
00
and
1,
50
0 k
ilom
etre
s th
at t
his
regi
on is
so
fille
d w
ith
debr
is.
0.285 inch
13548 14028 16572 16729 19875
0.724 centimetreS
2930
cargo bay damage
5 cm
1 cm
5 mm
3 mm
1 mm
0. 5 mm
0. 25 mm
cargo bay damage
SpaceSuite penetration
window repLacement
cabin penetraion
thermaL tiLe penetration
noSe and wing damage
21547 23456 31597 33679 42674
0.756 KiLogram 756 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
tiny rocks, paint flecks and other fragments of junk whizzing around the earth pose the greatest threat to the shuttles and the astronauts onboard, according to the preliminary results of a new naSa risk study. engineers and scientists long have known the stuff pounding the shut-tle as it flies through space can do catastrophic damage. until now, fewput space debris on the same level as the dangers seen during the shut-tle’s treacherous launch or its fiery plunge back through the atmosphere to land. the internal risk assessment, still under review by the agency’sexperts, says space debris hitting different parts of the orbiter accounts for 11 of the 20 problems most likely to cause the loss of another shut-tle and crew. overall, space debris accounts for half of the catastrophic risk on any flight. > naSa would not comment on the study, saying it is incomplete. the agency also would not permit interviews with people who’ve worked for more than five years on the study, even though the off-icials have made multiple presentations about the preliminary results at industry events. “we do not comment on things that are not done,” saidmelissa mathews, the spokesman at the agency’s headquarters in wash-ington. Shuttles will continue to orbit, as much as possible, in a backwardposition that keeps delicate parts such as its heat shield and windows guarded against direct impacts. one new tactic will be, after the shuttledocks at the international Space Station, flipping the two connected spa-cecraft around so the better armored station shields the orbiter. new inspace shuttle inspections also will help detect debris damage. > the2003 shuttle risk assessment is the first to incorporate the threat from orbital debris. the new assessment indicates about half of the risk of disaster on any given shuttle mission involves space debris hitting theorbiter, and, consequently, damaging some component needed to keep the crew alive in space or safely return them to the earth. past risk asse-ssments attributed most risk to thousands of possible mishaps during the fraction of time it takes to go from a standstill on the launch pad to the 20, 000 mph necessary to escape the grip of the gravity of earth. >
this study says space debris hits on different spots on the wing flaps are the two most likely catastrophic failures. the damage could rendean elevon, or wing flap, unable to steer and slow the orbiter as it plum-mets through the atmosphere. without them, the orbiter could burn up,rip apart or veer far off planned landing course. ten other space debrisfailure modes involve space junk damaging the heat shield. investigators initially suspected orbital debris might have caused columbia’s destruc-tion. forensic evidence later showed the shuttle burned up because of a hole in its heat shield in the same spot where a piece of foam insulation slammed into the wing during the shuttle’s launch. > Still, the possibilityalarmed the investigators enough to recommend that naSa makes the shuttle at least as safe as the international Space Station when it comes to surviving hits by space junk. naSa correctly points out, however, that the station was built to higher standards because it is more exposed. itstays in space permanently compared with the relatively small number of days that shuttles are in space in a given year. naSa says it’s trying to decrease the odds of a space debris disaster from about 1 in 200 to 1 in 600. achieving the same strength as the space station is not likely.
0.597 inch
51287 53671 62157 67819 70248
1.5 centimetreS
3132
every satellite has the potential to create space debris.
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
every satellite, space probe and manned mission has the potential to create space debris. any impact between two objects of sizeable mass spalls off shrapnel debris from the force of colli-sion. each piece of shrapnel has the potential to cause further damage, creating even more space debris. with a large enough collision, the amount of cascading debris could be enough to render low earth orbit essentially unusable. the problem in Leo is compounded by the fact that there are few universal orbits that keep spacecraft in particular rings, as opposed to geo, a single wid-ely used orbit. the closest would be the sun synchronous orbits that maintain a constant angle between the sun and orbital plane. but Leo satellites are different orbital planes providing global coverage. Since sun synchronous orbits are polar, the polar regions are common crossing points.
3433
de
ad
Spa
ce
cr
af
t
LoS
t e
qu
ipm
en
t
bo
oS
ter
S
de
br
iS f
ro
m a
nd
aS
a w
ea
po
n
one
par
ticu
lar
seri
es o
f sa
telli
tes
pres
ents
an
addi
tion
al c
on-
cern
. in
19
70
to
19
80
, th
e S
ovie
t u
nion
laun
ched
a n
umbe
r of
na
val s
urve
illan
ce s
atel
lites
as
part
of
thei
r r
or
Sa
t p
rgra
m.
as
rada
r re
turn
s fa
ll of
f w
ith
the
four
th p
ower
, in
ord
er t
o ob
t-ai
n us
eful
ret
urns
the
sat
ellit
es w
ere
pow
ered
wit
h a
be
S-5
nu
clea
r re
acto
r in
ord
er t
o pr
ovid
e en
oug
h en
erg
y to
the
bro
-ad
cast
er.
the
sate
llite
s w
ere
norm
ally
boo
sted
into
a m
ediu
m
alti
tude
gra
veya
rd o
rbit
, bu
t th
ere
wer
e se
vera
l fa
ilure
s th
at
resu
lted
in
radi
oact
ive
mat
eria
l re
achi
ng g
roun
d. e
ven
thos
e su
cces
sful
ly d
ispo
sed
of n
ow f
ace
a de
bris
issu
e of
the
ir o
wn,
w
ith
a ca
lcul
ated
pro
babi
lity
of 8
% t
hat
one
will
be
punc
ture
d an
d re
leas
e it
s co
olan
t ov
er a
ny 5
0 y
ear
peri
od.
the
cool
ant
self
for
ms
into
dro
plet
s ar
ound
1 c
enti
met
re i
n si
ze a
nd r
ep-
rese
nt a
sig
nifi
cant
deb
ris
sour
ce o
f th
eir
own.
deb
ris
is a
lso
so
ur
ce
s o
f d
eb
ris
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
com
mon
ly c
ause
d du
ring
spa
ce w
alks
. th
e lo
wer
sta
ges
, su
ch
as S
olid
roc
ket
boo
ster
s of
the
Spa
ce S
hutt
le,
or t
he S
atur
n ib
sta
ge o
f th
e p
rogr
am a
pollo
era
, do
not
rea
ch o
rbit
al v
eloc
i-ti
es a
nd d
o no
t ad
d to
the
mas
s lo
ad in
orb
it. u
pper
sta
ges,
like
th
e in
erti
al u
pper
Sta
ge,
star
t an
d en
d th
eir
prod
ucti
ve li
ves
inor
bit.
boo
ster
s re
mai
n a
seri
ous
debr
is p
robl
em a
nd o
ne o
f th
em
ajor
kno
wn
impa
ct e
vent
s w
as d
ue t
o an
ari
ane
boos
ter
3635
12/Sep/1959Luna 2
09/may/1965Luna 5
14/juLy/1967Surveyor 4
21/dec/1966Luna 13
28/juLy/1964ranger7
03/dec/1965Luna 8
10/aug/1966Lunar orbiter 1
05/feb/1967Lunar orbiter 3
ScueSSfuL Landed
craSh Landed
coLLected SampLeS
crewed miSSion
depoSited mirrorS
rover
01/aug/1967Lunar orviter 5
31/jan/1966Luna 9maKed a controLLed Landing and tooK photoS from the moon’S Surface
17/feb/1965ranger 8
21/march/1965ranger 9
20/Sep/1966Surveyor 2
04/may/1967Lunar orbiter 4
17/apr/1967Surveyor 3
06/nov/1966Lunar orbiter 2
07/dec/1967Surveyor 6
31/jan/1966Surveur 1
Moon landings // froM 1959 to 2009
71247 73579 83457 86704 90157
0.89 KiLogram 890 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
moon
07/jan/1968Surveyor 7
14/nov/1969apoLLo 12
26/juLy/1971apoLLo 15
8/jan/1973Luna 21
07/jan/1998Lunar proSpector
26/juLy/1971apoLLo 15
24/jan/1990hitenfirSt japaneSe Lunar miSSion
12/Sep/1970Luna 16
02/Sep/1971Luna 18
07/jan/1998Lunar proSpectorinto a crater to Search for water
13/juLy/1969Luna15
19/juLy/1969apoLLo 11firSt Landed on the moon 26/juLy/1971
apoLLo 15firSt Laner carried a rover
14/Sep/2007Kaguya
14/feb/1972Luna 20
20/oct/1974Luna 23
24/oct/2007chang’e1china’S firSt miSSion to the moon
27/09/2003Smart 1firSt european orbiter waS craShed into Surface
16/apr/1972apoLLo 16
09/aug/1976Luna 24
22/oct/2008chandrayaan-1
10/nov/1970Luna 17firStLunar rover
12/Sep/1970Luna 16
earth
Luna 15Luna 23
Luna 24
Luna 21Luna 2
Luna 17
Luna 18Luna 20
Luna 5Luna 9
Luna 13
Luna 8
Luna 16
hiten
Kaguya
chang’e1
ranger8
Surveyor 5
apoLLo 11apoLLo 16
ranger 9
Surveyor 7
Lunar proSpector
chandrayaan-1Lunaror orbiter 3
Lunaror orbiter 1
Lunaror orbiter 2
ranger 7
Smaruy-1
apoLLo 14apoLLo 12
apoLLo 12Surveyor 3
Lunar orbiter 5Surveyor 1
Surveyor 2Surveyor 4
Surveyor 6
apoLLo 17
apoLLo 15
38
0.774 inch
98107 103576 168709 200187
1.89 centimetreS
37
3chapter three //dealiNg with space debris
debris at higher altitudes //
one major source of debris in the past was the testing of anti-satellite weapons carried out by both the uS and Soviet union in the 60s and 70s. the norad element files only contained data for Soviet tests, and it was not until much later that debris from uS tests were identified. by the time the problem with debris was understood, widespread aSat testing had ended. the uS re-started their aSat programs in the 80s with the vought aSm-135 aSat. a 1985 test destroyed a 1 tonne satellite orbiting at 525 kilometres altitude, creating thousands of pieces of space debris larger than 1 centimetre. because it took place at relatively low altitude, atmospheric drag caused the vast majority of the large debris to decay from orbit within a decade. following the uS test in 1985, there was a de-facto moratorium on such tests. Known orbit planes of fengyun-1c debris one month after its disintegration by the chinese aSat. > china suffered widespread condem-nation after their 2007 anti-satellite missile test, both for the military implications as well as the huge amount of debris it created. this is the largest single space debris incident in history, estimated to have created more than 2, 300 pieces of trackable debris, over 35, 000 pieces 1 cm or larger, and 1 million pieces 1 mm or larger. particularly worrying is the fact that the test took place in the most densely populated part of space, as the target satellite orbited between 850 kilometres and 882 kilometres. > Since the atmospheric drag is quite low at that altitude, the debris will persist for 35 years or more. in june 2007, naSa’s terra environmental spacecraft was the first to be moved in order to prevent impacts from this debris. on 20 february 2008, the uS launched an Sm-3 missile from the uSS Lake erie specially to destroy a defective uS spy satellite feared to be carrying 1000 pounds of toxic hydrazine fuel. > Since this event occurred at about 250 km altitude, all of the resulting debris have a perigee of 250 km or lower. the mis-sile was aimed to deliberately reduce the amount of debris as much as possible, and they had decayed by early 2008. the vulnerability of satellites to a collision with larger debris and the ease of launching such an attack against a low-flying satellite, has led some to speculate that such an attack would be within the capabilities of countries unable to make a precision attack like former uS or Soviet systems. Such an attack against a large satellite of 10 tonnes or more would cause enormous damage to the Leo environment.
205115 236581 268982 326571
0.98 KiLogram 980 gram
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm42
1.181 inch
380956 432625 468748
3 centimetreS
41
in o
rder
to
mit
igat
e th
e ge
nera
tion
of
addi
tion
al s
pace
deb
ris,
a n
umbe
r of
mea
-su
res
have
bee
n pr
opos
ed. t
he p
assi
vati
on o
f sp
ent
uppe
r st
ages
by
the
rele
ase
of r
esid
ual f
uels
is a
imed
at
redu
cing
the
ris
k of
on-
orbi
t ex
plos
ions
tha
t co
uld
gene
rate
tho
usan
ds o
f ad
diti
onal
deb
ris
obje
cts.
the
pre
viou
sly
men
tion
ed c
ha-
nge
to d
elta
boo
ster
s in
the
ear
ly d
ays
of d
ebri
s ch
arac
teri
zati
on e
ssen
tial
lyel
imin
ated
the
ir f
utur
e co
ntri
buti
on.
ther
e is
no
inte
rnat
iona
l tre
aty
man
dati
ngbe
havi
or t
o m
inim
ize
spac
e de
bris
, but
the
uni
ted
nat
ions
com
mit
tee
on t
he p
ea-
cefu
l use
s of
out
er S
pace
did
pub
lish
volu
ntar
y gu
idel
ines
in 2
00
7.
as
of 2
00
8,
the
com
mit
tee
is d
iscu
ssin
g in
tern
atio
nal “
rule
s of
the
roa
d” t
o pr
even
t co
llisi
ons
betw
een
sate
llite
s. n
aS
a h
as im
plem
ente
d it
s ow
n pr
oced
ures
for
limit
ing
debr
is
prod
ucti
on a
s ha
ve s
ome
othe
r sp
ace
agen
cies
. it
is a
lrea
dy a
n it
u r
equi
rem
ent
that
geo
stat
iona
ry s
atel
lites
can
rem
ove
them
selv
es t
o a
“gra
veya
rd o
rbit
” at
the
end
of t
heir
live
s. i
t ha
s be
en d
emon
stra
ted
that
the
sel
ecte
d or
bita
l are
as d
o no
t su
ffic
ient
ly p
rote
ct g
eo
lane
s fr
om d
ebri
s, a
ltho
ugh
a re
spon
se h
as n
ot y
etbe
en f
orm
ulat
ed. t
he r
ocke
t bo
oste
rs a
nd s
ome
sate
llite
s re
tain
eno
ugh
fuel
to
allo
w t
hem
to
pow
er t
hem
selv
es in
to a
dec
ayin
g o
rbit
. in
cas
es w
hen
a di
rect
de
orbi
t w
ould
req
uire
too
muc
h fu
el,
a sa
telli
te c
an a
lso
be b
roug
ht t
o an
orb
it
whe
re a
tmos
pher
ic d
rag
wou
ld c
ause
it
to d
e-or
bit
afte
r so
me
year
s. S
uch
a m
aneu
ver
was
suc
cess
fully
per
form
ed w
ith
the
fren
ch S
pot-
1 s
atel
lite,
bri
ngin
git
s ti
me
to a
tmos
pher
ic r
e-en
try
dow
n fr
om a
pro
ject
ed 2
00
yea
rs t
o ab
out
15
year
s by
low
erin
g it
s pe
rige
e fr
om 8
30
km
to
abou
t 5
50
km
.
hu
gh
Lew
iS p
red
icte
d t
hat
th
e th
rea
t fr
om
Spa
ce
deb
riS
wo
uLd
riS
e 50
per
cen
t in
he
co
min
g d
eca
de
an
d q
ua
dr
up
Le i
n t
he
nex
t 50
yea
rS
. c
ur
ren
tLy
mo
re
tha
n 1
3, 0
00 c
LoS
e c
aLL
S a
re
tra
cKe
d w
eeKL
y.
20
09
uK
re
Se
ar
ch
er
hu
gh
Le
wiS
14000
13000
12000
11000
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Gr
ow
th
mit
iGa
tio
nS
el
f-r
em
ov
al
ex
te
rn
al
re
mo
va
l
in o
rder
to
mit
igat
e th
e ge
nera
tion
of
addi
tion
al s
pace
deb
ris,
a n
umbe
r of
mea
-su
res
have
bee
n pr
opos
ed. t
he p
assi
vati
on o
f sp
ent
uppe
r st
ages
by
the
rele
ase
of r
esid
ual f
uels
is a
imed
at
redu
cing
the
ris
k of
on-
orbi
t ex
plos
ions
tha
t co
uld
gene
rate
tho
usan
ds o
f ad
diti
onal
deb
ris
obje
cts.
the
pre
viou
sly
men
tion
ed c
ha-
nge
to d
elta
boo
ster
s in
the
ear
ly d
ays
of d
ebri
s ch
arac
teri
zati
on e
ssen
tial
lyel
imin
ated
the
ir f
utur
e co
ntri
buti
on.
ther
e is
no
inte
rnat
iona
l tre
aty
man
dati
ngbe
havi
or t
o m
inim
ize
spac
e de
bris
, but
the
uni
ted
nat
ions
com
mit
tee
on t
he p
ea-
cefu
l use
s of
out
er S
pace
did
pub
lish
volu
ntar
y gu
idel
ines
in 2
00
7.
as
of 2
00
8,
the
com
mit
tee
is d
iscu
ssin
g in
tern
atio
nal “
rule
s of
the
roa
d” t
o pr
even
t co
llisi
ons
betw
een
sate
llite
s. n
aS
a h
as im
plem
ente
d it
s ow
n pr
oced
ures
for
limit
ing
debr
is
prod
ucti
on a
s ha
ve s
ome
othe
r sp
ace
agen
cies
. it
is a
lrea
dy a
n it
u r
equi
rem
ent
that
geo
stat
iona
ry s
atel
lites
can
rem
ove
them
selv
es t
o a
“gra
veya
rd o
rbit
” at
the
end
of t
heir
live
s. i
t ha
s be
en d
emon
stra
ted
that
the
sel
ecte
d or
bita
l are
as d
o no
t su
ffic
ient
ly p
rote
ct g
eo
lane
s fr
om d
ebri
s, a
ltho
ugh
a re
spon
se h
as n
ot y
etbe
en f
orm
ulat
ed. t
he r
ocke
t bo
oste
rs a
nd s
ome
sate
llite
s re
tain
eno
ugh
fuel
to
allo
w t
hem
to
pow
er t
hem
selv
es in
to a
dec
ayin
g o
rbit
. in
cas
es w
hen
a di
rect
de
orbi
t w
ould
req
uire
too
muc
h fu
el,
a sa
telli
te c
an a
lso
be b
roug
ht t
o an
orb
it
whe
re a
tmos
pher
ic d
rag
wou
ld c
ause
it
to d
e-or
bit
afte
r so
me
year
s. S
uch
a m
aneu
ver
was
suc
cess
fully
per
form
ed w
ith
the
fren
ch S
pot-
1 s
atel
lite,
bri
ngin
git
s ti
me
to a
tmos
pher
ic r
e-en
try
dow
n fr
om a
pro
ject
ed 2
00
yea
rs t
o ab
out
15
year
s by
low
erin
g it
s pe
rige
e fr
om 8
30
km
to
abou
t 5
50
km
.
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
14000
13000
12000
11000
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
19
57
19
61
19
65
19
69
19
73
19
77
19
81
19
82
19
89
19
93
19
97
20
01
20
05
20
09
0
totaL
fragmentation debriS
miSSion-reLated debriS
SpacecraftrocKet bodieS
4443
mercury
venuS
earth
marS
jupiter
Saturn
Sun
0
50
20
10
5
2
1
diStribution of average amr vaLue for 211 fragmentS
0. 5
0. 2
0. 1
0. 05
0. 02
0. 01
0. 005
0. 002
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Space debris is becoming a growing problem. the number of non-operat-ing satellites in orbit has increased, as well as debris from spacecraft explosions and, as happened earlier this year, collisions between satel-lites. “the earth has become virtually a beehive, ” chang diaz said. “the number of satellites orbiting the earth, we’re talking hundreds of thou-sands of these objects. Some of them are just junk that’s floating there simply because these satellites have run out of fuel and they just rem-ain in orbit dead. ” the rocket, called the vaSimr for variable specific impulse magnetoplasma rocket, ” uses a high-power technology initially studied by naSa that turns argon into plasma. propelled by an exhaust gas at temperatures close to that of the sun, the vaSimr vx-200 engine would have the ability to change orbits and accelerate and decelerate in order to pick up space debris. > in September, chang diaz’s company, ad astra, tested the rocket and achieved a milestone. during the a test on in a vacuum chamber on earth, the engine cranked at just over 200 kilowatts, becoming the world’s most powerful electric rocket. vaSimr is not suitable to launch payloads from the surface of the earth due toits low thrust to weight ratio and its need of a vacuum to operate. it
would, however be an ideal to function as an upper stage for cargo, dra-stically reducing the fuel requirements for in-space transportation. ad astra has also signed an agreement with naSa to test a 200 kilowatt vaSimr engine on the international Space Station in 2013 to help keep it in orbit. iSS boosts are currently provided by conventional thrusters,which consume about 7. 5 tons of propellant per year. by cutting this amount down to 0. 3 tons, chang-diaz estimates that vaSimr could save naSa millions of dollars per year.
uranuS
neptune
pLuto
mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm46
pobblible solutions //cleaning space debris
45
487021 534765 615727
1.2 KiLogram 1200 gram
48mohawK fine paperS inc.junK Storm
the vast majority of space debris, especially smaller debris, cannot beremoved under its own power. a variety of proposals have been made todirectly remove such material from orbit. one of the most widely discus-sed solutions is the laser broom, which uses a powerful ground-based laser to ablate front surface off known debris and thereby produce a working mass that slows the debris in orbit. with a continued applicationof such thrust, the debris will eventually spiral down into a low orbit andbecome subject to atmospheric drag. the air force worked on a groundbased design under the name “project orion”. although a testbed device was slated to launch on a Space Shuttle, numerous international agree-ments for bidding testing of powerful lasers in orbit, caused the programto be limited to using the laser as a measurement device. > in the end,Space Shuttle columbia disaster led to the project being set back, andas nicholas johnson, chief Scientist and program manager for naSa’s orbital debris program office, later noted, “there are lots of little got-chas in the orion final report. there’s a reason why it’s been sitting onthe shelf for more than a decade.” another well-studied solution is to usea remotely controlled vehicle to rendezvous with debris, capture it, andreturn to a central station. > a number of other proposals intercept thedebris in a foamy ball of aerogel or even a spray of water. these wouldimpact with the debris and slow it. Some propose inflating balloons aro-und the objects in order to increase their atmospheric drag. however, it was pointed out that a balloon could be punctured by other debris, the-reby failing in its mission and actually increasing the amount of mass inorbit. in any event, the cost of launching any of these solutions is aboutthe same as launching any spacecraft. johnson has stated that none of the existing solutions are currently cost effective.
1.692 inch
687914 721579 802467
4.3 centimetreS
47
1 KiLogram
500, 000 428, 546 368, 894
2. 2 Lb Larger debriS
coverpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
00 // 00
00 // 00
04 // 05
06 // 07
08 // 09
10 // 11
12 // 13
14 // 15
16 // 17
18 // 19
20 // 21
22 // 23
24 // 25
26 // 27
endSheetpaper_ canSon coLor paper coLor_ midnight bLuephoto_none font_ none
copyright & edication paper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
tabLe of contentpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare
mohawK fine paper inc. paper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ bLacK & white font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
the concept of thiS booKpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
chapter openpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSignphoto_ none font_ qtypeSquare
hiStory of Space exLorationpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space exLorationpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space exLorationpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space exLorationpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space exLorationpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ duaL tone font_ none
chapter openpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSignphoto_ none font_ qtypeSquare
endSheet & titLe page paper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender p
production notes //
368, 894 264, 258 15, 248 10, 000
SmaLL debriS1 centimetreS 0. 39 in
28 // 29
30 // 31
32 // 33
34 // 35
36 // 37
38 // 39
40 // 41
42 // 43
44 // 45
46 // 47
48 // 49
50 // 51
52 // 00
00 // 00
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
chapter openpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSignphoto_ none font_ qtypeSquare
poSSibLe SoLutionSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
poSSibLe SoLutionSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
poSSibLe SoLutionSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
poSSibLe SoLutionSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ fuLL coLor font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
production noteSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_ none font_ bLender pro
LiSt of productS & endSheetpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4photo_none font_ none
endSheetpaper_ canSon coLor paper coLor_ midnight bLuephoto_none font_ none
Space debriSpaper_ moab entrada 190 gSm Software_ adobe indeSign cS4, adobe photoShop cS4, adobe iLLuStrator cS4photo_ none font_ qtypeSquare, bLender pro
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
///////////// //// /// /// //////////// /// // /// /////////// // /// ////////// // // /////////// //// // ///////////// ///////// /////// //
products froM Mohawk //
becKett cambric
becKett concept
becKett enhance
becKett expreSSion
becKett ridge
mohawK 50/10
mohawK bright
mohawK britehue
mohawK carnivaL
mohawK coLor copy
mohawK feLtweave
mohawK geneSiS
mohawK KnightKote
mohawK KromeKote
mohawK navajo
mohawK neKoSSa
mohawK opaque
mohawK optionS
mohawK paSSport
mohawK pegaSuS
mohawK proterra
mohawK renewaL
mohawK SKytone
mohawK SoLutionS
mohawK Superfine
mohawK Synergy
mohawK uLtrafeLt
mohawK via
Strathmore eLementS
Strathmore grandee
Strathmore paSteLLe
Strathmore writing and Script
i-tone procuteS
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
///////////// //// /// /// //////////// /// // /// /////////// // /// ////////// // // /////////// //// // ///////////// ///////// /////// //
junK Storm: the poLLution via earth to aeroSpacepubLiShed by eLSa chao-chia chung for courSe number gr 330, typography 3 &4,taught by aeriaL grey in faLL,2009 at academy of art univerSity,San franciSco, caLifornia, uSprinted and bound at eLSa chao-chia chung,887 buSh St. apt.506,San franciSco, caLifornia, uS.
aLL rightS reServed.
compiLed and deSigned by: eLSa chao-chia chungproject inStructor: aeriaL greyprinter: epSon StyLuS photo r1800font: qtypeSquare bLod, qtypeSquare reguLar, bLender pro booKpaper: moab entradar, rag bright 190 gSm© 2009 by eLSa chao-chia chung
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
///////////// //// /// /// //////////// /// // /// /////////// // /// ////////// // // /////////// //// // ///////////// ///////// /////// //