the statistics of isoplanatic angle and adaptive optics time constant derived from dimm data
DESCRIPTION
The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM data. Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine (2) (1) European Southern Observatory (2) Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. List of Themes How to find the ideal site...and keep it good?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
May 2001 Venice Workshop 1
The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant and Adaptive Optics Time Constant
derived from DIMM dataderived from DIMM data
Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine (2)
(1) European Southern Observatory(2) Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory
May 2001 Venice Workshop 2
List of List of ThemesThemes
How to find the ideal site...and keep it good?How to find the ideal site...and keep it good?
• Optical Propagation through Turbulence– Mechanical and Thermal– Index of Refraction– Signature on ground based observations– Correction methods
• Integral Monitoring Techniques– Seeing Monitoring– Scintillation Monitoring
• Profiling Techniques– Microthermal Sensors– Scintillation Ranging
• Modelling Techniques
May 2001 Venice Workshop 3
Automated DIMM OperationAutomated DIMM Operation
35cm Telescope for the 35cm Telescope for the automated DIMM at the automated DIMM at the
VLT ObservatoryVLT Observatory• Pixel size=0.7”Pixel size=0.7”• Pupil Diameter=11cm Pupil Diameter=11cm • Pupil Separation=20cm Pupil Separation=20cm • Exposure Time=5msExposure Time=5ms• 600 frames/mn600 frames/mn
May 2001 Venice Workshop 4
Fried parameter: ( meter, ^6/5)
Seeing: (arcsec, ^-0.2) 0
98.0)(r
FWHM
53
0
22
0 )()sec(2
423.0)(
dhhCr n
Optical PropagationOptical Propagation
The Signature of Atmospheric TurbulenceThe Signature of Atmospheric Turbulence
May 2001 Venice Workshop 5
53
0
22
0 )()()sec(2
91.2)( 35
dhhChv n
53
0
22
0 )()sec(2
91.2)( 35
dhhCh n
Correlation time:
Isoplanatic angle:
High Resolution ImagingHigh Resolution Imaging
May 2001 Venice Workshop 6
Statistics of Tau0Statistics of Tau0
Comparison of
wavefront velocity V0 and 200mb
wind speed during Paranal and Gemini balloon campaigns
V0 = 0.4 V200mb
May 2001 Venice Workshop 7
Statistics of Tau0Statistics of Tau0
Estimate of the coherence time
from 200mb wind velocity during Paranal and Gemini
balloon campaigns
V0fit= Max(Vground, 0.4 V200mb )
Tau0fit=0.31 r0/ V0fit
May 2001 Venice Workshop 8
Statistics of Tau0Statistics of Tau0
The error on the estimate
of the coherence time from 200mb wind velocity
increases when low level turbulence dominates (Paranal and Gemini balloon campaigns)
Hbar =0.314 r0 / Theta0
Venice Workshop 9
Statistics of Tau0 Statistics of Tau0
Geographical Location and 200mb wind velocity16 years statistics ( line:0, dash:180, tr:La Silla, dia:Paranal, sq:Mauna Kea)
May 2001 Venice Workshop 10
Statistics of tau0 Statistics of tau0
16-year average 200mb wind velocity at known observatories
(Latitude and Longitude +/- 2.5 degree)
Observatory June December mean Jun+DecChirripo (Costa Rica) 17.8 10.3 14.1 Mauna Kea 19.5 24.7 22.1Gamsberg (Nam) 32.0 20.0 26.0Paranal 34.5 22.2 28.4La Silla 36.0 27.6 31.8La Palma 24.0 42.6 33.3Maidanak (Uz) 27.1 49.6 36.4San Pedro Martir 23.0 63.3 43.2
May 2001 Venice Workshop 11
0
22
35
0 )(2
91.2 35
dhhCh n
Isoplanatic angle at zenith:
Measuring teta0 with a DIMMMeasuring teta0 with a DIMM
Scintillation index at zenith:
0
2 )()( dhhChWs n
May 2001 Venice Workshop 12
58530 cos s
Measuring teta0 with a DIMMMeasuring teta0 with a DIMM
Choose an aperture such as: 35)( hhW
and
May 2001 Venice Workshop 13
Statistics of Theta0Statistics of Theta0
Chromatic effects
Comparison of scintillation index and isoplanatic angle for Paranal
Cn2 profiles at various wavelengths
(0,4, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 micron, top to bottom)
The dispersion from the linear relation is about 5%. The chromatic error at 0.5 micron is
[+2%,-5%] from 0.4 to 0.9 micron.
May 2001 Venice Workshop 14
Statistics of Theta0Statistics of Theta0
Time Averaging Effects
True bias from 200mb wind speed for Paranal Cn2 profiles compared
to bias calculated from a single-layer model
The best agreement is obtained using half the wind velocity at 200mb. The mean correction due to time averaging was 12% in 2000 with
the 5ms Paranal DIMM
May 2001 Venice Workshop 15
Statistics of Tau0 and Theta0Statistics of Tau0 and Theta0
Statistical Distribution of the seeing at Paranal in
2000
mean r0=11.6cm
for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged
over 10mn
May 2001 Venice Workshop 16
Statistics of Tau0 Statistics of Tau0
Statistical Distribution of
the coherence time at Paranal in 2000
mean tau0=3.9ms
for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged
over 10mn
May 2001 Venice Workshop 17
Statistics of Theta0Statistics of Theta0
Statistical Distribution of the isoplanatic angle at
Paranal in 2000
mean Theta0=2.6”
for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged
over 10mn
May 2001 Venice Workshop 18
Statistics of Tau0 and Teta0Statistics of Tau0 and Teta0
Statistical Distribution of the isoplanatic angle at Paranal in 2000 for high and low wind speed at
the tropopause
The mean Theta0 increases by 10% for each 10m/s
speed decrease
The mean Tau0 is 30% larger for the best 50%
values of Theta0
May 2001 Venice Workshop 19
Statistics of tau0 and theta0Statistics of tau0 and theta0
Paranal 2000
measurements at zenith, 0.5 micron, 10mn average
Parameter best 5% best 20% 50% meanSeeing, arcsec 0.43 0.56 0.75 0.86200mb wind, m/s 12 19 29 32 Tau0, ms 8.5 5.8 3.6 3.9Theta0, arcsec 4.1 3.3 2.6 2.6