the study of wars and revolutions
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation on the study of wars and revolutions in political sciene.TRANSCRIPT
THE STUDY OF WARS AND REVOLUTIONS
Mark Sherwin Castronuevo Bayanito2008-33043
1. War1. Defining war2. History of war3. Towards a global security community?
2. Revolution1. Defining revolution2. History of ‘revolution’3. Typology4. Classic vs. modern5. Causes, stages, and strands6. States and Social Revolutions
3. Conclusion
REPORT OUTLINE
War is organized violence inter- and intra-states, designed to achieve a political goal (Reynolds) Legitimate and normal means of achieving political ends Most commonly accepted means of resolving disputes in
international politics Permanent threat of war among states
WHAT IS WAR?
War is either product of forces where states hold no control over, or consequence of militarist and aggressive policies of states Avoiding war or seeking to lessen its consequences = best
course of action Creation of League of Nations and United Nations “he who wishes peace must first prepare for war”
WHAT IS WAR?
Conflict May be carried on via
Diplomacy Economic pressures Propaganda Subversion Armed force
WHAT IS WAR?
WHAT IS WAR?
Progress of war and peace (Wright) Towards war
Tensions, military preparations, exchange of threats, mobilizations, and hostilities culminate in total conflict
Towards peace Tensions relax, budget for arms decline, disputes are settled,
trade increases, and cooperation ensues
War: a necessary evil? Protection and defence of states Preservation and promotion of their interests
Violence Rational as a means to an end A form of human action that is guided by rules, subject to
breaches more than observance Elimination of violence from human relations = elimination
of state
WHAT IS WAR?
Peace Order Monopoly of peace = monopoly of violence Surrendering of political autonomy of states to maintain
peace Tangible guarantee of state’s territorial and political
integrity
WHAT IS WAR?
Security Preservation of the state Complex set of empirical conditions and values Security of one state affects another Control over an inimical environment
International peace is a product of satisfaction of national security needs.International violence is the consequence of attaining security in an environment largely consisting of other states
Stability of government depends on its power to coerce and use force, and on its freedom from internal and external subversion.
WHAT IS WAR?
Power-security hypothesis Threats to security based on relative military capacities of
states Violation of territorial integrity of other states
One’s security is the insecurity of the other Balance of power
WHAT IS WAR FOR?
Civilized war War as an “institution conducted by a specialized class for
purposes of plunder, territorial acquisition, trade, or expansion of religion or ideology” (Wright)
Merging of “heroic age” and “time of troubles” Large-scale conquest Ideological, economic, psychological, political, and juridical
causes
HISTORY OF WAR
Modern war Use of gunpowder Continued exploration and exploitation of discovered
territories Concept of state sovereignty Military power as basis of political authority Ideology became less important than political imperialism
and nationalism Necessary war justifications in propaganda
Balance of power Independence from colonization Nationality White man’s burden
HISTORY OF WAR
Recent War Technological innovations Communism Revolutions Colonial self-determinism Legal-political claims of territory Cold War
HISTORY OF WAR
United Nations Charter Members obliged
To settle international disputes by peaceful means where international peace and security, and justice are not endangered
To refrain from threatening the territorial integrity or political independence of a state
To refrain from providing aid to any state which UN is taking preventive or enforcement action
War outlawed in charter; hostilities remain possible
“THE OUTLAWRY OF WAR” (WRIGHT)
Absence of war in democracies Pluralistic security community (Karl Deutsch) The future will only be less war-prone if democratization
persists among non-democratic states Integration and disintegration between political
communities Increasing global dependence
TOWARDS A GLOBAL SECURITY COMMUNITY? (EBERWEIN)
Wide range of activities that result in illegal or radical changes in government
Deep-seated social change Alterations in the political fabric Consummated through violence Accompanied by production of ideology
WHAT IS REVOLUTION?
Invention of Writing in Ancient Egypt Records of humans killed in internal wars and rebellions Social upheaval or rebellion as sacrilege against the
reigning monarch and their ‘divine right’ Revolution as replacement of the weak ruler by a strong
ruler, who is seen to be favored by the gods to overthrow the former in war
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Greeks Revolution as embodying:
Change of rulers implied in revolt Social displacement due to rise of (new) aristocracy or fall of
(exclusive) aristocracy Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War
Revolution as rapid change accompanied by violence Stasis or dissolution of state => overhaul of basic social relationships
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Greeks Aristotle’s The Politics (Book V)
Metabole or political change Complete change from one constitution to another, or modification of existing
constitution States founded on erroneous ideas of justice, leading to discontent and
upheaval Revolution necessary for political change
Both violent and non-violent By force and by fraud Leading to alteration or displacement of social groups
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Greeks Aristotle’s The Politics (Book V)
Inequality as prime cause of revolution Different forms of inequalities in different states
“Revolutions break out when opposite parties, e.g. the rich and the poor, are equally balanced and there is little or nothing between them; for, if either party were manifestly superior, the other world will not risk an attack on them.”
Revolutions as causing subsequent development rather than decay
Revolution as a political rather than a social concept Affects rule and authority within states Affects social composition and ordering of rank within the state
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Italian City-States Rivoluzioni
origin of contemporary political usage Changes of power = changes of alliances Occurring when planets reach major conjunctions
Rotation of celestial bodies following natural inexorable laws (Copernicus, 1543)
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Italian City-States Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince
Overthrown rulers were either Unable to strengthen military power Unable to keep people’s allegiance
Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Livy state decay due to loss of “original goodness”
Ambitions of individual citizens or rival tyrants regimes overthrown frequently without bloodshed
Violent overthrow of regimes due to motive of revenge, rather than ambition Reestablishment of concept of revolution as political
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
French Revolution of 1789 Democratic concept of revolution Inefficiency of ancien régime Revolution as replacement by new and more rational
government Government representing the people
Revolution as an end in itself Jean-Jacques Rosseau’s concept of ‘general will’
A social rather than a political revolution? Political consequences were undesirable (Calvert)
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Marx and Engels Revolution is inevitable
Socialist revolution as the final revolution Historical development => emergence of proletariat class, to
destroy ‘political class’ or bourgeoisie => overthrow of ‘capitalist’ state => establishment of new and permanent government
October Revolution in Russia, 1917 Lenin’s State and Revolution (1917)
Justification of the October Revolution as a Proletariat Revolution Justification of the Soviets as the dictatorship of the Proletariat Achievement of a post-revolutionary society
Proletariat class was not primary movers in the revolution
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
Vilfredo Pareto’s elite theory Long-term elite monopoly of power as cause of revolution Revolution as violent means of replacing ruling elite by rival
Sorel’s Reflections on Violence (1908) Myth of revolutionary success as sine qua non of that
success Formula for revolution need not to be real, but must be believed
by its followersMussolini’s March on Rome in 1922
Manipulation of government through an illusion of overwhelming power Seizure of legitimacy and state control through implied rather
than visible force
HISTORY OF ‘REVOLUTION’
1. Jacquerie Mass peasant uprising
2. Millenarian Rebellion Jacquerie + charismatic leadership
3. Anarchistic Rebellion Restoration attempt to an already shattered society
E.g., Vendée Rebellion (1793-1796)4. Jacobin-Communist Revolution
Spontaneous social revolution E.g., French Revolution (1789), Russian Revolution (
5. Conspiratorial Coup d’État6. Militarized Mass Insurrection
Calculated nationalist and social revolutions China (1937-1949), Algeria (1954-1962), North Vietnam (1945-1954)
TYPES OF REVOLUTIONS (JOHNSON)
Classic revolutions: French and Russian Existence of an ancien régime Middle-class affairs Widespread discontent, frustration, and alienation Violence and terror Emergence of ‘proper leadership’
Quick hold to power “initial frenzied effort to overhaul the whole fabric of society”
(Leiden and Schmitt) Thermidor
retreat from more radical goals and strategies during revolution, caused by replacement of leaders
Overthrow of Maximilien Robespierre and his followers “convalescence from the fever of revolution” (Brinton)
CLASSIC VS. MODERN REVOLUTIONS
Modern Revolutions Latin America and Middle East Coups d’état Violent upheavals Limited political revolt
Primacy of the military In ‘underdeveloped’ countries
Impact of technology and globalization
CLASSIC VS. MODERN REVOLUTIONS
1. Foreign control2. Economic conditions3. Political disputes4. Defects in the regime5. Disruption of the incumbent power structure
CAUSES OF REVOLUTION (LEIDEN AND SCHMITT)
Birth of revolution (Outbreak) Actual or implied violence
Protracted political struggle leading to armed conflict Sudden uprising of a small group to immediately seize state
power (coup d’état) Outburst of armed violence by massed forces or small group of
guerilla fighters Triggering element necessary
Revolutionary leaders (agitators, organizers, etc.) Natural or man-made catastrophes Reforms and improvements of incumbent government
Revolutionary situation does not necessarily lead to revolution (Laqueur)
STAGES OF REVOLUTION (LEIDEN AND SCHMITT; LAQUEUR)
Deconstruction (Radical phase) Annihilation of certain features of incumbent regime Replacement
Construction Return to stability and acceptance Ideology to justify revolution
STAGES OF REVOLUTION (LEIDEN AND SCHMITT; LAQUEUR)
Economic Revolution as a social phenomenon caused by economic
factors Marx – results from increasing misery De Tocqueville – results from increasing prosperity Davies’ ‘J-curve’ – period of increasing prosperity culminating in
inability of government to accommodate increasing demands Revolution of rising expectations
Social Revolution arises from society’s failure to meet demands
Multiple dysfunctions in society “accelerators” of revolt
STRANDS OF PRESENT-DAY CONCEPTION (CALVERT)
Psychological Based on individual’s alienation from society Talcott Parsons’ theory of social action and Robert Merton’s
theory of social groups Concept of revolution compatible with behavioral
psychology and behavioral analysisPolitical
Aristotle, Machiavelli, Locke Revolution as displacement of political power Without this view, other aspects of change will not be
distinguishable as ‘revolutionary’ (Calvert) Revolution is an impious defiance of the will of the state or
of the people, and hence contrary to the proper order of things
STRANDS OF PRESENT-DAY CONCEPTION (CALVERT)
Most theories of revolution account only for direct action
Social revolution Fast-paced foundational transformations of state and social
structures Two stages:
Crisis of state Poor economy, natural disasters, food shortage, security issues
Emergence of dominant classMain causes of social unrest
State social structures International competitive pressures International demonstrations Class relations
STATES AND SOCIAL REVOLUTIONS (SKOCPOL)
War is not equal to revolution War is towards a political goal of the state, usually against
another state In the realm of international relations
Revolution is towards a radical change within the stateWar as precursor to revolution
Huge material and economic losses in aftermath Access to arms and less priority to human life Disintegration and dissatisfaction upon defeat
CONCLUSION
“He who wishes peace must first prepare for war” The goal of attaining security poses insecurity on other
states, thus posing a threat of war Even though outlawed, there is no end to the possibility
of war State sovereignty Balance of power Technological innovation Arms race International disputes
CONCLUSION
War is primarily a political phenomenon Revolution may have other aspects but its political
aspect still remains important Change in government affects social order
The necessity and importance of violence in both wars and revolutions seems to be depreciating Cold War Bloodless revolutions
Globalization and technological innovations will either heat up or cool down the occurrence of wars and revolutions
CONCLUSION
Brinton, Crane. The Anatomy of Revolution . New York: Prentice-Hall , Inc. 1965
Calvert, Peter. Revolution . New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter. “The Future of International Warfare: Toward a
Global Security Community?”. International Polit ical Science Review , vol . 16 no. 4, Dangers of Our Time (Oct. 1995), pp. 341-360.
Laqueur, Walter. “Revolution”. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences , vol. 13, pp. 501-507.
Leiden, Carl , and Karl M. Schmitt. The Polit ics of Violence: Revolution in the Modern World . New Jersey: Prentice-Hal l , Inc. , 1968.
Neumann, Sigmund. “The International Civi l War”. World Polit ics , vol. 1 (1949), pp. 335-336.
Reynolds, Charles. The Pol it ics of War: A study of the rational ity of violence in inter-state relations . New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989.
Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Wright, Quincy. A Study of War . Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1942
BIBLIOGRAPHY