the sxr instrument

30
Michael Rowen LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected] .edu November 12, 2008 The SXR Instrument The SXR is a instrument for Soft X-ray Materials Research on the LCLS SXR is the second soft x-ray instrument at the LCLS SXR is compatible with multiple techniques for studying materials with ultra short soft x-rays pulses SXR spans both hutches 1 & 2 with the end station in Hutch 2 SXR compliments the AMO experiment Michael Rowen Project Engineer

Upload: aya

Post on 20-Feb-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

The SXR Instrument. The SXR is a instrument for Soft X-ray Materials Research on the LCLS SXR is the second soft x-ray instrument at the LCLS SXR is compatible with multiple techniques for studying materials with ultra short soft x-rays pulses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

The SXR Instrument

The SXR is a instrument for Soft X-ray Materials Research on the LCLS

SXR is the second soft x-ray instrument at the LCLS SXR is compatible with multiple techniques for studying

materials with ultra short soft x-rays pulsesSXR spans both hutches 1 & 2 with the end station in Hutch 2SXR compliments the AMO experiment

Michael RowenProject Engineer

Page 2: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Scientific Drivers for SXR

X-Ray Scattering Spectroscopy on Strongly Correlated Materials Pump-Probe Ultrafast ChemistryMagnetic Imaging Ultrafast Coherent Imaging

Page 3: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Science Driven Requirements Soft X-ray Beam Line, 500*-2000eV:

Monochromatic, E/E of ~5000Focused or unfocused beam at end stationSwitch between monochromatic and “white” beam without moving experimental systemOpen end station for interchangeable user systemsCapabilities for fast, single shot, transmission spectroscopy

* LCLS operations will be at photon energies >825eV in the near term.

Page 4: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR Beam LineMajor Components:

MonochromatorExit slitFocusing OpticsNo fixed end stationTransmission sample chamber (up stream of mono)Spectrometer detector (insertable, at exit slit)

Page 5: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR Layout

Basic AMO & SXR layout in hutches 1 & 2

Page 6: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Grating Monochromator

Varied Line Spacing (VLS) grating monochromator:

2 optical elements (vertically deflecting): spherical mirror, VLS plane gratingEnergy scan by rotation of gratingErect focal plane for spectrometer mode and fixed slit position.B4C coated optics

Courtesy Phil Heimann

Page 7: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Monochromator Layout

M1 Mirror & Grating Exit SlitMonochromator spans the first and second hutches

Page 8: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Resolution vs Energy100 l/mm grating

At 800 eV E = 0.19 eV At 1200 eV E = 0.23 eV

Resolution goal of 0.2 eV at 1000 eV is achieved.

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

Res

olut

ion

(eV

)

140012001000800600Photon energy (eV)

Source M1 Mirror 100 l/mm Grating Total

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

Res

olut

ion

(eV

)

200018001600140012001000800Photon energy (eV)

Source M1 Mirror 200 l/mm Grating Total

200 l/mm grating

Page 9: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Optical tolerances

The figure tolerances are difficult because we need to preserve the brightness of a source 100 m in diameter and at a 100 m distance.

That accuracy has been achieved by two venders for the LCLS SOMS and HOMS mirrors.

Page 10: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Grating efficiency

Grating efficiency calculations with Gsolver by Phil Heimann.

Grating frequen

cy (1/mm)

Groove depth (nm)

Groove width (m)

100 28 7.2200 13 2.95

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

Effic

ienc

y

5 6 7 8 91000

2

Photon energy (eV)

100 l/mm 200 l/mm

Page 11: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Fourier optics simulations

From Jacek Krzywinski

At the exit slit. Assuming 2 nm

rms figure error.

Page 12: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Fourier optics simulations (cont.)

At the focus in end station.

Assuming 2 nm rms figure error.

Y profile

X profile

Page 13: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Behind the focus (10 cm)

When the focus of the KB mirrors are not at the sample, there is more structure in the beam.

The peak intensity is still reduced, here by ~1/100.

Page 14: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Pulse duration preservation

Pulse stretching: N m = 40 fs at 826 eV (i.e. at high dispersion)

An adjustable aperture near grating can be used to reduce pulse stretching with a decreased intensity and energy resolution.

For dispersive measurements and white beam, LCLS pulse duration is unaffected.

Page 15: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Focusing Optics

K-B Optics:Silicon Substrates Profiled mirrors bent to elliptical cylinders Focus to <10x10m B4C coatings Un-bend one or both mirrors for line or unfocused beam

Page 16: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

K-B Refocusing Mirrors

K-B Mirrors Focus End Station <10x10 m

Page 17: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

ALS “standard” monochromator: 0.1 rad motion of pre-mirror and grating, Horizontal translation of chamber.

Use ALS beamline mechanical designs

ALS bendable mirror: Motorized leaf springs, Flange mounted.

Plan to use existing mechanical designs with minimal modifications in the LCLS SXR Instrument.

Page 18: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Optical Design Review 7/15/08Committee

Peter Stefan (SLAC) chair, Alistair MacDowell (ALS), Rolf Follath (BESSY)

General comments“Overall, the review committee felt that the optical design presented is good, and will likely work. The assembled SXR design team has good experience in this area and a good ‘track record.’ Also, the damage issues seemed properly considered.”

Specific recommendationsBecause of the as-coated density of B4C, the mirror incidence angles were changed 15 -> 14 mrad.The Fourier optics calculations were repeated with the correct orientation between the offset mirrors and the monochromator.

Page 19: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Spectrometer Mode

Transmission Sample Location Spectrometer Detector at Exit Slit

Page 20: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

PM1

PM2C

3/2-1

PM3

Harmonics C1

C2

C4

C5

PM4VEC

To Experiment

PM5

To Experiment2VEC

/2-3

/2-4

Lase

r

/2-2

SpectrometerCsp

Oscillator Controls

PMOsc

F1

F2 Laser HallHutch 2

AC

L1L2

L3

L4

L5

M3M4

M1M2

Oscope

Pump Laser SystemReplicate system from AMO

Courtesy Greg Hays

Page 21: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR / AMO Interfaces

AMO & SXR engineers are working closely to resolve all conflicts as the are identified.

Space is tracked Systems checked for compatibility Ideas and designs are shared (i.e. mostly stolen from

AMO and LUSI) Operational boundaries have been defined

Page 22: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Space between instruments is closely tracked

Minimize diameter SXR beam pipe

Clears AMO instrumentation

Page 23: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

AMO K-B optics and SXR Mono being designed by the same engineer

Space for extension AMO into 2nd HutchRack space is apportioned

Page 24: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

OperationsOperations on the SXR beam line requires installation of the monochromator which is scheduled for installation winter shutdown ’09-‘10.

Initial operational mode: No access to hutches with beam, i.e. no access to Hutch 1 when AMO is running. (July –Dec ‘09)

Intermediate operational mode: No access to hutches with active experiments. Access to hutches with beam passing through. (as soon after start of SXR operations as possible, ~Mar ‘10)

Final operational mode: Access to hutches with active soft x-ray experiments, Hutch 1 or Hutch 2.

SXR is working with Radiation Physics on defining and building in the necessary shielding and controls for access soon after SXR operations start.

Operations with samples in the transmission chamber (Hutch 1) for spectrograph mode will require additional approvals, testing and implementation of a shielding plan.

Page 25: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Endstations

Nilsson Hussein-Shen

ChapmanStöhr

8 Endstations described in the TDR document

Page 26: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Institutional Roles

Institution Role Support level (k$)

StanfordInitial support for conceptual design (TDR)Purchase long lead optical componentsEngineering and design

750

LBNLX-ray optical design and on going technical supportEngineering and design of X-ray optical systems

380

DESYProvides hardware and support for assembly Technical expertise FEL instrumentation

1500

CFEL Provides hardware and support for assembly 300

LCLS Provides overall management structure, pays for installation and integration, will manage operations 1517

$4447kTotal estimated cost:

Page 27: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR Status The SXR scientific case has been reviewed by SAC. Technical Design Report (TDR) has been written and

accepted. LCLS has reviewed the project for compatibility. The X-ray optical design has been reviewed. The base MoU is signed. Integration of SXR into the LCLS construction project has

started. Proposals for Long lead optical components are coming in

and the first contracts have been placed.

Page 28: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

Status of MoU

The MoU between SLAC and DESY has been signed by DESY and SLAC.

The technical addendum defining contributions and roles of the members of the consortium is in final draft and should be completed by ??.

Page 29: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR ScheduleSXR is just starting to be integrated into the LCLS schedule. These completion dates are the earliest possible dates. Expected final installations are in Dec ’09/Jan ’10.

Page 30: The SXR Instrument

Michael Rowen

LCLS FAC Meeting [email protected]

November 12, 2008

SXR Instrument team Anders Nilsson (Stanford) & Wilfried Wurth (Hamburg): consortium leaders Phil Heimann & Nicholas Kelez (ALS): monochromator and KB optics Yves Acremann (Stanford) & Alexander Foehlisch (Hamburg): diagnostics

and with Bill White & Greg Hays (LCLS) laser beam delivery Stefan Moeller (LCLS): LCLS contact Gunther Haller, Perry Anthony, Dave Nelson (SLAC): controls Amedeo Perazzo, Chris O’Grady & Remi Machet: data acquisition Jacek Krzywinski (LCLS): fourier optics simulations Regina Soufli (LLNL): optical coatings Michael Rowen* (LCLS/SLAC) : overall beam line systems, budget,

schedule, interfaces

*Only full-time person.