the toxics use reduction act in massachusetts: a successful model in toxics substitution and...

28
The Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts: A Successful Model in Toxics Substitution and Reduction Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production November 24, 2003

Upload: caitlin-watkins

Post on 31-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts: A Successful

Model in Toxics Substitution and Reduction

The Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts: A Successful

Model in Toxics Substitution and Reduction

Joel A. Tickner, ScD

Lowell Center for Sustainable Production

November 24, 2003

Joel A. Tickner, ScD

Lowell Center for Sustainable Production

November 24, 2003

Summary Summary

TUR Provides a successful model for chemicals management that includes understanding how chemicals are used and ways to reduce use/waste in the first place

TUR is a particularly useful technique for downstream users

There are many lessons from TUR that could inform the emerging EU system

TUR Provides a successful model for chemicals management that includes understanding how chemicals are used and ways to reduce use/waste in the first place

TUR is a particularly useful technique for downstream users

There are many lessons from TUR that could inform the emerging EU system

Evolution of Pollution Prevention in the US and TUREvolution of Pollution Prevention in the US and TUR

1986 OTA Report – Serious Reduction of Hazardous Waste

1990 Pollution Prevention Act State Programs

• Toxics Use Reduction Act of 1989

Federal and International Programs

1986 OTA Report – Serious Reduction of Hazardous Waste

1990 Pollution Prevention Act State Programs

• Toxics Use Reduction Act of 1989

Federal and International Programs

Goals of TUR

50% reduction in the generation of toxic by-products by 1997 through TUR

Establish TUR as the preferred means of regulatory compliance

Sustain and promote the competitive position of Massachusetts industry

Promote reduction in the production of toxic and hazardous substances

Enhance and coordinate state agency enforcement of environmental laws

What is TUR Toxics Use Reduction?

Toxics Use Reduction Act Definition: In-plant changes in production processes or raw materials that reduce, avoid, or eliminate the use of toxic or hazardous substances or generation of hazardous byproducts per unit of product, so as to reduce risks to the health of workers, consumers, or the environment, with out shifting risks betweenworkers, consumers, or the environment. TUR shall be achieved through any of the six defined techniques.

Definition of TUR: Key Points

In-plant changes that reduce, avoid, or eliminate the use of toxic or hazardous substances or

generation of hazardous byproducts Per unit of product Reduce overall risks to workers, consumers, and the environment Without shifting risks Through TUR techniques

The Six TUR TechniquesThe Six TUR Techniques

1. Input substitution

2. Product reformulation or redesign

3. Equipment or technology modernizations

4. Process or procedure modifications

5. Improvements in housekeeping, maintenance, training, or inventory control

6. In-process recycling

1. Input substitution

2. Product reformulation or redesign

3. Equipment or technology modernizations

4. Process or procedure modifications

5. Improvements in housekeeping, maintenance, training, or inventory control

6. In-process recycling

Planning and Accounting Process

Regulations define content, not process TUR concentrates on planning:

• Process Characterization• Process mapping• Materials accounting

• Options generation/screening• Technical/financial analysis• Implementation

TUR should become center-piece of regulatory structure

Listed ChemicalsListed Chemicals

Several government lists accounting for about 1000 chemicals (Toxics Release Inventory, CERCLA)

Chemicals on list because of some hazard they pose (chronic, acute, etc.)

Companies to file based on using chemical not risk

About 170 Chemicals actually reported About 560 Companies reach thresholds

Several government lists accounting for about 1000 chemicals (Toxics Release Inventory, CERCLA)

Chemicals on list because of some hazard they pose (chronic, acute, etc.)

Companies to file based on using chemical not risk

About 170 Chemicals actually reported About 560 Companies reach thresholds

The Heart of Planning

Compile data for current materials use, toxics use, production processes• Serves as base-line for all future TUR possibilities• Provides comprehensive view of current work practices – why

chemicals being used and how• Indicates areas of high toxics use, or inefficiency• Identifies opportunities and options• Involves employees in all aspects of facility

TUR Planning ProcessTUR Planning Process

Planning cycle when viewed as a continually improving

Planning cycle when viewed as a continually improving

Implement

Evaluate

Review

Continual Improvement…

Modify

Evaluate

ReviewPlan

(year 0)

Update (year 2)

Plan Contents – Facility-Wide Info

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Management Policy Statement•Mission statement to clarify philosophy

•and commitment to TUR and P2 initiatives

Plan Scope•Summary of Universe ID process

•Summary of TUR to be implemented

•Description of Production Units

•List of chemicals

Employee Notification•Six months prior to Planning (January 1)

•Informs employees and requests input

Plan Contents – Process CharacterizationPlan Contents – Process Characterization

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Process Mapping• Visual representation of production units

• Show where chemicals enter and leave

Process

Calculate costs of toxics

Material Balance• Determine amounts of toxic used

• Determine amount of by-product

Plan Contents – Options ID

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Identify the universe of TUR options• ID all techniques for potentially achieving

toxics use reduction

• METHODS: Brainstorming techniques,

vendor info, trade associations

Plan Contents – Options EvaluationPlan Contents – Options Evaluation

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Screen the universe • Determine and eliminate options that

are clearly technically or economically

infeasible

Detailed evaluation• Technical evaluation

• Economic evaluation

•Health Safety and Environmental Evaluation

•Tools and support to complete

Develop implementation schedule• Determine timeline for implementation

• Project toxics use reduction 2 and 5

years into the future

Plan Contents – Plan DevelopmentPlan Contents – Plan Development

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Document all aspects of the Plan or

Plan Update• Keep plan on site – do not submit to DEP

Submit Plan or Update summary • Certification statement

• Projected changes in toxics usage

• Projected byproduct reduction

• Types of TUR techniques

• Other useful info for public review

•Public available information

Plan Contents - CertificationPlan Contents - Certification

Pre-Plan

ProcessCharacterization

Identify TUROptions

ImplementPlan

MeasureSuccess

Certify Plan

Develop orUpdate Plan

Screen & Evaluate TUR

Options

Plan must be certified by:• DEP Certified TUR Planner

• Senior Plant Manager

8

TURA Program Agencies Bureau of Waste Prevention, DEP

• Implementation/enforcement Office of Technical Assistance

• Voluntary technical assistance - engineering Toxics Use Reduction Institute Funded by fee on chemicals use

Administrative Council

Bureauof Waste

Prevention

Toxics UseReductionInstitute

Office ofTechnicalAssistance

ScienceAdvisory

Board

11

Toxics Use Reduction Institute

Develops and delivers a curriculum for TUR Planners Sponsors and conducts research into technologies,

methods, and policies which decrease risk to the environment and human health• ie Surface Solutions Laboratory

Provide technical support and technology transfer to industry, government and the public – stakeholder engagement

Provide information on TUR to all education levels Assist in training inspectors and other key toxics personnel Library of toxics use reduction information/databases

website www.turi.org

New DirectionsNew Directions

Priority User Segments PBTs High Hazard Chemicals Environmental Stewardship – Blue Ribbon

Panel Supply chain collaboratives Community based initiatives Toxics in everyday products

Priority User Segments PBTs High Hazard Chemicals Environmental Stewardship – Blue Ribbon

Panel Supply chain collaboratives Community based initiatives Toxics in everyday products

Results of Toxics Use ReductionResults of Toxics Use Reduction

Results: 1990-2000

• 60% reduction in waste

• 40% reduction in use

• 80% reduction in emissions Benefits to industry $15 million (not

considering health/environmental benefits)

Helps that state is a chemical using one

Results: 1990-2000

• 60% reduction in waste

• 40% reduction in use

• 80% reduction in emissions Benefits to industry $15 million (not

considering health/environmental benefits)

Helps that state is a chemical using one

Did We Achieve the Goals?

Lessons Learned – Information NeedsLessons Learned – Information Needs Need for good process/facility level materials

accounting information• Materials not efficiently managed (what you can’t

measure you can’t manage)

• Identifies opportunities for greater efficiency

• Provides a more holistic view

• Protection of CBI generally not requested

Need good metrics to measure progress Need good information on alternatives to problem

substances REACH currently focuses on only toxicity

information (and some use) – materials flow data would enhance supply chain understanding

Need for good process/facility level materials accounting information• Materials not efficiently managed (what you can’t

measure you can’t manage)

• Identifies opportunities for greater efficiency

• Provides a more holistic view

• Protection of CBI generally not requested

Need good metrics to measure progress Need good information on alternatives to problem

substances REACH currently focuses on only toxicity

information (and some use) – materials flow data would enhance supply chain understanding

Lessons Learned – Planning NeedsLessons Learned – Planning Needs Particularly important for downstream users as a

framework to consider means to reduce/eliminate problem chemical use through efficiency and substitution measures – focus on service of chemical

Engages wide range of actors in decision process

Considers whole process/facility hazards Chemical substitution often means process

change• Consideration of product quality/economics

• Consideration of health and safety trade-offs

Substitution/prevention planning with clear guidance would be important under REACH

Particularly important for downstream users as a framework to consider means to reduce/eliminate problem chemical use through efficiency and substitution measures – focus on service of chemical

Engages wide range of actors in decision process

Considers whole process/facility hazards Chemical substitution often means process

change• Consideration of product quality/economics

• Consideration of health and safety trade-offs

Substitution/prevention planning with clear guidance would be important under REACH

Lessons Learned - InnovationLessons Learned - Innovation Innovation requires both willingness AND

capacity Technical support has been critical for industry

innovation • Demonstration projects/sites

• Networking of firms

• Research support

• Technical assistance to firms

• Success brings more interest/successes

Recognition of leaders through Governors’ awards

Failure to consider could lead to disjointed REACH implementation

Innovation requires both willingness AND capacity

Technical support has been critical for industry innovation • Demonstration projects/sites

• Networking of firms

• Research support

• Technical assistance to firms

• Success brings more interest/successes

Recognition of leaders through Governors’ awards

Failure to consider could lead to disjointed REACH implementation

Conclusion: Lessons from Toxics Use ReductionConclusion: Lessons from Toxics Use Reduction

Have Ambitious Goals Metrics and planning are critical to prevention

– understanding how materials are used and options for reduction

REACH should encourage firms to consider implications of chemical substitutions

Support research and technical assistance for innovation

Using a multitude of tools to achieve goals of REACH

Have Ambitious Goals Metrics and planning are critical to prevention

– understanding how materials are used and options for reduction

REACH should encourage firms to consider implications of chemical substitutions

Support research and technical assistance for innovation

Using a multitude of tools to achieve goals of REACH