the transfer cohort program
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
1/27
ARP 611 with Kendra Jeffcoat, Ph.D.
The Transfer Cohort Programat San Diego City CollegeBringing Learning Communities to All of SDCCs students
Matt Cromwell
12/7/2010
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
2/27
Page 1 of 14
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ..................................................................................................... page 2II. The Need for the Transfer Cohort Program (TCP) .............................................. page 2III. Summary of Proposal to Address the Need ....................................................... page 4IV. Implementation Strategy .................................................................................. page 8V. Common Faculty Questions and/or Concerns ................................................... page 13
BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... page 14
AppendixA. Sample Cohort SyllabusB. Implementation Sequence MapC. TCP Summary HandoutD. Learning Community ApplicationE. Sample Student EvaluationF. Sample Master Learner EvaluationG. SDCC Student Success Pathways
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
3/27
Page 2 of 14
I. INTRODUCTIONSan Diego City College currently has a wide variety of Learning Communities to address a
wide variety of incoming student needs. These range from the famous PUENTE program, for Latino
students; the Umoja, for African-American students; CityLinks, Latino students who need remedial
studies and cultural orientation; to the New Horizons, for students seeking a new vocational
direction and are in financial need; and First Year Experience programs. All of these programs are
targeted to a unique demographic.
These programs are excellent examples of using the Learning Community model to effectively
address incoming students needs. This proposal stands on the shoulders of the successes of these
programs and recommends that SDCC extend the Learning Community model to all students.
Learning Communities can benefit students of every background and with every educational goal.
This proposal will illustrate the specific benefits that a shift towards a broader cohort oriented
curriculum can have for students seeking General Education requirements for transfer to a UC or
State University. This proposal is also unique from the existing programs in introducing the Master
Learner model within each learning community.
II. THE NEED FOR THE TRANSFER COHORT PROGRAM (TCP)There are three concerns that are nearly universal in community colleges in the United States:
(1) Persistence of its students between semesters; (2) The rate at which students transfer to 4-year
institutions; (3) The quality of the education the institution provides. San Diego City College (SDCC)
shares each of these concerns. This proposal will enhance and improve each of those areas.
Persistence is a national concern. A recent report from the Center for Community College
Student Engagement links low persistence and completion rates with a less qualified national work-
force with the consequence of having more and more American jobs being exported to other more
highly trained countries (Center For Community College Student Engagement, 2010). According to
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
4/27
Page 3 of 14
the 2010 SDCC Fact Book, SDCC has increased its persistence rate by 5 percent from 2005 to 2009.
But when that is compared to the district average of 11% it is clear that we are falling behind. In
contrast, this years Accreditation Self-Study claims that recent successes in Latino student
persistence (91%) can be directly linked to the cluster of classes or Learning Communities at the
colleges that focus on student transfer goal. Where there is success in one program, especially at
the rate of 91%, there should be efforts to implement that programs strengths to the broader
institution and student base. A concerted effort to improve our persistence numbers is more than
called for.
SDCC, as one of the three San Diego Community College District schools, was included in the
Districts 2010 Transfer Report (Office of Institutional Research and Planning, 2010). The report
details both the sheer volume of potential transfer students (Transfer Volume) as well as tracking
three different specific cohorts of students (Transfer Rate) from 2001 until spring of 2009. Whereas
both Mesa Community College and Miramar Community College saw a consistent rise in both
volume and rate, SDCC alone saw a decline in transfer rate. There may be some mitigating
circumstances around the reporting of the numbers, but the fact that the other two schools clearly
increased where SDCC decreased cannot be taken lightly. The report defines Transfer Rate as the
demographic of first-time students who completed 12 units in a six year period and who
attempted a degree, certificate, or transfer course (3). A decline in this demographic then indicates
that persistence alone is not enough to have an excellent rate of transfer.
Lastly, every educational institution, in order to stay viable, is concerned with its academic
quality. SDCC has taken every effort to hire high quality faculty and is firmly accredited with WASC.
But these are not the only avenues for achieving academic excellence. Studies have shown that a
students experience directly affects their ability to excel in learning. Vincent Tinto conducted a
survey in which students at various Community Colleges in various different learning communities
reported on the impact the learning communities had on their learning experience. Tinto
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
5/27
Page 4 of 14
summarizes the results, saying that 1) students spent more time studying outside of class together
than non-learning community students; 2) students were more actively involved in their learning
both inside and outside of the classroom; 3) students felt an increased quality to their learning
while in learning communities; and most importantly 4) because students saw themselves as more
engaged with studies and friends they tended to persevere longer in their programs than non-
learning community students (Tinto, 2003). If these are some of the benefits of learning
communities, why should this be limited only to special and unique demographics of higher-need
students? It should not.
A learning community designed for our student base, and not just those with unique needs or
specific demographics, is one sure way to improve SDCCs academic excellence, persistence, and the
successful transfer of our students to 4-year universities.
III. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL TO ADDRESS THE NEEDThe Transfer Cohort Program (TCP) emphasizes learning communities that walk students
through 2 years of their community college experience by combining IGETC approved lower-
division General Education classes. Each learning community is assigned a Master Learner (ML) to
promote cohesion and keep students on track, encourage one another to excel, and dialogue about
integrating the class topics and content as well as each others area of study.
Modular Cohortsare two General Education classes paired together because of their
complimentary subject matters (see page 2 of Appendix C). In some cases classes are paired in
order to give students a balanced workload. Rather than overloading students with too much
mathematics, or philosophy, subjects are paired for diversity, like Humanities classes being paired
with Science or Mathematics. Other cohorts are paired because they are directly correlative, such as
World History and English Literature. Cohorts are modular in that students will have different
colleagues in each cohort. This is for the purpose of allowing students of all educational situation to
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
6/27
Page 5 of 14
be able to jump in to the TCP whenever it becomes applicable for them and they meet the
prerequisites of the specific classes in that cohort.
Master Learnerssit in each of the cohort classes and participate in the learning alongside the
students in the cohort. MLs also lead discussion during cohort sessions (see below), provide
feedback on assignments, study and personal discipline tips, and coaching for registration and
preparation for transfer. There are two options for where these MLs will come from. (1) The
original Master Learner model comes from The Community College of Baltimore County (McPhail,
McKusick, & Starr, 2006). The Baltimore model asked fellow faculty members to serve as MLs on a
per semester basis. This enabled the faculty to more actively engage with students, as well as to
provide a peer review for the teaching faculty. Faculty would, in this case, be relieved of one or two
of their teaching classes in order to serve as an ML. This model requires a heavy degree of buy-in
from the faculty in order to happen successfully. If faculty were invested deeply enough, then a core
group of rotating MLs could form and provide the most constructive feedback of the program and
suggestions for refinement.
Using faculty as MLs means no additional costs to consider, unless the disruption of having a
particular faculty member unavailable for one semester means having to hire more adjunct faculty.
In that case the cost would then need to be compared with option 2. (2) MLs could be interns from
San Diego State University. Preliminary ad hoc surveying of current graduate students at SDSU
reveals that there is much interest in this kind of internship opportunity. Negotiation will need to
take place with the various graduate departments at SDSU to make sure that interns are getting
valuable enough experience for the purpose of their internships as MLs at SDCC. Interns are paid,
so this would be a new cost to SDCC that would need review and approval, but it would not disturb
the rate in which classes are offered since faculty would not be used in this capacity.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
7/27
Page 6 of 14
Cohort Sessionsare 1 hour a week; intended to provide dedicated space for students to
interact and engage their class material with the ML present. The Cohort Session schedule is built
into the Cohort Syllabus (see Appendix A). This is also an opportunity for the ML to be tracking
student progress. Students in need of additional services can be identified and encouraged to utilize
the various student services available. Cohort sessions are also an appropriate venue for both ML
and students surveying to maintain continual evaluation and re-assessment of the program and the
specific classes.
Student Learning Outcomes(SLO) for the TCP are guides to ensure that the program has
tangible benefits to the students and to provide a framework within which the program can be
properly evaluated and assessed.
1) RETENTION: Students enrolled in the Transfer Cohort Program (TCP) will have at
least a 50% higher retention rate than the current SDCC rate. Vincent Tinto describes 8
obstacles that keep students from staying and finishing their degrees at community colleges:
Academic Difficulty, Adjustment Difficulty, and Commitments, Goals, Finances, Fit, Involvement, and
Learning (Tinto, 1989). Of those 8 obstacles, the TCP addresses all but the issue of Finances.
1. Academic Difficulty is address directly through the use of a Master Learner (ML) who is in
weekly contact with students and is able to track their progress and help identify weaknesses or
strengths in their study habits and skills. When a student is falling behind, the ML and the co-
students in the cohort are able to encourage the struggling student and assist them as needed
towards regaining their ground academically. If further assistance is needed, the ML can encourage
them to seek assistance in the appropriate Student Services office, whether the need be in writing,
test taking, or personal counseling.
2 and 3. Adjustment Difficulty and Fit are both addressed through the interaction of the
cohort. By being together with other students who are in the same classes and similar stages of life,
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
8/27
Page 7 of 14
students are more likely to make the adjustment into college life as well as feel that they have a
place at the school among friends and colleagues.
4 and 5. Commitments and Goals are both addressed through the registration process and
Cohort Application process. By applying for the program, students will see a clear plan that will lead
them to their Associate Degree as well as the exact path that will take them to the college they
desire. Discussions about transferring begin on day one and are encouraged and reinforced through
the cohort meetings and with the ML.
6. Learning is greatly increased through the cohort meetings through dialogue with fellow
students and the ML. Learning is further enhanced through the interdisciplinary nature of the
classes that are paired and how students will be able to digest and process their class content
through the unique lens of another related field; e.g. taking World History and a Literature class
together enhances each class individually as well as giving the student a fuller picture of the whole
content of both classes.
2) TRANSFER: Students enrolled in the TCP will have at least a 50% higher rate of
transfer than other comparable SDCC students to a 4 year university. The cohort classes are
specifically designed to pair general education classes together that are optimal for meeting the
IGETC curriculum standard that will allow students to transfer to most California State Universities,
as well as University of California institutions and many private schools. City Colleges commonly
have trouble guiding students towards classes that will most benefit them in their goals of
transferring to a 4 year university. The TCP ensures that they are always on track by taking the
guess-work out of class registration. Class size and availability is often a further and unexpected
obstacle for students. This is addressed by having the cohort classes designated specifically for
those in the TCP. Students wishing to take one of the cohort classes may only register for them if
there is space after all TCP students are registered.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
9/27
Page 8 of 14
3) ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE: Students enrolled in the TCP will demonstrate an
interdisciplinary understanding of their field of study resulting in more attractive
applications to universities as well as being generally more prepared for our continually
globalizing and interdisciplinary society and work-force. By pairing classes together, students
have the ability to view individual fields in a new and revealing light. Students taking Sociology and
Statistics, for example, will be able to benefit by having the theoretical knowledge of social
interaction paired with the practical and technical skills needed to quantify sociological data. Many
students will be taking additional classes outside of the cohort and could also reflect on the content
of those classes and how it interacts with the cohort classes within their cohort and with their ML.
Interdisciplinary cohorts provide a deeper type of learning than is possible in stand-alone
courses (Tinto, 1998). This will be continually assessed based on in-class written essays that
students write each semester. The essay question will be determined by the joint cohort faculty
(with input from the ML if desired) with the express purpose of testing their knowledge of both
fields. An example for the HIST100/ENGL105 cohort might be Describe the historical events and
English society that surrounded William Shakespeare. Did specific events influence his writing, or
did he have a direct influence on how history played out? Explain. These essays can be used by
students to create their own portfolio of writing samples to be used in their applications to
universities.
IV. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND SEQUENCE OF EVENTSIn order to fully implement and develop a program of this scope much attention will be paid
to orienting the SDCC staff. The implementation schedule (Appendix B) includes annual
assessments that address different aspects of the broader development of the program. These
assessments will help shape the final model that will be realized by the end of the 4th year.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
10/27
Page 9 of 14
Some necessary steps before implementation begins are necessary. (1) Faculty must full
embrace the program as their own. (2) The Student Services department must know the program
intimately in order to properly counsel students. (3) The Registrars Office must be experts with the
program and that must be reflected on all course materials that are published out of that office.
a. FACULTY COLLABORATION PROCESSThe success of this program depends on many things, but it cannot be overstated how
important faculty ownership is. Faculty will have the ability to make their cohorts as cohesive or
contrasting as they desire. Cohesive courses would lean heavily the content of their partnering
course. Some subject might need to be discussed in Course A before being discussed in Course B. On
the other hand, contrasting courses may merely stand side by side and simply refer to the other for
contrast. Regardless of the approach, the faculty must be intentional in working with the
colleagues to craft the cohort.
A sample syllabus is attached (Appendix A). This is a contrasting cohort. The subjects do not
depend on each other, but special attention was made to have the subject refer to each other
loosely. The course descriptions are also provided exactly as they appear in the Catalog, but
additional information is added to help the student better understand the cohort as a whole. All of
this work should be done in collaboration with both faculty members.
b. STUDENT SERVICES PROCESSThe Student Services Office currently runs all of the various Learning Community programs.
The TCP will also be coordinated through their office. Coordination will entail recruitment of MLs
and assignment of MLs to their respective cohorts. The SS Office will also produce marketing
materials such as the TCP brochure and application. In order for this to go well there will be
training of the Student Services staff led by the Academic Deans office.
c. MASTER LEARNER ORIENTATION
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
11/27
Page 10 of 14
Whether MLs are SDSU interns or fellow faculty, special attention will be given to orienting
MLs to a different kind of student interaction. Faculty members in particular may find it very
strange to suddenly be seated next to students rather than in front of them. SDSU Interns may have
no experience with students at all and may find that they are not well equipped. All of these issues
will need to be carefully watched and the Student Services Counseling Office will provide as much
support for the MLs as possible.
During the four years of implementation, a seminar-style orientation may be best. Over the
course of implementation, though, it may be helpful to develop a Master Learner Handbook1.
d. REGISTRATION PROCESSAcademic Counselors and the online registration system must be fully equipped with the
necessary information and skills to encourage students to enroll in the TCP. The primary emphasis
of recruitment for the program will be on students who are enrolling full-time for the first time at
SDCC. Therefore it will be important to get the full cooperation of the Registration Office starting
with the Registrar. The Registrar will be asked to coordinate the effort to orient the Academic
Counselors to the program and to help get them excited about offering the program to students. The
Registrar will also be responsible for leading the effort to upgrade the online registration system as
well as the website to showcase the TCP and enable students to easily and seamlessly apply for the
program, get confirmation of their acceptance, and register for their classes. Without this massive
effort by the Registrars Office, the program cannot begin let alone succeed.
The course code LCOM is currently in use by the CityLinks and First Year Experience learning
communities. Unfortunately, the only place that code is referenced is through the online class
scheduling tool, or in the online registration process. This code is not mentioned in the SDCC
Catalog at all. This means that one would only register for these classes if one already knew what to
1 Iowa State University has a great Learning Community Mentor Manual that might serve as a suitable
template (http://www.lc.iastate.edu/Mentor%20Resource%20Manual.pdf).
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
12/27
Page 11 of 14
look for. I propose that all of the learning community programs and course offerings have their own
designated section in the Catalog as well.
All of these aspects will take time and coordination to implement firmly. This is why the first
year assessment is focused exclusively on the registration process (see Implementation Map,
Appendix B). The assessment will provide the opportunity to further develop aspect of the
registration and recruitment process soon in the development of the program.
V. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT STRATEGIESOne of the great strengths of the TCP is that assessment is built into the structure of the
program through the use of the Master Learners. But proper distribution and collection of survey
data requires coordination. Therefore, the TCP Coordinator2 in the Student Services Office is
responsible for overseeing the project, guiding and assisting the MLs in their work with students,
collecting and collating the data and reviews from each semester, and keeping the Academic Dean
continually informed of the progress of the program and students. MLs and students are expected
to fill out surveys at the end of each semester (see Appendices E and F). At the end of each academic
year, the TCP Coordinator will provide a summary of the progress of the TCP based on the surveys
of the MLs and students. After each second academic year, the TCP Coordinator will review all
summaries and evaluations and provide the Academic Dean with a report of suggested refinements,
improvements, or corrections or deletions to the program. Continual and routine evaluation and
refinement is a necessary part of this program considering the continual evolution of the student
body and the ever changing requirements of transfer.
The final assessment occurs at the end of the fourth year. This should be a collection of all the
previous surveys as well as a summary of the critiques as a whole. This is the time at which the TCP
2 See Appendix G for the SDCC Student Success Pathways which details the various learning communitycoordinators. It is feasible that Marilyn Harvey would take on the TCP as an extension of the First Year
Experience program.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
13/27
Page 12 of 14
will have to be evaluated on its merits and whether its benefits are outweighing its costs or not. It is
my sincere belief that the program will be enthusiastically renewed at that time.
VI. PROGRAM COST ESTIMATESMaster Learners. As previously mentioned, the cost of the MLs depends on whether they are
SDSU students or fellow faculty, and whether additional adjunct faculty would have to be brought
on if faculty were to be used as MLs. With that in mind, these are the rough estimates:
SDSU Interns ScenarioThe SDSU Intern pay scale is flexible, but can range between $12-
17/hr. Interns would have 4 hours of class time per week3; add to that 1.5 hours of cohort time, and
roughly 2 hours of student advising support outside of class and cohort sessions. Thats 7.5 hours
per week for 14 weeks. That would equal $1,470 per Intern per semester. There are 4 cohorts per
year, so that is an annual cost of $5,880.
Faculty as Master Learners This option would be virtually cost-free. If all classes can
resume as normal while these selected faculty members serve as MLs then the only costs incurred
are through marketing. But if their absence requires adjunct faculty, then according to the SDCC
Schedule B Classroom Salary, the minimum pay for an adjunct faculty member is roughly $26,000.
Marketing Costs In order for all 4 cohort classes to at least break even, there would need to
be roughly 30 students in each cohort or 60 per semester. If 8 percent of those who receive a
brochure end up enrolling in the program then we would need 750 brochures. Nicer, three-fold
brochures in color cost roughly $0.85 a piece, which is $637. Graphic design and layout would be a
one-time fee of roughly $1000 for a professional designer.
3
40 minutes per credit. Each cohort is 6 credits. Thats 240 minutes, or 4 hours.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
14/27
Page 13 of 14
It will need to be discussed whether the SDCC IT department can fully implement the changes
to the online registration system or whether an outside web developing firm will need to be hired.
Considering, changes are made every year it is likely that there will be no additional cost.
Work Needed SDSU Intern Adjunct Faculty Faculty
Master Learners $5,880 $26,000 $0
Marketing
- 750 Brochures
- TCP Applications
$637$100
$637$100
$637$100
Online registration $0 $0 $0
Annual TOTAL $6,617 $26,737 $737
VII. ANTICIPATED CONCERNS OR QUESTIONSWith any new program there are bound to be many questions and nuances that need to be
addressed. These are only a few.
a. CAN STUDENTS ATTEND COHORT CLASSES WITHOUT BEING IN THE COHORT?Yes. It is necessary in order to meet class size minimums, in fact.
b. HOW MUCH COLLABORATION IS REQUIRED OF THE FACULTY MEMBERS?It depends largely on whether faculty chooses to do a more cohesive or contrasting
style cohort. Cohesive will take more time to collaborate on. But these cohorts were
paired with the intention that the classes already have natural connections. They could
simply stand beside one another and connections can already be made.
c. ARE THERE OTHER SUCCESSFUL COMMUNITY COLLEGES IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS LIKETHIS?
There are many varieties of learning communities throughout the nation that are very
successful. This model is a fusion of different pieces of many different programs, like
the Master Learner model at the Baltimore Community College. Karen Kellog attests
that [m]any institutions find that choosing a single model is not as beneficial as using
bits and pieces from two or three models (Kellogg, 1999).
d. IF THE PROGRAM DOES NOT GO WELL (FOR WHATEVER REASON) WILL THERE BE COSTS TODISMANTLING IT?
No. Costs are incurred each semester that the program happens. If the program were
cancelled the costs would be eliminated.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
15/27
Page 14 of 14
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Center For Community College Student Engagement. (2010). The Heart of Student Success: Teaching,Learning, and College Completion (2010 CCSSE Findings) (pp. 1-6). Austin, TX. doi:10.1177/019263658106544221.
Kellogg, K. (1999). Learning Communities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1-6.
McPhail, I., McKusick, D., & Starr, A. (2006). Access With Success: The Master Learning CommunityModel. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 30(2), 145-146. doi:10.1080/10668920500433165.
Office of Institutional Research and Planning. (2010). SDCCD Transfer Report A LongitudinalPerspective Spring 2010. San Diego, CA.
Tinto, V. (1989). Rethinking the First Year of College, 1-8.
Tinto, V. (1998). Learning Communities and the Reconstruction of Remedial Education in HigherEducation 1. New York, (315).
Tinto, V. (2003). Learning Better Together : The Impact of Learning Communities on StudentSuccess . Higher Education, 1-8.
OTHER SOURCES
Adelman, Clifford. 2005.Moving Into Townand Moving On: The Community College in theLives of Traditionalage Students.Adult Education. Washington D.C.
Emily, By, Decker Lardner, and Gillies Malnarich. 2004. Sustaining Learning Communities : Moving
from Curricular to Educational Reform. Innovation.
Hagedorn, Linda Serra. Patterns that Predict Transfer Accepted for publication in Journal ofCollege Student Retention Community College Course Taking Patterns : Identifying theCourse-Taking Patterns that Predict Transfer.Journal of College Student Retention: 0-34.
Killacky, Jim, Cheryl Thomas, and Annette Accomando. 2002. Learning Communities andCommunity Colleges: a Case Study. Community College Journal of Research & Practice 26, no. 10
(December): 763-775. doi:10.1080/10668920290104859.
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/10668920290104859&
magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3.
Tinto, Vincent. 2007. Research and Practice of Student Retention: What Next?, no. 1: 1-19.
Woodruff, Diane, and Patrick Perry. 2008. Focus On Results. San Diego, CA. San Diego, CA.
http://www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/TRIS/research/ARCC/arcc_2008_final.pdf.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
16/27
Class Times, Locations and ProfessorsTuesdays and Thursdays 8:00- 9:40 a.m., 10:00- 11:40 a.m.
Arts and Humanies Room 102
HISTORY PROFESSOR NAME, TITLE COMPOSITION PROFESSOR NAME, TITLE
Oce Hours Oce Hours
Phone/Email Phone/Email
Cohort MeetingsMonday nights starng at 8pm. Locaon to be determined rst day of class collaboravely.
MASTER LEARNER
Phone/Email
COURSE DESCRIPTIONS105 COMPOSITION AND LITERATUREis a composion course using literature as a background for improving wring skills. Students discuss thegeneral nature and elements of literature and literary cricism by reading and analyzing representave works of con, drama, and poetry. Based
on this subject maer, students are required to write a variety of crical papers, including a research paper, comprising at least 6,000 graded
words. This course is designed for transfer students and is suitable for those students interested in literature and in developing strong crical and
analycal wring skills. Designated secons of this course may be taught from a specic cultural perspecve. (FT) Associate Degree Credit &
transfer to CSU and/or private colleges and universies. UC Transfer Course List.
100 WORLD HISTORY I examines the growth of civilizaons and the inter relaonships of peoples of Europe, Asia, Africa and America from the
birth of civilizaon to 1650. Topics in social, intellectual, economic, and polical history are covered. This course is of interest to history majors as
well as anyone seeking a global historical perspecve. (FT) Associate Degree Credit & transfer to CSU and/or private colleges and universies. UC
Transfer Course List.
WHY A COHORT?These classes are being paired as a cohort to enable you, the student, to have a beer historical context with which to
place the various pieces of literature in and thus to beer understand them, as well as allowing you to see literature as
a cultural product rooted in a specic me. The connecons and benets will be made more explicit through your in-
teracons in your cohort and with your Master Learner (ML).
REQUIRED READINGDowns, Robert B. Books that Have Changed the World (2004, Revised Edion).
Fadiman, Clion and Major, John S. The New Lifeme Reading Plan: The Classical Guide to World Literature, Revised
and Expanded (1999).
Rogers, Perry Aspects of Western Civilizaon: Problems and Sources in History, Volume 1 (2010, 7th Edion).
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
17/27
CLASS SCHEDULEHIST 100 ENG 105
Week 1 Geography over me Intro to Wring, Review of various wring samples
Cohort 1. Introducon to the Cohort model, advantages, resources available to students.
2. Discussion of how to integrate cross-curricular topics
Week 2 A Review of Asian History (1300 to 1900) Who are you wring to and why it maers
Cohort 1. Integraon discussion: How are me and culture related? 2. Paper wring skills
Week 3 A Review of Middle-Eastern History
(1300-1900)
The Wring Voice: Acve and Passive voice
Cohort 1. Integraon discussion: How do writers shape the idea of a current culture, especially for future readers?
2. Study disciplines
Week 4 A Review of European History (1300-1900) The Wring Voice: Your voice
Cohort 1. Brief check-up on class comprehension. 2. Discussing student academic goals, focusing on majors and transfer
goals
Week 5 A Review of African History (1300-1900) A Review of English Literature (PART 1 - technique)
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 6 A Review of South American History (1500-1900) A Review of English Literature (PART 2 - style)
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 7 A Review of North American History
(1500-1900)
A Review of Contemporary Literature styles and exam-
ples of what NOT to do. (In-class essay exam)
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 8 Concepts and methods of colonializaon Planning to Write: Free wring, and researching your
concept
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 9 Consequences of colonializaon Researching Connued: Primary/Secondary Sources,
citaon,
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 10 Emergence of a World Economy:
Trading Spices, Trading Religions
A Review of American Literature (PART 1 - technique)
Cohort 1. Open integraon discussion 2. Peer review assignments
Week 11 War, Peace, and Business: Developing Technologies and
their internaonal impact (In-class essay exam)
A Review of American Literature (PART 2 - style)
Cohort Preparaon for Final
Week 12 Decolonizaon in South-East Asia, South Africa, and the
US Colonies
The 5 Part Essay (Part I)
Cohort Preparaon for Final
Week 13 Summary, Review, and Quesons The 5 Part Essay (Part II)
Cohort Preparaon for Final
Week 14 COMBINED FINAL EXAM
Cohort Wrap-up and discussion of next semesters cohorts
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
18/27
ASSIGNMENTSa. Aendance = 5%
You are permied 3 absences without penalty. Each successive absence will deduct 2% from your nal
grade.
b. Pop-Quizzes = 7% each (21% total)
The History class will have 3 pop-quizzes. They will cover the current reading up to that point in the class. If
you have not read you will not pass these quizzes.
c. In Class Essay 1 and 2 = 15% each (30% total)
In-class essays are free wring exercises on quesons that combine both subjects.
d. Wring with Style and Form = 19%
You will write a 5 Part Essay, roughly 6 page double spaced on a topic of your interest from a list of topics to
be provided.
e. Final Test = 25%
The nal will be a combinaon of mulple choice, short essay, matching, and one long essay. All essay ques-
ons will be interdisciplinary in nature.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMESStudents will be able to analyze and idenfy excerpts of literature based on their content and language structure and
place them appropriately within their historical framework.
Students will be able to accurately describe the dierences between poetry, a novel, biography, non-
con, journaliscwring, and theatre as well as give examples of the tone that each literary style takes on.
Students will be able to describe in a short narrave how and why civilizaon began to be understood in terms of East
and West and give some examples of the negave consequences of that split.
CLASS POLICIES Turn o cell phones
Cheang is punishable by automac failure
Aendance is required
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
19/27
(Course oerings in parenthesis were already introduced in a previous cycle.)
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
20/27
R E TE N TION Peer support is the most reliable way to
encourage retention.
TR A N S FE R A B IL ITY A clear and flexible schedule that is
IGETC approved helps students know
exactly which classes to take to reach
their transfer goals.
A C A D E MIC E X C E LLE N C E Master Learners help students to go
the Cohort Transfer Program(TCP)
S u m m a r y The Transfer Cohort Program
is an innovative, comprehen-
sive curriculum designed to
enhance and improve SDCCs
educational experience to the
maximum benefit of the stu-
dent. By pairing complemen-
tary classes which meet
IGETC standards, students
are given a roadmap to the 4-
year university of their choice.By creating cohorts from
these paired classes, students
support and encourage each
other, resulting in higher reten-
tion rates. By assigning a
Master Learner to each cohort
each semester students are
given the necessary attention
to catch academic weaknesses
early on and to emphasize cor-
relations within the cohort as
well as applications to their
own majors. The TCP gives
SDCC a clear advantage toadvance our curriculum from
good to great.
See reverse for a Sample Roadmap for
W W W . S D C C . E D U Matt Cromwell [email protected] (619) 228-6644
T h e B e n e f i t s o f
I m p l e m e n t i n g T C P a t S D C C
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
21/27
A Sample TCP (HISTORY DEGREE)
W W W . S D C C . E D U Matt Cromwell [email protected] (619) 228-6644
YEAR 1FALL SEMESTER
FACT, FICTION AND CULTURE BUILDING (ENGL 105: Composition and Literature & HIST100: World History I) Viewing world history through events and the cultural expression of
literature while strengthening students understanding of writing.
MUSINGS OF THE MUSE (PHIL205: Critical Thinking and Writing in Philosophy &
DRAM109: Theatre and Social Issues) Students study creative applications of philosophical and social issues.
History majors also begin their first 6 -unit sequence with either
HIST 105, 109, 115A, 120, or 1 41
SPRING SEMESTERBETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD P LACE(GEOL100: General Geology & SPEE160: Argumentation) Learning the art of persuasion and advocacy of ecological issues.
COUNTING THE STEPS TO MECCA (MATH119: Elementary Statistics & HUMA106: World Religions) Learning percentages and averages through global cultural phenomena. Depending on which sequence History majors began in the Fall, they continue
with either HIST 106, 110, 115B, 121, 123, or 142.
YEAR 2FALL SEMESTERPEOPLE AND PLACES OVER TIME (GEOG102: Cultural Geography & HIST101: World History II) Observing how specific cultures have place and take root
in their time and geographic space. OUR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT(SOCO223: Globalization and Social Change &
BIOL101: Issues in Environmental Biology) Students learn about what stimulates change in both
societies and living species. History majors begin their second sequenceSPRING SEMESTERLANGUAGES AND WRAP-UPThe last semester is used for to fulfill the language other
than English requirement (for CSU IGETC standards) and to
complete both the 2nd and 3rd History sequences.
Because of the wide variety of classes that students will be
taking, Cohort sessions are focused on finalizing college
applications, questions regarding graduating with an AA versus a
BA, financial aid, resume building and job preparation (for those
wanting to work or who will not pursue their BA).
Naturally, students who apply for the TCP in their first semester and choose a major will benefit the most from the program. But
cohorts begin each semester so a student who has not declared a major, or only recently learned of the program can join each
semester. The focus is primarily on fulfilling GE requirements to transfer, but there is built-in space for majors to add their classes as
well. Below is a sample of what it would look like for a History major to be enrolled in the TCP for 2 years.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
22/27
This is the applicaon used to enter the SDCC First Year Experience. This serves the exact purpose for applicaon into the TCP.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
23/27
Learning Community Survey
Introduction and Instructions
Here is a complete listing of the items available on the Learning Community Survey. We encourage you to use this instrument as a
way to gather useful information about students experiences in your learning community.
The survey is available through WebCT. You may Import the Learning Community Surveys into your course by completing the fol-
lowing:Select the Build tab > select Manage Course > select Import > select Repository > select the second Iowa State University label >
select the folder Learning Community Information > select the next folder Surveys > select the radio button in front of the sur-
vey you wish to import > select OK.
The survey is designed to allow coordinators to customize the instrument to match individual learning outcomes. Please select rele-
vant items from the template in an effort to gather the most useful data. The Common Core questions (question 1 through 41) rep-
resent a set of items that we hope most coordinators will include in the survey. Please note, however, that you may elect to eliminate
some of these questions (e.g., Peer Mentor items) if they are not relevant to your students experiences. The Outcome Mod-
ules (questions 42 to 75) provide several sets of questions designed to measure specific outcomes. Please remove any questions that
do not align with the learning outcomes or experiences in your individual learning community. Please contact Kevin Saunders
([email protected], 4-7063) if you need assistance in customizing the instrument.
After youve completed the administration of the survey, we encourage you to contact Kevin Saunders ([email protected], 4 -
7063) for assistance in compiling and analyzing the data. Weve developed a number of automated processes that will provide you
with a summary of the data along with some graphical information.
Common Core[q1 to q42]
Satisfaction with Learning Community
Please indicate yoursatisfaction with yourlearning community experience
(Very Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Strongly Satisfied)
1. Overall satisfaction with your learning community experience. [q1]
2. Satisfaction with the social activities in your learning community. [q2]
Please answer the following question using the scale below.
(Strongly Discourage, Somewhat Discourage, Somewhat Encourage, Strongly Encourage)
3. Would you recommend joining a Learning Community to a friend or prospective student? [q3]
Open-ended
This is a dra survey created by Iowa State University. It may serve well as a template for a SDCC student sasfacon survey.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
24/27
4. Please explain why you would or would not recommend joining a learning community? [q4]
University Experience
My participation in a learning community has improved:
(Strongly Disagree, Somewhat Disagree, Somewhat Agree, Strongly Agree)
1. my sense of belonging in the ISU community. [q5]
2. my opportunity to interact with ISU faculty and staff. [q6]
3. my sense of social support at ISU. [q7]
4. my interest in continuing my education at ISU. [q8]
5. my adjustment to academic challenges. [q9]
6.
the quality of my overall experiences at Iowa State. [q10]
7. my connections to other clubs and university activities [q11]
8. my awareness of resources on-campus [q12]
9. my ability to get to know students who have similar interests [q13]
10. my opportunities to become more involved in community activities (volunteering, service learning, civic organizations)
[q14]
11. my communication with professors [q15]
12. my participation in study groups [q16]
13.
my ability to effectively and comfortably interact with people from other cultures or ethnic groups [q17]
14. my understanding of diverse cultures and values [q18]
15. my knowledge of issues and problems facing the world [q19]
16. my adjustment to academic challenges. [q20 Note this is a repeat of q9 so please delete]
Learning Experiences
My involvement in a learning community has helped me to:
(Strongly Disagree, Somewhat Disagree, Somewhat Agree, Strongly Agree)
1. see connections among my classes (e.g., learning in one class supported or expanded on what I learned in another class).
[q21]
2. see connections between my personal experiences and class learning. [q22]
3. better understand the nature of my anticipated major. [q23]
4. apply what I learn in class to real world problems. [q24]
5. practice the skills I am learning or have learned. [q25]
6. find support for helping my learning [q26]
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
25/27
7. improve my study skills [q27]
8. become involved in service learning activities [q28]
Peer Mentor
(Strongly Disagree, Somewhat Disagree, Somewhat Agree, Strongly Agree)
1. Overall my peer mentor has been helpful. [q29]
2. My peer mentor provides me with useful information. [q30]
3. My peer mentor facilitates interactions among learning community participants. [q31]
4. I have regular interactions with my peer mentor. [q32]
5. My peer mentor encourages learning community participants to study together. [q33]
6.
My peer mentor has kept me informed about upcoming learning community activities. [q34]
7. My peer mentor has helped me to learn about university resources [q35]
8. My peer mentor has helped me to succeed in my classes [q36]
Open-ended
9. In what ways has having a peer mentor been beneficial to you? [q37]
10. How could your peer mentor have better assisted you? [q38]
General Open-ended
1.
Why did you choose to join a learning community? [q39]
2. What was the most satisfying aspect of your learning community? [q40]
3. What was the most disappointing aspect of your learning community? [q41]
4. Do you have any comments and suggestions for your learning community? [q42]
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
26/27
Reecon and Post-Evaluaon of Mentor Experience
Mentor-Post-Evaluaon Quesonnaire: Fall 2007
1. On a scale of 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent), how would you rank your experience as peer mentor this semester?
1 2 3 4 5
2. What personal benets have you gained from being a peer mentor?
3. As a peer mentor this semester, what did you do well?
4. As a peer mentor this semester, what could you have done beer?
5. What suggesons would make for improving (LC class) for future semesters?
6. How could we make the (LC class) experience beer for future peer mentors?
This is a dra survey created by Iowa State University. It may serve well as a template for a SDCC Master Learner survey.
-
8/8/2019 The Transfer Cohort Program
27/27